Using Carbon Dioxide as a Tracer Gas to Measure Air Change Rate ...
Using Carbon Dioxide as a Tracer Gas to Measure Air Change Rate ...
Using Carbon Dioxide as a Tracer Gas to Measure Air Change Rate ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Using</strong> <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Tracer</strong><br />
G<strong>as</strong> <strong>to</strong> Me<strong>as</strong>ure <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Rate</strong> in a<br />
Single Zone<br />
C. Simmons, F. Boelter, G. Crawford, Boelter & Yates,<br />
Inc., Park Ridge, IL<br />
Presented by:<br />
Catherine E. Simmons, CIH<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Situation<br />
Ventilation information w<strong>as</strong> needed <strong>to</strong><br />
perform a retrospective exposure<br />
<strong>as</strong>sessment.<br />
Procedure w<strong>as</strong> needed <strong>to</strong> determine the<br />
ventilation rate in air changes per hour<br />
(ACH) for representative boiler rooms and<br />
an isolation test chamber.<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Boiler Room Ventilation<br />
Research<br />
Published Information on Boiler Room <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Change</strong> <strong>Rate</strong>s<br />
ASHRAE, BOCA and NFPA reviewed for<br />
ventilation requirements in ACH<br />
Ventilation Models <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Tracer</strong> G<strong>as</strong><br />
Published Ventilation Models using <strong>Tracer</strong> G<strong>as</strong><br />
Standard Test Method for Determining <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Change</strong> in a Single Zone by Means of a <strong>Tracer</strong><br />
G<strong>as</strong> Dilution – ASTM E 741 – 00<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Problem<br />
Existing methods allow for the use of a variety of tracer<br />
g<strong>as</strong>es <strong>to</strong> be used.<br />
Each h<strong>as</strong> advantages and disadvantages.<br />
Selected method<br />
highly portable<br />
e<strong>as</strong>ily me<strong>as</strong>ured<br />
non-<strong>to</strong>xic or very low <strong>to</strong>xicity<br />
inexpensive<br />
<strong>Tracer</strong> g<strong>as</strong> acceptable <strong>to</strong> school district personnel.<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Research<br />
Standard Test Method for Determining <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong> in a<br />
Single Zone by Means of a <strong>Tracer</strong> G<strong>as</strong> Dilution – ASTM E<br />
741 – 00<br />
<strong>Tracer</strong> g<strong>as</strong>es (examples)<br />
CO 2 – PEL 5000 ppm<br />
SF 6 – PEL 1000 ppm<br />
CO – PEL 50 ppm<br />
Selection of test method<br />
Concentration Decay<br />
Constant Injection<br />
Constant Concentration<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Resolution<br />
Selection of tracer g<strong>as</strong><br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> dioxide<br />
Relatively high PEL<br />
Inexpensive<br />
E<strong>as</strong>y <strong>to</strong> obtain and me<strong>as</strong>ure<br />
Acceptable <strong>to</strong> School personnel<br />
Selection of method<br />
Concentration Decay Test Method<br />
Me<strong>as</strong>ures the decay rate of carbon dioxide over<br />
time <strong>to</strong> calculate the air exchange rate.<br />
Regression Analysis<br />
InC(t) = -At + C(0)<br />
<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Sample Time<br />
<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>Rate</strong> (1/hr)<br />
0.25<br />
0.5<br />
1<br />
2<br />
4<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
Minimum Duration (hour)<br />
4<br />
2<br />
1<br />
.5<br />
.25<br />
Minimum sample duration b<strong>as</strong>ed on 10% uncertainty at the 95%<br />
confidence level in the detection of air change rate, a tracer g<strong>as</strong><br />
concentration me<strong>as</strong>urement precision error of 5% of reading and<br />
various air change rate. <strong>Using</strong> the regression method reduces the<br />
minimum test duration due <strong>to</strong> more than 2 data points.
