"*o"rw - Washoe County, Nevada

DATE:
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
March 24,2008
WASHOE COUNTY
"Dedicated To Excellence in Public Seruice"
www.co.washoe.nv.us
Surr Rnponr
BOARD MEETING DATE: April 15, 2008
Board of County Commissioners
David M. Solaro, Director, Capital Projects Division
Telephone: 328-3 624, Email: dsolaro@washo ecounty.us
Dan St. John, P.E., Public Works Director
"*o"rw
Finance
DA fL
RiskMgt. N/A
HR N/A
Cowts
Acknowledge the Court Complex Master Plan Update as a valid
identification of the long-term space requirements for the Downtown Court
Complex and provide direction to staffon proceeding with the expansion of
the Downtown Courts Compler (Commissioner District - Atl)
This item is for acknowledgement by the Board of County Commissioners of the Court Complex
Master Plan Update and requests direction to staff
County Priority/Goal supported by this item: Promote Financial Accountability of Washoe
County
PREVIOUS ACTION
January 12,1999 - The Board of County Commissioners approved a Consultant Agreement with
Tate & Snyder Architects and Dan L. Wiley and Associates, Inc. for a Master Plan Update ofthe
Courts Complex.
March 27,2007 - The Board of County Commissioners directed staffto conduct a special
meeting in regards to the Master Plan process and the relation to work necessary for
development of the Pioneer site.
4pr1123,2007 - The Board of County Commissioners conducted a special meeting to discuss
with staffthe Court Master Plan process and the development ofthe Pioneer site.
May 15, 2007 - The Board of County Commissioners approved the award for professional
services to Lundahl and Associates for the Court Complex Master Plan Update project.
Septonber 25,2007 - The Board of County Commissioners accepted an update to the progress
ofthe Court Complex Master Plan Update.
November 20,2007 - The Board of County Commissioners accepted an update to the progress of
the Court Complex Master Plan Update.
AGENDA ITEM # /{

BACKGROT]ND
Washoe County Commission Meeting April 15, 2008
Court Complex Master Plan Update
Page 2 of 4
The objectives ofthe master plan update include:
1) Create a development roadmap that will include a series of facility construction,
renovation, and space reilrangement projects to support the growth ofthe Washoe
County court system;
2) Update the court filing and judicial position projections developed in the 1999 master
plan study to reflect population at community build out;
3) Determine the proportion ofthe county- owned property in downtown which must be
reserved for expansion; and
4) Review options for increasing utilization of current court facilities.
The Court Complex Master Plan Update project was initiated June l, 2007. To date the
consultant team has had numerous meetings with the using group advisory team comprisd of
members from: Second Judicial District Court (General Jurisdiction and Family Division), Reno
Justice Court, County Clerk, Sheriffs Office, District Attorney, Public Defender, Alternate
Public Defender, Alternative Sentencing, City of Reno Municipal Court, Facilities Management,
and the Law Library.
A series of four (4) workshops was held with the using group advisory team to discuss the
overall findings regarding position projections, adjacencies, and alternatives that were
developed. Based on the work of the consultants, the projection is that the Courts and court
related departments (Public Defender, Altemate Public Defender, County Clerk, Law Library,
Alternative Sentencing, Sheri$ and Facilities Management) will need a total of 530,000 gross
square feet (gsf) over the life of the study, which was tied to the projected build out of Washoe
County in about 2050. The County currently has a total of 250,000 gsf, not including the Mills
Lane Building (1 S. Sierra Street, South Tower), leaving a shortfall of 280,000 gsf The
consultants worked with staffto determine the effects of increased efficiencies, differing
business practices, and the subsequent changes in space requirements. These space needs were
continually reviewed during the process, to assure that we are providing for the most realistic
needs.
The Master Plan Update includes the development of alternative strategies to meet the space
needs of Washoe County. Nine options were initially developed by the consultants that meet the
general space needs of the project. The options included two groups of elements:
o All new construction.
o Combination ofre-use and new construction.
A single building development program is not remmmended at this time. Rather, in Chapter l0
the report presents two alternative approaches to accommodate 45judicial positions at
community build-out. The present value cost of these two altematives is relatively similar.
However, differences between the operational considerations of these two alternatives could be
significant, as one alternative provides for an increased level of consolidation for the Family
Division and the General Jurisdiction Division of the 2nd District Court between new
construction, the Historic Courthouse, and the 1965 Addition.

BACKGROUND (continued)
Washoe County Commission Meeting April 15, 2008
Court Complex Master Plan Update
Page 3 of4
To move forward with the Downtown Courts Expansion progranl the Board of County
Commissioners will need to provide direction to staffon the following issues. Staffproposes to
bring these items back to the Board for separate action during a series of meeting in the coming
months:
l. Refinement of the Phase One Project alternative: As stated, all long term expansion
alternatives contemplate a phase one of approximately 150-170 thousand gross square
feet on the Court Street parcel which is currently used for parking. Preferred alternatives
envision all or most of the District Court operations in the new Court Street buildings,
which appears to eliminate the desirability of adding two stories to the North Towei of I
S. Sierra Street. Staffwill be returning to the Board with a proposal to begin the
preliminary design for phase one in order to develop a "consensus" proposal to the
citizens of Washoe County.
2. Reservation of acreage on the Court Street lot for the future construction of Court
facilities: The Master Plan Update demonstrates many scenarios to meet future demands,
a1l ofwhich require less than the entire Court Street parcel to accomplish. Ofthe two
"preferred" alternatives (shown in Chapter l0), one utilizes one third ofthe parcel while
the other uses two thirds ofthe parcel. The most conservative option" meeting the "high"
range of the space projections, consumes two thirds ofthe parcel. Staffwill return to the
Board for authorization of the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with the Reno
Redevelopment Agency once RRA has drafted the agreement. Staffwill likely suggest
that Board take a conseryative position and reserve approximately two-thirds for the court
site, representing the alternative with the largest footprint on the Court Street parcel. This
would allow the remaining one-third, equivalent to 1.08 acres, to be redeveloped under
Washoe County's parallel effort.
3. Financing: Staffis developing a detailed proposal to explore altemative means of
financing the project. Alternative delivery methods, particularly those that lock in costs
earlier in the process are being considered. In general, the financing options will include
conventional debt financing using existing resources, ballot initiative(s), and/or
legislative appropriations or tax increase authorization.
4. Direction on utilization of court facilities: The study establishes that the court rooms
appear to be used efficiently in the dispensation ofjustice for the hours per week that they
are scheduled. The scope ofthe study does not expansively address utilization issues.
Staffwould like to discuss with the Board the feasibility of forming a court operations
team to more fully investigate the potential of increasing the hours of operation and/or
other strategies to increase building utilization and thereby reduce the number of new
courtrooms needed in the future.
5. Selection of "Ultimate" Courts Expansion Alternative: The master plan update did an
excellent job of exploring altematives with nearly every permutation of the following:
Reuse existing annex/jail vs. new construction; adding two stories to 1 S. Sierra Street vs.
a larger structure on Court Street lot; and converting Court Street to a pedestrian plaza vs.
Court Street remaining open to vehicular traffic. The District Court requests a scenario
that puts them into close proximity, ideally all eventually in a single building. This
favors an altemative that does not include the addition of two floors on I S. Sierra Street.
Staffis further evaluating the advantages and differential long- term costs between the

BACKGROUND (continued)
Washoe County Commission Meeting April 15, 2008
Court Complex Master Plan Update
Page 4 of4
identified options and will prepare a more detailed presentation ofthis issue to the Board
in the near future.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staffis developing a detailed proposal to explore alternative means of financing the project.
Alternative delivery methods, particularly those that lock in costs earlier in the process are being
considered. In general, the financing options will include conventional debt financing using
existing resources, ballot initiative(s), and/or legislative appropriations or tax increase
authorization.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners acknowledge the Court Complex
Master Plan Update as a valid identification of the long-term space requirements for the
Downtown Court Complex and provide direction to staffon proceeding with the expansion of
the Downtown Courts Complex.
POSSIBLE MOTIONS
Should the Board of County Commissioners agree with staffs recommendatior5 a possible
motion would be:
l. Move to acknowledge the Downtown Court Complex Master Plan Update;
2. Provide direction to staffon proceeding with the expansion of the Downtown Courts
Complex

Woshoe County Court
Complex Mqster Plqn Updote
CO l:I ABO RATIVE
DES IGN
STU DlOltcniler!ure of exntrrcfice alij p!or:*
!Jw,iJ. c{) ll0b0r0tivec€s lg n st x dlc. com
1 775.34E7777 r 7i5.348.0904
9444 D0UBLE Ii BIVD Sullf I : RENO l'lv 6952l
Reno. Nevodo
Droft Report
Morch 25, 2008
Volume I
THr SCS Gnoup
T 53S.54().44:8
F 53fi.546:0423
P"fi" llux 909
Krxcs &r*r-rL. CA

Poge 2 of 356

TABTE OF CONTENTS. VOLUME I
,..'on Tifl" pooe
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
A, 8ock9round,,,,,,,,,.,,.,. ,,,,,,.,.,.'.'."' I I
B. Objectives,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,, """,,12
C, Summory of Findings ,,,,,., ,,.,.,.,.', 13
D, Summory of Recommendotions,,,,,,,.,...,. ,,,.,,,,,,,' 16
Projeclions............... ...............19
A, Methodology,.,,,,,.,,.,.
B, Detoiled Projection of Judiciol Stoff Requirements,.,,.,,,,,,, ,",""' 2l
C, District Court Projection ,.,.,...",'.23
D, Reno Justice Court Projection .,,,,.,.,,.,,,,,,,'. 28
E, Court Support Stoff Requirements,., ...,..,,,""29
F, Projection Doto Relotionships,,,,,,,,,.,., .,,,,,,,,,,,30
Spoce Requirements............ ...................52
Adjocency Relotionships......... ...............55
Porking Requirements............ .................65
Operotions Anolysis ...............71
A, Night Court ,.,.,,,,,,,,.,.. 7l
B, Video Arroignment,,,,.,.,,,,,,, ,,','.' 80
C, Courfroom Utilizotion. .,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,.83
D. Spoce Requirements,.,.,,,,,,,,, ,.'.' 85
Focility Inventory .................".89
Focility Evoluqlion ..................98
A. One South Sierro Exponsion ,.,.,.,,,',98
8.A,1, Structurol Evoluotion Report ,,,,.,,,,'. 99
LA.2, Elevotor Copocity Report .,,,.,,,,,,,, l0l
8.A.3, MechonicolCopocity Report .,,,,,l04
8,A,4. Electricol System Evqluotion Report,,,,,, ,,,,.,,,' .|09
Poge 3 of 356

TABLE OF CONTENTS - VOLUME ICONTINUED
Section Title Pooe
B, Court Street Troffic Study ,,,,,,.,.,,,, I 14
8.8 Abondonment Feosibility Study., ,,,,,,,,,. I l5
C, Security Systems .,..,,125
D. Remodel of .|966 Addition,,, .,..126
E, Upgrode of Historic Courthouse,,,,,,,,.,.,.,, ,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, 127
8,E,.l Accessibility ond Code Complionce Site Survey: Historic
Courthouse )28
8,E,2 Accessibility ond Code Complionce Site Survey: .l965 North Towerl 33
F, Deferred Mointenonce,,,,.,,.,,,,, ..,,,,,,,,,.,,,,, .|36
9. Developmenf Allernqtives......... ...........138
A, Alternotives,,,,,.,,,,.,.,,., ,.,,,..,,,,.,,,, .l38
B, Cost Ano1ysis,,,,,,,.,.,,,. ,,,.,,,,.,,.,.,.,, l5l
C, Evoluotion ,,,,.,.,,,,,,.,. .|53
D, Alternotives for Workshop # 3 ,,.,.,,..,,,,,. ,,,,..,,,,,,, 155
E, Alternotives for Workshop #4 ,, ]59
F, Detoiled Cost Estimote ,,.,.,.,,., ,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,, 160
G, Description of Workshop No.4 Options, ,...,r.,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,. l6l
10. Recommended Developmenl Plon... ...................179
A. Finol Development Plon .,.,,,,.,, ,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, ]79
B. Development Concept - 4C ,,179
C, Spoce Allocotions - 4C,,,,.,., ,.,, l8l
D, Courtroom Allocotions - 4C .,,,,,,,, l8l
E, Cost Esiimote - 4C,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,182
F, Development Concept - 5A ,, .l99
G, Spoce Allocotions - 5A,.,,,,,, ..,. .|99
H, Courtroom Allocotions - 5A .,.,2OO
Poge 4 of 356

A.
B.
c.
D.
E.
l, Cost Estimote - 5A.,,,.,,,., .,,2OO
J, Comporotive Present Volue Anolysis,,,. ,,,,215
TABLE OF CONTENTS - VOTUME I CONTINUED
Section Title Pooe
K, Courtroom Distribution ,,,,,,,.,,,,,216
L, Comporotive Cost Estimote,,, ....222
M. Sensitivity Anolysis ..,222
N, lmplementotion Sequence .....229
O, lmplementotion Procedure .,,,,23O
P. Reloted Recommendotions,., .,.,,..,.,.,,..,.,,23.|
Spoce Requirements Dotobqse............. ...............234
Spoce Stondords ..................287
Security Syslems, Policies ond Operotions........ ...................313
Existing Courthouse Spoce Inventory. ..................315
Cosl Estimqle .......... .............322
END OF REPORT
Poge 5 of 356

TABLE OF EXHIBITS
No, Title Poge
2-1 District Court Coselood Distribution 1985-2050 ,,,33-34
2-2 Justice Court Coselood Distribution 1985-2050 , 35-36
2-3 Couri Stoff Summory .1985-2050,,.,.,.,.,, 37-38
2A District Court Filings ond Populotion, 1985-2050 ,,,.39
28 Disirict Court Generol Jurisdiction Division & Judiciol Positions ,.,,,.,,.,,,,,,40
2C District Court Fomily Division Filings & Judiciol Positions ,.,....,..41
2D District Courf Totol Filings & Judiciol Positions. ,,,.,.,..,..42
2E District Court Filing Rotes / .|,000 Populotion ,..,,,.,,,43
2F Reno Justice Court Filing Rotes / .|,000 Populotion ,,,,,,,,,.,,,,... 44
2G Reno Justice Court Filings & Judiciol Positions ,.,,.., 45
2H District Court Stoff & Rotios to Populotion & Judiciol Positions ...,.,,,.,,.,.,.46
2l District Court Stoff & Filings / Stoff Position ,,.,.,,,.,,,,,47
2J Reno Justice Court Stoff & Rotios to Pooulotion & Judiciol Position ....,..48
2K Reno Justice Court Stoff Filings / Stoff Position ,,,,,,.,...,.49
2L Totol Court Stoff Requirements ,,,.,.,,,.,, .,,,,,.,,,.,,,,,,,,. 50
3A Stoff ond Spoce Requirements Summory ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,.,. 53
4A Adjocency / Flow Diogrom - Reno Justice Couri,..,,.,, ,,.,.,.,,,. 59
48 Adjocency / Flow Diogrom - 2nd Judiciol District Court-Court Administrotor / Clerk
of Court .,,,,,,,,,,60
4C Adjocency / Flow Diogrom - 2no Judiciol District Court - Fomily Division,.,.,.,.,,.,,,,, 6l
4D Adjocency / Flow Diogrom - 2nd Judiciol District Court - Generol Jurisdiction
Division .,.,,.,,62
4E Adjocency / Flow Diogrom - Court Complex ,,.,,.,,63
5-l County Downtown Reno Porking Demond Summory ,,,..,,...,.67
5-2 County Downtown Porking Supply Summory ,.,,,,,, 68
5-3 Woshoe County Court Porking Requirements,.,,,,.,.,,, ,,,,.,.,..,,. 69
6-l Night Court Costs - Option A,,.,,,,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,.,,, 75
6-2 Doy Court Costs - Option A.,.,,,,.,.,,,, ,.,..76
6-3 Night Court Costs - Option 8,,,,.,.,,,,,,,, ...,....,.........,,,77
6-4 Doy Court Costs - Option B.,,,,,.,,,,,.,, ,,,...,.78
6-5 Night Court Scheduling,,,,,,,,,,, ,.,,,.,.,....,..79
Poge 6 of 356

7-1 Current Focility Net Squore Feet Inventory Summory .,",,,,,.'.' 90
TABLE OF EXHIBITS - CONTINUED
No, Tifle
Poge
7-2 Cunent Spoce Inventory, ,,,,."'."" 9l
7-3 Bosement Existing Site Plon ',',"'.""",""" 92
7-4 Existing Site Plon - First F1oor,,,,,,,., ',',,.'."" 93
7-5 Existing Site Plqn - Second F1oor.,,,,,,., ""94
7-6 Existing Site Plon - Third Floor,.,.,,,,, "'."", 95
7-7 Existing Site Plon - Fourth Floor,,,,,,.,.
9-l Woshoe County Courts Complex Moster Plon Aeriol View
",,', 96
,,,,.,.,..,,.,,,,,. .|40
9-2 Woshoe County Courts Complex Moster Plon Site Moster Plon ,,,,,',','."',',,,,..'.'."' l4l
9-3 Spoce Development Component (NSF) .."'."',,," 142
9-4 Alternotive l-A,...,.,,,,., '.,',','.," .l43
9-5 Alternotive l-8.,.,,,,,,.,,
9-6 Alternotive 2-A...,.,,,,,...
"".",.' 144
,,,,,.'.'. .l45
9-7 Alternotive 3-A,,,.,,,,,,., ,,""'.,' 146
9-8 Alternotive 4-A.,.,,,.,,,,,
9-9 Alternotive 48,,.,,,,,,.,.,,
"..,,,.,..147
'.'."",, .l48
9-10 Alternotive 4-C .,,,,,,.,,, """',,' 149
9-l I Development Sequences for Alternotives.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, .'.'."'.",,, .|50
9-12 Development Cost Anolysis,,., .',',,',".." ]56
9-13 Moster Progrom Budget,,.,, ".',",..',""", .|57
9-14 Generol Summory Option I B ,.,,,.,,,,,,, .. 158
9-15 Moster Plon Alternotive 4B,,..,,,.,,,,, .""" 162
9-.16 Moster Plon Alternotive 4-8.l,.,.,.,.,, .",,,,,.' .|63
9-17 Moster Plon Alternotive 4C,,,.,..,,,,, "."', 164
9-]8 Moster Plon Alternotive 4C-l ,.,,,,,,, ,,,.'.' .|65
9-.l9 Moster Plon Alternotive 5A.,,.,,,,,,,, '."'.' ]66
9-2O Moster Plon Alternotive 5B,,,,,,,.,.,,, ,,,'..' 167
9-21 Moster Plon Alternotive 6,4 ,,,,,,,.,.,, ,,',,.' .|68
9-22 Totolspoce Required ',,.'."" ]69
9-23 Courtroom & Heoring Room Assignment & Development'.",, '."",,.'."' .|70
9-24 Unknown. ',."""",, l7l
Poge 7 of 356

9-25 2050 Spoce Allocotions - Option 48 ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,.172
TABLE OF EXHIBITS - CONTINUED
No, Title Pooe
9-26 Spoce Allocotions - Option 4C..,.....,.... ....173
9-27 Spoce Allocotions - Option 5A.,,,,,,,,.,,,, ,.,.174
9-28 Spoce Allocotions - Option 58,,,,,,.,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,, .l75
9-29 Spoce Allocotions - Option 6,4 ,.,.,,,,,,,, ....,...........176
9-30 Development Cost Anolysis - 45 Judiciol Positions,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,............. 177
l0-l Site Plon 4C,,.,.,.,..,., ,,,,,.,,,,,,, .l84
1O-2 Site Option 4C,,,,,,,,, ,.,,,,,.,.,.,., 185
l0-3 Option 4C - 2050 Spoce Allocotions,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,, 186
l0-4 Option 48,4C &58-FirstLevel -OneSouthSierro .,,.,.,,,.,,, .l87
l0-5 Option 48, 4C & 58 - Second Level - One South Sierro .,,,.,,, 188
l0-6 Option 48, 4C & 58 - Third Level - One South Sierro,.,,,.,, .,., .l89
1O-7 Option 48, 4C & 58 - Fourth Level - One South Sierro.,.,,.,. ,,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,., .l90
l0-8 Option 48, 4C & 58 - Fifth Level - One South Sierro,,,,,,,, ,.,., l9l
l0-9 Option 48, 4C & 6 - First Level - Historic Cour|house,,,,,.,,,,.,,,, ,,,,.,,..,.... 192
l0-10 Option 48, 4C & 6 - Second Level - Historic Courthouse ,,,,,,,,.,,.,,, ,,.,,, I93
l0-l I Focility Development Sequence - 4C.,,,,,...... ,,,., 194
10-12 Develooment Option 4C Present Volue Cost,.,.,.... ,,,,,, .l95-.|96
l0-13 Development Costs - Option 4C .,,,,,,,,,., ............. 197
l0-.|4 Annuol Development Costs - Option 4C,.,,,,.,,,,,, ,,..,.,,,,,,.,,,, .l98
10-15 Site Plon 5A,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,.,.,201
10-16 Site - Option 54,,,.,,,,,,,, .............2O2
l0-l 7 2050 Spoce Allocotions - Option 5A ,.,.,,,., ,,,,,,,,,.,., 203
l0-18 Options 5A & 6 - First Level - One South Sierro,..,.,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,2O4
l0-]9 Options 5A & 6 - Second Level- One South Sierro .,,,,.,.,.,., 205
l0-20 Ootions 5A & 6 - Third Level - One South Sierro,,.,,,., ....,.,.,.,206
10-21 Option 5A - First Level - Historic Courthouse.,.,.,,..,.,.,, .,.,...,.2O7
10-22 Option 5A - Second Level - Historic Courthouse............... ,,208
l0-23 Ootion 5A - Third ond Fourth Levels - Historic Courl'house ,,,.,,,,,.,,,, ,.,.2O9
10-24 Focility Development Sequence - Option 54.,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, 2.|0
l0-25 Development Option 5A Present Volue Cost,.,,,,,,,, .,,,.,211-212
Poge B of 356

10-26 Development Costs - Option 5A,,,,,.,,,.,., .,.213
TABLE OF EXHIBITS. CONTINUED
No, Title Poge
10-27 Annuol Development Costs - Option 5A,,,,,., .,...214
l0-28 Phosed Develooment Courtroom Allocotion - Alternotive 4C .,,.,,.,..,219
10-29 Phosed Develooment Courtroom Allocotion - Alternotive 5A - Option 1 ,,,.,.,..,220
l0-30 Phosed Development Courlroom Allocotion - Alternotive 5A - Option 12 ,,,,.,.,221
'10-31 Present Volue Cost Comporison ........224
10-32 Option Development Comporison .,,.225
l0-33 Develooment Cost Comoorison - Cumulotive ond Present Volue ,,,.226
10-34 Phose 1 Occuponts,,,,,,.,.,... .....227
l0-35 Sensitivity Anolysis for Alternotive 4C / Alternotive 5A .,..,..,228
10-36 Project Schedule ,.,,,,, 233
Poge 9 of 356

Poge 10of356
I. INTRODUCTION

Poge 1 I of356

I. INTRODUCTION
A. Bockground
Lundohl & Associotes, o Reno bosed orchitecture, plonning ond design firm, wos
selected by Woshoe County in 2OO7 to develop the Woshoe County Court Complex
Moster Plon Updote of the previously completed .l999 Court Focilities Moster Plon, The
nome of the firm hos since been chonged to the Colloborotive Design Studio, The SGS
Group, o focilities moster plonning ond spoce progromming firm, serves os o subconsultont
to the orincipol firm,
The spoce needs ossessment, spoce progromming ond moster plonning process begon
with o kickoff meeting in eorly Februory 2007 during which the process wos exploined, o
schedule developed, consultont ond client time commitments identified ond reloted
issues oddressed ond resolved. The project initiotion meeting wos ottended by one or
more representotives of the following Woshoe County deporiments ond courl
ogencies:
. Alternote Public Defender
o AlternotiveSentencing
. County Clerk
. District Attorney
. Low Librory
. Public Defender
. Reno Justice Court
o )nd Judiciol District Court
. County Sheriff
. Deportment of Public Works
. County Monogers Office
The progromming questionnoire wos presented by the consultont, confirmed by the
county ond distributed to oll mojor components, The consultont conducted follow-up
interviews in June ond July, 2OO7 ofter the questionnoires were completed, in order to
clorify issues roised by the questionnoire responses ond to observe deportment
operotions ond spoces in person, The first droft spoce requirements dotobose wos
completed by the consultont shortly thereofter ond o second round of interviews
conducted to ossure thot oll needs hod been identified, Over the next severol months
o series of interoctive workshops with representotives of the included ogencies were
conducted by the consultont, Findings, conclusions ond other moteriol resulting from
the plonning process were presented of eoch workshop ond comment from the county
porticiponts solicited ond often vigorously provided,
Poge 12 of356

B. Objectives
The objectives estoblished for this Court Focility Moster Plon Updote Study included the
following:
'l t.
2.
{
4.
tr
6.
Develop o plon to support continued growth of court filings in the Woshoe
County District Court ond the Reno Township Justice Court. Current requirements
to odd two District Court - Fomily Division judges in 2008 require immediote
development of oppropriote focilities within existing spoce, Guidonce is
required to identify the optimum locotion for the development of chombers ond
heoring rooms to support two odditionol Fomily Court positions in o monner thot
is consistent with the long-ronge utilizotion of existing spoce to support future
District Court ond Reno Justice Court operotions,
Updote court filing ond judiciol position projections developed in the .l999 Moster
Plon Study to reflect future requirements to support Woshoe County populotion
ot community build-out, which is estimoted of between 700,000 ond 800,000
populotion to occur in the 2O4O - 2050 timefrome,
Determine the proporlion of the odjocent Pioneer site, which the County
purchosed o number of yeors ogo to supporl future court exponsion, which must
be reserved to support coniinued development of court focilities odjocent to the
Historic Courthouse to support community build-out level court requirements. This
will then identify the omount of Pioneer site oreo thot con be releosed to
developers for the development of porking focilities to support the Woshoe
County court system ond commerciol/retoil/residentiol development to
enhonce the Virginio Street corridor ond moximize the development potentiol of
the 2,79 ocre Pioneer site,
Previous proposols to odd floors to One South Sierro ond to redevelop Levels 2
ond 3 of the .l965 Court Addition, which wos formerly occupied by detention
focilities, hove been roised, lt is on objective of this Moster Plon to resolve the
feosibility of these two exponsion/conversion opportunities ond to determine the
cost, functionol compotibility, ond feosibility of incorporoting those
exponsions/renovotion spoces within the Moster Plon.
With the development of the Mills B, Lone focility ond the relocotion of the
District Attorney into the upper floors, the second floor of the .l965 Addition hos
become ovoiloble. There hove been previous proposols for its renovotion ond
reuse, This Moster Plqn will identify the preferred occuponcy for this 6,537 squore
foot spoce resource within o context thot is compotible with the long-ronge
moster plon,
The overoll objective of this Moster Plon Updote Study is to develop o
development rood mop thot will include o series of focility construction,
renovotion, ond spoce reorrongement projects to support the continued groMh
of the Woshoe County court system from the current 24 equivolent judiciol
Poge 13 of356

positions to on estimoted 45 judiciol positions of community build-out, some 30 or
40 yeors in the future,
Poge l4of356

C. Summory of Findings
Following is on executive summory of the findings of this Woshoe County Court
Complex Moster Plon Updote Study.
L Woshoe County populotion is forecost to continue to grow of oround between .l,5%
ond L7o/o pet yeor to o projected community build-out of between 700,000 to
800,000 populotion by the yeor 2050 under current density ond development
guidelines, lt is necessory to utilize Woshoe County community build-out populotion
os the bosis of projecting future court filings, which ore then reloted to the number
of judiciol positions, ond thereby the number of courtrooms ond ultimotely to the
totol spoce required in the courts complex.
2.
J.
4.
Although there hove been significont long-term increoses in Fomily Jurisdiction Court
filings in the post decode, the totol increose in District Court filings hos been
relotively modest over the post five yeors, increosing of oround .690/o par yeor. This is
slower thon the rote of growth of populotion.
The Reno Township Justice Court coselood hos olso been foirly stoble recently with
onnuol rotes of increose over the post six yeors growing somewhot greoter thon
populotion of the Reno Township, which hos been estimoted of 65"/" of the Woshoe
County populotion,
Future projections do not see on increose in court filings of the Fomily, Generol
Jurisdiction, or the Justice Court thot ore disproportionote to whot populotion
increoses would generote utilizing the current filings rote per thousond populotion
experienced by the courts,
Similorly, we see no significont trends thot would suggest thot cose complexity or the
mix of coses is such thot it would generote on increosed level of judiciol resources
beyond o proportionote increose in the number of coses filed,
We hove forecost thot, by community build-out, the current totol District Court filings
will increose from just over .|6,000 in the yeor 2006 to 30,.|00 in the yeor 2050, This will
require the current 20 judiciol positions to be increosed to 35 positions, on increose
of l5 judiciol positions requiring o corresponding increose in spoce within the courts
comolex,
Additionoljudiciol positions for the Justice Courl ore ollocoted bosed upon one per
every 50,000 or portion thereof fownship populotion, While we forecost thot the
cunent level of 65,870 filings for 20O6 will increose to upwords of .l50,000 filings three
decodes from now, we olso recognize thot the number of judiciol positions is
estoblished by the Stote Legisloture bosed on the estimoted Reno Township
populotion of 455,000 in yeor 2050, This would limit the number of Justice Court
officers to not greoter thon ten.
Poge 15of356

5, This report recognizes these increoses in the number of judiciol positions to
community build-out ond develops spoce requirements to support 35 judiciol
officers in the District Court ond ten judiciql officers in the Justice Court by the yeor
2050,
6. Opportunities to reduce the number of courtrooms required ore very limited bosed
upon our onolysis of the level of utilizotion ond feosibility of initioting o limited night
courT,
7, While full utilizotion of video orroignment by the Generol Jurisdiction Division of the
District Court could possibly reduce the need for one courtroom in the long-term
future, there is reluctonce on the port of the District Attorney. Public Defender, ond
the Court to initiote full video orroignment proceedings, While we hove mode no
reduction in the number of District Courtrooms required, we recommend thot video
orroignment be further studied by the County ond the Court to identify economies
thot moy be initioted on o poriiol bosis,
8, The One South Sierro Courthouse hos been designed to occommodote odding two
floors within the existing structurol design, We find this construction, while disruptive,
is opproximotely os cost effective os new construction ond if implemented, could
occommodote the long-ronge needs of both the Justice Court ond the Fomily
Division of the 2no District Court in One South Sierro, This reduces the need to build
more spoce on the Pioneer site ond increoses its development potentiol,
9, Our onolysis of the feosibility of converting the currently unused joil on the second
ond third floors of the .|965 Addition finds there is no structurol or building code
impediment to remodeling ond utilizing the .l4,000 NSF thot would be ovoiloble. This
renovotion con be completed of cost per squore foot thot is less thon the cost of
equivolent new construction,
.l0, Our review of the Historic Courthouse finds there ore substontiol impediments to
improving the utilizotion of spoce within this historic structure. Code conditions, fire
exits, ADA complionce, ond historic preservotion considerotions will severely limit the
obility to improve spoce utilizotion ond there is no woy to increose the number of
courirooms within the focility without violoting one of the conditions ond constroints.
Renovotion will be expensive, difficult to implement, ond most disruptive,
1 '1, Opportunities to link new construction to the existing Historic Courthouse by crossing
over ond/or closing Court Street between Virginio Street ond Sieno Street ore not
fovored by the City of Reno, Not being oble to link new construction to the Historic
Courthouse will increose operoting costs ond require porollel security systems of o
cost in excess of 5200,000 per yeor, A new court focility thot could link to the Historic
Courlhouse or be occommodoted with o significont occupioble bridge coupled
with the closure of the Court Street fo vehiculor troffic could significontly improve
operotionol effectiveness of the courts, reduce costs, ond occommodote one
entronce ond o consolidoted filing office in new construction thot would reploce
the 1965 Addition,
Poge 16of356

12, Some modest operotionol sovings will be enjoyed by the District Court if the Fomily
ond the Generol Jurisdiction Divisions ore locoted in the some building or of leost in
o complex connected by o secured possogewoy, for exomple, o new court tower
built on the Pioneer site, linked obove Court Street to the Historic Courthouse with oll
Fomily ond Generol Jurisdiction Courts contoined within either of those two
buildings, This would occommodote one centrol filing office ond minimize tronsit
time between two seporote buildings for the District Court,
.|3, lf the Fomily Court wos to vocote spoce on the third floor of One South Sierro, the
spoce ovoiloble within the existing building would be more thon sufficient to
occommodote the long-term need for ten judiciol positions to support the Reno
Justice Court,
.l4, The Public Defender ond Alternotive Public Defender who currently occupy leose
spoce should be consolidoted into the courts complex, Both offices should mointoin
their own identity ond considerotion might be given for seporote entronces to ovoid
the perception thqt the Public Defender is port of the court system ond District
Attorney who is prosecuting the Public Defender clients, In the long-term, the
County con reduce occuponcy costs by eliminoting leose spoce ond consolidoting
oll offices into County-owned spoce.
15, Over two-thirds of the Pioneer site will be required to support future
requirements for 45 judiciol positions if oll new construction must be
occommodoted on the Pioneer site, Reduced relionce on the Pioneer site
con be ochieved if One South Sierro is exponded verticolly ond if the ,|965
Addition to the Historic Courthouse is reploced by o six or seven-level building
thot would provided os much os .l507o of the usoble spoce thot is currently
ovoiloble,
.|6, The movement of persons in-custody within the .|965 Addition ond the Historic
Courthouse through public spoces produces o significont security concern. We
connot identify ony meons to eliminote the movement of persons in-custody in the
some possogewoys os judiciol officers ond visitors to the Courthouse, There is no
reosonoble meons of renovotion thot is cost effective thot con improve the security
on Levels 2 through 4 of these buildings,
17, The cunent courtrooms ore utilized between 640/o and 71"/" of the time when toking
into considerotion thot the courfrooms ore scheduled for numerous events thot, for
one reoson or onother, do not tronspire including continuonces, eorly settlement,
ond foilure to oppeor, We do not find there would be ony significont decreose in
the number of courtrooms required by ottempting to increose the level of utilizotion
of existing courtrooms by chonging the current scheduling system,
ts,Continued utilizotion of the 1965 Addition ond the Historic Courthouse will
require implementotion of deferred mointenonce including building
mechonicol upgrodes, correction of fire-life sofety meosures with on
Poge 17 of356

estimoted current 2008 cost of over SB million, Most of the costs con be
ovoided by replocing the .l965 Addition,
.l9, All olternotives studied con continue to occommodote the Morrioge License Bureou
of the County Clerk in o locotion thot could occommodote occess without
necessitoting octivotion of full courthouse security, We olso find thot the nonmorrioge
license functions of the County Clerk could be occommodoted just os
effectively if locoted of the Wcrshoe County Government Center, This would free up
opproximotely 3,500 NSF thot could be used for other deporfments thqt hove o
more criticol presence in the courts complex or could reduce the omount of new
construction thot would otherwise be required.
20, Currently the Historic Courthouse, the 1965 Addition, the unoccupied joil on
the second ond third floors of the 1965 Addition, ond One South Sierro
provide o resource of obout 250,000 gross squore feet (GSF), This includes
168,576 net squore feet (NSF) of which 20,000 NSF is currently unoccupied,
Net squore feet is used os the bosis of comporison throughout this report,
2l,Adjusting to oppropriote spoce ollocotion stondords os utilized in the .l999 Moster
Plon study ond in work conducted by this consultont for the Clork County court
system, the Reno Justice Court ond the 2no District Court currently require 216,987
NSF, This includes on ollocotion of 17,382 NSF for the Public Defender ond the
Alternotive Public Defender who ore not currently occuponts of the focility ond
odequote spoce to conect current deficiencies, This would indicote thot those
deportments thot currently occupy 148,576 NSF in the courts complex in reolity
require .l96,8.l0 NSF ond there is o deficiency of over 48,000 NSF or opproximotely
32o/" of the spoce currently ovoiloble,
22. Currently the 25 equivolent Judiciol positions (EJP) including 5,75 mogistrotes
occupy 148,576 NSF of on overoge of 5,943 NSF per EJP, They require on overoge of
8,679 NSF / EJP in 2008, With groMh ond economics to scole, in 2050, 352,529 NSF
will be required to support 45 EJP ot on overoge of 7,834 NSF / EJP,
23, After correcting for current spoce deficiencies ond supporting the cunent stoff
complimenl of 425 positions in the deportments thot ore included in the study, it will
be necessory to provide on odditionol 135,542 NSF (2O2,OO0 GSF) to support
increoses over the next 42 yeors to the yeor 2050 to support increoses in filings ond
stoff ond provide occommodotions oppropriote for 45 judiciol positions,
To support the forecost 45 judiciol positions it will be necessory to provide o totol of
352,529 NSF by 2050, This converts to opproximotely 526,000 GSF oI o 67"/" rotio of
net to gross oreo, This, in turn, represents on increose of over 280,000 GSF from the
current inventory of 250,000 GSF,
24, While heoring rooms for two odditionol judiciol officers in the Fomily Court ore
currently being plonned for with the renovotion of the first floor of the One South
Sierro building, it is highly likely there will be o need for two odditionol judiciol
Poge lB of 356

positions within the Generol Jurisdiction ond possibly one position in the Justice Court
over the next six yeors, prior to the obility of the County to initiote on orderly process
of finoncing, design, ond construction for the first phose of the new judiciol center
developed on the Pioneer site,
It will thus be necessqry to identify the most cost-effective meons of providing
temporory occommodotions for two or three odditionol judiciol positions within the
existing focilities on on interim bosis. Considerotion should be given to utilizing the
unused portion of the second floor of the .l965 Addition formerly occupied by the
District Attorney for temporory courtrooms until the new Judiciol Center is ovoiloble
in 2013,
D. Summory of Recommendqlions
One building development progrom is not recommended of this time, Rother, in
Chopter l0 this reporl' presents two olternotive opprooches to occommodote 45
judiciol positions of community build-out, The present volue cost of these two
olternotives ore relotively similor with o vorionce of only 4.6"/". The operotionol
considerotions of these two olternotives could be significont, os one olternotive
provides on increosed level of consolidotion for the Fomily Division ond the Generol
Jurisdiction Division of the 2nc District Court between new construction ond the Historic
Courthouse ond the .|965 Addition,
Thus the following recommendotions opply equolly to the two of the olternotives to be
considered by the County Commissioners.
l, Accept this Moster Plon Updote Report os o volid identificotion of the very long-term
spoce requirements for the Court to support community build-out, Embroce the
development of o phosed development moster plon thot con occommodote 45
judiciol positions of community build-out.
2, Authorize County monogement to proceed with continuing studies to evoluote the
odvontoges ond differeniiol costs between Option 4C ond Option 5A, explore the
possibility of closing Court Street between Virginio Street ond Sieno Street, ond
conduct deliberotions os oppropriote to select one of the two olternotives os the
bosis of proceeding with schemotic design ond cost verificotion in 2009,
Recommended Option 4C develop o totol of 510,300 GSF with 353,300 GSF of new
construction including the replocement of the .|965 Addition ond Option 5A
develops o totol of 526, 866 GSF with 276,886 GSF of new construction,
3. Provide funding necessqry to initiote further studies ond schemotic design beginning
in Jonuory 2OO9, which will leod to construction of Phose I of the new Judiciol Center
on the Pioneer site in 2011, which would occommodote occuponcy in the new
focility by mid 20.l3,
Poge 19of356

4. Work wiih the Court to develop o neor-term, temporory meons to occommodote
two or three odditionol judiciol positions in the spoce cunently vocont on the
second floor of the .l965 Addiiion,
6
6,
7.
Concurrent with determining whether Option 4C or 5A is to be initioted, identify thot
portion of the Pioneer site thot con be releosed to o privote developer for purposes
of providing odditionol porking focilities in conjunction with more intensive office or
commerciol development on the site.
lf sufficient porking resources connot be provided os o result of soliciting proposols
for privote-sector developers to construct porking ond other development on thot
portion of the Pioneer site thot con be releosed for development, ond odditionol
porking resources ore required, conduct o study to identify condidote sites within
four blocks of the courthouse complex thot could be ocquired by the County to
provide qdditionol porking resources to supplement the Pioneer site copobility thot
will be needed to support 2050 requirements,
Evoluote olternotive mechonisms to fund the initiol construction of Phose I of the
Judiciol Center on the Pioneer site, This could hove o cost ronging from $95 million
to $l l5 million including inflotion ond soft costs,
Poge 20 of 356

Poge 21 of356
2. PROJECTIONS

Poge 22 of 356

2. PROJECTIONS
Projections of future requirements for the Woshoe County Courts, which is composed of
both the Generol Jurisdiction Division ond the Fomily Division ond the Reno Justice
Court, ore reloted to o number of judiciol positions required, Judiciol positions ore in
turn reloted to courl cose filings, which in turn is reloted to the filing rote per thousond
county populotion (in the cose of the Justice Court, it is reloted to the filings per Reno
Township populotion, which is opproximotely 65"/" of the Woshoe County populotion),
This moster plon estoblished os o primory gool the development of o long-ronge
perspective ond the consultont wos osked to develop o spoce requirements dotobose
thqt would reflect mqximum spoce requirements for oll court components of county
populotion build out, which is generolly believed to be ot oround 700,000 populotion
bosed upon current zoning, urbon plonning oreos, ond development density. This
would reflect on increose of obout 80% from the current populotion in 2007 of 390,000,
A. Methodology
The onolysis developed by the consultont teom to determine the number of judiciol
positions, ond then loter court support stoff necessory to support those judiciol positions,
ond finolly spoce requirements necessory to support judiciol positions ond stoff followed
o seven-step process:
L Project future county ond township populotion of community build-out,
2,
{
4.
A,
6,
ldentify historicol court filings ond colculote the filing rote per thousond
populotion,
Colculote the overoge rote of increose of court filings ond filings per thousond
populotion for the 20- yeor timefrome represented by doto provided in the I999
Moster Plon for .l985 through 1999 ond updoted in this current study for the .|999
through 2006 timefrome,
Colculote the rqte of chonge in filings rote per thousond for the some timefrome
ond then evoluote the 2O-yeor, 1O-yeor, ond 6-yeor trends to determine which
trend might be most opplicoble to use os the bosis of identifying future rotes of
increose of filing rotes per thousond populotion,
With the estoblishment of o rote of increose or decreose in the filing rotes per
thousond populotion it is then possible to estimote the totol filings in future yeors
bosed upon the populotion levelserved,
Historicol trends in the number of judiciol (or equivolent) positions needed to
process the filings ore not evqluoted to determine if the trend is up (increosed
cose complexity) or down (economies to scole or tronsfer of work to stoff), A
review of the historicol number of judiciol positions ond filings thot were
odjudicoted in eoch yeor provides o relotive level of throughput in the court.
Filings per judiciol position, ossuming no significont increose or decreose in
Poge 23 of 356

7.
bocklog, it wos then used to identify the trend in this filing rote per judiciol
position ond then develop o forecosted rote of filings per judiciol position to be
utilized in future yeors,
Dividing the totol number of filings by the forecost number of filings per judiciol
position would then result in o forecost of ihe number of equivolent judiciol
positions in future yeors. This process wos uniformly opplied to both the District
Court ond the Justice Court,
Poge 24 of 356

B. Detoil Projeclion of JudiciolStotf Requiremenls
Proiections
The spoce required in o court complex is directly reloted to the stoff thot must be
occommodoted ond the number of courtrooms plus the oncillory supporf oreos, The
number of courtrooms is, in turn, reloted to the number of judges or, in this onolysis. the
"equivolent" judiciol positions, The term "equivolent judiciol positions" includes
Mogistrotes, Mosters, qnd the equivolent judiciol resources provided by Senior Judges
ond oort-time Judiciol Officers,
The number of equivolent judiciol officers (used intermittently in the text of this report
with judges) required is then reloted fo the number of coses filed in the court ond the
number of cqses odjudicoted during eqch yeor by the judiciol resources,
Projecting the number of cose filings in eoch of the three courts included in this Moster
Plon Updote is, with the development of certoin porometers reloted to foctors offecting
the projection, reloted to the populotion served, There ore cerioinly modifiers to this
relotionship of court filings per 1,000 populotion, which is the index used in the onolysis,
Those modifiers include the oge of the populotion (different ot-risk groups, seniors for
probote, youth for juveniles, ond 18 - 35 yeors for criminol), the stotus of the locol
economy ond unemployment, The filings con olso be significontly impocted by the
presence of low enforcement octivity ond District Attorney chorging policy,
The ossignment in this Moster Plon Updote wos to updote the projections developed in
the .|999 Study, which utilized o rotio of filings per 1,000 populotion for eoch of the three
courts ond the number of court filings completed onnuolly, Neither the .l999 Study nor
this Updote utilizes o roted cose study opprooch to differentiote judiciol time ond
courtroom requirements for different types of coses, Thus, the projection ossumes o
relotively homogenous mixture of cose types within eoch of the three courts thot in the
future, will porollel the recent post. All cose types within eoch of the three courts ore
oggregoted into one projection of the totol coselood thot must be occommodoted by
the courts,
The .|999 Study provided excellent historicol doto on court filings, stoff, ond judiciol
positions from .|985 through .|999. This updote study odded similor doto for the yeors
2000 through 2006.
The originol ossignment directed by the County wos to develop o Moster Plon thot
would cover the next 25 yeors - nominolly to the yeor 2030, At thot juncture the
Woshoe County populotion would be obout 535,000 residents, The cunent populotion
bose for 2007 os used within this study for 2O06 is 390,212. lt wos decided to continue
the projection through "community build-out" ond to develop o focility moster plon
thot would not be shortsighted ond found wonting ofter 25 yeors,
Community build-out is defined os the consensus populotion estimote for the oreo
served by the courts, which is Woshoe County ond the Reno Township for the Justice
Court), when it is completely developed to full density given cunent zoning,
Poge 25 of 356

development densities, ond plonning guidelines, There is, of course, some difference
between the Stote, Woshoe County, ond the included communities (the City of Reno
ond the City of Sporks) regording whot thot populotion would be qnd estimotes ronge
between 700,000 ond 800,000 of moximum build-out. We hove chosen to utilize 700,000
os the bosis for developing o projection for "community build-out", Should we find thot
the populotion increoses in the future to opprooch 800,000, then it would be necessory
to occommodote obout l0% odditionol spoce from thot originolly projected to
occommodote o populotion of 700,000, We hove occommodoted thot possibility in
the development of site moster plons thot ollow horizontol exponsion of buildings of
vorious heights thot could occommodote o 1O7" increose qt eoch phose of
development by odding odditionol floors to buildings or providing lorger horizontol
wings, Jumping oheod, qnd finding thot the projection of equivolent judiciol positions
of q community build-out populotion level of 700,000 wos estimoted to be 45 positions,
o l07o odjustment would be roughly five (5) judiciol positions, This would equote to
opproximotely 40,000 gross squore feet of odditionol spoce,
This study develops projections for eoch of the three courts, the 2nd District Generol
Jurisdiction Court, 2no District Fomily Court, ond the Reno Justice Court seporotely, For
eoch court we reviewed the trends in court filings per 1,000 populotion over the
timefrome from .|985 to 2006 ond the rotio of court filings to ossigned equivolent judiciol
positions, We olso looked of trends in the totol suoport stoff found within the three
courts ond its relotionship to equivolent judiciol positions (EJP) served ond totol court
filings,
For eoch of these three relotionships we reviewed the 2O-yeor trend line doto from .l985
to 2006, 1O-yeor trend line from .|995 to 2006, ond the more recent 5-yeor trend line from
20O2 to 2006, Reviewing the three different trend lines ond overoge growth rote we
then developed on estimote of whot those filing rotes per 1,000 populotion ond the
number of filings thot could be odjudicoted by eoch judiciol position per yeor would be
in the future, Thot doto wos then utilized to develop the projection by opplying it to the
forecost populotion of the County for the 2no District Court ond the Reno Township for
the Reno Justice Courl',
Judges ore ollocoted by the Legisloture to the Reno Justice Court bosed upon one
judge per 50,000 populotion or portion thereof, Thus. ot o populotion of 455,000 in the
yeor 2050 for the Reno Township when the populotion of Woshoe County is 700,000,
would suggest provision of ten (10) judges,
Poge 26 of 356

C. Dishicl Courl Projeclion
District Court - Generol Jurisdiction
Exhibit 2-1 presents the District Court coselood distribution from .|985 ond os projected
to the yeor 2050 for the District Court Generol Jurisdiction ond Fomily Jurisdiction
Divisions. For the Generol Jurisdiction the totol filings hove decreosed from I l, 982 in
1985 to 7,106 filings in 2006. A lorge portion of the decreose in filings is o result of tronsfer
of those coses to the emerging Fomily Jurisdiction Court, which hod 2,398 filings in .|985
ond increosed to 8,898 filings in 2006, When combined, the Generol Jurisdiction ond
Fomily Jurisdiction filings were 14,380 in .|985 ond increqsed to .l6,004 filings in 2006, For
the District Court, over the timefrome, when the populotion increosed from 224,O5O in
1985 to 390,212in 2006, the rotio of.filings per 1,000 populotion octuolly decreosed from
64.2in 1985 to 4l ,01 in 2006,
Concurrent with this, the 1 1 ,5 judiciol positions found in .|985 increosed to 20.3 positions
in 2006, The totol number of onnuol filings processed per judiciol equivolent for the
entire District Court decreosed from .|,250 in .l985 to 790 in 2006.
Utilizing this doto ond looking more closely ot the trends in doto during the post five
yeors os being more representotive becouse, by now the Fomily Court is of some level
of moturity ond the tronsfer of coses between Generol Jurisdiction qnd Fomily
Jurisdiction should be stobilized wos used os the bosis of developing o projection of
future requirements,
The totol number of filings in the Generol Jurisdiction Division hos remoined relotively
constont between 2OO2 ond 2006 ronging between o low of 6,824 in 2OO2 ond o high of
7,43O in 2003, Since 2003 the number of filings hos octuqlly decreosed to 7,106 filings in
2006,
From .l985 to .|993 there were no judges ossigned to the Fomily Division, Becouse of this
ond becouse of significont shifts in coselood ossigned between Generol Jurisdiction
Division ond loter tronsferred to the Fomily Division, we hove elected to develop o
projection of totol District Courf judiciol positions bosed upon oll filings ond then, when
thot is estoblished, to determine on oppropriote ollocotion between Fomily Division ond
Generol Jurisdiction Division bosed upon the current distribution of coselood ond
judiciol positions including mosters, This onolysis utilizes doto provided in the 1999 Study
for yeors .|985 to .|999 ond doto provided by Woshoe County qnd the District & Justice
Courts for 2000 to 2006 os oresented in Exhibit 2,.|,
For the District Court in .l999 there were 38.97 filings per thousond populotion, In 2006
there were 41.01 filings per thousond populotion, The most recent five-yeor overoge is
41,73 filings per thousond populotion, The trend from 1999 to 2006 is o negligible
increose of .13"/" per yeor in filings per thousond populotion,
We do not see evidence of ony sociol or economic trend thot would suggest on
increose in the filing per thousond not recorded in the recent post qnd further believe
there moy be o trend to stobilize the filing rote qs would be evident if we took o longer
Poge 27 of 356

viewpoint of history ond utilized the 2O-yeor or 1O-yeor trend line, which octuolly shows o
slight decreose in the filing rote per thousond, We hove bosed the projection upon o
filing rote per thousond populotion for the entire District Court of 43 filed per 1000 which
is 5% higher thon in 2006 but equolto the overoge for the lost fire yeor,
This results in forecosting on increose to 43 District Court filings per thousond populotion
ot populotion moturity - generolly in the 2040 to 2050 timefrome, up from 40 filings per
thousond populotion currently. This is not seen os inconsistent with history os there wos
o filing rote of 44,55 per thousond in 2003 ond the 6-yeor overoge is 42,3 filings per
thousond populotion,
Concurrent with the chonges in totol filings ond filing rotes, the I.l,5 judiciol positions in
1985 hove increosed to o nominol 20,3 District Courl judiciol positions in 2007 , The filings
for judiciol positions were 1,25O in .l985 ond ore now in the ronge of 800 to 850, The
overoge over the lost six yeors is 988 filings per judiciol positions, We believe there is no
evidence to indicote thot the filings per judiciol position will significontly increose or
decreose in the future, however Woshoe County is exploring oll possible meqns of
outomotion to increose throughput ond hos mode importont odvonces in recent yeors,
We therefore recommend developing o projection of the number of judiciol positions
by ossuming on onnuol increose in filings per Judiciol position of ,4"/" per yeor,
This onolysis then results in o projection thot the 20,3 District Court judiciol positions will
increose to opproximotely 35 positions by the yeor 2050, When thot is ochieved, we will
then find thot, over the ensuing 42 yeors the following will result:
. Filings will increose 88%;
. Populotion will increose B0%.
. Filing rote per thousond populotion will be stoble of 43.
. Filings per judiciol position will increose slightly to 953,
. Judiciol positions will increose by 74"/o.
With the estoblishment of 35 judiciol positions we then, with rotio onolysis ond looking ot
current worklood ond coses filed per judiciol position in the Fomily Division ond Generol
Jurisdiction Division hove developed o projection on Exhibit 2-l thot of community
build-out there will be l7 Generol Jurisdiction judges ond l8 Fomily Court judges in the
District Court,
District Court - Fomilv Division
Currently the Fomily Division of the 2no District Court occommodotes four judges ond
5,757" mosters for o totol of 9,75"/"judiciol officers. The projections developed by the
Consultont Teom indicoted o future requirement for 18 judiciol positions, which reflects
on increose of 857" in the number of judiciol officers during o timefrome when the
populotion of Woshoe County will increose of 80%, This reflected o continuotion of the
Poge 28 of 356

current level of 24 courl filings per 1,000 populotion ond 900 filings per judiciol officer os
is slightly less thon is currently experienced.
The Fomily Court hos independently conducted on onolysis thot forecosts o
requirement for 38 equivolent judiciol positions to support the some populotion level ot
community build-out os the Consultont projected for 18 positions, This number of
judiciol positions, of the some rotio of court filings per judiciol position in future yeors os is
currently experienced, would indicote thot, of community build-out, there would be
5l ,4 Fomily Court filings per 1,000 populoiion in comporison to the current 22,8 filings per
1,000 populotion cunently experienced, This would reflect on increose of over I 25"/" in
the number of filings per .|,000 populotion incurred, While the Consultont does not see
justificotion for this level of increose in filings per 1,000 populotion bosed upon the more
recent trend line, which reflects, from 2003 to 2006, o modest decreose in filings per
1,000 populotion of 2.3"/" per yeor,
Comporison to Clork Countv Fomilv Court
It is instructive to summorize the stotistics for Woshoe County in 2006 ond os projected
for 2050 or the point in time when populotion reoches 700,000, ond to compore thot to
Clork County in 2006 when the populotion wos .|,9 million, The toble below presents the
comporison,
Comporison Cotegory
Wosho
e
County
2006
Wosho
e
County
2050
Clork
Count
y 2006
Populotion 390,212 700.000 1,900,0
00
z. Fomilv Court Judiciol Officers 9,75 t8
'18
3, Fomilv Court Filinos Ootol) I 1.1 39 20, r 55 43,173
4, Fomily Court Filings (Adjusted to coincide with .|999
8,898 r6,r00
q
studv doto)
Filinss/ .l,000 populotion 28,5 28,8 22.7
6,
7.
Filinos/Judiciol Officer
Judiciol Officers/ I 00,000 populotion
r,143
2.5
1,120
2.6
1,902
,95
In Clork County, the filings per judiciol officer ore significontly lorger thon in Woshoe
County - obout 7Oo/"lorger. This results in o judiciol officer per 100,000 populotion rotio in
Woshoe County thot is 2,5 versus ,95 for Clork County,
Clork County currently hos l8 judiciol positions for 1 9 million populotion, We hove
projected l8 judiciol positions in Woshoe County for 700,000 populotion,
In 2006 Clork County hod l8 Fomily Court judges serving .l,900,000 populotion ond
processing 43,730 filings, This represented obout 22,7 filings per 1,000 populotion, There
were 1,902 filings per judge in Clork County ond ,95 judges per 100,000 populotion,
Poge 29 of 356

By comporison, Woshoe County with o projected populotion of 700,000 requiring 18
judiciol positions would be processing 20,155 filings per yeor, This would represenf o
filing rote of 28,8 filings per 1,000 populotion per yeor. Those 18 judges ore forecost to
process 1,12A filings per judge ond there would be 2,6judges per 100,000 populotion,
There is quite o difference between Woshoe County projections ond Clork County
experience, T[re forecost rotio of filings per judiciol position in Woshoe County is olmost
holf of thot currently experienced in Clork County, The rotio of judges per 100,000
populotion is 2,5 times greoter thon currently experienced in Clork County. The 20,-|55
filings forecost when Woshoe County populotion is 700,000 is obout holf of the 43,1 73
filings currently experienced in Clork County for o populotion thot is neorly three times
lorger,
lf the 38 equivolent judiciol positions forecost by the Fomily Court is reolized, this would
require the 36,000 filings the Court hos projected or 51,4 filings per 1,000 populotion -
neorly doubling the current filings rote now experienced in Woshoe County, Further,
the projection developed by the Fomily Court would result in 947 filings odjudicoted per
yeor per equivolent judiciol position ond o rotio of 5,4 Fomily Court judiciol positions per
.l00,000 populotion - five times greoter thon currently experienced in Clork County,
The Spoce Requirements Progrom developed by the Consultont estimoted o
requirement for 72,924 NSF to supporf the l8 equivolent judiciol positions in the Fomily
Court, This is o rotio of 3,674 NSF per equivolent judiciol position, lf the some rotio is
opplied to the 38 judiciol positions, this would indicote the Fomily Court requires .|54,000
NSF, This in turn represents on increose of 8.|,076 NSF for the 20 odditionol equivolent
judiciol positions, Converted oI o 7O"/" efficiency of net-to-gross oreo, this would equote
to on increose of I .|6,000 gross squore feet (GSF),
Cleorly, if it is necessory to reserve odditionol site oreo to occommodote the potentiol
future development of on odditionol I .l6,000 GSF, it would be necessory to reserve on
odditionol ocre of the 2,79 ocre Pioneer site or to initiolly develop on odditionol five
levels in the court tower proposed on the Pioneer site increosing it to 14 levels, This
would represent o building thot is neorly twice os toll os the Mills B, Lone building ond
inconsistent with the City of Reno preferred development density ond height guidelines.
The development olternotives thot tested the feosibility of odding two floors to One
South Sierro were developed exclusively to see if oll Fomily Court requirements could be
occommodoted in on exponded One South Sierro building, thus justifying its verticol
exponsion, This feosibility wos demonstroted in the onolysis presented in Chopter 6,
However, the two odditionol floors thot could be provided will only support the l8 or
possibly 20 Fomily Court judiciol positions, Should the Fomily Court require up to the 38
judiciol positions they forecost, this could not be occommodoted in the exponsion of
One South Sierro ond would require splitting the Fomily Court into two or possibly three
buildings, We believe thot ony olternotive thot would verticolly expond One South
Sierro should not be pursued if it is the objective of Woshoe County to support up to the
38 judiciol positions os forecost by the Fomily Division of the District Court
Poge 30 of 356

Further, to consolidote oll Fomily Court judiciol positions within one secured environment
ond to consolidote it with the Generol Jurisdiction Division of the District Court would
necessitote ollocoting of leost 75% of the Pioneer site ond require o three-phose
develooment scenorio,
Recognizing thot the mojority of the motters heord in the Fomily Court con be
occommodoted in smoll heoring rooms or courtrooms not requiring person in-custody
or jury occommodotions, it is believed thot considerotion for o Fomily Court Division
opprooching 38 equivolent judiciol positions should consider development of on
independent building on o new site, locoted in more suburbon locotion where lond
cost is such thqt surfoce porking con be provided ond o low-rise, lower cost focility
could be occommodoted.
Should the Boord of Commissioners occept the Fomily Court Division's projection of 38
equivolent judiciol officers of community build-out, it would be recommended thot o
site selection study be conducted ond on olternotive site be identified thot could
support the development of the Fomily Court in o phosed monner, The site should be
os close os possible to the centroid of future County populotion ond provide
convenient occess ond occommodote significont surfoce porking, This would
significontly olter requirements for court focilities in the current Courthouse locotion ond
would reduce future requirements to require the provision for only 27 judiciol positions
ond 3.|7,000 NSF of spoce, This, when compored to the cunent resource of fqcilities
thot provide occommodotions for 2l judiciol positions in 220,000 gross squore feet of
spoce suggests thot odditionol construction in on order of mognitude of 80,000 gross
squqre feet would be required,
This would represent o rother modest new construction option, preferobly developed
odjocent to the Historic Courthouse or possibly odjocent to the Historic Courthouse on
the footprint now occupied by the .|965 Addition. Under this olternotive, the .1965
Addition would be vocoted ond then reploced with o seven-leveltower with eoch floor
on Levels 3 through 7 providing three Generol Jurisdiction courtrooms on o floor plote of
.l5,000 gross squore feet, The l5 odditionol courts would complement the three existing
courts in the Historic Courthouse ond orovide o totol of 18 courts for the Generol
Jurisdiction Division of the District Courts,
Obviously, o significontly different recommended Moster Plon would result if the Fomily
Court Division recommendotion for providing 38 equivolent judiciol positions is the
preferred option os opposed to the 18 equivolent positions projected by the
Consultont,,
Poge 31 of356

D. Reno Justice Courl Projeclion
A similor process to thot employed for the projection of District Court judiciol positions
wos employed for the Reno Justice Court, However, the .|999 Study only provided doto
from .|989, lt wos updoted to reflect the trend to yeor 2006. This onolysis utilizes doto
provided in the 1999 Study for yeors 1985 to 1999 ond doto provided by Woshoe
County ond the District & Justice Courts for 2000 to 2006 os presented in Exhibit
2,1,
The populotion of Reno Township hos voried historicolly between 65% ond 68% of the
Woshoe County populotion, We elected to utilize o rotio of 65"/" for future populotion
projections, This resulis in the current Reno Township populotion of 25.l,000 increosing to
455,000 ot community build-out in 2050,
In .l989 there were 36,095 Justice Court filings, In 2006 it wos estimoted there were
65,870 filings, The trend represents on increose of 2.5"/" to 4o/o pet yeor bosed upon the
20-yeor overoge rote of growth ond the six-yeor qveroge rote of growth respectively,
Totol filings per thousond populotion were 223 in 1989, This increqsed to 262 Justice
Court filings per thousond township populotion in 2006. This ogoin represents o rote of
growth of 1 ,37"/" per yeor over the post six yeors ond o longer term, 1 7-yeor growth rote
of ,45"/" per yeor, We hove elected to use the overoge of these two rotes resulting in o
l,l% onnuol rote of increose of filing rote per thousqnd populotion os we project inio
the future, This would result in 422 filings per thousond populotion in the yeor 2050,
The number of filings per Justice Court judiciol position ronged between .l0,000 ond
15,000 over the post I 7 yeors, lt is currently ot 13,17 4 Justice Court filings per judiciol
position, This reflects on upword trend of ,53% in eoch of the lost l7 yeors ond o lorger
increose overoging 1.43o/" in the lost six yeors, We hove elected to utilize o rote of
increose in filings per judiciol position much towords the lower end of the scole, oL76"/"
per yeor, which would result in o forecost of .|8,358 filings per judiciol position 43 yeors in
the future,
Continuing further, this onolysis then indicotes thot the current five Justice Court judiciol
positions would increose to 9.8 positions in ihe yeor 2050. However, Justice Court
judiciol positions ore ollocoted by the Legisloture of one per 50,000 populotion or
increment thereof. A forecost populotion of 455,000 would thus justify 9,1 judiciol
positions or l0 positions when rounded up, We hove developed o moster plon oround
providing for ten judiciol positions in the Justice Couri of populotion build-out, All of this
doto is disployed on Exhibit 2-2.
Poge 32 of 356

