26.03.2013 Views

A HAIRLESS HORSE, A CRAZY DIAMOND, A GAY TRAITOR ...

A HAIRLESS HORSE, A CRAZY DIAMOND, A GAY TRAITOR ...

A HAIRLESS HORSE, A CRAZY DIAMOND, A GAY TRAITOR ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

single pulp paperbacks priced individually from a few pounds to large collections of wild Oriental<br />

antiques, Pop art, and so on, for much more money. He was a Mickey Mouse type, seemingly in two<br />

places at the same time, for he travelled constantly and bought from everyone – the bouquinistes<br />

on the banks of the Seine, a laid back A-frame dwelling hippy dealer of California, a bohemian<br />

Parisian poster dealer in a converted garage, an auteur photo galleriste, the retro soft porn dealers<br />

of Lyon, the psychedelic specialist of Greenwich Village, a hip bookshop in Notting Hill, Timothy<br />

Leary’s archivist, a Beat books vendor in an Islington basement and the big auction rooms of the<br />

Western World. In the latter, he arguably drove the price way up for ‘funky’ stuff by the Marquis de<br />

Sade, Hans Bellmer, Arthur Rimbaud, Charles Baudelaire, and others. He even, from time to time,<br />

bought books at an old bookshop in Mayfair called Maggs Bros. He also began to get to the source<br />

of the stuff from the sometimes ancient and venerable old longhaired hippies and Lower East Side<br />

punkers. He was at various times part of a number of scenes around the Stones, Warhol, Johnny<br />

Thunders, Max’s, The Lower East Side of Basquiat and Haring, etc.<br />

Most importantly, perhaps, he bought massively off Ebay at the very moment that the Englishspeaking<br />

world was emptying its garages and attics onto the internet. Then there was the rare book<br />

portion of the internet that he bought hugely from; he had people dedicated just to following up<br />

his want matches on ABE, I think. So, the shape and direction would probably have been very<br />

different if that lift had been summoned from below rather than from above. He was, of course, not<br />

alone in this great passion for collecting the counterculture, there are other great private collectors<br />

such as Philip Aarons and Richard Prince but his buying in overlapping areas surely affected their<br />

book hunts, their goals, the availability of material and the way that it was presented and, indeed,<br />

priced in dealers’ catalogues. He was a very superstitious man, and a dead dog, like the albatross to<br />

the maritime explorers of old, or a crow to the Norseman, could have been a very bad omen for him<br />

indeed.<br />

Aside from these ‘butterfly’ sort of effects, how does a book become collectable, a good book to<br />

collect? I’ll model very crudely how it happened for some books in the twentieth century, in the<br />

hope that this will illuminate the collecting of counterculture. On occasion, books that became<br />

collectable were tested or ‘made’ first by the primary market, they had saleability, they were<br />

popular. People bought the book, it became scarce or, rather, it went out of print, and they started<br />

to look in the second-hand market for other copies. This was the case with Ian Fleming’s Bond<br />

series of novels, and also TE Lawrence. You might equally ask how a theory becomes a truth in<br />

science; ideally, there is a theory that is tested through experimentation and observation. So, for<br />

example, Einstein’s theory that light was deflected by the gravitational field of large planetary<br />

bodies was proved by Eddington’s observations and measurements of a solar eclipse. You might call<br />

this the inner truth of how a book becomes collectable and in parallel how a hypothesis is proved.<br />

Then there is the external bit, it is not enough to have a theory proved in the lab or the field. It<br />

has to be disseminated and tested through peer-reviewed journals, conferences, popular science<br />

books, lobbying and, of course, it has to be given funding to become ‘true’. Similarly, enterprising<br />

rare book dealers, auctioneers and some collectors catalogue books and produce books about books<br />

to bring out their nuances, create a sense of connoisseurship and thereby make them more<br />

desirable and, in the process, create bigger markets. Film adaptations are made, Fleming and Bond<br />

again, further stimulating the market and increasing the pull, the shelf appeal, and adding noughts<br />

to the price. Examples of very important collector catalogues that drove markets include Printing<br />

and The Mind of Man and Martin Parr and Gerry Badger’s two volume history of photobooks. These<br />

became shopping lists for collectors. You could say the same for learned journals and magazines<br />

such as Nature and New Scientist which drove funding to exploit scientific discoveries.<br />

You may well also have a stratum of wealthy collectors who all hit the demographic bend at the<br />

same time and create an even richer market for the books already at ‘critical mass’, exploding them<br />

into the realms of super collectability. You might call this the ‘external’ way that books become<br />

collectable and truths become true, i.e. both are partly determined by society and not the quality of<br />

the text or the conclusions of an experiment. Most importantly, a good book can be determined by<br />

how much money and effort is put into marketing it. The amazing publicity machine used by the<br />

big auction houses is one example of money and marketing. In a rather too perfect example of this<br />

parallel between science and book collecting, a wealthy vice president of J.P. Morgan called Gordon<br />

Wasson believed that the ancient drug Soma of the Sanskrit Rg Veda, was in fact the red and white<br />

fly agaric mushroom of European fairytales. He kept the idea in vogue by printing his books in fine<br />

bindings, beautifully laid out with great typography, in limited editions and on good paper printed<br />

at the Stamperia Valdonega in Verona.<br />

In 1973, a Russian scholar noted this ‘bling effect’ in a letter to the late John Brough, the<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!