24.03.2013 Views

Subterranean ecosystems - Universidade de Évora

Subterranean ecosystems - Universidade de Évora

Subterranean ecosystems - Universidade de Évora

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IAH 2007 XXXV Congress - Groundwater and Ecosystems Lisbon, Portugal<br />

Expanding concepts within eco-hydrology to accommodate the<br />

hydrodiversity of groundwater <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>ecosystems</strong><br />

(or how do aquifers make <strong>ecosystems</strong> lazy, inefficient and vulnerable?)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Christine COLVIN<br />

Natural Resources and the Environment, CSIR, Stellenbosch, South Africa.<br />

E-mail: ccolvin@csir.co.za<br />

Whilst hydrogeology studies the flow of water through the lithosphere, ecology studies the biologically mediated<br />

flow of energy through the biosphere. We currently lack a generic conceptual framework to examine the waterenergy<br />

interface of groundwater linked <strong>ecosystems</strong>. Eco-hydrology has emerged as a trans-disciplinary area of<br />

study over the last 2 <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s in an attempt to consi<strong>de</strong>r water links to <strong>ecosystems</strong> more holistically. However,<br />

currently two domains are evi<strong>de</strong>nt within this field: soil-moisture driven terrestrial systems and surface-water<br />

driven aquatic systems. Groundwater <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>ecosystems</strong> (GDEs) exist in a diverse range of habitats,<br />

spanning both aquatic and terrestrial systems, and their study encourages thinking towards a more inclusive and<br />

holistic earth-system mo<strong>de</strong>l. Much of the previous (valuable) work on GDEs has consi<strong>de</strong>red individual case<br />

studies (eg Doñana wetlands) or types of habitats (in-aquifer systems), and studies have adopted a bi-disciplinary<br />

approach, linking hydrogeology to ecology, ecophysiology or hydrology. Predominantly bi-disciplinary studies<br />

have resulted in some confusing and conflicting applications of terminology.<br />

This paper proposes some clarifications for terminology, particularly groundwater <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />

<strong>ecosystems</strong> and aquifer <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>ecosystems</strong>. It proposes that ecosystem water requirements should be<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red in terms of hydrotopes at the landscape and ecosystem scale. Hydrotopes may be <strong>de</strong>lineated in<br />

specific habitats with characteristic spatial and temporal patterns of water provision from precipitation, soil<br />

moisture, surface water, groundwater, tidal and oceanic sources. The Trigger-Transfer-Reserve-Pulse (TTRP)<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l of landscape ecology, is incorporated and expan<strong>de</strong>d to account for the variable storage-transfer functions<br />

of different hydrological pathways. The interplay of (typically) soil-moisture/ surface water/ groundwater<br />

transfers to an ecosystem <strong>de</strong>fine the hydrodiversity and hydroperiodicity of an ecosystem. Special attention is<br />

given to aquifer <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>ecosystems</strong> (ADEs) in water controlled (semi-arid and arid) environments, with an<br />

illustration of hydrotope typesetting examples in Southern Africa. Semi-arid zone ADEs typically represent<br />

keystone <strong>ecosystems</strong> at ecotones with characteristic hydrotopes of biologically mediated aquifer discharge.<br />

Linear and discrete spatial discharge patterns of fractured and alluvial aquifer systems contribute to ecosystem<br />

heterogeneity and ‘patchiness’. The larger (volume) and more sustained hydrodiversity of aquifer fed<br />

hydrotopes sustain relatively high productivity during seasonal periods of relative dormancy in neighbouring<br />

soil-moisture <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt hydrotopes. Both terrestrial and aquatic ADEs in these environments are believed to<br />

have greater hydrological resistance to disturbances in water inputs and contribute resilience to the surrounding<br />

ecosystem. However, ADEs have a relatively low resilience (ability to recover) following changes to the aquifer<br />

flow regime beyond natural minima and maxima, and are more vulnerable to irreversible alteration by disruption<br />

of aquifer flow. Typically ADEs subsidise neighbouring non-ADEs through trophic casca<strong>de</strong>s. Linked to their<br />

smoothed hydroperiodicity, it is expected that ADEs have a lower water efficiency in primary productivity<br />

(gC.H2Omm -1 ) may show net mean annual productivity equivalent to their more ‘flashy’ episodic neighbours,<br />

who have high productivity during the shorter periods of water availability.<br />

In a nutshell – ADEs in water controlled environments have a greater hydrodiversity and characteristic<br />

smoothed, longer hydroperiod due aquifer-fed baseflow, than neighbouring hydrotopes, reliant predominantly on<br />

surface water or soil-moisture. The additional water budget available to ADEs, slowly released from aquifer<br />

reserves, effectively lubricates slower and more prolonged productivity. Whilst ADEs are typically net exporters<br />

of ecological services to surrounding non-ADEs, they tend to be lazy, inefficient and vulnerable!<br />

Keywords: ecohydrology, groundwater <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>ecosystems</strong>, hydrotopes, hydrodiversity.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!