E. Court Support Stoff Requiremenls
Projections of stoff levels necessory to support forecost number of judiciol positions ore
developed in Exhibil 2-3, First, ofter summorizing the projection of judiciol positions in
the Exhibits 2-l ond 2-2, the relotionship of stoff per judiciol position, stoff per thousond
county populotion (or in the cose of the Justice Court, stoff per thousond township
populotion) wos developed. Next the onolysis took into occount the historicol number
of stoff oositions ond the onnuol rotes of increose,
For the District Court, totol stoff levels in l9B5 were 57 positions, which hove increosed to
o current 166 positions, The relotionship of stoff per judiciol position increosed from five
in I 985 to nine stoff per judiciol position for the District Court in 2OO7 .
Preliminory projections were then reviewed with District Court stoff ond the District Court
did on independent projection by orgonizotionol subunit for monogement, operotions,
services, progroms, ond judiciol support of the number of stoff positions necessory to
support the forecost number of judiciol positions. This resulted in o projection of 286
District Court stoff in the yeor 2050 to support 35 judiciol positions, This would be o rote
of 8.48 stoff positions per judiciol officer. This reflects o stobilizotion of the current stoff
per judiciol officer rotio, Thus this projection, os developed by ihe District Court stoff,
moy be somewhot conservotive os it tqkes into occount o relionce on future
economies to scole ond outomotion to control stoff levels of rotios per judiciol position
thot ore lower thon cunentlv found,
The rotio of District Court stoff per ten thousond populotion served increoses from 2,54 in
.1985 to 4,.|8 currently ond is forecost to be stoble of 4,08 District Court stoff per
thousond county populotion thot ore supported in the yeor 2050,
For the Justice Court, Exhibit 2-3 provides o similor onolysis ond results in o forecost for
opproximotely 98 stoff positions within the Justice Court to support ten judiciol officers in
2050, This would be ot o rotio of opproximotely l0 stoff per judiciol position, which is
consistent with the current rotio of .l0,4, which, in turn, reflects o significont increose
from the eorlier rotio of five to seven stoff per judiciol position for the Justice Court, We
believe there moy be o conservotive estimote of stoff level requirements in the Justice
Court included in the dotobose oround which spoce requirements hove been forecost,
Exhibit 2-3 presents o summory of the importont historicol, current, ond projected doto
for county ond township populotion, number of judiciol positions, number of stoff, rqtios
of stoff per judiciol position, filings per thousond populotion, ond rotes of increose both
historicol ond os used to develop the future projections,
Poge 33 of 356

F. Projection Dqlq Relolionships
Exhibits 24 through 2L plot the doto included in the stotisticol tobles found in
Exhibits 2-1,2-2, ond 2-3,
A brief explonotion of the implicotions disployed in these exhibits follows:
. Exhibit 2-A presents the District Court filings from .1985 through 2006 ond the
projections developed through community build-out in 2050, The historicol doto
cleorly indicotes thot while Fomily Court filings increosed, Generol Jurisdiction
Court filings decreosed due to the tronsfer of filings from Generol Jurisdiction to
Fomily Jurisdiction, The totql filings hove increosed over the post 20 yeors of o
rote thot is significontly less thon the rote of growth of populotion. The forecost
shows o porollel growth rote between totol District Court filings ond populotion
throughout the plonning timefrome,
. Exhibit 2-B documents the historicol Generol Jurisdiction filings thot hove
decreosed from .l985 to the cunent level in 2OO7, while the number of judiciol
positions remoined relotively stoble, Projected into the future, the relotionship
between Generol Jurisdiction filings ond judiciol positions is forecost to remoin
constont,
. Exhibit 2-C reflects the significont increoses in the Fomily Division filings of the 2nd
District Court over the post 20 yeors, lt olso depicts o porollel increose in judiciol
positions. As with the Generol Jurisdiction. it is forecost thot Fomily Court filings
will increqse of the some rote os the Fomily Court judiciol positions over the
plonning timefrome.
. Exhibit 2-D reflects the sum of oll District Court filings projected on the some scole
os historicol ond projected judiciol positions, From .|985 through 2OO7, filings
increosed of o slightly slower rote of growth thon the number of judiciol positions.
This indicotes thot fewer District Court filings ore being processed every yeor per
judiciol position currently thon in the post. We forecost the rotio of filings per
judiciol position will remoin relotively constont for future plonning timefromes,
'
Exhibit 2-E trocks the District Court filings per 1,000 populotion. Reflecting the
trqnsfer of filings from the Generol Jurisdiction to the Fomily Jurisdiction, there is o
substontiol decreose in Generol Jurisdiction filing per 1,000 populotion thot neorly
corresponds with the ropid increose of Fomily Court filings per 1,000 populotion.
The totol, os shown on the top line of Exhibit 2E, shows o continuing decreose in
totol District Court filings per 1,000 populotion from 65/.l,000 in .|985 to the current
level of 4ll.|,000, The future projections reflect o continuotion of opproximotely
43 filings per 1,000 populotion throughout the plonning timefrome.
. Exhibit 2-F trocks the Reno Justice Court filing rote per'1,000 populotion, While
there hos been significont voriotions in this rote during the post 20 yeors of the
trend line cleorly shows o continuing increose in filings per .l,000 populotion os is
Poge 34 of 356

forecost from the current level of 265 to o future projected 422 filings per 1,000
populotion in the yeor 2050, This is o continuotion of the trend for the post
decode ond reflects increosed low enforcement presence ond stricter filing
policy, On the some grophicol scole, Exhibit 2-F trocks the Justice Court totol
filings, which reflect o foirly consistent increose of 3,6"/" per yeor,
Exhibit 2-G trocks the Reno Justice Court filings ond judiciol positions, which ore
neorly porollel for the post 15 yeors, The growth rote of Justice Court totol filings
is slightly greoter thon the historicol increose in the number of judiciol positions
gronted by the Legisloture, The groph depicts the trend thot Justice Court filings
will increose foster thon the number of judiciol positions outhorized by the
Legisloture, implying thot the Justice Court must identify mechonisms to be oble
to process on increosing number of coses per judiciol position per yeor, The
number of filings per yeor is currently opproximotely .|3,500 filings per judiciol
position per yeor, By 2050, this is forecost to increose to .|8,000 filings processed
per judiciol position per yeor, This might be o somewhot oggressive "producfivity
increose" curve but, the number of judiciol positions ollocoted to the Justice
Court ore reguloted by township populotion by the Legisloture,
Exhibit 2-H plots totol District Court stoff, the rotio of totol District Court stoff to
populotion, ond the rotio of totol District Court stoff to judiciol positions, All three
of these indices hove increosed relotively proporfionol over the post 20 yeors,
The projection developed in this study forecost the rotio of stoff per judiciol
position for supporl stoff will remoin relotively stoble over the next mony yeors ot
between eight ond nine stoff per judiciol position,
The totol District Court stoff will increose in relotive proportion to court filings ond
judiciol positions from o current totol stoff level of 163 positions to o projected 286
positions in 2050, This projection then results in o rother consistent stoble
projection of obout 4.08 stoff per 10,000 populotion for the District Court.
Exhibit 2-l projects historicol ond projected totol District Court stoff, which hos
increosed from 65 positions in .l985 to the current .l63 positions, The forecost in
2050 is for 286 positions, During the some timefrome, the totol District Court filings
per stoff decreosed from 252 in .|985 to o current level of 99 District Court filings
per stoff, We forecost the rotio of filings per stoff member in the future will
increose to .|05,
Exhibit 2-J documents the Reno Justice Court stoff ond projects the number of
stoff, rotios of stoff to populotion, ond rotio of stoff to Reno Justice Court judiciol
positions, As seen in previous grophs, historicol trends oll depict o historicol
increose in the totol stoff, o neorly porollel increose in the rotio of stoff per judiciol
position, ond stobility in the rotio of stoff per .|0,000 Reno Township populotion,
Cunently there ore is opproximotely .|0,2 stqff per judiciol position, Pour
projection continues this trend into the future, With the number of judiciol
positions increosing proportionote to populotion, the rotio of stoff per .|0,000
Reno Township populotion will remoin stoble of obout 2,.l in future plonning
Poge 35 of 356

yeors, The totol Reno Justice Court stoff levels thot ore now of 5l stoff ore
forecost to increose to 98 stoff in the veor 2050,
Exhibit 2-K reflecls Justice Court stoff ond filings per stoff position, The filings per
stoff hqve remoined relotively constont of oround 1,400 for the post two
decodes, During this timefrome totol stoff hos increosed relotively in proportion
to populotion, We project in the future the increose in filings per stoff ond totol
stoff will be proportionote ond by the yeor 2O5O, there will be o requirement for o
totol stoff of 98 positions, which will be processing on qverqge of .l,968 filings per
stoff position,
Exhibit 2-L reflects the totol Justice ond District Court reouirements for stoff ond
the rotio of totol stoff per .l0,000 County populotion (recognizing thot for the
Justice Court it is reolly reloted to Township populotion os opposed to totol
County populotion but the Township populotion is consistently 657o of Counfy
populotion) ond the totol stoff per judiciol positions,
Relotively porollel growth hos been incurred over the post 20 yeors ond,
projected into the future we find totol stoff should increose of obout the some
rotio os the populotion of the County it serves, This results in q totol stoff per
10,000 County populotion thot is stoble in 2007 through future plonning yeors ot
obout 5.48 stoff per 10,000 populotion. This results in the totol stoff per judiciol
position remoining relotively stoble ot 8.48 stoff per judiciol position for oll future
plonning yeors,
Poge 36 of 356

EXHIBIT 2.I
DISTRICT COURT CASETOAD DISIRIBUTION
1985 - 2050
Jj€nile
UFSA
lPo
Dorngtic
Guddimgip
Poge 37 of 356

EXHIBIT 2-I CONT.
DISTRICT COURT CASETOAD DISTRIBI'TION
r 985 - 2050 - CONTTNUED
ASO(F Gor'lh l?ote Prq€d€d
2000 200'l 2002 2oo3 2n4 2m5 2@6 85-06 95.06 02 06 85-06 02 06 6 2010 2015 2020 2030 2440 2050
t3,316 I A_58 15.567 l6_594 15.804 | 6.000 16.004 1A,4U2 14,995 I 5.994 0.519 0.699 I.!5q I 7,630 r8,920 20,210 23,m5 262fi 30.1
2,345 3,046 3,214 3,033 3.O59 3.025 3.r 50 2,742 2,954 3,096 1.489 .0.509
3,698
6,043
9.0
3,41C
6,456
9.0
3,610
6,824
9.0
4,397
7,4fi
9.0
487
7.146
9.0
4.O24
9,0
3.956
7.1 06
10.5
5,{O8
8.1 50
9.7
3,167
6.721
9.3
4,016
7,112
9
-4.259
-2.46'l
0.239
2.319
t.g2i
3.939
1.4:|1
1.120t
7,7fi
I l.l
8,360 8.930
il.9
l0,l 65
l3.t
't
1,590
t5.0
r 3,300
17,2
671
I 7.83
717
14.44
758
t8.89
826
't9.95
794
18.63
784
18.23
677
18.2r
833
28.93
721
19.7
't9
-2.t
-5.009 -0.919
0.3lor
0.109 | 9.0c 19.00 t9.00
775
!g.tr
715
l9
1.425 t52 2.O34 2.080 r,889 2,1 01 2,147 1,to2 1,491 2,050 5'799 1.369
99t t.460 1.675 t,&7 1,558 1,613 r,504 1.la4 t.599 2.529
1.546 1., 1.773 t.7n t,875 t,890 |,268 I,690 1,810 5.79i 2.341
2.903 3.1 l9 2.934 2.867 2,755 2,922 3.1 73 2,941 LOn .2.35i
364 397 496 5t7 L7A 546 493 2& 436 506 5.569 .0.1 59
7,273
3.0
8,126
3.0
8.743 9,1 64
4.0
8.d
4.
4.947
4.0
8,898
4.0
6,246
1.9
8,274
2.O
8,882
3,8
6.Mn
5.6i
o.443
7.46n
Ld59 9,840 10.560 I 1.280 t2,8{O 14,64 | 6,80C
4.5 5.75 5.75 5.75 3.31 3.39 5,1 6.619 13.219
l,l l9
2t.45
6.5
1,250
23.21
6.5
r,345
24,20
8.5
r.078
24,60
9.75
888
22.57
9.75
918
23.12
9,75
913
?2.4O
5
l9
1.tu
20'37
8.9
t.u2a
23.5
9,32n
-2.639
3.67i
t0.679
.9.24i
-1.47a
1.441
0.o29
0.129
t0.7
q20
?4.@
n.5
920
24.OO
920
24.O4
14.0
q20
24.U
15.9
9m
24.00
r8.3
920
24.W
t3.316
7.66i
14,582
3.An
15,567
3.r89
16,594
3.09q
15,804
2.g94t
16,0@
0.869
r6004
0.859
l4-3ftr I 4.995 I 5.994 0.519
-5.659
o.&1
-28.O3?
't.45i
r.259
't7.630
1.27.1
1a,qm
1.461
20.210
t.369
23,00€
1.38?
26.230
't.40?
30,1 00
l./'89
339.tr[
339
JV,Zd
t 5.5
350.130
350
4t.oo
| 5.5
941
36r.30c
361
4.r.w
r 5.5
372.M
372
44.OO
94
s83,600
384
41.2O
18.8
386.906
381
4t.35
t8.8
390.?r2
390
4l.ul
20.3
790
/|8.88
15,0
44.O1
16.7
w2
378,894
379
42.24
ta.2
AA8
2,68n
-2,1 lor
) 739
-,169
1.94?
1.949
.t.224
6.919(
.5Alq
1.349
0.1l9
1.289
o.ai9
AI
410
43.00
2r.8
aoa
44
4&
/t{t,w
23.0
470
4it.w
24.2
436
5!
535
4ir.w
27.1
a
610
4O.LU
30.9
7@
4J,L|.J
35.4
Poge 38 of 356

EXHIBIT 2.2
JUSTICE COURT CASETOAD DISIRIBUTION
| 985 - 2050
R€quet id ftotenm order
% d lold C@lood
Totol CMI Filhg6
% ct lofd C@lood
Poge 39 of 356

EXHIBIT 2.2 CONT.
JUSTICE COURT CASETOAD DISIRIBUTION
r 985 - 2050 - CONTTNUED
A\€rocF Grwlh Rote Rd€led
2001 2W) 2m3 2004 2m5 2W 89.06 9to6 00.06 89-06 G06 06-50 20lo 2015 2U20 2030 2040 2050
53,59r 67,&41 74,O38 67,050 67,374 65.87C fi,479 55,883 63,9t 7 3.@9 d.l3q 2.479 72.372 82. l 83 c2,89r r 18.033 1fi,229 t92,442
7.21O 6.6E6 6.497 5.9m 6.65r 6.917 6,72',1 6.805 6.675 -0.309r 0.1 39r #NUM!
9 8.789 8.804 9.8791 10.509 14.071 l2. tE9 10.449(
2.9@ 3.742 3.542 t57 2.62 241 3.344 l.6l -a.a|q *NI.JMI
I 4.939 t3.t r3.289 20.719.
7,EEO i,955 E,274 ?,w I l,l 52 10,929 6,566 7,880 8,965 8.739 6.34? #NUMI
40,459{ 38.869 39.899 43.789 55.29q 64.769 37.&2.X 42,4n 45.879(
5 3.135 6.741 7.',t39 7.O *NUi
16.5E9 40.stii 36.439
570 t75 262 rt50 #NI,JMI *NUMI
|,639{ z, lza 2.5tt l.4l
19,483 20,471 20,748 20,56r 20,t71 r 6.875 16,829 r8,576 t9,u2 2.391 t.5tt #Nt,MI
36.359( 30. I 79 25.@i 30.679 29.C401 25.62i 33.999 33.249 30.579{
26,apa 40,682 46,793 40,589 40,552 42,O78 26.929 30,5@ 31,7@ 5.289 8.t 4q #NUMI
50.r 99( 59.979 63.20S 60.549 60,19? 63.889 5l,949 54.581 58. 9(
3.74?. 26.591 9.139 .9.441 o,484 -2.231 3.789 4.689 4.131
5.399( 5.079 L359 .0.909 r,90* 2.t59 0.329 t.519(
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.33 4.67 5.m 5.3 5.7 6.1 7.0 7.9 9.1
u,o39 45,(n0 46,mC 46,888 t7.462 w,2u 4i,333 47,3U d6,665
45.0 46,4 46.0 46.0 50.0 5t.0 &.75 58.0 62.3 71.7 82.6 95.7
9.0
l,t9l
9.2
|,475 1,610
9.2
1,458
r0.0
1,347
10.2
r,292 r,330 2,tw 1.059
't0.1
1,346
l0.l
t.416
to.2
t,491
t0.3
|,647
to.4
r,820
10.5
2,0r0
't0,718 r3,568 I 4,808 13,410 | 3,475 I 3,1 74 I 1,574 I r,897 13,192 0.539 4,13* o.78? I 3,584 l4.l l3 14,62 15,809 17,@2 r8,358
243.38 301.52 32t.90 286.00 28t.53 262.41 245.37 252.4A 282.79 0.959 r.37? l.l 69 27't.& 287.35 304.06 s39.42 378.E9 42L96
5.33 5.82 6.34 7.47 8.82 10.t8
350-t 5f 961,@ 37 361 2,379. 1.349 4lo,qq 4{O,q 47I
3.297l
220,193
62.9*
3. t89
225,W
6234
3.@9
230,000
6t.89
2.994
234,4#
6l.t
9,3t2 2,63i 2.7241 t.36q
1.274
266.5m
L{61
286,0@
L369(
305,5(n
1.389
347,7fi
l.doq
3 ,500
L489
455,00C
3.t]llol 2.187. 2.t)q,
q 6r.99( g.Jt
oc.u oc,u ob.ua oi.u oc.q 09,q,
1.933 2.OAq 4.89n
r.549( 1.464 1.361 r.389 1.409( t.489
243.4 301.t 321 286.( 281.t 262.1 245.4 252.4 282.8 0,959 t37A 1.o99 271 287./ 304.1 339.r 378.C 422.1
5.U 5.O 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.33 4.67 5.@ 3,O59 0.oo9( t.549 6.t 9.1
| 0,71 € r 3.56t r 4.801 | 3.4r ( 13.471 l3. r 7r t1,574 I 1,897 t 3.1 92 0,539t 4.t39 o.769 13.584 t3 14.62 | 5.803 7.O32 r 8.358
Poge 40 of 356

EXHIBIT 2-3
COURT STAFF SUMMARY
| 985 - 2050
Totol - District Court Court Floor Stofl
Rqtio JLdiciol Aeo Stofi/Judiciol Podlion
Totol - Justice Court Stoff & Judiciol
Cdri SeMces inc, Pre-triol
4J tDisfticf C_ourt Totol Filings _
42lFomilv Court Adm. Slotf &TPo
Totol Stoff for oll Courls to Accomrnodote
Totol Stofi/l 0,000 Cdnty Populqtion
17,0 r l7.o
3.0i 3.0 1 3,0
21 .O ; 24.O
17,0 18.0
ao,ot S.l,?|. ,i4.9
3,33 i 3.30 3,43
0,28 ; O.29 0.31
Poge41 of356
909 14,O42 1 3.255 14,816
4.14 4.91
l6r ,57l] 1 65 169,47',|
3.35 3.66
5.37 i 5,65
2,O i
28.O
1,5
tg-5_l
2.O

EXHIBIT 2-3 - CONT.
COURT STAFF SUMMARY
| 985 - 2050 - CONTTNUED
1957 I 998 1999 2000 2001 2c,02 : 20c3 20c4 2005 20c,6 2QO7 201 0 201 5 2c20 2030 2c40 2050
9.0 9.0 9,0 9,0 9,0 9,O 9,0 9,0 9.0 I O,5 10,0 il.1 I 1,5 il,9 I3.r I5,0 17.2
7.O 7.O 6,5 6,5 6,5 6,5 8,5 9.8 9.8 9,8 Q.7 il,5 12.3 14.0 15,9 18,3
t6,0 r 6,0 I5.5 t5,5 t 5,5 15.5 r 7.5 t8,8 1/.8 20,0 20.0 2l .8 23,O 24.2 27.1 30.9 35.4
22.O 22.O 22.O 22.O 22.O 22.O 24.O 24.O 24.O 24.O 24.O 30,6 32,4 34.2 38.9 45.2 52,8
-':3g n I -1e.n $t5 37-! t/E;S ,{|;o 424 4l.a 44JU 44 66fr 76.I rf(.: S8.?
t.38 L38 1.42 142 1.42 |.42 L37 |.28 1,35 |.20 1.20 1,40 l 4l 1.42 |.44 1 .47 't.49
4,0 4.O 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,3 6.2 7.2 8,4 9,8
29.5 30,0 3t,0 40,0 40,0 41,0 4t,0 41,0 45,0 46.O 47.O 51,0 54.0 6t.0 69,0 79.O 88.0
33.5 34,S 36s t*5.0 ?|&6.0 40.u :, iit?.t 50s 5lIl 52.U 56.3i iB$is b7 76 a7-4 c78.
74 7.5 6.2 8,0 8.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 9,0 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2
3,0 3,0 3.0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 6,0 6.0 6,0 6,0 o.u
2.O 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,5 3.5 2.O 2.O 3,0 3,0 4.4 4.O 4.0 4,0
16,0 I6,0 r6,0 17,0 19,0 25.O 25,0 26.O 26.O 28,0 28.O 29.O 30,0 30.0 3r.0 32,0 33,0
2.O 2.Q 2.O 2.O 2.O 2.O 2.O 2,O 2.O 2,O 2.O 2.O 2.O 4,0 3,0 4,0 4.O
2B.O 28.O 28.O 3r.0 32.O 36.O 3t.o 38.0 39.0 46.O 46.O 20.o 22.O 24.O 260 28.O 32.O
2.O 2.O 4.O 4.O 4.O 4.0 4.O 4.O 5.0 5,0 8,0 10,0 t2.o 14,0 r5.o 16.O
19,0 19.0 20,0 20,0 2Q.O 22.O 23.O 23.O 26.O 27.A 14,0 i6,0 r 8,0 20.o 23.O 27.O 3t,o
2.O 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 2.O 2,O 2.O 2.O 4.Q 4.0 4.O 4.O
3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.O 4,0 40 5,0 5.0 5.0
5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 17,0 17,0 17,0
82.9
5,13
0,39
84.S
5,25
0.39
€.u
5.48
0,39
Y2"V
5.94
0,38
uLu
6.26
0,38
rggs
7,03
0,41
uI
6,34
0.41
'*:261*,
6.75
o.44
t3s.s
7.33
n45
L3*t
6.95
o4
20.o 22.O
t5.o
24.O
1?8t)
28.O
t39.O
32,O
ls&.u
36.0
308.700 312 300 3 r4.882 339.000 350. I 50 361,300 372.450 383,600 386,906 390,21 400.o00 4 r 0.000 440.000 470.000 535.000 6r 0.000 700.000
15,474 I a.a19 12,270 | 3.316 14,582 15.567 I 6,594 t5.804 16.000 r 6,004 16,41 /,OJU | 6,VZU 20.21o 23.OO5 26.230 30, I 00
5 5 5 6
2) ca 25 23 26 32 36
l2 l3 l4 l6 21 23 25
0
t04
0
l06
0
l07
0
114
0
't
19
0
t3l
0
135
0
t5l
0
155
0
163
38
166
41
t77
44
l9l
44
2r]6
52
?30
60
257
67
286
3.37 3,39 3,40 3.36 3,40 3,63 3.62 3.92 3.99 4,t8 4,3 r 4.39 4 .30 4.22 4,08
149 136 lt5 117 t2 il9 123 t05 104 98 99 to0 99 98 t00 l02 t05
6,50 6.63 6,90 7.35 7.68 8,45 7.71 L03 8.68 8, t5 8.30 8.09 8.32 8.53 8.49 8,33 LO7
206,537 210.21 213.364 2I 3.66( 220.19i 225.OOC 230.000 234,438 239,31 251 ,O2Q 266,000 266.5c0 286,000 305,500 347,750 s96.500 455,000
44,691 43.322 50,261 51,657 53.59r 67,941 74,038 67,050 67 374 65,870 7' nnn 72.372 82.1 83 92.491 I I 8.033 150.229 192.442
ett J4;U ;19$ 49.u ;5:{ - rtr6.0 46S. . oz,u cn ta,z 87,!l q7.a
1.62 1,62 L69 2.11 2.O4 2.O4 2.OO 1.96 2.O9 2.03 1.95 2.11 2.O9 2.20 2.19 2.2O 2.15
L334 1.274 1.396 L 148 Lt9 1.475 l.6t 0 1,458 1,34 1.292 r,385 1,285 1,375 r.382 |.545 I 719 1.968
8.4
137.5
4.45
8,5
140,0
4.48
7.2
I43.0
4.54
9,0
159.0
4.69
9,0
164.0
4.68
9.2
177.O
4gfl
9.2
't8'l
.o
4.46
9.2
196,5
5.l2
10.0
244.5
5.29
10.2
214,O
5.48
10,4
218,O
10,6
232.9
5,68
10,4
251 .2
5.7t
10,8
273.5
5.82
t 0,6
306. t
5.72
10,4
344.6
5.65
10,0
383,6
5.48
6.88 7.OO 6.98 7.76 8.00 8.63 8,04 8.27 8,9 8.56 8.72 8,58 8,73 9,00 8,93 8.78 8.48
Poge 42 of 356

700.000
600,000
500.000
z
9
F
54oo,ooo
)a
o c
DISTRICT COURT FILINGS AND POPUTATION
300,000
200.000
r 985 - 2050
'w{ |
@
-Pop
-Totol
-Lineor
85_06
Filings 85-06
(Totot Fitings 85-06)
-Generol
-Generol
Jurisdiclion Filings
Filings
---*--. Lineor (Generol Fllings)
-Fomily
-
-Lineor
13,300
Court Fjlings
Fomily Filings
(Fomily Filings)
Exhibit 2-A presents the District Court filings from .l985 through 2006 ond the projections
developed through community'build-out in 2050, The historicol doto cleorly indicotes
thot while Fomily Court filings increosed, Generol Jurisdiction Court filings decreosed
due to the tronsfer of filings from Generol Jurisdiction to Fomily Jurisdiction, The totol
filings hove increosed over the post 20 yeors of o rote thot is significontly less thon the
rote of growth of populotion, The forecost shows o porollel growth rote between totol
District Court filings ond populotion throughout the plonning timefrome,
Poge 43 of 356
I
20,000
=I
r
r 5,000
r 0,000
5,000
0

EXHIBIT 28
DISTRICT COURT GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION
FIUNES & JUDICIAT POSITIONS
20,000
r 8,000
I 6,000
r 4.000
o '''"""
z
J
j 'o.ooo
e,
U
z
lr' 8,000
6.000
-Generol
_)_:_ ___i___
YEARS
Filings
-Judiciol
Positions
Exhibit 2-B documents the historicol Generol Jurisdiction filings thot hove decreosed
from 1985 to the current level in 2OO7, while the number of judiciol positions remqined
relotively stoble, Projected into the future, the relotionship between Generol
Jurisdiction filings ond judiciol positions is forecost to remoin constont,
Poge 44 of 356
t
t
I
i
I
r8.0
t6.0
r 4.0
o
'Itn e
'-- r Ir
ro.o O Jgo
8,0 0 Da
6,0
4.0
2.0
0.0

EXHIBIT 2C
r 8.000
r 6,000
I 4.000
r 2.000
o
p ro.ooo
=r
=
= f,
DISTRICT COURT FAMILY DIVISION
FITINGS & JUDICIAT POSITIONS
8,000
6,000
1i
1 i_
!i
1:
il
!**-----L*ti
ii il
ti
| ." *-i
ooo@
NN
YEARS
-FomilyFilings -JudiciolPositlons
I
i
I
.......t.-...............-*
Exhibit 2-C reflects the significont increoses in the Fomily Division filings of the 2nd District
Courf over the post 20 yeors, lt olso depicts o porollel increose in judiciol positions, As
with the Generol Jurisdiction, it is forecost thot Fomily Court filings will increose of the
some rote os the Fomily Court judiciol positions over the plonning timefrome,
Poge 45 of 356
t 4.0
12.O q e,
U
cl
ru,u oJ
o
80 6 Dt
6.0

EXHIBIT 2D
DISTRICT COURT TOTAL
FILINGS & JUDICIAT POSITIONS
35,000
30.000
25,000
$ zo,ooo
z
J
r
J
6 rs,ooo
i1
l1
t1
f,,,,-----r
38
I
l
1
I
l
t:;l t
ii'lll
i i :__l i j_
3833eR
YEARS
Filings
-Totol -Judiciol
Officers
tol Filings;
^^ ^
9o'Ioo
'r ruu
Exhibit 2-D reflects the sum of oll District Court filings projected on the some scole os
historicql ond projected judiciol positions. From .l985 through 2007 , filings increosed ot o
slightly slower rote of growth thon the number of judiciol positions, This indicotes thot
fewer District Courf filings ore being processed every yeor per judiciol position currently
thon in the post, We forecost the rotio of filings per judiciol position will remoin relotively
constont for future plonning timefromes.
Poge 46 of 356
25.O oe,
r
I
zo.o $g9
rs.o 3 a
10,0

z 50.0
o
J
-d
o 40.0
Aoo(t-
u:t 2n n
o """
=
J
5 20.0
F
10.0
EXHIBIT 2E
DISTRICT COURT FILING
RATES / I,OOO POPULATION
-Totot
YEARS
Fitings/1,000 Pop sGenerot Fitings/1,000 Pop ***Fomity Filings/t,000 Pop
T6lol FilingC/l,000 Pop 43
Exhibit 2-E trocks the District Court filings per 1,000 populotion, Reflecting the tronsfer of
filings from the Generol Jurisdiction to the Fomily Jurisdiction, there is o substontiol
decreose in Generol Jurisdiction filing per 1,000 populotion thot neorly corresponds with
the ropid increose of Fomily Court filings per 1,000 populotion, The totol, os shown on
the top line of Exhibit 2E, shows o continuing decreose in totol District Court filings per
.l,000 populotion from 65/.|,000 in .l985 to the current level of 4ll.|,000. The future
projections reflect o continuotion of opproximotely 43 filings per 1,000 populotion
throughout the plonning timefrome,
Poge 47 of 356

EXHIBIT 2F
RENO JUSTICE COURT FILING
RATES / I,OOO POPULATIONS
500,000
450.000
6 400,000
z
J
tr ^-^ ^^^
, JCU,UUU
s
o F
dd 300,000
z
I
? zso,ooo
I
=4
o4 200,000
g
-g,
! rso.ooo
o
= r00,000
U
e,
50,000
i " "-"; ".......i.*...
O@O@
-Justrce
{
'*j I
.^;;r'
YEARS
Court Totol Filings ."- Reno Township Populotion
'{;=i
TownsFip
:H[nssl-_ ;2,
400.0
f 350.0
t
H
i1e2*W ; rso.o
',d{-
E
| ......-.......:
lltJ
11ir
=
't00.0
Exhibit 2-F trocks the Reno Justice Court filing rote per 1,000 populotion, While there hos
been significont voriotions in this rote during the post 20 yeors of the trend line cleorly
shows o continuing increose in filings per 1,000 populotion os is forecost from the current
level of 2651o o future projected 422filings per '1,000 populotion in the yeor 2050, This is
o continuotion of the trend for the post decode ond reflects increosed low
enforcement presence ond stricter filing policy. On the some grophicolscqle, Exhibit 2-
F trocks the Justice Court totol filings, which reflect o foirly consistent increose of 3,6o/"
per yeor,
Poge 48 of 356
-
Filings per 1 ,000 Pop
:
i
i
t.
'
I

200,000
r 80,000
r 60,000
I 40,000
I 20,000
u,
o
z
E roo,ooo
s
o* 8o.ooo
EXHIBIT 2G
RENO JUSTICE COURT
FILINGS & JUDICIAT POSITIONS
l
I
i
i
1
oo
FN
YEARS
*Jusice Court Totol Filinos
i
t
t
I
t
I
I
-Totol
Judiciol Posilions
Exhibit 2-G trocks the Reno Justice Court filings ond judiciol positions, which ore neqrly
porollel for the post l5 yeors, The growth rote of Justice Court totol filings is slightly
greoter thon the historicol increose in the number of judiciol positions gronted by the
Legisloture, The groph depicts the trend thot Justice Court filings will increose foster
thon the number of judiciol positions outhorized by the Legisloture, implying thot the
Justice Court must identify mechonisms to be oble to process on increosing number of
coses per judiciol position per yeor, The number of filings per yeor is currently
opproximotely 13,500 filings per judiciol position per yeor, By 2050, this is forecost to
increose to '|8,000 filings processed per judiciol position per yeor, This might be o
somewhot oggressive "productivity increose" curve but, the number of judiciol positions
ollocoted to the Justice Court ore reguloted by township populotion by the Legisloture,
Poge 49 of 356
8.0
a
z
I
=t)
ao O L
g
o
=-
4.O
2.O

DISTRICT COURT
STAFF & RATIOS TO POPUTATION & JUDICIAL POSITIONS
400 **.-l
;
i_ i ___
aoo
@GG
-Totot
Districl court siofi
i
I
*i*-*^-o
-.Totot
YEARS
Disfict court stoff/I0,000 Pop
oo
os
.- stoff/Judiciol Positon
Exhibit 2-H plots totol District Court stoff, the rotio of totol District Court stoff to
populotion, ond the rotio of totol District Court stoff to judiciol positions, All three of
these indices hove increosed relotively proportionql over the post 20 yeors, The
projection developed in this study forecost the rqtio of stoff per judiciol position for
support stoff will remoin relotively stoble over the next mony yeqrs of between eight
ond nine stoff per judiciol position.
Poge 50 of 356
ln o
z.
9
=6
5.0 O
GJ
2.O
t.0
o
6
=
6

EXHIBIT 2I
DISTRICT COURT
STAFF & FITINGS / STAFF POSITION
-Totol
YEARS
Disirict Court Stofi
-Filings/Stoff
Totol DiStdcf
Exhibit 2-l projects historicol ond projected totol District Court stoff, which hos increosed
from 65 positions in .|985 to the current 163 positions. The forecost in 2050 is for 286
positions. During the some timefrome, the totol District Court filings per stoff decreosed
from 252 in .|985 to o current level of 99 District Court filings per stoff, We forecost the
rotio of filings per stoff member in the future will increose to .|05,
Poge 51 of356

RENO JUSTICE COURT
STAFF & RATIOS TO POPUTATION & JUDICIAL POSITION
tuo l-**T
2s l-
t
I
I
i
t
t
I
-u f""
-stoff/t0,000
YEARS
Reno Township Pop
: 1---*4
Exhibit 2-J documents the Reno Justice Court stoff ond projects the number of stoff,
rotios of stqff to populotion, qnd rotio of stoff to Reno Justice Court judiciol positions. As
seen in previous grophs, historicol trends oll depict o historicol increose in the totol stqff,
o neorly porollel increose in the rotio of stoff per judiciol position, ond stobility in the
rotio of stoff per .l0,000 Reno Township populotion,
Poge 52 of 356
15.00
z
o
3 Dr
oA
'r0.00
5
9
o
=
5.00
B L
s>

EXHIBIT 2K
RENO JUSTICE COURT
STAFF & FITINGS / STAFF POSITION
l,soo 1---- -:-
I
|.OUU i--
I
t
$ r,ooo
o zJ
E 8oo
I
I
I
1-*-"
a
I
l-
I
I
I
___
I
_______i__4_
tl
*-:* )
oe
YEARS
*Fitings/stoff _*Tolot sloff
Exhibit 2-K reflects Justice Court stoff ond filings per stoff position, The filings per stoff
hove remoined relotively constont of oround .l,400 for the post two decodes, During
this timefrome totol stoff hos increosed relotively in proportion to populotion, We
project in the future the increose in filings per stoff ond totol stoff will be proportionote
ond by the yeor 2050, there will be o requirement for o totql stoff of 98 positions, which
will be processing on overoge of .l,968 filings per stoff position,
Poge 53 of 356
1
i
tl
1
i
r
F
oUr ,^o
o

EXHIBIT 2t
TOTAT COURT
STAFF REQUIREMENTS
lo
I
-*l_
YEARS
Stoff/I0,000 Counly Populotion
S1off
Sloff/Judiciol Position
-Iotol -Iotol
-Totol
Exhibit 2-L reflects the totol Justice ond District Court requirements for stoff qnd the rotio
of totol stoff per .l0,000 County populotion (recognizing thot for the Justice Court it is
reolly reloted to Township populotion os opposed to totol County populotion but the
Township populotion is consistently 650/" of County populotion) ond the totol stoff per
judiciol positions.
Poge 54 of 356
I
t5
Totol =o
e!
=4o4
o o
A3
"e rtt
6

3. SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Poge 55 of 356

Poge 56 of 356

3. SPACE REAUIREMENTS
Using informotion gothered from the progromming questionnoire responses ond the
initiol follow-up meetings the consultont developed the spoce requirements dotobose
which is set forth in its entirety in Appendix C of this report, A seporote dotobose wos
creoted for eoch mojor division or unit in eoch of the two courts (2nd Judiciol District
Court, Reno Justice Court), the County Sheriff's Deportment, ond other included court
fomily deportments. A dotobose is olso provided for common support spoces such os
the public building entronce lobby, lunchroom, looding dock, building mointenonce
ond similor spoces which ore utilized ond/or shored to some degree by the personnel of
oll occupont ogencies.
The dotobose is o colculotion of stoff ond spoce requirements for current operotions in
2OO7 ond in ten-yeor cohorts from 2020 through 2050, These requirements ore
expressed in net useoble squore feet (NSF) for enclosed rooms ond open oreos octuolly
ossigned to eoch component, NSF does not include the spoce for building structurol
elements (perimeter ond mojor demising wolls, structurol columns), oir conditioning
duct shofts, plumbing choses, elevotor shofts, escolotors, stoirwells, public corridors ond
similor spoces which ore treoted os port of the building gross squore foot (GSF) oreo,
Once cqlculoted, GSF will olso incorporote the colculotion of generol use stoff ond
oublic restrooms which must conform to locol codes ond ordinonces,
The dotobqse identifies required spoce for these components if oll were to be locoted
in o single new building or tightly connected complex of new buildings with o single
entronce used by stoff ond public visitors, All prisoners would be delivered to o single
centrol holding oreo in the focility by the Sheriff's Deportment Tronsportotion Division, lf
these components ore spreod through existing fqcilities, or o combinotion of existing
ond new focilities, the individuol division ond overoll occupied spoce will be
considerobly different thon colculoted in the spoce requirements dotobose,
Exhibit 3A, Stoff ond Spoce Requirements Summory, consolidotes the stoff ond spoce
needs for oll deportments ond mojor divisions included in this Court Complex Moster
Plon Updote, Like the individuol dotoboses, the summory indicotes current stoff in 2007
ond the projected volume in 2O2O, 2O3O, 2040, ond 2050, The onnuol stoff growth rote
over the plonning period is qlso colculoted, The net useoble squqre footoge for eoch
component in eoch of the some plonning cohoris is olso colculoted, As indicoted on
the exhibit, totol stoff for oll court fomily deportments ond divisions is projected to
increose from 418 current personnel to 882 in 2050, o percentoge chonge greoter thon
1007", ot on onnuol rote of I ,8%, Neorly .l96,300 NSF required in 2007 will increose to
opproximotely 331,600 NSF by 2050 if oll projected personnel ore on boord by then,
When common/shore support stoff ond spqce ore odded, there will be 894 personnel in
neorly 352,529 NSF by 2050,
Poge 57 of 356

EXHIBIT 3A
STAFF AND SPACE
REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Deporlmenf / Division
Alternote Public Defender l5 35
Personnel Growlh
Role
07-50
Nel Squore Fe€l
2007 2020 2030 20,',O 2050 2007 2020 2030 2040 2G50
AE 58 69 3.6% A )24 8.019 9,803 I 2.809 14.629
, AlternotiveSentencing 7 t5 20 23 27 3.2% 2,378 3,397 4.314 4.598
3 Countv Clerk 35 35 36 37 39 0.3% 4.458 4.486 4.U3 4,U3 4,755
4 District Attorney
5 Courthouse Office 0 0 0 0 0 0,0% 705 /05 750 750 750
6 Low Librorv t0 il l3 o.w" 9.5A2 I 1.835 ta.29A 17.351 20.982
7 Public Defender 59 t0l 114 128 147 I3.t49 20.244 73.O37 25.527 28.859
8 Reno Justice Court
I Adminisfroiion
l0 Boiliff
ll Court Operotions
l? .lrrdicioru
l3 2nd Judiciol District Court
Court Administrotor/Clerk of the
t4 Court
l5
l6
t7
t8
10
20
22
23
zc
26
27
28
)a
Administrotion
Court Technology
Filing Office
Fomily Couri Division
Court Operotions
Court Progroms
Judiciory
Temporory Protection Office
Generol Jurisdiction Division
-^, 'rt a\nar^f i^nc
Discovery Commissioner
Judiciory
Jury Commissioner
Preiriol Services
Prohote (:ommiqcioner
30 County Sheriff
3l Tronsportotion
32 Centrol Holding
33 Civil
34 Courthouse Security
35 Tronsoortotion Office
7
8
29
7
3
5
28
22
t8
c
t1
3
zc
2
l4
3
0
t9
28
34
l8
ll
40
3
12
38
26
l6
27
5
23
A
34
3
20
5
0
27
37
39
20
14
47
l0
o
t4
39
27
JJ
5
26
A
37
3
23
5
0
30
47
AE,
22
l5
53
t3
o
t6
u
33
23
JI
5
32
4
43
4
5
0
33
A8
36 Totol 4t8 593 &2 776 882 1.8% 196.2%) 2At-251 270.026 305.359 33t.605
37 Common / Shqred Suooort 7 t2 l2 I 1.3% 20.75A 2C.820 20.923 20.923 20.923
38 Tolol Stoft ond Nef Souore Feei 425 605 694 7AA 494 1.7% 216.947 252.fl71 x)o.949 326.282 3s2.s29
Poge 58 of 356
22
t7
62
t5
6
l6
46
A5
25
44
6
36
4
49
3l
5
0
38
53
L8%
r.8%
1.8%
1.6"/"
2.70/"
1.77"
1.77"
o.A7"
r,3%
o.77
1b%
1.6%
1.f/o
0.0%
1.67"
\.a%
A,06
2,718
6,214
19.775
1.762
4,559
1 r,080
5,277
5,664
26,272
2,461'
2,250
1,248
44,921
2,852
3,310
r,399
5,4U
2,795
3.78r
c onq
6,107
2,797
7.198
23.586
|,762
5,283
t2,371
6,123
6,317
36,734
2,461
2,394
1,3U
51,797
2.927
4,170
t.561
5.830
3.708
3.890
A 'NA
6,979
3,O22
7,907
27.200
2,374
F FAa
12,607
A AA<
7,ttb
41,438
2,59A
2,6\6
1,362
58. r 59
? 1(t
4,704
1,56r
6,026
4.010
4,033
A 'Q'
7,420
3,162
8,51 4
34.303
2,392
5,75 r
13,242
7,578
7,626
48,265
2,629
3.048
|,362
64,53 1
3,227
5,334
1,578
6,026
4,212
4,114
A.1AR
7.574
3,356
9,162
37.792
2,392
5,751
8,442
7,947
53,641
2.894
3,336
t,362
71.398
3.565
5,987
I.578
2,526
4,542
a,259
.AM

4. ADJACENCY RELATIONSHIPS
Poge 59 of 356

Poge 60 of 356

4. ADJACENCY RETATIONSHIPS
The following description of importont odjocency relotionships between ond within
eoch court ossumes optimol conditions where oll courts ore locqted within o single new
building or complex of buildings with one primory public ond stoff entronce, Consistent
with the overwhelming preference of the 2no Judiciol District Court, both the Fomily
Division ond the Generol Jurisdiction Division ore to be locoted in the some focility,
While those functions ond operotions unique to eoch division will be collocoted to the
greotest extent possible, the building plon must treot eoch division os equol in stotus
ond stonding, The Reno Justice Court must olso hove o seporote identity but treoted os
on equol justice system ogency. Eoch occupont deportment must olso be
ocknowledged os o seporote entity in the overoll building plon with full-height
oerimeter wolls,
Exhibits 4A, 48,4C, ond 4D ore odjocency/flow diogroms which grophicolly illustrote the
importont relotionships within the Reno Justice Court ond the mojor 2nd Judiciol District
Court components (Court Administrotor/Clerk of Court, Fomily Division ond Generol
Jurisdiction Division) respectively, Exhibit E is os similor odjocency/flow diogrom which
illustrotes the relotionships between oll occupont ogencies in the Court Complex,
Eoch diogrom uses different grophic symbols to portroy the movement of stoff, public
visitors, ond inmotes/persons in custody, moteriol ond vehicles where such movement is
imporfont to component operotions ond security, Although the stoff in eoch
component will hove occess to oll spoces in the component only the mojor stoff occess
requirements ore illustroted to ovoid confusion from cluttered diogroms. While o symbol
is provided for cleor visuol line-of-sight between two or more components, this
requirement is more oppropriote where o diogrom would show internol relotionships
within subdivisions ond units, For exomple, it will be importont for odministrotive support
stoff in on office to be oble to see oll visitors who enter o reception oreo
The diogroms do not illustrote the movement of stoff ond public visitors through the
security screening ond occess control spoce ond equipment in the Building Lobby or
the movement of moteriols within ond between Building Mointenonce ond other
deportments, ogoin becouse thot level of detoil is not necessory in this Moster Plon
Updote. lt is understood thot such movement will toke ploce within the Court Complex,
To foster stoff communicotion ond operotionol efficiency it is importqnt thot oll
elements of eoch deportment or functionol component be collocoted on the some or
immediotely odjocent ond connected floors unless otherwise indicqted in the
discussions of individuol deportments which follow,
Alternqte Public Defender
This office defends the occused when such services connot be provided by the Public
Defender due to conflicts within thot office. lt should be locoted on o lower floor with
convenient public occess, some of which moy toke ploce ofter normol business hours,
Poge61 of356

Alternotive Sentenci no
Although most deportment personnel ore uniformed sworn police officers ond the
primory clients ore sentenced individuols the office does not provide detention/custody
services ond cqn therefore be locoted onywhere in the building, preferobly on o lower
floor,
Countv Clerk
This office is primorily involved in the licensing of businesses ond the issuonce of
morrioge licenses, While it currently shores some microfilming equipment ond file
storoge spoce with the 2no Judiciol District Court Filing Office its services ore not directly
reloted to ony court operotions ond need not be locoted in the courthouse olthough
thot is the preference of the deportment, The public counter/woiting oreo experiences
heovy public visitor volume ond should be locoted immediotely odjocent to the
building lobby. Becouse morrioge licenses ore issued on o 24-hour bosis the office must
be locoted so thot visitors con be prevented from rooming into other more secure
oreos of the building ofter normol business hours,
District Attorney
The Courthouse Office of this deportment provides o ploce for deputy district otiorneys
to work between court oppeoronces so they do not hove to trovel bock ond forih
between their permonently ossigned workspoce in the deportment's moin office ond
the courthouse, The smoll conference room con be used for stoff meetings os well os
for victim/witness conferences, The office should be locoted on on upper floor neor
counrooms,
Low Librorv
The primory function of the Low Librory is to provide occess to legol informotion for
ottorneys, judges, government employees ond the public, In recent yeors the public
visitor hos become the most frequent visitor to this component os more ond more pro
per litigonts require legol ossistonce, For this reoson ond the evening ond weekend
hours of operotion, the Low Librqry should be locoted for convenient public os well os
stoff occess. Visitors from outside the Court Complex should be required to poss
through security screening ond occess control but occess to court operotions oreqs of
the focility should be eosily precluded by security stoff ond the lobby configurotion,
Public Defender
This deportment provides legol representotion for odult indigents occused of felony ond
gross misdemeonor violotions in the 2nd Judiciol District Court, including juvenile
delinquency ond dependency, porole violotion ond oppeol motters. Although o
locotion on o lower floor would probobly be more convenient for the high volume of
public visitors experienced doily by this deporlment, monogement hos suggested o
Poge 62 of 356

preference for odjocency to 2no Judiciol District Court Generol Jurisdiction Division
courtrooms becouse most of the coses ossigned to this deportment ore resolved in thot
court,
Reno Justice Court
Becouse it is highly unlikely thot oll of the Reno Justice Court con be locoted on o single
floor of the Court Complex the Operotions divisions should be collocoted in close
proximity to the Building Lobby becouse of the high volume of public visitors to those
divisions. lf current operotions continue in the future courl porticiponts must oppeor ot
the Boiliff's public counter before oppeoring in o couriroom so the Boiliff ond the
Judiciory elements should be collocoted to the greotest extent possible. These
relotionships ore illustroted on Exhibit 4,A,
2no Judiciol District Court
There ore three mojor components of this court (Court Administrotor/Clerk of Court,
Fomily Division ond Generol Jurisdiction Division), The importont odjocency relotionships
ond flow between the mojor spoces within eoch division ore illustroted on seporote
exhibit diogroms,
The Court Administrotor/Clerk of Court movement is provided on Exhibit 48 where it con
be seen thot the most frequent user is the public visitor which includes 2nd Judiciol
District Court stoff qs well qs other jurisdictions who ottend closses in the troining room
ond representotives of low firms qnd pro per litigonts who visit the filing office, These
should be locoted on on intermediote floor while the Administrotion component con
be locoted on o higher floor, lt is importont thot the Filing Office, which serves both
Fomily ond Generol Jurisdiction divisions, be locoted for convenient occess for persons
otiending to business in either division, The current seporotion of the divisions in
different buildings ond the need for two Filing Offices is not cost effective ond should be
ovoided in the proposed Court Complex if of oll possible,
Exhibit 4C illustrotes Fomily Division relotionships such os the importonce of collocoting
the CASA, Fomily Mediotion ond Self-Help Center progrqms which experience high
public visitor volume, The relotionship between the Temporory Protective Order OPO)
office ond the heoring rooms where ex porte proceedings ore conducted is equolly
importont, Seporote stoff, inmote ond public movement into ond within the Judiciory
element ore perhops the most importont ond certoinly the highest priority security
requirement, Operotions con be on on upper floor but must be within the overoll Fomily
Division oerimeter for convenient stoff occess,
Generol Jurisdiction Division odjocency relotionships ond movement ore illustroted on
Exhibit 4D where ihe high priority movement within the Judiciory element is substontiolly
identicol to thot in the Fomily Division, In oddition the Jury Commissioner spoces hove
unique odjocency needs, Jury Assembly should preferobly be locoted on the ground
Poge 63 of 356

floor becouse it must occommodote high visitor volume but the Grond Jury room
should be locoted for secure inmote movement just os ore the courtrooms ond heoring
rooms, At the some time it must be occessible to stoff ond the public in the some
mqnner os the courtrooms, Offices of the Discovery Commissioner ond the Probote
Commissioner should hove seoorote public entronces but stoff must be oble to reoch
the heoring rooms in the Judiciory oreo without crossing public or inmote routes, This
requirement is not illustroted on Exhibit 4D for clority, Pretriol Services experiences high
public visitor volume ond should be locoted on o lower floor os neor to the public lobby
qs procticol,
Countv Sheriff
The Tronsportotion Division Centrol Holding should be locoted in o secure oreo of the
building, preferobly in the bosement immediotely odjocent to the drive-through vehicle
sollyport, Prisoners unlooded from tronsport vehicles move directly into the pedestrion
sollyport ond from there into the holding oreo where they ore escorled to o holding
cell, Prior to the time o prisoner is scheduled to oppeor in court he or she is escorted
olone or in o group/court line to the courtroom holding oreo odjocent to the
courtroom, Such movement sholl be through o secure elevotor directly to the
courtroom holding oreo withtout crossing stoff or public circulotion,
The Tronsportotion Office should be immediotely odjocent to qnd directly occessible
from Centrol Holding but must olso be locoted for convenient occess by the public,
including ottorneys who need to visit their clients in Centrol Holding, The Tronsportotion
Office, which includes stoff omenities ond functionol work spoces, will be subjected to
heovy use by sheriff's deputies during the doy ond possibly in the eorly morning ond
evening hours,
Spoces in the Courihouse Security component ore more oppropriotely locoted in close
proximity to the Moin Lobby becouse the personnel ossigned to this unit ore responsible
mointoining control over public occess ond security throughout the building,
The primory responsibility of the Civil Division is the service of documents for individuols,
courts ond other county ogencies, The bulk of the division's work comes through the
Reno Justice Court so the division personnel ond work oreo should be in close proximity
to the moin public counter of thot court ond reodily occessible to the court operotions
personnel os well os the public,
Court Complex
Adjocency relotionships for the entire Court Complex ore illustroted on Exhibit 4E, The
diogrom emphosizes the secure movement of prisoners from Centrol Holding to the
holding oreos in eoch court ond the close proximity requirement between the Sheriff's
Civil Division ond the Reno Justice Court Operotions ond between the Sheriff's
Courthouse Security component ond the public lobby, The Low Librory ond the County
Poge M of 356

Clerk ore within the security perimeter of the Complex but positioned to limit the obility
of public visitors ofter normol business hours ond on weekends to occess oreos of the
building thot would be closed during those times, The delivery of moteriel to Building
Mointenonce by vehicle ond the need to move such moteriel throughout the Complex
is olso illustroted,
Poge 65 of 356

EXHIBIT 4A
ADJACENCY / FLOW DIAGRAM
RENO JUSTICE COURT
Stsfr r
hblic r r t
{rrr
I
I
I
t
I
I
T
t
I
I
t
I
I
t
t
rrfrrr
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
t
hmstr
It[cEriEl
l r r
W IillilI
Poge 66 of 356
Conthoms
Visual
Vehiclc
@ ililililil1ililil 1
Strrifr
Tlauqpfftatior
C€dal
Holdiag

EXHIBIT 48
ADJACENCY / FIOW DIAGRAM
2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - COURT ADMINISTRATOR / CTERK OF
COURT
Staf
Public r r r
-
llltr
llllt
Inmate
Mrterial
I
I
I
I
f
t
I I
I
I
I
I II
I
I
t
T
I
r
I
rltllr
ffi
Iiili:I
Poge 67 of 356
Vi$sl
Vehicle
ilil illil lil illlll

EXHIBIT 4C
ADJACENCY / FIOW DIAGRAM
2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - FAMITY DIVISION
Family
Mediation
Self-Ilelp
Strff r
Public r r r
I
-
I
rrrlrr I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
Imatc
Mat€risl
W IiIIiiI
Poge 68 of 356
Courhoms
HearingRosrnr
Visual W
v&blc llllllllllllllllll
Shcrifr
Traupstation
C€ntrd
Ilolding

ADJACENCY / FLOW DIAGRAM
2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT . GENERAT JURISDICTION DIVISION
' Jrry\-7s
C6rntrttiggig4f
Sbff r
Public r r r
,
a o I
llrtrrrl_ I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
rtrrrr|. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IIIIIII
lrrrrt
frrrrrrr
I
r
-llll
-
I
I
I
I
r I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
Inmet€ ffi
Mrterial riil:ir
Poge 69 of 356
C;ourhoomr
HearingRoms
Judgss'
Blsvator
Visugl
vchiclc lllllllllillllllll
shitr
Trmspctatim
Ccuhal
Holding

ADJACENCY / FLOW DIAGRAM
COURT COMPTEX
Staff r
hlblic r r r
t
f. -ito-
.rrrtil..r{
rrrrrlrrllttr
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
IT
T
I
eu rJ
Departmeun
TII
arrrtrrrrr
IITIIII
I
I
rrrrrrrrrt
:/
t
r
l\
f
lr
\'
@rrrr
Imsts ffi
Mat€rirl rirrrr
Poge 70 of 356
I
T
I
t
:
I
t
I
T
I
I
I
rrlr t
I
t
T
hrblic Partiag
ilililililililililillilllillilillllllllllllllllllllillllllllllll I
Public
Dcftnder
ilrrrrrrJ
Viturl W
vdiclc llllllllllllllllll

5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Poge 71 of 356

Poge 72 of 356

5. PARKINGRESUIREMENTS
The demond for porking, os surveyed by the Woshoe County Deportment of Public
Works eorlier in 2OO7, identified the number of porking spoces required by code,
number of employees, number of visitors, ond on estimote of the number of County
vehicles requiring porking occommodotions. This is provided in Exhibit 5-l,
Porking in the proximity to the existing Courthouse is in short supply ond the County hos
secured occess to opproximotely .|,007 porking spoces in the generol downtown oreo
thot con support stoff ond visitors to the Courts Complex, This is disployed in Exhibit 5-2,
Of the 1,007 porking spoces generolly ovoiloble in downtown Reno, the County hos
identified 491 spoces os being ovoiloble for exclusive Courthouse use, This includes 449
spoces in the Gollery goroge ond 42 spoces in the Sierro Street lot. Projections of future
requirements to support upwords of 45 judiciol positions thot include on increose of 2l
equivolent judiciol positions, visitors to those odditionol 2l courlrooms, ond on
odditionol 469 stoff indicote o substontiol increose in porking requirements thot should
be provided in o combinotion of new construction ond through the development of
the Pioneer site,
Exhibit 5-3 identifies current porking requirements on Line No. 7 of 1,060 spoces, Utilizing
the 491 spoces currently ovoiloble (Exhibit 5-2), spoces thot con be provided on one
level of new construction (for judges ond secured stoff only), spoces ovoiloble in both
the norlh ond south porking oreos of One South Sierro, ond on-street porking, plus on
qssumed 500 porking spoces to be provided by the developer of the Pioneer site (this is
o primory criterio for the sole or leose of thot portion of the Pioneer site not reserved for
court exponsion to o developer), indicotes thot, when Phose I of the development is
completed, there will be o resource of 1,282 porking spoces, This provides o momentory
surplus of 224 spoces qfter the yeor 2O2O.
As Phose ll is developed ond on odditionol l2 courts ore developed ond qn odditionol
235 stoff (port of the totol increose of 469 positions) ore odded to the suppori
deportments, there will be on increosed need for 393 porking spoces (Line No. 7 of
Exhibit 5-3), This indicotes o shortoge of thot juncture of '169 spoces thot would need to
be provided in conjunction with Phose ll construction, odjocent to or under court
focilities ond ovoiloble os secured spoces for County stoff.
In 2030 Io2O4O timefrome Phose lll will see on odditionol nine courfs being developed
to reoch the totol copocity of 45 equivolent judiciol positions ond 234 stoff being
odded. By thot juncture there will be o need for on odditionol 342 porking spoces,
which, when odded to the 169 porking spoce shortoge forecost in Phose ll, will bring
the totol deficit of community build-out to 511 porking spoces, lt is this estimote of 5l I
porking spoces thot need to be occommodoted, through construction of porking
structures odjocent to or beneoth new courthouse construction on the Pioneer site
ond/or the closure of Court Street ond o smoller porlion of the Pioneer site,
Site plonning concepts ore developed in Chopter 9 to identify oppropriote locotions
ond costs for the development of these odditionol 511 porking spoces, This onolysis
Poge 73 of 356

ossumes thot the privote-sector developer selected to develop commerciol spoces on
thot portion of the Pioneer site not reserved for utilizotion of the courts will provide for
500 porking spoces outside of the footprint of future court fqcilities developed by
Woshoe County within three blocks of the Courlhouse Complex,
Poge 74 of 356

EXHIBIT 5.I
COUNW DOWNTOWN RENO PARKING DEMAND SUMMARY
Locotion
Spoces
by City
Code
Number of
Employees
Number
of
Visitors
(doilY)
Number
of
Visilors
(hourly)
Number
of
County
Vehicles
Libefi Center (350 S.
Cenfer St.)
235
SociolServices 282 370 46 60
Clerk I B I
Juvenile Services tz 25 ?
Collections 6 6 I I
I Colifomio 66
Public Defender 65 50 6 B
Librory 121
Administrotion 64 250 3l 4
Courts Complex
I S. Siero Street 246 r 500- 408
Reno Justice Court 52 I
District Court (Fomily Division) 3B
Constoble 2
Mills B. Lone Justice
Center
209 r 200 418
Nofes
Estimoted number
of doily visitors.
Woiting counts
from Scottie
Wolloce.
peok hour counl
(1-2pm M-F)
odjusted to
occount for
emplovee troffic
peok hour count
(1-2pm M-F)
odjusied to
occount for
employee troffic
District Attorney 202 IB
Reno Municipol
Court
75 Courl Street /
Histodc Courthouse
250
74
975 ll4 peok hour count
Clerk 32
District Court 135
Low Librory 9
need spoce for
FM, SO, lT, CASA, Court Services 30 4
other FM octivities
(pointer,
corpenter, etc.)
Poge 75 of 356

Totol 892 994 4384 1029 99
Poge 76 of 356

EXHIBIT 5-2
COUNTY DOWNTOWN PARKING SUPPLY SUMMARY
Locotion
Nevodo Discovery
Tofol
Sooces
Center (old citv holl) 57 F.-7
22O S. Center St
goroge (Liberty
Center) 399 202
I Colifornio
50 W. Liberty (Bonk of
Americo)
64 64
Spoces for
County
Use Noles
Annu
ol
Costs
Mon
Unit
Cost
County vehicles ot night; clients
in doytime; Expect to vocote
4/O9 s23,940 s35.00
Sociol Services. 197 spoces
leosed to 200 S, Viroinio. s0,00
lncluded in leose for Public
Defender spoce, volue bosed
on overooe cost per spoce. s29,702 s38.67
Gove up spoces when DA
moved
Pioneer Lot ll5 il5 Own s0,00
75 Court St. l5 Own s0.00
I S. Sierro St. zz 22 Own s0.00
Mills Lone 40 40 Own s0.00
58 ossigned to Reno Municipol $r77,r5
Gollerv Gorooe 361 '449
Court oer ooreement
6 s40.89
Gollery Goroge - DA
sooces
'l?
1.3
DA Uses 30 porking vouchers
moximum oer month for visitors $990 s63.46
Sierro Street Lot 42 ' 42,
l5 not currently used by County
stoff. Exoect terminotion 9/08
Sl5/bi-weekly porking
ollowonce to 388 employees,
oll but obout
sr 2.000 s23.Bl
Porkino Allowonces il0 il0
.l00 poy
ollowonce bock to County for
porking vouchers in County
spoce, s42,900
S286,68
$32.50
Totol
Totol physicolspoces,
1226.3 I I 17.3
B
excludes ollowonces
Number of porking
I I16.3 1007.3
locotions 9
Poge 77 of 356

EXHIBIT 5-3
WASHOE COUNW COURT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
No. Spoce/Porkinq Component
Phqse I
(2Or2 -
2020\
Phqse ll
(2O2O -
2030)
Phose lll
(2030 -
20401
I Phose I Construclion on Court Street/Pioneer Site INITIAL ADDITIONAT ADDITIONAT
z No, of Courts @.l5 Spoces/Court (.l5 X # l6) 360 180 135
? Stoff @ 80% of Totol (,80 X # l5) 340 r88 187
4
Jury @ 60% (Mondoys, decreose to 5"/" on Fridoy)
fl) 50 25 20
5 Phose ll Add 2 Floors io One South Sierro 750 393 342
6 Totol Required for Mills B, Lone Buildins (south) (2) 3'10 0 0
7 Totql Spoces Required (#2+#3+#4+#5) 1,060 393 342'
B Current Spoces Avoiloble to be Retoined 491 0 0
9 One South Sierro (n&s) & .l965 Addition Spoces 77 n 0
t0 Sooces Provided in Phose I Construction il6 n 0
il Totol Provided by Pioneer Site Developer 500 0 0
12 Street Porkins Within 3 Blocks 100 0 0
l3 Totol Spoces Provided (#8:#l 2) 1.284 0
14
'lR
IU
Shorlqqe to be Provided (#7-#t3) lSurplus)
Stoff to Support
(224}
425
I69l
235
5t'i
234
t6 Number of Couris 24 36 45
Note (1): Assume 15"/" of counts require 14 spoces for jury porking,
Note (2): For District Atforney ond Reno Municipol Court,
Poge 78 of 356

5. OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Poge 79 of 356

Poge 80 of 356

5. OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
The consultont wos requested to study operotionol improvements thqt might be
initioted by the courts in on efforf to minimize new construction requirements, The study
briefly explored the possibility of initioting o limited night court operotion ond reducing
courtroom requirements by more fully utilizing video orroignment, Additionolly, the
County Commissioners requested o review of the level of utilizotion of existing
courtrooms to determine if odjustments in court procedures could increose the throughput
copocity of courts thereby reducing the need to construct odditionol courts in
future yeors.
A. Nighi Courl
It wos found thot the demond for night court within the Justice Court ond the Fomily
Court Division filings thot could be conducted in the lote ofternoon leorly evening
without necessitoting the presence of oll other judiciol system representotives wos quite
limited. A limited survey conducted by o Justice Court during November 2007 identified
less thon o hondful of qctuol court users thot expressed o desire for night court, The
onolysis proceeded to identify ihe cost of conducting limited night court including the
rother significont stoffing requirements qnd then compore the cost per hour of night
court time ogoinst on hour of doytime courl time including stoff solory differentiols
(some overtime is required) ond the copitol cost of constructing o courtroom,
The result wos thot while moximum utilizotion of o night court between the Justice Court
ond the Fomily Court Division of the District Court might reduce long-term requirements
by up to one-holf of o courtroom (from o bose of 45 judiciol positions ond 40 or more
courtrooms), the moximum sovings by reducing the requirement for hqlf o courtroom
ond thus reducing copitol requirements wqs less ihon 20"/" of the increosed cost of
stoffing o night courl for the estimoted 546 hours per yeqr the court would operote,
During explorotory discussions with the 2no Judiciol District Court ond the Reno Justice
Court odministrotors it wos determined first thot the term night court wos misleoding
ond it should be understood to meon lote offernoon or eorly evening generolly
between the hours of 5:00pm ond 9:00pm of the very lotest, lt wos olso determined
thot there could be opportunities to conduct only limited Reno Justice Courf ond 2nd
Judiciol District Court Fomily Division proceedings in the evening, possibly no more
frequently thqn one night per week or every other week,
Such limited octivity would be consistent with the results of the speciolized court survey
conducted by the Notionol Center for Stote Courts (NCSC) in 2OO4. The survey
generoted responses from 25 stotes ond the District of Columbio. As o generol rule in
most responding stotes o judiciol officer wos ovoiloble 24 hours per doy, seven doys per
week to heor selected ex porte juvenile ond fomily motters (domestic violence, juvenile
obuse, etc.). Mony reported thot such heorings were scheduled during doytime hours
ond conducted by o judiciol officer on coll ofter normol business hours ond on
weekends ond holidoys. The 2nd Judiciol District Court Fomily Division currently provides
such services in the some monner, Typicolly, smoll cloims ond troffic citotions were the
most common motters heord in night court but most often only one night per week two
Poge 81 of 356

weeks per month even in the lorger cities ond counties in stotes such os Colifornio,
Nevodo, New Jersey, New York, ond Ohio,
However the Fomily Division ond Reno Justice Courf odministrqtors ond some members
of the judiciory expressed strong reservotions obout the cost effectiveness ond county
resident demond for night court services even on o limited bosis, lt is believed the most
voluoble element of such o progrom is the opporfunity for on employed defendont to
oppeor of night rother thon risk loss of employment, However, mony persons in Woshoe
County ore employed in the goming ond hospitolity fields ond work evening ond night
shifts so there moy not be os much demond os in other jurisdictions, Service to the
public should be the primory motivotion for extending court services into the eorly
evening. Therefore the court odministrotors ond the consultont ogree there should be
o survey token of court visitors to ottempt to determine whether there is o reosonobly
significont demond,
Reno Justice Courf (RJC) believes smoll cloims ond troffic proceedings could be
conducted in the evening ond would probobly generote the highest demond, The
following stoff would likely be required eoch evening, lt is understood the RJC judges
will be discussing night court in o meeting scheduled for August 28th,
. I judiciol officer (udge, moster, commissioner perhops),
o 3 boiliffs.
r I courtroom clerk,
. 2 court clerks,
. I courf clerk supervisor,
o I interpreter,
The 2nd District Court Fomily Division cites uncontested divorces not involving children,
nome chonges ond morrioges of minors os the types of proceedings thot could be
conducted in the evening, The court currently hos o progrom for emergency
temporory protective orders OPO$ thot operotes on o 24-hour bosis using volunteers
who ore on-coll from home, The suggested stoffing for extended court, not including
the TPO progrom, would be os follows,
o 1 judge or moster,
. 1 judiciol ossistont,
r I court clerk,
. I filing office clerk,
. 3 boiliffs,
There is some disogreement os to whether someone from the Self Help ond Fomily
Mediotion progroms should be on duty during evening court hours for minors
ottempting to mony becouse so mony Fomily Court litigonts ore pro se,
Poge 82 of 356

In oddition to the obove stoff, there ore courl-house operotions ond security personnel
including sheriff deputies (building occess control ond rovers), lT technicol support, ond
building mointenonce thot would be required for night court, The possible need for
deputy district otlorneys ond public defenders must olso be considered, In order to test
the cost effectiveness of night court progroms for the Reno Justice Court ond the Fomily
Court Division comporotive costs for night ond doy courl were developed for two
ootions,
Option o encompossed night court operotions for four hours from 5:00pm to 9:O0pm to
include Reno Justice Court citotions ond smoll cloims proceedings ond Fomily Court
uncontested divorces not involving children, minor morrioges ond nome chonges.
Option B encompossed night court operotions for three hours from 5:00pm to 8:00pm
including the some cose types os Option A except Reno Justice Court citotions were
omitted, The cost figures for required personnel in night ond doy court for eoch option,
os provided by the County Finonce Deportment Budget Division, ore illustroted on
Exhibits 6-1, 6-2,6-3 ond 6-4,
The cost of providing o two-court, night court operotion for o four-hour shift totols
52,872,36 os presented on Exhibit 6-l, For the eight operoting hours of the courfrooms
(two courts of four hours eoch), this equotes to o unit cost of $359 per hour of court
ooerotion,
Exhibit 6-2 identifies the equivolent cost for operoting courts during normol hours for o
full eight-hour shifl when entronce security provisions ore olreody being provided, This
totols o unit cost of $5,670 for the 80 hours of courtroom copobility (eight hours
multiplied by ten couris), This equotes to o unit cost of 570.88 per courtroom hour,
There is on obvious economy to operote courts during the normol doytime hour ot
stondord hourly costs os opposed to the premium ond inefficiency of operoting courts
in the evening. The cost differentiol is more thqn five fold,
The cost of operoting two courts for three hours in the evening is shown on Exhibit 6-3
ond totols $1,714. For the six courtroom hours ovoiloble, this equotes to o unit cost of
5286 per courtroom hour,
Exhibit 6-4 identifies the cost of operotion during doytime hours to be $5,969, For the 80
courtroom hours provided, this equotes to o unit cost o'f $74.61 per hour.
The demond for night court hos not been demonstroted bosed on o limited survey
conducted by the Justice Court with o recent updote of the user suryey os recently os
November 2OO7, However, to ottempt to identify the potentiol utilizotion for night court,
Exhibit 6-5 wos developed, The totol onnuol filings, estimoted courtroom time
expended to complete eoch filing, ond the onnuol time in hours thot o courtroom
would be required is presented,
For the Fomily Court the totol courtroom time for oll motters thot might be compotible
with night court totols 765 hours per yeor, For the Reno Justice Court, the totol time for
oll opplicoble filings is estimoted of 3,.l04 hours, The totol time for both courts is 3,869
nours per yeor,
Poge 83 of 356

However, if it is ossumed (there is no demonstroted demond) thot possibly os mony os
l5o/" of oll coses could be heord in the evening to occommodote public convenience,
This however hos not been verified by ony survey, lf 15"/" of the Fomily Court filings were
heord in the evening, this could be occomplished in one three-to-four hour session
every other week, which would provide .|04 hours per yeor (.l5% x 765 = 114 hours), The
once-per-week four-hour session simuloted in Exhibit 6-l would require 28"/" of oll Fomily
Court filings thot ore opplicoble for night court to be heord in the evening.
The Justice Court would require three, three-hour sessions per week (or two four-hour
sessions) to process l5% of their opplicoble filings, which would require 465 hours (9
hours per week for 52 weeks = 468 hours per yeor),
The cost for conducting three, three-hour court sessions for the Justice Court every
week ond one three-hour session for the Fomily Court every other week is colculoted to
be 56,93.| every two weeks for 2l hours of courtroom copocity, This equotes to on
overoge cost of $330 per hour, The cost of doytime operotions of 574.6.| per hour is I 14
the cost of night court operotions, Token over o full yeor, the increosed court operoting
cost of $256 per hour ($330 - $74), bosed on 546 hours of courtroom operotion per yeor,
would indicoie o cost increose for the stoff of $139,726.
Portiolly offsetting this would be the volue of o portion of o courtroom thot would be
reduced from whot would otherwise be required, The 546 hours of courtroom operotion
would represent on equivolent of I /3 of o courtroom onnuol utilizotion, The cost of
developing o courtroom thot overoges 3,000 gross squore feet including the immediote
support oreo, circulotion, ond gross-up of o totql development cost of $400 per squore
foot is estimoted of $.|,200,000, This would result in on onnuol cost of 572,000 bosed
upon o 6% onnuol debt omortizotion schedule (nominolly 5% debt finoncing omortized
over 28 yeors),
Theoreticqlly, full utilizotion of o night court for 546 hours per yeor to process l57o of the
opplicoble filings would reduce the need for 1/3 of o courl'room, With the onnuol cost
of providing o full courtroom of $72,000 per yeor, I /3 of o couriroom could be volued
ot $24,000 per yeor,
It oppeors the moximum sovings in reducing courtroom requirements of $24,000 is less
thon 20% of the 5139,726 increosed cost of stoffing the night court for 546 hours per
yeor,
Poge 84 of 356

EXHIBIT 6- I
Night Courl Cosls
Option A
Court ond Stoff
Fomily Court
Court Moster
Judiciol Assistont
Court Clerk ll
Deputy Clerk ll
(Filing Office)
Averog
e
Hourly
Wooe
s48,25
s28.4.|
$23,65
st9.t0
OT
Hourly
Rote
n/o
s42.62
s35.48
s28,65
Hour
s
Deputy Sheriff/Boiliff
Subtotol Fomily
s25.98 s38,97 4
Court 20
Reno Juslice Court
Judge
Courtroom Clerk I
Court Clerk ll
Supervising Clerk lll
lnterpreter/Clerk
Boiliff
s65,04
$23,88
s25,78
$s0,06
s22.10
s23,94
n/o
$35.82
s38,67
$45,0e
$33, I 5
s35,9r
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
#of
Position
s
I
I
'l
I
q
I
I
'2
I
I
Weekly
Cosl
Flex
s I 70,48
sr 4r ,92
$l .l4,60
s467.64
s894,64
Flex
$143,28
s309.36
s180,36
sr 32,60
s430,92
Subtotql Reno
Justice Court 24 9 $r,196,52
Supporl
Courf Security
Officer
Technology
Support
$18,44
s22.92
$27,66
s34,38
Jonitoriol
Deputy
n/o 4
I
Sheriff/Rover
s25,98 $38.e7 4
2 s3l L76
SubtotolSuoport t6 7 s7Br.20
Totols 84 24 52,872.36
4
4
Poge 85 of 356
I
$33r,92
$137,52
Assumplions
* One night per week,
Spm - 9pm
* Uncontested Divorce.
no children
* Morrioges of Minors
* Nome Chonge
" Survey required to
determine demond
* One night per week,
Spm - 9pm
. Citotions
. Smoll.Cloims
* Survey required to
determine demond
. All night court in one
courthouse
* Two courlrooms on
seporote floors
* Minimum one occess
controlstotion

Note:
Overtime (OD hourly rote = Hourly Woge X 1,5
Poge 86 of 356

EXHIBIT 6.2
DAY COURT COSTS
OPTION A
Courl qnd Stqff
Fomily Court
Court Moster (1)
Judiciol Assistont
Courl Clerk ll
Deputy Clerk ll (Filing
Office)
De-puty Sherlfr/ Bo i liff
Subtotol Fomily Court
Reno Juslice Court
Judge
Courtroom Clerk I
Court Clerk ll
Supervising Clerk lll
Interpreter/Clerk
Boiliff
Averog
e
Hourly
Wooe
s48,25
$28,41
$2s,65
sre,r0
s25,98
s65.04
s2s,88
s25,78
s30,06
s22.10
s,2--3,94
OT
Hourly
Rqte
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/q
n/o
Houls
Note:
(1) Number of positions does not include 4 judges
>,(
R.
q
d
A
-- i;'o
#of
Position
Subtotol Reno Justice
Court 48 22
Supporl
Court Security Officer
Technology Support
Jonitoriol
D e_p_uty S h er i ff / Royei
Subtotol Support
sr 8,44
s22,e2
s25,98
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
8
8
8
8
8
6
--- 8
s
tr
I
2
?
I
12
A
2
z
I
7
7
--^---';
Doily
Cosl
Flex
s227.28
$378.40
s458,40
s7o7,84
$t,271,92
Flex
s955,20
s4t2,48
$480,96
$176,80
sli40_,64
s3,366,08
s'r,032,64
s0,00
s0,00
$i,oCr 6;
Totols 328 41 $5,670.64
Poge 87 of 356
Assumplions

EXHIBIT 5.3
NIGHT COURT COSTS
OPTION B
Court ond Stoff
Fomily Coud
Court Moster
Judiciol Assistont
Court Clerk ll
Deputy Clerk ll
(Filing Office)
Deoutu Sheriff/Boiliff
Subtotol Fomily
Courf
Reno Justice Courl
Judge
Courfroom Clerk I
Court Clerk ll
Supervising Clerk lll
Interpreter/Clerk
Averoge
Houily
Woge
$48.25
$28.41
s23.65
sr9.r0
$25,98
s65.04
s23.BB
$25.78
s30,06
s22,to
OI
Hourly
Role
n/o
s42,62
s35.48
$28.65
s38.97
Hours
Note:
Overtime (OD hourly rote = Hourly Woge X 1,5
3
#of
Positions
I
'|
I
I
I
A
Weekly
Cosl
Flex
$127,86
s 106.44
$85.95
s350,73
s670.92
Boiliff
SubtotolReno
s23.94 $35.e1
Justice Court t2 6 s574.47
Support
Court Security
Officer
Technology
Support
s18.44
s22.92
n/o
s35,82
s38.67
s45.09
s33. I s
s27.66
s34,38
I
I
1
I
Flex
s0,00
sr 16.0r
sr 35,27
s0.00
s323. r 9
Jonitoriol
Deputy
n/o
Sheriff/Rover
s25.98 s38.97
I sr r 6.91
SubtotolSuoport 9 s468.99
?
3 I
s248.94
$r03.14
Tolols 48 I6 $l ,714.30
Poge 88 of 356
Assumptions
*
One night per week,
Spm - Bpm
*
Uncontested Divorce, no
children
" Morrioges of Minors
" Nome Chonge
* Survey required to
determine demond
* One night per week,
Spm - Bpm
t Smoll Cloims only, no
Citotions
" Survey required to
determine demond
. All night court in one
courthouse
* Two courtrooms on the
some floor
* Minimum one occess
controlstotion

EXHIBIT 6.4
DAY COURT COSTS
OPTION B
Courf ond Sloff
Fomily Court
Court Moster (1)
Judiciol Assistont
Averoge
Hourly
Woge
s48,25
s28,41
OT
Hourly
Rote
n/o
n/o
n/o
Hours
8
8
#of
Posilions
I
Weekly
Cosl
Flex
$227,28
Court Clerk ll
Deputy Clerk ll
$23,65
8 z s378,40
(Filing Office)
Deputy
$19,10 n/o
s458,40
Sheriff/Boiliff
Subtoiol Fomily
s25,98 n/o
6 s1,247.O4
Court 40 17 $2,3r r,r2
Reno Juslice Courl
Judge
Courtroom Clerk I
Court Clerk ll
Supervising Clerk lll
lnterpreterlClerk
Boiliff
$65.04
s2s,88
s25,78
$30.06
s22,10
s23,94
n/o
n/q
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
,c
8
A
8
z
2
7
Flex
s0,00
s412,48
s480.96
$0,00
s1,340,64
Subtotol Reno
Justice Court JZ t6 s2,234,O8
Support
Court Security
Officer
Technology
Support
$18.44
s22,92
Jonitoriql
Deputy
n/o
Sheriff/Rover
Subtotol Support
$25,e8 s38,e7 8
24
I
s207,84
$1,423.84
n/o
n/o
A
Poge 89 of 356
7
I
$1,032.64
s183.36
Assumplions
* One night per
week, Spm - 8pm
* Uncontested
Divorce, no children
" Morrioges of
Minors
* Nome Chonge
*Survey required to
determine demond
" One night per
week, Spm - 8pm
* Smoll Cloims only,
no Citotions
* Survey required to
determine demond
. All night court in
one courthouse
* Two courtrooms on
the some floor
" Minimum one
occess control
stotion

lrotor, I | | sscl orl $s,ro.o+l
Note:
(1) Number of positions does not include 4 judges
Poge 90 of 356

EXHIBIT 6-
5
NIGHT COURT SCHEDUTING
Quontity ond time required for eoch n the two courts hove been
AnnuqlTime
Court Proceeding
Fomily Court (l)
Annuol Filinqs Time (Mins)
(Hours)
Minor Morrioge
14
25
5.83
Nome Chonge
246
r0
4t,00
Divorce - No Children
Reno Justice Court (2)
Smoll Cloims
Citotions
Subtotol
Totol
estimoted os indicoted in the following exhibit:
Notes:
(1) Annuol filings 07/2006 thru 06/2007, Time bosed on cose weighi minutes by
NCSC in recent study,
(2) Annuol filings 2006,
Smoll cloims time bosed on recent scheduling of 25 coses in 3,5 hours with
knowledge thot oll would not oppeor, Citotion time bosed on recent heoring of
66 coses in 3.75 hours. Neorly 400 were scheduled for the full doy,
484
2,241
42,078
Poge91 of356
89
8
4
717.93
298.80
2805.20
3104,00
3868,76

B. Video Arroignmenl
The evoluotion of the economies ovoiloble by fully implementing video orroignment in
the Generol Jurisdiction Division of the District Court os it is currently neorly fully
implemented in the Justice Court is the focus of this section of Chopter 6, A summory of
the findings is thot there is the potentiol to reduce operoting costs ond ultimotely
reduce the need for one courfroom of full community build-out if video orroignment
wos implemented ond utilized to the moximum degree in the Generol Jurisdiction
Division of the District Court. Sovings of $296,480 per yeor were estimoted, This is o
combinotion of the volue of reduced construction cooitol cost ond reduced Sheriff
tronsportotion cost to move persons in-custody,
lf oll Generol Jurisdiction orroignments were hondled by o Mogistrote, which would be
on odditionol position thot would hove to be engoged of opproximotely $100,000 per
yeor, the equivolent of one courtroom could be mode ovoiloble for use by judges for
other motters, Some rescheduling of octivities would, of course, be necessory, The
judiciory ond Public Defender ore not necessorily comfortoble with video onoignment
qs it removes the "personol contoct ond observotion" between the judge ond the
defendont, This is possibly troublesome,
The County Atl'orney ond Public Defender ore currently opposed to video orroignment
becouse its implementotion would disrupi current cose ossignment policies by requiring
their personnel to be present of the joil os well os of the Courthouse, However, other
jurisdictions hove conducted video orroignment without olwoys requiring the presence
of the Public Defender or District Atlorney in o detention setting, The bolonce of this
section of the report comes to o conclusion thot further study of video orroignment with
oll system porticiponts is worronted,
The consultont wos requested to study operotionol improvements thot might be
initioted by the courts in on effort to minimize new construction requirements, The study
briefly explored the possibility of initioting o limited night court operotion ond reducing
courtroom requirements by more fully utilizing video orroignment, Additionqlly, the
County Commissioners requested o review of the level of utilizotion of existing
courtrooms to determine if odjustments in court procedures could increose the throughput
copocity of courts thereby reducing the need to construct odditionol courts in
future yeors,
Arroignment by video of persons incqrceroted in the Wqshoe County Joil occurs doily
for the Reno Justice ond Municipol courts ond the Sporks Justice qnd Municipol courts,
In 2000 there were .l6,686 orroignments conducted for those courts, In 2006 there were
neorly .|8,.l00 video orroignments, The volume peoked of .l8,684 in 2OO2, One room for
Reno ond Sporks Justice Court proceedings ond one for both cities' municipol
proceedings ore dedicoted in the County Joil. Cleorly the concept ond the
technology hove been occepted ond highly utilized in these limited jurisdiction courts in
Woshoe County,
However, the 2nd Judiciol District Court Generol Jurisdiction Division does not conduct
ony orroignments or other proceedings by video ond the vost mojority; if not oll division
Poge92 of 356

judges ore opposed to the use of such technology for criminol motter oppeoronces in
their courtrooms, The bosis for this opposition is rooted in the constitutionol right for
defendonts to foce their occusers in court ond the judiciory's desire to observe the
demeonor of the occused during court proceedings,
To some degree the offices of the County Attorney ond the Public Defender ore olso
opposed to video orroignment becouse its implementotion in the Generol Jurisdiction
Division would disrupt current cose ossignment policies by requiring personnel to be
present of the joil os well qs in the courthouse,
As o result of the unwillingness of the Generol Jurisdiction Division to utilize video
orroignment the Sheriff's Deportment must tronsport in-custody defendonts from the joil
to boih courthouses in Downtown Reno for orroignments os well qs triols ond other
oppeoronces, Totol in-custody tronsports to the 2nd Judiciol District Court hove
increosed over the post yeors from 5,.l09 in 2000 Io 8,728 in 2006, During the some
period in-custody tronsports to the other courfs (Reno ond Sporks Justice ond
Municipol) remoined foirly constont ot just under or slightly more thqn 5,000, The other
court video orroignments increosed by .|,366 from I 6,686 in 2000 to I8,052 in 2006,
To hondle the consideroble number of in-custody tronsporfs the Sheriff's Deportment
mointoins four l3-possenger vons, two 7-possenger vons, one S-possenger von ond one
2O-possenger bus, The vons ond bus ore used doily to tronsport inmotes between the
joil ond the courthouses, medicol focilities ond occosionolly to the stote prison,
Eighteen deputy sheriffs ore ossigned to tronsport duties currently with o projected
need for 28 by 2050. The vehicles ore dispotched occording to the number of inmotes
scheduled to oppeor in eoch courl ond the tronsport stoff normolly remoin of the
Historic Courthouse to ossist deputies who serve os boiliffs in the Generol Jurisdiction
Division in the movement ond monitoring of inmotes in the courthouse, While on
onolysis of the costs qssocioted with in-custody tronsport to eoch court might be helpful
in determining the volue of video orroignment in the Generol Jurisdiction Division, the
process involved in selecting the oppropriote vehicle ond stoff for on in-custody
pqssenger count thot chonges doily for different types of oppeoronces (orroignment,
triol, stotus conferences, etc,) of severol different locotions is quiie complex, As o result
only the totol tronsport count for eoch focility is mointoined for more thqn o few doys,
Therefore the onolysis of video orroignment in the Generol Jurisdiction Division is
centered on whether the use thereof could limit the number of courtrooms required in
future yeors, The consultont requested ond the Sheriff's Deportment provided dqto
relevont to in-custody tronsports to the Generol Jurisdiction Division for orroignment
during the nine doys between August 27 ond September 7, 2OA7 . September 3 wos o
holidoy ond there were no tronsporfs, Doto wos ovoiloble for seven of the eight
deportments in the division to which 124 inmotes were delivered for orroignment of on
overoge totol of 14 per doy (l 24+9 = .l3,78) or two per deportment (14+7 = 2),
Courf Administrotion estimotes thot eoch orroignment consumes obout l5 minutes, At
q rote of 30 minutes for two in-custody orroignments in eoch deportment is not o
significont droin on courtroom use thot would be ovoided if video orroignment wos
odopted, However, if the time for 14 doily in-custody orroignments of l5 minutes eoch
Poge 93 of 356

occurs in o single courtroom the 2.l0 minutes is equol Io 44"/" of the 480 minutes or eight
hours of ovoiloble couriroom open time eoch doy, This colculotion does not indicote
the reduction of one courtroom could be ochieved through the use of video
orroignment,
However, if eoch of the 16 Generol Jurisdiction Division judges projected for 2050
conducts two in-custody orroignments of l5 minutes eoch every doy the totol time
devoted to those proceedings is 480 minutes (16 x 30 minutes), the equivolent ovoiloble
time in o courtroom ooen for o full dov,
Judiciol time could be ollocoted to courtroom motters other thon orroignment if oll
District Court onoignments were conducted by o Mogistrote or o dedicoted judiciol
officer utilizing o conference or heoring room, This would not then require on ollocotion
of o judiciol resource thot could, during the time o Mogistrote or other judiciol officer is
conducting orroignments, be utilizing o courtroom for other motters,
The tronsfer of oll orroignment to o Mogistrote could theoreticolly free up the equivolent
of one courtroom to be used by onother judge for processing motters requiring o
courtroom, This would indicote on equivolent onnuol sovings of 572,000, (See the
onolysis of the cost qnd the volue of o courtroom qs presented eorlier in this chopter
when discussing night court),
The onnuol cost engoging o Mogistrote to provide orroignments is estimoted ot
$.l00,000, The Mogistrote would utilize spoce thot is otherwise olreody provided in the
spoce progrom.
Additionol sovings could be reolized by ovoiding the need to tronsport currently 14
persons in-custody per doy to the courtroom for orroignment increosing Io 25 tronsports
per doy in the future, There ore 8,728 in-custody tronsporls per yeor to the District Court.
This overoges obout 35 per doy, With 14 being tronsported for orroignment, this
indicqtes thot orroignment represents 4Oo/" of oll tronsfers to the District Court, In 2006
there were 13,728 persons in-custody tronsported to the courfs with 5,000 of them going
to the Reno Justice Court ond the Sporks Municipol Court buildings ond 8,728 going to
the 2nd District Court,
There ore certoinly some economies to scole by reducing the number of individuols
tronsported to courls, but it is doubtful thot it is o proportionote relqtionship os there is o
certoin fixed cost required to mointoin the required frequency of tronsport between
detention ond court focilities on q route thot includes the District Court, Justice Court,
Reno Municipol Courl, ond the Sporks Municipol Court, However, tf 4O7" of those
tronsported to the District Court where eliminoted, then the totol number of persons
tronsported would be reducedto 25% (3,491 divided by 13,728),
Cunently there is l8 stoff engoged in the in-custody tronsport operotion, This is forecost
to increose to 28 stoff of community build-out, A reduction of 25"/" of this stoff would
represent on overoge of six positions over the timefrome of onolysis, At on overoge
lobor cost of $26 per hour, six full-time positions would hove on onnuol solory of 5324,480
(526x2,080x6),
Poge 94 of 356

The net potentiol cost reduction by implementing 100% video orroignment in the District
Court is the sum of o sovings of $72,000 per yeor for one courtroom thot would not be
required, $324,480 for reduced Sheriff tronsit stoff, ond o cost increose of S.|00,000 for o
full-time Mogistrote, The net potentiol onnuol cost sovings is estimoted of $296,480, We
believe this olternotive is well worfh exploring even if it is only implemented on o portiol
bosis given thot defendonts hove the choice of o foce-to-foce oppeoronce ond
judges moy on occosion request o foce-to-foce oppeoronce for certoin defendonts.
Poge 95 of 356

C. Courtroom Ulilizqlion
A one-week survey of oll District Court ond Justice Court courtrooms wos conducted in
July 2007. In oddition to identifying the level of utilizotion of courtrooms for vorious types
of octivities, the consultont teom identified the number of spectotors within the
courtroom when it wos utilized, fhe presence ond number of individuols in o jury, the
presence ond number of individuols in-custody, the number of porliciponts in the well
including the judiciol officer, ond, of the some time, the number of individuols thot were
woiting outside reosonobly odjocent to the courtroom.
From this onolysis, which wqs conducted seporotely for the Fomily Couri ond Generol
Jurisdiction Divisions of the District Court, ond the Justice Court, we were then oble to
moke some observotions regording overoge occuponcy level ond copocity
requirements. Following is o summory of the findings ond observotions,
Over o two-week timefrome there wos on overoge of eight observotions mode per doy
for eoch courtroom, lf the courtroom wos octivoted there would then be 80
observotions for eoch courtroom. In octuolity, there were substontiolly fewer
observotions mode becouse mony of the courtrooms were not open the full eight hours
per doy, For exomple - for the District Courf - Generol Jurisdiction, which included nine
courts, there could hove been 720 observotions. However, there were only 500
recorded instonces of o courtroom when it wos open during this survey,
1) Courtroom Utilizotion - ls o meosure of the extent to which o courtroom os o
resource in the odministrotion of justice contributes to the odjudicotion of o cose,
There ore two types of courtroom utilizotion: direct utilizotion ond indirect utilizotion,
Direct courtroom utilizotion is the equivolent of occuponcy, lt is o meosure of the
omount of time the courtroom is physicolly occupied by the court. Indirect
courtroom utilizotion is o meosure of the occurrences when hoving the courtroom
ovoiloble ond scheduled to be used contributed to moving o cose forword in the
odjudicotion process,
2) Courtroom Copocitv ond Porticipotion
DISTRICT COURT _ GENERAL JURISDICTION
Spectotors - The drug court hod o few instonces with 60 spectotors within the
courfroom (stonding room only), For the entire Generol Jurisdiction there were 98
observotions (of o totol of obout 500) where there were o number of spectotors,
Overoll there were l2 instonces where there were more thon 20 spectotors, Other
thqn the drug court, the lorgest number of spectotors in ony one court of one time
wos 46 spectotors on one occosion,
Jury - There were seven observotions of the presence of o jury, This wos limited to
two of the eight courts ond centered oround o six-doy timefrome when it oppeored
o jury triol wos being conducted.
Poge 96 of 356

In-Custodv - There were up to '18 individuqls in-custody simultoneously within o
number of courtrooms (usuolly in the eorly morning) for orroignment purposes, lt
wos o frequent occurrence, There were never more thon l3 in-custody individuols
becouse the number of individuols simultoneously brought into the courtroom is
generolly limited to the number of seots in the jury box,
Porticiponts - There were from one to 12 porticiponts in the well of ony point in time
with lorger numbers of individuols present during orroignment, The overoge
oppeored to be six individuols,
Woiting Areo - For oll of the observotions there were on overoge of seven
individuols woiting outside of eoch courtroom. The exception to this wos o number
of instonces directly outside the drug courf of 50 to 60 persons woiting for the
courtroom to open, Other thon the drug court the moximum number of individuols
ever wqiting outside of the courtroom wos 35,
DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY DIVISION
Spectotors - There were on overoge of less thon six spectotors in the courtrooms
during the observotions, The highest numbers recorded were .|0, I l, ond 15
soectotors in one instonce eoch,
Jurv - There wos no presence of jury in ony of the courtrooms during ony of the
observotions,
ln-Custodv - There wos no evidence of onyone in-custody in ony of the courtrooms
during the observotions.
Porticioonts - There were from three to seven podiciponts in the well during the
observotions, The overoge wos obout four,
Woiting Areo - There wos one instonce with 22 individuols woiting outside of the
courtroom eorly in the morning, The next highest wos l6 individuols, The overoges
of oll of the observotions were six persons woiting outside the Fomily Courirooms,
JUSTICE COURT
Spectotors - The highest number of spectotors within o courtroom were 35 ond 39,
There were 2l instonces of the 400 observotions where more thon 20 individuols
were in the courtroom,
Jury - There were no observotions of o presence of o jury in the Justice Courtrooms
during the two weeks,
In-Custodv - There were os mony os six persons in-custody in o courtroom on three
observqtions,
Poge 97 of 356

Porticiponts - There were from one to six porficiponts in the well with the overoge
being four,
Woiting Areo - The ronge of individuols woiting outside of the Justice Courtrooms
wos from three to 35 when the court wos in session, This qcknowledges thot when
the court wos not in session there were no people woiting outside the courtroom,
The highest observotions were individuol occurrences of 25, 28, 31, 32, ond 35
individuols, olmost olwoys in the eorly morning, The overoge number of persons
woiting outside the Justice Courlrooms when the court wos octive wos .l0,
D. Spoce Requiremenls
From this observed doto we con develop some generol conclusions regording the
copocity of courtrooms, the ollocotion of jury rooms, the need for direct proximity to incustody
holding, ond porticipont woiting oreo requirements,
DISTRICT COURT _ GENERAL JURISDICTION
Spectotor Copocitv - We believe it is oppropriote to provide courlrooms with o
copocity for 56 seots, os there were o number of instonces where this number of
seots could hove been utilized, Courlroom seoting typicolly comes in rows of seven
seots (code reloted) on eoch side of o center oisle, Common couriroom
configurotions con usuolly provide copocities for 14 (one row), 28 (two rows), 42
(three rows), ond 56 spectotors (four rows),
Jurv Accommodotions - Although the doto does not indicote the need for jury
occommodotions for every court or even every other court, we believe it is likely
thot the scheduling of courtroom motfers, to minimize deloy should require the
provision of one fully-equipped jury room for eoch two or three Generol Jurisdiction
Courtrooms ond eoch courtroom should hove secondory occess to o minimum of
two jury rooms on the floor without hoving to leove the privote circulotion oreo.
Eoch Generol Jurisdiction Courtroom should be provided with juror
occommodotions,
In-Custody Holding - Every Generol Jurisdiction Courtroom moy heor criminol
motters ond needs to hove direct secured occess to in-custody holding with verticol
tronsportotion provided from holding oreos ond in-toke ond solly porfs locoted in
the porking level, Unless the court divides into o civil ond criminol colendor, oll
Generol Jurisdiction Courtrooms should hove direct proximity to secured in-custody
holdlng,
Woiting Areos - Woiting oreos outside of the courtrooms will be extensive,
porticulorly in the morning session, for Generol Jurisdiction ond occommodotions for
on overoge of 30 persons woiting to enter eoch courtroom should be
occommodoted odjocent to eoch courtroom, Not oll of this occommodotion
needs to be provided in fixed seoting, The overoge woiting requirement will be
obout seven individuols per courtroom ond o minimum seoted copocity of 15
persons should be provided,
Poge 98 of 356

DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY DIVISION
Soectotor Copocitv - lt hos very rore thot more thon ten spectotors were found in o
Fomily Court, Typicolly the Fomily Court could operote with one row of 14 spectotor
seots, The current progrom provides copocities for greoter thon this, Some
economies to scqle could be implemented ond the Fomily Court courtrooms
reduced in size.
Jurv Accommodotions - On rore occosions the Fomily Court moy hove o jury triol
ond it is recommended thot one jury room be provided for the entirety of the Fomily
Court, At leost one of the cunent six ond in the future two of the future l8 Fomily
Court/Heoring Rooms should be provided os jury copoble,
ln-Custody Holdino - On very rore occosions the Fomily Court will heor o motfer thot
requires the presence of o person in-custody, Direct proximity of two of the Fomily
Courts to in-custody holding ond secured verticol tronsit should be provided, This, of
course, ossumes flexible scheduling ond the obility to ossign judiciol officers to
different courtrooms depending upon the mqtfer to be heord, i.e. occommodoting
o judiciol proceeding with q person in-custody ond/or the presence of o jury in the
one or two courtrooms so equipped.
Woitino Areos - Woiting oreos should occommodote l6 individuols, both seoted ond
stonding per court/heoring room, The overoge, however, wos opproximotely five
individuols,
JUSTICE COURT
Spectotor Copocity - The Justice Court frequently hos o number of spectotors ond
con justify four rows of seoting ond o totol copocity for 42 spectotors,
Jurv Accommodotions - Occosionolly there will be more thon one jury iriol of o time.
With future growth levels estimoting nine or ten Justice Courts, we recommend
providing two thot ore jury copoble ond two jury rooms ossuming thot motters
requiring the presence of o jury con be scheduled for o jury equipped courtroom
ond thot oll Justice Court officers hove equol secured occess to the courtrooms,
In-Custody Holding - Assuming flexible ossignment of judges to courtrooms, ten
Justice Courtrooms should be oble to be served with two in-custody holding oreos
between poirs of courtrooms so four courtrooms ore in-custody equipped,
Woiting Areos- Woiting oreos should be similor to thot provided for the District Courf
- Generol Jurisdiction Division with occommodotions for o moximum of 30
individuols both seoted ond stonding odjocent to eoch courtroom,
Certqin building configurotions moy occommodote shored use of centrol woiting oreos
outside multiple courtrooms (double loqded corridor configurotions), This con provide
Poge 99 of 356

flexibility ond economies to scole ond reduce overoll spoce requirements from building
configurotions thot hove o single looded corridor or o lineor orientotion of courtrooms.
1) Courtroom Stondords
Courtroom stondords developed in the 1999 Study ond their reloted spoce ollocotions
were utilized in this study. Those stondords ore documented in Appendix B, The
ollocotion of spoce ond sizes for the courtrooms os found in the dotobose ore os
follows:
DISTRICT COURT - GENERAL JURISDICTION
To support 16 judges ond two senior judges, o totol of l8 equivolent judiciol positions,
the dotobose provides l2 full-service courts ond two heoring rooms, The l4 judiciol
proceeding rooms ore ollocoled l2jury rooms, We believe this could be reduced to six
jury rooms os long os there is secured occess from oll courtrooms to oll jury rooms,
Adequote circulotion ond public oreos occommodote qn overoge of 56 spectotors
per couriroom ond 30 persons woiting outside,
DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY DIVISION
The Fomily Division is provided l2 judges ond six mogistrotes for o totol of l8 judiciol
officers. They, in turn, ore ollocoied I I courtrooms with on overoge seoting copocity of
42 individuols ond two heoring rooms, Thus, there ore 14 judiciol proceeding rooms
ovoiloble for l8 equivolent judiciol officers, We believe the courtrooms os progrommed
which overoge 1,400 NSF ore oversized ond the copocity could be reduced to 28
individuols (possibly even 14 spectotors), which would ollow the overoge courlroom size
to be 1,2O0 net squore feet, The dotqbose ollocotes one jury room to be shored by the
entire Fomily Court,
JUSTICE COURT
The Justice Courl is o high-volume operotion ond the ten forecost judiciol positions ore
provided ten identicol courtrooms, We recommend thot two of these courirooms be
configured os jury equipped ond might wont to be slightly lorger thon the other eight
courtrooms, One or possibly two jury rooms should be provided for the Justice Court,
The jury rooms could double os o heoring room ond be used os conference rooms for
the judiciol officers if locoted olong public circulotion with on entronce from the privote
judiciol/stoff circulotion.
Poge 100of356

7. FACILIry INVENTORY
Poge 101 of356

Poge 102of356

7. FACILIW INVENTORY
The existing focilities currently consist of the Historic Courthouse, locoted of 75
Court Street, of opproximotely 40,144 net squore feet; The 1965 Addition, directly
to the west of the Historic Courthouse, of 42,129 net squore feet; ond the Joil
locoted directly to the west of the .|965 Addition, fronting on Sierro Street, which
consists of .l6, 293 net squore feet, We hove olso considered One South Sierro
Street, which contoins three levels plus o bosement, but excludes the Mills Lone
Justice Center, The totol oreo of this focility is 70,010 net squore feet,
Exhibit 7,.| indicotes the current focilities ond the net squore footoge summory os
well os the odjocent vocont Pioneer Site of 2.79 ocres,
Exhibit 7,2 outlines the current spoce inventory totoling 168,576 squore feet,
Exhibits 7,3,7.4,7,5,7 ,6 andT,7 eoch contoin level-by-level floor plons of eoch of
the existing buildings ond Appendix D moy be referenced for enlorged floor
plons of eoch of those oreos,
Poge 103 of356

t
1\
ts
e
I
xul
e,
f
3t,
e,
o FzEI
z
F
IJ
t!
tL
ul
e,
=@
CN
F
ul
z F
=o
t!
F
zul
e,
e,
=o
OJ q
f
(7) e
€_l
4*@
l r.,- .b.r 3 *
y.z O o
ol(.) =cn Ez sz

EXHIBIT 7-2
WASHOE COUNTY COURTS COMPTEX
CURRENT SPACE INVENTORY
ONE SOUTH SIERRA
First Floor 20,844 sf
Second Floor 24,583 sf
Third Floor 24,583 sf
Subtotol 70,010 sf
I965 ADDITION
JAIL
First Floor 10,.l52 sf
Second Floor 10,659 sf
Third Floor 10,659 sf
Fourth Floor 10,659 sf
First Floor 5,393 sf
Second Floor 5,450 sf
Third Floor 5,450 sf
HISTORIC
COURTHOUSE
Bosement
First Floor
13,748 sf
.l3,250
sf
Second Floor 13,146 sf
Subtotol 98,566 sf
TOTAL | 68,576 sf
Poge 105of356

z
J
otrl
ts
cn
o zt-
I Xul
(Dl E
rlJ2
-l
=l
Ul
=l = El
:El cn,
xl
tril 6
a
IW
6.06
i;E)-9 =!^
-_:.:Ei
dl
F6!
aa
E#J7,
I EEF,'P Y
l=Eix;l
2f.6:6*
trnwilntr
l33UlS nOStlYU
r33ur8 VUUetS 'S
I
!)
n\
n
..1

z Joul
F
Tl 6
F\l O
El z
+l -E
xt x
IJ|| rJ
d,
o
oJ t!F
.n,
ul
l!
a)
t
at
c
P,E
hiJx
a7!r9!
! ,= ! !
7Ztil
nnronn
E
r33U1S nOANTVC
L
I

z
J
o-
EI
F
91 6
F\l O tsl ol z
=
=l 2
xl x
ull ul
e,
o
-l t!
o
z
o
O lr|
(n
E
ai
e
o
".4
9,3
t-
'J:=F
-.9JG?
3 !A-5E =ta6i
tlr|ilirNr!l
ntrffiil4
rlaurs tosxlvu
"1[milJ
;] L ,,,,
lfSHIS YUU3TS'S
U
lrl
E
F
q
F
G
t
o
€
(Y) 'o
o
@o 0)
n
(J

z
Ioul
F
?t 6
F\l O
=l z
+l -a
XI u|| X
ur
i^,.!
aZ;?
E;i
zc,o5gd =EiE={
i
c.'j *
nntrmtrm

z
Ioul
F
tl 6
F\l O
=l z
fl -*e
xt x
lrII IJ
e
o JT!
-F e
D
o II
E^.!*.
,.i)z
iiul
EE:2,'EPi
zi;aiad
EDZEi.=
NNNEtril
ui
a zaaa
YAfr
5=
oo
-F F.-
Et
dg
reScrs nosiltvu
o
0)
ort
f_

8. FACILIry EVALUATION
Poge 1ll of356

Poge 112of356

8. FACILIW EVALUATION
To moximize the utilizotion of existing spoce ond minimize new construction required to
support 45 equivolent judiciol positions forecost to support community build-out, it is
necessory to thoroughly evoluote existing focilities to determine their copocity for
renovotion, exponsion, ond continued utilizotion throughout the plonning timefrome,
This Study conducted o number of onolyses to determine the feosibility of utilizing
existing focilities, This chopter will summorize the findings in the following oreos:
A. One South Sierrq Exponsion
li hos long been thought thot One South
exponsion, To test the feosibility of being
conducted onolyses in the following oreos:
l, Structurol Evoluotion
Sierro wos designed to ollow verticol
oble to expond One South Sierro we
We performed o review of the existing structurol drowings, inspected the existing
focility, ond opplied the subsequent code chonges to the existing design. With
those foctors in mind, we hove colculoted thot we con odd two odditionol floors
to One South Sierro, with minimized intrusion into the existing spoces to reinforce
the existing structure,
2. Elevotor Copocity
Bosed on the oddition of two odditionol floors, we would be required to qdd two
3,500 pound, 350 feet per minute troction elevotors to the focility to enhonce the
verticol circulotion ond moke it odequote for o building of this size ond use. The
two existing hydroulic possenger elevotors would need to be modified to the
some type.
3, Mechonicol Copocity
After evoluotion of the mechonicol, plumbing, ond fire protection systems, it
oppeors thot these systems moy be modified ond exponded to occommodote
the oddition of two more floors, This will require the oddition of more mechonicol
equipment which moy be roof mounted due to lock of sufficient spoce
elsewhere,
4. Electricol System Evoluotion
We hove evoluoted the power lighting, telephone, doto, ond fire olorm systems
ond find thot they will oll be oble to be exponded to enoble us to odd two
odditionol floors to One South Sierro.
5, Accessibility ond Code Complionce
Poge 1.|3of356

The current focility occommodotes the disqbled since it wos constructed under
the recent occessibility guide lines, these ore minor code violotions, the most
notoble being ihe opporent lock of o three hour fire seporotion between
buildings, This con be eosily corrected by use of olternotive design methods,
Poge 1.l4of356

8.A.1 - Structurol Evoluotion Report
Prepored by John A. Mortin &Associotes
Poge 115of356

Poge 1.|6of356

f)ctobcr 26.2007
lrlr. Todd Lankenau
Col laborativc Design Stutlio
9444 Double R Blvd., Suite 13
Reno. NV 895:l
Subj cct:
Dear Todd:
Washoc County'' Llourts Complex
.TA\'lA NV .lob No.6548.71
,ffik g615ti,,
&'Associotes
ichn A- Mcrri;rr. S F
johr A. lvior:in, .lr , S F
(irergory t 'i.jr.roi', S.i
Sleve lrrr,rj{t:r. 5.t
F,-rgr.lrr l. i)crior;
C)ur scopc'u'as to dcterminc hou. ntarrJ' additional levels ryay_b-e^ ?q+g,l^lq the existing
coufthousc. The couflhouse was engineersd in 1994 per the l99l LIBC for 7 levcls, At the time
of'constructiol. 3 levels wcre build.- We based our design on dra\.\'ings datc-d March 29, I 994
u.hich indicate they were tbr bid onty.
(-)ur preliminary analysis was based upon the 2006 IBC:. We checked sevcral columns, footings
arrd one latcral lianrc to detcrrnine hor.v many levels can be added under the IBC code. Bascd
Llpon our prelinrinary desigrr, it appears that two additional lloors rvith a roof may be added to the
cxisting structurc.
A nrorc detailcd analysis rvill be needed to verify that all lateral elenrents compiy rvith the
current IBC code. The hrace and beam connections which are part ol thc lateral systent may
have tq he upgradecl. At this timc. it appears two additional ll

8.A.2 - Elevqtor Copocity Report
Prepored by Otis Elevqtor Compony
Poge 1lBof356

Poge 119of356

Buildinq Data
Floor #5
Floor #4
F]-oor #3
Floor #2
Floor #1
Floor #B
Tota1s
Glossarv
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
ELEVATOR TRAFFIC STUDY
ONE SOUTH SIERRA
175 Persons
l-75 Persons
175 Persons
L75 Persons
Lobby Area
Restricted Access
15 ' _0/'
L5'-Oo
L5'-On
18', -0',
L2'-3n
700 Persons 75'-3"
Lof2
Capacity - Thre rated capacity of the elevator cab in pounds,
as dictated by the State of Nevada Elevator Code.
Speed The maximurn speed of the elevator cab in feet per
rninute.
Number - The nrrmber of elevators in the grouP analysS-s.
Interval Thre average time, expressed in seconds, for an
elevator to leave the main J-anding during peak traffic
periods. The maximum for a tlpical courthouse building is 60
seconds during hearry two-way traffic conditions.
Poge 120of356
2of2

HandJ-ing TLre percentage of ttre buiJ.ding population w}.ichr
car-r be moved by the elevator group in a five nr-inute peak
traffic period. The nuinimum for a tlpical courthouse
building is L2.0 during hear4r two-way traffic conditions.
Miscellaneou.s
The traffic study assumes that threre will be an averagle of
2t persons traveling to/from each floor during peak traffic
periods. For traffic study purposes, this equals a
population of 175 persons per fJ-oor.
The traffic study also assumes that the ?rBr' level as a
restricted area and wiJ-J- onJ-y be accessed interrnittentJ-y by
building personnel.
Conclusions
OPTIMUM ELEVATOR TRAFFIC STUDY
Capacity
3500
Speed
350
Number Interva]-
34.2
Hand].inq
t2 -o
The elevator study will provide intervals and handling with
the recommended design parameters during peak traffic
perj-ods.
Poge 12.l of356

8.A.3 - Mechonicol Copocity Report
Prepored by CR Engineering
Poge 122ot356

Poge 123 of356

ffiw ffiF-&ffi$,*€ffiffiffi&&qffi
1'4* chrr-r rri cr: I E n i ii r-i *eri n g Crf n s u I t.i n t
5595 F,:rr_jtv A,.ue., .lr_rit* 4OJ
F.*r"s,li'J 9?FlL'!
Pl' rtr tt'. 77 5.92t.1 r 1 ? F ax: 7 7 5.82t,. 1 91 8
1 S. Sierra Street Additional Floors Feasibilitv Studv
For
Collaborative Desisn Studio
Owner:
Washoe County Public Works Department
1001 E. Ninth Street
P.O. Box 11L30
Reno. I\tV 89520
hepared by:
CR Engineering
5595 Equity Ave., Suite 400
Reno. NV 89502
Project Number: 036007
November 1. 2001
Poge 124of356

SCOPE OF' INVESTIGATION
The extent of this investigation includes reviewing the reproduced plans of the existing building
(dated l0/04/1993) and the reproduced plans of the Mills Lane Courthouse (dated 0310Y2m4).
There were also conversations with Washoe County Facility Management reviewing the current
system operation.
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING BUILDING SYSTEMS
The building is currently 3 floors at 34,000 square feet per floor with a parking garage in the
basement. The mechanical system at I South Sierra is a chilled water system with air handlers
on each floor and hot water reheat at the fan powered air terminal units in each zone. The chilled
water is provided by the Mills Lane Courthouse chilled water plant. The hot water system comes
from 2 boilers located in the mechanical mezzanine at I South Sierra.
The total output capacity of the existing hot water plant is 2,100 MBH. The existing hot water
plant consists of 2 firebox hot water boilers with output capacities of 750 MBH and 1,350 MBH.
The existing pumps are sized for a flow of 210 gallons per minute. The hot water system is
piped in a primary-secondary arrangement.
The total capacity of the existing chilled water plant is 800 tons (9,600 MBH). The chilled water
plant consists of two (2) 300 ton chillers and two (2) 200 ton chillers. Due to the chilled water
main pipe sizes and control sequence only three (3) chillers can run simultaneously. The pumps
are sized to handle a maximum of 2,200 gallons per minute. The chilled water system is piped in
a variable primary arrangement.
The current plumbing system is sized based on a flush valve system. The existing domestic
water line is a 3-inch type L copper line entering ttre building on the first floor- The water line is
sized for a maximum of 670 water supply fixture units. The domestic hot water is supplied by
multiple electric water heaters located throughout the building. The waste main is an 8-inch cast
iron line that leaves the building below the basement. The waste. line can carry 2,640 drainage
fixture units.
The current fire protection system is a dry pipe system that provides protection for the entire
building.
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
The following is a general sumrnarization of the mechanical, plumbing, and fire protection
systems' ability to accommodate 2,3, or 4 more floors of similar size and usage as the existing
second and third floor, as well as identify potential problem areas.
The heating hot water system along with a few other systems will need modification regardless
of how many extra floors are added- Using 25 BTUs per square foot to estimate the heating load
the existing building is using all of the 2,100 MBH that the current boiler plant is supplying.
Poge 125of356

The boiler plant will need more capacity to accommodate the proposed additional floors. If the
heating hot water plant is modified, the existing boiler room is not large enough to add another
boiler. Therefore, the existing boilers will have to be replaced with higher capacity boilers of
smaller footprint. The hot water heating pumps will also need to be changed to accommodate
any additional floors. If the hot water plant is modified the. 5-inch hot water main will need to
be upsized to a 6-inch line to handle any additional floors. Otherwise, the additional floors will
have to include their own heating hot water plant.
The current chilled water system serving Mills Lane Courthouse and I South Sierra Courthouse
is cunently using 600 tons- An additional 2 floors will add 200 more tons of load to ttre systern,
making the total system load 800 tons. The chilled water pumps are able to handle the flow rate
of 2 additional floors- The chilled water pipe from the central plant to I South Sierra will need to
be upsized from a S-inch line to a 6-inch line. Adding 3 or 4 floors will require the sequence of
operations to enable the four existing chillers to run simultaneously. The chilled water main will
have to be upsized to a lO-inch pipe from an 8-inch pipe. The chilled water pipe from the central
plant to I South Sierra will need to be upsized from a 5-inch line to a 6-inch line.
Each additional floor will require their own air handlers, because the existing air handlers are
designed to condition their respective floors only. The existing outside air hood needs to be
extended to the new roof and a chase will be needed in order to connect the hood to the existing
ductwork. The District Court #6 rooftop unit needs to be relocated to the new roof and a chase
provided to connect the ductwork. The existing fan coil units in the elevator equipment room
may need to be upsized depending on the new elevator equipment loads. With 3 or 4 more
floors, the stairwells will have to be pressurizedper the 2003 Intemational Building Code, 2003
Intemational Fire Code, and NFPA, which states that "Exits of a building that serves stories
where the floor surface is located more than 75 feet above the lowest leve1 of fire vehicle access
or more than 30 feet below the, level of exit discharge serving such floor levels shall be a smoke
proof enclosure or pressurized stairway"-
The existing cold water service should be upgraded to a 4-inch service from a 3-inch service to
accommodate any expansion. The existing cold water service is sized to handle the current
usage only. The 3-inch domestic cold water risers are sufficient in size to handle 2 additional
floors. The domestic cold water risers will need to be upsized to a 4-inch line to accommodate 3
or 4 additional floors. The service pressure of 60 psi is sufficientfor 2 additional floors. Adding
3 or 4 floors will require the domestic water line to have a booster pump to ensure sufficient
pressure to operate the plumbing fixtures. New domestic water heaters will be required for any
expansion, since the existing electric water heaters are designed to only handle the current
demand.
The existing waste lines are sufficient in size to add 2 additional floors. The existing waste line
is an S-inch main leaving the building with multiple 4-inch risers. Each of the 4-inch risers can
handle a maximum of 216 drainage fixture units. With an additional 3 or 4 more floors, the
existing 8-inch sewer main is sufficient in size. Depending on the number of additional fixtures
and layout of the new restrooms, ttre 4-inch risers might have to be upsized to a S-inch line.
Poge 126of356

The existing dry pipe fire protection system fire risers have enough capacity and pressure to
extend an additional 2 floors. However, adding 3 or 4 floors will require a booster pump so that
the upper floors will have enough pressure to operate ttre fire protection system properly.
CONCLUSIONS
Mechanical and nlumbine
The existing I Soutlr Sierra Courthouse mechanical, plumbing, and fire protection systems can
be modified to accommodate the additional 2, 3 or 4 more floors. The heating hot water plant
will have to be modified or a new system will have to be installed in order to support the
additional floors. The chilled water plant sequence of operation and pipe sizes will have to be
upsized to accommodate the additional floors. The 3-inch domestic water service will need to be
upsized to a 4-inch line to accommodate the additional floors- Depending on the number of
floors that are to be added, a domestic water booster pump may need to be added to the system.
A new domestic hot water system will be needed for any additional floors. The existing dry pipe
fire protection system risers have enough capacity for addi[ional floors. However, depending on
the number of additional floors added, a fire booster pump will be needed.
Poge 127 of356

8.A.4 - Electricol Sysfem Evqluotion Report
Prepored by PK Electricol Inc.
Poge 128 of356

Poge 129 of356

ELEGTRIGAL SYSTEM EVALUATION
OF
Gourts Building
Number { South Sierra Street
Reno, NV
Washoe Gounty Gourts Gomplex
October 23r 2OOT
ffi tttgt*lf,nt- ilEB.
ffiLHC?*lcAt- Hffi*1Kffiffi,ftilf|#
,g',tt'*,; tr*b"* *,#?.r', {;i) I, {:#ilr$'}
fu'ti1 x*ry* it*;+* il}rsu# b.*tt++ *1 + f{.*rarl,NV &{**X1
w " ?'t' li.*!ttt.!;${}3{} u € : V 7'"t -#7{l l|t} 3#
Poge 130 of356

General:
E lectrica I Engineer's I nspection a nd Eva luation
Number 1 South Sierra Street, Reno, NV; Washoe County Courts Complex
October 23,2OO7
Washoe County is consideringthe proposal to add more stories to the existing courts buildingat
Number l South Sierra Street, which consequently willadd extra square footage. The purpose for
conductingthis engineering inspection and review of the existing building electrical systems is to
evaluate the impact on these systems by adding new space, and to deterrnine lf these systems have
adequate capacityfor supplyingthe increased load. The fire alarm, phone/data, main electrical selice,
electrical distribution systems and standby generator were visually inspected on the site. These systems
were further reviewed by referring to the original as-built construction d rawings,
Building staff from the engineering/maintenance department were interviewed and contributed
information to this report based on their personal knowledge a nd observations of the electrical systerns.
The Architect noted that the proposed increase in the height would result in the building being classified
as a high rise building, and become subjectto such codes. A mention was made concerningthe possible
reclassification of the subject building and the adjacent building, as to theirfire ratings, and the possible
requirernent to provide upgraded fire separation walls. These changes, or otherfire resistant
construction considerations rnay include the installation of water storage tanks and fire pumps, but an
exact understanding of these requirements is not currently available.
Conclusio n:
lncluding the normally expected improvements required for remodeling, the existing electrical systems
are of suff icient capacity and of satisfactory configuration to continue to be utilized following the
addition of extra stories and square footage, as presently proposed,
Find ings and Recommendations:
1. Fire Alarm
The fire alarm system is new, having replaced the original, with greatly increased capacity. There
currently is space available in this panelto accommodate the additional components needed by
addingthe proposed square footage. The system will require sorne modifications to meet the
high rise building code, possibly requiring an interconnection with the adjacent buildingfire
alarm systern. There is space available in this panelto accommodate the needed extra fire alarm
electronics.
Poge 131 of356

Building staff engineers indicated that this system was recentlytested and found to be in
operating condition, about two weeks ago. They also said that the systern already has a voice
annunciatorfeaturewhich is requiredforuse in high rise rated buildings, and can be extended
into the proposed areas.
The fire alarm remote annunciator panel(s), particularly those utilized by the City Fire
Department, will require replacementwith new display(s)showingthe changed building
configuration,
2. Phone/Data
3,
4,
The existing standby power supply batteries in the fire alarm panel will require up-grading to
handle the additional alarm notification devices and modules.
The Phone/Data rooms are currently positioned above one-another on each floor, and this
configuration rnay be readily continued, as such, to serve the proposed new floors above.
The number of incomingtelephone lineswillneed to be inventoried to determine if the
telephone company will need to provide additional lines to serue the expanded areas. This may
require that additional space and seruice connections be added to the main telephone seruice
entrance equipment,
Electrica I power systerns
Themainefectricalserviceentranceis3000amp,2TT/480vac,3phase,4wire. Buildingstaff
engineers indicated thatthe existing HVAC chillerwas reconnected tothe electricalservice of
the new building next door, thereby reducing the load on the subject building electrical seruice.
The Sierra Pacific Power Co. records show thatthe presentyearly maximum high demand load
on this service has been 363 KW, which calculates as 437 amps, The existing main electrical
service is considered adequate to supply the building including the proposed expanded floors,
To accommodate the proposed remodeling the existing electrical distribution would be
extended to the new floors. This would require sorne modification of the existing switch boards
to add feeders to serve the new floors and for additional HVAC requirements. There are existing
spare electricalfeeder spaces in the main distribution panel, including empty spare conduits to
the upper floor, previously installed for future additions, simplifying the proposed remodeling.
Standby Generator
TheexistingstandbygeneratorisT50KW,2TT/480vac,3phase,4wire. Buildingstaffengineers
indicated that the standby electrical power supply automatic transfer switch and generator
circuits have been modified since the original construction. The standby generator is now
sharingthe back-up power load in both the adjacent building next door, and the subject building
(but is no longer connected to the load of the main electrical service). They indicated that the
Poge 132 of356

existing standby generator presently provides power for only two elevators and some
emergency power panels in the subject buildingand sirnilar loads in the adjacent building. This
configuration is satisfactory to carry the existing loads and the new proposed stories, lf a f urther
increase in electrical load is to be imposed by addingfire pumping capacity to the standby
system, the adeq uacy of th is system should be re-eva luated ,
Poge 133 of356

B. Courl Slreet Troffic Study
l. Court Street Abondonment Feosibility Study,
Closure of Court Street
To occommodote contiguous exponsion of the Historic Courfhouse ond provide
one security perimeter for oll courts occupying the Historic Courlhouse ond its
exponsion, it is necessory to close or reroute Court Street, Significont sovings in
onnuol operoting costs con be qchieved by only hoving to stoff one secured
entronce to the Courts Comolex, lf Court Street connot be closed or rerouted, then
new construction of o portion of the Pioneer site would necessitote o seporote
security entronce stoffed by on equivolent of five full-time positions.
A review of the utilities found in Couri Street yields numerous existing utilities under
the street ond in the right of woy, including o lorge storm sewer which will need to
be relocoted if Court Street is closed,
A review of troffic potterns ond troffic flow reveols thot it is not desirqble from o
troffic perspective to close Court Street ond eliminote the eost / west connections
throughout downtown Reno. This is evidenced by the Court Street Abondonment
Feosibility Study performed by Fehr & Peers in section 8,8 of this report,
While troffic is one of the considerotions in the closure of Court Street, there ore
other considerotions which moy weigh heovily on the finol decision, Those hove to
do with the security of the entire perimeter of the Courts Focilities, the public spqce
ond Civic Center otmosphere creoted by the pork-like setting if Court Street is
qbondoned ond in its ploce o plozo were to be constructed with woter feotures,
orfwork, etc, We believe thot the importonce of the Courts Complex os on integrol
component of the downtown Civic Center ond its function os o public gothering
ploce would be greotly enhonced by the closure, We do ocknowledge thot this is
not the recommendotion of the Troffic Study itself, but we do believe thot there ore
other considerotions which weigh equolly upon or greoter thon the considerotion of
troffic olone,
Poge 134of356

8.8 - Abondonment Feosibility Study
Prepored by Fehr & Peers
Poge 135of356

Poge 136of356

October 24.2407
ldr Tocitl Lankenau, Piincrpa!
CrdiaLrorative Desigri Studio
944.i Souble R Btvd. Srrite B
Reno, Nevada 89521
Fi,t-ri.. rV ii.iir.S
T;iit5r,u:i tAl.rJ I .c t 5u!lrrilis
Re.' Court Street Abandonmesrf Feastfrifify Sfucly
llear F.4r. Lankenau:
Tfris letter repori discusses the feasibility of acar:doning Court Street belvreerr Sierra Straet and
Virginia Street io rrehicle li'afftc io provide a pedestrian only corridor, Tlre goal of the
abanrlolrrneni',r.,ould be ta facilitate pedestrian rnovcmcni betweerr ihe parcel orr ':-he south side of
Court Street between Sierra Street and Virginia Street and tlre existing Court Cornplex buildrngs
to tlte north. This lelter report presents daily tratfic volurne data, poteniial impacts to vehicle
circulaliorr, and inrpacts to future year development duc to abandoning Court Streel between
Slerra Street and Virginia Street.
EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK
Coutl Streef - Court Street is an east-wesl two lane roadway that exiends from Lee Avenue to
Holcomb Avenue (it changes names io State Street east of V;rginia Street), Court Street provides
one of only two eastlwest links south of the Truckee Rrver behveen Sierra Street and Center
Street and is important to the functiorr of the Sierra StreeUCenter Street one-way couplei system.
ln addilion, this roaiway is one of few roadways that have connectivity to the easuwest betvyeen
Arlington Avenue and Holcomb Avenue. There are lwo srgna!ized intersections within the Court
SireeUState Street Corridor, at Sierra Street and Virginia Street.
Court Street has on-slreet meterei parking on both sirJes of the street. These parking spaces are
highly utilized. The parking adiacent to the Courts Complex is primarily utilized 5y visitors to the
Courts Cornplex.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Tnffic Volumes
We performed machine traffic counts on Court Street midway between Siena Street and Virginia
Street October 2 - October 4, 2007 to delermine the ciaily traffic volume. The raw vehicle axle
count data is attached to this letter The daiiy and peak hour traffic volumes on Couri Street
between Siena Street and Virginia Street are dispiayed in Table 1.
@Nvsssoii,;@ 'urtr'w.lefu a rdpcers.com
Poge 137 of356

