05.04.2013 Views

Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances in ...

Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances in ...

Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It should be noted that average visibility rat<strong>in</strong>gs of “1” at shorter distances are almost all<br />

observations made when the w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es were shaded, a circumstance that reduces visual<br />

contrast between the turb<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> their visual backdrop, or, for the Seven Mile facility, when<br />

views of the facility were partially obstructed.<br />

Summary of Observations with <strong>Visibility</strong> Rat<strong>in</strong>g of “2”<br />

Maximum observed distance: 54.7 km (34.0 mi)<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum observed distance: 15.6 km (9.7 mi)<br />

Recommended threshold distance: 48 km (30 mi)<br />

As noted above, a visibility rat<strong>in</strong>g of “2” describes facilities that would likely be missed by<br />

casual observers but would be visible when scann<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>and</strong>scape or look<strong>in</strong>g closely at an area,<br />

without extended view<strong>in</strong>g. In this study, the maximum distance at which facilities received an<br />

average visibility rat<strong>in</strong>g of “2” was 54.7 km (34.0 mi), with another observation at 48.3 km (30.0<br />

mi) receiv<strong>in</strong>g an average rat<strong>in</strong>g of 2.13. There are five observations with average visibility<br />

rat<strong>in</strong>gs of “2” at distances of approximately 45 km (28 mi), <strong>and</strong> two additional observations with<br />

one rat<strong>in</strong>g of “2” between 45 <strong>and</strong> 47 km (28 <strong>and</strong> 29 mi), a strong argument that the threshold<br />

should not be set lower than that distance. On the assumption that the longest distance views<br />

might be regarded as exceptional, a more conservative distance for the threshold would be 48<br />

km (30 mi).<br />

Summary of Observations with <strong>Visibility</strong> Rat<strong>in</strong>g of “3”<br />

Maximum observed distance: 36.9 km (22.9 mi)<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum observed distance: 12.4 km (7.7 mi)<br />

Recommended threshold distance: 32 km (20 mi)<br />

As noted above, a visibility rat<strong>in</strong>g of “3” describes facilities that would be visible after a brief<br />

glance, <strong>and</strong> unlikely to be missed by a casual observer.” At this level of visibility, impacts may<br />

rise to a moderate level, depend<strong>in</strong>g on circumstances <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape context. In this study, the<br />

maximum distance at which facilities received an average visibility rat<strong>in</strong>g of “3” was 36.9 km<br />

(22.9 mi), with several observations receiv<strong>in</strong>g rat<strong>in</strong>gs of “3” by some observers up to distances<br />

of 50.4 km (31.3 mi). There are four observations with average rat<strong>in</strong>gs of “3” at distances<br />

exceed<strong>in</strong>g 32 km (20 mi), <strong>and</strong> an additional three observations with average rat<strong>in</strong>gs of 2.88<br />

beyond 32 km (20 mi). Observations for Seven Mile extended to just under 32 km (20 mi), <strong>and</strong><br />

are slightly lower than those for the Cedar Creek facility, possibly because of the mixed<br />

sky/ground backdrop, or possibly because of partially obstructed views. Factor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Seven<br />

Mile observations, a very conservative distance estimate for the threshold would be 32 km (20<br />

mi).<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!