Assessment of Strategic Policy Options (685 KB PDF - Angus Council
Assessment of Strategic Policy Options (685 KB PDF - Angus Council
Assessment of Strategic Policy Options (685 KB PDF - Angus Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Angus</strong> Shoreline Management Plan<br />
Part B2.4:<br />
CPU 4: Rickle Craig to Ethie Haven
f—222y——2ƒ2—2<br />
222g22rwƒy2g2@A<br />
F2…—222<br />
g22—2—2—2222<br />
2F2e2g2veHHWHPQvF2PHHRF<br />
uXE<br />
g˜2u<br />
w…2f—<br />
v——2f—<br />
exq…ƒ2ƒry‚ivsxi<br />
wexeqiwix„2€vex<br />
‚2g—<br />
w…2R2G2I<br />
i2r—<br />
wexeqiwix„2…xs„2ve‰y…„<br />
x<br />
H HFS I<br />
u<br />
psq…‚i2f2PFV<br />
w…2QGI
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
Management Unit 4 / 1 Lunan Bay<br />
From: Rickle Craig NO (6977 5260)<br />
To: EthieHaven NO (6981 4878)<br />
Approximate Length : 4.7km<br />
Coastal Overview<br />
Lunan Bay is a sandy bay backed by hinterland dunes and a fossil cliff line and contained between<br />
high cliffs at either end <strong>of</strong> the Management Unit. Hence sediment interchange to either the north or<br />
the south <strong>of</strong> the unit is minimal with there being little loss or gain <strong>of</strong> sediment from the unit. The<br />
shoreline in recent history has shown little change and the beach unit is relatively stable with the<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> periodic storm damage to the frontal dune system mainly in the southern half <strong>of</strong> the bay.<br />
Pedestrian access pressures and other human activities over the dunes from the Car Park just to the<br />
north <strong>of</strong> the outlet <strong>of</strong> Lunan Water have resulted in destabilisation <strong>of</strong> the dune system with blowouts<br />
and other wind erosion features evident.<br />
Natural & Heritage Environment<br />
Statutory<br />
• Northern 1km <strong>of</strong> Whiting Ness to Ethie Haven SSSI covering the<br />
Designated sites<br />
intertidal rock platform at EthieHaven to mouth <strong>of</strong> Keilor Burn<br />
Non Statutory<br />
Designated sites<br />
• No non statutory designated sites<br />
Heritage sites and listed • Boddin Point Lime Kilns, Boddin Harbour, Black Jack, Red Castle,<br />
buildings<br />
Newbarns and Corbie Knowe<br />
Human & Built Environment<br />
Land Use • Mainly Grade 3 agriculture land<br />
• Some residential property & B&B behind the dunes at Lunan<br />
• Holiday cottages/ chalets at Corbie Knowe<br />
Sea use • Fishing and Recreational use<br />
Infrastructure • Minor access road and car park at Lunan<br />
Recreation & tourism • Bathing & recreational beach, horse riding<br />
Land Ownership / Occupation Interests<br />
Land • Dunninald Estate<br />
• Redcastle Farm & Newbarns Farm<br />
• Private Housing & Chalets<br />
Foreshore / seabed • Crown Estates to MHWS mark<br />
• Redcastle Salmon Fisheries Ltd<br />
Coastal Defences<br />
• Usan Boat Services<br />
Type • Various privately constructed concrete / masonry walls, gabions and<br />
dumped builders rubble at Corbie Knowe<br />
Future Development<br />
• Beach and dune system along majority <strong>of</strong> frontage<br />
Relevant Statutory • Dundee and <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan (2002)<br />
Development Plans • <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan (2000)<br />
Relevant Non-statutory • Local Agenda 21<br />
plans<br />
• Tayside Local Biodiversity Action Plan<br />
• The Keilor Trust Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Association<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-42
Consultation Issues<br />
The following issues were raised during consultation:<br />
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
Issue Individual/ Organisation<br />
Coastal Processes • Ongoing loss <strong>of</strong> beach at southern end <strong>of</strong><br />
Lunan Bay<br />
• Ethie Haven Residents<br />
Natural Environment • Erosion to dunes due to unmanaged access • The Keilor Trust<br />
Human & Built<br />
• Visual Impact <strong>of</strong> electricity poles<br />
• The Keilor Trust<br />
Environment<br />
• Programme <strong>of</strong> continual upgrading <strong>of</strong> • Ethiehaven Residents<br />
recreation facilities<br />
• The Keilor Trust<br />
Coastal Defence • Provision <strong>of</strong> coastal defences to protect • Ethiehaven Residents<br />
Future development<br />
holiday homes at Corbie Knowe<br />
• The Keilor Trust<br />