I"4r f'cdc l.ankaneil
0ctober 24, 2007
Page 2 ef 5
Time PerioC
TABLE,!
EXISNNG COUR'T STREET TR,AFFIC VOLUI\'IES
Eastbound Traffic
Voiume
{Vestbound Treffic
Volurne
Daily 950 1,565
Peak Hour
(4:15 PM - 5r15 PN,l)
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2007
{3r" 'r
IL,rJi ci.l :'-irt;
'total Traffic
Volume
2,515
89 166
255
The highest hourly traffic vclumes were observed betareen 4:15 and 5:15 PM (255 vehicles).
There was not a finite AM peak hour, traffic volumes \ffere consistent between 8:00 AM and 1 1:0C
AM and ranged from approximately 150 hourly vehicles to 180 hourly vehicles
Based on the information presented rn the fuwntown Reno Circulation and Parking Plan
(December 200S). the existing daily volume on Liberty Street between Arlington Avenue and
Sierra Street is 7,200 and between CenterStreetand Holcomb Avenue is 13,000. Liberty Street
is a four lane roadway and has a Level of Service (LOS) D threshold of 28 400.
We utilized the PM peak hour volumes at the Court StreeUSierra Street and Court Street Virginia
Street intersections (contained in lhe Downtown Reno Circulation and Parking P/an) to delermine
the travel patterns at the interseotisns. The PM peak hour volumes, distribution of traffic making
each movement at Court Street, and the estimated daily volumes making eaclr rnovement based
on the PM peak hour distribution is displayed on Figure 1.
The distribution indicates that at the majority of westbound traffic from the Court StreeWirginia
Street intersection travels from the westbound through movement and continues weslbound
through the Court StreeUSierra Street intersection. Eastbound traffic on Court Street is equally
split between the southbound lefl movement from Sierra Street and lhe eastbound through
movement, the majority of the traffic continues east though the Court StreeUMrginia Streel
intersection, The distribulion indicatea that Court Slreet is a cross route serving more than just the
Court Complex,
Circulation Patterns
The existing PM peak hour distribution indicates that at the majority of wsstbound tratfic from the
Court StreeWirginia Street intersection travels from the westbound through movement and
continues westbound through the Gourt StreeUSierra Street intersection. Eastbound traffic on
Court Street is equally split between the southbound left movement from Sierra Street and the
eastbound through movsment, fte majority of the traffic continues east though the Court
Street/Virginia Street intersection. The southbound left-turn movement from Siena Street is likely
drivers who are using Court Street as a link between the Sierra StreeUCenter Street one-way
couplet system.
The disbibution indicates that Court Street is a cross route serving more than just the Court
Complex
Poge 138 of356

h,/ir Todci Larrkaireu
Crlirber 24,2i1O7
l::'r:r:e ii cr( *
We revievled each vehicle movement onto Court Str"eet st Sierra Street and Virginia Street tc
determine \tvhere drivers would divert if Court Street rffere abandoned. VVe expect most drivers
'$/ho currently use f,ourt Street between Sierya Street snci Virginia Street rrculd divert to Liberty
$treet {two blocks south} and a smaller arnount to 1't $treet i3 blocks north} 'i't Street is a less
desirable di.iersion route frecause it ie ilanow, has u prchibrted eastbc'rrrrd left-turn at Virginia
$treet and is one-v/ai/ eastbound betvreen Virginia Street and Center Stieet.
$peeial-Evsfih
Downtown Reno irosts a number of special events that require Virginia Street to be closed. Based
on our research for the Downtown Reno Circulation and Parking P/an, the most commonly closed
street was Virginia Street, segments of which were elosed for rrine community events during 30
calendar clays. When Viryinia Street is closed, traffic volumes on Center Street and Sierra Street
increase ana there is an increased demand for circulation between the Sierra Street/Center
Street one-way couplet system. Court Street provides important east/v,rest connectivity between
Siena Street and Cenier Street during special events.
lmpacts to vehicle circulation are displayed on Figure 2, Drivers vrould need to negotiate three
additionaltraffic spnals with the diverted route.
FUTURE YEAR CONDITIONS
Redevelapment
Approximately 2,800 new residential units and 260,000 square feet of mixed use retail are
proposed in the Downtown Reno area. There are several parcels not associated with the Courts
Complex that will be redeveloped south of the Truckee River near Court Street as shown on
Figurc 2. Several of these parcefs will likely have direct access to Gourt Street. Eliminating the
Court Street connection between Sierra Street and Center Street could hinder downtown
red evelopment efforts.
Future Year Traftlc Volumes
2030 traffic volumes lhat include planned and proposed redevelopment projecls are provided in
lhe Downtown Reno Circulation and Parking PIan, The future year traffic volumes on Courl Street
and Liberty Street are displayed in Table 2.
Poge 139of356

$.tlt. Todct Larrkanel.r
Oclr:ber ?.4,2{}U'/
Page 4 of 5
Roadway $egment
Court $treeUState Street
TABLE 2
2O3O TORECASTED DAILY VOLUMES
numberj
ofl
t-rrres I
AcceEs
Glassiflcatlon
t'"1
aw I
l'l: i I li .v it , i- 1.,;
: 2030 );
LOS il i qis$ns rot*"*.t*e ii
rhreshord i ujiXilY", ,,?::l_ ii
i VOlUme ll
Arlirrglon Avenue to Siena Street ? Collec{or 8,500 NIA i 8,800
Sierra Street to Virginia Street 2 Collector 8.500 NIA
Virgirila Street to Cerrter Streel L Collector s,500
Center Street to Lake Street 2lcollecrorle,soolrun,ro,ooo
Liberty Street
NIA
9130A
s,8m
Arlington Avenue to Sierra Streot 4 LAC Arterial 28 400 7.200 s,200
Sierra Slreet lo Mrginia Streel ULAC Arterial 27.300 N/A 26,800
Virginia Straet to Center $treel ULAC Arleriel 27,300 N/A 23,800
Cenler Street to Holcomb
Avenue
ULAC Aderial 27,300 13,000 21,600
Notes: 'Access classificstbn besed on the RIC Regionel Transportation Plan (2004). UIAC=Ultra Lcw
Conkol, LAC=Low Access Control, I\tAc=Moderaie Acess Control
2 Based on 2005 NDOT Annual TnalTrc Reporl and daily roadway ccunts performed in 2006
N,A - Not Applicable/Available
Source: Fehr & Peers,2006 and RTG,2006
Aoaess
The future ylear volumes indicate that Gourt Street v/tll carry a significant amount of daily faffic
(approximately 10,000 daily vehicles), and the roadway will operate with volumes that exceed the
Regional Transportation Gommission's LOS D threshold. In addition, Libertlt Street will have daily
haffic volumes that ar€ approaching to the LOS D threshold, indicating that it could not
accornffiodate additional traffic volumes.
CONCLUSIONS
We do 49! rccommend abandoning Court Streot between Sierra Street and Mrginia Street fur
the followrng reasons:
r Abandoning Court Sfeet would eliminate one of two easUwest links south of
the Truckee River between the Sierra StreeUCenter Street one-way couplet
system,
o Abandoning Court Street disconnects one of two east/west roadways south
of the Truckee River that provides connectivity between Arlington Avenue
and Holcomb Avenue.
. Court Street provides rmportant east/west connectivity between Sierra Street
and Center Street during special events.
Poge 140 of356

i/li- Tocd Lartkarretr
l)t;ioirer 24,2DA7
i;age 5 crf 5
* Fulure year traffic volumes indicate that Court .Street v'rill carry a significant
arnount of traffic that could not be accomrilffJated by parallel rDadways.
o Elirninating the Court $treet connection oetween Sierra titreet and Center
$treet could hinder Dorvntown Reno rede,relcpment efforts by reducing
eastiwest con nectivity a n d roadlvay ca pacity.
lf you have any questions regarding the information presented rn thts fetter please call me at 826-
3200.
Sincerely
FEHR & PEERS
i r ./t
r-l!. - J- ,/ I y'
f/,i{/-rt ,:f4,"**
{/",/
Katy Flynn
Senior Engi neer/Planner
RN07-0337
Poge 141 of356

isfE
trE
E5
EE
EE
C=
3r
E;
(,g
€
(9 'o
Ns c)
o
o_

t.
l:, *'
2;
eo
ET
E<
OE
P;
EE
ts
,lt o
!t>
!'o
vro
€!
tE
.iE
5g
Eo
Etr
5E
o8
sts
=o.
OE
C';
qro
9El
f6 !=
gc o
(Fdi
*t {;
FL:
N t2o
E
v
tr)
b
cr)
*n'
c)
rn
-
o_

lit,crt 01.Cct-C7
'i):Dl
i?:',5
i2:;lill
-":2:45
01:00
0 lt'ifi
U:i;3tJ
0i;4r:
02:$J
0?:1,$
02:Sfl
OIZ:*U :
03:(E
03:i5 "
OS:3O
Oi1.i5 :'
{r4:t l)
a4..,t5:.:
04;30
o4:45i. , : "'
fts:f,O '
..05::15 .i '.::.: 't ;
05:30 '
,.p5-45::, :,:::. .";.
06:C0
,i06:i5:::': ii::":. i
Total 0
0 ,:H
o o% sFr#
Pcak
Vcll'.t{.F.
..
ADT ldr.rl Calculated
455
Fchi- enC De*i.:
lil.; .''vest L befry, Suitc 3D i
Fi*rrii. fJ\/ ,1]i{5ll I
51
tt
24
o?
2;l
32
48
.r.d t ''I
38 I
s1 |
111
1ei
10i
.e1:
28i
z2
;tt+
:lo.
17:
.l
:i0,
72
i!+l
2
.17 .
$
.12.:,
1Z
'aE.'i
:.0..1
7i
"'g.tl
r707
'9L19 127
0.0% zE.7aA t3.3'/e 93.7% SS,3%
.'Cii.Ll
%
0.016 O.Oli) 0-C% C.Od./o 0.0% 0.0o,/:
06:45 00:45 07 30 03:16 07:00
i55 214 147 20S 74
0.e3e 0.578
"1.79!---0,S.49---0,€LZ-.
Poge 144 of 356
00
l;;7c'
Sitc 3ode. 2
rilstior ID. 6754
Court fjt Li3
1900
O,Ath, 34-B?'a 66.0%
08:45 00:45
139 208
o ligl B 912

f-:hr trrrr' Peerg
51i !,4/c:t l-ib*rt"v, $uhe 30i
iletxr. lrf" lii-l5lt-
Ai{ ll-. iluulr.:T'>
Slarr i rll "Ct:t-LrT !i,e Wed Thu Ftl
.T.i:9_.1.S-_f-Sj._..P-s."1d"._-.? iv'i.
_.4,1d.,....._".:
u
11
Ll!:iSi
0!;30
C?:45
n-l:tll
0-1:i 5
U'3:30
*62:$73
B4n
?4i
244
ACg
I ' 5.t! 6 8.1
+: 680
278
' 53i 2 C1
4 C:r
' ii2. 0 7t
*.i * :..40 '0 €,s
"631&4
bSi4i , t ... . .;. * i:: :, .: 47. .0 ', n1
l:[.:f]f)
05:16
Pirgc t
.{irle tl:xjs: i
.3ta':i6n it"r:
C,au;: -Qt v'vB
L;tituce: 0' 0,000 Urdef:ned
S,ft ,trefag: DAy
ij . .,1i8
'ril t6
65i
2 16tl
i'i 60
668
1U U8
c76
2 0r0
'1 67
4 U,
'7 ' 6r)
.:. .. 06
i :53
,";..
it .v'1
b4
2 . '58'
041 z
'tl
:.:.::.44:.'.::. :. : 1.6
Total 038fi3 1?49 109i?.12S31,t000.J0u01.1175t|J02
it -,. 37:
-n:Yot43z:1444s1ooDo.3rrr
T+tal
tl- t n.l ,1
sprfft 0.0% 0.0% 20.1% 7?.sqi 31.9% 6821fr tonf 0.0qil fi.tto/c 0.0',6 n.0i6 0.rr% r.0% 0.oi6 34.496 65.6r,r
'Paak
1C.:15 $4:15 10:15 l,;4:16 07:ii.]
Vul.
227 2E0 201 4r0 12',1
F.H.F. 0:90'1 0.G78 A.7n C.tl60 0,t!'lJ
ADT No{ GalculotcC
Poge l45of 356
10:15 @:15
748 X32
___.._____L6?5.. . . q.?.33

C. Securily Systems
HOLD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
Poge 146of356

D. Remodel of 1966 Addition
L
2,
?
Conversion of Detention Spoce in the .l965 Addition
In order to convert this spoce into usoble spoce by the Courts, this will require the
removol of oll of the interior portitions, cells, restroom focilities, ceilings, ond
complete replocement of mechonicol / electricol systems throughout, Fortunotely,
when this building wos designed, it wos designed os o series of steel trusses cleor
sponning the building with o metol deck ond concrete floor system with the
copocity to support office development on eoch of the floors, Additionolly, the
west foqode will be removed in its entirety, with the exception of the sheor wolls ot
the ends ond reploced with o gloss curtoin woll to enhonce views ond provide
noturol doy lighting to the spqces, The structurol copocity for these systems hos
been reviewed, ond it oppeors to be odequote, provided thot we strengthen some
of the connections; primorily olong the west wqll,
Remodel Vqcont Spqce on Level 2 of the .|965 Addition
The spoce which hos been vocoted by the District Attorney's office on the second
floor of the .|965 Addition con be renovoted into future office spoce ond Court
suppori spoce, provided thot o new mechonicol / electricol system is instolled,
including new doto, communicotion & fire olorm systems, upgrode of the fire
sprinkler system ond osbestos obotement ore performed,
Generol Upgrodes
This would include replocement of virtuolly oll interior portitions, the exterior
insulotion & furring system; new lighting, power, doto ond fire olorms systems, new
mechonicol systems throughout ond new finishes throughout the entire building os
well os code complionce upgrodes.
Poge 147 of356

E. Upgrode of Hisloilc Courthouse
An onolysis wos completed to identify the code requirements thot would come into
ploy should the Historic Courthouse be renovoted for continued court use ond the
overoll occuponcy level of the Historic Courthouse ond the .l965 Addition increose,
Pleqse see the Accessibility ond Code Complionce Site Survey prepored by
Schirmer Engineering doted December 21, 2OO7 (Revised Jonuory 15, 2008) for
specific informotion,
Poge 148 of356

8.E.1 - Accessrbility ond Code Complionce
Sife Survey - Historic Courthouse
Prepored by Schirmer Engineering
Poge 149of356

E -ltCt+tnfWen frIEt tii E-E-EIfiI e Fil'3'?s;; i$3lJffu,""
11270 Bernardo praza courr, ste. 116
Fire Protection I Code Consulting I Risk Control I Security Consulting
December 21 ,2OO7
Via E-mail: toddl@collaborativedesiqnstudio.com
Mr. Todd Lankenau, CSl, lCC, LEED AP
Principal and Managing Partner
Collaborative Design Studio
92144 Double R Blvd., Suite B
Reno, Nevada 89521
(775) 348-7777
Re. Accessibility & Code Compliance Site Survey
October ?,?OO7
Washoe County Court House - Historic Building
Reno, California
SEC Project No.: 2007026-000
Dear Todd:
(s 58) 6 23. ss4s
Schirmer Engineering has completed an evaluation for accesstbility and code compliance for tfp
historic Washoe County Court House (Courthouse). The Courthouse is four (4) stories in height
with a basement level. The Courthouse has been constructed in four different phases with the
original Courthouse completed in 1873. The North Wing was added to the Courthouse in 1946
and the South Wing was added in 1949. ln 1963, the West annex was added to the courthouse.
The building is partially sprinklered such that only the first f loor library and basement level have
sprinkler protection. The entire building has a frre alarm system which has offsite monitoring.
An extensive restoration of the Courthouse is planned. In preparation of this restoration,
Collaborative Design Studio (Collaborative) has retained Schirmer Engineering to conduct an
accessibility and code compliance review utilizing the 2006 International Building Code (lBC)
and Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)for new construction.
On October 2, 2OO7, Schirmer Engineering along with Keith Roberts of Collaborative surveyed
the existing conditions of this building. The following are floor by floor comments pertaining to
code and accessibility issues based on the survey as well as floor plans dated September 13,
2007.
Basement:
1. The existing entrance located adjacent to the men's locker room and the existing exit
located adjacent to the Sergeant's office are currently rrt accessible. Accessible
entrances must be provrded for all required exits (ADAAG Section 4.1.3 (8)(a)(ii)).
Schirmer Engineering Corporalion
www.schirmereng.com
Poge 150 of356

Washoe Cou nty Courthouse
Reno. Nevada
First Level:
December 21,2007
SEC Project No.: 2007026-000
2. Since this building is not fully sprinklered, an area of rescue assistance (also known
as area of refuge) is required based on the number of exits required per floor. A
horizontal ext may be utilized in lieu of an area of refuge. The current basement
level currently does not have either of these features (ADAAG Sectton 4.1.3 No. 9).
3. The countertops in the men's bathroom exceed a maximum height of 34-inches
above finished floor {ADAAG Section 4.19.2). Additionally, the men's bathroom has
not accessible toilet stall (ADAAG Sectton 4.23.4).
4. The two-story stair from the 1"' floor level lobby (historic side) to the basement level
has noncompliant stairs and treads (lBC Section 1009.3) Additionally, the stair
landing is located in a maintenance room which has obstructions preventing a clear
landing (lBC Section 1009.4). The landing on the first f loor is insuff icient as well.
5. The elevator (historic side) is required to open into an elevator lobby ilBC Section
7O7.14.1) or be provided with additional doors (i.e., won-door). Currently, the
elevator opens into the maintenance room.
6. The northwest stair adjacent to the boiler room leading up to the first floor level is
only 42-inches wide. This may be an issue (i.e., if this stair serves less than 50
occupants then only a 36-inch stair is required; otherwise a 44-inch stair is required -
IBC Section 1009.1).
7. Accessible entrances must be provided for all required exits (ADAAG Section 4.1.3
(exaxii)). Currently, the only entrance that is accessible is located on the south side.
8. Stnce this building is not fully sprinklered, an area of rescue assistance (also known
as area of refuge) is required based on the number of exits required per floor. A
horizontal ext may be utilized in lieu of an area of ref uge. The current first floor level
currently does not have either of these features (ADAAG Section 4.1.3 No. 9).
9. The elevator (historic side) is required to open into an elevator lobby {lBC Section
707.14.1) or be provided with additional doors (i.e., won-door).
10.The public bathrooms are not provided with accessible stalls (ADAAG Sectton
4.23.4).
1 1. The stair across the men's bathroom (adjacent to the law library) has a 40-inch
landing on the first f loor. This width of the landing shall not be less than the width of
the stairways they serve (lBC Section 1009.4).
12. The middle stair and the southern stair in the law library serving the basement level
are only 43-inches wide. This may be an issue (i.e., if this stair serves less than 50
occupants then only a 36-inch stair is required; otherwise 44-inch stair is required -
IBC Section 1009.1).
Poge 15.| of356

Washoe Cou nty Courthouse
Reno, Nevada
Second Level:
December ?1,2OOT
SEC Project No.. 2007026-000
13. The exterior exit ramp which is accessed from the northernmost stair has a vertical
duct protruding into the exterior exit ramp thus causing a reduction in the egress
width (lBC Section 1003.6).
14. The two-story stair serving the first level (not the spiral stair) is only 36-inches wide.
This may be an issue (i.e., if this stair serves less than 50 occupants then only a 36inch
stair is required; otherwise 44-inch stair is required - IBC Section 1009.1).
15. Since this bullding is not fully sprinklered, an area of rescue assistance (also known
as area of refuge) is required based on the number of exits required per floor. A
horizontal ext may be utilized in lieu of an area of refuge. The current level currently
does not have either of these features (ADAAG Section 4.1.3 No. 9).
16. The elevator in tle jail is required to open into an elevator lobby (lBC Section
7O7.14.1) or be provided with additional doors (i.e., won-door).
17.The exit door opening in the stair across the men's bathroom adjacent to the jail
causes a reduction in the landing width (lBC Section 1008.1 .5).
Third & Fourth Levels:
General:
18. The accessible stall in the men's bathroom shall have a minimum length of 56-inches
(ADAAG Figure 30(a)). The current length is S5-rnches.
19. The elevators serving both of these levels are required to open into an elevator lobby
(lBC Section707.14.1)or be provided with additional doors (i.e., won-door).
20. The drinkrng fountains shall protrude no more than 4-inches into the corridor
{ADAAG Section 4.4.1).
21. Since this building is not f ully sprinklered, an area of rescue assistance (also known
as area of refuge) is required based on the number of exits required per floor. A
horizontal ext may be utilized in lieu of an area of refuge. The current levels
currently do not have either of these features (ADAAG Section 4.1.3 No. 9
22. For any areas that are considered assembly with 50 or more persons, panic
hardware shall be required on all doors (lBC Section 1008.1 .9).
23. Due to the building being constructed in phases, an allowable area calculation needs
to be determined to verify if fire walls are required. lt appears in some locations, roll
down fire doors/shutters are provided but have either been removed or do not meet
the proper fire-protection rating (most likely 90-minutes). For example, the door
separating the law library to the remaining building on the first floor level is only
separated by a 20-minute door. On the second floor, the location for the roll down
fire door separatrng the historic Courthouse has been removed but the tracks still
remain.
Poge 152of356

Washoe Cou nty Courthouse
Reno, Nevada
Prepared By.
December 21,2OO7
sEC Project No.: 2007026-000
24. All corridors need to rated for one-hour with 20-minute openings (lBC Table 1017.1).
This needs to be verified. lf the building is fully sprinklered then this is no longer
required.
25. Please note that if the building is f ully sprinklered then the area of refuge requirement
is no longer applicable in accordance with ADAAG but is still required based on
Section 1007 of the 2006 lBC. Although, it should be further noted that the 2007
Supplement to the IBC no longer requires areas of refuge for fully sprinklered
buildings.
26. Please note that since the building is considered in the National Register of Historic
Places, several of the code issues may not be required if the entire building is
provided with an automatic sprinkler system.
27. An egress analysis needs to be prepared in order to determine if the stairs that serve
only two levels are required for the means of egress. lf so, then these stairs may
need to be enclosed (lBC Section 1020.1 ).
SCHIRMER ENGINEERING
Aman Shah
Senior Consultant
AS:jm
S,\SNDGO\PROJECTS\JOB 2aGA2c7c2E Washoe County Courts Master Plan (Renoi\ltas.534.Todd.Lankenau - Historic Bldg
12.21 .A7.doc
Poge 153 of356

8.E.2 - Accessrrbility ond Code Complionce
Site Survey - 1995 North Tower
Prepored by Schirmer Engineering
Poge 154of356

E -l$iQt+tntWgn frFEtiN EtrnTN g Fili. ?shi#3lJff' Fax (8 s 8 )
11z7o.Bernardo Fraza court, ste 116
Fire Protection I Code Consulting I Risk Control t Security Consulting
December 21,2OO7 {Revised January 15, 2008)
Via E-mai l. toddl@ col laborativedesionstu dio.com
Mr. Todd Larkenau, CSl, lCC, LEED AP
Principal and Managing Partner
Collaborative Design Studio
9444 Double R Blvd., Suite B
Reno, Nevada 89521
(775) 348-7777
Re: Accessibility & Code Compliance Site Survey
October 2,2OO7
Washoe County Court Complex - 1995 North Tower
1 South Sierra
Reno, California
SEC Project No.: 2007A26-002
Dear Todd:
6 23. s*4e
Schirmer Engineering has completed an evaluation for accessibility and code compliance for the
North Tower in the Washoe County Court Complex. The North Tower is currently three (3)
stories in height with a basement level. Two (2) additional stories are being considered for the
North Tower. However, the increased building height will still be less than 75 feet and therefore
will not be considered a high-rise. The North Tower was originally constructed in 1995 and is
connected to the South Tower at the first and second levels. However, the South Tower is
considered a high-rise building.
Both Towers are fully sprinklered but have individual fire service lead-ins. The South Tower has
a secondary water supply with a fire pump in accordance with the high-rise provisions while the
North Tower is supplied directly from the city main.
Based on a proposed master plan for the entire Washoe County Court Complex, Collaborative
Design Studio (Collaborative) has retained Schirmer Engineering to conduct an accessibility and
code compliance review utilizing the 20OO International Building Code (lBC) and Americans with
Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) for new construction.
IBC Section 705 allows the utilization of fire walls when creating separate buildings. lf fire walls
are not utilized than connected buildings will be treated as a single building. Since the North
Tower does not utilize the secondary water supply from the South Tower (high-rise building) ard
has its own fire protection system, a three-hour fire wall with three-hour openings (or two 90mtnute
doors side by side) is required to separate the two towers thus allowing the two separate
f ire protection systems.
Schirmer Engineering Corporation
www.schirmereng.com
Poge 155of356

Washoe County Complex - North Tower 2
Reno, Nevada
December 21,2007 (Rev. 1/15/08)
SEC Project No.: 2007O26-Nz
The most logical location for this fire wall would be along column line 1. However, it is unclear if
the wall along column line 1 is a three-hour fire wall. The doors into the elevator lobby and the
single door adjacent to the lobby on the first floor appear to not be rated for three-hours. The
doors into the lobby on the second floor are only rated for 20-minutes.
Therefore, it appears that a fire wall was never established thus requiring the towers to be
treated as a single high-rise building throughout complying with the provisions in IBC Section
403.
The accessibility requirements for the North Tower appear to be compliant.
Prepared By:
SCHIRMER ENGINEERING
Aman Shah
Senior Consultant
AS
S:\SNDGO\PROJECTS\JOE 2CAA2A7A26 Washoe County Couns Master Plan (Reno)\ltas.535.Todd-Lankenau - 1995 North Tower
12.21 .G7(Hev. 1 .1 S 0Bl doc
Poge 156of356

F. Deferred Moinlenqnce
The deferred mointenonce refers to mointenonce which is currently required or
currently plonned in the Historic Courthouse Building, Annex ond Joil building, Some of
this cost wos previously budgeted for replocement of the mechonicol systems,
ductwork, osbestos obotement, etc, but the design hos not been completed ond work
hos not yet been performed, Addiiionolly, we find thot with the further development of
this building, there is mointenonce which hos been deferred which is not currently
ollocoted in the Copitol lmprovement Progrom, since the oreos such os the Joil ore
currently not being used or the work is not yet required to be performed,
In Exhibit 8,.l we hove provided o deferred mointenonce schedule wherein we hove
estimoted the opproximote costs for the items of deferred mointenonce thot we see os
o necessory portion of the development of the Historic Courthouse. Annex ond Joil,
Poge 157 of356

9. DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
Poge 158 of356

Poge 159of356

9. DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
A totol of 9 exponsion, construction, ond renovotion options were initiolly identified ond
developed within the existing buildings thot comprise the Judiciol Complex ond
odjocent properties including Court Street ond the Pioneer site, Included wos one
option thot would, of vorious points in time, utilize leose spoce for the Public Defender,
Alternotive Public Defender office, ond the Monioge License Bureou ond Chopel
component of the County Clerk. Exhibit 9-l identifies the Judiciol Complex site plon
ond indicotes the potentiol development projects thot were incorporoted into the 9
options in vorious combinotions on exhibit 9-2.
A. Alternofives
All olternotives initiolly developed supported o future requirement for 45 equivolent
judiciol positions - ten positions for the Justice Court ond 35 positions for the 2no District
Court, The olternotives developed new spoce thot would work in conjunction with
utilizing oll of the Historic Courthouse, continued utilizotion of the .l965 Addition,
utilizotion of One South Sieno, ond in some instonces, exponsion of One South Sierro by
odding two floors.
Alternotives thot included exponsion by odding two floors to One South Sierro were
developed to qccommodote consolidotion of the Fomily Division of the 2no District
Court, requiring 18 judiciol positions. ln these olternqtives the ten courts for the Justice
Court would be relocoted to new spoce ond/or existing spoce in the Historic
Courthouse ond the .|965 Addition, In this instonce, with 18 courfs provided in on
exoonded One South Sierro, there would be o need to develoo 27 courls between the
existing Historic Courthouse, the .l965 Addition, ond new spoce. lf oll nine courts were
to be utilized in the existing Historic Courthouse ond the .l965 Addition, then it would be
necessory to construct l8 new courts odjocent to the Historic Courihouse utilizing o
portion of the Pioneer site,
lf exponsion of One South Sieno wos not included in the olternotive, then the Justice
Courf would expond ond occupy oll spoce with their ten courts ond the 2nd District
Court, requiring occommodotions for 35 equivolent judiciol positions, would occupy o
combinotion of the existing Historic Courthouse ond the .|965 Addition plus new
construction, lf oll nine courts in the Historic Courthouse ond the .|965 Addition were
utilized, this would require the construction of 26 odditionol courtrooms,
Eoch of the potentiol development options thot could be included in olternotive
moster plon scenorios is identified in Exhibit 9-2 for review, Eoch olternqtive developed
throughout this report includes these components in vqrious combinotions,
Exhibit 9-3 identifies, for the eoch of the eight olternotives included in the Workshop #3
presentotion, the omount of spoce provided in One South Sierro, the .l965 Addition, the
Historic Courthouse, ond new construction thot comprises the overoll net squore feet
included in eoch olternotive,
Poge 160of356

For eoch olternotive we hove develop o phosed spoce development sequence
ideniifying when eoch project is implemented, spoces ore relocoted, qnd remodeling is
conducted to support requirements through the yeor 2040. Exhibits 9-4 through 9-.|0
identify the primory olternotives ond their development concepts,
Exhibit 9-l I identifies eoch of these eight olternotives ond the contemploted
development sequence, which olwoys begins with construction of new spoce on the
Court Street/Pioneer site to ollow the relocotion into thot spoce of ony deportments or
courts thot would be disploced by the remodeling of One South Sierro, the
reolocement of the .l965 Addition, or the renovotion of the Historic Courthouse. The
development sequence begins with the first new construction in the yeor 2011 through
2012 followed by phosed reorrongement, renovotion, ond further development, The
moster plon is completed in oll options by opproximotely 2035,
Should the projections for the Fomily Court Division, os developed by the Fomily Courl,
be reolized, on olternotive thot would relocote the Fomily Court to on independent
focility in q more "suburbon" locotion would then require the provision of 27 courts in
the downtown complex, With the Justice Court occupying ten courtrooms in One
South Sierro, this would then require provision of l7 courtrooms using o combinotion of
One South Sierro, the .l965 Addition, ond new construction, lf oll nine courts in the
Historic Courthouse ond the .l965 Addition were utilized, this would then require the
development of o new building providing occommodotions for only eight equivolent
judiciol positions.
Poge 161 of356

X
|rJ
-loo
O
3r'
F
e,
D
o
oFz-
J
o
Tl o
O\l ul
El o
ol (n E
=l *l
Gt
=
=ul
=J
d,
ul
rtl
c!
v
C)
n
o_

z
-lo-
e,
ul
F
CN
xul
J
oo
()
(n
F
e,
D
o
O
lz
D
o
$l o
O.l ul
Fl
ol
o
-.n
=l +l
Gt
=
z
J
oe,
IIJ
F(t,
ul
=3t,
(Ey
ryE!
v'
:l
.i.;
i-J
f1
ii.
r,1 =
Ef
'Ftgd L
LIJ nl
ft{
.F1 on*&:
V-! fi
^-'Xfi
{"t
{.
LU*
.vF;
u
o
L.ruc
1; *. fii
"{ ,.i.} fC
*,
P'/l
-> nt
uq nl
w
*c4
!J
=r..l
el
LL
(".r {u
t'_i fl
E16
:q :il
?'1
==
-ru
4{J q/l l/r
f[l ru
-c" .c
: EJ
f?
€ rL
-c
fil
a-
-r'1
{J
: a
flJ
Lrl
Y.
&3
L;
*
w
L'l
r_ f,.'I Cfi € tr)
cr)
o
€
a)
rTl
o_

EXHIBIT 9-3
spAcE DEVETOPMENT COMPONENT (NSF)
Add 2
Floors
One South Sieno 1965 Addition
Remodel
Exisiing
Front
Porch
Convert
Joil
Remodel
Existing
Reploce
Historic
Courthouse
Remodel Pioneer
Construction
Court
Qtroaf
LEOSE
Other
Totol
Gross
Squore
Feet
Provided
Option
IA 30.000 r 0.000 14,000 51,000 25,000 278,OOO 448,OW
Option
IB 60,000 30,000 8.000 80.000 25.000 205.000 448.000
Option
2A 60,000 30,000 r 0,000 r4,000 5r,000 25.000 214,OOO A44,OOO
Option
3A 30.000 r r.000 r r 0.000 25.000 180.000 40.000 436,000
Option
4A 30.000 8.000 r 07,000 25.000 253.000 463,000
Option
48 60,000 30,000 8,000 r 03,000 25,000 r 82,000 448,000
Option
4C 60.000 30.000 8.000 107,000 25,000 206.000 45r.000
Poge 164of356

o
oo.
! o
o
o
600
580
SCrl
540
520
500
480
460
440
424
400
380
3{O
340
320
300
284
260
240
22D
2U)
r80
r60
r40
120
r0[
BO
f{r
40
20
EXHIBIT 9-4
ALTERNATIVE
l-A
0
2008 2m9 2l-ll0 20ll 2012 1A13 m14 2015 2016 2017 20lB 2019 2020 !)21 ny2 nX 2024 2O2A 2O2t 2027 AJ2A 2029 2030 2031 2f32 2J3:r 203{ 2035 20 2037 2$A 2cE92O
-
CuilentMF
-
tttl
tttl
TTtrl cdslrud2m.mo$ l-Ttt-l RenooieSl,0l0sF
Cutrst sooc6 222.tI! C6F
cuit lwce t sa.mo lsF / 222,060 csF i
YeG
Cufi$fcsF -d.,.,^i Curentshtrlfoll ----..".,.: Lecesp€e
Poge 165of356
tl
:spoc€ Requir€d Ls Les6spoce

o
5 o
o
o
a
c1{]0
580
5/0
524
500
480
4C,O
440
424
400
380
360
340
320
300
2AO
2e,o
240
220
20|J
180
160
t40
120
t00
80
60
40
20
ALTERNATIVE
t-B
0
2008 2CO9 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20t5 2016 2017 201A 2019 2020 2021 2V22 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027'1J2a /)29 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 m37 2c38 n392MO
''''.'',',,,,,,,.,,. Currstl$F
CutrstCSF
TT|TI cmtrucrls0.orllSF - l-T2Tl corctruct60.0OOSF
- Tftn
Pls Cutrst 5 fKi do | 2d). CICO 6 F
Curenl Sp@€ I54.mMF /222,mo GF
Y{rs
Curents/^sltdt ****,*,.,,.,. LreSorce
ctrEhuctso.mosF FTAl-l cffiiuci s.cnosF
Poge 166 of 356

o
o_
E
o
o
280
26{)
24n
220
2.J0
t80
r60
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
EXHIBIT 9.6
ATTERNATIVE
2-A
E cutrenrr6F
-
" -"-*""-**1-*'-'*'
t 6se s Doce 29O c0] 6 F
Plus Curent Shotrol 26OCrn C$F
I
aurenl SFce 222.m0GF
Cutrenl spoce I 54.0m is, jrr.-o*,
tl
ttl
ttl
Sose Reued L6 [eoseSDrce
4 2015 2016 2017 2018 201e 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 202t.2CD7 2028 2029 2$n 2$1 20i2 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 20392(AO
Yeqts
curenrc6F ,t*?ll tecespoc
fTf-'l cmiuct 2t 4.m0 sF EEEI contsruct 5e.000 sF fTtf-'l Ad I4.0rlcr sF Joil FTA'|"] cctuct Infill I 0.000 $
Poge 167 of 356
I
:
I

o
3
! O
o
o
o
o
600
580
560
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
3Cn
280
26J
240
220
2|:D
180
Itu
l4D
120
100
80
60
40
20
o
EXHIBIT 9.7
ATTERNATIVE
3-A
'* -- "'("- I
I
I
ll
tl
ttl
tl
lSpoce Rewled Ls tece Sprce
20l200r 2010 20r 20r2 20r3 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2425 2026 n27 202A nT 2030 203r 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2034 2039
-
Cutrs'fhFF
-
Curer, SFce 222,fu SF
Ycots
Cunslc,sF Cutrst
Shortfdl
Lresprce
TTiTI cffiiucl 140000sF l-TiTl Lre40.oo0sF TTti-l comtrucrto.mosr l-TaT-l corshucJtl.000sF l-T5Il Add4qooosF
Poge 168 of356
I
i

o
o
O
I o
:€Ll
560
54r:i
520
5@
480
46D
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
3m
280
2efr
240
220
2c,0
t80
t60
140
120
t00
80
60
40
20
EXHIBIT 9-8
ALTERNATIVE
4-A
W E # Leose
-4---'-
397
I
I
I
434
I
/l-
So€e 29OC0:l GF
I rus Curcnl Shqldol 2dl,C(O G
Cureri S@ce 222.m0GsF
Cursl Sp@e l54,0otl t6F / 222.U 6t
0
20m 2009 2010 20| 2a12 2013 2014 2A15 2016 2017 20tB 2019 2020 2021 2922 2023 2024 2@5 26)6 2f)7 i'{n8 Tr29 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2X37 2038 20392()4J
currsrfsF
n-il] - csstructlzs.ooosr - l-T2T-l conslrucll07,000sr l-T.gT-l consiructTs.c00sF l-Tll-l hfill 8,cmsF
Y@tr
E
curdl6F $Hil] Lcsprce
Poge 169of356
520
530
470

o
o_
t o
O
)o
o
600
580
560
540
520
5CLl
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
26t)
240
22Ll
2C/l
180
I 6rl
140
120
rc0
80
60
40
2l\
0
ALTERNATIVE
4-B
I
Ir
Relocole 70. CCoSF
441
2009 2010 20il 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
cutrsr6F
tl
ll
tl
I
ll
Relocde S, OOSf
cutrtrrGsF ,?5?ll Lresptre
501
Currtrl Spoce 222,mO 6F
R4ired L* Lse Spoc€
9 2A20 2021 2V22 2023 2024 2D2a 2V26 2V27 2028 2tr29 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040
yds
TTfl cmtuctlB2,o0osr -
- [-TzT.l comtuct103.000sr l-T5T-l comlrucr6o.cmsF TT[f-l cffituct8,000sF
I
Curenf Spoce I 54,0CO MF I Z22,Ut GSF
I
I
I
I
Poge 170of356

o
oo-
T o
o
o
o
600
580
560
540
620
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
36!
340
320
3m
2BO
6J
40
t1
EXHIBIT 9.I O
ALTERNATIVE
4-C
0
2008 2009 2010 20ll 2012 2013 2014 2ol5 2016 2017 2018 2019 2A2D 2021 2022 2023 2Q2a 2426 7 2CtA 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040
n cu(srrsF
-
tl
tl
tl Cutred Sp@e I54.0co NSt l222.000Gs!
Yaols
curenr6F ,?*il] Lsesptre
TTtrlCffi.|ructl5o.|]IsFTTiTlcffinUct6o,0o0SFTftTlcom1ructlo/'00:]5FTTaTlcqsfucts.00o5F
Poge 171 of356
tl
tl

EXHIBIT 9- I I
DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCES
FOR ATTERNATIVES
De\relopmsll Corqconenis
ft-l
| 3 I
m]
Corrl StreelPro"reer Sile Phose I
Court S'treet/Pioneer Sile - Phose 2
begin Leosing Ottice Spoce
Reploce te6sAddition
EI
l_--.;
t-i-I
r;T-.T
Develop Joil Spoce
lnfill I South Porch
Add Le,vels lo I Soulh Seno
Reononge I Soulh ge{ro
EI
['LT, -.fi
f::ffi:l
Remove 1965 Addiiion
Renovote Hbloric Ccxlrthouse
Renovole I 965 Additicr-)
Opaion 2@ | 2@9t 20r( mll 2012 2013 201/ 20ll ml( 20\1 20ls IOt9 20zo t02l 2022 m2i 202, dl?I, 2O2l mzi 2.l?€ dt2! to![ mll 20!2 20ll l03r b3a m!8l2o!9l20{
IA
IB
2A
2S
3A
4,A
4B
4C
I .,11 ! 8 ) t0 6
I 1 ':r"A J trl 1 6
I 8, 5 ;; 11 , ilg :6
I 9 ,i""."*: r0 6
I 9 J! , a 6
9
'10
1 I 6
I 9 :lo 7 I 6
Poge 172of356

B. Cost Anolysis
The preliminory evoluotion of spoce requirements, existing copocities to renovote
focilities ond remodel existing spoce, ond on estimote of the costs for new construction
ond renovotion ollowed for development of the Development Cost Anolysis presented
on Exhibit 9-12. This exhibit shows vorious combinotions of the different development
opportunities thot would comprise complete olternotives, eoch providing o totql of
37.|,000 NSF (530,000 GSF) over the plonning horizon. Eoch olternotive builds upon the
bose of the current County spoce inventory of .l54,000 NSF (equivolent to 272,000 GSF
of o building efficiency of 707" net-to-gross oreo), ond successive construction,
relocotion, demolition, spoce replocement, ond new development components os
spoce is odded to the inventory so thot, by the yeor 2O4O, o totol of 530,000 GSF is
provided,
A number of ossumptions were mode in the development of the Cost Anolysis, A
detoiled breokdown of construction costs for the development components is
summorized in Exhibit 9-.l3, A generol summory is provided in Exhibit 9-14. The entire
cost estimote is presented in Appendix E,
I ) Lond is consumed of the Pioneer site of o lond cost of S4O/squore foot,
2) The yeor indicotes the mid-point of construction, which then identifies the
number of yeors thot inflotion of the inflotion foctor tokes ploce to colculote the
inflotion foctor, The totol cost is then the cost thqt we would onticipote when
the project is octuolly constructed,
3) Soft costs ore odded qt the multiplier shown in the heoding - initiqlized of 35%,
This occommodotes lO"/" for design ond consulting, 3% for project monogement,
4o/" for County odministrotion, 4"/" for permits, inspections, ond fees to utility
componies, o l0% Owner-controlled contingency, 2,5"/" for insurqnces by the
generol controctor, ond 1.5o/"for bond ond sub guord,
4) The unit cost for new construction storts off with o bose construction cost of
$3O0/squore foot, Buildings of different sizes developed on Court Street ond/or
the Pioneer site oll hove o bosement for security, in-custody holding, judiciol
porking, centrol plont, ond o freight dock ot-grode thot consume the entire site
including plozo oreo, All olternotives hove o 6,000 squore foot, three-level
volume lobby. All new construction hos o one-time systems cost of $3 million for
security monitoring, building control, security systems, lT infrostructure, ond other
speciol functions thot ore olwoys present in o building regordless of its size, This
meons thot for the below-grode spoce, lobby, ond systems there is o bose cost
of $.|2,5 million thot must be qbsorbed by ony building developed on the Court
Street/Pioneer site regordless of size, Then, on odded cost of $3OO/squore foot is
odded for qll spoce constructed less 6,000 squore feet for the lobby, These
current construction costs ore then inflqted bqsed upon the number of yeors until
the construction is initioted, For the first phqse increment, which is constructed os
the first tosk in oll olternotives (Lines #9), the mid-point of construction is 2012 -
four yeors in the future, requiring on inflotion foctor of I ,.|8,
Poge 173 of356

5) The discounted cost tokes into occount the time volue of money ond utilizes o
discount rote thot is initiolized of 6o/",
6) The index cost is the rotio of the cost in comporison to the lowest cost olternotive
(which is Alternotive 28 - o one phose development plus utilizotion of leosed
spoce with retention of oll existing spoce ond no construction on the upper floors
of One South Sierro), The three columns of the indices ore for totol construction
cost, construction cost plus soft costs, ond the present volue of the cost,
7) By developing new spoce on the Court Street/Pioneer site, occuponts of the
third floor of One South Sierro con find temporory occommodotions of o
relotively low cost ond thus, the only penolty is shown on Line # l3 - $560,000,
which represents odditionol stoff costs, inefficiency of moving from building to
building, disruption, relocotion costs, etc. lf more thon the third floor of One
South Sierro hos to be vocoted during two yeors of construction, the cost would
increose becouse the County would then hove to relocote the Justice Court
ond oll of the odministrotive stoff,
8) There is no ollowqnce in ony of these options for significont off-site construction
costs for infrostructure, utilities, or roods,
9) In oll instonces there should be o cost of obout $20lsquore foot for qll spoce thot
is developed ond/or occupied (obout 37.l,000 net squore feet) to provide new
furniture for obout 70o/" of the occuponts, These cosfs ore not included in the
onolysis.
Exhibit 9-8 identifies the equivolent gross squore feet involved in eoch construction or
renovotion project, estoblishes o unit cost for the direct construction cost ossocioted
with the project plus generql controctor morkups, overheod, ond profit to estoblish the
estimoted construction cost in terms of yeor 2008 construction volues. The exhibit goes
on to indicote the yeor thot construction is initioted, the inflotion foctor bosed upon
4,5% onnuol inflotion to the ooint of construction, ond then the totol cost incurred in the
future when the project is constructed,
Soft costs will generolly totol obout 35% of the hord construction cost, This includes
design, project monogement, project insuronces, relocotion, permits, ond speciol
inspections, Adding the 35% soft cost ollowonce indicotes the totol cost of the project
onticipoted in dollor vqlues relotive to when the cost ore incurred with inflqtion
included,
The discounted cost reduces o future cost to its present volue by toking into occount
the time volue of money, The discount rote of 6% is opplied in Exhibit 9-8 to reflect the
onticipoted current tox-exempt finoncing rote thqt would be opplicoble should
Certificotes of Porticipotion or tox-exempt bonds be used os the underlying finoncing
instrument,
On Line No, l2 of Exhibit 9-12 o summory of the costs for eoch of the olternotives is
presented, Column Nos, 7, 8, ond 9 indicote the dollor volue (in 1,000's) of eoch of the
Poge 174of356

olternotives first for totol construction cost, then for cost plus soft costs, ond then the
discounted (present volue) cost. Column Nos, .l0, I l, ond l2 identify the cost index
relotive to the cost of ony one porticulor olternotive in comporison to the lowest cost
qlternotive,
The lowest cost olternotive is Alternqtive 28, which includes o single-phose construction
of o new focility coupled with leosing spoce for generol office requirements for the
Public Defender ond the Alternotive Public Defender (o totol of 40,000 squore feet),
Alternotive 28 is the lowest cost becouse initiol construction in one phose minimizes the
inflotionory impoct of constructing o building in multiple phoses in future yeors ond
cooitolizes on economies to scole, lt is olso the most cost effective becouse, with the
Present Volue Anolysis ossuming o fixed rentol rote for the portion of the leose rote
reloted to debt omorlizotion qnd tox-exempt finoncing being utilized by the developer
for thot portion of the focility occupied ond potentiolly eventuolly owned by the
County, the present volue (with substontiol future discount) of leosing spoce is more
cost effective thon new construction in o higher cost focility developed to court
stondords thon the cost thot would be incurred by o developer in o Closs A- urbon
office building,
C. Evoluofion
Some generol conclusions derived from o review of the life-cycle costs ossocioted with
olternotives include:
r)
2)
?\
4)
6\
It is better to construct o lorger building in Phose I thon o two-phose building in
two phoses,
Construction on One South Sierro hos o greoter unit cost (bosed upon on
ossumption thot unit cost begins qt $45O/squore foot for o building of the some
quolity os we ore getting ot-grode for S2OO/squore foot,
Becouse of the present volue foctor onolysis (67") rt is cheoper to leose spoce for
the Public Defender ond the APD thon to construct thot spoce os long os it con
be provided by o developer in o condominium ossociotion utilizing tox-exempt
finoncing,
The most cost effective olternotive is to retoin the .l965 Addition, which is more
cost effective to renovote, incorporote deferred mointenonce, ond poy o
slightly higher onnuol energy cost thon it is to construct replocement spoce ond
then poy for the demolition ond ultimote replocement of existing focilities.
It is more economicol to construct new spoce on on odjocent site (Court Street
ond/or the Pioneer site) thon it is to develop on equol omount of spoce
providing similor interior occommodotions for courts ond support spoce on top
of the existing One South Sierro focility, Chopter 8 identifies the difficulties
ossocioted with odding two or three floors to One South Sierro, the disruption thot
would be involved in thot verticol construction, ond the substontiol code ond fire
life sofety issues thot would hove to be resolved, Construction premiums for
Poge 175of356

odding two floors to One South Sierro would result in o unit construction cost of
obout 5450 per GSF os compored to $300 to $400 per squore feet for new
construction on on odjocent site thot would be linked to the Historic Courthouse,
The cost of tempororily relocoting oll of the occuponts of the third floor of One
South Sierro to spoce thot is eorlier constructed odjocent to the Historic
Courthouse is estimoted of o $560,000 temporory relocotion premium,
6) lt is slightly more economicol to leose spoce for generol offices thon it would be
to construct equivolent spoce in o court building, The primory reosons for this
include:
o) A developer building would not necessorily be developed to the some
stondord os o courfhouse (or os on essentiol focility) ond thus the developer
would enjoy o construction cost thot would be of leost 20% less thon
encountered by the County in the development of o court building, This is
not to soy thot the County could not couse to be developed o generol
purpose office building within o block or two of the Courthouse on Countyowned
lond thot would be developed to o similor stondord, probobly
developed utilizing o design/build delivery system,
b) A generol-purpose office building would be more efficient in terms of rqtio of
net-to-gross oreo thon o courthouse, A proboble sovings in gross
construction oreo of l5% would result,
d)
e)
We ossumed thot the developer could obtoin tox-exempt finoncing for thot
portion of the focility thqt would be leosed long term to the County, thus
eliminoting the finoncing penolty usuolly found in o comporison of the cost of
ownership versus leosing for publicly occupied focilities.
We ossumed thot o developer would offer the County o "below morket"
deol os the County would be "seeding" the building ond ossisting the
developer in obtoining o sufficient level of occuponcy to obtoin toke-out
finoncing, Thus, we hove ossumed the County could benefit by o fixed rote
leose with no escolotions over the term of the finoncing of the project on o
triple net bosis ond the rent would include oppropriote ollowonces for
common oreo mointenonce ond mointenqnce, operotions, ond utilities.
One phose of new construction os opposed to two phoses is more cost
effective thon two phoses becouse:
i) Economies to scole of constructing one lorge building (for exomple - o
200,000 GSF building) os opposed to building the some 200,000 GSF in
increments of .|20,000 GSF followed by on odditionql 80,000 GSF mony
yeors loter is of o lower cost;
ii) Avoidonce of the cost of horizontol exponsion premiums reloted to
portiol demolition to then link o second building to the first phose;
Poge 176of356

iii) Need to pre-invest in initiol construction of verticql tronsporfotion, incustody
holding oreos in lower levels, building infrostructure ond
possibly the entire mechonicol system to pre-invest in those systems to
ollow economicol future horizontol exponsion,
There is the further possibility thot constructing o building in one phose (os opposed to
two phoses of identicol size) would provide the County with o spoce resource thot
could be used to provide occommodotions for other County Deporiments thot could
utilize the exponsion spoce on on interim bosis, possibly for os long os l0 or 15 yeors,
until the courts require the exponsion spoce. thus off-setting leose costs thot the County
would otherwise incur, Alternotively, it is possible thot, even with tox-exempt finoncing,
thot some portion of the County-owned building developed with tox-exempt finoncing
could be leosed fo privote-sector.tenonts for o number of yeors without violoting the
tox-exempt provisions of finoncing lows, This could produce on income (thot hos not
been ossumed in the onolysis) thot could further identify benefits to single-phose
construction,
Upon review, County monogement indicoted there would be o preference to own qll
of the spoce occupied by the court-reloted tenonts ond thot rother thon leose spoce
in o to-be-developed odjocent building, the County would prefer to own thot building
ond/or couse it to be developed for the County portfolio, Unless o very ottroctive leose
con be orronged with o to-be-selected developer for the Pioneer site, onolysis of the
further olternotives will qssume thot there is no leose spoce ond thot oll spoce is
contoined within County-owned focilities, Thus, the nine (9) originol olternotives
disployed on Exhibit 9-l I were reduced for workshop # 4.
D. Alternotives For Workshop No. 3
For eoch of the olternotives we present the focility development sequence. Eoch
exhibit identifies the current spoce ovoiloble in the Judiciol Complex, the current spoce
required (260,000 GSF os opposed to the current inventory of 222,OOO GSF), ond the
spoce required with ond without leosing, Without leosing, the spoce requirement
currently goes from the need of 260,000 GSF in 2008 to 530,000 GSF in 2040 with
exponsion to support 45 judiciol positions, Eoch exhibit identifies building projects ond
notes the timefrome of thot construction, Usuolly the building projects ore then
followed by o relocotion of court octivities from existing spoce into thot newly
developed spoce, which then ollows renovotion ond / or replocement of thot existing
spoce, A few yeors loter, there is o second phose which is often then followed by
phose three ond ultimotely completion of the moster plon with oll spoce being
provided bV 2O4O.
Exhibit 9-l I identified for oll of the five "Stoge 2" olternotives being studies, o grophicol
timeline indicoting the sequence when eoch of the construction, renovotion,
demolition, ond relocotion projects is completed, This wos then used to further refine
the cost estimote, which tokes into occount inflotion, The cost estimote, os refined, is
provided in Exhibit 9-12. Detoiled budgets ore provided in Appendix E,
Poge 177 of356

EXHIBIT 9.12
DEVETOPMENT COST ANALYSIS
No. Componenl
Squore
Feet
Unit
Cost
Tofol
Cosf
fl.000) Phose Yeor
lnflolion
Foclor
Totol
Cosl
0,000)
Cost Plus
Soft Cost
I Renovote Historic Courthouse 33.000 sl20 s3,960 20 6 r.36 5,s86 s7,271
z
3
Renovote 1965 Addition
RemodelJoil
51.000
14,000
s70
sr60
a? 47n
s2,240
20 0
20 0
t.l2
1.12
3.998
2.509
s5.398
q? ?q7
4 Reorronoe One South Sieno 70.000 s30 s2, r 00 20 8 1.44 3.O24 s4.082
5 lnfill Porch. One South Sierro r r.000 s250 s2.750 20 0 t.12 3.080 s4. r 58
6
7
Add 2 Floors to One South Sierro
Demo
59,000 ss2.450 20 4 |.28 4r.536 s56,074
,l965 8
Addition
New Buildino on
65.000 s975 2020 1.52 1,482 s2,00r
.l965 Site r r 0.000 s38,500 2022 r.60 61.600 s83. r 60
9 New Court Tower - Phose I
o) lA
b) tB
200,000
r 53,000
e?nn
s320
s60.000
s48.960
20 2
20 2
20
20
72.OOO
58,752
s97,2@
s79.3r 5
a\.I 1^
.{\ 2A
e) 28
D34
105,000
2t4,OOO
r3r.000
r40.000
$340
s300
s325
)JZU
s35,700
s64,200
s42,575
$44.800
ZU z
20 z
20 Z
ZU z
,20
20
20
.20
42,84O
77,O40
51.090
53.760
s57.834
s r 04.004
s68,972
s72,576
o) 38 70.000 s370 s25.900 ZU 2 20 3r.080 s4r.958
h) 44 200.000 s300 s60.000 ZU z .20 72.OOO s97,200
t0
i) 48
New Construction - Phose ll
o) lA
b)tB&rc
160,000
78,000
52.000
s320
s370
)JdU
s5,l,200
t-; t
s28.860
s I 9,760
lrur
zv Z
2030
2030
.20
\.92
|.92
61,440
55.4.l I
37,939
s82,944
s74.805
s5t.2r 8
il
c)3A&38
Leose Sooce
o) lc
40.000
44,OOO
s390
$400
s r 5.600
$ r 7,600
2030
20 vrs
1.92
:: :,..,
29.952
17,600
s40.435
s23,760
b) 28. 3A" 38 64.000 s400 s25,600 20 vrs 25,600 s34.560
c) 48 3r.000 s400 s I 2.400 20 vrs 12,400 sl6,740
l2 Alternotive I A
t*
45,408 sr 96.30r
Alternotive lB t:l 56,224 s2to,902
Alternotive lC 57.912 s2r 3, r 8r
Alternotive 2A ::1 ?A q7?
Alternotive 28 36,223
st 84,373
sr 83,90r
Alternotive 3,A 82,402 s246,242
Alternotive 3B 202,740 s273,698
Alternotive 4,A r88.r08 s253.945
Alternotive 4B 189.948 s256,429
Poge 178 of356

F
ul
o
f
o
e,
('rl o
Tl e,
d.l or-l
e,
EI H
cn
=l gl
GI
E
d
€
oBo
Ez 3
Ic9
.. E
.[r I
f!E
P
o
4
qqqqqqqqqq9aqqqq
e9q999P9
:a E E H F a 8 A I I A s H I B a
169
lo@e
iESFCdhSiE
jqeq.!nf!.!.!\I\\r't
:€FffO*rOffOafffl-
6ABceeFeF4666
c6aiatssgBFB
fr
a Etr"BHBIaBEBAF
F6
@oa(:\q\iqi
Fd?j.icdde6EAs6
FEi6E6g*
O9OOOooOaO
iaaq{qr-4qq4q4qq4
1*B:'6::tr4*8-qa
586*56
nqqqqqn
raBsBEa
frBB8BB8
flABFABS
qqq
o60
3ie
38Ril $sE&8Rp=3=tt
i.B B S A * 3 B 3 8; A s 6 a B I gdaaeee
PRSSzgSTnA;B
66666696
FM
s .i ri ri d'j',;'j'*'vi'+'; di
frd-b
nor4^E\'li^qorq,gq.t
iaa-'a-'a5ia-'$i
affnQooo
qqmqhqqqqnqeq
qqqqqclcqqqqqqq
.osoaqqooho600
9q+^*.b.f;qf,hq1:+^
e6aa9
r'*i;ri'oFiic;
ee
6;6€ci.9j-e
oo6t
d+
aa88B8B8AA888AA
qqqqqqq
oe?o
6A-6d*6 b 6666
firidr;ird-i-;.di
flfr
qqqqqq'qqqqq.
66o*6ee0e0S(+6*6
:6hooqoo
: i.ri a Fi i -i i -i g ;
ootsFoflho
:frq66
oooeooeoooeo
oo6qoqEhho
' q q q
e6ffh
it t ff f t R t t E t t E t fi
I

EXHIBIT 9.I4
GENERAT SUMMARY
OPTION I B
BUITDINGS
TOTAL
AREA SF
TOTAT COST
$
UNIT
cosT $ /
Historic Courthouse 47,OOO s9,050.842,00 s192.57
.l965 Buildins Remodel 73,000 s8,552,873,00 sl l7,l6
Existino Joil Remodel 20,000 s2,513,325,00 sr 25,67
lnfill Porch on S Sierro 8,000 sr,469,902,00 s183,74
Courthouse North Tower 2 Floors
Addition 60,000 sr 6,482,839,00 s274.71
Phose I New Buildinq 6 F oors 140,000 s46,771,138,00 s334,08
Phose I New Buildino 3 F oors 10,000 s3,558,377,00 s355.84
Phose 2 New Buildino 6 F oors 62,000 s21,216,51 2,00 s342.20
Phose 2 New Buildino 6 F oors 18,000 s7,190,720,00 $399,48
Below-Grqde Porking 48,720 s6,686,737,00 sr 37,25
Bridse 2,600 sl,746,462,00 s671,72
Sitework s2.907,550,00 s5,e4
TOTAT CONSTRUCTION COST 489.320 s128.r47.277.OO $acr.sq
Poge 180of356
SF

E. Allernqlives For Workshop No. 4
Upon review of the olternotives presented in Workshop #3, Option 48 ond 4C, os
presented on Exhibits 9-.l5, 9-16, 9-l 7 ond 9-.l8, were selected for further development,
Recognizing thot the Fomily Court subsequently submitted projections indicoting o
requirement of community build-out for 38 judiciol positions os compored to the l8
positions projected by ihe Consultont, it wqs necessory to identify how Option 48 ond
4C could reserve sufficient lond oreo on the Pioneer site to ollow horizontol exponsion
should more thon l8 Fomily Courl Judges be required in the future,
Further, the Consultont developed Alternotive 5A thot would depict the most
oppropriote focility development option oround o projection thot would include
provision of 38 Fomily Court judge occommodotions, This olternotive, os presented in
Exhibit 9-.|9, develops o new focility, in three phoses, on the Pioneer site connected by
o l2-foot wide bridge on Levels 3 ond 4 to the .|965 Addition, Option 5A does not
reploce the .|965 Addition ond does not odd two levels to One South Sierro os neither of
these octions would enhonce the copobility of existing focilities to support up to 38
judiciol positions for the Fomily Courl
Further, the Consultont developed on olternotive in Option 58 thot ossumes the Fomily
Court, becouse of the lorge size of the potentiol requirement, would ultimotely occupy
focilities developed on on o yet-to-be-identified more "suburbon" site within the Reno
metropoliton oreo thot could provide sufficient lond resources to support surfoce level
porking ond occommodqte 38 judiciol positions requiring o totol of .l80,000 gross squore
feet in o three or four-level building. This olternotive reduces overollspoce requirements
to 313,255 NSF/444,000 GSF, lt is depicted on Exhibit 9-20,
With this reduced requirement for spoce, the new focility developed on the Pioneer site
connected only by o bridge on Levels 3 ond 4 of the .|965 Addition ultimotely develops
.l86,000 GSF, which is sufficient to support consolidotion of oll of the 2no District Generol
Jurisdiction Couri. The existing joil ond the I965 Addition ore renovoted to provide
court support spoce ond the three lorge, somewhot ceremoniol courtrooms in the
Historic Courthouse ore retoined for use by Generol Jurisdiction courts not requiring the
presence of persons in-custody - for exomple, probote, discovery, ceremoniql
functions, drug courl', ond civil proceedings, All three of these courtrooms
occommodote o judiciol chomber with secured possogewoy to the courtroom. These
three chombers ore not however oble to be occessed from below-grode porking
without troversing through public spoce,
Option 48 os originolly presented in Workshop #3 is depicted on Exhibit 9-.l5, lf this
olternotive wos selected ond it wos loter found thot more thon l8 Fomily Court judiciol
positions needed to be occommodoted, Option 48 would evolve into 4B-l os depicted
in Exhibit 9-.l6,
Option 4C os originolly presented in Workshop # 3 is presented on Exhibit 9-.l6, Should it
be necessory to provide odditionol occommodotions for the Fomily Couri, it would
evolve into Option 4C-l os depicted on Exhibit 9-17,
Poge 1Bl of356

F. Detoiled Cosl Estimole
A detoiled cost estimote wos prepored by the consultont teom utilizing the conceptuol
building configurotions ond is presented in Appendix G to estoblish the proposed
configurotion, floor plons, elevotions, foqode oreos, ond other quontitotive porometers
of the olternotives, The cost estimote wos developed for oll three phoses of new
construction ond for the interior renovotions to the Historic Courthouse ond oll three
levels of One South Sierro,
The cost estimqte increoses future costs to the beginning of construction of 3.0% per
yeor ond ossumes o 24-month timefrome for construction of eoch phose ond l8 months
for interior renovotions of eoch of the two buildings,
Quolity levels for court ond support spoce ond public oreos ore ossumed to be
compotible with the finishes provided in the Mills B, Lone building,
There ore o number of speciol costs included within this project, They include:
L Historic Courihouse Renovotion
2.
4.
Provide Linkoge to Historic Courthouse
Off-Site Utilities
Courl Street Closure
5. Mechonicol Upgrodes to Historic Courthouse ond One South Sierro
6, Bridge Linking One South Sierro to Replocement of .|965 Addition
A summory of oll costs to be incurred in the implementotion of Alternotive 4C is
presented on Exhibit l0-.l2. The cost for eqch component is first presented in terms of
2008 volues, then os infloted to the beginning of construction in o future yeor, ond then
reduced to its present volue bosed upon opplicotion of 5% discount rote,
The detoiled cost estimotes developed for mojor construction for this project ore
provided in Appendix G,
Poge 182of356

G. Description of Workshop No. 4 Options
Alternotive 48 - Adds two floors to One South Sieno, encloses the first ond second floor
"in-fill" on the front porch, reploces the .|965 Addition, qnd develops o new focility with
the closure of Court Street, This is presented in Exhibit 9-l5. Future exponsion copobility
to occommodote on increose from l8 to 38 Fomily Court judiciol officers is presented
on Exhibit 9-16,
Alternotive 4C - Also develops two floors on One South Sieno ond in{ills the porch ond
redevelops ond reploces the .|965 Addition, The difference between Alternotive 4C
ond Alternotive 48 is thot 4C does not close Court Street ond provides only o norrow
connecting bridge of the second ond third floors ocross Court Street to new
construction. This is presented on Exhibit 9-17, To support exponsion beyond 18 judiciol
positions with the Fomily Court, exponsion on the Pioneer site is developed on Exhibit 9l8
os olternotive AC-l ,
Alternotive 5A - Develops oll odditionol required spoce in new construction ond does
not expond One South Sierro or reploce the .|965 Addition, lt requires the lorgest
oddition of spoce ond reserves significont spoce on the Pioneer site, lt is presented in
Exhibit 9-.l9,
Alternotive 58 - Chonges the mix of the development ond exponds One South Sierro
os proposed in Alternotives 48 ond 4C but does not reploce the 1965 Addition, lt
concentrotes os mony courts os possible in new construction os is presented in Exhibit 9-
20,
Alternotive 6 - Reverses 58 ond develops o replocement focility for the .l965 Addition
but does not expond One South Sierro, This is depicted in Exhibit 9-2'1,
For eoch of the five olternotives evoluoted of this juncture, we summorize the spoce
required ond the spoce provided in new buildings ond building renovotions, The totol
NSF required in vorious combinotions of new ond existing buildings vories between
357,655 NSF ond 378,655 NSF in the most consumptive olternqtive, Option 6, This is
presented on Exhibit 9-22,
To further exploin the differences between the vorious olternotives, Exhibit 9-23 identifies
where eoch courtroom or equivolent judiciol position is locoted in the three existing
buildings ond new construction, When completed, this scenorio provides
occommodotions for o totol of 45 judiciol positions,
Exhibits 9-25 through 9-29 indicote where eoch deportment or functionol component
would be locoted within the Historic Courthouse, the .|965 Addition, One South Sierro,
ond new construction of the end of the moster plon timefrome in 2050 when
occommodotions ore provided for 45 judiciol positions, Spoce ollocotions were
developed to minimize shorffoll on ony poriiculor floor of the conclusion of the
timefrome, These spoce ollocotion models coincide to the building configurotions ond
development sequence os eorlier provided in Exhibits 9-.|5 through 9-21,
The development cost onolysis for eoch of the five olternotives evolving from Workshop
No, 4 is presented on Exhibit 9-30, Totol development costs (Line No, 48) ronge from
Poge 183 of356

