Take Two - Third Evaluation Report More than Words ... - Berry Street

Table 28 Type of Direct Face-to-Face Work Provided for Take Two Regional and Aboriginal Teams’
Clients in 2006—2007 Financial Year Based on Client Activity Sheets 92
Table 29 Location of Service Provision and Travel Time for Take Two Regional and Aboriginal Teams’
Clients in 2006—2007 Financial Year Based on Client Activity Sheets 93
Table 30 Interventions by Take Two Regional and Aboriginal Teams for Cases Open from Jan 2006 to
June 2007 According to Clinicians Surveys (N=307) 94
Table 31 Type of Other Services Working with Children during Take Two Involvement for Regional
and Aboriginal Teams’ Open Cases in January 2006 to June 2007
Based on Clinicians Surveys (N=314) 100
Table 32 Consultations Provided by Take Two Teams in 2006 – 2007 Financial Year (N=864) 101
Table 33 Baseline Data: Percentage of Children who were Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 –
June 2007 in the Normal, Borderline and Clinical Range on Scales of the SDQ as Reported by
Young People, Parents, Carers and Teachers (N=504) 105
Table 34 Baseline Data: Overall Dif culties Ratings for Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007
on the SDQ as Reported by Young People, Parents, Carers and Teachers (N=489) 106
Table 35 Baseline Data: Responses regarding Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007 to
the SDQ Question ‘How Long have these Dif culties been Present?’ as Reported by Young People,
Parents, Carers and Teachers (N=395) 107
Table 36 Baseline Data: Percentage of Children who were Clients of Take Two between Jan 2004 – June 2007
in the Normal, Borderline and Clinical Range on the Impact Score of the SDQ as Reported by Young
People, Parents, Carers and Teachers (M=425) 107
Table 37 Baseline Data: Responses regarding Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007 to the SDQ
question ‘Do the Dif culties put a Burden on You or the Family?’ as Reported by Young People,
Parents, Carers and Teachers (N=504) 107
Table 38 Percentage of Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007 in the Clinical Range on Scales of the
SDQ at Assessment and Follow-up as Reported by Young People, Parents, Carers and Teachers 109
Table 39 Mean scores of the SDQ Scales for Take Two clients between Jan 2004 –June 2007 at Time 1 and
Time 2 as Reported by Young People, Parents, Carers and Teachers 111
Table 40 Questions on the Follow-up SDQ for Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007 as to whether
Take Two Intervention has been Helpful as Reported by Young People, Parents, Carers and Teachers 112
Table 41 Children’s Experiences of Abuse and Neglect According to HCAs at Time of Referral Associated with
the Baseline TSCC Scales and Subscales being in the Clinical Range for Take Two Clients between
Jan 2004 – June 2007 (N=105) 117
Table 42 Consequences in Terms of Type of Harms According to HCAs at Time of Referral Associated with the
Baseline TSCC Scales and Subscales being in the Clinical Range for Take Two Clients between
Jan 2004 – June 2007 (N=105) 118
Table 43 Comparing the Mean T scores of the TSCC Scales and Subscales across Time 1 and Time 2 for
Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007 (n=51) 120
Table 44 Number and Percentage of Children in The Take Two Program between Jan 2004 – June 2007 in the
Clinical Range of the TSCC at each Scale and Subscale at Time 1 and Time 2 (n=51) 121
Table 45 Comparing the Mean T Scores of the TSCYC Scales for Take Two Clients between
Jan 2004 – June 2007 across Time 1 and Time 2 (n=23) 123
Table 46 Percentage of Take Two Clients between Jan 2004 – June 2007 in the Clinical Range of the TSCYC
Scales at Time 1 and Time 2 (n=23) 124
Table 47 Mean Number and Standard Deviations of People who were Listed in Social Network Grids by
Clients involved with Take Two between Jan 2004 – June 2007 in Terms of Levels and Types of
Support and Closeness (N=76) 129
Table 48 Comparing the Means of Percentage of People listed in each Area of Life by Clients involved with
Take Two between Jan 2004 – June 2007 (n=28) 131
Table 49 Mean and Standard Deviations of Level of Support and Closeness in Social Network Maps (N=28)
for Take Two Cases Open between Jan 2004 – June 2007 from Time 1 and Time 2 131
Table 50 Responses to Stakeholder Survey Relating to Different Aspects of Satisfaction with Take Two
(2007 & 2008) (N=266) 135
Table 51 Responses to Stakeholder Surveys Relating to Perception of Outcomes for the Child involved
with Take Two (2007 & 2008) 139
xii
Frederico, Jackson, & Black (2010) “More than Words” – Take Two Third Evaluation Report, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia