John Lentini presentation at Court of Inquiry hearing

Court of Inquiry 

Exhibits to the Testimony of 

John J. Lentini, CFEI, D-ABC 

Scientific Fire Analysis 

Big Pine Key, FL 

1

Information available to the State of Texas on 

February 13, 2004 

2

Gerald Hurst Affidavit 

Information available on 2/13/04: Hurst analysis 

3

―Most of the conclusions reached by the Fire 

Marshal would be considered invalid in light 

of current knowledge.‖ 


5

Trailers, pour patterns and puddle 

configurations 

Cannot be identified as accelerant burns in a 

fully involved compartment on the basis of 

visual appearance alone. 


6

Free Burning Stage 

Figure 3.5.3.2 (a) Early compartment fire development. 

7

Hot Gas Layer Forms 

development in compartment fire. 

8

Radiation Sends Heat DOWN 

Figure 3.5.3.2 (c) Pre-flashover conditions in compartment fire. 

9

Flashover Occurs, Igniting Everything 

10

Full Room Involvement 

11

Full Room Involvement 

Note the fire burning under the furniture 

12

Multiple Origins 

Can only be identified when the areas of fire 

damage are isolated from on another. All of 

the damage in this fire was contiguous. There 

is no credible evidence to conclude that there 

was more than one origin. 


22


The finding of multiple origins was 

inappropriate even in the context of the state 

of the art in 1991. 


23

V-Patterns 

While there is sometimes a V-pattern at the 

point of origin (usually when the origin is next 

to a wall), the finding of a V-pattern does not 

necessarily indicate the point of origin. 


24

V-Patterns 

As with irregular patterns on the floor, once 

flashover occurs, the meaning of V-patterns 

becomes obscured by new patterns caused by 

the ignition of new fuel packages. 


25

Burned wood under the aluminum threshold 

This cannot be caused by accelerants, because 

the threshold would ―smother‖ any fire on 

burning accelerant, much like a lid on a skillet 

will smother a grease fire. 


26

Tiles burned by accelerant burning 

underneath 

This is no more likely than wood burning 

under the aluminum threshold. 


28

Crazed glass 

This is an old wives‘ tale. Crazed glass does 

not indicate rapid heating—it can only be 

caused by rapid cooling. 


30

Brown rings on the cement porch 

These do not establish the presence of 

accelerant, and attempting to use the brown 

rings for that purpose amounts to baseless 

speculation. 


32

The positive sample 

The chemical composition of the ―accelerant‖ 

is consistent with the charcoal lighter fluid 

container found nearby. 


33

The positive sample 

None of the samples collected from the alleged 

―pour patterns‖ inside the house tested 

positive. 


35

Ed Cheever 2004 quote in Chicago Tribune 

―At the time of the Corsicana fire, we were 

still testifying to things that aren‘t accurate 

today,‖ Cheever told Mills. ―They were true 

then, but they aren‘t now.‖ Cheever added 

that ―Hurst was pretty much right on … We 

now know not to make those same 

assumptions.‖ 

36

Timing is Everything 

Had Governor Perry asked Mr. Cheever 

about Dr. Hurst‘s analysis in February 

2004, it is likely that Mr. Cheever would 

have provided the same answer that he 

provided to Chicago Tribune reporter Steve 

Mills in December 2004. 

37

Arson Review Committee 

John J. Lentini, CFEI, D-ABC, Chairman 

Scientific Fire Analysis, Big Pine Key, FL 

Douglas J. Carpenter, P. E. 

Combustion Science and Engineering, 

Columbia, MD 

Daniel L. Churchward, CFEI 

Kodiak Consulting, Ft. Wayne, IN 

David M. Smith, CFI 

Associated Fire Consultants, Bisbee, AZ 

Michael A. McKenzie, JD 

Cozen O‘Connor, Atlanta, GA 

39

Materials Reviewed 

Expert testimony from the trial 

Photographs of the scene 

52-minute video 

Underlying reports 

Laboratory results 

40

Testimony from the Willingham Trial 

―The first incendiary indicator is 

the auto ventilation. The 

inconsistency of the fire going out 

of this window and the fire going 

out of the door and this window 

where that‘s inconsistent with fire 

behavior. That‘s an indicator it‘s a 

possible incendiary fire.‖ 

-Manuel Vasquez, page 255 

ARC Report, page 12 

41

Actually, 

Window breakage is a common 

example of ―auto-ventilation‖ and is 

consistent with un-accelerated 

compartment fires. A classic example of 

window breakage in an un-accelerated 

compartment fire is shown in the NFPA 

video Fire Power, which was produced 

in 1985. 


