02.04.2013 Views

WHO ARE THE GERMANS - Churches of God Cyber Auxiliary

WHO ARE THE GERMANS - Churches of God Cyber Auxiliary

WHO ARE THE GERMANS - Churches of God Cyber Auxiliary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Who are the Germans?<br />

37. Sardanapalles 20<br />

38. Ninos 19<br />

* shared reign with his father and uncles ** he was king during Troy's war with Greece<br />

<strong>THE</strong> ASSYRIAN SUCCESSION OF AKKAD<br />

As we shall see later, Sargon, who founded the Akkadian Empire, absorbed the Neo-Sumerian culture and adopted the<br />

Sumerian pantheon. The Akkadians spoke a Semitic language which linguists allocate to the eastern branch <strong>of</strong> Semitic.<br />

Under Sargon the language spread, later dividing into Babylonian and Assyrian.xxxii<br />

Not only was the speech and writing system <strong>of</strong> Akkad so widely spread, but so was the Sumero-Akkadian system<br />

<strong>of</strong> commerce, political government, legal custom and jurisprudence. Although political and military control<br />

changed hands from city to city and monarch to monarch through the centuries, the basic elements <strong>of</strong> these<br />

systems remained intact.xxxiii<br />

Yes, the basic principle <strong>of</strong> Banking, Big Corporations, overly Centralised Governments, Authoritarianism and alo<strong>of</strong>style<br />

monarchies, may be traced back to Sargon. Here was the post flood beginnings <strong>of</strong> predatory, imperialistic and<br />

militaristic fascism!<br />

Historian Oppenheim concurs:<br />

Not only did the Sumerian dynasty <strong>of</strong> Ur (called Ur III) follow Sargon's example, but the Assyrian kings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

next Millennium took him as their prototype and the image on which to model their political aspirations.xxxiv<br />

His descendants, the Akkadians, called themselves and their language after the capital <strong>of</strong> the empire, Akkad.xxxv Their<br />

royal names and tradition <strong>of</strong> empire evidently lived on in Assyria.xxxvi Unfortunately, archaeologists have been<br />

unsuccessful to date in their attempts to locate Akkad or Agade but it is evidently close to Babylon.xxxvii Ah! for that<br />

discovery to be made —for then much more would be revealed about Sargon and the Akkadians.<br />

Let us now see what historians have to say concerning the very close relationship between the Akkadians and<br />

Assyrians:<br />

the question arises whether the Akkadians did not have a more solid base <strong>of</strong> operations in Assyria than they had<br />

in Babylonia. In fact, in many respects the impression the Akkadians left in Assyria was deep and permanent.<br />

In so far as the language is concerned, Old Assyrian is the only Akkadian dialect which has preserved certain<br />

features typical <strong>of</strong> the Old Akkadian language. . .certain personal names are common to Old Akkadian and Old<br />

Assyrian ... The use by the Assyrians <strong>of</strong> typically Old Akkadian names is <strong>of</strong> particular significance ... the use <strong>of</strong><br />

Old Akkadian names in the Old Assyrian period can be taken to indicate that many <strong>of</strong> the prominent Old<br />

Assyrian families proudly traced their ancestors back to Old Akkadians.<br />

The most significant impact, however, which the Akkadians left in Assyria was ideological. Whereas in<br />

Babylonia the memory <strong>of</strong> the Sargonic kings was despised and their actions condemned as <strong>of</strong>fensive to their<br />

national god, the Assyrians throughout their history cherished their memory and tried to emulate them.<br />

Whereas in Babylonia they were remembered as foreign conquerors, the later Assyrians thought <strong>of</strong> them as their<br />

very own. Foremost among the ideas which, in the eyes <strong>of</strong> later generations, were embodied by the kings <strong>of</strong><br />

Akkad was the creation <strong>of</strong> a universal empire, comprising what later princes used to call kissat matati, 'the<br />

totality <strong>of</strong> the countries'. Rarely was a Babylonian king interested in 'widening the bounds <strong>of</strong> his country'; with<br />

the exception <strong>of</strong> some Kassites, who were influenced by Assyrian ideas, they did not use titles such as sar kissati,<br />

'king <strong>of</strong> the universe', sar kibrat erbettim, 'king <strong>of</strong> the four regions (<strong>of</strong> the world)', etc. The Assyrians, on the<br />

contrary, were expansion-minded throughout their history. As will be pointed out in greater detail below, the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> the empire builders Sargon and Naram-Sin was for the Assyrians a golden age, for the eventual return <strong>of</strong><br />

which they hoped at periodic intervals; whenever computations revealed that the time was approaching when a<br />

new universal empire would materialize comprising all the lands 'from the Upper Sea where the sun sets to the<br />

Lower Sea where the sun rises’, a king <strong>of</strong> Assyria chose the throne name Sargon ... The first Assyrian ruler who<br />

adopted both the title sarrum 'king' and the more ambitious and programmatic 'king <strong>of</strong> the universe' was<br />

Shamshi-Adad I, who actually assembled an empire <strong>of</strong> impressive proportions under his sceptre; the last was<br />

Nabonidus, king <strong>of</strong> Babylon, who tried to emulate his illustrious ancestor, Esarhaddon.<br />

The Assyrian rulers showed their reverence for Sargon and Naram-Sin not only by their conquests. The<br />

Babylonians bitterly resented it when a king built his residence in a city other than Babylon; this resentment is<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!