27.03.2013 Views

An illicit alcohol production center in rural Bangalore - Nimhans

An illicit alcohol production center in rural Bangalore - Nimhans

An illicit alcohol production center in rural Bangalore - Nimhans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

The frequency of use however varies between men and women, with men dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g more frequently<br />

than the women. However the difference though significant should be viewed aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

perspective that both men and women consumers were dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g fairly frequently. While almost<br />

70% of the men drank daily or almost daily 55% of the women consumers did so too. This can<br />

hardly be termed “<strong>in</strong>frequent” dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. This is contrary to earlier reports that assert that the<br />

prevalent pattern is <strong>in</strong>frequent use of large quantities [Saxena,1999; Isaac,1998].<br />

The pattern that beg<strong>in</strong>s to emerge is that while the prevalence of <strong>alcohol</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g is still fairly low,<br />

among those who do dr<strong>in</strong>k, consumption is fairly frequent and heavy.<br />

This is similar to what has been observed <strong>in</strong> Slavic and Scand<strong>in</strong>avian cultures [Room,2002]. The<br />

difference lies <strong>in</strong> the fact that the prevalence of users is still very low.<br />

Under-socialized and solitary dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of ma<strong>in</strong>ly spirits marks the pattern of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g; dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>toxication and other features of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g found <strong>in</strong> dry cultures is the signature pattern<br />

39<br />

44<br />

Even<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(almost every<br />

day)<br />

19.5<br />

23<br />

Return<strong>in</strong>g<br />

home from<br />

work<br />

13.4<br />

12.4<br />

Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Situations<br />

3.7<br />

Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g situations<br />

a. Sett<strong>in</strong>gs and activities associated with dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

The sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> which most dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g occurred was essentially under-socialized and solitary. For men<br />

most dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g appeared to occur after work, before com<strong>in</strong>g home, <strong>in</strong> male oriented pubs, bars or<br />

liquor shops essentially among strangers or dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g acqua<strong>in</strong>tances. A fairly large number drank<br />

alone on streets or deserted places. Very rarely was dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g done at home. Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> bars or<br />

taverns are related to higher levels of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and self reported dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g problems (S<strong>in</strong>gle and<br />

Wortley, 1993). Respondents who predom<strong>in</strong>antly drank <strong>in</strong> bars, pubs or <strong>in</strong> solitude were<br />

significantly more likely to have a more hazardous pattern of <strong>alcohol</strong> use (estimated by scores on<br />

12.7<br />

Weekends Go<strong>in</strong>g out with<br />

friends<br />

4.9<br />

3.9<br />

Festivals,<br />

marriages, etc.<br />

17.1<br />

3.5<br />

Relax<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

home<br />

Female<br />

Male<br />

2.4<br />

Other<br />

0.6<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!