42

And really, 

Mr. Willingham stated that he broke out 

the two front windows on the front porch 

using a pool cue. This information was 

apparently disregarded in Mr. Vasquez‘s 

analysis of this fire, but had significant 

implications with respect to any 

determination that ―auto-venting‖ was 

the ―first incendiary indicator‖. 


43


―All fire goes up. All water goes 

down. Or any liquid goes down 

unless man changes the course.‖ 

-Manuel Vasquez, page 232 


45

In a confined fire, like any fire 

inside a structure, the fire only 

goes up until it is obstructed by 

the ceiling. Then it begins to 

behave in a manner that is 

beyond the experience of most 

people. 

Actually, 

46


Q: And how many fires have you 

investigated since becoming a Certified 

Fire/Arson Investigator? 

A: Perhaps in the range of 1,200 to 1,500 

fires. 

Q: Of these 1,200 to 1,500 fires, how many 

turned out to be arson in your opinion? 

A: With the exception of a few, most all of 

them. -Manuel Vasquez , page 228 


47

TX SFMO Investigations, 1990-2004 


48


―The fire tells the story. I am just 

the interpreter. I am looking at the 

fire, and I am interpreting the fire. 

That is what I know. That is what I 

do best. And the fire does not lie. It 

tells me the truth. -Manuel Vasquez , page 244 


49


―I‘m taking the picture looking inside, and this 

time I‘m looking at the aluminum threshold. 

And aluminum melts at 1,200º normal. Wood 

fire does not exceed 800º. So to me, when 

aluminum melts, it shows me that it has a lot of 

intense heat. It reacts to it. That means its 

temperature is hot. The temperature cannot 

react. Therefore the only thing that can cause 

that to react is an accelerant. You know it makes 

the fire hotter. It‘s not normal fire.‖ 

-Manuel Vasquez , page 249 

ARC Report, page 11 50

Actually, 

1. The coolest part of any flame is 

approximately 500 o C (932 o F). 

2. Accelerated fires burn faster than non- 

accelerated fires, but they do not burn 

hotter. The temperature of a well- 

ventilated wood fire is the same as the 

temperature of a well-ventilated gasoline 

fire. 

51


Okay. Puddle configurations, pour patterns, low 

char burning, charred floor, the underneath 

burning of the baseboard, the brown stains on 

the concrete, the underneath of the bed, because 

of the fire right underneath the bed, puddle 

configurations in that area, and the total 

saturation of this floor is indicated with pour 

patterns, because that‘s all I‘m doing is looking 

at the facts, at the evidence. That‘s all I‘m 

using.‖ -Manuel Vasquez , page 255 


52


Mr. Vasquez attacks Mr. Willingham‘s 

truthfulness using circular logic. 

53




The absence of burning on Mr. Willingham‘s 

bare feet means there was no fire on the floor 

when he exited the house. 

54




The absence of burning on Mr. Willingham‘s 

bare feet means there was no fire on the floor 

when he exited the house. 

This is consistent with the neighbors‘ 

observations. 

55


Instead of considering the possibility that there 

was not fire on the floor early on, Mr. Vasquez 

concludes that Mr. Willingham was lying, and 

incidentally discards the data provided by the 

eyewitnesses. 

56


―The inconsistent thing that he said right away 

was that he had kicked the door to exit from the 

hallway with his bare foot…what he said he had 

done is inconsistent with the burn patterns in 

the house….The fire was set in three different 

places. So the fire did not set – it did not start by 

itself, and when he said that he had done this, 

and that it‘s, it‘s impossible for him to do what 

he did.‖ 

--Manuel Vasquez Testimony, page 260-261 

57


Q.: Would you, in your opinion -- would he have had 

injuries on other parts of his body? 

A.: On his feet. There was fire on the floor. 

Q.: He told you he kicked the doors; is that right? 

Q.:Yes, sir. He had no injuries on his feet. 

Q: Based on information that he was simply wearing blue 

jeans, no shirt, no shoes, would you have suspected there 

to be more injuries? 