Boiler Room Ventilation<br />
Testing <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Tracer</strong> G<strong>as</strong><br />
Representative Boiler Rooms<br />
Elementary School - IN<br />
Elementary School - IL<br />
Middle School - IL<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
G<strong>as</strong> Injection and Distribution<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Direct Reading Equipment<br />
TSI Q-Trak<br />
Log Data<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
School<br />
Indiana<br />
• 5500 ft 3 Boiler Room<br />
• Volume of g<strong>as</strong> needed<br />
• Calculated b<strong>as</strong>ed on room<br />
size and target<br />
concentration of 4000 ppm<br />
V tracer = C target X V zone<br />
• 2 boilers<br />
– Input BTU/hr. - 117,000<br />
– Input BTU/hr. – 156,000<br />
• Both boilers operating<br />
during the testing<br />
• No mechanical ventilation<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong><br />
Concentration in Parts Per<br />
Million (PPM)<br />
4500<br />
4000<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Average CO2 Concentration vs Time<br />
Indiana Boiler Room - 2 Boilers Operating<br />
March 26, 2003<br />
1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73<br />
Time in Minutes<br />
Trial 1 – 5.2 ACH Trial 2 – 5.3 ACH<br />
Average 5.2 ACH<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
Trial 1 - Average<br />
CO2 Concentration<br />
(PPM) 5.2 <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour<br />
Trial 2 - Average<br />
CO2 Concentration<br />
(PPM) 5.3 <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour
Elementary School<br />
Illinois<br />
• Me<strong>as</strong>ured Volume –<br />
24,322 ft3 .<br />
• 2 Boilers<br />
• Ventilation tracer<br />
g<strong>as</strong> testing<br />
conducted with<br />
boilers on and off.<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
Ventilation <strong>Rate</strong> - Boilers Off<br />
1.8 <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour<br />
March 27, 2003<br />
0 18.75 37.5 56.25<br />
Time in Minutes<br />
Trial 1<br />
Boilers Off - 1.8 ACH<br />
Elementary School<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong><br />
Concentration<br />
(ppm)<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong><br />
Concentration<br />
(ppm)<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
Average CO2 Concentration vs Time<br />
March 27, 2003<br />
0<br />
2.25<br />
4.5<br />
6.75<br />
9<br />
11.3<br />
13.5<br />
15.8<br />
18<br />
20.3<br />
22.5<br />
24.8<br />
27<br />
29.3<br />
31.5<br />
Time in Minutes<br />
Boilers On<br />
Trial 2 – 3.5 ACH<br />
Trial 3 – 3.9 ACH<br />
Average 3.7 ACH<br />
Trial 2 - Average <strong>Carbon</strong><br />
<strong>Dioxide</strong> Concentrations<br />
with 2 Boilers Operating<br />
Trial 3 - Average <strong>Carbon</strong><br />
<strong>Dioxide</strong> Concentrations<br />
with 2 Boilers Operating
Middle School<br />
Illinois<br />
16,372 ft 3<br />
Boiler<br />
Room<br />
2 Identical<br />
Boilers<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
Average <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong> Concentration (ppm) vs<br />
Time<br />
Middle School<br />
March 21, 2003<br />
0 25 50<br />
Time in Minutes<br />
75<br />
Boilers Off<br />
1.2 ACH<br />
Middle School<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong><br />
Concentration (ppm)<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong><br />
Concentration (PPM)<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
Average CO2 Concentration vs Time<br />
Boiler Room - 2 Boilers<br />
March 31, 2003<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
1 112131415161718191<br />
Time in Minutes<br />
Boilers On<br />
Trial 2 - 4.4 ACH<br />
Trial 3 - 5.3 ACH<br />
Average – 4.9 ACH<br />
Boilers On (1 boiler on part<br />
time): Trial 2 - Average CO2<br />
Concentration 4.4 <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour,<br />
GlenCrest School March 31,<br />
2003<br />
Boilers On: Trial 3 - Average<br />
CO2 Concentration 5.3 <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour,<br />
GlenCrest School March 31,<br />
2003
Me<strong>as</strong>ured Range of Boiler Room<br />
Ventilation<br />
Summary<br />
Boilers Off<br />
Range: 1.2 <strong>to</strong> 1.8 ACH<br />
Boilers On<br />
Range: 3.7 <strong>to</strong> 4.9 ACH<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Isolation Test Chamber<br />
• Approximately 20’ x 20’ x 9’<br />
(3600 ft3 )<br />
• Wood Frame<br />
• Polyethylene sheeting on<br />