Issues not directly relevant to coastal defence are shown in italic.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Assets at Risk<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> tangible and intangible assets being lost within the Management Unit is<br />
based on:<br />
• Long-term erosion <strong>of</strong> the frontal dunes and potential dune breach north <strong>of</strong> the mouth <strong>of</strong> the Lunan<br />
Water.<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> coastal defences at the southern end <strong>of</strong> the bay.<br />
Risk to tangible assets Risk Risk to intangible assets Risk<br />
Property loss<br />
Infrastructure loss<br />
Land loss<br />
Property flooding<br />
Land flooding<br />
Transport disruption<br />
Recreational loss<br />
Low<br />
-<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
-<br />
Low<br />
Environmental losses<br />
Heritage losses<br />
Recreation & tourism<br />
Social effects<br />
Future coastal changes will be dominated by episodic storm events leading to a long-term, but slow<br />
retreat <strong>of</strong> the dune edge. It is unlikely that this rate <strong>of</strong> retreat will result in erosion <strong>of</strong> farmland backing<br />
the dunes along the southern half <strong>of</strong> the bay or result in loss <strong>of</strong> property or historic interest at the<br />
mouth <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water. Under a severe easterly storm, there is a risk <strong>of</strong> breaching <strong>of</strong> the dune<br />
ridge to the north <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water outlet. This could lead to flooding <strong>of</strong> land, including the car<br />
park, and a flood risk to property in the immediate hinterland. Despite Corbie Knowe being relatively<br />
sheltered, the coastal defences are unlikely to prevent damage to frontal property and the immediate<br />
hinterland under a severe storm from the north-east.<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-43<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
-
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> Appraisal<br />
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
Of the five generic policy options available for consideration two have been discounted, primarily<br />
because:<br />
• There are no plans for development requiring land reclamation, which would require an advance<br />
the line policy.<br />
• Given the health <strong>of</strong> the natural defences there is little requirement or scope for a managed<br />
realignment policy.<br />
Hence, the remaining generic policy options for this Management Unit have been further assessed<br />
against the SMP objectives and consultation issues identified:<br />
• No active intervention.<br />
• Limited intervention – Repair existing defences at Corbie Knowe when required and carry out<br />
dune management activities.<br />
• Hold the line - Maintenance and upgrading <strong>of</strong> existing coastal defences at Corbie Knowe to<br />
maintain or increase standard <strong>of</strong> defence.<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-44
General<br />
Objectives<br />
Specific Objectives<br />
OBJECTIVE<br />
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
POLICY<br />
Technically feasible a a a - -<br />
Environmentally acceptable a a a IP - -<br />
Economically viable a a a IP - -<br />
Sustainable a a a IP - -<br />
Compatible with adjacent Management Units<br />
Addresses consultation issues<br />
a<br />
X<br />
a a - -<br />
L a S Planning & the Built Environment<br />
a - -<br />
• Identify coastal flooding and erosion risk and its impact on coastal land use and future a a a - -<br />
development plans.<br />
Natural Environment<br />
• Ensure SMP policy allows natural coastal processes to continue with minimal<br />
disruption.<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-45<br />
No active<br />
intervention<br />
Limited<br />
intervention<br />
Hold the line<br />
Managed realignment<br />
Advance the<br />
line<br />
a a a I - -<br />
• Ensure that SMP policy maintains and where possible enhances natural environment<br />
and biodiversity. a a a IP - -<br />
• Ensure that SMP policy is sympathetic and aims to enhance the aesthetic and<br />
landscape quality <strong>of</strong> the coastline. a a a IP - -<br />
Archaeology & Cultural Heritage<br />
• Ensure SMP policy does not adversely impact on areas <strong>of</strong> archaeological and cultural<br />
importance.<br />
a S a a - -<br />
• Ensure SMP policy will attempt to conserve and maintain diversity <strong>of</strong> archaeological<br />
