Action Plan Peach Fruit Fly Bactrocera zonata - Nuclear Sciences ...

Dacus (Leptoxyda) phloginus (Munro)
Dacus (Leptoxyda) purpurifrons Bezzi
Dacus (Leptoxyda) pusillator (Munro)
Dacus (Leptoxyda) retextus Munro
Dacus (Leptoxyda) rubicundus Bezzi
Dacus (Leptoxyda) rufoscutellatus (Hering)
Dacus (Leptoxyda) rufus Bezzi
Dacus (Leptoxyda) ruslan (Hering)
Dacus (Leptoxyda) scaber Loew
Dacus (Leptoxyda) seguyi (Munro)
Dacus (Leptoxyda) semisphaerus Becker
Dacus (Leptoxyda) sicatoluteus (Munro)
Dacus (Leptoxyda) temnopterus Bezzi
Dacus (Leptoxyda) triater Munro
Dacus (Leptoxyda) woodi Bezzi
Dacus (Leptoxyda) xanthopus Bezzi
Dacus (Leptoxyda) zavattarii (Hering)
Dacus (Metidacus) adenae (Hering)
Dacus (Metidacus) amberiens (Munro)
ATTRACTION TO LURES UNKNOWN (continued - 4 of 4)
47
Dacus (Metidacus) bidens (Curran)
Dacus (Metidacus) delicatus Munro
Dacus (Metidacus) herensis (Munro)
Dacus (Metidacus) lotus (Bezzi)
Dacus (Metidacus) partus (Munro)
Dacus (Metidacus) pergulariae Munro
Dacus (Metidacus) phimis (Munro)
Dacus (Metidacus) purus (Curran)
Dacus (Metidacus) radmirus Hering
Dacus (Metidacus) rutilus Munro
Dacus (Metidacus) stylifer (Bezzi)
Ichneumonopsis burmensis Hardy
Monacrostichus citricola Bezzi
Monacrostichus malaysiae Drew & Hancock
1 Cunningham 1989 and Drew 1974 both cite that
B. ochrosiae (Malloch) is attracted to cuelure, but
Drew (personal communication) expresses his doubts
that the earlier citations are accurate.
Note: Although the literature may indicated that a given species is attracted to one or several known lures or
attractants, quite often there is no indication to what degree that species may be attracted. It should not be
assumed that all species listed above respond in the same fashion to the lure. In fact, it would be safer to assume
that the response can be quite varied in relation to the actual population that exists. Lure or attractants can be
extremely powerful in attracting certain species. Those species that are not attracted to any known lure would be
candidates for area-wide control using the SIT.
Sources:
Cunningham, R. T. 1989. Parapheromones. In A. Robinson and G. H. S. Hooper. [Eds.] 1989. Fruit Flies: Their
Biology, Natural Enemies and Control - World Crop Pests, Volume 3A. pp. 221-230. Elsevier, The Netherlands,
pp. 372.
Drew, R. A. I. 1974. The responses of fruit fly species in the South Pacific area to male attractants. J. Aust.
Entomol. Soc., 13:267-270.
Drew, R. A. I. 1989. The tropical fruit flies of the Australasian and Oceanian regions. Mem. Queensland Mus.
No. 26.
Drew, R. A. I.; Hancock, D. L.; Romig, M. C. 1999. New species and records of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae:
Dacinae) from north Queensland. Australian Entomologist 26 (1): 1-12.
Drew, R. A. I.; Hooper, G. H. S. 1981.The responses of fruit fly species in Australia to various attractants. J.
Aust. Entomol. Soc., 20:201-205.
Hancock, D. L. 1985. New species and records of African Dacinae. Arnoldia Zimb. 9:299-314.
Lux, S.; White, I. M. ICIPE Fruit Fly Initiative (http://nbo.icipe.com)
White, I. M.; Elson-Harris, M. M. 1992. Fruit Flies of Economic Significance: Their Identification and
Bionomics. CABI International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 601
White, I. M.; Hancock, D. L. 1997. The Bactrocera And Dacus Species Of The Indo-Australasian Regions (CD-
ROM). CAB International, Wallingford, UK.