24.03.2013 Views

Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...

Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...

Recovery plan for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Approved NSW <strong>Recovery</strong> Plan Brush-<strong>tailed</strong> <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong><br />

unpub.). Large spreading fig trees are a common shelter <strong>plan</strong>t in <strong>the</strong> New England area (Bayne<br />

1994).<br />

Of 963 recorded sites, Cavanagh (unpub.) found that approximately 73% <strong>of</strong> sites had a nor<strong>the</strong>rly<br />

aspect (west through north to east) and 24% <strong>of</strong> sites had a sou<strong>the</strong>rly aspect (west south-west<br />

through south to east south-east). Although many extant BTRW colonies are on north-facing<br />

slopes and cliff lines (Short 1982), numerous colonies also occur on south-facing cliffs where<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site are exposed to <strong>the</strong> sun, <strong>for</strong> example, a freestanding <strong>rock</strong> pinnacle or prominent<br />

spur. Such sites are found in Kangaroo Valley (Kutzner and Dodd 1996, Wong 1997), in <strong>the</strong><br />

Macleay River Gorge (Bayne 1994), at <strong>the</strong> Warrumbungles and at Mt Kaputar (Soderquist pers.<br />

comm.). This in<strong>for</strong>mation suggests north-facing habitat may be preferred but is not essential, and<br />

that aspect should never be used to discount areas <strong>of</strong> potential BTRW habitat.<br />

8.2 Vegetation<br />

The vegetation on and below <strong>the</strong> cliff appears to be <strong>of</strong> equal importance to BTRWs. It is a source<br />

<strong>of</strong> food and shelter and in some cases may provide some protection from predation (Wong 1993,<br />

1997). The proximity <strong>of</strong> mesic vegetation, and appropriate vegetation structure and floristics, are<br />

important habitat factors <strong>for</strong> BTRWs in <strong>the</strong> Shoalhaven (Bugg 1995). This follows similar results<br />

<strong>of</strong> studies on o<strong>the</strong>r species <strong>of</strong> <strong>rock</strong>-<strong>wallaby</strong> (Lim and Giles 1987, Pearson 1992). Bugg (1995)<br />

also found that core BTRW habitat in <strong>the</strong> Shoalhaven area and in Kangaroo Valley occurs where<br />

mesic vegetation is associated with complex cliffs, boulder piles and <strong>rock</strong> outcrops.<br />

The invasion <strong>of</strong> grassy feeding areas by weed species such as lantana is thought to reduce habitat<br />

quality <strong>for</strong> BTRWs (Capararo and Beynon 1996, Wong 1997).<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!