24.03.2013 Views

Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...

Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...

Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Approved NSW <strong>Recovery</strong> Plan Brush-<strong>tailed</strong> <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong><br />

colonies existing in 18 sites in central, sou<strong>the</strong>rn and western NSW and more than 100 colonies in<br />

15 sites in nor<strong>the</strong>rn NSW (Dovey et al 1997). The survey found a fur<strong>the</strong>r 14 sites where <strong>the</strong><br />

animals had become extinct. Since 1993, <strong>the</strong> BTRW has disappeared from ano<strong>the</strong>r five sites,<br />

meaning it has become extinct at, or vacated, 49 sites since 1990. A National Parks and Wildlife<br />

Service survey in 1995 located 15 colonies <strong>of</strong> BTRWs in Yengo National Park and Parr State<br />

Recreation Area and surrounding areas (Rummery et al 1995).<br />

Past variations in <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong> distributions and genetic variation are thought to be due to<br />

bioclimatic variables (Eldridge and Browning unpub., Cavanagh unpub.). In particular, modelled<br />

shifts in <strong>the</strong> climate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BTRW and Herbert’s <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong> (Petrogale herberti)<br />

indicate that oscillations and overlaps in <strong>the</strong> two species’ ranges over time may be factors in <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> hybrids between <strong>the</strong> species. Climate modelling also indicates that <strong>the</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BTRW in <strong>the</strong> Grampians region may have occurred only within <strong>the</strong> last 20,000 to 10,000<br />

years (Cavanagh unpub.).<br />

5.2 Abundance<br />

During <strong>the</strong> late 1880s, BTRWs were abundant and widespread across <strong>the</strong> <strong>rock</strong>y country <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

Australia from sou<strong>the</strong>rn Queensland to Victoria. From 1900 until about 1920, hundreds<br />

<strong>of</strong> thousands were shot as agricultural pests and hunted <strong>for</strong> fur (Lunney et al 1997). Their<br />

numbers have continued to fall in most localities and it is now estimated that <strong>the</strong>re are between<br />

15,000 and 30,000 animals left. Gaining a more precise estimate <strong>of</strong> numbers is difficult due to<br />

<strong>the</strong> inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species’ habitats, particularly in <strong>the</strong> north where numbers are greater.<br />

Approximately 17% <strong>of</strong> BTRWs occur in south-eastern Queensland, 82% in NSW, and fewer<br />

than 1% in Victoria. In NSW, as many as 98 % <strong>of</strong> BTRWs are found north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hunter River,<br />

and up to 80 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> BTRWs in Australia are found in north-eastern NSW (see<br />

Figure 8). Most nor<strong>the</strong>rn NSW populations are in <strong>the</strong> Macleay River and Clarence River gorges<br />

(Bayne pers. comm., Dovey et al 1997).<br />

While it is possible that numbers in <strong>the</strong> north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species’ range were always higher than in<br />

<strong>the</strong> south, substantial evidence indicates <strong>the</strong> relative numbers in <strong>the</strong> south have been drastically<br />

reduced (e.g. Lunney et al 1997, Short and Milkovits 1990). Accurately estimating abundance<br />

remains one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> challenges in recovery <strong>plan</strong>ning.<br />

A recent study by Piggott et al (2006a) explains a promising new technique <strong>for</strong> estimating <strong>the</strong><br />

population size <strong>of</strong> BTRW colonies. In a study <strong>of</strong> four BTRW colonies in Wollemi National Park,<br />

individual BTRWs were identified by genetic analysis <strong>of</strong> scats. DNA fingerprinting <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />

material from faeces can distinguish individuals and provides a minimum number <strong>of</strong> animals<br />

alive at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> sampling. This method can also distinguish between males and females, and<br />

can detect birth and recruitment over time. Repeated sampling in colonies can <strong>the</strong>n provide an<br />

estimated population size. In <strong>the</strong> Wolgan Valley, this technique determined that <strong>the</strong>re was one<br />

large colony <strong>of</strong> approximately 67 animals, two smaller colonies <strong>of</strong> approximately 11–17 animals<br />

and a very small colony <strong>of</strong> 2–4 animals. In <strong>the</strong> smallest colony, <strong>the</strong>re was evidence <strong>of</strong> an<br />

increase in population size over a two-year period due to <strong>the</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> a new individual from a<br />

female previously identified in a different sampling time (Piggott et al 2006a).<br />

An added advantage <strong>of</strong> this method is that <strong>the</strong> genetic data obtained can also be used to infer<br />

dispersal patterns and population structure.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!