walls and floors<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
• 2 viewing windows<br />
• Entrance airlock<br />
• Decontamination Shower (if<br />
needed)<br />
• HEPA filtered exhaust<br />
machines for ventilation
HEPA Filtered Exhaust Machines<br />
for Chamber Ventilation System<br />
Note: <strong>Using</strong> various configurations, both machines operated<br />
<strong>as</strong> exhaust (tubing w<strong>as</strong> attached <strong>to</strong> machines <strong>to</strong> exhaust<br />
outside the building).<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Installation and Me<strong>as</strong>urement of<br />
Ventilation System<br />
Various configurations <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />
approximately 1, 3, 5 and 10 ACH<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> dioxide tracer g<strong>as</strong> used <strong>to</strong><br />
me<strong>as</strong>ure ventilation rate.<br />
Each rate tested twice <strong>to</strong> <strong>as</strong>sure<br />
repeatability.<br />
Final ventilation rates were: 1.2, 2.9, 5.7,<br />
10.7 ACH.<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong><br />
Concentration (ppm)<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong> Concentration (ppm) vs Time<br />
B & Y Test Chamber<br />
5.7 <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour<br />
April 29, 2003<br />
0<br />
16:28<br />
16:30<br />
16:32<br />
16:34<br />
16:36<br />
16:38<br />
16:40<br />
Time<br />
Trial 1 – 5.8 ACH Trial 2 – 5.8 ACH<br />
Trial 1 – 5.8 ACH Trial 2 – 5.5 ACH<br />
16:42<br />
16:44<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
Average 5.7<br />
16:46<br />
16:48<br />
16:50<br />
Trial 1 - high<br />
Trial 1 - low<br />
Trial 2 - high<br />
Trial 2 - low
Conclusions<br />
Ventilation rates for representative boiler<br />
rooms were between 1 and 5 ACH.<br />
<strong>Using</strong> carbon dioxide <strong>as</strong> a tracer g<strong>as</strong> and<br />
following ASTM E 741 – 00, Standard Test<br />
Method for Determining <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong> in a<br />
Single Zone by Means of a <strong>Tracer</strong> G<strong>as</strong><br />
Dilution met the objectives and goals of the<br />
project.<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
Benefits<br />
<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong> <strong>as</strong> a tracer g<strong>as</strong><br />
Inexpensive, reliable procedure for IH’s <strong>to</strong> determine<br />
ventilation rates.<br />
Me<strong>as</strong>uring Equipment is readily available<br />
The method provides an additional <strong>to</strong>ol for<br />
industrial hygienists <strong>to</strong> better characterize<br />
workplace conditions during the initial stages of<br />
an exposure <strong>as</strong>sessment.<br />
Ventilation information is critical <strong>to</strong> the ability <strong>to</strong><br />
perform and validate mathematical modeling for<br />
exposure estimation.<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004
C(t)<br />
Well Mixed Room Model - Constant<br />
Contaminant Emission <strong>Rate</strong><br />
G + C ⋅ Q ⎡ ⎛ Q + k ⋅ V ⎞⎤<br />
⎛ Q + k ⋅ V ⎞<br />
IN ⎢ ⎜<br />
L ⎟⎥<br />
+ ⎜<br />
L<br />
= 1−<br />
exp − t C exp − t ⎟<br />
Q + k ⋅ V ⎢ ⎜<br />
⎟⎥<br />
⎜<br />
⎟<br />
⎣ ⎝<br />
V<br />
0<br />
⎠⎦<br />
⎝<br />
V<br />
L<br />
⎠<br />
Input Variables<br />
C IN<br />
V m 3<br />
K L<br />
C 0<br />
mg/m 3<br />
G mg/min<br />
Q m 3/min<br />
per min<br />
mg/m 3<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
Concentration in incoming air<br />
Generation <strong>Rate</strong><br />
Exhaust air flow<br />
Volume of Room<br />
Loss Pathway (sinks)<br />
Initial concentration
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0<br />
3<br />
6<br />
9<br />
Predicted Concentration at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 3, 4, 5 and 10<br />
<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Change</strong>s Per Hour<br />
12<br />
Effect of Ventilation <strong>Rate</strong> on<br />
Concentration of Contaminant<br />
15<br />
18<br />
21<br />
24<br />
27<br />
30<br />
33<br />
36<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004<br />
39<br />
42<br />
45<br />
0.01<br />
ACH<br />
0.1<br />
ACH<br />
1 ACH<br />
3 ACH<br />
4 ACH<br />
5 ACH<br />
10<br />
ACH
Thank you!<br />
Questions?<br />
Speaker Contact Information:<br />
Catherine E. Simmons, CIH<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc.<br />
Park Ridge, IL<br />
csimmons@boelter-yates.com<br />
Boelter & Yates, Inc. 2004