26.03.2013 Views

A Power Stronger Than Itself - Alejandrocasales.com

A Power Stronger Than Itself - Alejandrocasales.com

A Power Stronger Than Itself - Alejandrocasales.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Origins, Antecedents, Objectives, Methods : : xxix<br />

the history of music and the history of ideas. In fact, AACM members who<br />

published critical work in the 1970s and 1980s tended to take this approach.<br />

Leo Smith’s writings, notably his 1973 Notes (8 pieces) source a new world music:<br />

creative music, and his 1974 “(M1) American Music,” 12 were closely followed<br />

by Anthony Braxton’s massive three- volume Tri- Axium Writings, a<br />

work that, while clearly in dialogue with John Cage’s 1961 manifesto Silence,<br />

Amiri Baraka’s 1963 Blues People, and Karlheinz Stockhausen’s 1963 Texte zur<br />

Musik, extends considerably beyond each of these texts, both in length and<br />

in range of inquiry. For me, the works of these AACM members constituted<br />

sources of inspiration and instruction for my own research, as did Derek<br />

Bailey’s infl uential book, Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music. 13<br />

With these texts as antecedents, I felt that my goals could be better ac<strong>com</strong>plished<br />

by deploying methodologies associated with academic historical<br />

inquiry, rather than with journalistic models. Of course, this issue<br />

is connected with the writerly voice of the book. Early on, several good<br />

friends and colleagues were concerned that the book avoid “academese,” or<br />

the arcane jargon that these well- meaning people associated with scholarly<br />

books. These associates felt that using more accessible language would produce<br />

a friendly and nonthreatening introduction to the AACM and its work<br />

that would appeal to a wide audience. The jazz writer Stanley Dance was<br />

evidently a devotee of this approach, judging from his critique of two jazz<br />

studies anthologies published in the 1990s by fi lm scholar Krin Gabbard,<br />

Representing Jazz and Jazz among the Discourses:<br />

There is original thought here, but the reader is immediately confronted<br />

by the language academics apparently use to <strong>com</strong>municate with one<br />

another. Sometimes it reads like a translation from the German, at<br />

others that they are merely trying to impress or indulging in a verbal<br />

cutting contest. Here are a few of the words you should be prepared to<br />

encounter: hermeneutics, <strong>com</strong>modifi ed, contextualizing, conceptualize,<br />

hyperanimacy, taxonomic, metacritical, rhizome, perspectivizing, nomadology,<br />

indexical, polysemy, auratic, reifi cation, metonymic, synecdoche,<br />

biodegradability, interstitial, valorize, diegetic, allegoresis, grammatology,<br />

oracy, centripetality, and esemplastic. 14<br />

Dance felt that these kinds of words “obviously impose considerable restraint<br />

on the transfer of knowledge.” 15 Girding against what he saw (correctly)<br />

as an attack on his métier, the writer grumbled that “the academics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!