06.04.2013 Views

Towards the Healthy City - Global Built Environment Review

Towards the Healthy City - Global Built Environment Review

Towards the Healthy City - Global Built Environment Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Whittingham, N GBER Vol .8 Issue. 2 pp 61 - 87<br />

Conclusion<br />

This article has been an exploration of <strong>the</strong> issues surrounding health and sustainable<br />

development. Health impacts are increasingly being seen as a perspective that should<br />

be taken in all aspects of life. Developing country cities have huge challenges ahead<br />

to secure water supply and adequate sanitation and <strong>the</strong> provision of adequate housing<br />

in safe locations (Kjellstrom and Mercado, 2008). However, as Marmot et al (2010)<br />

have shown, health inequalities on a large scale can also exist in a supposedly,<br />

developed country. The Marmot review outlines six key policy objectives to act as a<br />

framework for assessing performance in enhancing health and overcoming health<br />

inequalities. These are presented in Table 9.<br />

Table 9. Framework of policy objectives for assessing performance in<br />

enhancing health and overcoming health inequalities<br />

(Source: Marmot et al, 2010)<br />

A – Give every child <strong>the</strong> best start in life<br />

B - Enable all children, young people and adults to maximise <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

capabilities and have control in <strong>the</strong>ir lives<br />

C – Create fair employment and good work for all<br />

D- Ensure healthy standard of living for all<br />

E - Create and develop healthy and sustainable places and communities<br />

F - Streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> role and impact of ill health prevention<br />

With <strong>the</strong> appropriate political will, inequalities in access to different resources could<br />

be tackled and health inequalities overcome. However, such inequalities are due to a<br />

variety of determinants and overcoming <strong>the</strong>m requires approaches on a number of<br />

fronts. Coupled with this, <strong>the</strong> threats of climate change have led to increased political<br />

pressure for economies to be tailored to address such challenges, whilst also<br />

promoting health and wellbeing. Shiva (2009) argues for <strong>the</strong> need to avoid climate<br />

chaos through a threefold paradigm shift: from a reductionist to a holistic worldview<br />

based on interconnections; from a mechanistic, industrial paradigm to an ecological<br />

one; and from a consumerist definition of being human to one that recognises us as<br />

conservers of <strong>the</strong> earth’s finite resources and cocreators of wealth with nature. With<br />

such a perspective, it is considered that participatory measures taken to respond to<br />

<strong>the</strong> twin threats of climate change and peak oil could also represent an opportunity to<br />

enhance <strong>the</strong> health and wellbeing of <strong>the</strong> poor and vulnerable and reduce health<br />

inequalities in <strong>the</strong> shorter and longer terms. Upon reflection, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Healthy</strong> Cities<br />

project represents an opportunity to find such common solutions to difficult<br />

syndemic problems, especially if a focus is shifted, in a new form of praxis, from <strong>the</strong><br />

study of vulnerabilty to <strong>the</strong> study of healthy resilience and how people adapt and<br />

thrive (Dooris, 2009; Harpham, 2009). There are however many difficulties to<br />

overcome for effective implementation of health promotion initiatives. A holistic,<br />

participatory perspective, if fur<strong>the</strong>r translated to healthy cities research could help to<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r transcend <strong>the</strong> dominance of <strong>the</strong> academic, scientific research paradigm,<br />

provide a greater degree of accountability for <strong>the</strong> researchers and more effectively<br />

link action, research and evaluation (Smithies and Adams,1993). It is considered that<br />

with fur<strong>the</strong>r multi-sectoral amendments to practice, fur<strong>the</strong>r research over holistic<br />

approaches to health and its determinants, and fur<strong>the</strong>r developments in community<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!