interest and wreck sites for future generations. a S a a - -<br />
Recreation & Tourism<br />
• Ensure SMP policy does not reduce the recreation and tourism value <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> a a a IP - -<br />
coast.<br />
• Where possible SMP policy aims to incorporate and improve recreation and tourism<br />
management.<br />
= a a IP - -<br />
• Where possible improve visitor management in environmentally sensitive areas. = a a IP - -<br />
Ports, Harbours, Industry and MoD<br />
• Ensure that Shoreline Management Plan policy does not create additional adverse<br />
impacts on Ports, Harbours, Industry and Ministry <strong>of</strong> Defence land.<br />
- - - - -<br />
• Promote the use <strong>of</strong> suitable dredged material to support natural coastal defences. - - - - -<br />
Agriculture & Fisheries<br />
• Ensure that Shoreline Management Plan policy does not create additional adverse<br />
impacts on agricultural land and fishing activity.<br />
a a a - -<br />
SUITABILITY OF STRATEGY OPTION a S a a P - -<br />
Legend<br />
a <strong>Policy</strong> (generally) compatible with objective I <strong>Policy</strong> compatible / conflicts depending on<br />
implementation method<br />
X <strong>Policy</strong> (potentially) conflicts with objective P <strong>Policy</strong> compatible / conflicts over part <strong>of</strong> unit<br />
= Neither contributes or conflicts with objective S <strong>Policy</strong> compatible / conflicts over Short Term<br />
- <strong>Policy</strong> not technically viable / Objective not relevant L <strong>Policy</strong> compatible / conflicts over Long Term
<strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Options</strong><br />
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
The policy options deemed technically feasible in the strategic policy appraisal have been further<br />
assessed for their effects/implications on the six key areas identified in the impact summary matrix:<br />
Impact Summary Matrix for technically feasible coastal defence policy options<br />
Technically Feasible <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Options</strong><br />
Effects/ No active intervention Limited intervention Hold the line<br />
Implications On Repair <strong>of</strong> existing defences Selectively maintaining and<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> dunes upgrading existing defences<br />
when required.<br />
at Corbie Knowe.<br />
1) Allow natural coastal<br />
1) Maintain the natural<br />
process to continue<br />
coastal process to allow Natural coastal process will resulting in long term retreat<br />
Coastal Processes<br />
them to continue to provide<br />
the coastal defence function<br />
continue resulting in long<br />
term but slow retreat <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>of</strong> the dune line<br />
2) Defence <strong>of</strong> private<br />
2) Potential for dune breach dune line<br />
cottages will have minimal<br />
north <strong>of</strong> Lunan Water<br />
1) Enable private owners at<br />
impact on dune and coast to<br />
the immediate north<br />
Coastal Defence<br />
May result in a reduction in<br />
standard <strong>of</strong> defence<br />
provided by dunes north <strong>of</strong><br />
Lunan water and eventual<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> defences at southern<br />
end <strong>of</strong> bay<br />
Corbie Knowe to repair<br />
existing defences but may<br />
result in long term reduction<br />
in the standard <strong>of</strong> defence<br />
2) Management and repair<br />
<strong>of</strong> dunes to reduce<br />
pedestrian and storm<br />
damage<br />
Permit the standard <strong>of</strong><br />
defence to be maintained<br />
and upgraded at Corbie<br />
Knowe<br />
Natural<br />
Environment<br />
No significant issues No significant issues<br />
1) Holiday cottages at<br />
No significant issues<br />
Human & Built<br />
Environment<br />
Increased risk to holiday<br />
cottages at Corbie Knowe,<br />
private property and car<br />
park behind the dunes north<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lunan Water<br />
Corbie Knowe protected<br />
2) Long term standard <strong>of</strong><br />
natural defences maintained<br />
protecting car park and<br />
property behind Lunan<br />
water<br />
Enable private owners to<br />
maintain and upgrade level<br />
<strong>of</strong> protection to property at<br />
Corbie Knowe<br />
Economically viable Yes Yes Yes<br />
