02.04.2013 Views

Theosophy in the Qabbālāh - The Theosophical Society

Theosophy in the Qabbālāh - The Theosophical Society

Theosophy in the Qabbālāh - The Theosophical Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28 / <strong><strong>The</strong>osophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qabbãlãh<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Unity of <strong>the</strong> Ten Sephiroth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves, which is<br />

always concentrated <strong>in</strong> A<strong>in</strong> Soph, from A<strong>in</strong> Soph to <strong>the</strong> A<strong>in</strong><br />

Soph. . . . Remember that some of <strong>the</strong> Qabbalists compare<br />

it (<strong>the</strong> Unity) to a cha<strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g an un<strong>in</strong>terrupted unity by<br />

its jo<strong>in</strong>ed l<strong>in</strong>ks; . . .<br />

This is a graphic symbol of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner be<strong>in</strong>g of planets<br />

and stars, described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>osophy as a planetary and/or solar<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> of globes. Each sêfîrãh or “l<strong>in</strong>k” ( be it globe, planet,<br />

or sun) is with<strong>in</strong> its own realm an <strong>in</strong>dependent, self-conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

entity, composed of its own substance and manifest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

its unique character; none<strong>the</strong>less each sêfîrãh is bound<br />

with <strong>the</strong> whole and with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sêfîrõth or “l<strong>in</strong>ks” <strong>in</strong> unbreakable<br />

unity. In <strong>The</strong> Secret Doctr<strong>in</strong>e (2:23) HPB writes:<br />

“In <strong>the</strong> ancient Cosmogonies, <strong>the</strong> visible and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>visible<br />

worlds are <strong>the</strong> double l<strong>in</strong>ks of one and <strong>the</strong> same cha<strong>in</strong>,”<br />

i.e., <strong>the</strong> upper sêfîrõth and <strong>the</strong> lower, <strong>the</strong> “<strong>in</strong>visible” and<br />

<strong>the</strong> “visible,” are all, <strong>in</strong>dividually and collectively, l<strong>in</strong>ks of<br />

<strong>the</strong> one cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second illustration likens <strong>the</strong> sêfîrõth “to various<br />

waters issu<strong>in</strong>g from one source, and separat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to many<br />

rivers, which become (aga<strong>in</strong>) united <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ocean; from<br />

whence <strong>the</strong>y return aga<strong>in</strong>, from beneath <strong>the</strong> earth, to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

former divisions; and so on <strong>in</strong> an un<strong>in</strong>terrupted unity; . . .”<br />

(Myer). On this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong> Zohar says:<br />

<strong>The</strong> form <strong>in</strong> which he is generally depicted is to be compared<br />

to a very expansive sea; for <strong>the</strong> waters of <strong>the</strong> sea are <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves without a limit or form, and it is only when <strong>the</strong>y<br />

spread <strong>the</strong>mselves upon <strong>the</strong> earth that <strong>the</strong>y assume a form<br />

( -wymd [dimyõn]). We can now make <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g calculation:<br />

<strong>the</strong> source of <strong>the</strong> sea’s water and <strong>the</strong> water stream pro-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!