23.03.2013 Views

Nevill Johnson: Paint the smell of grass - Eoin O'Brien

Nevill Johnson: Paint the smell of grass - Eoin O'Brien

Nevill Johnson: Paint the smell of grass - Eoin O'Brien

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

time, but despite a not dissimilar mood shared between his work and <strong>Johnson</strong>’s, <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

comparison to be sustained with him. There is a closer link with <strong>the</strong> paintings <strong>of</strong> Michael<br />

Andrews, who drank in and painted <strong>the</strong> Colony Room club in <strong>the</strong> 1950s and 1960s and might<br />

have met <strong>Johnson</strong> here or in ano<strong>the</strong>r Soho drinking spot.<br />

<strong>Johnson</strong> was to remain on his own as a painter and his greatest supporters and collectors were<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten from outside <strong>the</strong> world <strong>of</strong> art. The introduction to his next exhibition, at <strong>the</strong> Archer Gallery<br />

on Grafton Street in central London in 1972, was written by Dr Owen Franklin. <strong>Johnson</strong> himself<br />

included three thoughts that are an interesting guide to his sense <strong>of</strong> himself as a painter at that<br />

time.<br />

70 <strong>Nevill</strong> <strong>Johnson</strong> l <strong>Paint</strong> <strong>the</strong> Smell <strong>of</strong> Grass<br />

Silent Encounter<br />

Metropolis<br />

“<strong>Paint</strong>ing is an encounter. A struggle to uncover intuited structures.”<br />

“<strong>Paint</strong>ing is a physical, visceral engagement, a contact with primordial codes. A response and<br />

a responsibility.”<br />

“Of <strong>the</strong> work I make I am <strong>the</strong> first spectator. I am first-footing it in a strangely familiar place.”<br />

For a highly articulate man <strong>of</strong> literary inclinations, <strong>Johnson</strong> rarely pronounced on his own<br />

painting and it is revealing that all three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se statements reinforce <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> painting as an<br />

instinctive response to what is only expressed and understood through <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> making <strong>the</strong><br />

image. Owen Franklin writes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Johnson</strong> “using a grammar <strong>of</strong> symbols that he has developed,<br />

symbols not referent to linear logic, but hierarchic, beyond <strong>the</strong> word…in that way one can avoid<br />

<strong>the</strong> censor <strong>of</strong> one’s super-ego and suppress one’s conscious personality.”<br />

These artist’s statements recall <strong>the</strong> magical signs that guide us through <strong>the</strong> post-war painting<br />

and hint at <strong>the</strong>ir meaning, and <strong>the</strong> empty shores <strong>of</strong> a bare world that he painted in which we have<br />

to re-discover ourselves. The artist has to find a language <strong>of</strong> signs and visual forms that reveal <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Nevill</strong> <strong>Johnson</strong> l Wilby and after 1959–1977 71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!