Jacques Ellul- Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology?*
Jacques Ellul- Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology?*
Jacques Ellul- Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology?*
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
222 THE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEWER<br />
definitions allows f<strong>or</strong> careful assessment as to whether the "accompanying<br />
characteristics" always are present, and why. This simple<br />
definitional c<strong>or</strong>rection neutralizes not only the prefigured<br />
sociological claims about man in technological society, it also leads<br />
toward ways <strong>of</strong> testing them. Most imp<strong>or</strong>tant, it frees our the<strong>or</strong>y<br />
from the pervasive fatalism that suggests that modern man is<br />
submerged by a technological determinism unless and until (a) we<br />
kill each other <strong>of</strong>f in war, (b) God decides to intervene, <strong>or</strong> (c) we are<br />
transf<strong>or</strong>med by a spiritual revolt (perhaps stimulated by <strong>Ellul</strong>'s<br />
theological w<strong>or</strong>ks?). 21 We can check <strong>Ellul</strong>'s gloom only if we introduce<br />
the possibility-the classical possibility-<strong>of</strong> humanly controlling<br />
technology through politics. On the other hand, <strong>Ellul</strong>'s<br />
w<strong>or</strong>ks are imp<strong>or</strong>tant because they rivet attention on problems that<br />
must be studied, albeit by m<strong>or</strong>e rig<strong>or</strong>ous methods, in research on the<br />
relations between technology and society.<br />
The Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Technological Society:<br />
<strong>Technology</strong>, Man, Freedom, and Politics<br />
The characteristic <strong>of</strong> the technological society that troubles <strong>Ellul</strong><br />
the most as he reviews his w<strong>or</strong>k in sociology and theology seems to be<br />
the logic <strong>of</strong> the w<strong>or</strong>ld that systematizes and <strong>or</strong>ders the social existence;<br />
<strong>Ellul</strong> argues that he himself is in self-contradiction on the<br />
problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>or</strong>der:<br />
Here again I am in complete contradiction with myself. By preference I am a<br />
man <strong>of</strong> <strong>or</strong>der. I like everything to unfold without a hitch, f<strong>or</strong> my day's schedule<br />
to be precisely planned. I am unhappy in dis<strong>or</strong>der. . . . But I cannot tolerate external<br />
and f<strong>or</strong>mal <strong>or</strong>der.... <strong>or</strong>der is b<strong>or</strong>n from dis<strong>or</strong>der, and imbalances alone<br />
are creative. Freedom, too, is never established once and f<strong>or</strong> all; it has to be<br />
reconquered, lost, and gambled f<strong>or</strong> again. So I would not say that I am a man<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>or</strong>der but rather a man who believes in the necessity <strong>of</strong> a constantly renewed<br />
action (222).<br />
21. Technological Society, xxx. The literature that is imp<strong>or</strong>tant in coming to grips<br />
with <strong>Ellul</strong>'s purposes can best be expl<strong>or</strong>ed in The Meaning <strong>of</strong> the City, trans. Dennis<br />
Pardee (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1970); The<br />
Politics <strong>of</strong> God and the Politics <strong>of</strong> Man, trans. Ge<strong>of</strong>frey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids,<br />
Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1972); and The Ethics <strong>of</strong> Freedom,<br />
trans. Ge<strong>of</strong>frey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdman's Publishing<br />
Co., 1976).