03.04.2013 Views

An Assessment of the SRTM Topographic Products - Jet Propulsion ...

An Assessment of the SRTM Topographic Products - Jet Propulsion ...

An Assessment of the SRTM Topographic Products - Jet Propulsion ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 1. OVERVIEW 16<br />

is as discussed in in great detail in Section 5.1. The residual geolocation errors are discussed<br />

in Section 5.2.<br />

Figure 1.2: Post-calibration height error residuals for a long ocean data take. The values shown<br />

are cross-track averages for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four <strong>SRTM</strong> beams. The time scale shown corresponds to a<br />

spatial scale <strong>of</strong> approximately 9000 km<br />

1.3.2 Reduction <strong>of</strong> Static and Dynamic Errors<br />

The residual errors described in Section 1.3.1 can be compensated in three ways:<br />

Along-Track Calibration: Estimate <strong>the</strong> beam to beam height discontinuities, as described above.<br />

Dynamic Calibration: Use <strong>the</strong> know ocean topography (including tidal effects) to estimate static<br />

phase screens and time changing residual phase and roll errors and to generate ocean ground<br />

control points.<br />

Mosaic: Use <strong>the</strong> calibration data, toge<strong>the</strong>r with o<strong>the</strong>r GCPs (including a subset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kinematic<br />

GPS GCPs), and pass-to-pass tie-points, to perform a continent scale weighted least squares<br />

adjustment to reduce residual height errors. The mosaic correction estimates system phase<br />

(or, equivalently, roll) errors, and corrects <strong>the</strong> data in height and position given <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />

phase errors. The adjustment implies that residual errors will have some correlation over long<br />

scales. Due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> an extensive GCP data base in continent interiors, <strong>the</strong> errors are<br />

best constrained at <strong>the</strong> oceans and less constrained in <strong>the</strong> interiors.<br />

As an example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mosaic/calibration error reduction, Figure 1.4 shows <strong>the</strong> errors after static<br />

calibration, but prior to least-squares adjustments. The dominant errors are swath to swath differences,<br />

as is evident from <strong>the</strong> obvious swath patterns in <strong>the</strong> data. Figure 1.5 shows <strong>the</strong> residual<br />

errors after adjustments. This figure shows that most swath discontinuities have disappeared, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!