$275,833,029 for Alternotive 58 to o high of $340,716,410 for Alternotive 4C, Loter, in
Chopter .|0, with refinement of spoce requirements ond costs, these costs become
5295,923,000 for 4C ond $263,268,000 for 5A, These costs olong with odvontoges ond
disodvontoges of eoch olternotive were deboted in Workshop No, 4 ond used os the
bosis of identifying the two finolist olternqtives to be furfher developed ond included in
this droft report for considerotion by the County Boord of Commissioners.
Poge 184of356

EXHIBIT 9.I5
MASTER PIAN ALTERNATIVE
4B
--t l
I )lJ
l-\
*€k-_\
n
I
l'\ I
L_i
-/ 1""""""""__-"-"'
J]
-----{
NTS,
lr
ti
tl
LL
I
l
\-\o-
\-=-\- I i lt )
I
-->--=-*l*--r--J-EH
F
I
a
Iq
t
.
--t
*l
i:nll
_-1!L___j
ll-*^-; n*-T--t
J ttlit H | |
i L*t, *l , L I
rtli rl*,U
| .retsr I crmsr | |
1 lilrClrol^afrlDTdarrcr I llmnl ,?innH
965 ADDlTl(l,l iryS JAlli
IEMOD€L JAJL
]N€ SCXJIH SIERfiN r0.00i 19.1.ffit
NFILi FORCII Ol'l 1 S. SiFRRA 6.00( 8 iol
\00 2 FtooRs ro ! s. $i€RRA
)LI.'S PENTHOUST 48,00t 6C.00{
}EMO I9E5 iIING&}DD FLAZA
i NLW'TIIEST FROIT t2.401 '103.4Sr
ICUAI TOlf\ER Cn :965'rllllc
:MTPRINT
)Ei/ELCPMENT C',1 PIS,IESR
ittF
A. PHASt ] 120 ( I EE{
Irl JSE O[' TIBRARY SPACI &
)C*ilPRtSS IAWLIBRAfiY 8,25r 10 cs(
1t OTAL N6T SqJARE FEE'' 357.S51 50r 2lt 1
---.s-
.COURIHOIJSE
xoafiToflH
: *.tt$E t
lDDt Floorg
!0,il00€&rn
: to;oF@ I tn*.
i8?ctr
Irs0glf,lfi
_l$s 66P-.:
Poge 185of356
Ia
Ia
a
fr_tr".-- ti
IL
L,-
l'
t/
i(
-
\---
I --'-
a"\\ lli'
la--=-l I
l--,vi I
L---J \**
fr---r---r-
\
tf\
i \./\
il\
ti
il
e
'.
/
\--.-...-.*
( r-,
'---JE!*c'"
lr
it
\L - .
\ r--
\1
\f \L\--fimt*f-'
Nffifi

EXHIBIT 9.I6
MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE
48- |
FI
---**
11i
- tl
I L---i
-l i l"*---i I
lrJl
-t
I
F
I
'o T
a
19€5 ylrNc & ACD pi.riA
rilrc#r: *rgt
-g-
PH$E3
? STORY
Itf,tLL poRcH
4,m0eslft"R
8,00 GsF
CSUTIH$J$E.
$snr,H rovvsR
tf{A86 t
imtFl0q6
ao,&Eqf,nn
i&.&88F l""*, t€'tw
't?,ffiBlFjith
;l8Jor 6cr
Poge 186of356
P*{EEFL'r I
-1.17 ACRES
I
jrymts J
r*-*
i
i "L,...--._

MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE
SL_J-*t
munrxoL:sE
l{oRn{Tov{€R
FI*NET
ttp? F!008S
t&r6f8f,frfi
,$IGY
NF rr p&OJ
r,u6 6SarFi-R
q@0Gsr
Poge 187 of356
PIONEER LOT
- 1.83ACRES

EXHIBIT 9- I8
MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE
4C-l
-'-l
lt I
Jil rlll
t:.i--tt
j
'-1
I
T
I
0
t
G
c&rfilf{ols{
l'loRlr{T0tItER
,,,F$lsE2
,o0?B00Rs
5AS0Sr{.R
.:Tr----] m--r_
Jl 4 '-, l I I I
-'r-rrl
r llli ll-."....J I
I t | ^lJ'I I
--{ '*7', il \
1*tr
.] -+lr= I I l-
gffibr
4r.0c
{tM}Jti.,rJqll
;NF SCX!TH SIFRRA 70.0$ 100.00t
NFITL PORCH ON 1 S. SIERflA 6.UUJI B.UU{
iDB 2 FLOORS lO 1 S. SIERRI
}LUgPEIiIHOUSF 48.0{( 60,00{
7 )EMO P,{T'JG 8 AOD FLAZA
t NEli!!!€ST '965 f RONT 56.@i 80.30i
louRT To!,rER ot'l 1965WING
:finTpRtN:i
JEVLL(]Pi ENI i.lFl C|-FJRI
ITREET Ai.lD P1ONEER
A FNASE I
E. PH45E |l 5t 1S
C PHASE I;I i3471 !05.00(
10 ]SE OF IIBRMY $PAC[ &
:nirpfrFsa | 61#t tftprtrv
IOTAI N'I SOUARE FEEI 44
*..-**--:::
br{/iiEfi
2STORY i
rtF!.r mRclt
4,00GsFtfLR
8,000 6sF
Poge 1BB of356
^n \/\#
n_l--t
/
Il
Itll______l
li
IL
L,_*:"-
:-T
i
I
I
i
L-
\

EXHIBIT 9.I9
MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE
5A
INiItL PCf,CH OI.I ] S SI:RRA
2 FLOMS TO 1 3. SIERRA
CqJRT TOffi.R CiI 19N5 WNG
t"*r*"r*-
I
a
!
t!
d
lf
It
IL
\* :'
:- t/
t\
i
l--
| ---
\__---
f----'r-r-
\ tv"\
t\\
li \
]l\
il
I L-"-*-
\--r---"H
--i!.lJq"-
{ r--'
tf
tl
\ L-*-._-
*u
\r-
\i
OPTION 5A: SITE PLAN NTs o* o0NORIH
Poge 189of356
--|

EXHIBIT 9.20
MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE
-t :t
rl
-\
ti
i
__J :
--..*i
*1
\._ I i \Nl -\:* -+--L--I
_-l
QR1C COUR'HO{JSF
mlnmlffiim
ffitEii-
lr
| _ ..*lgrt{cffi{.ryttr
n
T
NotSF
111
-:rr
C,o|ri? trEl
Gro6s SF
--tm
:}NF STXJTH SIERRA 70.00 t(€ 0E
5 NFil| pORCHOt{IS SIFRRA 6.001 B.{lq
\DD 2 FLOORS TO : S, S}FFR$
il | r-q pFNTcnl r(f
JWU 1SP ?TINU i AUU Fff
I IIFWTIFST FRG\]T
:fr]ETTAi€RSr 1965WNG
:OOTPRINT
JtvELU"MiH I W ts1UNtS
]IIE
A PIIASL 98.00 140.0G
B PHASF II
r0 JSE OF I.IBRARY SPACE &
lCtltPRgSS LA-.$ :-IBMRY 6_25 10.fl6t
L: OI.{LNLI S{IUA'tTTILI 313.2tr 444.SS
;HrsEr
2 STORY
f|tl PoRGlt
!OGSFJFI.R
s"00 GsF
Poge lvu ot J5o
Frr
-*-'-**)
tlr'l+-
1i It
(_,-__
/-::Y*
{t t\
I
l-< | -./
'u/ a*
{a\.
Sul-
(-l-r
tn\
il\
iL_
{tr'
iI
li
\ t__-*---1
\ r*-
\i
L,,.,**

EXHIBIT 9.21
MASTER PLAN ATTERNATIVE
N
\\
\ \ tr*ts"=<
.\_*I***-***,:)
fL-
E
llll li lJlJ \*:r-L
I lll couRTHousE ll I I l( ru.r.EY
l-riiii ;;il:il;ffi;
JillH{ -li #j ti\ I
|-,--il
f: I t
ir---rlili#l l_. r;fil I li \
co$'l'T{sisE Jll I
I Itlil couRTHousE $l li \i
t 7-------.- I ltl '
,'8,y#Iisfiffi qt ll \r r Jlri i i -...--
r I llr |]l .li L i I l5l |t*--
%|@ r-1\
@ffi-rft ---:\
_--) i li.
------ri 1r- -.., [-lr-.,["-
| I \ I l I ll ll ll l,;lil _"trF-" Ll rt I c--'-,1 I
jr rr j-J ll ll Il lJill . iir lil *4L
;l li tl--ll 'r,'#r\
-rl l- J'l ill#k :lJ a---TT/\
Flt s{t
i
-**-t i
t1
it
tl
il
;{-r -.l
I
i
I
i
I
I
I
i
J
?sroq?
r,8srG{Ffi.R
*t5,S0B8fi
',fo.i!00,€8f
OPTION 6A: SITF.?LAN ,,,, -,.,, ,,.,,..-..,., ,,,,,,..,,.,,,,, ,,, ,, , ,,,,,,.,,,
N.T,S.
Poge 191 of356
Piltsfl ,
rrfsti::::,
a"t1'rG$8R
1il$6as.F,:.
I'lOfllH

EXHIBIT 9.22
TOTAL SPACE RESUIRED
No. Spoce Component
Developmenf Oplion (NSF)
48 4C 5A 5B 6
I Spoce Proorom for 45 Courfs 352,529 352,529 352,529 352,529 352,529
2 Additionol Lobbies 5,000 5,000 5,000
3 TOTAT NSF REAUIRED (#l:#2) 352.529 357,529 357,529 357,529 352.529
4
5
Spoce Provided
Historic Courthouse
.l965
Addition & Old Joil
3s,000 33,000 33,000
65,000
33,000
65,000
33,000
6 One South Sierro 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000
7 Exoond One South Sierro 54,000 54.000 54,000
d Reoloce .|965 Addition & Joil 72,400 56,000 72,400
9 Judiciol Tower - Phose I 120.000 r 05,000 r 20,000 r 00,000 r 20,000
t0 Judiciol Tower - Phose ll 38,500 75,000 32,000 75,000
il Leqse/Other 8,255 8,255 8,255 8,255 8.255
t2 Sub-Totol NSF Required (#4:#l l) 357,655 364.755 371.255 36t.255 378.655
Poge 192 of 356

EXHIBIT 9.23
L,!':..
COURTROOM & HEARING ROOM ASSIGNMENT & DEVELOPMENT
{.}prirtns "t t}, 1{, 5 lJ
()prirtr't 5A {!}
[re:tei i-l--T-l
V-: -I-]-TLil
ffi
{}Jttittrr (i
fl]ur';,,., u,,,, ffilt',',,,,i' ,,",,,
l{l.u',,,
lTfl
t i.,,i',s t

EXHIBIT 9.24
UNKNOWN
Poge 194of356

3t,
z
o
F
o
-l
-l
.)l Al ul
o
o.l
r-l O-
El (n
=l I
Xl o
url sl
6s
z
o l-oo
c
c
q
e
G
z
E o
:
i
)
)
a
)
o
di o
1it
oc
5 |1
C
.9
c
,q
o
z
e
E
c c
.e
c
-
o
c
a
c
a
!
z
q)
o
o]
0)
O-
i;c
c
o
c
o Eo
O oOo
(
c
.e
o
o
Itl
Itl
c Ltl
o
o o
c
2
o:o
O
o
o
h
.q
E
o
!
C
6
o
o
c
E (
Io
!
c
=
€
O
i
-L Itl
l
ir
a:
i
3'i
fr
l
Itl
II
tfl
Itl
Itl
ll1
Itl
lll
lst I
l-[l
::
: [L
..q
tr
l::
iF :.:
q ) c
a
!
I
a
t
i E
E
c
a
E
5
c
z
.!
.!
I
c
a
t
!
q
f
!
'lll
Tll
t-iT
lll
J ^
'lull
#l-t;
"l.ll"
o
I
E
c t+
c t!
f>
5
o F
I
.o t&
fdq
oF
E
o t'c
t0
Ir$
c
z
a
!
c
.e
't
l
.E
.!
!
(
c
C
E
E
s
q
c
I C
c
c
TIT
slH| I
slFt*l
Elgffir
I t:tc
I tBli
I rnal
| 1::1
6
€
o
l
x
a
l
; \ N
\
:
5 \ t t
c
c
.e
3
o !_
z ,l
.a .!
.9
!
l !
c
(
E
t(
a
c
(
c
g
c
E
I cg
c
I c
.g
c
t cc
c
c
.g
't
:a
c
E
E
a
I
E
c
:
;
ii
I
iii
I
o ] ! o N
o
q
N
I
:
l t ]2
I
:
d
k
I )
il*I4, N : ? l
(
!
c
!
a
! e
0
c cc
c
=!
:a
c
I cc
c
s
I
o
0
(
0
t
g
E
e
l
)
o
l
c
c
c
lr)
o
|r)
G
c)
r1
o

€o
q
od €
o o
o ts
o
d
t
I
a
(
c E
F
; r c
@
o
E
o
IF
€
o
6 h
o
di
E
tr E
E 4
Its E
€d
6 E
tr
N€q E .,i
N
o ts
.i
q
n
n
?(
c
€
F
o
tr
tr
o o
E
ts
C
!
t
s t
(
t (
3n
z
o
F
o
oJJ $l 6
o.l
I-l O-
El 3n
=l E
url ol
o {z
o Foo
b o
Io l
o
a
O
z
o
o
o
c
o
:
c
.9
!
a
0
c
:
?
0
a
! a
(
(
a
l
o
a
9.9
o
O-
a*E
E oco E
U o
o
a
c
.e
s
)f, =
:
a
=
c i
o
N
@
N
I q
c
I (€
€
(
0
.!
:
.!
.!
I E
o
o
O
o
.e E
c
E
3t
v( c
N
o
N
) .1. I { )
c
E
c
e
E
c
c
I cc
g
-
I
q
E
i
:
3
E
!E
r!
:>
C ,:l:
E
;
F c(
s
1
e
c
E
c
o
z li N
* p
{
II
6 6
an
c
.!
C
c
c
!
c
: o 3 d
C
C
s
a
t
C
!
0
2
.E
!
C
.e
t
:
.t
.!
!
c
g
E
E
s
a
c c
a
N
9 t :
N
#
! co
a oO
g
N N
f N
o
I
!
)
t a.
I
0
c
s
t q
c
0
!
i
c
E
c
I
c
g
c c
c
e
c
c
!
E
e
t
ri
6 N
3 c
f
A
N
> I 6 N
a
z
e
c
(
c
.a
o
Eo co
O
.c_
'=g
UC
(
i o
N
N
@ 5
N 2t
O
E
e
t (v
a
t
!
t
a
I z
€
;
E
7.
0
E
; e
E
E
c
o
o
o
C)
n
o_

c
a
oq ld
lo
c
q
(
l*
o
c
o o
o
E.
-l o o.i
-l 6
6l
o
1
C
\N
o
I
I
IC
t.(
t(
It
l<
l(
t(
It
lu
a
.o
tr)
o
r-\
o q)
n
on

(n
z
o
F
O
o JJ
hl rrl s:.1 o
o.l
Fl o-
=t a
Xl url
o
sl
to
z
o l-oo
c
o
o
!
a
c
2
o
o
) \l N
6
l
lli
di
d
l
o a ?
N
a
6i
o
c
5 I
c
o
l
c
o
O
O
z
6
ci
o
.e
t )o
q)
c
o
c
q
z
a
t a
c
C
n
=
o
du
o
e
On
a*E
c
o
c
o
E o
O 0Ooo
C
c
c
.!
o
a
c
I
c N,
c
z
d
{
T
E
! l
O
6
o
O
o
.9
.E
E
!
I lo
O
N
6i
c
.e
c
.! E
I
o
o
C
c oo
i lo
t)
i
c
e
c
c
!
E
i
)
c
c
s
a
E
a
f,
q
z
c
!
I
f
>
N
@
N
o
o
;i
e
lt
? icq
(l
c
c
c
c
i
:
c
e
!
E
E
(
a
c
c
C
a
c
tr
N
€o
J o f l q N
>
o
z
a
I
c l
C
.!
i
.!
.!
!
0
c
I
E
E
q
c
!
c
I
t q
a
a
c
.e
E
E
c 0
C
I
s
o
o c o
C
icc T
c
q
c
s
o
o
o
o
O
c
o
; lc
Il,
ti
IC
I--
c
I
c
f
e
c c
s
)
I
;
c
e
c
0
C
i t
(
z
.!
.!
I
:
5
t
e
c
! c
t cc
c
c
c
E
r
tI c
F
t
€N
N
\
a
)
z 7
X
l
) N o oN
N c
N
o
I
z
.s
c
i cccc
c
.g
I
r
c
g
c
a
I
l
T
E
c
: O
o
a
N
a
c
0
v
t
! a
(
!
I
o co
b
o
,9
5 -c
o
N o l^
l3
q
I c((
a
7
a
x cc
I
(
.g (C
c
c
C
!
C
C
(
o
(-)
c l
o
Q
l*
o ) c N lc
l=
I
a
c
ol
\l
ol
-l
N F c
o )
;
,_
c
i o N
f1
o
e
-N N
o
=l
Iq
9
f o
Dq E
:l
>
t- 6q
l o
a o q
t
i
q {n o c!
i ts
N
o
>p- ;€
o qt tr
N
t o o
3 Io rt
D
3
d
z o
?
t
(
o
Iq
€
(
€tr)
G
o
h
-t
I

.n z
o F
O
oJ
-l
Sl u
o.l
-l o-
61 3t,
=l I xl o
url 6l
o|o
z
o to
0
I
!
)
c
o
a (
(
I
.! (
l
o
dr
o
e
Oxo
6-e
c
o
C
O
o
E
o
O
o
d
o
(
(
iI
c
o
z
c
c
cI
xc
JF
oc
c ,..!
:l:
L (
I
E
6
o oo
.c
.q
E
oc
c k t(
c
e
c
a
E
c
t(
a
c
c
I
a
3u?
v?
2
i( ! ls
a N
I
I
I
$
3
o
1
c
Iq
c
!
!
c
.a
o
o
o
b
o
o
E
oc
t
c
o
z
I
c
c
E
i
!
€
;
I ! _l
-l
(
!
t
t
: (
( (
a
C
a
C
c
(
0
!
a
I
il a
o
C
.q
:
n
.s I
E
l
i
c
(
C
(
c
(
.s
o
Eo co
ot
'x:
c
c
N ) I
x
{
!l
a
a
o
c €
o
!
E
a
o
c c
o
o
E
c
o
O
;
c
o
c
o
E
E
o
O-
OC
o(
9;
o
d
a
o
o_
o
N
g
6
t-
N
o
N
o
.o
lr)
G
A
0)
ah
at
o_

3t,
z
o
F
o
oJ -l
ql
.:.1 ul
o
o.l
r-l O-
3t,
-l
=l II olc'
xl o
url sl
I
z
o to
o
3 oo-o
b
z
E o
o
c
o
c
e
!
c
s
t
c
z
a
o
t o
=
.e
c fo
o
c
o
:
f
f,
0
a
!
(
C
I
O
O
O(
O
e
(
c
c
.(
o
c
N
N
N
I
c
€
{
: E N
N @
o
a € @ I I I
I
: 7
6
o?
1
)
7
{
c f, o
c
N t j
6
On
xo
a*c
C
o
C
o
c
o
O
OOo
c
s
c
C
C
E
E
C
(
{
0
!
E
:
!
i
t
z l
6
o
O
o
.9
.t E
!
i -o!
vc c
c
tr
c
E
c
c
! cc
c
g
E
a
I
.i N
o
c
E
f,
l-
q
:
c
e
(
.a !
'= C
f
E
.9 c
o E - 3
:
a
r
F
E
I
!
(
a
(
C
(
t
i
a
!
5
c
z
c
.g
't
l
?
E .e
q !
N o a
6

otr)
(f)
F
o
c!
q)
o
o-

EXHIBIT 9-30
DEVETOPMENT COST ANATYSIS
45 JUDICIAL POSITIONS
Nd )ildGmenlCfr@ned Unil Jnil Cosl
All€rnsilive
4t
Alf efl'rslive
4C
Altsn.dive
5A
Allerndive
3l
Alternd0ive
6
ol.rl SDcce DeveloDe.gAdcled Ff 264,936 vro.700 301o66 273.200 324.tOl
'l Judcid Ttrer PhGe I 5A I 72.866 $375 64.424,7 50
? r 40.000 DCYU 54,600,000
3 4B 172,866 $350 60.503.r 00
[1] 6.8 pcsitiorB per oddilimolsloilitr. $60.00qyecr. Fxesenl vqlue lodd of 20
l2l4 stotf . $?0.00wect.
Pr/ f odd cf 20
[3J Seporoile buildingF requte oddilimolspo€lq lobby. 2 buildingF t€quid in 58.
I 50.OOO s400 60.000.000
I 72,866 $37s $ 64,824,750
ludcid Ttrer Phcse ll 5r I 04-000 44.200.000
58 40.000 !+ou 20.700,000
4( s450 24.750.00C
I o I 08.000 s400 $43.200.0o0
t+Flo€ l 965 Euildinq 80.300 s425 34.1 !7.s@
10 ledoe I 965 Buildng 48 1 03.435 s400 4t ,37 4.000
ledo€ l 965 Euildna 6 1 03.435 s400 41.374.00C
)emdish 1965 Buildino 65,000 S2o 1,300.000 r.300.00c r.300,000
2 rdd 2 Flcors io OneSculhSieilo 60.000 s450 27_000_000 27.000.00c 27.000.000
:{ n-Fill One ScLrth Sierro Pcrch 8.000 $250 2.000.000 2.000.00c 2.000,000
letrDdd OneSouilhSie(o 70.000 s60 4_200.000 4.200.00c 4,200.000 4.200.000 4.200.000
ternodd 1965 Buildrng 5l .000 $r 00 5.r 00,000 5.1 00,000
lernodd Hbloric CoJd hoJs e 40.000 7.000.000 7.000.00c 7.000.000 i.000.000 /.000.00c
brued OclJoil lo OficeSpce I 4.200 $250 3,550.000 3.550,000
I lridqe lrom 1965 io OneSoLlh Sieilo 2-400 'I _000 2.400.000 2,400,00c
)iffeg Sile Lond Volue Cffiumed s40 I ,524,O00 1.s63.20c 3,01 4.320 1.655.280
20 treel ClGurdoftsils 2.000,000 500.00c 500_ooo 500-ooc
2t oncb oooe,tPl csc$ 600.000 300.00c 300.000 300.o00 300.00c
lelc^tr-Gode Pofuno. 2 Lareb 5' 150.716 100
?4 I 00.000 100 r 0.000.000
'| 5_071 _600
5t E?.7 64 100 $8.276.400
IlC 93,1 60 100 Y.J I O.US
26 I 50,7r 6 lo0 s I 5.O71 .60C
27 due Porkino Spflcs Req. Olf+ile 370
'r
3. r 3l .300
'I
3.574. q( 1 9,84?,439
'I
4.247.331 9,947.439
31
lompres Lffi Librory wilh Slocls 1.000 $ 500 500.000 500.00( 500.000 500,000 500,00t
Osklo Admin Cenls
"'love
fex. Mor.l 3_?55 s200 651.000 651 .OOC
e'npc|ory Rdoc(dion 600.000 600.000 600.000
33 nsrE lrom [ec6e spooe 130 Yrs] ST 9,000 $600
34 F&E 300.000 s20 6,000,000 6.000,@0 6,000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000
35 W, It. Dqto. Tedrnoloo,/ D I ,OUU r .275.000 1,275,OOO r ,275.000 1.275.O00 r ,275,000
36 )efe[ed Mcintencnce ?.000.000 4,000.000 2.000.000 2.000.000
37 \ddilDnol Spoce lor Addilonol Lobbis s400 2.000.000 2.000.000
38 .ifscvde Additionol Secudty Cc6f ll I eo 6,9 sr ,200,000 Lt 60.000 8.1 60.00c
,otKno lnoorne st 00 30 Yrs l;,..1u0.0c01 16.;rd4,43C il 1 .e,14.44c f5.f:19.;'dc fl 1.9,i4..140
40 iub-Tofol Conslrucfiqr @d 1171,22t,60 1r93.941.4m 316A.2Ar.60 5 r 63.635.251 5 rE9.l I 3.64t
41 lsian ll 0% * #401 t0% 17 ,12?,7 40
'19.394.149 16.824.967 I 6.383.524 I B,9l L367
42 :ee. Permits. lrFp€tion, Prcied Mqrrl 'il.985.9]e I 3,575,904 11.777.477 I I .468.46E r 3.237.95/
43 )lherSofl Cc5l.j 5% 8,561 ,370 9.6e7,O75 8.4',]2.483 e. t 9t .76! 4,455.683
44 )ens'Ctrriinqslcv 10% 20,889.743 :3.660.862 20,526,460 I 9.987.901 23,07 1,868
45 iub-fofal sma89?,4A 5 236.dt8.618 5?!5,264.396 I 199.E79.005 12l!,71A,676
46 nllctitr Fodo 40"/. 44+/. 36% 3S% 40%
4? nflcticn s3.558,97,l 104.107 .?92 73.895.255 7 5.954,O2i 92,287,4?O
a olal c6t s?'2/55,9) s340.tl 5.410 3279.t59,E51 s27S,Ett,029 I 323.00 6, I 47
49 )iones Srte Llilaed SF 38.r 00 46,580 75.358 4t.3Bt 75,358
50 toftinoSDoces Prcvided Under Euildirn 377 207 377
5t )okingSpocs Requitedw/500 qt Pioneel 751 757 757
rorkino Soce€ S horf oll 153-521 380 380
Poge 2O2 of 356

Poge 203 of 356

IO. RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
Poge 2O4 of 356

IO. RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. Finol Developmenl Opfions
From Workshop No, 4 the evoluotion of the remoining olternotives resulted in the
County selecting Options 4C ond 5A for further development, refinement, ond detoiled
cost onolysis.
Option 4C hos the chorocteristic of developing new focilities to support exponsion ond,
over time, replocing the .l965 Addition ond odding two floors to One South Sierro, This
option retoins the Fomily Court os the primory occupont of One South Sierro olong with
the Justice Court, provides o new focility replocing the .l965 Addition thot then links the
exoonded One South Sieno ond new construction ocross Court Street on the Pioneer
site,
Option 5A wos selected for further development becouse it minimizes the disruption
qnd exponsion of One South Sieno ond retoins the .|965 Addition with significont
remodeling ond moximizes the ovoilobility of courts through new construction,
This option could consolidote oll Fomily Courls with the Generol Jurisdiction Courts for o
consolidoted 2no District Court in new construction with the exception of two Historic
courtrooms retoined for the Fomily Court in the Hisioric Courlhouse if the six courts on
levels 3 or 4 of the .l965 Addition ore converted to office spoce for the Public Defender,
The Justice Court occupies One South Sierro olong with some odministrotive offices thot
support court octivity, The .|965 Addition is retoined, the existing unoccupied joil is
renovoted, ond the mojority of the .|965 Addition is utilized for court support octivities
including the Public Defender,
To minimize development costs Option 5A could retqin the three existing District Courts
on eoch of the third ond fourth floors of the .|965 Addition ond ollocote them to the
Fomily Court who con be more eosily occommodoted without hoving jury copobility or
odjocent holding for persons in-custody. This would minimize the cost of new
construction becouse new construction would include the equivolent 20,000 squore
feet os office spoce for the Public Defender os opposed the significontly more
expensive development of court spoce coupled with the demolition of opproximotely
20,000 squore feet on the third ond fourth levels of the 1965 Addition ond the
subsequent remodeling for the Public Defender, Alternotive 5A retoins this option for
considerotion,
B. Development Concept - 4C
After conducting four workshops ond review sessions with County stoff one olternotive
ond Court representqtives, Alternotive 4C os eorlier presented in Chopter 9 wos
selected os one option to include in the recommended moster plon to forword to the
Boord of County Commissioners, The site plon depicting the vorious components of
Poge 205 of 356

Option 4C is presented in Exhibit l0-.l. Significont elements of this plon include the
following:
1 Construction of o new 205,000 GSF building in two phoses linked to the existing
Historic Courthouse locoted on the Pioneer Site, The site exfends into
opproximotely 160 feet of the Pioneer site ond consumes ,9 ocres of the 2.79
ocre site to occommodote 45 judiciol positions, lf site oreo is to be reserved to
support ihe odditionol 20 positions forecost by the Fomily Court - then .|,74 ocres
must be retoined, This project provides one consolidoted secured entronce into
the complex ond o two level occupied bridge sponning Court Street. A feoture
of the project is thot pedestrion occess remoins ovoiloble olong Court Street into
ond through the new Courthouse, Access from new construction into the Historic
Courlhouse ond the to-be-reploced .l965 Addition is provided from the second
floor building connection occessed vio escolotors to Level 2 from the first floor of
the new Courthouse.
2.
4.
5,
6.
7,
8,
Pedestrion occess in on eost-west direction olong Court Street is mointoined with
direct occess into o "moll of public focilities", providing direct occess to the
Morrioge License Bureou of the Court Clerk, Low Librory (which moy be open on
evenings ond weekends), selected high-volume courl-support progroms thot do
not require controlled occess, the proposed Court Street cof6 (upgroded coffee
shop with outdoor dining omenity), ond o smoll compliment (obout 5,000 NSF) of
spoce to be leosed to compotible retoil ond commerciol enterprises thot hove o
relotionshio with the business octivities of the Court.
The existing 1965 Addition, totoling opproximotely 60,000 GSF would then be
demolished,
The current occuponts of the .l965 Addition would then tempororily relocote into
the exponded Courthouse to occommodote replocement of the .|965 Addition,
After demolition, o five-level building totoling 80,300 GSF is constructed generolly
on the footprint of the eorlier demolished .l965 Addition. This focility will olso
provide o bridge linking its Level 4 with o new Level 4 of One South Sierro, thus
providing contiguous secured occess between oll components of the District
Court os the District Court - Fomily Division occupies the fourth ond fifth floors of
One South Sierro, thus ollowing the Justice Court to expond into the spoce
formerly occupied by the Fomily Court on the third floor,
At this juncture the new construction replocing the .|965 Addition provides
occess to the exponded courts complex surrounding the Courthouse Squore
plozo oreo to be developed, Access to the exponsion from Phose I is
occommodofed through escolotor to o mezzonine level ond then ocross the
former locotion of Couri Street to new construction.
Add two floors to One South Sierro in Phose lll,
lnfill One South Sierro oorch on Levels I ond 2 olso in Phose lll,
Poge 206 of 356

9. Pioneer Site oreo con be reserved to occommodote o Phose lll oddition to
occommodote the potentiol long ronge exponsion of the Fomily Court beyond
l8 equivolent Judiciol positions,
Exhibit 10-2 disploys the configurotion concept for Phose I construction,
Phose lll is the lost increment to complete the moster plon ond it odds 60,000 squore
feet to One South Sierro, Phose lll olso qdds two levels to One South Sierro ond o new
elevotor core,
Poge 2O7 of 356

C. Spoce Allocqlions - 4C
For Alternotive 4C we hove developed o spoce ollocotion motrix in Exhibit l0-3 which
identifies the locqtion of oll spoce required, of moster plon completion, os provided on
eoch floor of the Historic Courthouse. One South Sierro. ond Phose I ond Phose ll of new
construction, This occommodotes oll spoce including leose spoce os provided in its
equivolency in Phose lll construction, which is on oddition to the Phose I Court Tower,
Core hos been token to minimize the splitting of o deportment on more thon one floor
ond never in two buildings,
Areo block outs for the exponded One South Sierro ond the new focility replocing the
.1965 Addition, ond its link to the Historic Courthouse ore presented on Exhibits l0-4
through l0-.|0, The proposed phosed development sequence is presented in Exhibit l0il,
The first construction project is o new Judiciol Center of .l50,000 GSF on the Pioneer site,
The project should be completed by mid 20.|4 ot the lotest, This is followed relocotion
of courts from the third floor from One South Sierro to ollow verticol exoonsion ond the
oddition of two levels for the ultimote home of the Fomily Court, This construction needs
to be completed bV 2A21 ond could be initioted os soon os 2017 os depicted in Exhibit
l0-l I if increoses in court requirements suggest intensifying the schedule,
The third construction cornponent con be initioted os soon os One South Sierro is
exponded ond the Fomily Courl moves bock into new spqce on the fourth ond fifth
floors, At thot time the .1965 Addition con be vocoted ond reploced with o new
building of 80,300 GSF, To keep poce with future court increoses ond to consolidote
support spoce from leose spoce, this project needs to be completedby 2025.
The finol phose of development is construction of the second phose of the Judiciol
Center developed on the Pioneer site, This would odd opproximotely 56,000 GSF to the
project with contiguous court spoce ond should be completed in the 2030 to 2035
timefrome depending upon the rote of increose of judiciol positions ond the need for
odditionol court spoce.
The finol development would be the in-fill of the front porch on Levels I ond 2 of the
One South Sierro building to provide on odditionol 8,000 GSF of spoce should
qdministrotive components of the Justice Courl or the Fomily Court require more spoce,
This would likely not occur untilthe 2040 timefrome,
D. Courhoom Allocqtions - 4C
The ollocotion of courtrooms for Ootion 4C deoicts Justice Court courtrooms on Levels 2
ond 3 of One South Sierro os depicted on Exhibits l0-5 ond l0-6, Fomily Courts ore
scheduled to occupy oll of Levels 4 qnd 5 of the exponded One South Sierro os
depicted on Exhibits l0-7 ond l0-8.
With the demolition ond reconstruction of o focility on the site of the .|965 Addition,
there ore no courtrooms contoined within thot oreo, The courtrooms on the second
Poge 208 of 356

floor of the Historic Courthouse ore retoined for the Discovery ond Probote Courfs of the
Generol Jurisdiction Division, All other courtrooms for Generol Jurisdiction ore locoted in
new construction on the Pioneer site, This distribution of courtrooms is further developed
in Section K of Chopter .l0, which utilizes Exhibit l0-28 to depict of where courtrooms for
the Justice, Fomily, ond Generol Jurisdiction Courts qre locoted in eoch phose of
development, A detoiled explonotion of the phosing ond ollocotion of courts is found
in Section K,
The ollocotion of courtrooms for Option 4C depicts Justice Court courtrooms on Levels 2
ond 3 of One South Sieno os depicted on Exhibits l0-5 ond l0-6, Fomily Courts ore
scheduled to occupy oll of Levels 4 ond 5 of the exponded One South Sierro os
depicted on Exhibits l0-7 ond l0-8,
With the demolition ond reconstruction of o focility on the site of the .l965 Addition,
there ore no courtrooms contoined within thot oreo, The courtrooms on the second
floor of the Historic Courthouse ore retoined for the Discovery ond Proboie Courts of the
Generol Jurisdiction Division. All other courtrooms for Generol Jurisdiction ore locoted in
new construction on the Pioneer site. This distribution of courtrooms is further developed
in Section K of Chopter .l0, which utilizes Exhibit 9-23 to depict of where courfrooms for
the Justice, Fomily, ond Generol Jurisdiction Courts ore locoted in eqch phose of
development for oll Options studied, A detoiled explonotion of the phosing ond
ollocqtion of courts is found in Section K,
E. Cost Estimote - 4C
A comprehensive, present volue of life-cycle cost (PVLCC) is developed for both
Options 4C ond 5A. The PVLCC for Option 4C is presented in Exhibit 10-12, which
identifies oll of the development components ond their costs on Line Nos, I through 26.
The budget for costs to be incurred, in terms of 2008 volues, is estimote ot $ I 89,373,974,
These costs ore distributed over the yeors 2008 through 2030 when oll projects qre
completed ond the focilities hove been exponded to support 45 judiciol positions,
Exhibit 10-12 further identifies building mointenonce ond operoting costs for existing
buildings ond new focilities to be constructed, Costs ore escoloted of 37o per yeor ond
then loter discounted of the discount rote of 5o/o pet yeor.
Option 4C con produce revenue from employees for porking under new construction
on the Pioneer site, income from the disposol of the surplus portion of the Pioneer site,
ond income from leosing spoce ovoiloble on the first floor of new construction for
foodservices ond other omenities for stoff ond court users. These income potentiols ore
shown Line Nos, 39 through 41.
The construction ond development costs shown on Line No, 27 is ossumed to be poid
for by bond or Certificote of Porticipotion (COP) finoncing oI o 4"/" tox-exempt rote,
The conversion of the current copitol cost (Line No, 27), which is infloted of 3% per yeor
to o future cost, is shown on Line Nos, 42 through 45, The totol omount to be finonced,
in four seporote pockoges, is $241 ,922,738, Annuol poyments for both principol ond
Poge 209 of 356

interest ore shown for the ensuing yeors through moturity of oll finoncing pockoges by
the yeor 2050 with the longest finoncing term being 30 yeors,
Further, there is o perceived inefficiency with the Fomily Court ond the Generol
Jurisdiction Court not occupying the some building, This is converted to the ossumption
there would be o need for two odditionql stoff oositions to overcome the
inconvenience of two bronches of the 2no District Court being in two buildings ond the
time inefficiency of moving bock ond forth between courts ond centrol filing offices,
The potentiol cost for on odditionol security post, which is opplicoble only to Option 5A,
is shown on Line No, 47,
Line No, 49 deoicts the totol onnuol cost in terms of future infloted dollors. These onnuol
costs escolote over time to $30 million per yeor, Future costs ore then discounted using
the present volue foctor of 5"/" to the present volue cost, which is then occumuloted on
Line No.53,
Option 4C hos o cumulotive totol cost over the next 42yeors of $877,897,000,
The present volue of this cost, shown on Line No, 53, is 5282,777,000, A detoiled
review ond comporison of the costs ossocioted with Option 4C ond Option 5A is
presented in Section J towords the conclusion of Chopter l0 of this report,
Poge 210 of 356

EXHIBIT I O.I
SITE PIAN 4C
Poge2ll of356
1.
a
J.
5.
o.
tr
n
tr
W
Flaua
hllstcric C*urth,:us*
Phese'l
Fkase2
Fhese 3
F{*tail 5par*

EXHIBIT 1O-2
srTE - oPTtoN 4C
ll
E
2 FLOORSTO t S. SIE FRA
I9E5IJIIIffi &IDD PLAZA
coumfiHE
rffiIiluiln
Ffti
..::mIRm,
OU.RIHOIIEE
SJIHTWIE
a$Ef lfEr
Poge 21 2 ot 356
t5
I
E J
rlatEt
d|Dq

t 16Cd
s
l0
EXHIBIT I O.3
oPTf oN 4C - 2050 SPACE ATTOCATTONS
.^.rdfr!bnrr nrnl
tdl 56
2,S2 2.S92 2.392
9.6
I5.63:
I] Judcbr- tririoo LAt c,a' 2i& 63 tal
.h'ff!A|1idEr*.
It 6_ t9a
3.!$
ta 5,66 366 666
p@hmlios l,674 1.6 E
2l 2,{1 ft
tlc 2.666
2b
s6 3.355
31 6.@0 4.a60
{te
t&l
96 trfibdmfta
69
3a 60
dE h|lu{Elubd
8.69 24,469
,q t69ai
2.425
621
i2 tsl
>785t 2t.0oa 2t frol
Poge 21 3 of 356
lt.fi
I
9.t6'
a,t6:
Ia.6l9

oPTfoN 48,4C, & 58
FIRST LEVET - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
Poge 214 of 356
FAMILY COURTS
HEARIffi MM
)::14 CCURI PROGRAII4s
JUSTICE COIFTS
LEGEND
W OPERATICIIs & ADMINISTRA'ION
ln coJRtJ
. BAILIFFI
OTHER
ftW IK
'iliI' PROAATE
: clvll-
az JtnYccnmrsDN
ffi Dlsco/Ew
cot\4MoN
PRETRAT SERVICES
@ COIJMYCLERK
*ffi FILINGOFFTE
ffi AOMIMSTMTION/SUPFOR]
I COLIRTTECHNOLtrY
I IAWI-ISRARY
HffS CIRCULATIoN,|CORE

oPTloN 48,4C, & 58
SECOND tEVEt - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
Poge 215 of 356
FAMILY COUFIS
HEAFNG rcOiI
W*. CO{jRT PRGRAMS
JU5'IICE COIFTS
: co|JFrS
I BAIIIFFS
OTHER
T TFC
ru PROAATE
I CML
: ,|.nYCOarmlSPN
: DIS

oPTloN 48,4C, & 58
THIRD LEVET - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
Poge 216 of 356
FAMILY COJRIS
HEARIN6ROOM
iI,fI COURTPROGRAMS
JUSTICE COURIS
LEGEND
W OPERAT IOI{S & ADfr|NISIRATIOf\.
I coumt
I BAILIFFS
OTHER
Sffi TFC
W; PffiIE
I Clvll-
i?'[ Jr.JRicoiiMrSDN
W DIS{CVERY
PRfTRIA! 5€RVEES
I AI'ERNAII\t STNTEI(INGy'DEFENOER
COMMON
ffi COUMYCLERK
* FITITIGOfFKE
*iit ADMINST RATON/SUFFO'RI
I COUtrTECHNOIOGY
I IIUI TBRARY
g$fi{ CIRCULAT|C,,IrcORE
i.-I ARFA

o-""---
o-
Gt--
(D--
oRur-
-
d \,.-
o---
oPTfoN 48,4C, & 58
FOURTH LEVET - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
G(
I
i I
I
I
I
d
i_.-mi
=il
1
L
I
I
H
i I
UIIILY SOUfrTs
?5:400 3Q, FI',
{29,1 5rl
it
L*oo*ro
lrr - t--t rr---
--il
i______i_*
Poge 21 7 of 356
I
FAMILY COURTS
. : HEARNG rcOM
61 COURTPROGRAM5
luSTtcE couHrS
LEGEND
ffi OPERATDN' & ADI\{NISTRATION
ffi.OURI5
] BAIIIFFs
OTHER
:::: PBOBATE
: CIVL
trjl JUPYConitfiSDN
#;. OIS'-O\{iR'(
PRETRAL SERVICEJ
N ALTERNATIW sENTEhf INq/DEFENDER
aOTMMON
rffiJ.OUI$YILERK
ffi FITINGOFFICE
}Si ADMINI5TRATION/sUPrcRT
ffi COURTTECHNOTCGY
J TAWI.IERARY
.,f];: c I Rcu LATtoNy'coFf
i::! AREA

EXHIBIT I O.8
oPTloN 48, 4C, & 58
FIFTH LEVEL . ONE SOUTH SIERRA
?P ?99
--+-- -iil
-'**-_--'+I _____._I_
I
ll
----t- rli
I ------ ---t- --
---*-+----- --r-****----1-**
Poge 21 B of 356
FAIVILY COUR'l5
HEARING MOM
i!.:::1.: COURI PrcGRAMS
JUSTICE COURIS
LEGEND
**fi4 OFERATNf, N' & AOMINIST RAT IOi]
ffi COJRT5
-
OTHER
IIL'I' TPC
BAIIIFF5
iiiii;; PnOBATE
I CIVIL
';:; JMYCOMMISDN
6f# Dl'.,WtRY
coMtvloN
PRETRIAI5EruE€J
:rl:r!'COJMYCLERK
WT FIIINGOFFICE
*,U ADMIM'TMNON/SLIPF''RT
& COURITECHNdGY
f IaA/IERARY
7;.)t { | RC U LATION,TCORE

EXHIBIT I O-9
oPTloN 48, 4C, & 6
FIRST TEVET - HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
-
Poge 21 9 of 356
FAMILY COURTS
HEARING RMM
]-:: COUR] P'IOGRAMs
JUSTICE COURTS
LEGEND
# OPIRATIONS& ADMINISIRATION
ffi COURTS
I BAILIFFS
OTHER
!rir: TPC
EIiJ: PROBATE
I (IVIL
; it,RY coMMtsroN
W DIS'OVER\
COMMON
PRETRIAT STRVICTS
#' COUNTYCIIRK
W FITINGOFFICE
# ADMINISTRATION/SUPPOR]
: COURTTTCHNOLOcY
I LAW LISMRY
::::::: c lRc u nTloN/coRE
i::J ARIA

EXHIBIT I O.I O
oPTloN 48, 4C, & 6
SECOND LEVET - HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
Poge 22O of 356
FAMILY COURTS
HEARING R@M
I,'JiIii COTJRI PffiRAMS
JUST|CE COURIS
LEGEND
re OPERATIC'!S & ADMINI'TRAIION
G CO{JFIS
I EAITIFFS
OTHER
?/I IP{
r** Ptr|EATE
I CMII
#-!: [nYcoMM'oN
ffi DTSCOWR/
COMMON
PREIRIAI. SERVCE5
,{#: Co|JNTVCI.ERK
T FILINGOf FICE
W ADMINISTRATDiUSUPPORT
T COIIRITTCINOLOGY
I LAWLIERARY
ffi CIRCUTATIOWORE

600
580
560
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
6 1^^
o r 340
$ rzo
E soo
o
e 2Bo
3 260
I
o 240
220
200
180
160
t40
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
FACILIry DEVELOPMENT SESUENCE - 4C
l-T-l-l conshrci r so,ooo sF
t2 2013 2014 20r5 2016 2017 20lA 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
rT'T-l
cu(eni NsF
Yd6
cutreni GsF
2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
shorifo | ..,..-.----. lse spoce
csrruct 60,000
-
sF fT3l--l constr@r 8o.3oo
-cu(enl
sF ITATI costruct 55,ooo sF TTtt--l construcr S,ooo sF
Poge 221 of 356

Itl
F
oo-
=) z
J
o-
d,
tll
F
CN
3n
te,
D
o
oFz-
Arl J -t o
6l o
Fl ul
El 6l
o
q, r
=l +l
Gl
=
F
C'1
c(J
IJJ
J
F
zIJJ
cn
IJJ
e
o.
O {z
c E
c FzIJJ
o.
c IIJ
IJJ
o
ob
E8
ct
e8
€E
-'6'
t
tcl
t9l
tJ oEc,
o
I
E
r
oo
oS
+vi
oo
ho
BE
OE
d3
()O 58
t,
!
i\
i\
t
I
6
N
c,
N
(,
F
|J)
c,
ol
-l
oN
o
N
ol
ct
ol
o
N
N
)
I
o
3
6
Be
c
E o
6
E
I
ul
n 0
U
E
c
I
8
E o
U
E
(.)
o
2
4
4
2
E
a
r
s
oto
o'
o
'r)
€N
o
ooa
o
f)
q
c
r o o
e a
r) (:
oq c\
a lr)
E
f
D
9. oa :!
D
o
c\
-@
N
oq
o
@
N
.i
a ,
so
) trnn
:\
fr
]{
l
a\
o
!
q
)
!
@
0 @ sl \
o ;
f,
a
n N
a
€
q
G
6
,
O
o
q
c)
o
I
5
o
c;
o
a
da f ? da ba
dj
de
q ba
o
o o
ofl o C C
N
3
!) o a
3
f
t
!
o
O
a
tr)
o
o
a) cL I (, n
.c. o
C o c C c
c
d o- O o O
6 c l f
'6 c c
o d o
8 U
l o
l
f
l
-i
t 1
2
t
l
t V O o o.
o
O
oi
c;
O
I
a
|r)
co
(r)r
O.
o
l
i
f nq ? I
9
ba q n ba a
c)
be
a dS q ba o fl t
o. )
o - s N N
c tr)
a \
Oq
O
CO
l
f
o
c
c{
N oN
tr)
a
o
a
O
c{
o
N
o
N C a
o
l
o
c{
o
N
c
o
V f tt
.C
/
s.:
o
q
3
N
o
q
{6\ a )
,
o
6
c
C
q
oq
o
<
O
@-
€
@
bA a
a a
o
be
a ba I
o bS
rj
N
c{ ) O
N
f:f
o
a
Oq
f
ft
f
: N
O
N
E
tr o F
q
n
l\
)l
l,t'
)
n
f,
i,
!.
o
n r:i
{ra
F
F
!
c
{
:\
c
a
t
:
q
:
G
[f
c,
::i
.{tiir
at
rd
'iai
itiit
rrll:
N o
m
Flii. v
G::: N
E:::::::=
*:::::= -
F...,1
o
@ o 6 d..;r(c
qc\
[*::::::s -
*:::::::=
*:.:::::=
I
N
q
a
aN
N
q
J
N
lr)
a
o
.a
-
q
o
e
8
C\
a
o
o
lo
tF
ts
lo
E
lor
lo
lo
lc,i
t;
l^
ll0
tu,
lo
o
r)_
O
q
be
a bS
a
cO
N O
O o
N N
l-
l.
tF
tF
l@
l.'
r
.l
i
,l
rll
R
;- <
;6
ot!lut";*'
ffiffi
'#lir# o.
**fut -
S:1,. -
btl,i
a F:rl:'l
w: '
E :3 .to
.f: !l
ta} ,: :
i
F f 4!
llrl
lr
':1',1
lli
lil
i* l:::n -
$.'N8
'/
-i4.
:).-j.:z:t:;:jii:i =-
ho
83
v,
f\O
88 ,l;
lliiiiliiili
rF
o o
N
@
r)
o
o.
@
C)
(r)
o
()
f,
T
T
!
N
sa
$
c!
a
o
o{
o
Oq
o
@ a
o
s
o.:
o
o
a
o
I
o.
6
@
oq
@
@
O
-a
o.
N
o.
a
a
o
a
sN
a
|r,
r)
oq
o
N
a
o
N
t (\
(\
! n
A
(\
o
(\
(\
o
n
N

IJ
F
o
o-
D
z Jo-
e,
tI|
F
3n
(r,
F
e,
:)
,lo
..o
6t r
ol z
sl a
6l o
Fl lll
@l :tr
=l o
*l $
6
tll
=z
F
z
o
F
cn
o
O
IJ
=-l
F
ztll
CN
tll
e
o-
o sz
o ho-
o FzIJ
o Jlrl
tll
o
EE
ct
o
.s
o
o\
s
o
N
o
!
o
N
h
\t
o(\l
€q
N
r0
!
!
il
fi
{o
N{o
st
o
N
o
(.:
(\
C
c
o
o
N
|.)
o
ol
rt
oN
o
o
ot
ol
(9
o N
(t
o
N
a
t
E
N
N
o
lr)
o
j
c
C
3I o
rr) -l OI a
tr)l *l
\o
\o
q
c{
f,
T
::
f !
@
N
c! c.l
N a
@
x nq c tr)
o
n

G CU
EXHIBIT I O.I3
WASHOE COUNW COURTS MASTER PIAN
DEVETOPMENT COSTS - OPTION 4C
$900,000
$B5o,oo0
$800,000
$750.000
s700,000
$650,000
$600,000
$550,000
$500,000
$4s0,000
$400,000
}JOU,UUU
$300,000
$250.000
s200,000
} I OU,UUU
(r nn nnn
$50.000
So
co o\, o
-
c\ cf) $ LO \o Fr co o, o
-
N,J) s- u) \o F- co G o
-
N cy) I (l \o N oo G o
-
c! cy) $ |.r) o N co G o
o o c\ c\c! c\ c! c!c! c\ N (\ cf) cD (,

@
f
U
EXHIBIT I O.I4
WASHOE COUNW COURTS MASTER PLAN
ANNUAT DEVELOPMENT COSTS - OPTION 4C
$30,000
$25,000
}IU,UUU
$r 5.000
) I U,UUU
s5.000
SO
A (I O C\ d)

F. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT - 5A
The site plon depicting the vorious development components of Option 5A is presented
in Exhibit l0-15, Significont elements of this plon included the following key
develooments:
l, Construction of o new 276,880 GSF building on the Pioneer Site, developed in
two phoses linked to the Historic Courthouse with o two-level bridge connecting
the third ond fourth floors, The site extends into opproximotely 300 feet of the
Pioneer site ond consumes .|,73 ocres of the 2,79-ocre site to occommodote 45
judiciol positions, Access from the new construction to the Historic Courfhouse
ond the existing .|965 Addition, which is retoined, is vio o bridge on the third ond
fourth floors, There will continue to be o seporote entronce to the Historic
Courthouse ond thus the cost of o second security position is included in this
olternotive,
2. The Fomily Court relocotes some of its courtrooms from the third floor of the One
South Sierro building to moke woy for exponsion of the Justice Court from the first
ond second floors,
{
4.
G.
The currently unoccupied joil in the .|965 Addition is then remodeled to provide
occommodotions for court support offices, court progroms, ond court
technology. The courtrooms on the third ond fourth floors ore reossigned to the
Fomily Court (there is on olternotive to convert this spoce to offices for the Public
Defender ond/or the Alternotive Public Defender ond develop new spoce for
Fomily Court on the Pioneer site),
The following yeors will see phosed renovotion of the bolonce of the '1965
Addition ond the Historic Courthouse to odjust to the occupqncy ollocotions
depicted on Exhibits l0-.|8 through l0-23 ond summorized by deportment ond
building ond floor locotion on Exhibit l0-'l7,
Additionol spoce to support o totol of 45 judiciol positions is then provided with
Phose ll construction, which is scheduled for the 2O28 Io 2032 timefrome, This
odditionol construction of .l04,000 GSF should be sufficient to then
occommodote 45 judiciol positions, Prior to construction of Phose ll, future courf
requirements could be re-evoluoted ond, if more thon 45 judiciol positions ore
forecost to be required, it is conceivoble thot the second phose of development
on the Pioneer site could be constructed to o lorger scole either in footprint or
with odditionol building levels,
Spoce Allocqtions - 5A
For Option 5A we developed o spoce ollocqtion motrix os presented in Exhibit l0-.l7,
These spoce ollocotions indicote the ossumed locotion for courts (shoded in green)
ond the required support spoce, Areo block-outs ore provided in Exhibits l0-l8 through
10-20 for the One South Sierro building, which is entirely occupied by ihe Justice Court
Poge 226 of 356

ond 5,.l5.l squqre feet for the Alternotive Public Defender on the third floor. There
remoins ovoiloble for future ossignment obout 1,531 squore feet,
Occuponcy in the Historic Courthouse ond the .l965 Addition, which is retoined, is
depicted on Exhibits l0-2.l through l0-23 indicoting occuponcy of existing courtrooms
on the second floor of the Historic Courthouse (three courtrooms) ond Levels 3 ond 4 of
the .l965 Addition, which occommodotes six Fomily Courts, The unoccupied joil is
renovoted for office support spoce to occommodote Court Technology on the third
floor qnd Pre-Triql Services on the second floor,
Options exist to demolish the six existing courts on the third ond fourth floors of the .l965
Addition ond develop those six Fomily Courts in new construction, In this option, the
neorly 20,000 squore feet on the third ond fourlh floors of the .l965 Addition would be
occupied by the Alternotive Public Defender ond o poriion of the Public Defender.
H. Courlroom Allocotions - 5A
The two olternotive woys to ollocote courtrooms in Option 5A ore depicted on
Exhibits 10-29 ond l0-30 ond more fully discussed in Section K of Chopter .l0.
l. Cost Estimote - 5A
The PVLCC for Option 5A is presented on Exhibit 10-25, which follows the some formot qs
Exhibit 10-12, which depicted the PVLCC for Option 4C, A brief summory comporison
indicotes totol project implementotion cost estimotes in yeor 2008 volues of
5170,687,607 (Line No,27), which increoses over time with inflotion ot 3%to $243,739,000
os shown on the combinotion of Lines 26 ond 27 ,
The totol three-phose project is finonced including infloted costs in three pockoges thot
totol $2]0,555,639 (Line No,46),
Over Ihe 42 yeors of onolysis, the totol cumulotive cost becomes $805,925,000 including
mointenonce ond operotion, deferred mointenonce, ond operotionol cost odjustments
(Line No, 50), The cumulotive present volue cost is shown on Line No, 53 to become
5270,196,000, A detoiled discussion of the comporison of costs between Option 4C ond
Option 5A is presented in Section J,
Poge 227 of 356

EXHIBIT I O- I5
SITE PIAN 5A
l
#un f
Lf
L]
:= .t
-Ll ul
I
tlli
til
E
3. r.-l
J
Poge 228 of 356
f-,
1t:
I
-
L__---
--:
a(
i
l---'__
1\
lq/t f_:J tf-rG
l\
l(7---',
t. I
z. fl Phase 1
Historic f,ourthouse
]. m Henavate
/l.W Phase f

EXHIBIT I O.I6
SITE - OPTION 5A
l
2 FIOORS TO 1 S- SIEFFA
196$ WNS & AOD PLAZA
L-::;F-
NTs u* OPTION 5A: SITE PLAN
ooNOfTH
{
Jrl,
Poge 229 of 356
'::,:.,:..,
,'"-,..,
:'
r|6t r{sf{RF,, ,
qctffffi*:rl
1f,ffifir,ffitr;*-;;*!
ll n*o,
ll tstw
I r4,$rff/Frn
I r$SoiI8F
rumccr fl
trrlq
rry \
|-l
nusr I
t8Tffiv
Attl:tr]E$,,:, ":::,.,
xmoffiw
noilEmto't
-1,ilACREs
| ffiffi
-L.-.-
() {l-'/
il )r--*-l
il#i
. ll*rl--J
as
r._
li It. l".^--
\_,--**
!l ltrulf
{t
l\
\*"'t;
{1\
lll'
tSJ l_
--Cryj"q-
( r----\
tf
ll-
1l
\r-,
\r-
\t
\r1
\L-"-"-
\-l

EXHIBIT I O.I 7
2O5O SPACE ATLOCATIONS
OPTION 5A
Poge 230 of 356

EXH|B|T t0-18
oPTroNs 5A & 6
FIRST TEVEL - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
Poge23l of356
FAMLY COURIS
?# HEtrINGffi
ffi coutrffirus
jUSTICE COURTS
I COUffi
: MLFE
otltER
*pc
# MATE
I OVIL
x ruftwrcx
) Kmft
coMrc|l
PiE?IIAL SEMTS
- couf,flcffi
I ErrcStrE
ffiilrsrfi^lFf{/summ
-
r c$frRnoffiY
r uwumfr
# cmulpllr'c*
t::i m
LEGEND

EXHIBIT I O.I 9
oPTroNs 5A & 6
SECOND TEVEL - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
o*-l I
Poge 232 of 356
FAMLY COURTS
::::::: ffimGW
ffi @urffiilMs
JUSI1CE COURTS
LEGEND
x mMnoN & AmrNEInATOil
I COUffi
I SAILIFE
OTl1ER
&ft
K ffiOBATE
I qv[
X JUR COilMIM
tr orscorcFr
COl,ll/lof{
runALStroE6
: c@fficffi
I FIUNGStrG
r ffitmmnEuP9om
I OURTTICMIOGY
I IAWUBRARI
5 oRCt UTTOfUCOnE
a::t ^na

,",) iil
-l
_. (il) .-
€)-r i
EXHIBIT I O.2O
oPTtoNs 5A & 6
THIRD LEVEL - ONE SOUTH SIERRA
_rcE
iFF:FFf ., ii
Poge 233 of 356
FAMILYCOUFR
,*. BEAMffi R@M
ffi c0ffiPRmMs
JUSNCE COURTS
OPTION 5A & 6
THIRD LEVEL
LEGEND
: OPEMIONS & ADMINISInANil
I COt ffiS
I EAILIFFS
OIHER
XTK
X PROBAE
I CNIL
# JURYCO&IMISION
.! DSCOVERY
PREInTAI SERVtCtt
I AITESMTMJPUBTK DTf ilDER
CON,IMON
f CdNIYCLSRK
T FILINGOFFKE
: CTFTIICHiIOI.OGY
I LAWUBMil
: oKUUTVCOiE
i::i AEA

EXHIBIT I O.2I
OPTION 5A
FIRST LEVET - HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
Poge 234 of 356
FAMILY COURTS
HARING ROOM
gi COURTPROGRAMS
JUSTICE COURTS
OPTION 5A
FIRST LEVEL
LEGEND
W OPERAT]ONS & AOMINISTRATION
W COURTS
I EAILIFFS
OTHER
:r... rP(
]:1] PROBAT!
: CIVIL
Ig JURY COMMISION
ffi DISCOVERY
COMMON
P RETRIAL SERVICES
$i: COUNNCLERK
ffi FILINGOFFICE
U,I ADMINISTRATION/SUPPORT
I COURTITCHNOLOGY
I UW LIERARY
+1:: ctRCUnnoN/coRE
i::J AREA

EXHIBIT I0.22
OPTION 5A
SECOND LEVEL - HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
Poge 235 of 356
FAMiLY COURTS
HEARING R@M
?ri: couffim%uMs
JUSTICE COURT5
ru COUffi
-
OTHER
8A[tfFS
Itrt TPC
E] Prc8ATE
I CIVIL
*:-;: JUfr COMMISION
m qscovEfr
COMMON
PfftTRAI SERVKES
g-J COUNNCLERK
ffi FILiNGOFBCE
ffi ANINI'RATIOUUPrcffi
: COUTECHNOTGY
: SWLIffiAtr
S'I CIRCULATIOVCORE
i::i AREA
LEGEND

EXHIBIT I0.23
OPTION 5A
THIRD AND FOURTH tEVEtS - HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
Poge 236 of 356
FAMILY COURTS
HEARING R(s
:I,]I COUffiPROGMMS
JUSNCE COURTS
LEGEND
T OPEM]IO$&AWINIsTMTION
I COUffi
r EAfrfFs
OTHER
tti Pc
M PrcgAlE
I CIVIL
,{t lutrcoMMrgoN
* DtscovEtr
COMMON
PRTTRIAISERVEIS
ffi COUNBCLERK
X FILINGOFFICI
M ADMNI'RATIOMUPrcM
I COUfiKHNOLGY
: UWLIBRAW
4 qKUUIIOVCORE
i::: AREA

o
o
3 Eo)
I I
o
600
580
560
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
2AO
260
240
220
2U)
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
20
WASHOE COUNTY COURTS COMPTEX MASTER PLAN UPDATE
FACILITY DEVETOPMENT SEQUENCE - OPTION 5A
0
2008 2009 2010 20r I 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2026 2027
curent NsF
l-Ttrl cmstructlzz,eeosl - @[ RendoteJoit2o,0oosF l-T3Tl com'trud]04,000sF
Poge 237 of 356
, l,ll* -a lm6 SlM.o
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040

tll
F
of
z
J
oe,
ul
F
.n
t,
F
e,
-|
o otz
Rt a
6l o
FI IJI
El o
6l :tr
cn
=l +l
Gt
=
F
cn
o ul
J
F
zul
.n
ur
e,
o-
|o
z
o EoFzul
ao
Jul
ul
o
ot
E6
cG oo
er
'8, O
co
-'0E E o
& ooto
E
oS oo
ttn
l-
col €