A.:Yes, sir. If he was inside a hot, very hot 

house he would certainly receive some injuries. 

--Manuel Vasquez Testimony, page 267 

58


On the one hand, Mr. Vasquez states this was a 

―spur of the moment‖ fire. 

59


On the one hand, Mr. Vasquez states this was a 

―spur of the moment‖ fire. 

―The fire, itself, tells me that it‘s a very 

aggressive fire; and, therefore, the fire 

was not a planned fire. It was a spur-of- 

the-moment fire.‖ 

--Manuel Vasquez Testimony, page 72 

60


On the other hand, Mr. Vasquez states that the fire 

setter gave the combustible (not flammable) liquid 

at least five minutes to soak in. 

61


On the other hand, Mr. Vasquez states that the fire 

setter gave the combustible (not flammable) liquid 

at least five minutes to soak in. 

Q.: Could you explain how the puddle 

configurations were created in your opinion? 

A.:Yes, sir. The liquid, this one here, when the 

liquid was poured in this room, it was not 

ignited immediately. 

--Manuel Vasquez Testimony, page 256-257 

62


Q.: How do you know that? 

A.: Because it went -- it soaked through 

floor to the hardwood floor. It had time 

to soak. It took at least five minutes or 

more for that liquid to soak. 

--Manuel Vasquez Testimony, -257 

63


Q.: Based upon your investigation and 

your examination of the scene and your 

conclusions, can you tell what the 

arsonist intended to do by setting this 

fire? 

A.: Yes. 

Q.: What is that? 

A.: The intent was to kill the little girls. 

64

Excerpt from FM Vasquez‘s Report 

―The pieces of broken window glass on 

the ledge of the north windows to the 

northeast bedroom disclosed a crazed 

‗spider webbing‘ condition. This 

condition is an indication that the fire 

burned fast and hot.‖ 

-Manuel Vasquez report , page 4 


65

Actually, 

Crazing of glass is induced by rapid 

cooling. It cannot be induced by rapid 

heating. 

66

Dr. Craig Beyler‘s Report 

68

Floor Patterns 

Floor patterns cannot reliably be used as an 

arson indicator in fully developed fires. 

Burning foam rubber and melting plastics can 

create patterns that look like liquid spills. 

Laboratory analysis is necessary to determine 

if there is an accelerant present. 

Beyler Report 

70

Floor Patterns 

The floor patterns observed throughout the 

children‘s bedroom, in the hallway, and on the 

porch ―need not be associated with the cause of 

the fire at all.‖ Instead, the bedroom and 

hallway ―had simply been fully involved in 

flame,‖ such that the associated damage would 

be expected. 

Beyler Report 

71


The theory of multiple origins in the 

bedroom, hallway, and porch is 

inconsistent with early eyewitness 

testimony that no flames were visible on 

the porch when Mr. Willingham was 

already outside and that smoke flow from 

the hallway was modest initially. Beyler Report 

72

V Patterns 

A V pattern ―simply indicates burning at 

the base of the V at some time during the 

fire.‖ 

Beyler Report 

73

Melted Aluminum Threshold 

Far from being an indicator of 

accelerant or arson, flame temperatures 

from ordinary combustibles like wood 

produce temperatures sufficient to melt 

aluminum. 

Beyler Report 

74

Vinyl tile edge curling can occur in 

the absence of accelerants due to 

radiant heat. 

Tiles Burned from 

Accelerant Underneath 

Beyler Report 

75

Fire Marshal Vasquez‘s theory of 

auto-ventilation as an indicator of 

arson is ―inconsistent with modern 

fire science. Instead, natural fires 

are known to, and do, break out 

windows.‖ 

Auto-Ventilation 

Beyler Report 

76

Crazed glass likely results from the 

application of water to hot glass 

during firefighting. 

Crazed Glass 

For that reason, NFPA 921 does 

not accept crazed glass as an 

indicator of the use of accelerant. 

Beyler Report 

77

Brown Rings on Cement Porch 

Although the fire investigators considered 

brown rings to be a sign of an accelerant 

that was ignited to start the fire, no samples 

of the concrete were taken for analysis, and 

alternative causes, such as the damaged 

container of charcoal lighter fluid found at 

the scene, were not considered. 

Interpreting the brown stain as an accelerant 

pattern is simply ―without merit.‖ 

Beyler Report 

78

Neither NFPA 921 nor the fire 

science literature accept low burn 

on walls as a good indicator of 

ignitable liquids. 