Impacts on adjacent<br />
Management Units<br />
No anticipated impacts No anticipated impacts No anticipated impacts<br />
Suitability <strong>of</strong><br />
strategic option<br />
Yes in the short term Yes Yes (Part Of)<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-46
SMP Preferred <strong>Policy</strong> Option<br />
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
Potential time frame Preferred <strong>Policy</strong> Option<br />
Present policy (2004)<br />
Limited intervention / No active<br />
intervention<br />
Selectively hold the line:<br />
Short term policy < 10 - 15 years • Limited intervention<br />
• Hold the line<br />
Selectively hold the line:<br />
Long term policy > 10 - 15 years • Limited intervention<br />
• Hold the line<br />
Along the main frontage to the north <strong>of</strong> Corbie Knowe, a no active intervention policy is<br />
recommended in both the short and long term over most <strong>of</strong> the frontage. This will allow the natural<br />
beach/ dune system to continue to provide the coastal defence function. However, it should be<br />
appreciated that the dune line is likely to retreat over the timeframe <strong>of</strong> the SMP. Hence some<br />
intervention will be required to maintain the standard <strong>of</strong> protection provided by the dunes to the<br />
property and recreational facilities to the north <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water outlet. Hence to the north <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lunan Water a limited intervention policy is recommended. This would require maintaining the<br />
dynamic beach dune system to provide an adequate and consistent defence standard to attempt to<br />
maintain a sufficient width <strong>of</strong> dune to prevent breaching to the north <strong>of</strong> the outlet <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water.<br />
A limited intervention policy would also maintain the natural and aesthetic qualities <strong>of</strong> the beach<br />
along with its amenity interest.<br />
At Corbie Knowe, a limited intervention policy would allow the owners to repair and maintain their<br />
existing defences. However, it is recommended that a hold the line policy should be implemented to<br />
allow the owners to continue to maintain the standard <strong>of</strong> protection to their holiday homes in response<br />
to any increased risk, such as potential threats due to an increase in storminess and sea level rise.<br />
These policies are based on the assumption that there is no further development seaward <strong>of</strong> the fossil<br />
cliff line related to the 8m raised beach.<br />
Areas <strong>of</strong> Potential Conflict<br />
• No commitment from <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (Coast Protection Authority) to provide coast protection to<br />
private property either by upgrading or replacing the coastal protection at Corbie Knowe or any<br />
other privately owned frontage within this Management Unit.<br />
• Environmentally or aesthetically unacceptable coastal protection being used at Ethie Haven and<br />
Corbie Knowe (e.g. builders rubble).<br />
• Recreational access reducing the standard <strong>of</strong> defence provided by the dunes to the north <strong>of</strong> the<br />
outlet <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water.<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-47
Additional Management Requirements<br />
Shoreline Management Plan<br />
It is recommended that a beach monitoring programme be initiated to monitor any changes in the<br />
beach / dune system to inform when a change in policy may be required. It is suggested that beach /<br />
dune pr<strong>of</strong>iles be set up at:<br />
• Corbie Knowe<br />
• 2 further pr<strong>of</strong>iles south <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water<br />
• 2 pr<strong>of</strong>iles north <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water<br />
It is likely that further action will be required to reduce access pressures on the dunes to the north <strong>of</strong><br />
the Lunan Water.<br />
Management activities to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> pedestrian pressures and natural wind erosion<br />
processes on the dunes, particularly to the north <strong>of</strong> the Lunan Water, will be an essential component in<br />
maintaining the natural standard <strong>of</strong> defences provided by dune system.<br />
Volume 1, Part B2 First Edition 1-B2-48