07.04.2013 Views

Jacques Ellul- Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology?*

Jacques Ellul- Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology?*

Jacques Ellul- Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology?*

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222 THE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEWER<br />

definitions allows f<strong>or</strong> careful assessment as to whether the "accompanying<br />

characteristics" always are present, and why. This simple<br />

definitional c<strong>or</strong>rection neutralizes not only the prefigured<br />

sociological claims about man in technological society, it also leads<br />

toward ways <strong>of</strong> testing them. Most imp<strong>or</strong>tant, it frees our the<strong>or</strong>y<br />

from the pervasive fatalism that suggests that modern man is<br />

submerged by a technological determinism unless and until (a) we<br />

kill each other <strong>of</strong>f in war, (b) God decides to intervene, <strong>or</strong> (c) we are<br />

transf<strong>or</strong>med by a spiritual revolt (perhaps stimulated by <strong>Ellul</strong>'s<br />

theological w<strong>or</strong>ks?). 21 We can check <strong>Ellul</strong>'s gloom only if we introduce<br />

the possibility-the classical possibility-<strong>of</strong> humanly controlling<br />

technology through politics. On the other hand, <strong>Ellul</strong>'s<br />

w<strong>or</strong>ks are imp<strong>or</strong>tant because they rivet attention on problems that<br />

must be studied, albeit by m<strong>or</strong>e rig<strong>or</strong>ous methods, in research on the<br />

relations between technology and society.<br />

The Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Technological Society:<br />

<strong>Technology</strong>, Man, Freedom, and Politics<br />

The characteristic <strong>of</strong> the technological society that troubles <strong>Ellul</strong><br />

the most as he reviews his w<strong>or</strong>k in sociology and theology seems to be<br />

the logic <strong>of</strong> the w<strong>or</strong>ld that systematizes and <strong>or</strong>ders the social existence;<br />

<strong>Ellul</strong> argues that he himself is in self-contradiction on the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>or</strong>der:<br />

Here again I am in complete contradiction with myself. By preference I am a<br />

man <strong>of</strong> <strong>or</strong>der. I like everything to unfold without a hitch, f<strong>or</strong> my day's schedule<br />

to be precisely planned. I am unhappy in dis<strong>or</strong>der. . . . But I cannot tolerate external<br />

and f<strong>or</strong>mal <strong>or</strong>der.... <strong>or</strong>der is b<strong>or</strong>n from dis<strong>or</strong>der, and imbalances alone<br />

are creative. Freedom, too, is never established once and f<strong>or</strong> all; it has to be<br />

reconquered, lost, and gambled f<strong>or</strong> again. So I would not say that I am a man<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>or</strong>der but rather a man who believes in the necessity <strong>of</strong> a constantly renewed<br />

action (222).<br />

21. Technological Society, xxx. The literature that is imp<strong>or</strong>tant in coming to grips<br />

with <strong>Ellul</strong>'s purposes can best be expl<strong>or</strong>ed in The Meaning <strong>of</strong> the City, trans. Dennis<br />

Pardee (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1970); The<br />

Politics <strong>of</strong> God and the Politics <strong>of</strong> Man, trans. Ge<strong>of</strong>frey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids,<br />

Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1972); and The Ethics <strong>of</strong> Freedom,<br />

trans. Ge<strong>of</strong>frey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdman's Publishing<br />

Co., 1976).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!