04.04.2013 Views

The Mavuradonha Layered Complex: Neoproterozoic ... - ArchiMeD

The Mavuradonha Layered Complex: Neoproterozoic ... - ArchiMeD

The Mavuradonha Layered Complex: Neoproterozoic ... - ArchiMeD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Analytical methods 34<br />

wavelength dispersive mode with a focused beam of about 2 µm. Matrix corrections were<br />

made with the EPMA internal φρz correction program.<br />

Structural formulae and endmembers of minerals were calculated following the<br />

procedure described in Deer et al. (1986) for plagioclase, in Morimoto et al. (1988) for<br />

pyroxene, in Spear (1993) for garnet, and in Leake et al. (1997) for amphibole. Structural<br />

formulae of scapolites are calculated following the recommendations of Shaw (1960) and<br />

Teertstra & Sherriff (1997), whereas endmembers are defined as suggested by<br />

Shaw (1960) and Ellis (1978). Fe 3+ corrections in pyroxene, amphibole and garnet<br />

formulae followed the procedure of Droop (1987). Mineral abbreviations follow the<br />

suggestions of Kretz (1983).<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmobarometry<br />

Temperature calculations were performed using the garnet-pyroxene<br />

geothermometer of Ellis & Green (1979) and Krogh (1988) and the garnet-hornblende<br />

geothermometer of Graham & Powell (1984). Pressures were calculated applying the<br />

geobarometers of Newton & Perkins (1982), Powell & Holland (1985; 1988), Holland &<br />

Powell (1985) and Eckert et al. (1991) and using the mineral assemblage garnetclinopyroxene-plagioclase-quartz.<br />

<strong>The</strong> geobarometer of Kohn and Spear (1989) was used<br />

for pressure calculations of the assemblage garnet-hornblende-plagioclase-quartz.<br />

Total iron was assumed to be ferrous iron for PT-estimates following the<br />

suggestions of Schuhmacher (1991) and Canil & O’Neill (1996). This is because of the<br />

still unsolved problem of ferric iron estimation in many ferromagnesian minerals as<br />

mentioned by several authors (e.g., Bucher & Frey, 1994; Krogh Ravna, 2000;<br />

Schumacher, 1991). Comparative studies (Canil & O’Neill, 1996; McCammon et al., 1998)<br />

between Mössbauer spectrometry and the method of Droop (1987) have shown that ferric<br />

iron calculations for pyroxenes which are based on stoichiometry lead to imprecise ferric<br />

iron estimations caused by higher SiO2 levels and lower total iron contents compared with<br />

spinel or garnet. Ferric iron estimates based on the method described by Droop (1987) may<br />

lead to erroneous results in thermobarometry, due to the extreme sensitivity to microprobe<br />

errors. Most of the geothermobarometers used in this study are calibrated using<br />

experimental materials and/or natural assemblages with poorly constrained amounts of<br />

ferric iron.<br />

To obtain information about the PT evolution, quantitative PT-conditions have been<br />

evaluated applying the TWEEQ/TWQ (<strong>The</strong>rmobarometry With Estimation of<br />

EQUilibration state) computer application of Berman (1991) versions 1.02b (for garnetamphibole-plagioclase<br />

calculations) and 2.02 (garnet-clinopyroxene-plagioclase). This<br />

enables the combination of the PT estimates with mineral reactions deduced from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!