IJ
F
oof
z
S
oe,
ul
F
cn
CN
F
e,
f
_.o
,lo
6t E
Hl a
6l o
Fl ul
El o
@l E
xl s
oul
=z
]- z
o F.n
o oul
=J
F
zl!
3n
IJJ
e,
o-
lo
z
o EoFztll
=o,
o Jul
ttl
o
E3
c
|.
c
o
!
h
E
s
{
(
!
u)
o
N
o
rt
o
sl
(\
rt
t\
,
E
o
n
t)
n
s
n
.t
o
N
f,
tr
A
q
A
tr
A
o
R
E
A
(
(l
N tr)
€o N
ta) O
a
q
o
O
N
r)
o
c(
q
osq o
6
l N d)
|r)
a
n
q
I
l
n
!
a
N
o.
N
L.)
OI
c.i
-l
l
! @ co N o Nq
N
ro
r)
O o
f) 6
N()
N
c\
o
N
rrt
o
N
c)
o
N
N
a
r)
N
o
N
o
o.
da
O
$q
r)
@
o.
o
c.,!
a
sr) ro
a \
@
@
s()
N
+
'r) lr)
@
s
a N
q
o a
o.
co
e
N
'o\ N
o
-a
€
O
N N o
a
r)
o
o.
o
a O a_
q
o
q
tr) f \ @ a N
6
q
N
ii N
*i
:,i
a)
|f)
9
l)d
T
N N

c
-o
=
EXHIBIT I 0-26
WASHOE COUNTY COURTS MASTER PIAN
DEVETOPMENT COSTS - OPTION 5A
$eoo,o00
s850,000
$800,000
$750,000
$700,000
$650,000
$600,000
$550,000
s500,000
s4s0,000
s400,000
$350,000
$300,000
s250,000
$200,000
$r 50,000
$r oo,ooo
$50,000
qn
*.*-Annuol Developmenl Cost
Tolol Annuol Cosl
', ,"" Cumulofive Present Volue Cosl
Ioiol Cumulqiive Cost
., '*-
Cumulotive Annuol Developmeni
-.-i,l
,..,..1-,"gUfhitlqtivePresentiVolueCost ', ' i I : i
@ G O - (\ cO S'r) € F- @ o. O - C\ cD

c
=
=
EXHIBIT I0.27
WASHOE COUNW COURTS MASTER PLAN
ANNUAL DEVETOPMENT COSTS. OPTION 5A
$50,000
s4s,000
$40,000
$3s,ooo
$30,000
$25,000
$2o,ooo
.dt
,4?
#t
4i
Frt
,qi i
€i i
gi i
F: :
-s i--:
f.
€. :
$, i
.ft: :
ilj l
il
iil
iiil
:
fr.!!
i;,,' '4
-$
r i::
, t i$ , ,
;- . %u****lj 'i i
!,',-t t I 't ii% ,g*'*,.-.
t
i'
rtl
,ff
lt
i$l
--, S
]'H
i$
1i.€
---r--:--Er-'
I iFi
,F,
co o. o -
c{ ao $ to € N @ 6 o c..l d)
-
s ro € F- @ 6 o (\ (f)
-

J. Comporolive Present Volue Anolysis
A present volue life-cycle cost onolysis wos developed for eoch of the two finol options,
All of the costs of construction, renovotion, relocotion, mointenonce, ond operotion,
deferred mointenonce, ond ony incomes thot be received from the development
were identified throughout the moster plon timefrome to the yeor 2050,
PVLCC For Option 4C
The present volue life-cycle cost (PVLCC) for Option 4C, which utilizes new construction
ond exponsion of One South Sierro olong with replocement of the .1965 Addition, is
depicted on Exhibit 10-12. All costs ore presented in terms of current 2008 cost volues
ond then infloted of on ossumed inflotion rote of 3,07o to reflect their future cost for the
yeor in which the cost is incurred,
Mojor projects, for exomple - new construction, ore ossumed to be bonded of on
interest rote of 4,0% ond omortized over 30 yeors,
Soft costs ore incurred for design, engineering, off-site utilities, fees ond permits,
odministrotion ond project monogement to odd 23o/" to the hord construction cost, The
costs to implement the Moster Plon, for exomple - for Option 4C os presented on Exhibit
lO-12, ore increosed of the ossumed inflotion rote ond when summed on Line No, 49,
ore converted to o present volue cost by opplying the present volue foctor shown on
Line No, 5l , This produces on onnuql cost of the present volue of the future cost on Line
No, 52, This onnuol pres,ent volue cost is then summed on Line No, 53 to identifu the
cumulotive present volue cost,
For Option 4C, which reploces the .|965 Addition ond exponds One South Sierro, the
cumulotive present volue cost over the plonning timefrome is 5282,777,OOO. The totol
cost of Option 4C tor development, in terms of 2008 costs, is S.l89,373,944 (Line No, 27),
Over the life of the project, onnuol mointenonce ond deferred mointenonce
($.|,000,000 for the Historic Courthouse) ore shown on Line Nos, 3l through 37 ond subtotoled
on Line No, 38, which results in o totol life-cycle mointenonce ond operotion
costofSl3T,'1,l5,000,
Incomes ore identified for the volue of porking provided below new construction (line
no, 39), income received from disposing of the surplus portion of the Pioneer site (Line
No, 40), ond income expected to be received from ground level foodservice spoce
provided in new construction, (Line No.41).
The cost of construction of the vorious developments is converted to on onnuol
finoncing cost ossuming o 4,Oo/"inlerest rote ond o 3O-yeor finoncing term.
All costs ore then summorized into o totol onnuol cost (Line No, 49), the cumulotive
onnuol cost (Line No,50), the present volue of the onnuol cost (Line No,5l), ond the
cumulotive present volue cost (Line No, 52), The totol cost to be incurred over the 42
yeors is estimoted ot $877,897,000,
Poge 242 of 356

Exhibit l0-.l3 presents o groph of the onnuol development cost (construction projecis),
totol onnuol cost ossuming finoncing of 4.Oo/".interest, the totol cumulotive development
cost, totol cumulotive cost, ond the cumulotive present volue cost for Option 4C,
Exhibit l0-.|4 disploys the onnuol expenditures (which ore finonciol) ond the onnuol totql
cost,
PVLCC For Option 5A
Exhibit l0-25 presents the PVLCC for Option 5A thot does not reploce the .|965 Addition,
does not expond One South Sierro, ond provides oll required odditionol spoce through
new construction on the Pioneer site, In this olternotive the totol current development
cost is estimoted (Line No, 27) ot 5170,687,607, the totol mointenonce ond operoting
cost through ihe plonning timefrome is estimoted (Line No,36) qt $.l41,481,000, totol
omount to be finonced of $2.|0,555,639 ore incurred (Line No, 46), ond the cumulotive
cost (Line No, 50) is $805,925,000,
The cumulotive present volue cost is shown on Line No,53 os $270,.l96,000 utilizing the
57o discount rqte,
Exhibit 10-26 presents o groph ogoin depicting onnuol development cost, totol onnuol
cost. cumulotive present volue cost, cumulotive onnuol development cost, ond the
totol cumulotive cost, Exhibit 10-27 disploys the onnuol expenditures (which ore
finonciol) ond the onnuoltotol cost,
K. Courtroom Dishibulion
For eoch of the two development options presented in Chopter .l0, Exhibits l0-28, 10-29,
ond l0-30 were developed to depict the locotion of vorious judiciol proceeding rooms
in eoch phose, Exhibit l0-28 depicts the "judiciol proceeding room" (JPR) qllocotions
for Alternotive 4C, Exhibit 10-29 ond l0-30 depict olternotive woys to ollocote judiciol
proceeding rooms in Alternotive 5A, On eoch exhibit, "G" represents q Generol District
Court locotion, "F" indicotes o Fomily Courtroom or Heoring Room, ond "J" represents o
Justice Courfroom. We use the term "judiciol proceeding room" becouse some of the
spoces identified moy more oppropriotely be cotegorized os q "Heoring Room" os
opposed to o "Courtroom" given the obsence of odjocent in-custody holding focilities
ond possibly the presence of o smoll courtroom without jury copobility.
In eoch exhibit, the first ollocotion column shows the distribution of courts within the
four-level Historic Courthouse including the .l965 Addition ond below the distribution of
courts on the three floors of the One South Sierro building, The other columns depict
JPR ollocotions of subsequent stoges of development,
Alternotive 4C
The second column depicts occuponcy of courtrooms ofter Phose I of the Judiciol
Center on the Pioneer site is constructed, At thot time it is estimoted it will be required
to occommodote 27 judiciol proceeding rooms. Since Alternotive 4C hos os its second
phose, the construction of two odditionql floors on One South Sierro to ultimotely
Poge 243 of 356

occommodote qll the Fomily Court, the first development step relocotes oll six Fomily
Courls now locoted on the 3,o floor to the new judiciol tower plus provides two
exponsion courtrooms for Generol Jurisdiction while retoining occuponcy in nine
Generol Jurisdiction Courtrooms in the Historic Courthouse ond the .|965 Addition,
Prior to constructing Phose ll on the Pioneer site, two floors will be odded to One South
Sierro ond the Fomily Courl moves bock with occuponcy in os mony os 13 judiciol
proceeding rooms on the 4th ond Sth floors, At thot time, the Justice Court olso tokes
over three existing courtrooms on the 3'o floor thot were previously occupied by the
Fomily Court leoving three unoccupied courtrooms in toct on the 3'd floor for future use
by the Justice Court. The courfrooms initiolly provided in Phose I on the Pioneer site ore
then reossigned to the Generol Jurisdiction Court, which relocotes from the 3rd qnd 4th
floors of the .|965 Addition, This relocotion is required becouse in the next phose of work
the .1965 Addition is demolished ond reploced by o new structure thqt would then
provide odministrotive ond support spoce ond no courtrooms leoving only the two
historic courtrooms on the 2"a floor of the Historic Courthouse ovoiloble for use by the
Generol Jurisdiction Court, probobly for Civil, or of leost non-in-custody criminol
proceedings,
In the next phose of develooment, Phose ll of the Judiciol Center on the Pioneer site is
constructed ond occupied by court support components ond generol offices
relocoting from Phose l, Spoce previously occupied by support offices in Phose I is
converted to Generol Jurisdiction Courts, Additionol spoce is occupied to provide the
full complement of l0 Justice Courfs ond l6 Fomily Courts in One South Sierro, two
Generol District Courts ore retoined in the Historic Courthouse, ond odditionol floors ore
developed for Generol Jurisdiction Courts in Phose l, which ultimotely occommodotes
I I Generol District Courts, Long-term exponsion for on odditionol four courts would be
possible on the 2no floor if totol requirements exceed 45 JPR's, lf the long-term court
projections qre low, relocoting the Public Defender or Alternotive Public Defender
outside of the Courts Complex to leose spoce is possible to occommodote further
exponsion of courtrooms,
Alternotive 5A - Option I
Exhibit 10-29 depicts o similor scenorio for Alternotive 5A Option l, which relies on
providing oll future construction on the Pioneer site ond does not expond One South
Sierro verticolly or reploce the .l965 Addition,
lmmediotely ofter construction of Phose I on the Pioneer site, the building is occupied
by nine Generol Jurisdiction Courts ond five Fomily Courts, This vocotes the six
courtrooms currently in the .l965 Addition, Agoin this leoves two Generol Jurisdiction
Courts in the Historic Courthouse, One Fomily Courtroom on the 3'o floor of One South
Sierro is reossigned to the Justice Courf.
Over the ensuing 15 yeors, leoding to moturity of Phose I construction on the Pioneer
site, odditionol courts ore developed in Phose I to provide l2 Generol Jurisdiction ond
eight Fomily Courts os spoce initiolly occupied by support offices is converted to courts
Poge 2M of 356

ond those deportments qre relocoted to spoce thot would be remodeled on the 3'o
ond 4th floors of the .l965 Addition,
The second phose of construction on the Pioneer site odds o second court tower thot
would initiolly be occupied by eight Fomily Courts depicting some relocotion of Fomily
Courts from Phose l. The Justice Court continues to expond on the 3ro floor of One
South Sierro displocing oll of the Fomily Courts, At thot juncture, becouse Fomily Courts
hove o reduced relionce on in-custody holding ond jury copobility, the two historic
courtrooms on the 2no floor of the Historic Courthouse ore ollocoted to the Fomily Court,
Other thon those two courtrooms, the entire District Court is then contoined within the
two phoses of contiguous construction of the Pioneer site with the exception of two
Fomily Courts on second floor of the Historic Courthouse,
At community build-ouf the Fomily Court exponds within Phose ll ond some courts ore
ollocoted to spoce initiolly displocing office spoce in Phose L The Justice Court tokes
over oll courts on Levels 2 ond 3 of One South Sierro,
Alternotive 5A - Option I results in significont voconcies in the .l965 Addition during the
interim yeors ond is less copoble of occommodoting court support units thot would
otherwise require leose spoce, Over the neorly 40 yeors of onolysis, this olternotive
provides the equivolent of 650,000 squore foot yeors of leose ovoidonce copobility.
This is to soy thot spoces mode qvoiloble in new construction thot ore not initiolly
occupied by courts would ollow the cost ovoidonce of leosing ony combinotion of
squore footoge for yeors thot totol 650,000, Conceptuolly if there ore three 20,000 NSF
empty floors provided in new construction, this would provide 60,000 squore foot yeors
of copobility to consolidote leoses during the first yeor. lf this continues for five yeors, it
would then be o resource worth 300,000 squore foot yeors, This is o meosure of the
economic volue of the phosing of construction ond the continued utilizotion of
courtrooms in existing spoce.
Alternotive 5A - Option 2 is shown on Exhibit l0-30 which depicts the some building
progrom os depicted in Alternotive 5A - Option I but retoins the six courts in the .|965
Addition ond three in the Historic Courthouse ond ossigns them to the Fomily Court until
such time thot the decision is mode to implement Phose ll ond to renovote the 3,o ond
4th floors of the .|965 Addition ond remodel the joil to occommodote office support
octivities, Until there is ossuronce thot the projections developed in this report
indicoting o requirement for 45 judges ond JPR's to support community build-out is
oppropriote, it moy be wise to retoin the six courtrooms on the 3'd ond 4tn floors of the
.l965 Addition os o "contingency" ogoinst under-projecting os they moy require
octivotion os courtrooms if the County ever exceeds o requirement for 45 courtrooms
between the Justice ond the District Courts.
Alternotive 5A - Option 2 thus provides more interim spqce to occommodote office
support octivities - for exomple, Alternotive Public Defender, Public Defender, ond
possibly even exponsion of the District Attorney's Office, or other court support
progroms os it provides o resource of .l,675,000 squore foot yeors (SFY) of potentiol
leose cost ovoidonce, Alternotive 5A - Option 1 provides 650,000 SFY, The increose of
Poge 245 of 356

.l,025,000 SFY of o cost ovoidonce of $ 1 5 per squore foot per yeor represents o lifetime
potentiol sovings of $ I 5,375,000,00,
The difference between Option I ond Option 2 represents o potentiol volue over 30
yeors, of $512,500 in potentiol cost ovoidonce per yeor for on overoge of 34,000 net
squore feet which is very close to the omount of spoce required for the Public Defender
ond Alternotive Public Defender, Token over 30 yeors, this potentiol spoce ovoilobility
ond its cost ovoidonce hos on economic volue of over $.l5,000,000,
Poge 246 of 356

PHASED DEVELOPMENT COURTROOM ATLOCATION
ALTERNATIVE 4C
tiisloric
Court
I lou!c
Pbasc I
Pionecr
Phase ll
Itionccr
Site
'lbhl ('ourc 22
Rcquircd
(\trrcnt Corn
Allocilion
201{t
IJrrstice coun
ffilumilv Coun
f]Gcneral hrisdioion (irurt
lu,",n,
ffitur"rin L"r""
lnitial Pharc I
Occupancy
2013
27
Pilor 1o Phasc 2
Construction
t02l
t.t
Poge 247 of 356
r F $ F.i F F
F F F F F F F rii
J ) J ) I f;
) J J ) )
Uhimatc
Build-oilt
:040-2050
45

Histoilc
Corrl
Holsc
I South
Sioffa
EXHIBIT 10.29
Phase I
Pioneer
Sitc
Phare ll
Pioneer
Sitc
PHASED DEVELOPMENT COURTROOM ALLOCATION
ALTERNATIVE 5A - OPTION I
Iotal Couns 22
Required
Cucnt Coui
Allocntion
20t0
f,Ju;tice (lourt
ffiFanrily Court
flcencral
lun.ou,
OFFICES
G 6 G G
G G U G
F, In F.
oFHC'ES
JurisdicLi()n Court
ffihrcri^Lrot" lsavings of 650.000 sq. fi. )N.)
hitiol Phasc I
Yo'flo'"t
OFFTCES
u b b G
G G G
G G tr G
F-l F F F
Prior to Phasc l
( onstructlon
2.028
OFFICES
Poge 248 of 356
OFFICES
U U
G G G G
G u E u
F Fl F lfr
OFFICES
OFFICES
OFFICES
G G U
u G G u
u n G u
u G G u
G F
OFFICES

Historic
Court
llouse
I South
Siera
Phasc I
Pioneer
Site
Phse Il
Pioneer
Site
EXHIBIT I O-30
PHASED DEVETOPMENT COURTROOM ALLOCATION
ALTERNATIVE 5A - OPTION 2
Total (:oufls 22
Required
Curent Coun
Allocation
:010
L_lJuslrcc t ourt
fllFamily coqrt
IGcneral
lvu"ont
.Turisdictiorl Court
ffiIn "rin L"o". {savings of 1,6?5,0{)0 sq. it. yrs. )
Initial Phase I
Occupancy
201-l
OFFICES
g C G G
C G G (l
'%,
OFFICES
27
OFFICES
G G G G
6 u r- u
G G u u
OFFICES
Prior to Phase l
CoIstruction
2028
Poge 249 of 356
OFFICES
{J G G g
6 6 6
ti G TJ G
u u Ft
OFFICES
OFFICES
OFFICES
G G s (t
G G G G
G G G G
G G U U
F
OFI.ICES

t. Comporotive Cost Estimole
The chorocteristics of Option 4C ond 5A ore summorized for oll finonciol considerotions
on Exhibits l0-3.l ond l0-32. By oll meosures of cost comporison, Option 5A is slightly
more cost effective thon Option 4C with o preference ronging from 4.6"/"Io 8,9"/".
Exhibit l0-32 summorizes the mojor feotures of eoch option, identifies the totol built-out
oreo requirement represented by eoch, notes whot the proportion on the Pioneer site is
utilized for court development, ond summorizes oll of the finonciol informotion thot is
grophed on Exhibit l0-33, Initiolly, Option 4C, which constructs less spoce in the first
phose of development of the Pioneer site, hos q lower totol cost ond o lower PVLCC,
However, by the yeor 2025 to 2030 Alternotive 4C becomes more expensive from both
meosures os o result of then hoving to odd two floors to One South Sierrq, demolish the
.1965 Addition, ond reploce it to "cotch up" with the omount of squore footoge
developed in Alternotive 5A on the Pioneer site, By the end of the timefrome of
onolysis, Option 4C is found to be 8,9% more expensive thon Option 5A from o totol
cumulotive cost perspective ond only 4.6"/" more expensive from q PVLCC perspective,
Exhibit l0-34 summorizes the primory occuponts of Phose I construction, The exoct mix
of Fomily Court versus Generol Jurisdiction Courts hos flexibility depending upon
whether the six existing courts on the third ond fourth floors of the .|965 Addition ore
retoined for future court ossignment or the County is comfortoble with o moximum 45
judiciol position requirement to support community build-out ond the courtrooms ore
renovoted to support office spoce for the Public Defender ond the Alternotive Public
Defender,
Bosed upon this comporotive onolysis it oppeors thot Option 5A is slightly more
preferoble thon Option 4C from both on initiol ond totol octuol cost ond from o PVLCC
bosis, For oll initiol yeqrs but, by the time the project is completed ond occuponcy hos
stobilized, the totol cumulotive costs become neorly identicol ond the difference
between the cumulotive present volue is reduced to o difference of only 4.60/o with q
slight preference being given to Option 5A,
M. Sensitivity Anolysis
Eoch olternotive hos flexibility to increose the omount of spoce constructed in Phose ll
development on the Pioneer site ond ultimotely to relocote the office spqce provided
for the Public Defender ond the Alternqtive Public Defender out of the complex into
odjocent commerciol development thot would still provide proximity to the Courlhouse
but could occommodote odditionol courf develooment, In both olternotives the
Public Defender ond the Alternotive Public Defender ore ultimotely ollocoted obout
43,000 NSF, This is equivolent to two full floors of new construction on the Pioneer site,
which is configured to occommodote four courts per floor, Thus, in the long-term,
should the projection of 45 judiciol positions to support community build-out be found to
be low, two floors could be converted to occommodote eight odditionol courtrooms
thot would likely suppori ten judiciol positions ond thus ochieve o courts complex thot
could occommodote up to 55 judiciol positions,
Poge 250 of 356

For Alternotive 4C, if the court ond judiciol position projections developed in this reporf
ore low by the yeor 2O2O, the oction the County would need to toke would be to
expedite the replocement of the .|965 Addition ond then construct Phose ll on the
Pioneer site of on eorlier dqte, Alternotively, if the projections ore found to be
significontly low the decision could olwoys be mode to consider relocotion of the entire
Fomily Court to on olternotive locotion ond to reduce the requirement for court ond
support spoce in the courts complex,
For Alternotive 5A, if the long-term projections ore found to be low, the County could
olwoys expedite the construction of Phose ll on the Pioneer site ond/or to construct
Phose ll on o lorger scole thon depicted in this report, Further, the relocotion of the
Fomily Court to on independent building on on olternqtive site could olwoys be
considered mony yeors into the future,
lf the projections developed in this report ore on the high side ond the courts projected
ore not required, it will be eosy to simply defer replocement of the .l965 Addition in
Option 4C, not utilize renovoted spoce in the existing joil, ond/or defer or deloy or even
eliminote the need to construct Phose ll on the Pioneer site.
Poge251 of356

EXHIBIT I O-3I
PRESENT VALUE COST COMPARISON
4C 5A
L Totol Develooment Cost (2008 Volues) fine #27) sl89,373,974 s170,687,607
2, Totol Mointenonce Operoting Cost (#3.l-#36) s135.829.000 sr 30,320,000
3, Deferred Mointenonce (Line #37) s1,286.000 $r r,r6r,000
4, lncome Potentiol (Line # 39, 40, 41) s26,45r.000 s23.30r.000
5, Copitol Cost Finonced Gine #46) s241,922,738 s2.|0,555,634
6, Totol Finoncino Povments (Line #46) s735,289,000 s651,724,OOO
7 , Operotinq Cost Increoses (Line # 48 & # 47) s9,887,000 $r 9,329,000
8, Totol Cumulotive Cost (Line #50) s877,897,000 $805,925,000
L Cumulotive Present Volue Cost s282,777,OOO s270,r 96,000
Poge 252 of 356

EXHIBIT I O-32
OPTION DEVETOPMENT COMPARISON
Mojor Feotures:
Art 4c 5A
r Add 2 floors to l South
Sieno.
o Reploce l965Addition
r Construct 2 Phose building
on
Pioneer Site
o Construct 3 Phose
building in
Pioneer Site
Built Out Size 510,300 GsF 526.886 GSF
Totol Copitol Cost s286,036.000 s243.939.000
Adjustment to include Mointenonce & Operoting
Feotures
s406,587,000 s38r,448,000
Use of Pioneer Site 1.04 ocres (36%) L84 ocres (647o)
Phose One Size r50,m0 GSF r 72.886 GSF
Phose One Cooitol Cosl s95,673,534 st r4,778.000
Present Volue Life Cycle Cost 5282,777,OOO $270, r 96,000
Yeor Cosf Yeol Cosl
Phose I 201 r s95.673,534 201 1 $r r4,778,000
Phose 2 2019 s37.243,000 20r B s24.504,000
Phose 3 2023 s69,257,000 2029 s71,274,000
Phose 4 2027 s39,749,000
TOTAT 924t,923,ff)o s2r0,556,000
TOTAL Cosl wifh lnflolion $286,036,(XD $24i!,939,000
Number of District Courts 29 (25 new) 29 (19 new)
Poge 253 of 356

@
c
=
=
EXHIBIT I O-33
WASHOE COUNTY COURTS MASTER PLAN
DEVELOPMENT COSTS COMPARISON CUMUTATIVE AND PRESENT
VATUE
$900,000
S850,ooo
$800,000
$750,000
s700,000
$650,ooo
$600,000
$550,000
S5oo,ooo
$450,000
s400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$r 50,000
$100,000
s50,000
So
--1
-:.
1
-'-J
co 6 o - N cf)

EXHTBTT t 0-34
PHASE I OCCUPANTS
4C 5A
. District Court Administrotor . District Court Administrotor,
. District Court Filing Office
. District Courts (71,398 NSF) . District Courts (97,322 NSF)
. Pre Triol Services
. Centrol Holding
. Tronsportotion
. Sheriff Civil Office
. Public Defender . Public Defender
. Alternote Public Defender
. County Clerk Morrioge License
. Lobby ond common Areo . Lobby ond common Areo
Poge 255 of 356
. Centrol Holding
o TronsFortotion
o Primory Court Entronce

EXHIBIT I O-35
SENSITIVIW ANATYSIS FOR ALTERNATIVE 4C
PROJECTIO PROJECTION LOW FO
2020
2020
Defer replocing .l965 Addition
Remodel level 2 for Alternote
Public Defender
o Do not use 14,000 SF Joil
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR ATTERNATIVE 5A
. Defer Phose 2 consfruction
Poge 256 of 356
Expedite replocement of 1965
Addition, construction of Phose 2
ond ultimotely relocote some
Fomily Courts Offsite
oR-
. ldentify site for relocotion of
Fomily Court ond convert new
Courts in One South Sierro to incustody
jury courtrooms,
. Expedite Phose 2 ond consider
developing oll courts for in
custody, jury triols, ond ultimote
relocotion of oll or some of Fomilv
Court offsite,

N. lmplementotion Sequence
The sequentiol schedule proposed for the implementotion of either option is presented
on Exhibit l0-36, which disploys those tosks criticol to implementotion thot occur during
the first ten yeors of the plon, Tosks criticol in the initiol yeors include:
L It is first necessory for the Boord of County Commissioners to opprove the Moster
Plon, This is scheduled for the first quorter of 2008, Thot opprovol should provide
funding required to support Tosk No, 2.
2.
?
4.
A
7,
8,
Provide funding to initiote more detoiled implementotion plonning beginning in
the third quorter of 2008, More detoiled study would be conducted to
determine design ospects reloted to the linkoge of new construction to the
Historic Courthouse. Conduct furlher study of the potentiol to close Court Street,
ond the development of o building configurotion thot could ultimotely link to the
Pioneer Site Judiciol Center thot is developed in the footprint of the .1965
Addition. Study would continue through the first quorter of 2OO9.
Further presentotion to the County Commissioners will be required to evoluote
ond select option 4C or 5A ond to conclude the releose of o portion of the
Pioneer Site for privote sector development, At thot time, the design of Phose I
on the Pioneer Site con be initioted,
Funding opprovol is provided in 2009 to develop o conceptuol plon, schemotic
design ond detoiled cost estimote for Phose I construction. This would
encomposs the bolonce of 2OO9, Concurrently there would be furiher onolysis to
determine the best woy to implement the project ond to study olternotives of o
design competition, developer competition, design/build competition, or
utilizotion of o Construction Monoger At Risk (CM@R) procedure,
Yeor 20.|0 would see completion of design to ollow phosed construction utilizing
o CM@R concept or to develop bridging documents ond performonce
specificotions ond solicit competitive proposqls so thot o design/builder ond/or
CM-At Risk controctor con be selected to implement the project,
Construction is initioted in 20.l I ond continues through eorly 20.l3,
Following completion of initiol construction, those components occupying spoce
in the .1965 Addition ore relocoted to the new construction ond the .|965
Addition is demolished or remodeled if Ootion 4C is selected, the third floor of
One South Sierro is vocoted ond the exponsion spoce is designed ond
constructed,
Further efforts in future yeors then entoil construction of Phose ll qnd lll with the
sequentiol renovotion of the existing spoce in the Historic Courthouse ond the
eventuol renovotion of the third floor of One South Sierro to support exponsion of
the Justice Courf, These phoses con be initioted sooner ond loter depending on
how fost odditionoljudiciol positions ore to be occommodoted.
Poge 257 of 356

O. lmplementolion Procedure
We hove reviewed o number of olternotive project delivery methods to determine the
most oppropriote woy to proceed with this significont court focility development
progrom. lt is forecost thot the current slowdown in commerciol development will
probobly pick up ogoin in o few yeors ond we believe thot the 20.l I to 20.l5 timefrome
will see o slight resurgence in construction octivity ond o continuotion of the current
construction cost inflotion rote oround 47" per yeor, We ore olso concerned with the
obility of on orchitect ond o pre-development teom even with the best cost estimotors,
to occurotely predict ond loter to control construction costs, The history of construction
cost overruns for projects thot ore procured bosed upon o design-bid-build
methodology is unlikely to chonge in the next mony yeors, For this reoson we tend to
shy owoy from recommending the employment of o troditionol design-bid-build
implementotion methodology for this project,
We ore olso concerned obout whether or not there ore o sufficient number of lorge
generol controctors, mechonicol controctors, electricol controctors, ond steel erectors
in the Reno metropoliton oreo to provide competitive bids for this project under the
troditionol procurement process, Thus we explored olternotive delivery methods
including design competition, design/build, ond utilizotion of o CM-At Risk procedure,
The evoluotion hos concluded the following:
l, Desion Competition - A design competition without significont cost control will
likely result in o proposed design thot is inconsistent with eorlier estoblished
budgets. There ore olso o number of constroints reloted to the project ond o
requirement for numerous opprovols which connot be eosily defined prior to
initioting o design competition ond moy result in conflicts between unresolved
permitting ond building configurotion, historic preservotion, ond community
occeptonce criterio, ond o proposed design.
2. Desion/Build - lt is usuolly difficult to develop o court focility bosed upon o
design/build competition unless there is o highly defined bridging document
provided thot meets with prior court opprovol, Toking design development thqt
for into the process removes o significont omount of the potentiol benefit thot
con occrue in o design/build project becouse the configurotion, building
moteriols, ond structurol grid will hove been eorlier estoblished without benefit of
controctors' input ond volue engineering.
We olso hove concern thot with o number of deportments, elected officiols, ond
judges wonting to porticipote in the detoils of design, it moy be difficult to
resolve oll issues during o brief design/build competition, This would result in the
County owording o controct to the design/builder offering the opporent bestvolue
design ond then loter finding out thqt o number of odjustments need to be
mode to fully sotisfy oll of the judiciol requirements, Initioting o design/build
competition with bridging documents would olso require olmost os much time os
completing construction documents ond owording o project bosed on o
Poge 258 of 356

troditionol bid process, Thus there oppeors to be minimum schedule odvontoge
to utilizing o design/build delivery process,
3, Construction Monooer At Risk - lf o controctor wos selected bosed upon prequolificotion
ond then proposols including competitive business terms ond
conditions s ond then incorporoted into the design process olong with the
orchitect of the very beginning of design development there could be
moximum incorporotion of volue engineering ond constructobility considerotions
in conjunction ond the most cost effective design could result.
lf the CM-At Risk Controctor is then ollowed to occept bids from o number of
subcontroctors but to oword subcontrocts bosed upon best volue os opposed to
low bid, we believe the best teom could be ossembled, Conducting on open
book business relotionship with o CM-AI Risk Controctor who is under controct for
o fixed price for oll monogement, professionol fees, overheod, generol
conditions, ond profit, ond providing the Controctor with o shored sovings
opportunity con motivote the CM-At Risk Controctor to work os o portner with
the County ond the County's orchitect to provide best volue in the construction
of the courl'house,
Our preliminory recommendotion is to consider first engogement of the orchitecturol
teom to leod the design process ond to immediotely initiote o two-stoge process of
selecting o CM-At Risk Controctor to ossist during the design process,
P. Reloted Recommendqfions
Recommendotions for conditionol oction to support the implementotion of either
Option include the following:
L A decision must be mode whether the selected Option will be sufficient to
support 45 judiciol positions or whether odditionol site oreo on the Pioneer site
moy be required,
lf Option 5A is selected, the 'l,06 ocres thot would be ovoiloble is probobly
insufficient to be ottroctive to developers ond would result in the site lying
vocont for o number of yeors or be used exclusively for the development of o
porking structure to support the couri operotions, developed by Woshoe County.
As such, the development of the new court focility on the Pioneer site would
need to include development of initiolly o minimum of 600 porking spoces
below-grode with exponsion copobility to ultimotely develop 1,000 spoces to
support 45 judiciol positions ond ultimotely up to .|,300 porking spoces to support
the more oggressive projection of 38 judiciol positions for the Fomily Court, which
when combined with the other courts would result in o totol of 65 judiciol
positions ond reloted court focilities needing to be occommodoted in the
downtown complex,
2. With o decision mode relotive to No. I obove, it moy then be necessory for the
County to secure on odditionol site to provide the 400 porking spoces thot ore
Poge 259 of 356

{
4,
required obove the 500 thot would be occommodoted by the developer of the
Pioneer site (if sufficient lond oreo is ovoiloble on the Pioneer site to ottroct thot
development), Thot site should be opproximotely ,8 ocres ond be configured to
occommodote on efficient obove-grode porking structure, This would meon o
footprint with one dimension of the site being o minimum of .l90 feet of buildoble
footprint, Site oreo beyond 35,000 squore feet buildoble would be oppropriote if
it wos the County's desire to comoufloge its portion of the porking focility with
retoil or office spoce on one or more sides, lt is recommended o site oppropriote
to provide porking for stoff within three blocks of the Courthouse be ocquired
ond held in reserve for thot timefrome in the distont future when porking
requirements will exceed the current inventory ond whotever porking spoces ore
provided by the developer of the Pioneer site,
The County should work the City of Reno to remove porking from Sieno Street
from the Truckee River to Court Street. to norrow the street to two lones in one
direction olus o drop-off on the west side in front of One South Sierro.
The County should work with the City of Reno to evoluote the closure of Court
Street between Sierro ond Virginio Streets, We ocknowledge this
recommendotion is not supported by the City of Reno ond our troffic consultont
but do suggest it would result in the most beneficiol urbon design by creoting o
civic plozo in ond within the Court Complex, lt would olso significontly enhonce
security for the existing Historic Courthouse ond the proposed new construction
on the south side of the current Court Street on the Pioneer site ond would
occommodote one entronce to the combined Historic Courthouse ond new
construction to reduce qnnuol operoting costs
lf Option 4C is selected, Levels 3, 4, ond 5 of the replocement building to the
'|965 Addition should be offorded some view protection to the north,
Agreements with odjocent properly owners ond the City of Reno to minimize the
height of development to the north ond provide view protection should be
considered,
lf Option 5A is selected, ond the .|965 Addition is to be renovoted for courls or for
office spoce, it will be necessory to utilize the .l4,000 NSF ovoiloble in the currently
unoccupied joil. Further study of this renovotion needs to be initioted soon to
moke sure there ore not unforeseen mechonicol copocity or code limitotions,
Poge 260 of 356

ttl
F
oo-
-t
-z
-loe,
ul
F
C"
xul
J
oo
o
.n
F
e,
o
O
lz
-Al - dl o
6l o
FI |rI
El o
6l t
.n
=l +l ct =
ul
J
3
oul
-
O
U'
F
O
trl
-o e,
o-
I
o
o
!
o
o
o
o
6
€
o
s: o
= oo oo
{
q
!
s
!
o
E
I0)
c
I
p
9
o
N
o
c
'- c
d co
c
o
E
-a oE
c
o O
.e 0
E oEo-soo
6
E
o
.n
o
qo
6 c
E
I go
_o
o
e
o
c
.a
tr
E co
o
oc
N
o
c
o
.9
o o
.e o
6
o
E
.q
o
o
c
E
o
o
2 9
G
c
OP
E^
f9
_Qc
_o
os
od
6o
E9
n'O
ov
O
:=
.o
'o
CCdt
.9.99
o
OnOv < o
=<
U;UF
^G-6i
6:I:6
6 w,Y v
-
t v
- Y'.9
=.E.E@
se9e9
-oFox
9.09.S;
!-E-F
.9'X q?"x"" I X F
OU
-N
p
E O
s.e
RE
i= 89
o
o
@
o N
P
6
c
o
o l
5
5
'6o
o
'- c
co
Io
I
I o
o
d_
3
0)
o
e
O ;N
fo-
p
ir9
€g
lo
ox
oa
b3
gE
Ro
o 9
-;g
F:
I O--
('lJe
tr)
o
.o
N
o
o
o_

APPENDIX A
SPACE REQUIREMENTS DATABASE
Poge 262 of 356

Poge 263 of 356

APPENDIX A - SPACE REOUIREMENTS DATABASE
The moteriol in this section presents the consolidoted stoff ond spoce requirements for oll
court fomily deportments/divisions ond ogencies included in this Woshoe County Court
Complex Moster Plon Updote, These requirements ore presented on o dotobose form for
eoch mojor functionol component os well qs one form for those stoff ond support spoces
thot ore shored by oll occuponts of o single new building, lf these components ore
locoted in more thon one new or existing building, or combinotion thereof, the totol spoce
requirement could be significontly impocted,
A. Dotobose Descripfion
The dotobose form lists the stoff positions by employee clossificotion in the top bond or
block of doto, The numbers ot the for left in the first column identify the line item for
convenient reference only, followed by the employee clossificotion or position title, The
next two columns to the right provide o spoce code indicoting the type of office or
workstotion ossigned to thot position ond stondord useoble net squore feet (NSF) for thot
spoce, The next five columns, under the generol heoding Personnel/Quontity, list the
number of persons currently on stoff in 2007 ond those projected in the yeors 2020, 2O3O,
2040 ond 2050, The next five columns, under the generol heoding Net Squore Feet (NSF),
document the multiplicotion of the office or workstotion stondord NSF by the number of
personnel, The Remorks/Notes column of the for right contoins odditionol informotion,
when oppropriote, which enhonces understonding of the line item, The doto in eoch
column is subtotoled of the bottom of the block. circulqtion spoce is odded to ollow for
movement between offices ond workstotions, ond the totol NSF for stoff is colculoted,
The second block of doto on eoch dotobose (or the second poge wnere necessory)
identifies speciql qreos ond equipment thot will be required for eoch component qnd then
multiplies, in the some monner os in the upper block, the pieces of equipment, speciol
oreos or rooms thot ore required in eoch plonning period by the quoniity. The spoce
reouirements for eoch speciol room. oreo or furniture item ore then subtotoled of the
bottom, A circulotion foctor ollowonce is odded to provide spoce for movement between
vorious spoces ond equipment ond the totol speciol oreo spoce requirements colculoted,
The grond totol spoce for both personnel ond speciol oreqs/equipment is colculoted neor
the botfom of the poge,
The spoce codes for offices, workstotions, speciol rooms ond office furniture ond
equipment refer to items in the consultont's spoce stondords librory thot follows the
dotobose in this section of the report,
Two methods ore used throughout the dotobose to colculote the size of speciol rooms
where the contents ore identified, In some coses the sooce for the contents is odded ond
presented os o subtotol to define the entire spoce. In other coses the size of o room or
open oreo is identified os o stondord NSF thot is multiplied by the quontity, In this form of
colculotion the contents ore olso listed but spoce for eoch item is not colculoted,
The NSF in the dotobose indicotes only the spoce octuolly required within on enclosed
room or open oreo ossigned to o component. NSF does not include generol use stoff ond
Poge 264 of 356

public restrooms, building corridors, stoirwoys ond elevotor shofts, duct shofts, plumbing
choses, woll thickness or other building elements which ore port of the overoll building oreo
expressed os gross squore feet or GSF, However, some specific stoff ond public spoces,
which ore on integrol port of o component, moy be colculoted in the progrom where
oppropriote, Generol use stoff ond public restrooms must be plonned by the orchitect to
conform to governing code requirements ond included in the overoll GSF,
B. Terms ond Abbreviotions
The following terms, obbreviotions, ond ocronyms hove been utilized frequently throughout
the dotobose ond other documents in this report.
. Net Squore Feet (NSF): Spoce for offices, workstotions, ond speciol purpose rooms
ond oreos ond equipment plus internol circulotion spoce to occess them.
. Gross Squore Feet (GSF): NSF plus spoce for public ond/or stoff circulotion corridors,
stoirs, elevotor ond other verl'icol shofts, generol public ond stoff restrooms, structurol
elements, ond exterior woll thickness,
. Enclosed Room (ER): Office or speciol purpose room enclosed with full-height wolls
occessed through one or more doors,
. Open Areo (OA): Speciol purpose spoces without wolls generolly locoted in o
lorger room,
. Speciol Equipment (SE): Office furniture or equipment thot is not port of the
consultont's spoce stondords librory ond therefore not identified by o specific code,
. No Individuol Workstotion (NIWS): Indicotes on employee who is not ossigned to o
specific workstotion on o permonent bosis or who shores workspoce with one or
more other employees, In the lotter cose the workspoce is identified elsewhere in
the dotqbose.
C. Dqlobqse
The spoce requirements dotobose presented in this section of the report is preceded by
the Stoff ond Spoce Requirements Summory, The summory lists oll couri fomily
deportments, ogencies ond divisions ond units for which on individuol dotobose is
provided ond is linked electronicolly to them, Current stoff in 2007 ond those projected in
eoch plonning cohort over the 43-yeor moster plonning time period to 2050 ore identified,
The spoce required for personnel is shown in the some monner, However, the spoce for
2OO7 is thot which would be required if the spoce stondords used for other yeors were
cunently opplied. lt does not indicote the spoce thot is currently ovoiloble in the existing
Courthouse ond leosed or county-owned focilities,
The Stoff ond Spoce Requirements Summory on the following poge indicotes the current
418 personnel for oll court fomily components should utilize 196,229 NSF (line #36). When
the projected stoff reoches 882 in 2050 opproximotely 331,606 NSF will be required, When
Common/Shored Support personnel ond spoce ore odded (line #37), the totol 2050 stoff
increoses to 894 ond the spoce need is for 352,529 NSF,
Poge 265 of 356

STAFF AND SPACE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Deporlmenl / Division
Personnel Growlh
Role
07-50
Nel Squore Feel
2007 2020 2030 2rJ/,O 2050 2007 2020 2030 2040 2050
I Alternote Public Defender 35 58 69 3.6% 4.233 8.019 9.803 12.809 14,629
2 AlternotiveSentencing 7 15 20 23 27 3.27" 2.374 397 4.314 4.598 5.1 31
3 Countv Clerk 35 35 36 37 39 0.37o 4.458 4.486 4.U3 4.U3
District Attorney
5 Courthouse Offrc
0 0 0 0 0 o.o% 705 705 750 750 7ffi
6 Low Librorv I t0 ll l2 13 0.97" LU2 'I 1,835 14,294 r7.351 20,982
7 Public Defender 59 t0r 114 128 147 r 3.1 49 20.2M 23.O37 25.527 28.8s9
8 Reno Jusiice Court
9 Administrotion
l0 Boiliff
l l Court Operotions
12 Judiciorv
l3 2nd Judiciol District Court
Court Administrotor/Clerk of the
l4 Couri
l5 Administrotion
l6 Court Technology
17 Filing Office
18 Fomily Court Division
'19 Court Operotions
vvv,, |,vvtv,,'e
21 Judiciory
22 Temporory Protection Office
23 Generol Jurisdiction Division
24 Court Operotions
25 Discovery Commissioner
26 Judiciory
27 Jury Commissioner
28 Pretriol Services
29 Probote Commissioner
30
3l
32
33
AA
35
County Sheriff
Tronsportoiion
Centrol Holding
Civil
Courthouse Security
Office
7
8
29
7
3
5
28
22
12
l8
5
21
3
25
2
l4
3
0
t9
28
34
l8
ll
40
9
3
12
38
26
t6
27
5
23
34
3
20
6
0
aa
37
39
20
t4
47
l0
6
14
39
27
o1
33
5
26
4
37
3
23
0
30
47
A\
22
r5
53
t3
t6
AA
33
23
J/
5
32
A
43
4
aa
5
0
33
48
36 Tolol 418 593 582 776 882 r.8% 196.229 241.251 270.O25 305.359 3:]1.606
37 Common / Shored Suooorl 7 l2
'|
22
17
62
r5
't6
46
A5
25
M
6
36
4
49
A
3t
5
0
38
53
2.77"
r.8%
1.8%
|.87
1.6%
1.7%
1.7%
2.t%
0.47"
1.3yo
0.7%
1.67"
1.67"
Lf/"
0.070
1.6%
L5%
1.4%
4,066
2.718
6,214
19,775
1.762
4,559
r r,080
q t77
5,64
26,272
2,461
2,2ffi
1,248
44,921
2,852
3,3r 0
't.399
5,4U
2,795
3.78r
3.905
6,107
2,797
7,198
23,s86
1,762
5,283
12,371
6,123
6,317
36,734
2,461
2,394
1,3U
51,797
2,927
4,170
1,56r
5,8s0
3,708
3,890
4.206
6,979
3,022
7.907
27,200
2,374
5,U7
12,607
6,545
7,156
4\,438
2.594
2,616
1,362
58. r 59
? 1RO
,4.70A
t.sl
6,026
4.0]0
4,033
4,292
7,420
3.162
8.5r 4
34,303
2,392
5.75r
t3.242
7,578
7,626
48,265
2,629
3.048
|,362
64,531
3,227
5,334
'1.578
6,026
4,212
4,114
5.368
7.574
3,356
9,162
37.792
2,392
l2 (?1
8,442
7,947
53,64r
2,894
3.336
1,362
7 r.398
3,565
5,987
I.578
2,526
4,U2
4,259
5.464
1 lz 1,3% 20.758 20.820 20,923 20,923 20,923
38 Tolol Sloft ond Nel Souore Feel 425 605 694 788 894 1.7% 216.987 252.071 290.949 326.282 352.529
Poge 266 of 356

ATTERNATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
Employee Cla ssilfu ation 0
Special Ar€a/Equipmmt
Employee C lassif icatitrl
1 Altemate Public Defenda
2 DEuty Alternate Public Defender
3 Attom€y
4 Investrgatc'r
5 Legal Secretarlt
6 Support Specialist
? Interpreter
I Admnrstrativ e Asststant
9 Mitigation Speclahst
10 Chreflnvestrgator
l1 Socral Wodcer
12
TJ
14
Spae
Code NSF
po6
po4
Po3
Po2
w2
w2
w2
po2
Po3
p02
po2
16{
14t
12t
4f
4t
4t
1Z(
1Z(
12(
12(
PasmdlQuatity Net S quare Feet (NSF)
200: mm m! 204 m5t mo? ?020 2A3o 204,lJ 21150
1
8
2
2
2
15
16
1l
18
19 Crrculatrcn
35rA
olL 1.467 1.882
2,83 1
20 Total Staff and Square Feet (Perscnnel)
Special Area/Equbment
45 69 2.39e 5.659 7.25€ 9.353 10.919
21 Receptron Area, Seats 8
z2
23 Conftr€nce Roorn, Seats 2C
24 Confenence Room, Seats 12
lf worRroom
26 Mail Sorting Statrcn
27 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Drawer
28 Photocc'prer, Medrum, wrth Base
z9
30Et@
31 Industrial Shelurrg, Open
32 krdustrtal Shelvtrg, Open
33 WcrkTable, Access 1 Siddl End
34 Stmage Cabrnet, 2 Docr
35 Photocopier, Medium, wtth Base
36 Intemal Crrculabon
3'7 Tolal File Roorn
38
3 9 Investi gativ e Supp $/Stc'rage Roorr
40 Stoage Room
4l
42Brcak@
43 Krtchenette
44 VardingMachine
45 Dining Table, Seats 4
46 Internal Crrculatron
4'7 Total Break Room
48
49
50
ll
57
crl
c16
wr2
mssl
flc4
f' ?}
Y"'
$al
rsb 2
wtaZ
scaz
pc?
tr
kedl
RCOL
LeZ
192
48C
28C
zz4
24
l4
42
1
J'
14
42
2 5%
OC
8C
1'l
ll
l5
3U/"
1
1
1
2
5
z
1
I
I
I
1
1
z
z
1
3
lo
4
5
3
1
I
1
I
4
30
6
6
4
1
1
1
1
I
5
28
'7
I 5
I
1
1
1
I
6
)L
I
10
6
1
1
1
1
z
224
1,120
240
96
96
5 Cl4
2 ?4n
480
240
144
120
120
720
aai
672
3,800
't20
288
192
120
120
130
120
724
840
3,920
840
384
240
lZO
120
120
120
1,008
4 480
)J
54
55
56
5? Circulatrc,n
25%
JO/
509 691
58 Total Squar€ Feet (Soecial ArealEquioment) 1.835 2.360 2.145 3.456 3.110
59 Total Staff and Souare Feet: 15 35 45 58 69 4.233 8.O19 9-&)3 2.809 14.629
60 Soace Increase Over Currtnt Area 8.019 9.803 r2.809 14.629
I
1
1
1
3
?5
2
I
1
I
1
I
1
2
j
I
1
7
3
1
z
1
1
l
I
1
1
2
4
I
1
1
1
2
3
1
43
3
I
1
1
I
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
7
j
?
49
3
1
I
1
1
2
I
z
Poge 267 of 356
5
192
280
24
28
45
LD
38
14
42
41
206
100
80
'7'l
30
150
'7'7
192
280
725
/o
38
l4
4Z
86
431
100
80
'11
30
300
172
529
192
280
11i
48
n9
/o
38
t4
42
100
499
100
80
l1 30
300
11J
192
480
280
aai
48
42
4Z
357
39
38
14
42
.r-3s
650
100
80
1l
30
3't5
145
alt
960
480
288
48
17.O
120
120
Z40
192
480
280
liA
48
56
84
441
39
38
14
4Z
-Lg
?18
i00
160
'7'7
30
315
145
otl
RanarkiNotes
Staff proj e ctrons a ssrme
:crnpliance w/ ABA stds
1 rs Receptlon$t
Lrbrary and Confarence
Library and Conference
Coprer, fax, supplies
Adj. Support/Sec Staff
Walk-up co,piers
c ase files ftoxes) awaiting
bansfer bo off-site stmage
Filing,
copia supplies
Ctrrent SF =

ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING
Employe Classifrcation or
SpEial ArE/Equipmmt
Emulovee Classification
I Chief
2 Admrnrstratrve Assrstanl
3 HSSS
4 SuperuisrngAlt. Sentmctng Olllcer
5 Allernahve Sentmcrng Offtcet
6 Asst Alhmatrve Sentencing Officet
l I9
10
1l
12
IJ
14
15
Spacl
Codt NSF
p05
w2
wz
pD2
w3
w2
tvo
48
48
lZA
&
48
PEsmn€|./OlndtT Net Squue Feet (NSF)
zlt0i 102{ 2{t3( m4 20sl 2m? mm 2tBo 2[l4l 2t}50
'I
I
3
?
lo
lJ
18
19 Circulatron
5Oo/t
266 510 ooi '734 874
2D Total Stait and SquareFeet (Personnel) 15 20 z3 21 198 1.510 1.986 2.?02 2.627
Sp.esieLArslEsipusrl
21 Receptron Roorn, Seats €
22 Public Counter
23 ConfsenceRoom, Seats 4
24 Reslroom, Umses
25 DryCell, 1 Occupant
2? Weapon/Ammunrlon Locker
29 Coffee Statlon
30 File Cabtnel Lateral 4 Drawrr
31 Wonkrool
33 Briefrng Roorn
34 Mo!'ab le Tab le, Seats 2
3J Wmk Count€r, Access 1 Stdt
36 Stc,rage Cabtnet, 2 Docr
3? Podrum
38 Int€rnal Clrojlatron
39 Total Bnefrng Roorn
40
41 Lodr*Room
42 Lod

COUNTY CTERK
I
z
3
4
5
6
1
I
9
10
l1
12
14
ll
lo
1?
Employee Classifr[atim or
Spedal Ara/Equipmat
Emplovee Classilication
Cotuity Clerk
Chief Deputy
Office Supp crt Sp ecialist
Supcvisor
Office Assistant
Office Assistant Qlouriy)
Admin - County Commissrona
Deputy Cltrk County Cornrnrssronfl
Computa App licalicns Specrahsl
Deputy C ornmissioner Crvrl Marrragr
Pssmnel/Qmntity Net Sqrwe Feet (NSF)
Cod€ ,m ?-l2oro t?oso l;A-oTrosr 2m7 mm 2tBO m4 2(}50
p06
p05
w5
NIWS
niws
POZ
wZ
w4
7?4
Ivc
AC
96
lZC
48
8C
1
1
3
1
11
ll 1
i
I
1
18
19 Circulation
500./n
526 526 526 550 514
1U I OfAt NIaTr and souzre Fetr t Personnel i J] JC 39 1.5?8 l_5?8 1.5?8 l-650 t;722
Special AreaiEquipment
21 Pubhc Courrier.AtrIaihns Ar€a
22 Pub hc Counter w/Rehrm
23 Pnnter
24 ComputaTable
25 Tandem Seai
26 Public Waiting/Queuing
2? Public Crrculaiion
28 Total Public Countrr,MlarLrng Area
29
30 Cor,nter Staff Suplort Area
31 Slorage Cabnet, 2Door
32 Computrr T ab le
33 Mrcrofilm Reader
34 Scanner
35 Support Module
36 Safe
38 Admrnrsbahon Staff Suoocrt
39 Frle Cabrnet, Latcal 5 Drawer
40 File Cabinet, Vatrcal 5 Drw Legal
41 Bookcase, 5 Shelves
43 Support Module
+)
44 Mariase & Busness Staff Suonort
45 Mrcrofilm Reader
46 Opar Systerns Workslahon
4? Microfilm Sborage Cabinel 20 Drw
48 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Drawet
49 File Cabinet, Vertrcal 4 Drw Legal
J0 Industnal Shelving, Open
51 industnal Shelving, Open
52 Safe
5? ar nnnri ].rfn,4r r Ie
54
55
56
51
58
59
60
ot
oa
pcd2
ctal
cse I
oa
sca?
ctal
se
miel
ilcl
tub5
bca5
mrel
wl
mcbl
flc4
tub4
lsb2
isa2
se
miel
OL
IJ
24
l
15C
25%
1
2
I J
24
4
1
t4
1
4
5
3
2
25
I
'7
1
2
1
1
2
2
z
3
1
1
1
1
l4
1
I I
1
1
1
3
1
11
11
I
4
1
.t
3
7
35
1
'l
1
7
1
1
?
2
z
J
i
i
I
3
I
14
t
9
1
1
1
1
)
1
1J
11
I
4
1
I
5
3
2
z5
1
l 1
?.
1
1
2
3
2
3
1
1
I
4
I
l5
I
t0
I
I
I
I
I
l2
ll 1
5
1
I
5
2
Z5
ll
1
'7
'I
2
1
I
2
;
1
1
1
4
1
1
11
I
I
I
I
4
1
l)
ll
I
5
t
I
5
3
2
25
i
1
1
z
1
I
z
)
2
3
1
1
1
5
I
to
I
1Z
1
I
Poge 269 of 356
zz4
196
144
96
t20
192
80
300
39
48
1't5
150
805
98
24
?6
24
40
LO
LO
18
30
40
IJ
JO
Jtr
14
126
88
40
zz4
196
144
96
120
192
80
300
39
48
l-t5
150
93
805
98
z6
40
z6
z8
18
30
40
JO
JO
14
tta
IJ
99
IJ
40
196
144
96
120
192
80
300
39
48
1?5
150
93
805
98
24
z6
24
40
/o
18
30
40
IJ
JO
48
l4
tJl
IJ
110
t_t
40
aaA
196
144
96
120
80
300
39
48
115
150
93
805
98
24
ZO
z4
40
LO
n1
18
30
40
IJ
JO
48
14
135
IJ
121
IJ
40
?24
lvo
192
96
120
240
80
300
39
48
lt5
1J0
93
805
98
z4
LO
74
40
LO
42
18
30
40
JO
60
l4
144
IJ
132
It
40
RqnarkJNots
4,t Public Counter, work
nultiple shifts, ? days
ler stah.rte located off-siie
Jhared, counter statrons
fublic doorment vrewlng
:ax, pnmer, mlsc, equlpmen
rax, prmler, mlsc, equlpmen
Itaffwo'rk area
fubLc records
:Totary records
Manage files
fox storage
3usmess records
iax, pnnter, mlsc, equlpmen

DISTRICT ANORNEY COURTHOUSE OFFICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
il
12
tJ
14
Employe Classilication or
Sprial Ara/Equipmmt Cod( NSF
Emp bvee Classification
No permanently assrgped
staff- droo in onlv
1J
to
li
18
19 CrroJlatron 5lo/t
20 Total Staff and Souare Feet Ger:cnnel)
Sp ecial Area,{Equipment
21 Recepticn Area, Seals t
22 Wo,rkstatrors, shartd
23 Conference Room, Seats 6
24 Equrpment Storage
25 SupportModule
26
n
28
29
30
JI
JJ
34
))
36
Jb
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
4'7
4e
49
50
51
52
54
55
ra4
w1
cr3
ef
mrel
192
JO
144
80
40
PasolnevQwtiql Net Squile Feet (NS F)
moi NT m{ m4 ms 2tD7 mm 2(B0 m0 2t150
I
3
1
1
1
Itl
5? Cirorlatron
5S Total Square Feet (Specral ArealEqurDment)
z5v;
141
705
141
705
150
750
150
't50
150
150
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: ?05 ?05 1g 1fi 1g
60 Space lncrease Over Currerrt Area 705 705 150 t50 150
1
J
I
I
1
1
4
I
I
1
1
A
1
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
Poge 270 of 356
192
108
144
80
40
192
108
144
80
40
192
144
144
80
40
192
144
144
80
40
192
144
144
80
40
Rmaks/Nots
Fax, printer, supphes

LAW LIBRARY
EmployeeClasifiatim r
Special Ara/Equipmat
EmploYee C lassificatiur
1 T il,Dnr niffr'ttr
2 Lrbrarran
3 Lrbrary Assrstant
4 Library Aide
5
6
'l
I
9
10
11
1Z
IJ
14 Crculatrcn
5tr/c
15 Total Staff andSouareFeet Gasonnel) 9 10
Snecial Area,{EquiDmmt
16 Pub lic Counter w/Retum
1? Bookcase, 3 Shelves
18
19 RecEtron Arta, Seats 4
20
21 Photocopier, Medium, wtth Bast
22 Work Table, Access I Sldt
23
24 Conference Roorn, Seats 6
25 Conference Roorn, Seats 2C
LO
2? &l!S.:rsed-&e
28 SupportModule
29 Workroom
30 Storage F.oom
31 Coffee Staticn
32 Dinng Table, Seats 4
JJ
34 Technrcal Servrces Roorr
35 Work Table, Access 2 SideYl End
36 Open Systerns Wolkstatlon
3? Industnal Shelving, Open
JU TJOOK UAN
39 Intemal Circulatim
4rJ Total BreakRoom
4l
42 @-S!ar&a
43 Bookcase,3 Shelves
44 Bockcase, 6 Shelves
4J Movable Ftlt
46 Movable Frlr
47 Work Table, Access 1 Sld€
48 CcrnputerTabl€
49 Reading Table, Seats 6
50 Stu$ Roc,rnlCarrel
51 Conference Roorn, Seats 6
5?
53 Work Table, Access 1 Stde
54 Microfilm Storage Cabtnet, 20 Dmr
55
P€!'sormdlQuantiq Net Square Feet (NSF)
NSF
Code t@0t2030 m4 2r1fl mo1 2@O 2{130 Zo4E 2t150
p06
vr3
w3
niws
pcd2
fr CaJ
raZ
pcz
wtal
crZ
cr?
mlel
wr2
er
Kec I
ste I
wla6
wl
rsal
SC
b ca3
b ca6
mrbl
mibl
wtal
cta 1
stdl
c12
wtal
zz4
o4
64
60
10
108
4Z
z5
140
480
40
zz4
80
41
64
56
JO
9
zo
35Yo
10
10
OJ
JO
74
t1?
>J
140
25
1Z
1
2
3
)
2
z
2
2
?
z
4
3
102
151
15
15
18
6
1
z
z
I
1
1
J
3
I
4
3
1
A
5
't?
1
5
4
3
128
192
n?
192
304
256
192
.\JD
256
256
368
320
256
400
81 6 a1t 1.008 .104 I _300
56
5? Circulation
25Vo
1;745 2,1 85 2.65'7 i ?44
58 Total Square Fed (Spectal Area/Equlpm( a;t26 10.923 13.286 16.24-l 19.? 83
2
z
z
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
5
Jlo
21
21
zo
8
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
I
3
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
?
7.
4
3
180
z1-l
zo
LO
22
10
3
)
?
1
I
2
2
1
3
3
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
l
J4
)q
?4
12
/
J
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
J
454
43
43
zo
14
5
4
3
1
1
120
z0
108
84
50
140
480
40
80
4l
64
112
'72
JO
60
a
351
I,020
|,570
945
540
450
744
11'7
10
280
z5
17
120
zo
108
u
50
140
480
40
80
41
g
112
'72
JO
6l
T
1,406
z,1e
1,303
144
500
234
10
280
25
1Z
120
20
108
126
'75
140
480
40
80
4l
64
112
lz
JO
60
l'l
35'7
1,800
2,110
I,OOU
953
J50
240
351
105
280
25
12
120
z0
108
lzo
'75
140
480
40
80
41
{4
112
7Z
JO
60
T
5)t
? ?ar4
7 546
59 Total Staff and Square Feet 9 lo tl t2 l3 9.92 11.835 t4.D4 I ?.351 20.982
60 SDaee Incr€ase Over Cutent Area iJit;l 1.835 4-294 1 351 10.982
Poge 271 of 356
1,ZZO
600
288
468
105
4ZD
25
1Z
120
20
108
tzo
'75
140
480
1
)
40
80
41
g
12
12
JO
60
'1'l
5'7
? a4q
4 54n
I 17j
1,561
650
JJO
585
140
420
25
12.
8 FTE
RmilkJNotes
Children p lay.6r att area
fubilc use
Cornputer trarnrng
Shared - Trarrrng, s€mrnars
Fax, prrrler. mrsc. equpmed
Cop i,r, supp lies, stqage
Staffbreak area
B ool/d ocument processn g,
mailing area
2l', 2-sided
12', 2-sided
Study carrels
Microfiche re ad €!'/nrrnts
Currenl SF = 10.00(

PUBLIC DEFENDER
Employee Ctrassifrcation c
Spsial Ara/Equipmmt
Emplovee Classificatisr
1 Publrc Defender
2 Chref DEuty P-rblic Defenda
3 Attom€"
4 Chreflnvestigatc,r
5 Investrgatcr
6 P oly graph Examina,Trv esti gator
? Mitigation Specialist
I Psychologrst
9 Supa.,rrsing Legal Secretary
1 0 Legal Secretary
1 1 Support Staff
I Z rOclal WCrKef
13 Office Manager
1 4 Adminisirative Asslstant
1 5 Training Speciahst
to
11
Pusmd/Qmtity Net Squde Fet (NSF)
NSF
Codt 2DU7 mml?JJ'3dlm4 2tl5t 2m7 2om 2(B0 m0 2WO
Po6
p04
po3
po3
Poz
poz
poz
Poz
po2
w2
wZ
Po2
poz
poz
Po2
224
tod
14C
14C
1ZC
12C
7ZC
1ZC
1ZC
4€
4E
1ZC
lZC
7ZC
12C
1
6
LO
1
6
I
i
1
10
5
1
1
9
41
I
ll 1
1
1
15
6
1t
1
1
1
1
10
1
1Z
1
1
1
to 'l
12
1
1
1
1
12
IJ
1
1
1
1
2
l9 B
IJ
1
1
1
1
IJ
59
z
14
2
7
1
2
21
9
15
z
Z
z
a1n
1,008
3,640
140
'120
1B
I I U lrtulauc,n
35010
t -1lo ^ 194 4.]49 5.312 6.1 00
20 Total Staff and Squarc Feet @ersonnel) 59 i0l t4 lZfl t47 g l5s 16, 178 18.311 20.488 31.528
SlelicLArs4lEcsipues!
21 Receptron Area, Seats 14
22
23 Conferance Roc'rn, Seats 2C
24 Conferance Roc,rn, Seats 12
25 Wc,rkroom
26 Mail Sortrng Statron
2]
28 E!!e-@
29 Industrial Shelving, Op€n
30 Industrral Shelvng, Operr
31 WcrkTable, Access 1 Srd.Jl End
32 Stcrage Cabinel, 2 Door
33 Photocopier, Medium, wtth Base
34 Intemal Circulatron
35 Total File Room
Jb
3? Investrgativ e Supp ly/Stc,rage Roon
38 Stcrage Roorn
40 Photocopier, Medium, wrth Base
41 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Drawa
42 Coffee Statron
43
44@
45 Krtchenette
46 VandrngMachrne
47 Dining Table, Seats4
48 Inbernal Circulatron
49 Total Break P.oorn
50
ll
ra5
cr?
crd
wr2
mssl
isa 1
rsb2
wtaZ
sca2
nnJ
r'-
er
pcz
fl04
kecl
kedl
ked2
ste2
304
48C
28C
?24
z4
IJ
J'
14
42
3A/a
loL
8C
41
11
15
15
30/a
I
I
I
I
2
fC'
5
1
1
1
I
z
2
j
1
1
?
z
120
120
r20
480
240
tzo
1
5
I
1
224
512
'744
140
320
120
1ZA
120
'724
288
330
120
120
120
1,680
6,5 80
140
1,440
120
120
'120
?40
IDE
JJO
1,440
120
1ZO
120
224
2,016
1,420
i40
1,560
120
120
120
240
912
384
1,560
lZO
120
120
2,1U
8,260
280
1,680
240
240
120
240
1,008
5Z
53
54
55
56
57 Circulalion
250/.
JIJ 944 1,008 1,066
58 Total Souare Feei (SpecralArearEqurpment) ? ?al 4.06€, 4;7ZO 5.039 J-rt I
I
1
1
1
2
65
6
1
1
1
I
z
2
4
I
1
2
J
I
1
2
2
74
1
1
i
1
I
)
5
z
1
z
1
1
z
3
84
I 1
1
1
1
3
3
5
?
1
z
1
1
1
z
3
93
9
1
1
1
1
3
3
6
2
1
2
5
304
480
280
48
504
65
38
14
199
863
160
160
u
56
4l
11
JU
150
'7'7
304
480
280
224
48
'78
38
14
42
227
984
160
lou
84
lc'
4l
1l
225
100
432
301
480
280
448
48
ODD
91
38
l4
42
?55
1,1 06
160
240
LLD
10
82
l1
30
22'5
100
304
480
280
448
1?
756
104
38
14
42
za6
1,240
59 Total Staff and Square Fe6: 59 101 114 128 L41 13.1.l9 zo,u4 23.037 t<

