10.04.2013 Views

SPSS Categories® 11.0

SPSS Categories® 11.0

SPSS Categories® 11.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Chapter 1<br />

Homogeneity Analysis<br />

analyze, or you can analyze all of them. Alternatively, the Homogeneity Analysis procedure<br />

can be used to examine all of the variables simultaneously without the need to<br />

construct interaction variables.<br />

Relation to standard techniques. The <strong>SPSS</strong> Crosstabs procedure can also be used to analyze<br />

contingency tables, with independence as a common focus in the analyses. However,<br />

even in small tables, detecting the cause of departures from independence may be<br />

difficult. The utility of correspondence analysis lies in displaying such patterns for twoway<br />

tables of any size. If there is an association between the row and column variables—<br />

that is, if the chi-square value is significant—correspondence analysis may help reveal<br />

the nature of the relationship.<br />

Homogeneity analysis tries to produce a solution in which objects within the same category<br />

are plotted close together and objects in different categories are plotted far apart.<br />

Each object is as close as possible to the category points of categories that apply to the<br />

object. In this way, the categories divide the objects into homogeneous subgroups. Variables<br />

are considered homogeneous when they classify objects in the same categories<br />

into the same subgroups.<br />

For a one-dimensional solution, homogeneity analysis assigns optimal scale values<br />

(category quantifications) to each category of each variable in such a way that overall,<br />

on average, the categories have maximum spread. For a two-dimensional solution,<br />

homogeneity analysis finds a second set of quantifications of the categories of each variable<br />

unrelated to the first set, attempting again to maximize spread, and so on. Because<br />

categories of a variable receive as many scorings as there are dimensions, the variables<br />

in the analysis are assumed to be multiple nominal in optimal scaling level.<br />

Homogeneity analysis also assigns scores to the objects in the analysis in such a way<br />

that the category quantifications are the averages, or centroids, of the object scores of<br />

objects in that category.<br />

Relation to other Categories procedures. Homogeneity analysis is also known as multiple<br />

correspondence analysis or dual scaling. It gives comparable, but not identical, results<br />

to correspondence analysis when there are only two variables. Correspondence<br />

analysis produces unique output summarizing the fit and quality of representation of the<br />

solution, including stability information. Thus, correspondence analysis is usually preferable<br />

to homogeneity analysis in the two-variable case. Another difference between the<br />

two procedures is that the input to homogeneity analysis is a data matrix, where the rows<br />

are objects and the columns are variables, while the input to correspondence analysis<br />

can be the same data matrix, a general proximity matrix, or a joint contingency table,<br />

which is an aggregated matrix where both the rows and columns represent categories of<br />

variables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!