PDF(886K) - Wiley Online Library

means to knowledge exploration]. Information – Wissenschaft und Praxis,
61(1), 5–18.
Gödert, W. (2010b). Semantische Wissensrepräsentation und Interoperabilität.
Teil 2: Ein formales Modell semantischer Interoperabilität [Semantic
knowledge representation and interoperability. Part 2: A formal model of
semantic interoperability]. Information – Wissenschaft und Praxis, 61(1),
19–28.
Gust von Loh., S., Stock, M., & Stock, W.G. (2009, November). Knowledge
organization systems and bibliographical records in the state of flux.
Hermeneutical foundations of organizational information culture. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology (ASIS& T 2009), Vancouver, Canada.
Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interest. Cambridge, United
Kingdom: Polity Press. (First published 1968).
Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society. Does democracy
still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory
on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. San Francisco: Harper. (First
published 1927).
Hjørland, B. (2007). Semantics and knowledge organization.Annual Review
of Information Science and Technology, 41, 367–406.
Hjørland, B. (2009). Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1519–1536.
Hjørland, B. (2010a). Concepts. Classes and colligation. Bulletin of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(3), 2–3.
Hjørland, B. (2010b).Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory). Journal
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5),
1078–1080.
Hjørland, B. (2010c, February). Concepts, paradigms and knowledge organization.
Paper presented at the International Society for Knowledge Organization
Conference: Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge
Organization. Rome, Italy.
Horrocks, I., & Sattler, U. (1999). A description logic with transitive and
inverse roles and role hierarchies. Journal of Logic and Computation,
9(3), 385–410.
Hovy, E. (2002). Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies.
In R. Green, C.A. Bean, & S.H. Myaeng (Eds.). The semantics of
relationships (pp. 91–110). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Jarrett, K. (2008). Interactivity is evil! A critical investigation of Web 2.0.
First Monday, 13(3).
Johansson, I. (2004). On the transitivity of the parthood relations. In H.
Hochberg & K. Mulligan (Eds.), Relations and predicates (pp. 161–181).
Frankfurt, Germany: Ontos.
Khoo, C.S.G., & Na, J.C. (2006). Semantic relations in information
science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40,
157–228.
Klaus, G. (1973). Moderne Logik [Modern logics], 7th Ed. Berlin, Germany:
Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Knautz, K., Soubusta, S., & Stock, W.G. (2010, January). Tag clusters
as information retrieval interfaces. Paper presented at the 43th Annual
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43), Kauai,
HI. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from http://www.computer.org/portal/
web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2010.360
Komatsu, L.K. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure. Psychological
Bulletin, 112(3), 500–526.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Löbner, S. (2002). Understanding semantics. London: Arnold.
Löbner, S. (2003). Semantik. Eine Einführung [Semantics.An introduction].
Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Menne,A. (1980). Einführung in die Methodologie [Introduction to methodology].
Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Mervis, C.B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual
Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In
P.H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morris, J. (2010). Individual differences in the interpretation of text. Implications
for information science. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 141–149.
Nardy, D., & Brachman, R.J. (2003). An introduction to description logics.
In F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, & P. Patel-
Schneider (Eds.), The description logic handbook. Theory, implementation
and applications (pp. 1–40). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University
Press.
National Information Standards Organization. (2005). Guidelines for the
Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled
Vocabularies (ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005). Baltimore: Author.
Noy, N.F., Fergerson, R.W., & Musen, M.A. (2000). The knowledge model of
Protégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. Lecture Notes
in Computer Science, 1937, 69–82.
Noy, N.F., Sintek, M., Decker, S., Crubezy, M., Fergerson, R.W., & Musen,
M.A. (2001). Creating Semantic Web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE
Intelligent Systems, 16(2), 60–71.
Ogden, C.K., & Richards, I.A. (1985). The meaning of meaning. London:
ARK Paperbacks. (First published 1923).
Pawłowski, T. (1980). Begriffsbildung und Definition [Concept formation
and definition]. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Peters, I. (2009). Folksonomies: Indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0. Berlin,
Germany: De Gruyter Saur.
Peters, I., & Stock, W.G. (2007). Folksonomies and information retrieval. In
Proceedings of the 70th ASIS&T Annual Meeting (CD-ROM) (pp. 1510–
1542). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Peters, I., & Stock, W.G. (2008). Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation
und Information Retrieval [Folksonomies in knowledge representation
and information retrieval]. Information – Wissenschaft und Praxis, 59(2),
77–90.
Peters, I., & Weller, K. (2008a). Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in
knowledge organization systems. Information – Wissenschaft und Praxis,
59(2), 100–107.
Peters, I., & Weller, K. (2008b). Tag gardening for folksonomy enrichment
and maintenance. Webology, 5(3), article 58.
Petersen, W. (2007). Representation of concepts as frames. The Baltic
International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 2,
151–170.
Pribbenow, S. (2002). Meronymic relationships: From classical mereology
to complex part-whole relations. In R. Green, C.A. Bean, & S.H.
Myaeng (Eds.), The semantics of relationships (pp. 35–50). Dordrecht,
the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Priss, U. (2006). Formal concept analysis in information science. Annual
Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 521–543.
Reimer, U. (1991). Einführung in die Wissensrepräsentation [Introduction
to knowledge representation]. Stuttgart, Germany: Teubner.
Rosch, E. (1975a). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal
of Experimental Psychology—General, 104(3), 192–233.
Rosch, E. (1975b). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4),
532–547.
Rosch, E. (1983). Prototype classification and logical classification: The two
systems. In E.K. Scholnick (Ed.), New trends in conceptual representation.
Challenges to Piaget’s theory? (pp. 73–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies
in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4),
573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3),
382–439.
Saussure, F. de (2005). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-
Hill. (First published 1916).
Schmidt, S.J. (1969). Bedeutung und Begriff [Meaning and concept].
Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.
Schmidt, S., & Stock, W.G. (2009). Collective indexing of emotions
in images. A study in emotional information retrieval. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5),
863–876.
1968 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY—October 2010
DOI: 10.1002/asi