RENO JUSTICE COURT - ADMINISTRATION
Employee Classif catimr o
Sp edal ArsalEquipm€ort
Emp love e Class if icatisr
1 Administratim Divisiqr
2 Court Adrrunistratcr
3 Superr.rrsrng Clerk
4 Court Analyst
5 Admini strativ e Secretary
6 Assrstant Court Admnisbator
? Case lvfanager
e HR Analyst
9 IT Manag€r/Ana\tst
10 SiaffAttc,rney
11 lublic Informatrcn Offrcer
12 Law Cleri<
1 3 Interpreler Coordrnabc,r
14 Intapretator
15 AccountingDivisitrr
1 6 Accountrng Supervrsot
1? Corut Cleft
Spac(
Codc NSF
pol
p05
p02
w3
p06
p02
p02
p02
p03
poz
w4
p02
wZ
w3
w2
280
196
120
48
zz4
lZC
12C
t2c
14C
rzc
8C
12C
4E
64
4E
PcsrmeUQuantity Net Square Feet (NSF)
tffi ma m3t 2t]l{ 2tlst n7 mm 2(m ryo ut50
2
1
1
1
1
z
1
3
I
I
1
I
1
2
1
z 'I
I
z
1
J
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
I
I
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
z
i
j
280
196
120
48
48
280
lvb
120
48
240
120
120
140
120
120
144
280
196
120
48
224
240
120
2l0
140
120
120
144
280
lvb
120
4A
224
360
120
240
140
1ZO
120
192
280
196
120
48
224
360
120
240
140
t20
120
192
Ranmrks/Not€6
Locate in srclosed office
Locate in Accounting Office
Locate in Accountng Office
18
19 Circulaticn
5Ctp/"
346 gz4 996 1.080 1.080
20 Total Statt and Sauare Feet (Pe!'sc,nnel)
Snecial Area/Equbment
1 1[j zo 22 z2 1.038 2.4'tz 2.988 3.240 3.240
21 RecEtron Area, Seats 2
OJ
1
OJ DJ bJ OJ OJ
22 Conferance Room, Seats 20+
4ZC
1
420 4ZO 474 4ZO 4ZO Strne as f,(lstlrlg
23 Sto'rage
er 14C I
140 140 140 i40 140 Secure s:pphes
24 Court REolter Offrce
35
er 12C
1
120 120 120 1ZA 120 2 contract rtporters
la, WCtrKAfea
r
28 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Drawer
oa
miel
flc4
4C
t4
1
J
1
3
I
3
1
3
I
j
40
42
40
42
40 40
4?
40
AA
29
30 -supp*tlrodul.
Accountrns Office
31 Super'rrscrWorkstatro,n
32 Court Clsk ltrtrorkstation
JJ t loor ilare
er
vr3
vr2
25f,
64
4E
'l€
I
I
1
1
250 250 250 250 250
34 Workarea
))
35 fue@
3'7 Krtchenette
38 Refngerator
39 Verrdrrg lvladrine
4ft Work Counter, Access I Srde
41 Drnrng Table, Seats 4
4Z Char
43 Sofa, Seats 3
oa
er
ked i
keal
ked2
wca€
ste3
csal
cscl
5C
'7'J
11
I]
34
64
12
JC
I
I
I
I
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
1
I
1
1
I
1
4
z
1
1
1
1
1
A
2
'I
1
'I
1
1
8
5
2
'1'7
1'7
ll
34
192
24
JO
'7'l
1'7
ll
34
320
JO
JO
'7'l
1l
1l
34
448
48
12
'7j
1'7
15
448
48
J?
1'l
7J
15
34
512
60
'72
r4l6 NSF Cunent
AA Enn!.nccp 5 Rhplup.
45 QuretArea
46 InternalCrrculatron
4l Total Breakroom
48
49
bcb5 13
8C
35Vl
1 1
Z
1
z
2 2 IJ
'143
551
IJ
160
?4P.
956
lf
160
309
1 10?
/o
240
347
1 ?14
26
240
369
1.422
Pa'tially anclosed, corrputa
50 Small Clarns Mediation Suite
51 Waiting / Wort Area
52 ConferanceRoorq Seats 8
53 CcrrferenceRoorq Seats 12
54 htanal Crrculatrcn
55 Total Mediatic'rr Suite
er
er
cr4
cr6
10c
192
z8(
ZCf/c
1
1
.I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
100
192
280
ZE
t91
100
192
zao
306
878
100
192
280
100
192
280
??R
950
100
192
280
399
9't1
lontract medratons
56
) / L lrcutallon
25%
606 '7n 798 836 db/
58 Total Souare Feet (Sr,ecial Area/Eouioment) 3.028 J.bJ] 3.991 4.180 4.334
J9 Total Stalf and Square Feet: 7 IE m )J ta 4,66 6.10? 6,98 1.4n ?.574
60 Space Increase OverCurrentArea 4-066 6.1 0? 6.n9 't.420 '7-5"74
Poge 273 of 356
Current SF:

RENO JUSTICE COURT - BAITIFF
Enrploye Clasifrcation m
Spwial Area./Equipmat
Employee Classif icatiut
I Bailiff Supcviscr
Z Barhff
3
4
5
6
1
8
I
10
11
1Z
IJ
l4
tl
lo
1l
lo
19 Ctrculattorr
PammeUQuantity Nd Squde Fet (NSF)
NSF
Codr mo? Iann 2Il3O 2fi4IJ 2I)fl 2m7 xno mfi 2f}$ 2t}50
ntws
loa
5CP/
:0 Total Staf t and SquareFeet G€rscnnel) I l4 15 l7 752 252 252 257
Soecial Area/Equbment
21@!s
ZZ ll.rblic Counter Queurng Area
23 Tandern Seat
24 Wori< Counter, Access 1 Stde
25
26 Work Area
Z'l Public CounlerPosthon
28 Photoccpren, Medturn, wtth Base
29 Suppcrt Module
30 Frle Cabinet, Laberal 4 Drawet
31 Storage Cabrnet, 2 Door
'L
3 3 Briefins Rcorn
34 Movable Table, Seats 2
35 l.r/ork Ccurta', Access 1 Slde
36 Storage Cabnet, 2Door
3J Podrum
38
3e@
40 Kltchen€it€
41 Refngaator
42 Vendrng l"{adune
43 Drning Table, Seats 4
44 Internal Circulaircn
45 Total Breakroom
46
47@
48 Locker w/pull out bencL
49 Entrance i Soundlock
50 Int€rnal Clrculahcfl
51 Total Locker Roorr
5Z
53 ShowerRoom. Mm
54 Shower/ Dryng Unrt
55 l:nternal Circulatrcn
56 Total Sho\ r€!'Roorn, Mm
5'7
58Shss.s3eem-@
59 Showerl Dry:ng Untt
60 Internal Circulahon
61 Total ShovrerRoorn. Worn€n
oa
oa
csel
wca5
se
pcz
miel
fl04
scaZ
tr
5e
vrcal
sca2
€t'
kedl
keal
ked2
fl
er
ff
SE
4C
24
42
4C
14
l4
25
I4
'7i
1i
l:
&
350,1
4
2CPt
1t
ZCP/'
1i
2V/'
1
l
5
10
)
5
I
I
z
z
4
z
i
1
1
1
1
z
I
z
z
1
l0
5
l0
3
5
1
1
7
3
5
z
1
1
1
i
1
2
12
?
z
IJ
I
6
1Z
3
6
1
I
2
2
6
7
i
i
I
1
1
z
14
2
2
I
'I
t4
6
TZ
1
6
1
1
2
2
1
z
I
1
I
I
1
z
to
2
3
2
1
lo
I4 j
1
.?
1
1
z
z
'l
z
I
I
i
1
1
?
l8
z
Poge 27A of 356
3
z
168
u
200
1D
'72
150
42
40
ze
L6
100
14
18
i'?
17
ll
128
dJ .-
&
96
16
Jb
Z
43
18
!
72
168
a4
200
70
lz
150
47
40
28
Zg
175
ze
14
18
't"t
1'l
15
128
83
96
vo
38
230
35
7
43
18
!
ZZ
168
u
240
u
'72
180
,1
40
28
28
150
ZB
14
18
't'7
1'7
l)
12e
dJ .-
112
96
42
250
JO
a
43
18
!
22
168
u
240
u
96
180
42
4D
28
?8
115
28
14
18
'7'7
11
15
128
83
3ZO
128
96
45.
269
11
65
JO
Z
168
u
280
98
95
TA
42
40
z8
28
1'15
2a
l4
l8
'77
11
ll
B3
)LU
1M
96
48
288
11
bl
JO
7
Rmks/Nots
\dja c€nt to eourt:oorns
)rWxB'D per court€r postror
A,lso use courtroom wartrng
lublic use
i'Wx6'D
iax, pnnter, slppltes
f o be ccnfirmed
Sffice supphes - bo be cc,nfirrned
5'Wx 2'D
Divide for mar and women
Full-herght lockers Z'\LIx2'l

RENO JUSTICE COURT - BAILIFF
Special Ara/Equipmert
62 Restrooms, Mm and Wornerr
OJ
K4 Dlrrrci.el I'itne

RENO JUSTICE COURT - COURT OPERATIONS
Employ€e Classificatim or
Spcial Ara/Equipmat
1 CriminalDivisimr
2 Supovisor
3 Cowl Clerk
4 Deputy Cledc
I KeCC|ltS Ul€t'l{
6
? CitaticrsDivisim
8 Supavrsor
9 Accountrng Clak
10 Court Clerk
1 1 Tf 6r 'h' alord'
12
13 CivilDivbion
14 Rrrnmricm
15 Court Cleft
16 Depuiy Clerk
17 Records Clsk
18
19
20 Crculatro'rr
2l I otal statt and square.beet {Personnell
Soe cia I A realEquiDment
22 Public Cormter
li lalDllc LOunter SIaUCn
24 Queurrg Area
z7
26 Stalkrng / Harassmmt Statlon
2? Work Cotrnter, Access 1 Side
28
29 CriminalDivisiur
30 File Cabrnet, Vertrcal 5 Drw Legal
Jl uaro-Flle uaDner
32 Frle Cabrnet, Open Shelf
3l File Cabrnet, Swivel Mcdel
34
35 SupportModule
36 Phoiocc,pia, Meditnn, with Base
37 Worli Counter, Access I Srde
38 Stcrage Cabinet, Docket Books
39 Bookcase,6 Shelves
40
41 CitatimsDivisi(r
42 Frle Cabrnd., Vertrcal 3 Dw,r Legal
43 File Cabrnet, Open Shelf
44 File Cabrnd., Lateral 4 Drawer
45 Phobocc'pier, Mediurn, with Base
46 SupporLModule
47 Work Counte, Aceess I Slde
48 Frle Cabrnet, Open Shelf
49
50 Civil Divbion
51 File Cabrnet, Open Shelf
52 Frle Cabrnd, Vertical 4 Drrr Legal
53 File Cabrnd, Lat€ral 5 Drawer
54 Woft Count€r, Access 1 Srde
55 Photocc,pier, Medium, with Base
56 SupportModule
Sparl Persilmd/qrantity Nd Square F€et (NSF)
NSF
Codt t001 mm z(B0 MI 2{1$ 2m7 2tnB mn 2n4IJ 2050
p02
w2
wz
poz
w2
w7
w2
p02
w2
wz
wZ
SC
oa
€f
wca5
IVD]
SE
SE
5e
mel
t-_
wca5
SE
DCab
fvb3
flo1
pc2
rmel
wca5
5e
'I /t
4t
4t
4E
1 2t
4€
4t
4t
12(
4t
4t
4t
5001
30
40
100
24
9
8
18
41
40
42
24
50
10
9
14
l4
42
40
24
1Z
8
5
1
1
i
1
3
1
1
5
1
l0
6
2
1
?
Z
4
1
1
1
3
I
12
'7
2
1
3
z
5
1
1
I
j
li
'I
8
z
1
3
3
6
I
I
9
-7
1
tl
10
3
I
3
3
I
1
1
l0
6
3&+
240
48
120
48
48
144
124
48
240
96
1'7 6
480
288
96
1ZD
96
96
192
120
48
t)o
144
l?6
5'76
fJo
96
1ZO
144
96
240
120
48
3U
792
1?6
624
384
96
120
144
144
288
120
48
'768 1.096 1.764 1.408 1.624
ja 40 4'l ('l l.ttll 3.138 i. t92 4.t i4 4.',8 t:
15
lf
1
2
to
3
to
z
1
1
z
1
5
8
12
2
I
1
2
2
10 LO LO LO LA LO 2.60 LOV zffi 260 lou
fvb4 9 22 z? z2 22 zz 198 198 198 198 198
Il0l
wca5
1Z
z4
4
5
A
J
n 4
3
4
3
48
72
48
]Z
48
'72
48
'72
48
lz
pc7 42 1 1 1 I 1 47 4Z 47
42
nnel 40 1 1 1 I 1 40 40 40 40 40
58 Crculation
oa 80
25%
1 1 1 1 I 80
-782
80
-t82
80
823
80
858
80
858
59 Tolal Souare Feet(Specrel ) 3.910 3.910 4.115 4.290 4.290
6O Total Stalf and S quare Feet 29 I 41 53 62 6.2t4 ?.198 7.q1 8,514 9,162
61 Soace Increase O,/tr Curr€ntArea
t:)
tl
1
7
lo
J
to
2
1
1
z
1
5
I
12
2
1
1
z
?
17
1'l
1
3
ID
3
lo
z
1
I
z
1
5
8
1Z
2
1
1
2
2
19
19
I
3
16
j
lb
2
1
I
2
i
5
8
12
z
I
1
2
z
19
19
i
3
to
J
16
I
1
z
1
5
I
12
2
1
1
7
2
Poge 276 of 356
Z
450
600
100
48
744
24
288
8Z
40
4B
50
50
t2
168
2e
42
40
48
24
450
600
100
48
144
24
288
82
40
4Z
48
50
50
lz
168
28
40
48
24
510
680
100
1?
144
24
288
82
210
42
4B
50
50
1Z
168
28
4?
40
48
24
240
5?0
?60
100
17
144
z4
28e
az
40
42
48
50
50
1Z
168
28
40
48
24
1"76
'7ZO
480
120
144
1nA
34
120
48
480
288
5?0
160
100
'tz
144
24
2e8
8?
40
42
48
50
50
'7?
168
28
42
40
/t8
24
al A
6 7 198 '7 q)'l 8-5 14 9.162
Ranilks/Not6
Shared by all div isrons
5'w x 8'd ptr count€r
posrtrcrr
Enclosed
Public use
l 5"w x 28'd
3'w x 2'-3" d double sided
Crrninal warrants
7'-6'w x 2'-6"d
Fa:

RENO JUSTICE COURT. JUDICIARY
Employee Cla sifrcation tr
Special ArB/Equipmat
Emplovee C lassif icatiur
1 Juslice ofthePeace
2 Judge's Secretary (1 per 2-3.1udges)
3
4
5
6
'7
8
I
10
1l
17
ti
l4
l5
lo
11
18
19 Circulation
20 Total Staff and Souare Feet @ersurnel)
4Ut
l 10
Sp ecial ArealE quiD me[rt
21 Courtroom, Specnl
22 Couftroom, Standard
?? flnrr*rnnm T orae
24 Vestlbule Enby
25 Jury Suite (w/resboc,rn)
26 Atomqr/Client C cnfersrct
2? V ict:rn.Mlrtness Waihng
28 FubLc Waiting
29 PubLc Waitrng
30
31 Judicral Chambers
32 Judge's Office (1 each)
33 .fudge's Res!:oom (1 each)
34 Judicial Secretary Area
3 5 CopyAAlork/Frle Area
36 l:ternal Crrculation
31 Tolal Judicial Chambers
38
Jv uounroomlloldln!
40 Holding Cell (2 each)
41 OfficerArea (1 each)
42 Atborney/ClientConf*€nce(l eadrl
43 Seorre Vestrbule (2 each)
44 Internal Circulatton
45
46
4'1 tudge's Offrce
48 -tudge's Clerk
49 CopyAlrork/FrleArea
50 l:ternalCirculation
51 Total Surte
5Z
)5
54
55
56
pacl PssotmeVQumtit)r Net Squre Fed (NSF)
NSF
Codr 2mo 2tl3t zt]/.f z05t 2It07 202g nn ztJ4,o 20sl
57 Circulaticrr
ZU/a
'4 29t:,
58 Total Square Feet (Specral ArealEqulpmenl) t9 .77
po
oa
€r
€('
€n
€r
€r
oa
oa
€tr
ef
er
oa
oa
tr
€r
oa
p06
!r3
oa
32(
19.
1,500
l,800
2,400
80
215
120
120
200
300
3ZA
80
196
60
ZU/o
BO
ll
30
5U/o
224
64
14t
ZU/o
5
2
/
1
5
I
5
5
5
5
5
z
2
3
6
3
o
6
5
I
6
1
6
6
6
6
6
3
3
3
6
3
3
6
z
1
1
j
3
6
I
'l
I
1
7
'7
'7
'7
3
3
4
B
4
4
8
2
1
1
9
A
8
I
I
9
9
9
9
9
4
4
5
10
5
5
10
z
1
1
10
5
9
1
10
1
10
10
l0
10
10
5
5
5
10
5
5
t0
2
1
I
6,000
2,400
400
215
600
@0
1,500
1,600
400
120
502
3,014
1.?36
?24
64
140
86
514
?,5 00
2,404
480
215
'7ZO
720
1,800
1,920
480
588
180
bJ4
3,6t
I,ZJO
448
&
140
130
t6L
9,000
2,400
560
215
uo
840
2,1 00
2 ?Afi
560
588
180
'714
4,282
1/49,
448
64
140
130
'782
1 2,000
2,400
lZO
215
1,080
1,080
2,100
2,880
7?O
'78r'
240
925
5 54S
3.931 4 5it 5.111 6.299
586 n.zoo 34.303 3'7;792
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 1 9 10 13 15 19.n5 23.586 21.nO 34.36 31.82
60 SDace Increase Over Current Area 19.?7 5 586 2:7.200 34.303 3'7 _192
Poge 277 of 356
'
2.060
448
&
.140
130
13,500
2,400
800
215
1,200
1,200
3,000
3,200
800
980
300
1.056
2,060
448
ty+
.140
130
'782
RmrkJNstes
-oc inJudicral Chambas
-oc rn Judrcral Chambers
oflJury tnal
iviVenminal, jury trial
erernonral, high profile
1ury trial
lncludes closet
Includes reception area
I pm 2 courtrocrns
Desk w/counter
Secure
Access to courtf,oom
Currrnt SF =

RENO JUSTICE COURT - EXISTING - JUDICIARY
Employee Classificatiur or
Sptrial Area/Equipmmt
Emp lovee Classif ication
1 Justrce ofthe Peace
2 Judge's Secretary (1 per 2-3 judges)
3
4
5
6
] 8
I
10
t1
12
14
15
lo
11
34 Judicial Secretary Area
35 Copy/Wcrk/File Area
36 Intemal Crculatron
J / r olal Juolclal unatTtD€rs
38
3e .S:Sqe-sls-Esldse
40 Holding Cell (2 each)
41 OfficerArra (1 each)
42 Attcrney/Client Conference(l each)
43 Secure Vestibule (2 eadr)
44 Intemal Crculatior
45
46 Senior/Protsn Judges Suite
47 Judge's Office
48 Judge's Clerk
49 Copy/Worlc/FileArea
50 Intemal Circulation
51 Tctal Surte
52
54
PasmneUQmntity Nd Square Fe€t (NSF)
NSF
Code 2mi 2@t 2(l3Ot2tltt ?Q5( 2m7 2@O 20cl 20/,O 2050
Fo
oa
oa
er
oa
ef
p06
w3
oa
321
19r
18
19 Circulation
20 Total Staff and Souare Feet (Personnel)
SDecial ArealEouipment
4oo/,
] 9
?1 Courtroorn, Exl$.mg
er 1,5't: 5 5
22 Courtroom, New
er 1,50(
23 Courtroom, Largr
er ? tn(
1
24 Vestrbule Entry
er 8( 5 6
25 Jury Suite (w/restroom)
er 43( 1 1
26 Attcrney/Chent Conference, Exrshnp
10( 5 6
27 Vrctrm/Wrbress Wartrng, New
er 12(
28 trrblic Wartng
oa 20(
29 Public Wariing
oa
5 6
30
314&ial!@
er
\r
wgr/
33 Judge's Restroom (1 eactr)
er
er
30(
6(
5
5
6
6
oa 19( z 3
6(
z00t
41i
8(
t:
3(.
5:
5001
22,
o<
14(
20at
5
2
2
3
6
3
3
6
I
1
1
6
3
7
t
.10
9
j
l0 5
IJ 15
55
Itl
57 Circulation
30or
4.1 01 5,534 6_21 0 '7.652 8,419
58 Toial Square Feet (Specral Area/EqulDm€nt) n;t'72 23.981 26.909 i3.1 60 36.482
3
3
6
3
3
6
7
1
1
5
1
1
'l
1
6
2
l
1
l 5
)
j
I
A
4
I
2
1
1
5
1
I
1
b
6
9
9
9
n
4
5
l0
5
5
10
z
1
1
5
4
1
l0 1
6
I
10
10
10
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
z
I
I
1,865
400
430
500
2,600
1,500
300
392
120
462
2,1"t4
1,1 88
&
140
86
514
'7,865
2,400
480
430
600
2,600
1,800
360
5BB
180
586
? 514
2,316
448
&
140
130
toL
? Rd5
1,500
2,400
560
430
600
240
2,600
2,1 00
420
588
180
658
i q46
2,3'76
445
b4
140
130
182
'7,865
4,5 00
2,400
't20
430
600
7ZO
3,500
2,'700
540
'tu
240
OJJ
5,ilt
59 Total Staff and Square Feets 1 9 10 13 l5 L?.172 23.9E1 26.909 33.10 36.€2
60 Soace Increase Over Current Aree t't-1'12 23.981 26.909 13.1 60 3 6.4S2
Poge 278 of 356
?,3'14
448
4
140
130
782
7,865
6,000
2,400
800
430
600
960
3,800
3,000
600
980
300
n6
5,85 6
2,370
448
64
140
130
182
R€lmrkYNotes
Loc in Judicial Chambers
Loc rn Judicral Chambens
Non-1ury inal
Ccernonial, hrgh profile
.1ury lrial
Includes closet
Includes recephon area
1 per 2 courtrccrns
Desk w/counter
Secure
Access to courtroom
Currrnt SF:

2NO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - COURT ADMINISTRATOR / CTERK OF THE COURT:
ADMINISTRATION
Employe Classification or
Spcial Area/Equipmmt
Emp loyee Class if ication
1 Court Adm:nistrator/Clerk of the C outt
2 Adminisirative Assistanl
3 Admimstrative Secretary
4 Human Resources Analyst
5 Frscal Analyst
6 Data Analy*
.J
I
9
10
II
1?
l_a
l4
15
t6
1?
18
19 Crrorlatron
Spacl
Codr NSF
po'l
p04
p04
poz
po2
280
tob
196
168
120
12t
540,1
PssornevQuandty Net Squde Fe€t (NS F)
2007 NzT zo4{ mfl 2tn7 mm 2u30 m4 2050
1
1
1
20 Total Staff and SouareFeet Perscrrnelr 6 6 6 966 966 578 1.57 8 114
Special AreaiIquipment
21 l$g]#a
72 Frle Cabrnet, Lataal 4 Drawer
23 Frle Cabrnet, Lataal 5 Drawer
24 File Cabrnet, Lateral 3 Drawer
25 File Cabinet, Lateral 5 Drawer
26 Suppo'rt }"{odule
n
28 Wcdaoorn
29 Conference Room, Seats 2C
JU LOIIEE SIAT1ON
fl
JJ
34
JO
38
39
40
41
47
43
44
45
46
4]
48
49
50
5l
52
54
55
56
) / urrclrllltron
58 Total Square Feet (Soecral Area/Equrpmenl)
oa
flc4
flc5
lta5
Itcl
mrel
w11
t]
kecl
14
t4
10
t4
40
lod
480
4t
25o/c
z
I
z
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Z
1
Z
I
I
2
1
?
2
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
z
I
z
z
1
I
1
280
168
196
3?2
28
14
20
14
4D
480
4I
280
168
196
322
28
14
20
l4
40
480
41
280
lod
tvb
168
120
120
526
280
168
Ivb
168
1?0
120
j16
280
ts
196
168
120
120
526
159 159 loJ loJ
't9€, 196 196 814 814
59 Total StaIT and Souare Feet: J 3 6 6 6 r,162 1,162 2.314 ?,392 2,392
60 Soace Increase Over Currmt Area 1.? 62 I.IOL 2.374 2.39? ?.392
Poge 279 of 356
28
14
z0
t4
40
480
4l
28
14
20
L6
40
480
41
28
74
zo
z8
40
480
4l
RmilkdNot6
ncludes receptrc,n area
lersonnel frles
iax, pnnta
?hotocopy, supplies-shared
Currmt SF:

2tro JUDICIAI DISTRICT COURT - COURT ADMINISTRATOR / CTERK OF THE COURT: COURT
TECHNOTOGY
Employ€e Classifrati@r or
Sp ecial Ar€a/ Equip memt
Emp loyee Classification
I Manager
2 Sy stems Administrator
3 Nebrcnk Engrneer
4 Busness Systtrns Analysl
5 Suppcrt Specrahst
6 Administrative Assrstant
? Rrr

2HO JUDICIAT DISTRICT COURT - COURT ADMINISTRATOR / CLERK OF THE COURT: FILING
OFFICE
Emplry e Classifrcatior or
Sp ecial Area,/E quip mort
Emp loyee Classification
I Super'/rsor
2 Depuf Clerk
3 Accountrn g T echnrcran
4 Administrative Clerk - Phone:
5 Records Clak (Courier)
6 Depury Clert: - Evrdence
? Deputy Clerk - Appeals
8 Depug Clerk - lmagrng
9 Manager
l0 Supervrsor
l1 Deputy Clerk - Marl Desk
l2 Depug Clerk - Cash Desk
IJ
I4
l5
lo
ipacl
Codr NSF
w1
wZ
poz
!q2
WL
wZ
w3
wZ
pd
p03
w2
wZ
48
48
zo
48
48
48
64
48
OU
2A
48
48
PrsmneVQmntiq N€t Square Fet (NSF)
2tIJ1 2020 2(Br z|J/,O 2tlst 2m7 2WO 2030 2ty,D 2[fl]
I
l4
i
I
2
1
I
z
3
1
1
t'7
l8
l9 Circulation
51Vo
t92 1.104 I. 128 1.224 1.308
20 Total Staff and Square Feet (Personnel)
Special Area/Equipment
z8 38 39 44 3 6'72 3 924
21 Il.rblic Counter
22
74
25
LO
n
28
29
30
tt
fJ
34
JO
5l
38
39
40
41
47
43
44
45
46
48
49
50
51
52
))
54
55
56
5'7
58
59
60
ol
Fub h c C or.nter Wonk statr c!-I
Quzuing Area
Bad

2HO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - COURT ADMINISTRATOR / CLERK OF THE COURT: FILING
OFFICE
PmomeUQuantity Nd Sqmre Fet (NSF)
Sp ecial Area/E quipment NSF.
CodE l02t 2tB0 ztJ4,n 205t 2m? mm 2030 zt)4,n 2050
62 Scannnq Area
63 Scannrng Statron
& ArchrveWnta
65
66 Supply Storage Roorn
ol
68 Aopeals office
bv ulertas worKsr.alon
1O File Cabinet, Open Shelf
11 Intemal Crrculahon
72 Total Appeals Office
t7
74 Br@
15 Krtchenette
14 D ofiiaaofnr
'7'7 Vanding Machine
78 Dnrng Table, Seats 4
19 lnrcmal ufculauon
80 Total Breakroc,rn
81
82 ConferenceRoorn, Seats l2
83 Workroom
84 Evtdence Stcrrage Roorn
85
86 Vault
s7
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
0l
02
03
04
05
06
0l
08
09
10
ll
1Z
IJ
14
15
16
11
18
.19
oa
er
er
w3
SE
er
kedl
kea I
Keol
ste3
cr6
wrZ
er
er
64
18
48
64
1Z
30%
'7'l
11
ll
64
35%
280
224
1, 200
60
5
i
I
1
3
1
1
?
I
I
'I
I
20
zl
zz
23 Circulatic'n
ZsVo
1.141 I .812 1.8+5 1 414
24 Tolal Square Feet (Specral Area/Equtpmflt) 8,701 9 05C 9,510 9,609
5
1
?
J
I
I
2
A
5
1
2
J
1
1
7
5
I
5
t
I
)
1
1
z
5
I
I
I
I
5
)
)
1
1
2
5
320
18
48
&
JO
30
130
't1
11
'192
!u
4n
280
1,200
60
320
18
48
128
JO
49
LLJ
'17
lj
30
256
IJJ
513
280
224
I,200
60
320
18
48
128
JO
49
213
't]
1]
30
370
155
599
280
2?4
1,200
6D
320
18
48
192
JO
68
296
l'l
1J
30
320
ll:
599
280
?24
1,200
25 Total Stalt and Square Feet 28 38 39 44 46 11,OE0 12,311 L2,81 t3,242 13.533
126 Snace Incrcase Ovtr Current Area I 1,080 13.371 1 2.60? 17 JAJ l3 5i3
60
3ZO
18
48
192
JO
68
296
'77
1l
30
3ZO
155
599
280
224
I,ZOO
60
RmnrkdNotes
8' x8', 3 gareral, 2 fami$
2'w x 3'd
n ffi.a c,nhlioc
'w x l'd, single sided,
sealed criminal case filer
To be confirrned-can be
located rn basernmt
Currently shared w/Clerft
Note.
lff% of requirements to
Gmenal Junsdiction and
30/o Fami$ Court if they
are located rr separate
burldrngs.
Current SF =

2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - FAMITY COURT DIVISION: COURT OPERATIONS
Emplcg e Classilication or
Spcial AreatEquipmmt
EmD lovee Classif ication
1 Asst. District Court Admrnistrator
2 Court Op€rah(r'ns Supervlsor
3 Depub/ Cled{
4 Court Clerk, Judicial
5 Court Clerk, Divrsicrn
6
1
I
9
10
11
17.
l)
14
ll
lo
11
Space PgsorneUQmtiry Net Squue Feet (NSF)
NSF
Code m0: MA 2{)3r fl40 mfl 2m7 ?nm 2tBo mln 2050
po6
p04
wZ
wZ
wZ
lou
48
48
48
1
1
?
I
10
18
lv L lrflllallon
5OVo
o /o '7't2 '796 94.0 1.228
20 Total Staff and Souare Feet CPersonnel) 2Z /o z'7 33 45 z,oz8 2,3l6 z.9:0 3,6P4
Snecial Area,{EauiDment
21 PublicCounter
22 Public Counter Station
23 Queuing Area
24 Work Counta', Access I Side
25
26 kk_fpunterWoftAreC
n Photocopieq Medium, with Base
Ze Support Module
29 Wort Counter, Access I Srdr
30 Storage Cab:net, 2 Door
JI
2" Tnrmra+arc Affrna
J-l
34 Educatron Liaison
3J
36 Dependancy Mediator
38 Conference Room, Seats 12
39
40 3r9ab9!a
41 Kltchmette
4l F p Fr.i oprat m
43 Vending Machine
44 Drnng Table, Seats 4
45 Internal Crculatic,n
46 Total Brealcroom
4'l
48 Stc,rage Roorn
49 Wcrkrocm
50 Reception Area, Seats 2
51 ConfsenceRoom, Seats 2C
52
)5
54
oa
se
oa
wcaT
oa
f-'
mie2
wcaJ
scaZ
poz
poz
poz
cr6
er
kedl
keal
ked2
str3
er
wrZ
ral
,r7
30
30
42
&
14
tz0
120
120
280
11
11
I]
6
3 )70
80
1A^
OJ
480
6
6
z
I
?
z
1
I
I
I
,l
1
1
3
I
'I
I
I
1
1
2
LL
10
I
1
J
tz
l0
I
I
3
16
12
1
1
3
24
lo
nni
168
96
384
480
11i
168
96
516
480
168
144
5'76
480
724
168
144
768
516
168
144
1,15?
'768
55
f6
I / UlroEf,lon
,50/^
650 /o I 831
952
58 Toml Souare Feet (Soecral ArealEquroment) ? )La 3.80? 4.151 4 ?5R 4;758
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 22 26 21 JJ 45 < t11 6.123 6,545 ?.5?8 4.442
60 Space Increase Over Curralt Area 5.?7i o- ll_1 6.545 1.518 8.442
o
6
7
1
z
2
2
z
t
1
1
I
o
6
3
2
I
2
z
z
z
z
z
I
I
1
1
8
8
z
1
z
2
)
J
2
I
1
I
5
I
1
1
1
I
I
2
1
Z
2
2
J
J
2
1
I
Poge 283 of 356
1
5
180
180
102
84
g
68
z8
120
lZO
lZO
280
'71
1?
tf
192
105
406
80
zz4
OJ
480
180
180
102
84
64
68
z8
240
240
240
280
7'7
1l
ll
256
128
493
80
224
OJ
480
180
180
102
B+
& 68
28
240
2t;0
240
560
7'7
11
ll
256
128
493
80
zz4
DJ
480
240
240
lJo
84
64
68
240
JbU
360
560
't1
1'7
ll
320
150
)/v
80
OJ
480
240
240
I JO
u
G
68
28
RmakJNots
fubhc counter, Cust Svcs
Z p a ludge
5'w x 3'-6id
5'w x 6'd, per counter posihc
Pubhc use
Faw nrini* ernnlia<
Office supphes
240 t intamrataCc
office
aanh
360 Grant funded positrc'n
360
560
't7
1'7
lf
3ZO
l-a
5'79
80
224
OJ
4SJ
Social services funded posfr
Audicy'video tapes
Ad1 to Courl Administrator
Current SF =

2no JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY COURT DIVISION: COURT PROGRAMS
Employee gla ssili catimr or
Special Are/Equipm6rt
Employee Classlficatim
1 Self-Help Center
2 Drector
3 AdminrsttztiveSecrelary
4
5 CASA
6 Director
7 Case Managa
u I ralner
9 Admrnislratle Secretary
10
11 FamilyMediation
12 Drectcr
13 Sanior Family Mediatot
14 AdminrstmtleSecretary
15 Adminlstt'atlve Secretary
16
11
PasomeUQuntity Nd Square Fed (NSF)
NSF
Codr rm1 2mO 2tBt 2@,O 2tlst ?,J,OJ 2t}O zI30 2al4IJ 2Irfll
p04
rv2
po4
p02
po2
wZ
pal
po2
wZ
wZ
loa
loa
12C
12C
4€
lDt
1Z(
4€
4€
I
2
I
2
1
1
1
2
I
18
19 Crrculattcn
lu r otal tjtarr 4110 l;dua.re teet tPe!'50nnel l
5tr/e
12 16 7l t5
&8
1.944
b lD
, 4r'.*
1.U4 1.1 64
? 4Q?
1.248
3.144
SDecial A rea/Xquipment
2l Self-Help Center
22@E*a
23 Administratrve Serelary Positton
24 Queuing Area
?5 Work Table, Seats 4
26 Tandem Seat
n CornputerTable
78
29 Workroom
JU V Olltr'rletr WOrKsuttlon
31 Supply Stcrage
32 Support Module
JJ
A
36
3] CASA
38Pu@c
39 Admrnstlztle Secretary
40 Queumg Ar€a
41 Tandem Seat
42
4J WorKarea
44 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Dratrer
45 Bookcase,5 Shelves
46 Support Module
47 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Drawer
48 Support Module
49 Support Module
50 File Cabinet, Vctical 4Drw Lega
51
52 \rlsltatlon Room
53 Obseruatron Room
54 Sbcrage Room
55
56 Conference Room, Seats l2
t/ woflaroom
58
59
60
DI
oa
se
csel
cta 1
wr2
wl
mlel
w2
oa
csel
oa
flc4
bcb5
miel
flc4
miel
mrel
fvb4
tr
€r
cr€
wr2
z5
30
64
1
24
JO
OU
40
z5
30
'l
t4
IJ
40
l4
40
40
9
12C
zoc
18C
28C
224
2
2
5
10
3
I
1
2
2
1
I
z
I
I
2
1
4
I
Z
1
1
1
4
i
4
4
5
10
3
1
1
1
1
I
1
7
z
1
1
z
1
1
3
I
1
I
I
I
1
5
I
4
I
1
I
J
1
1
5
5
5
t4
3
I
I
I
I
1
1
4
3
z
I
z
I
I
5
I
1
1
1
1
I
5
I
5
1
1
I
6
1
1
5
5
6
14
,
1
I
1
I
1
1
j
3
2
1
2
1
I
1
6
1
5
1
1
1
7
1
1
6
6
6
14
4
3
z
1
Z
I
Poge 284 of 356
1
1
4
I
J
168
96
168
240
120
48
168
240
48
50
OU
?0
JZ
224
JO
d0
40
25
30
14
28
IJ
40
ZB
40
40
td
lZO
200
180
280
224
168
192
168
240
120
48
168
480
48
i0D
120
320
?0
-t2.
zz4
JO
60
40
z5
30
14
28
40
2B
40
40
n
1ZO
2N
180
280
224
158
240
lou
480
120
48
168
600
48
48
175
150
98
'72
zz4
-ro
60
40
25
30
78
42
LO
4A
28
40
4A
27
120
200
180
280
168
240
tbu
600
120
48
168
lZO
48
48
125
150
3U
98
96
)o
60
40
25
30
z8
42
LO
40
28
40
40
n
120
200
180
280
274
168
288
168
600
1?0
48
tod
410
48
48
150
i80
384
98
96
JO
60
40
25
30
Z8
AA
LO
40
28
40
40
?'7
120
zoo
180
280
724
Rmnrks/Notes
hzabdh Cannon-Lyndr
larv Herzrk
Bushafd
aarrrihr alazira
'w x 6'd, per counter posti<
ub hc access
hotocopy, packel assernbly
ax, pnnter, supplies
aanle,hr alozrna I
I
5'w x 6'd, per cowrter posrtro{
I
(1) |
CASA I
CASA I
CASA, pnnhr, fax I
SAFE I
SAFE, prnter, fax I
Family Mediatic,n, pnnter, fax
Parmucnlloren v lsllng
Adj to visitatron rocm
Shared, CASA, Famrly
Medration
Shared-all programs
Shared-all programs
I

2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY COURT DIVISION: COURT PROGRAffi
Special Area/Equipmat
62he@
63 Kttchenette
64 Rebigeratcr
65 Vendtng Machtne
66 Dining Table, Seats 4
6'1 Internal Cirorlation
68 Total Breakroom
69
?O SAFE
/I lJlrectcf suMce
?2 Staff Wonkstation
?4 Family Mediation
?5 ConhactMedrator
/o
'71
?8
'79
8D
81
82
a1
84
85
86
8?
88
89
90
91
9Z
93
94
95
YD
9?
9S
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
11'7
118
119
120
121
Space Petrem€VQuetity Net S quare Feet (NS F)
NSF
Code m0: mm mt m8 ma ffi17 2no 2tI30 m$ 2050
kedl
keal
|Ke(lz
ste3
po2
wZ
p02
't7
11
lf
&
3ff/o
zo
48
120
I
1
1
2
1
z
/
1ZZ
123 Crrculahon
2501
't44
805 gz'l 841
24 Total Square Feet (Spectal Area/Equpment -

2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY DIVISION: JUDICIARY
Empl oy e Classifrcatim or
Sp ecial Area/ E quip memt
Emp loyee Classif ication
I Judge
2 Judicial Assrstant
3 Law Clerk
4 Master
5 Mast€rs Assrstant
6
'7
I
9
10
1l
12
IJ
14
ll
lo
1'7
Spacr
Codt NSF
18
19 Circulation
20 Total Staff and Souare Feet (Personnel)
4OYo
l8 2l )) 44
Special Area/Equipment
21 Courtrocrn, Specral
22 Courtrccrn, Standard
23 Courtroc,rn, Large
24 Vestrbule Entry
25 Jury Surte (w/restr'oc'rn)
26 Attomey/Client Conferenct
27 Victrm/Wrtress Wartmg
28 P;blic Waiting
29 Public Waiting
30
3l ldlsid-Ql@
32 Judge's Offrce (1 each)
33 Judge's Restroom (l each)
34 Judicial Assistant Area (1 eadt)
35 Copy/WonlclFile Area (1 eadrl
36 Internal Circulation
38 Law Clerk Offrce
39 Hearing Rocrn
40 Attc'rney/Chmt Conferenct
41 Vrctrrr/Wibness Waiting
42 Public Wartrng
43 ConfaenceRoom, Seals 2C
44 Master's Surte
45 Masieis Office
46 Master's Assrstant
4'l CopylWc,rk/FileArea
48 Internal Crorlatrsr
49 Tolal Master's Sufe
50 Courtroorn Holdne
51 Holding Cell (2 each)
s? lffFiaa A ma (1 eerl.:,\
53 Attct'ney/ClientConfertnce(l eachl
54 Secure Vestibule (2 each)
55 Internal Crculaticn
56 Courtroorn Holdng - Existng
po
po
er
er
er
er
er
er
er
oa
oa
er
er
er
oa
oa
oa
cr?
er
er
oa
er
ef
oa
er
er
5 t\.)
lvo
140
224
196
1,5 00
1,800
3,400
BO
430
120
120
200
300
900
320
80
196
150
ZOo,/o
280
1,200
120
120
200
480
lvo
140
ZOVo
4tz
BO
I]
30
PrsmneuQuantiry Net Squae Feet (NS F)
mn', m20, m30 n4 2fF,1 2m1 mm 2tBo m{ 2050
A
4 A
5
1
5
5
I
5
5
1
^
j
4
4 i
4
2
z
2
2
2
1
5
1
1
4
2
2
A
5fr%
600 2
1,200
5? Crrculatron
ZOVI
4 7't9 6-122 6 906 8r}44 8.940
58 Toial Square Feet (SDecral AreaiEqulpmmt) ?.6.212 36.134 41 434 4a 265 3 641
'l
'l
-I
5
I
]
1
I
l
1
1
6
l
1
'l
'l
'7
1
5
7
1
z I
?
7
n
9
9
9
5
1
8
8
1
I
I 1
1
9
9
9
9
9
3
j
f
3
3
1
5
2
I
2
4
2
?
A
10
l0
l0
6
1
10
10
1
10
10
1
9
l0
l0
10
10
10
4
l
3
J
3
1
6
z
1
z
4
2
2
4
tz
tz
t2
6
z
1l
ll I
1l
11
I
10
12
17
12
12
12
6
3
3
3
3 'I
6
7.
1
z
4
z
z
A
7,500
400
430
600
600
200
1,200
3,600
560
j 4r\)
240
240
400
480
1,1 20
I lr{l
iztO
397
10,500
560
8A
u0
ua
200
1,800
6,300
8+0
3,600
360
360
500
480
1,120
392
140
426
2,558
oL+
12,000
640
430
960
960
200
2,1 00
8,1 00
840
? ,4nn
360
360
600
480
1,1 20
392
140
426
2,558
824
15,000
800
430
1,200
I,200
200
2,'700
9,000
1 ,120
3,600
360
360
600
480
1,344
392
140
4'71
2,82J
824
1 6,5 00
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 18 21 JJ 31 44 26.272 36.734 41.438 48.265 53.641
60 SDace Increase Over Curent Area 262'7? 36134 41 434 44.265 53 641
Poge 286 of 356
880
430
1,320
1320
201
3,000
10,800
1,680
3,600
360
JbU
600
480
1 744
392
140
411
2,827
824
Rmaks/Not6
Loc ur Judicial Chambers
Loc rr Judicial Chambers
Loc rn Law Clerk Office
Loc rr Masters Sutte
Loc rn Masters Sult€
800% allocation model
Note.
1. Includes 2 courtroorns
fcr use by Masters
Juvenile, ncnlury (1)
Civil/criminal, jury
Ceremonial, hi gh profile
Includes closet
Includes rtcEtron area
2 law clerks pa offrce
Includes rrcEtion area
1 per 2 courirooms
Desk w/counta
Secure
Access to courtroc'rn
Current SF =

2HO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - FAMILY COURT DIVISION - EXISTING: JUDICIARY
Employ ee Cla ssifi atior tr
Special ArelEquipmet
Emplov ee C lassific atisr
1 Judge
2 Judrcral Assrslant
-i Law ultrl{
4 Master
5 Masters Assrstant
6
1
8
9
10
l1
1?
IJ
14
lf
lo
1l
18
l! L $fltlarloll
lpacr
Code NSF
po
w
er
po
w
196
AA
224
196
20 Total Staff and Square Feet FersorrnelJ 18 2:l )J 3? 44
Special AreaiIquipmmt
2i Courtroom, Specral
22 Coudroom, Standard
?? /1nrrtfrnam T ota
25 JL.ry Surte (w/restroom)
26 Attonney/C lient C onferencr
27 Victrm/Wrlness Waihng
28 Public Waiting
29 Public Warttng
30
J t ludlclal unamDers
tz -]@rt.. 1t .u"n;
33 Judge's Reshoom (1 each)
A Judrcial AssistantArea (1 each)
35 Copy,Work.trile Area (1 each)
36 Internal Circulatron
37 Heanng Room
38 Lau, Clerk Office
39 HeanngRoom
40 AttomeylClient Ccnference
41 Victim/witness Waiirng
42 PubLc 1[Iaiting
43 Conference Romn, Seats 2C
44 Mastefs Suite
45 Master's Offlrce
46 Master's As$stant
4"7 Cc,py/Viro*lFiteArea
48 Intemal Clrculatlon
49 Total Master's Suite
50 Courtroom Holding
51 Holdrng Cell (2 eadr)
5? atffrner Aeea t 1 aanhi
53 Afr.omeylClient Cc,nferarce(l each)
54 Secure Vestibule (2 each)
5J Inlernal Crrculahon
56 Courtrmm Holdrng - Exrsting
€r
€t'
€f'
er
oa
oa
€r
€r
tr
oa
oa
tr
tr
€r
oa
cr'7
4A/a
1 77t
1,80r
2,40(
Jl1
8r:
12(
l2(
zo(
35(
90(
32(
8(
19(
15(
zgt
48(
28(
80(
12(
12(
z0(
48(
Persorurd/qriltity Net Square Feet (NSF)
2frJ ?tnt 203t m4 ma ffi? 20?0 2{130 ?040 2050
4
4
5
1
5
5
?
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
z
2
z
z
z
1
7
'l
1
5
I
l
3
5
5
6
1
1
1
'1
I
3
3
3
3
1
9
I
9
5
1
I
'l
?
5
5
'l
9
9
9
9
1
3
3
n
4
3
I
l0
10
1O
6
I
l0
8
2
5
5
9
10
10
10
10
10
1
4
3
4
4
J
1
12
12
12
6
2
l1
l0
?
5
5
l0
tz
lz
tz
t2
t2
I
6
J
5
5
)
1
6,n0
400
634
600
600
1 4Dn
3.600
486
560
I,600
240
240
400
480
9,618
400
oJ+
600
600
1 100
6,300
486
840
2,400
JOU
JOU
600
480
R€markdNot€s
Loc rn Judrcral Chambers
Lo: rn Judrcral Chambers
Ld ln Law L lerR urrrce
Loc m Masters Surte
Loc m Masters Surte
800/o allocation model
Note.
1. Includes 2 courtrooms
for use by Masters
Juvenile, non-jury (1)
Civillcnrnnal, jury
Ceremcnial, high profrle
Includes closet
Includes receptron area
2 law clerks per office
€r
€r
oa
nrj
19(
141
4
1
1
j
2
.l
^
2
1
4
2
I
4
?
1
896
196
140
896
39?
140
896
392
140
896
392
140
896
)>L
140
Includes receptim area
ZUt
2,O14
J6i
2,2 90
382
2,290
)oz
z,ZgO
382
t ?Cr1
er
€r
60(
8(
4
o
4
I
4
8
4
I
4
I
2.400 2.4DO 2A00 2,400 2,4ffi 1 ptr 2 cojrtf,ooms
oa t: 4 4
j
4 4
Desk w/counter
tr 3: 8
4
8
4
I
4
8
4
I
Secure
Access to courboom
5V/'
tr 60( 3 ? 2 z z i,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Lowc level
l/ urflllallc4:I
58 Total Square Feet (Soecial Ar€arEouroment)
Ztf/,
4,65't
7'l .94.1
6,238
3't.426
I,DZZ
42.134
1 AFr'-
41.]U
8,861
53,',I65
59 Total Stalr and Square Feec TE
.,1
N 4 21.v| 31.424; 42,t34 41,14 53,165
60 Space Increase Over CurrenlArea n.941 J i -+LO 42.134 41.184 53.1 65 Currmt SF:
Poge 287 of 356
tn aot
564
oJ4
600
600
2,45 0
I,100
486
a+0
2,400
480
480
600
480
t3,140
640
b _14
600
600
J 150
9,000
486
1,1 20
2,400
480
480
600
480
15 114
800
634
600
600
3,500
10,800
486
1,680
2,4ffi
600
600
600
480

2NDJUD|c|ALD|sTR|cTcoURT-FAM|LYcoURTD|V|S|oN:TEMPoRAW
Employ e Classifrcation or
Spcial Ara/Equipmmt
EmDlovee Classfication
1 Drrector
2 Advocate
3 htake Assrstant
4
5
6
.I
8
9
10
Spacr
Codt NSF
p04
poz
w2
168
120
48
PrsmneVQmtig Net Squae Feet (NSF)
!00t m\ 2t130 m4 mfl ?m7 mm 2(r}0 2IJ4fl 2(E0
1
l
1
l1
tz
t)
l4
ll
lo
tl
l8
19 Crrorlatron
5]v'o
288 288 288 288 348
20 Total Staff and Square Feet (Personnel) 5 5 5 6 864 464 864 864 1.044
E!3s&l.@Es!p!q4
2l Reception Room, Seats 12
23 Chrld Wartrng Roorn
23 Inta.rrew Room
24
25 Female Applcant Roorr
26 Applicatron Carel
Z'l Inta'nal Ctrorlattc'n
Zg T otal Fernaie Appltcant Roorr
z9
30 Male Applicant Roorr
31 Application Carrel
3Z Intsnal Crcuiahorr
33 Total Male Applicant Roorn
34
Jl wiffl{ Afea
36 File Cabrnet, Lateral 4 Drawer
31 File Cabinet, Verttcal 4 Drw Legal
38 Suppo,rt Module
39
40 Breahoorn
41 Coffee Statlcn
4Z Refrigerator
43 Vending Madune
44 Drnmg Tab le, Seats 4
45 Internal Crculatron
46 Total Br€akroom
41
48
49
50
l1
5Z
54
rr3
er
er
se
oa
flc-4
fvb4
miel
er
kecl
keal
ked2
sieZ
3M
120
100
20
30%
z0
30%
t4
9
40
41
1'7
15
15
30%
I
6
I
4
4
1?
1
I
I
I
2.
55
56
5? Circulatron
25Vo
319 319 346
3to
58 Total Souare Feet (Sneclal Area/EqurDment) I.59? 1 59? 1_730 .'t61 1.8)0
59 Total Staff and Scuare Feet: 3 5 3 6 2,461 2,$1 25e1 2,629 2,894
60 SDace Inc!'ease Over Cuff€fltArea L-+Ot 2.461 2.5%. 2.894
1
1
I
I
I
1
6
1
j
4
12
1
I
1
1
7
1
3
I
I
1
1
I
8
1
5
6
1.2
1
I
1
1
7
1
3
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
5
8
12
i
I
1
1
z
1
4
1
1
8
1
6
l1
12
Poge 2BB of 356
1
1
1
1
2
168
JOU
48
304
120
100
120
JO
156
80
z4
104
56
108
40
4t
11
15
150
o/
zfr
lD6
JOU
48
304
1.20
100
120
JO
156
80
7.4
104
lb
108
40
4l
1'7
ll
150
o/
29o
168
360
48
3M
120
100
160
4A
zo8
100
30
130
u
108
40
4l
1'7
l5
150
ol
zn
168
360
48
304
lZO
100
160
48
208
100
30
130
112
108
40
4t
11
15
150
o/
2:i
168
480
4a
3M
lZO
100
160
48
204
120
JO
156
154
108
40
41
11
tf
150
o/
zfr
Rsnarks,/Not6
Adl to Intake Assrstant
4'w x 5'd
4'w x 5'd
Fax, prrnter, s-rpphes
Current SF =

2NO JUDICIAT DISTRICT COURT - GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION: COURT OPERATIONS
Employee Clasdfication 0
Special Ara/Equipmmt
EmploYee C lassificatiol
1 Asst. Disbict CoutAdministrator
2 Court Operatrons, Supervror
J UOUN UIETK
4 Court IntErprd.er Workstatron
5
6
'7
B
9
10
l1
tz
l4
l5
16
Spacr
Codr NSF
p06
p04
w2
NIWS
16{
4t
I
1
TD
3
persormeLieuantiq Net Square Fed (NSF)
zang 2tBt z04,A 2tlst m7 zVD 2I130 2t140 20sl
1'7
l8
19 Crculaticn
5ffz
580 62,8 D/O 8?0 916
20 Total Staffand Souare Feel (Personnel)
Special Ar€aiE quipmart
16 1 740 8&l 2.028 2.460 2.74$
21 Receptron Area, Seats 2
27
/J WorKarea
z+ $ft.rtrodul*
Z5 Court Inteareter Workstahon
26 File Cabinet, Lateral 4 Dtaws
z'7
/U UOIIEE SLAION
29 Cc'nferace Rocrn, Seah 6
30
'L
JJ
34
35
36
38
39
40
4l
4Z
43
44
45
46
4l
48
49
50
51
5?
ra1
oa
miel
wZ
flc4
kec 1
cr2
o
4C
4€
14
4l
l
2
z
1
1
t8
I
I
zo
4
I
1
LO
4
1
1
30
4
168
?68
168
8&
aaA
tod
960
168
1 ?4R
168
1,440
54
55
56
5? Circulatron
z5%
102 102 118 118 ll8
5Q Tntal Snrrqm l-ppt /Rnpniql AffarlFnrinmpnl' 510 510 588 588 588
5O Ttr.l Stoff rnrl qflrrare tr'F t' 2l a x 32 36 2.XO 2.31X. 2.616 3-O4a 3.336
50 Snace lncrease Ovr Cmmt Area z-250 z_3v. ?.616 3.048 J JJO
1
2
2
I
3
3
t
t
3
3
1
I
I
J
Poge 289 of 356
3
63
4O
96
28
4l
140
OJ
40
96
28
4l
I4f
DJ
40
144
42
41
140
OJ
40
t44
42
41
140
OJ
40
144
ia
41
140
RemarkJNotes
fwo per.pdge
Shared n workarta
iax, pnnter, supphes
Jonbact personnel
'ote.
ourt claks are to be
located near the
courtroc,rns/Ju dges tc
which thry are assigned
Current SF:

2HO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION: DISCOVERY
COMMISSIONER
Employ ee Cla ssmcatior or
Special Are/Equipmsrt
Employee Classificatimr
1 Dlscovery C cr-nmlssloner
2 Deputy Cl€rk
3
4
5
6
'l
I
9
10
11
12
t_r
14
15
ID
1'l
pacl P€rsormel/Quntity Nc Squre Fed (NSF)
NSF
Corl: 2m? 2U2t 2(B0 2tJ4,a 2tlst M7 2@D mn 2fy,g 20fl
p06
w3 64
I
2
18
19 Circulation
20 Total Staff and Square Feet ffersonnel)
5ff/.
3 1 4 4
l/o
5rt
20s
oL+
208
oL+
208
624
208
624
Special ArealEquiDmmt
21 RecEionArea, Seats 6
22
23@
24 Frle Caburet, Lateral 5 Drawer
25 File Cabinet, Vertrcal 4 Drw Lega
26 Support Module
n Coat P.ack
28 StorageCabrnet,ZDou
29 Photocopier, Medium, wrth Base
JU UOITEE SIAUON
il
32 Conference Roorn, Seats 1 [
-1)
34 Heanng Room
5)
JO
38
39
40
41
42
43
4
45
46
48
49
50
5t
52
v
55
ra3
oa
flc5
fvb4
mlel
m1(ll
sca?
r'kec
1
1
3
I I
3
I
3 128
56
5? Circulatic'n
z5al
144
58 Total Square Feei (Specral Ar€a/EqurFm€nt) lZO
c15
144
14
4C
12
t4
41
1
I
5
1
1
1
1
1
I
5
1
1
1
1
I
z
5
I
1
I
1
1
I
z
5
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
z
5
I
1
1
1
I
144
l4
45
40
12
14
41
192
744
14
45
40
12
14
42
41
zz4
1M
-J20
224
192
144
z8
45
40
1Z
14
42
4l
aai
224
192
192
148 148 148
138 t38 t38
59 Total Stalf and Square Feec -l 4 4 I 4 LUA 1344 1.362 r.362 1.362
60 Soace Increase Over Current Area +D\ 55'l 5'7 5 5'75 5-75
Poge 290 of 356
144
28
45
40
72
14
4Z
41
144
z8
45
40
72
14
i1
47
224
Remarks/Nstes
iax, pnnter, supplies
-\ffina crnrlipc
lettlement confersrces
See Judrcial program
CurrentSF: '757

2NO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION: JUDICIARY
Enplrye Clasdfrcadon or
Spcial Ara/Equipmmt
EmD lovee Classification
2 Judrcral Assistant
3 Law Clerk
4 Specialty Court Coordinator
5
6
1
8
9
i0
11
1Z
IJ
lf
to
1'7
l8
19 Crro;latron
4001
20 Total Slaffand SquareFeet Perscnnel) z7 34 43 49
Snecial ArealEouinment
21 Courtrocrn Exrslng
22 Courhoorn Standard, New
23 Courtroom, Largc
24 Vestibule Entry
25 Jury Suite (wlrestr'oo,rn)
26 AttorneylCIant Conferenct
27 V rctin'r/Wrtr ess Waiting
28 PublicWaiting
29
30
3z Judge's Office (l each)
33 Judge's Restroam (.1 eachl
34 Judicial Assistant Area (1 ea&)
35 Copy/WcnkJFrle Area (1 eadr)
36 InternalCrorlattorr
37 Judicial Chambers - Existing
38
39 Specralty Court Coordrnatot
4D Larr Clerk offtce
41
42 Hearing Roorn
43 Attc,rney/Climt Conferenc<
zl4 Victm/Wrkress Wartrng
45 Public Warttng
46
+7 Sca1sfJtdcgl$ujk
48 SenrorJudge's Office
49 Senror Judge's Assr$ant
50 CopyftVc,rMFile Area
5l Internal CrculaLion
52
53 Jury - Extsttng
55
l6
58
59
60
bl
Spac PssmneUQlmti$ Net Squde Feet (NS F)
NSF
Code 200: 2Em 2030 z04r ul5[ 2m7 mm ztB0 m4 2(t50
po
er
p04
ef
ef
er
er
er
er
er
oa
er
er
oa
oa
po4
er
er
er
oa
er
er
er
oa
32C
19f
14t
loc
1,450
1,800
2,400
80
430
lZO
lZA
zco
900
320
80
196
150
ZlVr
840
168
zga
1,000
120
lZO
200
940
196
140
zo%
JOU
8
8
a
1
1
'I
8
8
I
8
I
I
I
I
I
8
1
4
2
2
?
2
'I
1
1
l1
il
II 1
8
I
9
9
9
9
9
11
tl
1t
l1
1I
1
5
z
?
z
2
t
2
1
1
12
1Z
l?
I
9
I
10
10
10
l0
l0
1Z
12
12
12
1?
1
6
z
z
z
2
1
2
I
1
T4
T4
l4
1
10
I
11
11
11
11
11
74
l4
14
14
14
l
1
z
z
2
2
I
2
1
1
tb
lo
t6
1
lt i
1Z
1Z
17
1Z
1Z
lo
lo
lc
lo
lo
.l
I
2
2
z
2
I
2
Poge 291 of356
1
1
12,600
2,4ffi
640
3,440
960
960
1,600
l,zoo
168
1,1 z0
2.000
240
240
400
940
14,400
2,400
t2.0
3,870
1,080
1,080
1,800
9,900
168
1,400
2,000
240
240
400
94.0
16,200
2,400
800
4,3 00
1,200
1,200
2,000
10.800
168
1,680
2,000
?+0
240
400
940
1 8,000
2,400
880
4,130
1,320
1,320
z,zoo
1 2,600
168
1,960
2,000
240
240
400
940
19,800
2,400
960
5,1 60
1.440
1,440
2,400
14,400
768
2,240
2.,000
240
240
400
940
RmakdNots
Loc in Judicial Chamben (1
Loc rn Judrcnl Charnbers
Loc in Law Clerk Offrce
Loc near Speclalty
Courtxoqn
New ccnstructlon, shared
courts, 4ludges to
3 courts
Non-1ury tnal
Civil/crtrnural, jury trial (2)
Ceremonral, hr gh prohle
1ury bral
hcludes closet
I.reludes reception
law clerks per offrce
) Jury capabilities
Includes receptrc'n area
Note.
(1) Includes Specialgt
Court Judges
(2) Lnclu des courtro oms
fc,r use by Specralty Cotrl
Judges
(3) one each forprobate and
and drscovery
cofilmls$oners

2ND JUDICIAI DISTRICT COURT - GENERAT JURISDICTION DIVISION: JUDICLARY
Special Ara/Equipmet
62l@.Edd!g&.W
63 Hold:ng Cell (2 each)
64 OfficerArea(1 each)
65 Attomey/Chent Conference( l each'
66 Secure Vesttbule (2 each)
61 Intanai Circulatron
68 Courtroom Holding - Existing
69
?O Intems'Office
'11 Int€rn Workslatrcn
I Z WOfl{area/Illes
13 Internal Ctrculatton
74
75
?6 Corrfersrce Roorn, Seats 2C
't1
?8
l9 80
81
82
83
84
85
86
81
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
91
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
10?
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
1i5
1i6
117
118
Space NSF
Pusmd/QuantiQ N€i Squde Feet (NS F)
Code 2001 mT. 2I130 m4 mg mo1 2flLO 2(B0 M 2tl50
oa
tr
er
€1'
w3
oa
cr'|
412
80
15
30
5tP/o
900
398
g
50
3Cflo
480
4
I
I
I
8
1
I
1
119
120
121
122
lzJ ulrculautrI
Ztr/o
7.48'l 8,633 o xo? 10,?55 1 1,900
124 Total Square Feet (Speflal Area/Equlpment) 14.921 51.797 58.1 59 &_531 ?1.398
125 Total Staff and square Feet: t< 3{ J/ 43 I u.921 5t.191 s8.159 64.531 71.398
1 26 SDace Increase Over Cwr€nt Area 14.921 5 1.?9? 58.1 59 64.53 1 ?1 ?q!
j
I
I
I
I
I
1
5
l0
10
10
10
1
4
1
3
5
10
10
10
10
I
4
1
A
6
12
13
1Z
1Z
I
4
I
Poge 292 of 356
5
1,6+8
398
480
1,648
398
480
2,060
398
1,440
2,060
398
1,920
7 417
398
2.400
R€markYNotes
1 p€r 2 courti'ooms
Desk wi count€r
Seojr€
Access to courboom
Setlernent conferences
ani Uoannac
Curent SF =

2ND JUDICIAT DISTRICT COURT - GENERAT JURISDICTION DIVISION - EXISTING: JUDICIARY
I
z
3
4
5
5
l I9
10
1l
12
IJ
l4
15
to
11
18
l9
EmplsyE Clasdftf,adon or
Spcial Areo/Equipnat
Judge
Judicial Assislant
Law u lerH
Specialty C ourt C oordrnaLot
Crorlatron
Spacl
Cod: NSF
Po
w
p04
)lu
196
140
168
40Vo
2r,) Total Staff and Square Feet Gersonnel) Z5 ?4 3? 49
!pjg!e!.ArealEsci@g
21 Courtroorn Existfrg
22 Courtroorn Standard, New
)2 flnrr*mm T orae
24 Vestrbule Entry
25 Jury Surte (w/reslroorn)
26 Attcrney/CL€nt Conferenct
2? Victim/Wihess Warting
28 Pubhc Wartng
29
30
31 Judicral Chambem
21 rrnra'c Affiaa /1 aorh\
33 Judge's Reslrmm (1 eachl
34 Judicial Assistant Area (1 each)
35 Copy,TVorlc/File Area (l each,
36 Internal Cnculatrcn
37 Judicial Chambers - Exisiing
38
39 Specralty Court Coordinatot
40 Law Clerk Offree
4l
42 Hearing Room
43 Attcney/Chmt Conference
tl4 Victirn/Wrhress Wartrng
45 ll-rblicWart:ng
46
47 SeniorJudge's Surte
48 Senior Judgds Offrce
49 Senror Judgds Assrstant
50 Copy/\'VcrMFile Area
51 Intanal Cforlation
52
54
55
56
5'l
58
59
ffi
A1
er
er
er
er
et
er
oa
er
er
oa
oa
er
p04
er
er
er
oa
er
er
er
oa
1,500
1,800
2,400
80
360
120
120
zoo
900
3ZO
80
lvb
150
ZOVI
840
I 68
z 80
1,000
lZO
120
200
940
196
140
20Yo
PsmnevQlmtiw Net Squae Feet (NS F)
200? n2t 2{tE tIJ4[ mfl 2m7 mm 2tBo mq 21150
8
8
8
I
10
8
5
B
8
8
g
A
1
2
1
I
ll
t1
ll
I
10
9
5
9
9
9
3
3
l
3
8
1
5
1
z
1
I
12
12
12
1
10
l0
5
10
10
10
4
4
4
4
o
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
I4
T4
t4
1
10
I
tl 6
11
11
11
5
6
6
6
6
I
1
'l
z
?
2
?
z
2
I
I
lo
lo
lo
1
10
1
I
12
'7
1Z
17
17
I
I
8
I
8
I
l
8
3
3
3
3
z
2
I
Poge 293 of 356
1
l5,000
640
i,800
9ffi
960
1,60C
6;720
120
940
1 5,000
170
1,800
1.080
1,080
1,800
2,'700
6,'72c1
168
1 4nn
1.000
120
1ZO
200
910
1 5,000
800
1,800
1,200
1,200
2,000
3,600
6,?20
168
1,680
1.000
120
120
200
940
I 5,000
1,800
880
2,160
1,324
1,320
2,ZOO
5,44O
6,'tzo
168
1,960
2,000
240
240
400
1,880
15,000
1,800
7,400
960
z,Jzo
1,440
1,440
2,400
1,200
6,'72.0
168
2,240
3,000
360
360
600
1,880
RmakJNots
Loc rn Judicial Chambers (1
Loc in Judicral Chambers
Loc in Law Clerk Offtce
Loc nearSpecralty
Courtrcorn
New ccnstructton, slrared
courts, 4.1udges to
3 courts
Ncn-1ury lnal
Crvil/crrnnal, 1ury trtal (2)
Ceremonral, hrgh profi 1e
lury bial
Includes closet
Lrcludes receptton arta
2 law clerks per office
(3) Jury capabilrtres
Includes receptron area
Note:
l(1)
Includes Specialty
I CowtJudges
| (2) Includes courtrocc'ns
I
for use by Specralty Courl
I Judges
l(3)
one each for probate and
and discoverl
I corrrnlssoners

2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION - EXISTING: JUDIEIARY
Special Ar€/Equipment
52 !su@s-Eslgl!c-&
53 Holdng Cell (2 each)
54 OfficerArea (1 each)
55 Attomqr/ClientConference(l eadrl
56 Securr Vestrbule (2 each)
5'7 Internal Crrculatron
58 Co.rrtroom Holding - Existrng
DY
70 Intems' Office
17 Intem Workstatron
j? V,Icrkarea/files
i3 Internal Circulatton
t4
i5
16 Corrfertnce Roqn, Seats 2C
t'7
78 Holding - Existing
79 Holding - New
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
8?
88
89
90
91
9Z
93
94
95
96
9]
98
99
00
0l
02
03
04
05
06
OJ
08
09
l0
11
1Z
IJ
14
ll
ID
11
l8
19
zo
Space
Code NSF
€r
€r
oa
er
er
w3
oa
cr?
€r
i1a
80
15
30
))
5ff/o
900
398
64
50
3Cf/o
480
?00
Persmd/Quantity Net Square Feet (NSF)
200'; 2Ar. 203t m{ 20s mD? 2@O m3ft 2040 2050
1
4
1
'I
I
z1
z2
23 Circulatrcn
24 Total Sduare leet (SDeflal Ar€a/-bqulDment)
7A/o
6,264
3?.582
?,381
t4 191
I,1?1
46.321
9.410
56.460
10.866
65,1 96
35 Tdal Staff and SquareFeet: t< 34 3? 43 49 3?.582 44.241 $321 s6,40 65.196
26 Srace Increase Over CurrentArea 3'758? 44.ZSl 46.37'l 56.460 65.196
1
4
1
Z
I
4
I
z
I
4
1
3
I
2
1
4
Poge 294 of 356
1
4
'I
z
398
480
700
398
960
?00
398
960
loo
398
1,440
?00
e24
398
1,920
?00
824
RrmarkJNotes
I per 2 courh'ooms
Desk w/counta
Secur€
Access to courtroorn
Setlsnent conference:
and Heanngs
Current SF =

2Ho JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION: JURY COMMISSIONER
Employ e Classifrration or
Spcial AreaiEquipmmt
EmDlovee Classilication
1 Jury Commrssroner
2 Deputy Cle*
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
ll
1Z
l)
14
15
lb
l?
18
19 Circulation
20 Total Staff and Square Feet CPersonnel)
SD ecial Area,{EouiDment
?1 Rtnff OFFrnp
ZZ Check-rn CounterPosttton
23 Suppcrt Module
24 Photocopieq Medium, withBase
25 Shredder,Flocnmodel
26 Storage Cabrnet, ZDoor
Tl File Cabrnet, Lateral 4 Drawer
ZB Deputy C lerk Workstatron
Zg Intanal C:rculation
30 Total Staff Office
32 Jury Assernbly
33 Tandem Seat
34 Work Counter, Access I Stde
35 Audio/VideoEqurpmant
36 Coffee Statrc,n
31 Internal Crorlation
38 Total Jury Assembly
39
40 Quret Rocrn
41 Computtr Table
42 Charr
43
y'.y'. Ppeirnnm TTrictr
46 Grand Jury Deliberatron
4? ConfaenceAr€a, Seats 2C
48 Coffee Station
49 Grand Jury Reshoom
50
51
5Z
)5
Spacr
Code NSF
po4
w2
er
mrel
r--
SE
scz
fl04
wZ
er
csel
wca3
kecl
er
ctal
csal
fl2
er
5e
Rec I
u2
lob
4E
50%
40
47
l0
14
14
48
35Vo
'7
15
zo
4l
4AVo
200
12
50
5?0
480
4l
50
PsmneUOuatitv Net Square Feet (NS F)
ma", ?on !I)3t mfi 20fl 2m7 20?0 2tBo mq 2050
I
1
,)
I
I
I
I
z
3
I
100
2
1
1
1
4
4
2.
1
I
I
I
1
2
I
2
I
J
1
J
i68
a
84
84
3 J I 4 2.51 252 252 252 252
54
55
lb
5? Crrcr-:latron
15%
339 349 3'78 388 432
58 Toial Square Feet (Specral AreaiEqulDment) 2,600 2.615 2.900 3 3t
I
1
1
1
2
2
100
2
1
I
1
4
4
?
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
i
2
2
lZO
2
I
I
1
4
4
z
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
z
l
IZO
z
1
1
1
4
4
z
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
2
3
3
150
2
I
I
I
4
4
2
1
1
1
1
40
10
28
42
48
t4
2U
700
30
20
4l
J to
1,1 0?
zo0
100
520
50
lod
40
42
10
28
4?
96
90
348
700
30
20
41
316
1,10?
200
100
520
50
168
u
40
4Z
10
i1
96
90
348
840
30
20
4l
)!:
1,303
2.OO
100
520
50
168
40
/a
10
28
4Z
144
101
ao 30
zo
41
312
1,303
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 2 J J 4 4 2852 2,v21 3,t52 3,221 3,565
50 SDace Increase Over Curr€nt Area. 2..857 7.921 3.152 3,ZZ'7 i 565
Poge 295 of 356
200
100
520
50
168
u
40
42
i0
28
47
144
107
413
1,050
30
z0
41
456
1,597
26
100
520
50
Rmaks/Nots
Locate in staff offtce
5'w x 2'-6"d
Fax, pnnter, s-rppLe:
Office supplies
60 seats eurrantly
Forms, handouts
Soft seallrlg
(1, z)
Notes.
1. Curr€ntly couf operates
c,n individual dep arfunent
calendar system. All
irrnr lrial<

2HO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT - GENERAT JURISDICTION DIVISION: PRETRIAL SERVICES
Employee Clasification m
Spcial Ara/Equipmmt
EmDlovee Chssificatim
I D rector
z A dmin isirativ e As sistant
3 Pretnal Serv ices Offi cers, Supervtsor
4 Fretnal Serv rces Offi cen
5
6
'7
8
9
10
1l
12
Spact
Codt NSF
po4
w2
P02
w
I 68
1
1
48
20
05
Prsomd/Quatity Net S quae Feet (NS F)
2001 MA mx m4 ms mo1 2WO ltl3O m4 2060
I
I
Z
10
TJ
t4
15
to
1'l
18
19 Clrculatrc,n
5U,/o
753 1.040 1.tn 1.407 1.625
20 Tctal SLaff and Square Feel t?ersonnel) 14 zo ?1 I ,-59 119 i9l +.?71 4.474
SDecial ArealEoubment
21 Receptron A.rea
2Z Tandsn Seat
23 Child Play Arta
24
25
26@
Z'7 Support Module
Zg Photocopier, Medrum, with Bast
29 Frle Cabrnet Lateral 4 Drawa
30
3 1 C c,n feren ce Ro orn , S eats 1 2
32 Coffee Slatron
34 Laboratory
35 Holding Cell, Dry, 1 occupant
JO
38
39
40
4l
4Z
43
44
45
46
4'7
48
49
50
51
52
53
oa
cse 1
oa
oa
miel
l-flc4
cr6
kec 1
il2
Js48
j
8C
4C
42
t4
28C
4l
5C
OL
8l]
zo
1
I
1
z
1
I
I
I
I
I
2
2
ll
1
2
2
IU
I
z
t
z2
I
z
3
25
168
48
240
1,050
168
96
240
1 575
168
96
240
1,890
55
lb
57 Crrculairon
25ot't
210 210
zz3
58 Total Squar€ Feet (Suecral Area/Equroment) I 1.05 I l.ll 1-1ll I_11
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 14 n B 1,J 31 3,310 4,1m 4,7M 5,334 5,987
60 Soace Increase Over Current Area 3.310 4. i70 4.?04 5.334 5.957
zo
1
1
1
?
1
I
I
I
1
25
1
1
I
25
1
1
I
3
I
I
I
1
I
25
Poge 296 of 356
1
1
1
3
I
1
1
1
1
140
BO
40
280
4l
50
OU
80
140
BO
4D
4Z
28
280
41
50
60
80
tt5
BO
40
42
280
41
50
60
80
168
96
240
2,31 0
t75
BO
40
42
42
280
4l
50
60
80
168
96
J C'U
I Ar5
115
80
40
42
280
4l
50
60
80
Rmaks/Notes
10'w x 10'6"d (1)
ax, printer, supphes
Sample pass thru to lab
Sample pass thru frcm re$ror
Handi capped accessibl t
otes:
Sp ecial partrally enclosed
rvorkstatron requtred fc,r
climt intervrew
confidentiality and
ca Fa+rr
^€f'nar
Employee calculatrons
do not include perscnneJ
assigned lo county 1at)
and Sparks offrcers
Current SF:

2HO JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION: PROBATE COMMISSIONER
Employee Classifrcation m
Special Ar a/Equipm€ort
Emolovee Classificatimr
1 Frobate Commissioner
2 Probate Asslstant
3 Deputy Cl€rk
4 Probate Clerk
5
6
1
8
9
10
1l
17.
13
l4
15
16
11
NSF
Prsmd/Qwrtity Net SquareFeet (NSF)
Codr mol mz0lm3{ m.{ 20fl 2m7 nm 2(B0 mfi 2(}50
p(,6
w3
wZ
WZ
1ri
&
48
48
I
I
I
18
19 Circulatrc,n
20 Total Staff and Squart Fee[ (?€f,sonnel)
5U/o
j j
168
5M
;lo
648
J to
648
zto
648
zLo
648
Snecial ArearEqubment
21 RecEtion Area, Seats 6
zz
24lllsrk4lca
75 hrblic Counler
ZE Frle Cabtnel Lateral 4 Drawa
21 Support Module
Zg DocummtFrckup Statron
29 CoatRack
30 Readrrg Table, Seats 6
31 StorageCabrnet,ZDoor
32 Fhotoco,pia, Medium, with Bast
34 Ccnfermce Roorn, Seats 1C
35 HeanngRoom
36 Coffee Station
38
4A
4l
4Z
43
44
45
46
4'7
48
49
50
51
52
J-r
54
ra3
oa
SE
fla4
miel
mssl
mrdl
stdl
sca2
ne?
r--
cr5
er
keci
M
30
1A
40
z4
12
111
14
42
aan
41
1
1
z
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
55
56
J? Circulatron
25o/o
119 183 183 186 186
58 Total Squar€ Feet (Snecral Area/Equrpmenl) 895 913 913 930 930
59 Tstal Staff and Square Feet: : f f 3 1.399 1.561 1.561 1.5?8 1.5?8
60 SDace Increase Over Currmt Area 840 1.002 1.002 1.019 1.019
I
1
Z
I
1
J
1
i
1
I
1
I
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
7
1
1
4
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
'I
I
2
I
1
I
A
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Poge 297 of 356
1
fA
48
744
30
28
40
24
12
11
14
42
z 24
n1
724
64
96
48
144
30
42
40
24
1Z
11?
14
4Z
zz4
41
& 96
48
144
30
42
40
1Z
71'7
l4
42
41
64
96
48
144
30
56
40
z4
t2
11'7
t4
42
zz4
41
a1t
&
96
48
144
30
56
4D
24
1Z
17'7
t4
42
224
47
5.w X ]'-6,.d
RmakdNote
Fax, printer, supplies
Wall mounted
Attc,rney file review
OFFrnp crnnlieq
Settlemsrt conferences
See Judicial program
Current SF: 55t

COUNTY SHERIFF TRANSPORTATION: CENTRAL HOLDING
Employee Classifrcation r
Sperial Ar ealE quipm€lrt
Emolovee Classificatitrl
1 TrarrEcrtation Divrsion officas
? provide d.affing for cenbal holdtng
3
4
5
;
'7
8
9
10
11
12
IJ
t4
15
16
1l
td
Space
Code NSF
1 P C irtulattcfi 5An
20 Total Staft and Square Feet F€rsonnel)
Snecial ArearEqubment
Z1 Holding Arra
ZZ Holdurg Cell, 1 Occupant
23 Holdrng Cell, 4 Occupants
24 Tandern Seat
75 Attomey/ClimtConferenceStattqt
Z6 Conlrol Stahon
Zi Queurng Area
L6
29 Equipment Stc,rage Ronm
30 Pantry
3l Reshocrn, Unrsex
32 Jamto Closet
33 Sallypcnt
34
36 Vefricle Sallyport, Dnve-tfiru
Jd
39
40
41
42
44
45
46
4"7
48
49
JO
fI
52
]J
oa
Js6
Js8
esel
oa
€r
€!'
ilz
s
er
48
1Z
'7
l6
100
180
00
40
5C
OU
OC
1,50C
Pusmd/Qmdiy Net Squile FEt {NSF)
2{r1: m2t" 1030 m4 2{tflt zmi fr20 2tBo N4 2t50
2
z
40
6
1
1
1
I
z
1
1
I
54
55
56
f / L rrculauc'n
4A/c
1.558 1.666 1.122 1 aua tzz
58 Total Squar€ Feet (Specral Area/Equtpment) 5 454 ],UJU 6,0?o 6.026 2.526
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 5,49 5.830 6,OX 6,026 25il;
6(l Space Increase Over Current Area 5.454 5.830 6.026 6.036 7.526
4
60
8
1
1
1
I
2
1
I
4
z
80
8
1
1
1
1
z
1
1
4
2
80
I 1
1
I
l
2
1
1
I
j
7
80
I 1
i
Poge 298 of 356
I
1
z
1
1
96
144
280
96
100
180
100
140
100
60
100
2,5 00
192
144
4ZO
128
100
180
100
140
100
OU
100
2,500
192
1M
560
128
100
180
100
140
100
50
100
2,500
192
144
560
128
100
180
100
140
100
60
100
2.500
192
144
560
128
100
180
100
140
100
60
r00
Rmrks/Nots
wet cells
Wet cells
Delenhon grade
\/ ideo conferencing linked
to couriroc,rn holdrng
Z courtlines-l5 nmates
each
Flocr snk
10-12 ffnate capaclty
ccnnect to vehicle
sallyp ort
Enclosed, partially
covered
4-13 passengerbuses
Z-? passenger vans
1-5 passengc van
1 -20 passanger bus
2- automobiles
Current SF:

COU NTY SH E Rl FF TRANSPORTATION : COU RTHOUSE SECU RIIY
Emplcye Classification or
Spcial Arca/Equipmmt
Egbvee.9!cEEE!@
I Court Secunty Superutsor
2 Court Secunty Offica
3
4
5
6
,|
I
9
10
11
1Z
IJ
14
ll
Spacl P ssmnel/Quantity Net Squue Feet (NSF)
NSF
Corlr mD', m2t 2030 m4 20fl 2m1 mm 2rB0 m8 2050
WL
niws
16
lJ
l8
19 Circulation
50rn
20 Total Statt and Square Feet (Persoflnel) 28 4'l 4e
SEjel3.I@qqiws!
21 Access Conbol Area
ZZ Magnetometer
23 Package X-ray
24
Js89 i J)
5
5
A
5
I
I
5
5
4
5
5
25 Control Rocrn
26 CCTV Monitor Console
n Securrty Offrcer
28 Storage Cabtrret, 2 Door
29 Work Table, Access 1 Srde
30 Suppc,rl Module
31 InternalC:rculation
32 Total ConbolRoom
er
se
WI
scal
wtal
mrel
14
JO
1Z
25
40
35Vo
6
?
1
1
1
6
2
I
I
I
l
?
1
1
1
l
2
1
1
1
34 Seornty Offrce
35 SupervismWorkstahon
36 Conference Area (Open), Seats E
3] ReportWnturg Carrel
38 Krtchanetle
39 Inta"nal Cto:laticfl
40 Total Sectnity Office
41
42 Lo*erRoom
43 Lodcerw/pull-cutbench
44 Enlrance SoundLock
45 Intemal Crculation
46 Total LodrsRoom
4'7
48 Restroom, Small (notr ADA,
49
50 Holdrng Roorn
51
52
53
54
5J
wZ
ca4
SC
Keo I
er
SE
er
tll
er
48
48
150
"71
35Vo
I
48
zo%
30
80
2
ZO
z
z
J
1
rb
z
z
35
7
45
3
45 50
56
f / Lrclllailon
Z5o/t
'756 '7'?8 aol btJ a5?
58 Total Square Feet (Speclal Area/Equrpment) 3.7 81 3.890 4.033 4.114 4 259
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 28 J/ 41 48 53 3.781 3.890 4.O33 4.114 4.29
60 Sbace Increase Over Curstt Area 3.7 81 3.890 4.033 4.114 4.259
?
z
3
1
)) z
1
I
z
?.
3
1
45
2
I
1
2
J
I
z
1
1
4
5
5
I
3
1
1
1
3
z
3
I
50
z
Poge 299 of 356
1
1
1,500
u
17
12
z5
40
82
315
96
300
't2
71
191
/JO
?08
96
ot
^- Jbf
30
80
1,500
84
1Z
1Z
25
40
dL
3l;
96
300
]z
?l
'191
t)o
280
90
't5
451
30
80
1,J00
98
1Z
1Z
25
40
86
ifJ
96
300
'72
't1
191
/ JO
360
96
91
54t
30
80
1,500
98
1?
12
25
40
86
JJ -A
14+
300
'77
l'7
208
801
JOU
96
91
54'7
30
80
1,500
112
108
12
25
40
104
401
144
300
-tz
'7'7
208
801
400
96
99
30
80
REnarks/Notes
Located n Secuu'i$r Office
Seornty consultant to
uerifrr anntpni
Vldeo tape storag€
Radio battery charga
Fax, printer, s:pphes
4'w x2'-6"d (computer)
Divide formen and wornen
Full-height locke:
2'w x2'd
Access conhoUsecwity
officers
Shc'rl-term holding
Current SF =

COUNTY SHERIFF TRANSPORTATION: TRANSPORTATION OFFICE
Enploye Classihcation o
Special Are/Equipmmt
EllplsJe4Jafliur$isq
1 Deputy SherifDBatliff
ZDquty Sherrfltsailiff
3 SergeanUCourts
4 D+uty Sheriff/Transport
5 Lrantenant
6
7
8
9
t0
t1
12
IJ
I4
tl
tb
t'7
l8
Spacr PuomeUQuutity Net S qude Feet (NSF)
NSF
Codr 20tl: mm fr{ 84 209 TW 2ano 2(B0 frfi 2{150
nlws
niws
w?
nlwS
p04
4B
68
8
6
z
l8
l9 Crrculatrcrr
5tr/o
48 132 132 l)o t)o
20 Total Stait and Squar€ Feet (?€rsonnell J4 39 55 OJ 144 59b 396 468 468
Snecial Area/Equbm€nt
2'l Receptron Room
ZZ Tandern Seal
23 Queung Area
24
ll won{Area
26 PublicCounterPositron
21 Support Module
28 Photocoprer, Medum, vnth Base
29 Frle Cabrnel Laberal 4 Draws
30 Stcrage Cablnet, 2 Door
31 Report Wrrtrng Carrel
33 BnefingRoom
34 MovableTable, Seats 2
35 Wcnk Counter, Access 1 Srdt
36 SLorage Cabrnet, 2 Docr
31 Podrum
38 Internal Circr:laticar
39 Total BnehngRoom
40
4l Brtakroom
42 K-rtchenette
43 Refrigeratc,r
44 Vendng Machine
45 Dimng Table, Seats 4
46 Intmral Circulation
4'l Total Breakroom
48
49 Locker Roc,rn
J 0 Locker w/pull-out b errdt
51 Enbance Sound Lock
57 Intanal Circr-rlation
IJ 1 olal LOCKeT KOOnI
54
55
56
51
58
59
60
ol
€r
csel
oa
oa
mrel
pc2
flc4
sea?
se
€1:
wcal
scaz
€r
kedl
keal
kedZ
tr
se
tr
150
7
30
3C
4C
42
14
14
22
25
14
14
le
4Cert
't"l
l'J
1i
€4
35Vc
4f
ZU/c
I
6
1
1
I
I
3
1
z
zo
z
Z
1
I
1
z
j
36
z
10
8
z
l8
I
1
6
1
1
I
1
3
1
2
20
2
2
1
I
1
2
40
2
11
I
z
i
I
6
1
I
I
I
3
I
2
zo
7.
z
I
1
1
7
4
45
3
lf
10
3
z6
1
l
6
1
1
1
I
i
2
28
5
2
1
1
1
z
4
56
z
1?
14
3
28
1
1
6
1
I
I
I
3
1
2
z8
3
z
1
I
'I
z
A
& z
Poge 300 of 356
96
150
30
40
47
42
14
44
500
28
28
18
230
gtA
"t'l
1l
30
756
tJ)
-tlJ
288
96
'7'7
4bl
96
168
1 5rl
JU
40
ia
14
44
500
z8
z8
18
230
804
'71
1l
30
256
513
96
B3
499
96
lou
150
30
40
47
42
t4
44
500
28
ze
18
so+
"7'7
l't
30
256
--
l))
I l_{
360
96
91
744
168
150
30
40
4?
4Z
14
44
700
4Z
ZB
18
Jtl
1,1 03
'7'?
1'7
30
256
l)J -:-
fIJ
448
96
109
rr) 5
744
168
150
30
40
4?.
42
14
44
700
4Z
28
l6
315
I ,101
'77
1?
30
256
:-
t))
J t5
512
96
122
?30
Rmuks/Notes
D C - General Courtxo orn s
DC-Famrly Coudrooms
5'w x 2,_6'd
Fax, printer, supphes
ftffine cnnnlipc
4'w x 2'-6"d (computer)
5'w x 2'd
Drvide fcn'men and women
Fu11-height 1o*ers
2'w x 2'd

PusormeUQrmntiry Net Sqmre Fed (NSF)
SpEial Ar€ai Equipmellt NSF
Code 2m', z0?t !(Br zfy'a ttEt 20tJ7 2m0 mfl ?'J{,O ms)
62 Showrr Room, Men
63 Shower lDryurg Umt
6+ Intemal Cir.culation
65 Total Showcr Room, Men
OD
6i ShowerRoom,Womer
68 Shower /Dry:ng Untt
69 Intemal Crrculation
70 TotalShowerRoom,-Womet.
71
?2 Resbooms, Men and Worner
t)
?4 Physical Frtness
15 Single Station Exerctse Machtne
16 Multip le Station Exa'ctse Machtne
'71 Free-weight Exerctse Posttton
l8 Cardrovascular Exerose Machtnt
79 Intemal Ctrtulatton
80 Total Physical Frtness
81
B2
83
84
85
bo
87
88
89
90
91
9Z
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
101
105
106
107
108
109
110
lll
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
er
se
er
SE
er
rxml
:llm4
:xmi
SC
18
2 CP/o
2
r8
0/o
40
tvo
55
40
3ff/o
3
z
2
4
1
?
1ZO
121
122
123 Crculatron
? 50/,
'?52 toL 119 980 999
24 ToLal Souare Fed (Soectal Area/Equtpmmt) J /O I 3.810 3.896 4.900 4.996
25 Total Stalt and Souare Feet v 3p 45 s 63 3.q)5 4.2M 4.292 5.368 5.464
?f, Sna.a Tn.F^

COUNTY SHERIFF: CIVIT DIVISION
Employe Classifrcation or
Spcial Arm/Equipmmt
Emplovee Classification
1 AdmhistrationUnit
2 Chref Records Clerk
3 Office Support Specrahst
4 Office Support Specraltst
5 Account Clerk
6 Office Assistant Itr
? Office Assistant II
8 Service Unit
9 Sergeant
10 Deputy
1 t hvestrgative Assistant Sup e^v tso
1 2 Inveshgative Assistant
l4
ll
to
1'7
Spacl
Codr NSF
p04
wZ
wZ
$t/
wZ
wZ
po2
ctal
Po2
w2
168
48
48
48
48
48
lZC
12C
4E
P6smnel/Qwtity Net Squae Feet (NS F1
mD', mx m{ m4 mfl 2tn7 mm 2tBo 2IJ4,J, 2tt50
1
I
2
I
J
6
18
19 Circulatron
20 Total Siaff and Square Feet Personnel)
500,1
l9 l0 38
468
1.4rX
oJo
1,908
696
2.088
'756
2.268
840
7.520
Snecial Area/XouiDment
21 @4cr4girq!c-&e
22 A-rblic Counter Queuing
23 Tandern Seat
24 Wcnk Counler, Access 1 Sld€
Zi Intanal Crarlatrc'n
26 Total Public Counta Watttng
z ! E,reawo(in
28m;;r.
29 Dining Tab le, Seats 4
30 Vendrrg Machine
31 InternalCirculaticn
32 Total Breakroom
33 Administratbn Unit
34 Accotnt Office
35 Offrce Support Spectaltst Workstattofi
36 Account Cla-k Wc,rkstattcn
37 Suppcrt Module
3B Frle Cabrnet Lat€ral 4 Drawer
39 Internal Crculatron
40 Total Account Offrce
41@
42 Fhotocopier, Mednrm, with Bast
43 Support Module
44 File Cabinet, Lateral 5 Drawa
45 Safe
46 Stcnage Cabrnet, 2 Docr
47 Wcrkstalrcn, shared
48
49 Service Unit
50 Wc,rk Area
51 Suppc,rt Module
52
54
55
oa
oa
csel
lryca5
er
Keo I
ked2
wZ
wZ
miel
fril
oa
r-miel
flc5
se
scaJ
w1
oa
mrel
48 '7
24
Z5or'o
1l
't5
ll
30Vo
48
48
40
30Vo
40
l4
18
15
JO
40
?
l0
2
I
a
I
I
2
1
1
I
I
56
I / Ulrcutatlon
7.5n/,
218 360 384 389 404
58 Total SquareFeet (Specral Area/EqurpmentJ 391 1.800 1.922 1.944 z.ozz
59 Total Staff and Square Feet: 19 1'1 30 JJ 38 2,1'96 3,m8 4,O10 4.2L2 4.542
60 Space Increase Over Currstt Area 2'795 3.?08 4.010 A J1'i 4 547
1
1
1
2
4
3
1
6
1
'l
4
t0
z
1
4
2
I
z
1
2
1
I
3
1
2
1
I
1
1
1
7
5
3
I
l
I
I
4
10
2
1
5
?
I
2
1
2
I
1
3
I
2
1
1
1
1
Z
o
1
I
1
9
4
12
z
1
5
7
I
z
1
?
I
1
3
1
?
1
1
7
1
3
I
7
i
9
I
10
4
1Z
2
1
5
7
I
3
1
z
Poge 302 of 356
I
1
3
1
2
1
i
168
192
96
120
12
288
96
10
48
54
268
l'l
zz5
30
100
432
48
48
40
14
l%
42
40
z8
18
15
JO
40
168
48
197
144
120
144
120
rJo
192
'70
48
18
388
'77
300
30
122
529
48
96
40
28
&
Lto
42
40
47
18
30
50
40
168
48
240
144
120
168
120
384
i92
lo
48
t8
388
11
5lJ
30
145
6n
48
96
40
&
L to
40
42
18
30
JD
40
168
48
288
144
1ZO
192
120
432
192
84
48
81
405
1'7
5t)
30
145
6?'7
48
96
40
Z8
64
ZJO
40
4Z
18
30
,o
40
l6b
96
384.
96
120
Lto
1ZO
4$l
192
u
48
8l
405
7l
30
: ozJ
48
144
rtO
28
?s
338
42
40
42
18
30
JO
40
Rmdks/Not6
Locat€ at pubhc cowrter
Locate in Account Offrce
Locate in Account Office
Locate aL pubhc cotrntet
Note.
Wc,rkstations at pub ltc
counter to have rmpact
Fac,cfrhl dlDcc
per count€r
posfron
Pubhc use
Pnnt fax, suppiles
hintc, fax, suppiles
Floor model
Protectr on Order System
hinta, fax, srpptles
Currmt SF =

COMMON / SHARED SUPPORT
Employe Classifrcatim or
Spcial Ara/Equipnat
Ellplsvc9-gb$[ilslis!
1 Tedrnrcran
z
3
4
5
6
l 8
9
10
'Il
12
IJ
14
ll
lo
1l
18
19 Crrculatron
5jnt
20 Toial Staff and Square Feet (Persomel): I l2 12 13
Sp ecial AreaiXquiDment
21 Building Lobby
22 Public Lobby
23 Seo:nty Screemng Area
24 Access Cc'nbol Arta
25 Securrty Office
zo
2? Lunchroom/Breakro o,rn
28 Krtdenette
29 Vendlng Machrne
30 DinrngTable, Seals 4
31 Int,rnal Circulation
JL lotalLuncnroo(n/lJr€atirooff
34 Mail Cmter
J]
36 Loadne Dodr
37 Loadng Dod<
38 Dock Recervmg Area
39 Dehv ery ReceipVStagin g
40 TrashlRecyc le Durnp ster
41 Parking, Serrrice Vel, iclr
42 Parking Sedan/Small Trud

COMMON / SHARED SUPPORT
Special Are/Equipmet
K? Fifnecc Fenilihr - hfelp
63 Resiroorn, Medrum
64 Locker w/Individual Bench
of snower
66 Intemal Circulatron
6'l Total Lodrer/Shower - Mal€
68
?0 Restroorn, Medlum
? 1 Locker wAndiv idual Bench
?2 Shower
?3 Intemal Circulatron
-14 Total Lodco/Show€r - Femalr
-t5
:6@
7? Krtchenette
78 VcrdingMachine
79 Dning Table, Seats4
80 Intemal Clrculahon
81 Total Break Room
82
83 Gmaal Building Sicrage
84
85 Medu Room
86 Confbrence Roorn, Seats 103
8?
88
89 Child Care Faolity
90
91
92 C ourt T echnol o gy- Stora ge
93
94 Jarutcr Closet
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
10?
108
109
110
111
tlz
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
1?Z
lz5 ulrcula[on
Codr NSF
rl4
lll
s1
tl4
lll
-1
kedl
ked2
st€Z
tr
cr?
cr8
€f
oa
er
1 JY
9
?.1
2sYo
139
9
2l
Z5r/o
]l
t5
Z5Vo
Z,OOC
48C
) 5C
201
8C
1Ut
Persmd/Qwtity Net Squae Fet (NS F)
mot mx 2030 m4 2050 2tD7 mm 2(I30 m{ 2050
1
2'7
3
I
10
z
1
2
2
1
I
I
)
1
10
z
I
2
2
I
8
1
3
1
10
z
1
2
3
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
3
1
l0
z
1
z
3
I
I
I
'I
I
I
t
3
1
10
?
1
2
)
I
B
139
L4_\
OJ
111
556
I Jv
90
47
68
339
'7'l
30
150
g
321
2,000
480
1,332
350
200
640
1-Str/
t5>
288
DJ
otJ
90
4Z
68
JJ:
't'l
30
150
&
321
2,000
480
1,332
| /.4 | fr.At Sduam f rct tsDeclat ffea/EoutDmenf, l 20.?58 zo.8zo 2o.923 20.923 709?,3
25 Tdal Staff and Square Feet: 1 t2 l2 t2 L2 to.?58 20.820 20.94 20.923 20.98
126 Soace Increase Over Currmt A-rea za.l58 20_820 zo.9z3 20.923 zo.9z3
Poge 304 of 356
200
6+0
1.893
139
288
OJ
613
139
90
4Z
68
339
]'t
30
zz5
o)
415
2,000
480
350
200
&o
1.902
139
288
DJ
: ol J
139
90
4Z
-;
Dd
J)>
1'l
30
2?5
83
415
2,000
480
1,332
350
200
&0
i.902
139
288
OJ
.1_4.
613
1 39
90
42
6B
3 39
11
30
zz5
83
415
2,000
480
1,332
JJU
200
640
1.902
RmdkdNot6
lncl. Lockers fon LEED
tnct LocKe!'s tor JJLLJ)
Also use fcr traimng
Press conferences
Divisible, shared by all
building occupants
To be confrmed,
short-lerrn child care
center - not cerhfied
Fcrrar!

Code Description
SECTION A - Workstqtions
WI
w2
W3
W4
W5
W6
POt
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
P07
PO8
PO9
Open Systems Workstotion
Open Systems Workstotion
Open Systems Workstotion
Open Systems Workstotion
Open Systems Workstotion
Open Systems Workstotion
SECTION B - Privote Offices
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Privote Office
Poge 305 of 356
Size
6'x6'
6'x8'
8'x8'
8'x l0'
12'x8'
12'x10'
12'x9'
12'x10'
l4' x l0'
14'x12'
14'xl4'
14'xl6'
l4'x20'
16'x2O'
16'x24'
NSF
36
48
64
ttu
96
120
108
120
140
r68
'196
224
2BO
320
384

Code Descilplion
SECTION C - Conference
CAI
CA2
C43
C44
CRI
CR2
CR3
CR4
CR5
CR6
CR7
CRB
CR9
SECTION D - Receotion
RAI
RA2
RA3
R44
RA5
RRI
RR2
RR3
TLI
TL2
ILJ
TL4
WRI
WR2
Conference Areo (Open), Seqts 2
Conference Areo (Open), Seqts 4
Conference Areo (Open), Seots 6
Conference Areo (Open), Seots 8
Conference Room. Seots 4
Conference Room, Seots 6
Conference Room. Seots 6
Conference Room, Seots 8
Conference Room, Seots l0
Conference Room, Seots l2
Conference Room, Seots 20
Conference Room. Seots .|03
Conference / Troining Room
Receotion Areo, Seots 2
Reception Areo, Seots 4
Reception Areq, Seots 6
Reception Areo, Seots 8
Reception Areo, Seots l4
Receotion Room. Seots 6
Reception Room, Seots 8
Reception Room, Seots l2
SECTION E - Speciol Purpose
Restroom, Smoll (non-ADA)
Restroom, Unisex
Restroom, with Shower
Restroom, Medium
Workroom
Workroom
Poge 306 of 356
Size
6'x l0'
'10' x l0'
l0'x 14'
l0'x 15'
l0' x l l'-6"
l0'x l4'
12'x12'
12'x16'
14'xl6'
l4'x20'
l6'x 30'
27'x49'
40'x62'
9'x7'
9'x12'
12'x12'
l2'x16'
19'x 16'
12'x12'
12'x16'
l9'x l6'
6'-1" x5'-O"
7'-0" x7'-2"
l0'-6" x7'-6"
16'-O" x 8'-8"
12'x14'
l4'x16'
NSF
60
r00
r40
150
128
140
144
192
224
280
480
1,332
2,48O
63
r08
144
t92
304
144
192
304
30
^n
79
139
168
224

Code Description
SECTION F - Equipment ond Furnishinos
BCA2
BCA3
BC44
BCA5
BC46
BCAT
BC82
BC83
BC84
BC85
BC86
BCBT
BCC2
BCC3
BCC4
BCC5
BCC6
BCCT
CCAI
CCBI
CTAI
CTBI
Bookcose, 2 Shelves
Bookcose, 3 Shelves
Bookcose, 4 Shelves
Bookcose, 5 Shelves
Bookcqse, 6 Shelves
Bookcose, 7 Shelves
Bookcose. 2 Shelves
Bookcose, 3 Shelves
Bookcose, 4 Shelves
Bookcose, 5 Shelves
Bookcose, 6 Shelves
Bookcose, 7 Shelves
Bookcose, 2 Shelves
Bookcose, 3 Shelves
Bookcose, 4 Shelves
Bookcose, 5 Shelves
Bookcose. 6 Shelves
Bookcose, 7 Shelves
Cord Storoge Cobinet, l0 Drower
Cors Storoge Cobinet, 20 Drower
Computer Toble
Comouter Toble
Poge 307 of 356
Size
36"x15"x30"
36"x15"x42"
36"x15"x54"
36" x 15" x66"
36" x 15" x78"
36"x.|5"x90"
48"x.|5"x30"
48" xl5" x42"
48"x.l5"x54"
48" x15" x66"
48" x15" x78"
48" x 15" x90"
60"x15"x30"
60" x 15" x42"
60" x 15" x54"
60" x 15" x66"
60" x15" x78"
60"x15"x90"
20" x30" x29"
20" x30" x52"
48" x30" x27"
72" x30" x27"
NSF
t0
t0
r0
t0
t0
t0
1?
ta
t3
IJ
t3
IJ
t6
t6
t6
l6
t6
t6
tz
12
24
36

Code
DCAI
DCA2
DC43
DC44
DCBI
DCB2
DC83
DC84
DCCI
DCC2
DCC3
DCC4
DRAI
DRBI
MCAI
MCBI
TCAI
TCA2
TC43
TC44
TCBI
TC82
TC83
TC84
TCC I
ICC2
T/-r'a
TCC4
TRAI
TRBI
TRCI
Description
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Cobinet
Doto Storoge Rock, Rolling
Shredded Doto Rock, Rolling
Microfilm Storoge Cobinet, l0 Drw
Microfilm Storoge Cobinet, 20 Drw
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Cobinet, with Doors
Tope Storoge Rock
Tope Storoge Rock
Tope Storoge Rock
Poge 308 of 356
Size
36"x.l8"x36"
36"x18"x5l"
36" x 18" x67"
36"x18"x83"
42"x.l8"x36"
42"x.l8"x5l"
42" x1B" x67"
42"x.l8"x83"
48"x.l8"x36"
48" x .l8" x5.l"
48" x18" x67"
48"x18"x83"
39"x16"x48"
42" x30" x73"
20" x30" x29"
20" x3O" x52"
30"x14"x36"
30"x14"x51"
30" x l4' x67"
30"x14"x83"
42" x14" x36"
42" x14" x51"
42" x14" x67"
42" x14" x83"
48" x14" x36"
48" x14" x51"
48" x14" x67"
48"x14"x83"
36"x14"x73"
42" x14" x73"
48" x14" x73"
NSF
t5
t5
'Itr
t5
t8
t8
t8
IB
20
20
20
20
t5
9
12
12
il
il
il
il
t3
t3
IJ
r3
lL\
lra
t5
t5
il
IJ
r5

Code
FLA2
FLA3
FLAA
FLAs
FLB2
FLB3
FLB4
FLBs
FLC2
FLC3
FLC4
FLCs
FLD2
FLD3
FLD4
FLDs
FLSP
FOAI
FOA2
FOA3
FOA4
FOBI .
FO82
FO83
FO84
FVA2
FVA3
FV44
FV45
FV82
FVB3
FVB4
FVB5
FVSP
FWA
FWB
FWC
PCI
PC2
PC3
Description
File Cobinet, Loterol 2 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterql 3 Drower
File Cobinet. Loterol4 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol5 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 2 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 3 Drower
File Cobinet. Loterol4 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 5 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 2 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 3 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 4.Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 5 Drqwer
File Cobinet, Loterol 2 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol 3 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol4 Drower
File Cobinet, Lqterol 5 Drower
File Cobinet, Loterol, Speciol
File Cobinet, Open, Letter
File Cobinet, Open, Letler
File Cobinet, Open, Letter
File Cobinet, Open, Letter
File Cobinet, Open, Legol
File Cobinet, Open, Legol '
File Cobinet, Open, Legol
File Cobinet, Open, Legol
File Cobinet. Verticol 2 Drw Letter
File Cobinet, Verticol 3 Drw Letler
File Cobinet, Verticol4 Drw Letter
File Cobinet, Verticol 5 Drw Letter
File Cobinet, Verticql 2 Drw Legol
File Cobinet, Verticol 3 Drw Legol
File Cobinet, Verticol4 Drw Legol
File Cobinet, Verticol 5 Drw Legol
File Cobinet, Verficol, Speciol
File Cobinet, Woll Mounted, I Drw
File Cobinet, Woll Mounted, I Drw
File Cobinet. Woll Mounted, I Drw
Photocopier, Smoll, with Bose
Photocopier, Medium, with Bose
Photocopier, Lorge, with Bose
Poge 309 of 356
Size
30"x18"x29"
30"x18"x42"
30"x18"x52"
30"x18"x60"
36" x 18" x29"
36"x18"x42"
36" x 18" x52"
36"x.l8"x60"
42" x18" x29"
42" x 18" x42"
42" xl8" x52"
42" x 18" x60"
48" x18" x29"
48" x18" x42"
48" x18" x52"
48" x 18" x60"
See Progrom
36"x12"x8O"
36"x12"x9O"
48" x12" x80"
48" x12" x9O"
36"x.|5"x80"
36"x15"x90"
48"x.l5"x80"
48" x15" x 90"
15" x28" x29"
15" x28" x42"
15" x28" x52"
15" x28" 60"
18" x28" x29"
18" x28" x42"
18" x28" x52"
18" x28" x6O"
See Progrom
24" xl6" x .l3"
36"x16"x]3"
48"xl6"x.l3"
48" x26"
60" x 36"
136" x126"
NSF
t0
t0
t0
t0
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
14
t6
t6
t6
t6
0
t'l
il
l4
14
12
12
t5
t5
8
8
8
8
9
I 9
9
U
t0
14
t9
30
42
172

Code
ISAI
ISA2
ISA3
ISBI
IS82
IS83
ISCI
rsc2
ISC3
SCAI
SCA2
SCA3
SCBI
SC82
SC83
SCCI
SCC2
e/-/^ ?
SSAI
SSA2
SSA3
SSBI
SS82
SS83
SSCI
SSC2
qqa?
Descriplion
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Industriol Shelving, Open
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Cobinet, 2Door
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Storoge Shelving, Closed Bock / Ends
Poge 310 of 356
Size
36"x12"x72"
36"x18"x72"
36" x24" x72"
42" x12" x72"
42" x18" x72"
42" x24" x72"
48" xl2" x72
48" x18" x72"
48" x24" x72"
36"x12"x72"
36"x18"x72"
36" x24" x72"
42" x12" x72"
42" x18" x72"
42" x24" x72"
48" x12" x72"
48" x18" x72"
48" x24" x72"
36"x12"x72"
36"x18"x72"
36" x24" x72"
42" x12" x72"
42" x18" x72"
42" x24" x72"
48" x12" x72"
48" x18" x72"
48" x24" x72"
NSF
I
tl
12
il
t3
14
12
14
t6
12
14
'tR
l7
20
t8
20
22
I
il
12
il
t3
14
12
14
t6

Code
WCAI
WCA2
WC43
WCA4
WCA5
WCA6
WCAT
WCAS
WCBI
WCB2
WCB3
WC84
WCB5
WC86
WCBT
WCBS
STAI
STA2
STA3
STBI
STB2
STB3
STCI
WIAI
WIA2
WIA3
WIA4
WIA5
WIA6
WTBI
WIB2
WIB3
WIB4
WIB5
WIB6
Descriplion
Work Counter. Access I Side
Work Counter. Access I Side
Work Counter, Access I Side
Work Counter, Access I Side
Work Counter, Access I Side
Work Counter, Access I Side
Work Counter, Access I Side
Work Counter, Access I Side
Work Counter, Access 2 Sides
Work Counter, Access 2 Sides
Work Counter, Access 2 Sides
Work Counter. Access 2 Sides
Work Counter, Access 2 Sides
Work Counter, Access 2 Sides
Work Counter, Access 2 Sides
Work Counter. Access 2 Sides
Drofting Toble, Smoll
Drofting Toble, Medium
Drofting Toble, Lorge
Loyout Toble, Smoll
Loyout Toble, Medium
Loyout Toble, Lorge
Light Toble
Work Toble, Access I Side
Work Toble, Access I Side / I End
Work Toble, Access I Side / 2 Ends
Work Toble, Access All 4 Sides
Work Toble, Access 2 Sides
Work Tqble, Access 2 Sides / I End
Work Toble. Access I Side
Work Toble, Access I Side / I End
Work Toble, Access I Side / 2 Ends
Work Toble, Access All 4 Sides
Work Toble. Access 2 Sides
Work Toble, Access 2 Sides / I End
Poge3ll of356
Size
36" x24" x36"
36" x24" x42"
36"x30"x36"
36" x3O" x 42"
48"x30"x36"
48" x3O" x42"
48"x36"x36"
48" x36" x42"
36" x24" x36"
36" x24" x42"
36"x30"x36"
36" x3O" x42"
48"x30"x36"
48" x3O" x42"
48" x36" x36"
48" x36" x42"
60" x 30" x42"
72" x30" x29"
84" x36" x29"
60" x 36" x29"
84" x42" x29"
126" x48" x29"
48" x42" x29"
60" x30" x29"
60" x 30" x29"
60" x30" x29"
60" x 30" x29"
60" x 30" x29"
60" x 3O" x29"
72" x30" x29"
72" x30" x29"
72" x30" x29"
72" x30" x29"
72" x30" x29"
72" x30" x29"
NSF
14
l4
'l A,
t5
24
26
34
34
2l
2l
23
ZJ
32
JZ
34
34
30
36
46
30
46
74
26
25
38
50
1q
38
56
33
47
6t
88
45
68

Code
STDI
STE I
STE2
STE3
STE4
MIAI
MIBI
MICI
MIDI
MSSI
CSAI
CSBI
CSCI
CSDI
CSEI
CSFI
KEAI
KEBI
KECI
KEC2
KEDI
KED2
Description
Reoding Toble, Seots 6
Dining Toble, Seots 4
Dining Toble, Seots 4
Dining Toble, Seots 4
Dining Toble, Seots 4
Flot Mop File
Movoble File
Verticol Plon Holder
Coot Rock
MoilSorting Stotion
Choir
Sofo, Seots 2
Sofo, Seots 3
Not Used
Tondem Seot
Toblet Arm Choir
Refrigerotor
Kitchen Unit
Coffee Stotion
Kitchenette
Kitchenette
Vending Mochine
Poge 31 2 of 356
Size
96" x48" x29"
36" x36" x29"
60" x 3O" x29"
42" roundx29"
48" roundx29"
54" x36"
See Progrom
48" x36"
48" x18"
48" x3O"
33" x 33"
66" x 33"
96" x33"
IB" x 18"
24'x24'
33" x 30"
51" x24" x87"
90" x24"
66" x27"
168" x24"
36" x 30"
NSF
117
64
75"
64
72
36 n
t6
12
24
12
25
36
7
8
17
26
4l
33
77
tq

Code
PCAI
PC42
PCA3
PCA4
PCCI
PCC2
PCDI
PCD2
PCD3
PCD4
PCD5
MIEI
MIE2
EXMI
EXM2
EXM3
EXM4
EXMS
EXM6
LLI
LL2
BNBI
BN82
BNB3
Description
Public Counter
Public Counter
Public Counter
Public Counter
Public Counter w / Tronsoction ToP
Public Counter w / Tronsoction ToP
Public Counter w / Return
Public Counter w / Return
Public Counter w / Security Glozing
Public Counter w / Security Glozing
Public Counter w / Security Glozing
Support Module
Support Module
Single Stotion Exercise Mochine
Single Stotion Exercise Mochine
Double Stotion Exercise Mochine
Multiple Stotion Exercise Mochine
Free-weight Exercise Position
Free-weight Exercise Position
Locker w / Individuol Bench
Lockerw/ShoredBench
Bosketboll Court - NBA & NCAA
Bosketboll Court - High School
Bosketboll Court - Holf Courf
Poge 31 3 of 356
Size
3'x7'-6"
3'-6" x7'-6"
4'x7'-6"
5'x7'-6"
5' x l0'-6"
6' x 10'-6"
5'x l0'
6'x l0'
5'xll'
6'xll'
8'xll'
96" x24"
96" x96"
96" x60"
96" x84"
60" x .l68"
.l88" x 188"
60" x132"
90" x96"
18" x71"
18" x47"
70'x114'
70'x1O4'
70'x62'
NSF
23
27
30
38
53
63
48
60
66
88
40
64
40
56
70
r96
55
60
9
7
7,980
7,280
4,380

Code Descriplion
SECTION G - Justice Focililies
JSI
JSI A
J).2
JS2A
JS3
JS3A
J54
JS4A
J55
JSSA
JS6
tc7
JS8
JS9
JSI O
JSI I
JSI2
JS] 5
JSI 6
JS4O
JS4OA
JS4I
JS42
J543
JS44
J545
J546
JS47
J54B
JS49
Wet Cell, I Occupont
Dry Cell, 1 Occupont
Wet Cell. I Occuoont
Dry Cell, 1 Occupont
Wet Cell, I Occupont
Dry Cell, 1 Occupont
Wet Cell, 1 Occupont, Hondicopped
Dry Cell, 1 Occupont, Hondicopped
Dormitory Bed, Single Occupont
Dormitory Module, 4 Occuponts
Holding Cell, I Occupont
Holding Cell, I Occupont
Holding Cell, 4 Occuponts
Holding Cell, 8 Occuponts
Holding Cell, l6 Occuponts
Detoxificotion Cell, 8 Occuponts
Detoxificotion Cell, 8 Occuponts
Sofety Cell, I Occupont
Sofety Cell, I Occupont
Counseling Room - Contoct
Counseling Room - Non-Contoct
Visiting Booth - Non-Contoct
Attorney Visiting Booth - Non-Contoct
Booking Coge
Video Arroignment Room
ControlStotion
Control Room
Jonitoriol Closet
Loundry Room
Photo / l,D, Stotion
Poge 314 of 356
Size
7'x1O'
7'xlO'
7'-8" xlO'
7'-8" x lO'
B'x l0'
8'x l0'
8'x l0'
8'x l0'
7'-6" x 6'-8"
15' -6" x 14'
8'x6'
7'-6" x8'
6'x12'
1O'x12'
l2'x l8'
l3'x l3'
l3'x l4'
8'x7'-6"
9'x l0'
7'x1O'
7'xl4'
5'x l3'
5'xl4'
7'x7'
17'x17'
8'x l0'
l0'x 18'
l0'x6'
8'x l0'
12'x6'
NSF
70
70
77
77
80
80
80
80
50
217
48
60
72
120
216
169
182
60
90
70
98
65
70
49
289
80
r80
60
80
72

Code
JS6O
J56I
J562
J563
J564
JS65
JS66
J567
JS7 I
JS72
JS73
JS74
JS75
JSSO
JSSI
JS82
JS83
JS84
JS85
J586
JS87
JS88
JS89
Descriplion
Informol Heoring Room
Formol Heoring Room
Smoll Jury Triol Courtroom (8 Jurors)
Medium Jury Triol Courtroom (8 Jurors)
Smoll Jury Courtroom (14 Jurors)
Juvenile Non-Jury Courtroom
Medium Jury Triol Courtroom (14 Jurors)
Lorge Jury Triol Courtroom (14 Jurors)
Courlroom Soundlock
Victim / Witness Woiting
Attorney / Client Conference
Jury Deliberotion Suite (8 Jurors)
Jury Deliberotion Suite (14 Jurors)
Potient Room - Single Occupont
Potient Word - Four Occuoonts
Potient Word - Four Occuponts
Potient Word - Four Occuponts
Exominotion Room
Exominotion Room
Interview Room
lnterview Room
Security Screening Areo
Access ControlAreo
Poge 31 5 of 356
Size
20' x 30'
27'x3l'
36' x 40'
36'x43'
36' x 42'-6"
36' x 43'
36' x 45'-6"
36' x 55'
8'x lO'
l0'xl2'
10'x12'
14'x25'
14'x32'
l0'x l0'
l8'x22'
2l'x20'
20'x l8'
9'x12'
16'x 15'
l0'x l0'
B'x l0'
12'x12'
l5'x25'
NSF
600
840
1,440
1,548
r,530
1,548
1,640
1,980
80
120
120
350
470
100
396
430
360
r08
240
100
BO
144
375

Poge 31 6 of 356
APPENDIX B
SPACE STANDARDS

Poge 31 7 of 356

PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-2
120 NsF
HOgeJr6OrJCO
02t4'6t8t
tllll
PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-z 120 NSF
Scele

PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-3
t40 NsF
Poge 31 9 of 356
02'A',6't'
lllll
PRTVATE OFFICE
PO-3 140 NSF
Scalp

PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-4
r 68 NSF
HOge JZU Or JCO
0
I
PRIVATE OIIFICE
PO-4 168 NSF
z'. 4'. 6' I'
tttl

PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-5
I 96 NSF
l'oge Jz I oT Jco
0z'4'6'E'
PRTVATE OFFICE
PO-s 196 NSF
Scale

224 NSF
'-age
Jzz or Jco
02'4'.6't'
PRTVATE OFFICE
PO-6 224 NSF
Scale

PO-7
280 NSF
roge JzJ oT Jco
02'4'6'8'
trltl
PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-7 280 NSF

PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-8
320 NSF
tr
ffi! re
Poge 324 of 356
OT
tl
PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-8 320 NSF
469'

PRIVATE OFFICE
PO-9
384 NSF
trffi
ffit wre
Poge 325 of 356
02'4'f'.t',
PRTVATE OFFTCE
PG.9 384 NSF
Scele

JUSTICE FACITITIES. INFORMAL HEARING ROOM
JS60
600 NsF
DTSPLAY Bmmtrn
mmmDm
gggOe
ggeg
Poge 326 of 356
o0
0e
0c
o0
00
oo
0 2' 1' 6', 8' 10' 12', 14' 16'
trttlllll
Scele

JS6l
837 NSF
LITIGANT
goo
c0eeo
*'h
| - bpectlroR
L _ -.i (1e)
SOUNDLOCK
Poge 327 of 356
LITIGANT
geg
BACQO
02,4'6
tttl
8' 10' 12 14', 16'
rttll

J562
t,440 NSF
TO ATTY.
CLIENT INTV
TO COURT
HOLDING
JUDGE
o
WHERE REQUIRED
r--'t r
r&l
tl
L-J
SPECTA']
lTfQ8
SOUNDLOCK
HOge JZ6 Or JCO
0
I
T4'er
ttll
l0' l? 14' 16
tttl

I,548 NSF
TO ATTY.
CLIENT INTV.
TO COURT
HOLDING
JUDGE
C
WHEELCHAIR LIFT
WHERE REQUIRED
otseGI -- gEeGEO
'Iai'-b@gge
SOUNDLOCK
Poge 329 of 356
o r 4' 6 8' 10' 12' 14', 16'
ttlrlllll
Scrl€

TO ATTY.
CUENT INTV.
FACILITIES -
o i3- 0
cOcO
JUDGE
SOUNDLOCK
POge JJU Or JCO
lu
lo
lB
l0
lo
lo
02.4)
rtl
e
c
6 8' 10', 12' 14' 16
tttttl

|,548 NSF
TO ATTY.
CLIENT INTV
WHEELCHAIR LIFT
WHERE REQUIRED
SOUNDLOCK
Poge331 of356
Eeegg
02'4t6t'
tttll
l0' 12' 14' 16'
tlll

J566
|,640 NSF
TO ATW.
CLIENT
INTV.
TO COURI-
HOLDING
JUDGE
o,
WHEELCHAIR LIFT
WHERE REQUIRED
l--l
seeGL:J,.,
EQEGO $2)
i,oge JJZ or Jco
o c
o
e co
E
o o0coe
02'4'6'8'lU
rrtltl
12' 14, 16,
rtl

J567
I,980 NSF
TO ATTY.
CLIENT
INTV.
TO COURT
HOLDING
WHEELCHAIR LIFT
WHERE REQUIRED
SOUNDLOCK
Poge 333 of 356
0
I
2' 4' 51 8l
tltl
l0 12' 14', 16'
tttl

WORKSTATION
w-l
36 NSF
L---l-
/\. I
-!---i
'(}i,
Poge 334 of 356
l-t
Lr
021
tl
4'.
I
6f 8l
tl

w-2
48 NSF
Poge 335 of 356
02|
tl
4'.6rE
tll

w-2
48
NSF
I
3l
1_
Poge 336 of 356
0214'.
ttl
6f E'
tl

WORKSTATION
w-3
64 NSF
w3-A w3-c
w3-B w3-D
Poge 337 of 356
o2,4'6'S
lllll
Scalc

WORKSTATION
w-4
80 NSF
I
I
I
r<
l'
I
t_
I
+-
I
t-
I
8'-0"
./ .=.
LJ
FLB5 F'LB5
Poge 338 of 356
02'4'6'8'
rtttl

WORKSTATION
w-5
96 tv NSF rtv! 6
w5-A
8'-0"
)l
c
Poge 339 of 356
I
\"/
UU
w5-c
02,4'6'g
rlttl

w-6
| 20 NSF
L------1-
h,oge J4U ot JCO
I
0t
tl
4t 6'
tl
8',
I
Scalc

District Court Stondords - JudiciolSet
Litiqation Space Large Standard Special
Courtroom
Hearing Room
Vestibule Entry
Jury Suite (drestroom)
Atty./Client Conf.
Victim/Ullitness Waiting
Holding Cell
Atty./Client Conf.
(secure)
Officer Area
Secure Vestibule
Public Waitinq
2,400
BO
430
120
120
80
30
15
35
200
1,800
80
430
120
120
80
30
15
35
200
1,500
80
120
120
80
30
't5
35
300
Hearing
Room
1,500
BO
120
120
200
Net Square Feet 3,510 2,910 2,280 2,020
District Judicial Chambers Judge Master
Judge's Oflice
Master's Office
Judge's Restroom/Closet
Judicial Assistant (incl. reception)
Law Glerk
Copy/Vllork/File
320
80
196
140
150
250
250
Net Square Feet 886 500
Poge 341 of 356

Juslice Court Slondqrds - JudiciqlSet
Litiqation Space Larqe Standard Special
Courtroom
Hearing Room
Vestibule Entry
Jury Suite (w/restroom)
Atty./Client Conf.
VictimAlllitness Waitin g
Holding Gell
Atty./Client Conf. (secure)
Officer Area
Secure Vestibule
Public Waitinq
2,400
80
215
120
120
80
30
15
35
300
1,800
80
215
120
120
80
30
15
35
300
1,500
80
215
120
120
80
30
15
35
300
Net Square Feet 3.395 2,975 2,495
Judge's Office
Judge's Restroom/Closet
Judge's Secretarial Area (lnc. Reception)
Copy/U\lorklFile
Judicial Chambers Judge
320
80
196
60
Net Square Feet 640
Poge 342 of 356

Poge 343 of 356
APPENDIX C

SECURITY SYSTEMS, POLICIES AND
OPERATIONS
Poge 344 of 356

APPENDIX C - SECURIW SYSTEMS. POLICIES AND OPERATIONS
Poge 345 of 356

Poge 346 of 356
APPENDIX D

EXISTING COURTHOUSE SPACE
INVENTORY
Poge 347 of 356

u)
-.
a (t)
C)
c)
.i F
E
=
a -IJo
bo
=
F
tH H
lr q)
(n
IJ
r
r)
c)
.t ;
E
IA
h
G'
tr
J
N
()
L
t
I Q
.F H
u.)
l-rl
tl
o{j
V
Fl
ro
r33UlS 'noqiltvH
r33UrS VUUals'8
Fql
lrJ
rF
o FEeoo
€tr)
F
o
$
o
()
-o_

a 24Jq,
ri
r)
O
H
IA
t*J
h
H
.'t
F (o
J
H
Fi-r
'tr
q)
a
f
o0
m
t33UrS 'f,OgHtVU
lr3uls vuu3ts 's
tt{
ul
E
F
an
F
E
5
o()
t
o
J
lt
F
o
E
-lr
€tr)
(t)
o
s(Y)
a)
o_

-
r) bo
h
F
C)
-
li
o
IJ
>'
u
C)
d)
t-.
l-i
U
tt
II
l_t
ui
4 o2IJa
r)
IJ
f
r)
o
H
a
at
>.
li
6
li
J
E
J
N
6 o
-.F
r
U c)
o
V)
Ft
tleurs nosillvu
["iii
r33UlS VUUilS'S
F
ultl
E
F
o
FE
=o
(,
E
o JII
o
z
o
o lrJ
o
€tr)
c?
o
tr)
c)
0)
o
o_

SE
-C (A
An
FT
6r :-d li
,5:=t
F:E\J()
tr'o.?H
EE E tF s
.EFES! (c!rq-o.=H
E7.i-5+o.
Hntrffintr
UI
{ a-I)g
tflturs nogillvu
r3lruls vuuSts'8
F
tu
tu
G
F
o FG3oC)
E
o J
IL
o
E
E
F
.o
tr)
ts o
()
o
c

a
-
(A
@
4)
4)
6
ul
oa
t
E
,Fi
tl
H
o 2(J{,
Fr o-
(n
- tr
rl
li
H
a
ISEUIS nOgillVU
r33ul9 YUUftS 'S
F
IU
lrl
E
F
o
F
E
I
o()
E
o oJlrEFE
=o
lr
tr)
e{
tr)
cr)
c)
rtl
\J
o_

(A
."1
a
()
()
ra
()
H -d
lsirJ
bl
-
E
|T1
l-.i
-
l-<
c)
(A
r)
-tt
FT
ri
o
'tr a
n
lgtl
F^
6 tr
J
M
>'
q)
H
fi ^
C)
'n
a
tl
I
+
ltJ
s23
EO
o-
6E
*o fJ
ISfUrS nOSN|VU
tStHIS VHHIIS 'S
F
lrl
|r|
E
ta
Fr3
o(,
€ra)
o
tr)
q)
rn
o
o_

APPENDIX E
COST ESTIMATE FOR OPTIONS
CONSIDERED
Poge 3M of 356

Poge 355 of 356

APPENDIX E - COST ESTIMATE
Poge 356 of 356