09.04.2013 Views

Bulletin 25 2010 - BSES

Bulletin 25 2010 - BSES

Bulletin 25 2010 - BSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4<br />

QCrOps / BArry sALTer<br />

TABlE 2 | Cane (TCH) and sugar yield (TSH) of varieties Q151, Q190 A , Q208 A and Q232 A grown on 1.5 m single, 1.8 m single and<br />

1.8 m dual rows near Bundaberg.<br />

Bundaberg<br />

crop<br />

Yield<br />

AVERAGES fOllOWED BY THE SAME lETTER ARE NOT SIGNIfICANTlY DIffERENT<br />

At Mackay (Table 3) crops on the<br />

1.8 m single row configuration yielded<br />

significantly less than those on the 1.5 m<br />

single and 1.8 m dual row configurations.<br />

There were variety differences, with<br />

Q190 A performing poorly at the site<br />

but no variety-by-row configuration<br />

interaction. All varieties performed poorly<br />

on the 1.8 m single row spacing.<br />

In the Burdekin (Table 4) no difference<br />

was found between the 1.85 m single<br />

and 1.85 m dual row configurations.<br />

Row configuration<br />

Plant TCH 1.5 m single<br />

1.8 m single<br />

1.8 m dual<br />

Average<br />

TSH<br />

1.5 m single<br />

1.8 m single<br />

1.8 m dual<br />

Average<br />

1st Ratoon TCH 1.5 m single<br />

1.8 m single<br />

1.8 m dual<br />

Average<br />

Q151 A<br />

Although large difference in yield were<br />

found between varieties these differences<br />

were not statistically significant, due to<br />

large variation within the trial. The<br />

variety-by-row configuration interaction<br />

was not significant.<br />

All varieties produced similar yield on<br />

the 1.85 m single and 1.85 m dual row<br />

configurations. There was no evidence that<br />

the growth patterns exhibited by Q117<br />

and Tellus A were an advantage on the<br />

dual row configuration.<br />

At Ingham, there was no significant<br />

difference between row configurations<br />

(Table 5). A variety effect was found<br />

due to the poor performance of Q183 A .<br />

The variety-by-row configuration effect<br />

was not statistically significant. All<br />

varieties responded to the different row<br />

configurations in a similar manner.<br />

TABlE 3 | Cane (TCH) and sugar (TSH) yield of varieties Q190 A , Q200 A , Q208 A and Q209 A grown on 1.5 m single, 1.8 m<br />

single and 1.8 m dual rows near Mackay.<br />

Mackay<br />

crop<br />

TSH<br />

Yield<br />

1.5 m single<br />

1.8 m single<br />

1.8 m dual<br />

Average<br />

Row configuration<br />

Plant TCH 1.5 m single<br />

1.8 m single<br />

1.8 m dual<br />

Average<br />

TSH<br />

1.5 m single<br />

1.8 m single<br />

1.8 m dual<br />

Average<br />

134.1<br />

134.2<br />

132.5<br />

133.6 ab<br />

18.4<br />

19.1<br />

18.8<br />

18.8 ab<br />

124.9<br />

108.9<br />

95.7<br />

109.8 a<br />

AVERAGES fOllOWED BY THE SAME lETTER ARE NOT SIGNIfICANTlY DIffERENT<br />

Q190 A<br />

124.7<br />

120.6<br />

134.0<br />

126.4 a<br />

Q208A Variety<br />

138.1<br />

134.8<br />

149.9<br />

140.9 ab<br />

Q232 A<br />

144.2<br />

145.6<br />

153.4<br />

147.7 b<br />

[At the time trials were planted, sugarcane smut was<br />

found in Queensland, therefore smut-resistant varieties were<br />

selected where possible.]<br />

21.1<br />

18.6<br />

15.9<br />

18.5 a<br />

Q190 A<br />

93.4<br />

83.6<br />

95.2<br />

90.7 a<br />

15.4<br />

13.9<br />

16.1<br />

15.1 a<br />

17.3<br />

16.7<br />

18.3<br />

17.5 a<br />

116.8<br />

108.8<br />

112.7<br />

112.8 ab<br />

19.5<br />

17.9<br />

18.8<br />

18.7 a<br />

Q200 A<br />

124.6<br />

104.9<br />

1<strong>25</strong>.6<br />

118.4 c<br />

21.9<br />

18.1<br />

21.9<br />

20.6 b<br />

18.6<br />

19.1<br />

21.1<br />

19.6 bc<br />

145.3<br />

140.5<br />

139.5<br />

141.8 c<br />

<strong>25</strong>.3<br />

24.7<br />

23.6<br />

24.5 b<br />

Q208A Variety<br />

120.1<br />

96.4<br />

127.1<br />

114.6 bc<br />

20.9<br />

16.6<br />

22.6<br />

19.8 b<br />

20.0<br />

21.6<br />

23.0<br />

21.6 c<br />

120.5<br />

127.2<br />

126.0<br />

124.6 b<br />

19.8<br />

21.4<br />

20.5<br />

20.6 a<br />

Q209 A<br />

113.3<br />

98.0<br />

106.1<br />

105.8 b<br />

20.6<br />

17.9<br />

19.3<br />

19.3 b<br />

Average<br />

135.3 a<br />

133.8 a<br />

142.4 a<br />

18.6 a<br />

19.1 a<br />

20.3 a<br />

126.9 a<br />

121.4 a<br />

118.5 a<br />

21.4 a<br />

20.6 a<br />

19.7 a<br />

Average<br />

112.8 b<br />

95.7 a<br />

113.5 b<br />

19.7 b<br />

16.6 a<br />

19.8 b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!