minneapolis recycling evaluation november, 29, 2011 - City of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

QUESTIONS (AND ANSWERS) • If Minneapolis switched from the current multi‐sort system to dual or single sort, what could the city expect in the areas <strong>of</strong>: 1. Recycling Rate? ‐ Increase 2. Residual Rate? ‐ Increase 3. Net Revenue? ‐ No significant decrease 4. Operations? ‐ More efficient
INFORMATION USED FOR THIS STUDY • Minneapolis – Current program and dual/single sort pilot programs • St. Paul – Converted from source separated to dual sort in 2001. • Ann Arbor – Converted from multi sort to dual sort in 1995, converted to single sort in 2009 • Portland – Converted from multi sort to dual sort in 1999 • Other Cities including Cincinnati, Kansas <strong>City</strong>, Toledo
Page 1: MINNEAPOLIS RECYCLING EVALUATION NO
Page 5 and 6: 20% 19% 18% 17% 16% 15% 14% 13% 12%
Page 7 and 8: WHY ARE SOME HIGHER THAN OTHERS?
Page 9 and 10: COMMINGLING INCREASES CONVENIENCE
Page 11 and 12: SINGLE AND DUAL SORT • Significan
Page 13 and 14: MARKET TRENDS • No evidence of de
Page 15 and 16: MARKET TRENDS (DATA) Very Fast Reco
Page 17 and 18: Collection Cost per Ton Revenue per
Page 19 and 20: POTENTIAL PROGRAM COST CHANGES Curr
Page 21 and 22: STUDY ‐ CONCLUSIONS • Peer citi
Page 23 and 24: WHAT CAN MINNEAPOLIS EXPECT • A n

minneapolis recycling evaluation november, 29, 2011 - City of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?