Baire Category, Probabilistic Constructions and Convolution Squares
Baire Category, Probabilistic Constructions and Convolution Squares
Baire Category, Probabilistic Constructions and Convolution Squares
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Exercise 9.8. Using the same kind of methods as we used to establish Theorem<br />
7.3, establish the following result.<br />
If q is an integer with q ≥ 1, then, given any α > 1/(2q), there exists a<br />
probability measure µ such that<br />
|ˆµ(r)| ≤ |r| α<br />
for all r = 0, but, given distinct points x1, x2, ..., xq ∈ supp µ, the only<br />
solution to the equation<br />
q<br />
mjxj = 0<br />
with mj ∈ Z is the trivial solution m1 = m2 = · · · = mq = 0.<br />
j=1<br />
Notice that there is a very big gap between the result of Exercise 9.8 <strong>and</strong><br />
the result of Lemma 7.1.<br />
Exercise 9.9. Consider the independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables Yu <strong>and</strong> the r<strong>and</strong>om<br />
measure<br />
σ = n −1<br />
n<br />
δYu<br />
u=1<br />
introduced in Lemma 8.4.<br />
Show that, provided n is large enough, the probability that more than<br />
n1/2 (log n) 1/2 nq of different q-tuples j(1), j(2), ..., j(q) satisfy<br />
q<br />
k=1<br />
mkYj(k) ∈ [n −q+1/2 ,n −q+1/2 ] (⋆)<br />
is very small indeed. By removing one element Yj(1) corresponding to every qtuple<br />
which satisfies ⋆, show that with high probability, the set Y1, Y2, ...,Yn<br />
contains a subset {W1, W2, ...,Wv} with v ≥ n − n1/2 (log n) −1/2 with the<br />
following property. If j(1), j(2), ..., j(q) are distinct integers with 1 ≤<br />
j(k) ≤ v then<br />
q<br />
k=1<br />
mkYj(k) /∈ [n −q+1/2 ,n −q+1/2 ].<br />
Let τ = v −1 v<br />
u=1 δYu. By comparing ˆ<br />
τ(r) <strong>and</strong> ˆσ(r) show that there exists<br />
an A depending only on q such that, if n is large enough, then, with high<br />
probability<br />
|ˆτ(r)| ≤ An −1/2 (log n) 1/2<br />
for all 1 ≤ |r| ≤ n 4q .<br />
Hence show that we can replace the condition α > 1/(2q) in Exercise 9.8<br />
by the condition α > 1/(2q + 1<br />
2 ).<br />
34