minneapolis recycling evaluation november, 29, 2011 - City of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STUDY ‐ CONCLUSIONS Current Recovery Same as St Paul Recovery Same as Portland Tons Collected 18,580 25,097 34,454 Net Revenue per Ton $ 115 $ 60 $60 Net Payment to City $ 2,136,700 $ 1,505,811 $ 2,067,218 Avoided Tip Fees ($45/ton) $ ‐ $ 306,292 $ 439,769 Net Revenue $ 2,136,700 $ 1,812,104 $ 2,506,987 Collection Savings ?? ??
STUDY ‐ CONCLUSIONS • Peer cities programs have moved away from source separation • Material diversion is almost double in peer communities with dual or single‐sort • Markets for materials accept residue as cost of doing business • Single sort programs can produce high material quality with good education program
Page 1 and 2: MINNEAPOLIS RECYCLING EVALUATION NO
Page 3 and 4: INFORMATION USED FOR THIS STUDY •
Page 5 and 6: 20% 19% 18% 17% 16% 15% 14% 13% 12%
Page 7 and 8: WHY ARE SOME HIGHER THAN OTHERS?
Page 9 and 10: COMMINGLING INCREASES CONVENIENCE
Page 11 and 12: SINGLE AND DUAL SORT • Significan
Page 13 and 14: MARKET TRENDS • No evidence of de
Page 15 and 16: MARKET TRENDS (DATA) Very Fast Reco
Page 17 and 18: Collection Cost per Ton Revenue per
Page 19: POTENTIAL PROGRAM COST CHANGES Curr
Page 23 and 24: WHAT CAN MINNEAPOLIS EXPECT • A n

minneapolis recycling evaluation november, 29, 2011 - City of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?