Services that Manage the Care Needs of Drunk - Scottish Government
Services that Manage the Care Needs of Drunk - Scottish Government
Services that Manage the Care Needs of Drunk - Scottish Government
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Reduced levels <strong>of</strong> domestic violence and o<strong>the</strong>r problems associated with<br />
alcohol abuse and<br />
• Reduced burden on hospitals because <strong>of</strong> fewer hospitalisations for alcoholrelated<br />
illnesses and accidents.<br />
Acceptability<br />
2.68 A number <strong>of</strong> Australian reports indicated <strong>that</strong> sobering-up services are<br />
generally valued and well-accepted by clients and <strong>the</strong> police 62 as well as by<br />
local communities. 63 However, as mentioned in paragraph 2.12 above, it is<br />
important to actively seek community involvement in <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se services.<br />
Cost-effectiveness<br />
2.69 Sobering-up services in Australia were also perceived to be cost-effective. For<br />
example, <strong>the</strong> Drug and Alcohol Office <strong>of</strong> Western Australia has reported <strong>that</strong>,<br />
in 2005, <strong>the</strong> 14 sobering-up services in <strong>that</strong> state had a combined cost <strong>of</strong><br />
$3,547,190 (Australian dollars) – roughly equivalent to £1.5m, using <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong><br />
exchange for June 2007, when <strong>the</strong> report was written. This represented an<br />
annual average cost per centre <strong>of</strong> $253,370 (or £107,452) and an average<br />
$183 (or £77.61) per admission. 64<br />
2.70 This report went on to state <strong>that</strong> sobering-up services were considered to be<br />
“very cost-effective as <strong>the</strong>y avoid costs <strong>that</strong> would o<strong>the</strong>rwise be incurred if<br />
people had been detained or admitted to a hospital” (p. A-12).<br />
2.71 However, a report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot shelter in Canberra made <strong>the</strong><br />
point <strong>that</strong> “a sobering-up facility is not a cheap option”. 65 Cost-effectiveness<br />
depends partly on <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility, but it also depends on <strong>the</strong> facility<br />
being well-used.<br />
Service users’ views<br />
2.72 The evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot sobering service in Canberra, <strong>the</strong> researchers<br />
carried out telephone interviews with a small number <strong>of</strong> clients <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> service<br />
following <strong>the</strong>ir use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> service. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main findings were <strong>that</strong>:<br />
• Most clients mentioned <strong>that</strong> <strong>the</strong> beds were comfortable and <strong>that</strong> <strong>the</strong>y felt<br />
safe and cared for<br />
• Several indicated <strong>that</strong> <strong>the</strong> staff were “pr<strong>of</strong>essional”, “reassuring” and easy to<br />
talk to<br />
• All clients indicated <strong>that</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir privacy and confidentiality were respected<br />
• Those who mentioned <strong>that</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir alternative would have been police cells,<br />
were very pleased with <strong>the</strong> shelter<br />
62 Loxley et al, 2004.<br />
63 Brady et al, 2006; Allen-Kelly et al, 2006.<br />
64 <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> Western Australia, 2007.<br />
65 Allen-Kelly et al, 2006.<br />
21