minneapolis recycling evaluation november, 29, 2011 - City of ...

ePAPER READ

DOWNLOAD ePAPER

minneapolismn.gov

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

START NOW

WHY ARE SOME HIGHER THAN

OTHERS?

• Cincinnati

– Biweekly cart program just recently rolled out,

likely to rise

– No significant limits on trash setout

• Kansas City

– Opt‐in recycling program

– Bin only

– PAYT program but no

strong recycling push

twin cities green product and service directory - City of Minneapolis

BLUEPRINT FOR ACTION - City of Minneapolis

Community Kitchen Facilities - City of Minneapolis

National Crime Information Center (NCIC) - City of Minneapolis

WHY ARE SOME HIGHER THAN OTHERS? • Cincinnati – Biweekly cart program just recently rolled out, likely to rise – No significant limits on trash setout • Kansas City – Opt‐in recycling program – Bin only – PAYT program but no strong recycling push

COMMINGLING INCREASES CONVENIENCE • Survey results from a biweekly single sort cart pilot

Page 1 and 2: MINNEAPOLIS RECYCLING EVALUATION NO
Page 3 and 4: INFORMATION USED FOR THIS STUDY •
Page 5 and 6: 20% 19% 18% 17% 16% 15% 14% 13% 12%
Page 7: WHY ARE SOME HIGHER THAN OTHERS?
Page 11 and 12: SINGLE AND DUAL SORT • Significan
Page 13 and 14: MARKET TRENDS • No evidence of de
Page 15 and 16: MARKET TRENDS (DATA) Very Fast Reco
Page 17 and 18: Collection Cost per Ton Revenue per
Page 19 and 20: POTENTIAL PROGRAM COST CHANGES Curr
Page 21 and 22: STUDY ‐ CONCLUSIONS • Peer citi
Page 23 and 24: WHAT CAN MINNEAPOLIS EXPECT • A n

minneapolis recycling evaluation november, 29, 2011 - City of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?