Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...
Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...
Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Approved NSW <strong>Recovery</strong> Plan Brush-<strong>tailed</strong> <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong><br />
colonies existing in 18 sites in central, sou<strong>the</strong>rn and western NSW and more than 100 colonies in<br />
15 sites in nor<strong>the</strong>rn NSW (Dovey et al 1997). The survey found a fur<strong>the</strong>r 14 sites where <strong>the</strong><br />
animals had become extinct. Since 1993, <strong>the</strong> BTRW has disappeared from ano<strong>the</strong>r five sites,<br />
meaning it has become extinct at, or vacated, 49 sites since 1990. A National Parks and Wildlife<br />
Service survey in 1995 located 15 colonies <strong>of</strong> BTRWs in Yengo National Park and Parr State<br />
Recreation Area and surrounding areas (Rummery et al 1995).<br />
Past variations in <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong> distributions and genetic variation are thought to be due to<br />
bioclimatic variables (Eldridge and Browning unpub., Cavanagh unpub.). In particular, modelled<br />
shifts in <strong>the</strong> climate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ranges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BTRW and Herbert’s <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong> (Petrogale herberti)<br />
indicate that oscillations and overlaps in <strong>the</strong> two species’ ranges over time may be factors in <strong>the</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> hybrids between <strong>the</strong> species. Climate modelling also indicates that <strong>the</strong> presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BTRW in <strong>the</strong> Grampians region may have occurred only within <strong>the</strong> last 20,000 to 10,000<br />
years (Cavanagh unpub.).<br />
5.2 Abundance<br />
During <strong>the</strong> late 1880s, BTRWs were abundant and widespread across <strong>the</strong> <strong>rock</strong>y country <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern<br />
Australia from sou<strong>the</strong>rn Queensland to Victoria. From 1900 until about 1920, hundreds<br />
<strong>of</strong> thousands were shot as agricultural pests and hunted <strong>for</strong> fur (Lunney et al 1997). Their<br />
numbers have continued to fall in most localities and it is now estimated that <strong>the</strong>re are between<br />
15,000 and 30,000 animals left. Gaining a more precise estimate <strong>of</strong> numbers is difficult due to<br />
<strong>the</strong> inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species’ habitats, particularly in <strong>the</strong> north where numbers are greater.<br />
Approximately 17% <strong>of</strong> BTRWs occur in south-eastern Queensland, 82% in NSW, and fewer<br />
than 1% in Victoria. In NSW, as many as 98 % <strong>of</strong> BTRWs are found north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hunter River,<br />
and up to 80 % <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> BTRWs in Australia are found in north-eastern NSW (see<br />
Figure 8). Most nor<strong>the</strong>rn NSW populations are in <strong>the</strong> Macleay River and Clarence River gorges<br />
(Bayne pers. comm., Dovey et al 1997).<br />
While it is possible that numbers in <strong>the</strong> north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species’ range were always higher than in<br />
<strong>the</strong> south, substantial evidence indicates <strong>the</strong> relative numbers in <strong>the</strong> south have been drastically<br />
reduced (e.g. Lunney et al 1997, Short and Milkovits 1990). Accurately estimating abundance<br />
remains one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> challenges in recovery <strong>plan</strong>ning.<br />
A recent study by Piggott et al (2006a) explains a promising new technique <strong>for</strong> estimating <strong>the</strong><br />
population size <strong>of</strong> BTRW colonies. In a study <strong>of</strong> four BTRW colonies in Wollemi National Park,<br />
individual BTRWs were identified by genetic analysis <strong>of</strong> scats. DNA fingerprinting <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
material from faeces can distinguish individuals and provides a minimum number <strong>of</strong> animals<br />
alive at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> sampling. This method can also distinguish between males and females, and<br />
can detect birth and recruitment over time. Repeated sampling in colonies can <strong>the</strong>n provide an<br />
estimated population size. In <strong>the</strong> Wolgan Valley, this technique determined that <strong>the</strong>re was one<br />
large colony <strong>of</strong> approximately 67 animals, two smaller colonies <strong>of</strong> approximately 11–17 animals<br />
and a very small colony <strong>of</strong> 2–4 animals. In <strong>the</strong> smallest colony, <strong>the</strong>re was evidence <strong>of</strong> an<br />
increase in population size over a two-year period due to <strong>the</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> a new individual from a<br />
female previously identified in a different sampling time (Piggott et al 2006a).<br />
An added advantage <strong>of</strong> this method is that <strong>the</strong> genetic data obtained can also be used to infer<br />
dispersal patterns and population structure.<br />
14