09.04.2013 Views

Bulletin 25 2010 - BSES

Bulletin 25 2010 - BSES

Bulletin 25 2010 - BSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12<br />

QCrOps / peTer sAMsON, keiTh ChANDLer, NADer sALLAM<br />

We demonstrated at Tully that zero-<br />

or zonal-tillage planting preserves<br />

Metarhizium spores in the cane row – the<br />

best position to come into contact with<br />

future generations of canegrubs. In an<br />

old ratoon where Metarhizium had been<br />

infecting greyback canegrubs, most spores<br />

were under stools in the row, with fewer<br />

on the side of the row and very few in the<br />

interspace – see figure 1.<br />

With zero tillage and a double-disc<br />

opener planter or with zonal tillage (rotary<br />

+ ripper/grubber + rotary in 76 cm band)<br />

and a conventional planter, planting back<br />

into the old rows, the Metarhizium spores<br />

in the new cane crop remained in the best<br />

position to contact future generations of<br />

canegrubs. figure 2 shows results for the<br />

zonal-tillage option.<br />

iNseCTiCiDes<br />

We tested two questions about canegrub<br />

control with insecticide applied when<br />

using double-disc opener planters or in<br />

dual rows, relative to their registrations<br />

for conventional planters and single rows.<br />

The questions were:<br />

Spores/g OD soil (x 10 3 )<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

OlD RATOON<br />

0 mm <strong>25</strong>0 mm 500 mm 750 mm<br />

Lateral position<br />

• Should application rates be increased<br />

for dual rows? (There are about 11,100<br />

metres of crop-row per hectare for<br />

dual rows with 1.8 m between beds,<br />

compared with 6,700 row metres for<br />

single rows at 1.5 m spacing.)<br />

• Are the narrow row-bands of<br />

insecticide from double-disc opener<br />

planters as effective as wider bands<br />

that are obtained when using<br />

conventional planters?<br />

fIGuRE 1 | Numbers of Metarhizium spores in an old ratoon crop,<br />

from the centre of the row (0 mm) to the centre of the interspace (750<br />

mm); note that most spores were in the row – where canegrubs live.<br />

[‘New farming systems’<br />

should encompass not only<br />

sustainable agronomic practices but<br />

also sustainable pest management<br />

with more precisely targeted<br />

pesticide application than has been<br />

the rule.]<br />

Effective application rates of insecticides<br />

suSCon Blue, suSCon Maxi and Confidor<br />

Guard in dual rows were within the range<br />

currently on the registered labels: the<br />

high end of current label rates per 100 m<br />

of single row was effective when applied<br />

as the same amount per 100 m of dual-<br />

row bed.<br />

Both suSCon Blue and suSCon Maxi gave<br />

satisfactory control of greyback canegrub<br />

when applied in narrow bands between<br />

the discs of a double-disc opener planter<br />

– comparable to control in conventional<br />

furrow-width bands.<br />

Spores/g OD soil (x 10 3 )<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Control of greyback and Childers<br />

canegrubs with suSCon Maxi was also<br />

satisfactory when applied at fill-in of<br />

conventional planting furrows in a dualrow<br />

configuration.<br />

Confidor Guard (liquid imidacloprid) gave<br />

at least 1-year control of greyback and<br />

Childers canegrubs in dual rows when<br />

applied either at planting or at fill-in.<br />

Confidor Guard was effective when applied<br />

using coulters in dual-row ratoons (for<br />

greyback and southern 1-year canegrubs)<br />

and in dual-row plant cane (for greyback<br />

canegrub). When applying Confidor Guard<br />

in dual rows against greyback canegrub,<br />

twin coulters were slightly more effective<br />

than a single coulter.<br />

use patterns in new farming systems<br />

differ from label recommendations in<br />

conventional systems. Despite the fact<br />

that application rates are comparable,<br />

recommendations to industry cannot be<br />

made until the Australian Pesticides and<br />

Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA)<br />

approves the changes.<br />

ZONAl TIllAGE,<br />

CONVENTIONAl PlANTER<br />

Row Shoulder Interrow<br />

0-150 mm 150-300 mm<br />

fIGuRE 2 | Numbers of Metarhizium spores with a zonaltillage<br />

system at two depths; spore distribution in the new crop<br />

(1st ratoon) was similar to the old crop cycle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!