09.04.2013 Views

Outstanding Paper - Emerald

Outstanding Paper - Emerald

Outstanding Paper - Emerald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Benchmarking<br />

An International Journal<br />

<strong>Outstanding</strong> <strong>Paper</strong><br />

Integration of supply chain IT and lean<br />

practices for mass customization:<br />

benchmarking of product and service focused<br />

manufacturers<br />

Paul C. Hong<br />

Department of Information, Operations, and Technology<br />

Management, College of Business, University of Toledo,<br />

Toledo, Ohio, USA<br />

David D. Dobrzykowski<br />

Department of Computer Information Systems,<br />

College of Business, Eastern Michigan University,<br />

Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA<br />

Mark A. Vonderembse<br />

Department of Information, Operations, and Technology<br />

Management, College of Business, University of Toledo,<br />

Toledo, Ohio, USA<br />

Abstract<br />

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the use of<br />

specific supply chain information technologies (IT) for e-commerce,<br />

e-procurement, and enterprise resource planning (ERP), when<br />

implementing lean practices to achieve mass customization (MC)<br />

performance. The study further investigates how these technologies<br />

may be deployed differently in product and service focused<br />

contexts. ‘‘Best practices’’ of high performing MC firms are also<br />

explored.<br />

Design/methodology/approach – Survey method was employed<br />

to collect data from 711 firms in 23 countries. Exploratory factor<br />

analysis was employed to establish simple factor structure and<br />

construct validity. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to<br />

analyze relationships between lean practices, IT use, and MC<br />

performance in aggregated and bifurcated samples of product and<br />

service focused manufacturers. T-tests were used to examine<br />

differences between the practices employed by high and low MC<br />

performers.<br />

Findings – Findings suggest that lean practices can reasonably<br />

predict MC performance. In this context, of lean practices,<br />

e-commerce and e-procurement reasonably predict MC<br />

performance. ERP is not shown to predict MC performance. Results<br />

suggest that e-commerce use is a better predictor of performance<br />

than e-procurement or ERP for service focused manufacturers.<br />

E-commerce and e-procurement appear to be reasonable<br />

predictors of MC performance in product manufacturers, while ERP<br />

is not. ‘‘Best practices’’ related to lean practices, e-commerce,<br />

e-procurement, and ERP emerge among high MC performers.<br />

Originality/value – This paper describes what is believed to be the<br />

first study to examine these three IT approaches in the context of<br />

lean practices and supply chain MC performance. This paper also<br />

contributes to the growing interest in differences among product and<br />

service focused manufacturing firms. Finally, specific ‘‘best<br />

practices’’ are provided to add value for practitioners.<br />

Keywords Best practice, Communication technologies,<br />

Electronic commerce, Lean production, Quality improvement,<br />

Supply chain management<br />

www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/14635771011060594<br />

BIJ<br />

Volume 17 Number 4, 2010, pp. 561-92<br />

Editor: Angappa Gunasekaran<br />

9<br />

British Food Journal<br />

<strong>Outstanding</strong> <strong>Paper</strong><br />

A tale of two crises: the Belgian and Irish dioxin<br />

contamination incidents<br />

Donal K. Casey<br />

James S. Lawless<br />

School of Law, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland<br />

Patrick G. Wall<br />

School of Public Health and Population Sciences,<br />

University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland<br />

Abstract<br />

Purpose – This paper aims to provide a focused overview of two<br />

dioxin incidents, with particular emphasis on regulatory successes<br />

and failures and their respective causes. The paper seeks to adopt<br />

a comparative approach to the case studies, with considerable use<br />

made of primary sources such as parliamentary debate,<br />

government reports and EC legislation.<br />

Design/methodology/approach – The paper is a review of the<br />

strengths and weaknesses in the management of the Belgian and<br />

Irish dioxin contanimation incidents.<br />

Findings – It is concluded that open, transparent and decisive risk<br />

management, based on robust risk assessment, is paramount in<br />

ensuring confidence in both the food supply chain and, in the feed<br />

and food safety regulatory process. It is also concluded that the<br />

2008 Irish dioxin incident tested the reforms prompted by previous<br />

food scares.<br />

Practical implications – It is important that the lessons from these<br />

two incidents are learnt if they are not to be repeated in other<br />

jurisdictions.<br />

Originality/value – This is the first academic study of the 2008 Irish<br />

dioxin incident, one of the most significant recent food scares in the<br />

European Communities. The incident emphasises the vital role of<br />

open, transparent and decisive decision making in managing risk. In<br />

addition, through a comparative analysis of the Belgian and Irish<br />

incidents, the utility of the reforms prompted by previous food scares<br />

is demonstrated. In particular, the study highlights the important role<br />

played by the European Food Safety Authority in one of its first<br />

major tests as a risk assessor and risk communicator.<br />

Keywords Belgium, Contamination, European Union, Food safety,<br />

Ireland, Risk management<br />

www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00070701011080212<br />

BFJ<br />

Volume 112 Number 10, 2010, pp. 1077-91<br />

Editor: Christopher J. Griffith

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!