Low Burn 

Beyler Report 

79

Predisposition to Find Arson 

FM Vasquez is unique among the 

investigators of both fires in his 

attitudes toward arson and fire scene 

examination. His statistics of the 

fraction of fires which are in fact arson 

are remarkable and far exceed any 

rational estimate. It reflects his 

predisposition to find arson in his cases. 

This directly violates NFPA 921 and 

professional norms in general. 

Beyler Report 

80

Methodology Assessment 

His quotations that ―The fire tells a 

story, I am just the interpreter,‖ and 

―the fire does not lie, it tells me the 

truth,‖ are hardly consistent with a 

scientific mindset and is more 

characteristic of mystics or psychics. 

Beyler Report 

81

Methodology Assessment 

The quotes separate the findings from 

his own judgment and seek to make him 

not responsible for his own 

interpretation. It seems to deny the role 

of rational reasoning. It is an 

expression of fire investigation as a 

mystical art rather than an application 

of science and reason. 

Beyler Report 

82

Expert Reviews 

Date Expert Venue 

Feb 13, 2004 Dr. Gerald Hurst Affidavit to TX officials 

Dec 9, 2004 Dr. John DeHaan Chicago Tribune 

May 2, 2006 Arson Review 

Committee 

John Lentini Chicago Tribune 

Report to TX FSC 

Aug 17, 2009 Dr. Craig Beyler Report to TX FSC 

Aug 20, 2010 Mark Goodson Letter to TX FSC 

83

Fire Marshal Maldonado‘s 

letter of 8/20/10 

84

―The State Fire Marshal's Office 

has spent a great deal of time and 

energy to ensure as thorough a 

response as possible. In reviewing 

documents and standards in place 

then and now, we stand by the 

original investigator's report and 

conclusions.‖ 

Maldonado 8/20/10 

85

Duty to 

Correct: 

IP Letter 10/20/10 

Bohan letter 10/22/10 

Gianelli letter 10/15/10 

86

Duty to 

Correct: 

If there is no error, the duty to correct 

goes away. 

87

But there WAS error 

―At the time of the Corsicana fire, we 

were still testifying to things that aren‘t 

accurate today,‖ Cheever told Mills. 

―They were true then, but they aren‘t 

now.‖ Cheever added that ―Hurst was 

pretty much right on … we now know 

not to make those same assumptions.‖ 

88

―Further, should the Commission 

make a finding of "flawed science" 

based on a comparison of what the 

investigator used at the time as the 

accepted standard and the standard 

as it exists today, we respectfully 

ask that it be articulated.‖ 


89

The ―standards‖ of 1991-92, such 

as they were, were seriously flawed, 

but even by the measure of the state 

of the art of 1991, some of the most 

important of Fire Marshal 

Vasquez‘s findings and conclusions 

fell well outside contemporary 

knowledge of fire behavior. 

90

―The SFMO agrees that NFPA 921 was 

not an official standard at the time of 

the investigation and testimony. Note, 

however, that many of the principals 

and practices utilized by SFMO and 

other arson investigators were the basis 

for what ultimately appeared in NFPA 

921. 


91

―The Commission should compare the 

principals [sic] and procedures (and 

science) documented by the fire 

investigators in 1991 and their 

testimony at trial in 1992, with NFPA 

921 as it first appeared in 1992, 1995 or 

NFPA 921 as it exists today. The SFMO 

investigator for the Willingham case 

used principals that can be linked to 

NFPA 921 standards subsequently put 

in place.‖ 


92

USDOJ, 1977 

93

Three years later… 

US Dept of Commerce, 

National Bureau of 

Standards 

94

Three years later… 

With significant input 

from the National Fire 

Academy 

95

4) Glass objects. 

including window glass, 

often will give clues 

as to a fire's location, 

as well as its intensity 

and rate of buildup. 

96

Glass further from the 

fire will have heavier 

soot and smoke 

deposits than glass 

which is closer. 

97

Crazed or irregular 

pieces with light smoke 

deposits indicate a 

rapid buildup of heat. 

98

5) Floors seldom receive 

damage similar to that of 

ceilings, even in the case 

of total burnout, as the 

heat of the fire will be 

concentrated at the 

ceiling. 

