27.03.2013 Views

port henderson : past & present - Royal Commission on the Ancient ...

port henderson : past & present - Royal Commission on the Ancient ...

port henderson : past & present - Royal Commission on the Ancient ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appears <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1891 census.<br />

Re<str<strong>on</strong>g>present</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> to Sir Kenneth Mackenzie<br />

A letter written from Port Henders<strong>on</strong>, Gairloch, dated March 11 th 1887 from <strong>the</strong> Crofters of Port<br />

Henders<strong>on</strong> to Sir Kenneth S. Mackenzie :<br />

‘Sir<br />

The Crofters of <strong>the</strong> three townships met in <strong>the</strong> Opinan Public school <strong>on</strong> friday <strong>the</strong> 4 th inst. to see what we<br />

would do about <strong>the</strong> hill <str<strong>on</strong>g>past</str<strong>on</strong>g>ure, and we were all as <strong>on</strong>e man. Two delegates from each township were<br />

appointed to meet with <strong>the</strong> factor <strong>on</strong> Tuesday till <strong>the</strong>y would see <strong>the</strong> marches. when <strong>the</strong>y met <strong>on</strong> tuesday<br />

<strong>the</strong> factor told <strong>the</strong> Port<str<strong>on</strong>g>henders<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> delegates that <strong>the</strong> Erradale Crofters would not give us <strong>the</strong> hill-<str<strong>on</strong>g>past</str<strong>on</strong>g>ure,<br />

please let us know if it is by your order <strong>the</strong>y are keeping <strong>the</strong> hill <str<strong>on</strong>g>past</str<strong>on</strong>g>ure from us. Your petiti<strong>on</strong>ers will<br />

much oblidge by your immediate reply.’<br />

This was written in a well formed hand by Duncan McKenzie of croft 4 and signed by <strong>the</strong> following :<br />

Widow Alx McKenzie (14), Widow K. McKenzie (6), Kenneth McPhers<strong>on</strong> (7), Widow A. McMillan (of<br />

probably 21), D<strong>on</strong>ald McPhers<strong>on</strong> (2), Hector McKenzie (10), D<strong>on</strong>ald McKenzie (19), Alexander<br />

McPhers<strong>on</strong> (20), John McLean (18), John MacKenzie (8), Roderick Mckenzie (15), W. Murdo McKenzie<br />

(16), Widow R. Urquhart (17), Kenneth McPhers<strong>on</strong> (11), Kenneth McPhers<strong>on</strong> (9), Kenneth McLennan (12),<br />

Murdo Fraser (22), Alex McRae (5)<br />

Nearly every croft was re<str<strong>on</strong>g>present</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed. The omissi<strong>on</strong>s are crofts 1, 3 and 13. Checking with <strong>the</strong> census<br />

forms of 1881 and 1891 it can be seen croft 1’s head of household was a Ca<strong>the</strong>rine McPhers<strong>on</strong><br />

(although <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> possibility that she was c<strong>on</strong>nected to <strong>the</strong> McPhers<strong>on</strong>s of croft 2) and croft 3 was<br />

subsumed with croft 4. Croft 13 was tenanted by Andrew Wats<strong>on</strong> and his family and <strong>the</strong>re appears to<br />

be no reas<strong>on</strong> why he was not <strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> signatories.<br />

The crofters received a reply from Kenneth S. Mackenzie, dated 14 th March 1887 and headed<br />

C<strong>on</strong>an House, Ross-Shire N.B. It is written in ra<strong>the</strong>r a scrawling hand as if dashed off quite quickly<br />

with <strong>the</strong> occasi<strong>on</strong>al crossing out and rewriting.<br />

‘Mr Duncan Mackenzie No. 4 Port Henders<strong>on</strong> Sir<br />

I am in receipt of your letter of <strong>the</strong> 11 th inst. - signed also by a number of <strong>the</strong> Port-<str<strong>on</strong>g>henders<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> tenants, -<br />

saying that “<strong>the</strong> crofters of <strong>the</strong> three townships met in <strong>the</strong> Opinan Public School <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4 th inst. to see<br />

what <strong>the</strong>y would do about <strong>the</strong> hill, and <strong>the</strong>y were all agreed as <strong>on</strong>e man : but that when <strong>the</strong>y met Mr<br />

Mackenzie <strong>the</strong> Estate Manager <strong>on</strong> (Binne Bhric) <strong>the</strong> hill <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 8 th he said that <strong>the</strong> Erradale Crofters would<br />

not give you a share of <strong>the</strong> (hill) <str<strong>on</strong>g>past</str<strong>on</strong>g>ure. As <strong>the</strong> Erradale people were (also in Binne Bhric) <str<strong>on</strong>g>present</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>re<br />

that day it seems extraordinary that you should have accepted an expressi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong>ir views from ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

pers<strong>on</strong> without asking <strong>the</strong>mselves about it. It is evident that <strong>the</strong>re must be more in <strong>the</strong> matter than your letter<br />

discloses, but I expect Mr. Mackenzie will be down at <strong>the</strong> market, and when I have seen him, and have come<br />

to understand <strong>the</strong> questi<strong>on</strong> I will again write to you. So far as I am c<strong>on</strong>cerned I am ready to agree to what <strong>the</strong><br />

Crofters may agree <strong>on</strong>, about <strong>the</strong> sharing of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>past</str<strong>on</strong>g>ure; but if my advice were asked I would say that Port<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!