28.03.2013 Views

Mynydd y Gwair Wind Farm - RWE.com

Mynydd y Gwair Wind Farm - RWE.com

Mynydd y Gwair Wind Farm - RWE.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P a g e | 160<br />

<strong>Mynydd</strong> y <strong>Gwair</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Construction of control building and substation <strong>com</strong>pound at Blaen Gerdinen.<br />

Localised works of vegetation removal and excavation associated with widening existing<br />

metalled roads and or upgrading existing tracks or paths along the access route<br />

connecting the site to the A48 at Pontarddulais.<br />

Indirect Impact Sources<br />

9.6.18 Possible indirect effects on habitats are essentially limited to temporary dust deposition or<br />

localised disruption to soil water levels affecting vegetation close to access tracks or<br />

construction areas together with the potential for watercourses and ditch systems to be<br />

affected by increased silt loads arising from areas disturbed by construction operations.<br />

Similar effects could also arise from any de-watering operations connected with excavations<br />

for piling and base-slab construction. In the long term, changes in vegetation could arise from<br />

alteration to substrate and other effects occasioned by the new track network and platform<br />

areas beneath turbines.<br />

9.6.19 The principal secondary impact source for non-avian fauna relates to the potential for bats to<br />

collide with wind turbines. There is also the potential for the presence of turbines (and<br />

associated factors such as shadow flicker and any perceived change in the „openness‟ of the<br />

site) to lead to effective displacement of site use by higher fauna through avoidance<br />

behaviour.<br />

Construction Phase<br />

9.6.20 The potential for significant effects on habitat resources from the siting of turbines, access<br />

roads and other wind farm <strong>com</strong>ponents has been minimised by confining such features<br />

wherever possible to degraded examples of upland vegetation that are assessed as of value<br />

only on the immediate local scale. Even where affecting areas that might be considered to<br />

meet the definitions contained within the local Biodiversity Action Plans for heath, acid<br />

grassland and other habitats, the area of such habitats affected is small, both in absolute and<br />

relative terms. A proportion of this landtake is expected to be temporary, lasting only for the<br />

duration of the construction phase, and thereby giving rise to short-term impacts. Whilst the<br />

remainder is a long term impact, only reversing once the wind farm site has been<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioned and restored, it is minor in magnitude and in the context of the limited value<br />

of the habitats, not of significance at anything above the immediate local (i.e. site-wide) scale.<br />

The integrity of the Pentwyn Mawr and <strong>Mynydd</strong> Psygodlyn proposed Site of Importance for<br />

Nature Conservation, if adopted, would not be <strong>com</strong>promised by the presence of the wind farm<br />

(confidence: certain).<br />

9.6.21 Similarly, amendments to the design mean that areas of peat deposits greater than 300mm in<br />

depth are only affected in a handful of areas, and here they will be retained in-situ through<br />

use of „floating track‟ construction techniques. The total volume of peat excavated during the<br />

construction phase has therefore been restricted to approximately 20,000m3. As detailed in<br />

the Draft Construction Management Plan (Appendix 4.2) the entirety of this will be re-used in<br />

restoration on site. Because some loss of peat is likely to be inevitable as a consequence of<br />

this disruption, predicted impacts on this County value resource fall within the „moderate‟<br />

category of magnitude. Confidence in this prediction is tempered by the possibility of such<br />

losses being <strong>com</strong>pensated to some degree over the long term by recovery of peat forming<br />

processes in areas „re-wetted‟ (e.g. as a consequence of track alignments locally intercepting<br />

current erosion gullies) Because of such uncertainties as to the magnitude of any negative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!