99

In addition, as ceiling 

materials are damaged and 

fall, these materials protect 

the floor below. If, on the 

other hand, a large area of 

the floor is extensively 

damaged, the use of 

accelerants may be 

Indicated. 

100

8) In determining 

whether the fire was a 

slowly developing one 

or a rapidly developing 

one, the following 

indicators may be used: 

101

a) Alligatoring of wood - 

slow fires produce 

relatively flat alligatoring. 

Fast fires produce hump- 

backed, shiny 

alligatoring. 

102

) Spalling of concrete - 

indicates an intense, high 

heat fire. The spalling is 

caused by rapid boiling of 

the moisture trapped in 

the concrete. 

103

104

c) Fire patterns - a wide 

angle, or diffuse "V" pattern 

generally indicates a slowly- 

developing fire. A narrow 

sharply defined "V" pattern 

generally indicates a fast- 

developing, hot fire. 

105

NFPA 921 addressed many of the 

established indicators and debunked 

them in 1992 

4-5.5 Misconceptions about Char. 

4-6.1 Misconceptions about Spalling. 

4-17.1.1 Misconceptions about ―V‖ 

Patterns. 

4-17.2.1 Misconceptions about Inverted 

Cone Patterns. 

106



them in 1992 

4-8.1 Temperature Determination. 

Wood and gasoline burn at essentially 

the same flame temperature. The flame 

temperatures achieved by all 

hydrocarbon fuels (plastics and 

ignitible liquids) and cellulosic fuels are 

approximately the same, although the 

fuels release heat at different rates. 107



them in 1992 

4-10 Smoke and Soot. 

Because deposits of pyrolysis products 

tend to be widely distributed, they do not 

help locate the exact point of origin. 

108

―The investigation report stated: 

The examination of the hallway 

floor on the north end from the 

base of the north door and to the 

northwest door of the northeast 

bedroom disclosed a burn 

trailer, pour pattern, and puddle 

configuration.” 


109

NFPA 921 provides more 

warnings against this kind of 

―interpretation‖ than about any 

other fire artifact. This is 

because misidentifications of 

―trailers, pour patterns and 

puddle configurations‖ have 

been legion. Here are the 

warnings: 

110

4.17.7.2 Irregular Patterns. 

Irregular, curved, or ―pool-shaped‖ 

patterns on floors and floor coverings 

should not be identified as resulting 

from ignitable liquids on the basis of 

observation of the shape alone. In cases 

of full room involvement, patterns 

similar in appearance to ignitable liquid 

burn patterns can be produced when no 

ignitable liquid is present. 

111

The lines of demarcation between the 

damaged and undamaged areas of 

irregular patterns range from sharp 

edges to smooth gradations depending 

on the properties of the material and the 

intensity of heat exposure. Denser 

materials like oak flooring will 

generally show sharper lines of 

demarcation than thermoplastic (e.g., 

nylon) carpet. The absence of a carpet 

pad often leads to sharper lines. 

112

These patterns are common in situations of 

post flashover conditions, long extinguishing 

times, or building collapse. These patterns 

may result from the effects of hot gases, 

flaming and smoldering debris, melted 

plastics, or ignitable liquids. If the presence 

of ignitable liquids is suspected, supporting 

evidence such as the use of a combustible 

gas indicator, chemical analysis of debris for 

residues, or the presence of liquid containers 

should be sought. 

113

In any situation where the 

presence of ignitable liquids is 

suggested, the effects of 

flashover, airflow, hot gases, 

melted plastic, and building 

collapse should be considered. 

114

Even though some findings, 

based on ―flawed science‖ can 

be attributed to the wretched 

state of the art in 1991-92, other 

parts of Mr. Vasquez‘s testimony 

was far outside the bounds of 

what was accepted at that time. 

115

Flawed science, i.e., WRONG, 

but par for the course in 1991: 

116

Flawed science, i.e., WRONG, 

but par for the course in 1991: 

Crazed glass 

Low burns 

Irregular fire patterns on floors 

High temperatures 

117

Just plain WRONG, and far 

outside the bounds of acceptable 

practice, even in 1991: 

118

Just plain WRONG, and far 

outside the bounds of acceptable 

practice, even in 1991: 

Auto-ventilation 

800 o F fire temperature 

Multiple origins in fully involved 

rooms 

Discarding eyewitnesses 

119

Specifically, Mr. Vasquez‘s 

testimony that a wood fire 

burns at 800 o F has no basis 

in any literature or science. 

