03.04.2013 Views

Transformers - Colloquy

Transformers - Colloquy

Transformers - Colloquy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

C O L L O Q U Y / Volume 18, Issue 1, 2010<br />

T H E P R A C T I T I O N E R ’ S P E R S P E C T I V E<br />

High Noon<br />

How card issuers can rally support and<br />

regain loyalty-program trust<br />

B Y K E L L Y H L A V I N K A<br />

IF THE MOST FREQUENT QUESTION POSED<br />

to COLLOQUY this year is any<br />

indication, the clock seems to be<br />

ticking toward a financial services<br />

high noon. “What’s the future of<br />

credit and debit card rewards<br />

programs?” we hear over and over.<br />

“Are they living on borrowed time?”<br />

Several factors are converging to<br />

prompt this persistent question.<br />

And, the underlying question is<br />

if issuers can continue happily<br />

doling out rewards and benefits to<br />

loyal cardholders given the dramatic<br />

stand off between issuers and<br />

consumer interests. Those factors<br />

include:<br />

1. The Credit CARD Act of 2009—<br />

largely in place effective Feb. 22,<br />

2010—has changed how the<br />

industry goes about its business.<br />

Some issuers are turning to<br />

additional fees not covered by the<br />

Act, including charging for account<br />

dormancy. The final two phases<br />

of the Act, requiring clearer,<br />

shorter disclosures and consumer<br />

notifications—as well as new<br />

protections for retail gift cards—will<br />

be in place by the third quarter of<br />

2010. In the coming months, the<br />

media will naturally continue to<br />

scrutinize how the banks react,<br />

particularly with the speculation that<br />

more cards–especially rewards<br />

cards—will institute an annual fee.<br />

After all, such fees will certainly<br />

subdue interest in the affected cards.<br />

2. Recent populist uproar has<br />

portrayed banks as conniving<br />

tricksters that must be put in<br />

their place. At the very least, such<br />

sentiment can lead to skepticism<br />

about the motivations behind<br />

rewards programs. But the uproar is<br />

also leading to calls for regulation<br />

beyond the CARD Act—regulation<br />

that will further suppress creditcard<br />

income and the ability to<br />

fund such programs. In some<br />

cases, the uproar takes the form<br />

of consumer move ments like that<br />

of creditcardrevolt.com, which claims<br />

that the entire credit card model is<br />

immoral and calls for reforms such<br />

as capping credit card interest<br />

rates at 15%. In other cases, there<br />

are corporate move ments aimed at<br />

garnering popular support—take,<br />

for instance, 7-Eleven’s drive to<br />

entice a million customers to sign a<br />

petition calling for Congressional<br />

action against “unfair and excessive<br />

credit card transaction fees.”<br />

3. The gnashing of teeth about<br />

whether Congress should regulate<br />

interchange fees won’t go away.<br />

Calls for governmental intervention<br />

on aspects of the “merchant discount<br />

fee” (or interchange fee) charged<br />

when a retailer or service provider<br />

accepts a credit or debit card as<br />

Bright Times at Their Peak?<br />

COLLOQUY’s most recent loyalty<br />

census shows astounding growth<br />

in program memberships in the<br />

financial sector, threatening to<br />

eclipse the membership tallies<br />

in the long-time leader, the travel<br />

sector. On the other hand, are<br />

the bright times beginning to slip<br />

back into the travel shadow<br />

after high noon?<br />

Source: 2009 COLLOQUY Loyalty Census<br />

164% growth<br />

in the first half<br />

of the decade<br />

90.5<br />

million<br />

2000<br />

payment have been loud lately.<br />

Congressman Barney Frank,<br />

chairman of the House Financial<br />

Services Committee, claims that such<br />

regulation “is not on the agenda<br />

this year,” and Senator Arlen<br />

Specter responds by saying he’s<br />

“seriously considering” introducing<br />

a bill for such regulation. If such<br />

legislation were seriously pursued,<br />

the underlying business model of<br />

using a loyalty program to attract<br />

and retain cardholders would be<br />

demolished.<br />

We’ve already seen such impact, in<br />

Australia when regulators imposed<br />

interchange fee limits in 2003. As<br />

Todd J. Zywicki, a law professor at<br />

George Mason University, noted in<br />

The Wall Street Journal: “Annual fees<br />

increased an average of 22% on<br />

standard credit cards and annual<br />

fees for rewards cards increased by<br />

47%-77%. Card issuers also reduced<br />

the generosity of their reward<br />

programs by 23%. Innovation,<br />

especially in terms of improved<br />

security and identity-theft<br />

protection, was stalled. Card issuers<br />

also increased their efforts to attract<br />

higher-risk customers who generate<br />

interest and penalty fees to offset<br />

lower interchange revenues from<br />

lower-risk transactional users.”<br />

23% of all program<br />

memberships<br />

Up 77% since<br />

previous Census<br />

238.8<br />

million<br />

2006<br />

422.0<br />

million<br />

2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!