07.04.2013 Views

2011 Hertford College Magazine (Issue 91)

2011 Hertford College Magazine (Issue 91)

2011 Hertford College Magazine (Issue 91)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusor. You had a vacuum<br />

chamber, which you pumped down<br />

to around 10-6 torr. Then you injected the<br />

gases you want to fuse, keeping the pressure<br />

below 10-4 torr. Inside the vessel were<br />

two electrodes, which were concentric<br />

wire spheres. You put about 20,000 volts<br />

across them, with the inner electrode negatively<br />

charged, and the electric field would<br />

accelerate the positively charged gas particles<br />

towards the centre. Some would collide<br />

with the inner electrode, but many<br />

would pass into the centre, where they<br />

would collide with each other, and hopefully<br />

fuse. You would have your own personal<br />

star in a bottle on a desk. You needed<br />

little more than a small vacuum vessel,<br />

a pump, a power supply, and some carefully<br />

crafted wire basket weaving, unlike<br />

the multinational collaborations that built<br />

JET in Culham and ITER in Cadarache.<br />

But then, they were all trying to achieve<br />

something that I had no intention of attempting.<br />

They were trying to get energy<br />

out of their fusion reactors, a goal that has<br />

been publicized as being twenty years in<br />

the future ever since the 1970s. As a clean,<br />

safe and relatively cheap energy source,<br />

nuclear fusion has been the Holy Grail of<br />

energy production since it was first proposed.<br />

And like the Holy Grail, after years<br />

of searching, it is still far beyond our grasp.<br />

“ You would have your own<br />

personal star in a bottle on<br />

a desk ”<br />

This design would break long before<br />

you got close to getting energy out it, but<br />

that didn’t mean it wasn’t useful. Whilst<br />

getting energy out of it was nigh on impossible,<br />

getting neutrons out of it looked relatively<br />

straightforward, and could be produced<br />

from dozens of possible reactions.<br />

You can use neutrons for all kinds of<br />

HERTFORD COLLEGE MAGAZINE<br />

<strong>Hertford</strong> past and present: My own personal star<br />

Phil’s reactor<br />

useful things. For instance, you can inject<br />

cancer patients with boron-11, which<br />

is absorbed by tumours, and then blast<br />

them with small doses of neutrons. The<br />

low doses do little damage to the patient,<br />

but are absorbed by the boron, which<br />

breaks down and emits alpha particles,<br />

killing the tumour. Or, you can fire them<br />

at samples. You can look at how the neutrons<br />

are scattered to see the structure of<br />

the sample, a process known as diffraction<br />

analysis, or look at the gamma rays emitted<br />

to see what’s in it, known as neutron<br />

activation analysis. You could even fire it<br />

at airport luggage and look for 10.8 MeV<br />

gamma rays. These are indicative of nitrogen,<br />

which you tend to get only in explosives<br />

and fertilizer, and you shouldn’t<br />

have either of those on a plane. Neutrons<br />

are surprising difficult to get hold of, given<br />

that they are one of the most common<br />

21.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!