It is not written anywhere, 

because it is patently false. 

120

More importantly, his 

testimony about multiple 

origins is unsupportable, in 

conflict with the eyewitness 

observations of Diane Barbe, 

and his interpretation is 

specifically warned against in 

the texts of the day. 

121

1980 

122

6) Look for evidence of multiple fire 

origins. If the fires appear to be 

unrelated or discontinuous, the 

fires may have been deliberately 

set. However, multiple fires in a 

room, all originating from one fire 

are not uncommon. High-heat- 

producing fuels, such as plastics 

and interior finishes, can cause a 

degree of fire damage sufficient to 

mislead the investigator. 

123

Also, when ceiling temperatures 

reach 932 F to 1112 F (500 to 

600 C), flashover may occur when 

literally the entire contents of the 

room burst into flames 

simultaneously. The results of 

flashover may cause the 

investigator to conclude there were 

multiple fires when such was not 

the case. 

124

The questions to be answered on 

apparent multiple fires are: Were 

these fires the result of normal fire 

spread from fuel load to fuel load, 

either by flashover, burning 

materials being carried around the 

room by the effects of the fire, or 

other mechanisms? Or were the 

fires independent of each other 

and, therefore, of suspicious 

origin? 

125

1975 

126

Battle & Weston 1975 

―…separate fires were either observed 

burning in separate locations as 

observed by early arriving firefighters, 

or that they were clearly in separate 

remote areas‖ (pp. 8, 15l, 152 & 163). 

127

1977 

128

Bates, Elements of Fire and Arson 

Investigation, 1977 

―Multiple separate fires burning in 

different locations at the same time, 

without any possible way that the fires 

could have communicated from one 

place to another, is generally a good 

indication that the fire is of incendiary 

origin‖ (p. 76). 

129

1976 

130

Huron, Elements Of Arson, 1976 

―Separate and distinct fires with no 

connection on the walls of one room or 

in other parts of the premises are an 

indication that the fire is of incendiary 

origin‖ (p.37). 

131

1979 

132

―The presence of multiple 

origins is a strong indicator of 

an arson fire.‖ He warns, ―In 

order to verify multiple origins, 

carefully measure the char 

depths‖ (p. 132). 

133

1979 

134

―…..evidence of incendiary origin 

of a fire, as earlier indicated, the 

signs may include separate and 

distinct points of origin which, in 

turn, may be manifested in 

separate and distinct burn patterns 

either unconnected or originating 

in separate spaces‖ (p. 90). 

135

1987 

136

―If the investigator locates several distinct 

(unconnected) points of origin, each must 

be carefully examined. The crime scene 

photographs, sketches, and notes should 

clearly indicate that the multiple points of 

origin were not the result of normal fire 

travel, flashover, or burning material 

having been moved during suppression, 

overhaul, or salvage operations‖ (p. 87). 

137

1985 

138

―If there is more than one fire 

and they are separated, or not 

interrelated and were not 

caused by one another, this is 

acceptable evidence of 

incendiary origin.‖ 

139

1985 

140

―Because of the uneven way in which 

most fires burn, there may be more 

than one area of burning in a 

building which appears to be a seat of 

fire (point of origin). As one of the 

criteria for determining arson is more 

than one independent and 

contemporaneous seat of fire, it is 

very important that those elements 

can be proved.‖ 

141

Jailhouse Snitch Testimony: 

Q.: Did Todd Willingham tell you he 

poured lighter fluid on the children‘s 

floor of the children‘s room in an X 

pattern? 

A.: Yes, he did. 

--Testimony of Johnny Webb, p. 46 

142

Jailhouse Snitch Testimony 

(rephrased in closing argument): 

They want you to believe that this 

little two-year-old girl somehow out 

out of her room, over the child gate, 

rambled around through the house, 

found" lamp, went back over the 

child‘s gate, into the babies room, 

sprinkled it on the floor in this 

distinctive cross-type pattern, 

143

Prosecutor Jackson’s Cross Pattern 

144

Judge Jackson’s Pentagram 

145

Proof of Monstrosity! 

146

Scientific.Fire@yahoo.com 

www.firescientist.com 

151

John Lentini presentation at Court of Inquiry hearing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?