Density and species diversity of trees in four - Makerere University
Density and species diversity of trees in four - Makerere University
Density and species diversity of trees in four - Makerere University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
G. Eilu et al.<br />
Family<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Genera<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Species Family<br />
gradient (Ter Braak & Smilauer, 1998). The first <strong>four</strong> axes <strong>of</strong><br />
CCA <strong>and</strong> DCA, respectively, expla<strong>in</strong>ed 16.2 <strong>and</strong> 19.1% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cumulative variance <strong>in</strong> <strong>species</strong> data (Table 4). The third <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>four</strong>th axes with eigenvalues < 0.250 were less important <strong>in</strong> ecological<br />
terms <strong>and</strong> are not considered further. The sample scores<br />
on the first CCA axis were most strongly correlated with pH <strong>and</strong><br />
those <strong>of</strong> the second axis with altitude. Correlations between<br />
environmental variables <strong>and</strong> DCA ord<strong>in</strong>ation axes confirmed<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Genera<br />
Euphorbiaceae 16 25 Ochnaceae 2 2<br />
Rubiaceae 12 16 Olacaceae 2 2<br />
Meliaceae 8 16 Verbenaceae 2 2<br />
Fabaceae 12 13 Icac<strong>in</strong>aceae 1 2<br />
Sapotaceae 6 11 Agavaceae 1 1<br />
Sap<strong>in</strong>daceae 7 8 Alangiaceae 1 1<br />
Apocynaceae 5 8 Aquifoliaceae 1 1<br />
Moraceae 5 8 Araliaceae 1 1<br />
Ulmaceae 4 8 Arecaceae 1 1<br />
Flacourtiaceae 6 7 Asteraceae 1 1<br />
Sterculiaceae 5 7 Balanitaceae 1 1<br />
Annonaceae 4 6 Canellaceae 1 1<br />
Unknown 1 5 Chrysobalanaceae 1 1<br />
Anacardiaceae 4 4 Cyatheaceae 1 1<br />
Clusiaceae 4 4 Dichapetalaceae 1 1<br />
Simarubaceae 4 4 Ebenaceae 1 1<br />
Rutaceae 3 4 Hypericaceae 1 1<br />
Tiliaceae 3 4 Loganiaceae 1 1<br />
Rhizophoraceae 1 4 Melastomataceae 1 1<br />
Bignoniaceae 3 3 Melianthaceae 1 1<br />
Capparidaceae 3 3 Monimiaceae 1 1<br />
Oleaceae 3 3 Myristicaceae 1 1<br />
Rhamnaceae 3 3 Myrtaceae 1 1<br />
Borag<strong>in</strong>aceae 2 2 Rosaceae 1 1<br />
Cecropiaceae 2 2 Theaceae 1 1<br />
Celastraceae 2 2 Violaceae 1 1<br />
Lauraceae 2 2 — — —<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Species<br />
Table 3 Tree families, numbers <strong>of</strong> genera <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>species</strong> recorded from Bw<strong>in</strong>di, Kasyoha, Kibale<br />
<strong>and</strong> Budongo forests <strong>of</strong> the Albert<strong>in</strong>e Rift<br />
Table 4 Eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> the first <strong>four</strong> axes <strong>of</strong> canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) <strong>and</strong> Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) <strong>of</strong> all<br />
plots <strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> variance expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>of</strong> the <strong>species</strong> data <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>species</strong>-environment relation by the CCA axes. The length <strong>of</strong> gradient<br />
is shown for DCA<br />
Axes 1 2 3 4 Total <strong>in</strong>ertia<br />
Eigenvalues (CCA) 0.480 0.259 0.228 0.128 6.757<br />
(DCA) 0.709 0.251 0.207 0.149 6.879<br />
Lengths <strong>of</strong> gradient (DCA) 5.259 2.772 2.700 2.191 —<br />
Species-environment correlations (CCA) 0.861 0.820 0.950 0.755 —<br />
Cumulative percentage variance <strong>of</strong> <strong>species</strong> data (CCA) 7.1 10.9 14.3 16.2 —<br />
(DCA) 10.3 14.0 17.0 19.1 —<br />
Cumulative percentage variance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>species</strong>-environment<br />
relation (CCA)<br />
30.1 46.4 60.7 68.7 —<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong> all unconstra<strong>in</strong>ed eigenvalues (CCA) — — — — 6.757<br />
(DCA) — — — — 6.757<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong> all canonical eigenvalues (CCA) — — — — 1.593<br />
results <strong>of</strong> CCA analysis with axis 1 most strongly correlated with<br />
pH (r = 0.565).<br />
Automatic forward selection <strong>of</strong> environmental variables by<br />
canoco (Table 6) showed that pH expla<strong>in</strong>ed the most variance<br />
(0.39) while silt expla<strong>in</strong>ed the least (0.08%). After select<strong>in</strong>g pH,<br />
altitude, ra<strong>in</strong>fall, loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter on Ignition, potassium<br />
(K), available phosphorus <strong>and</strong> slope contributed significantly (at<br />
5% level) to the model <strong>of</strong> already <strong>in</strong>cluded variables.<br />
306 Diversity <strong>and</strong> Distributions, 10, 303–312, © 2004 Blackwell Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd