13.04.2013 Views

School - Bergische Universität Wuppertal

School - Bergische Universität Wuppertal

School - Bergische Universität Wuppertal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48<br />

Quality attack –<br />

Bologna check 2010<br />

The (at times heated) public<br />

discussion of the Bologna reforms<br />

that took place in Germany<br />

last year prompted the<br />

German University Rectors‘<br />

Conference, together with the<br />

Federal Ministry of Education<br />

and Research and NRW’s Ministry<br />

of Innovation, Science,<br />

Research and Technology, to<br />

appeal to the universities to<br />

check conditions in the new<br />

bachelor’s and master’s programs<br />

introduced in conformity<br />

with the Bologna Process.<br />

Supported by the university’s<br />

Quality Network for Study and<br />

Teaching (QSL), UW students<br />

and staff are currently working<br />

on the development and improvement<br />

of bachelor’s degree<br />

programs.<br />

At the beginning of 2010 a<br />

comprehensive survey of<br />

bachelor’s programs at UW<br />

was launched with a view to<br />

determining opportunities for<br />

improvement and implementing<br />

them as soon as possible.<br />

Since fall 2008 the Rector’s<br />

Office has been working intensively<br />

in collaboration with the<br />

7 UW faculties to revise and<br />

renew the university’s quality<br />

control system. The result is<br />

a quality management model<br />

that is decentralized across the<br />

faculties, but whose targets<br />

are defined, their implementation<br />

monitored and effectiveness<br />

evaluated in cooperation<br />

with the central organizational<br />

unit QSL. To further ease the<br />

administrative burden on the<br />

faculties a network of quality<br />

moderators has been established<br />

throughout all university<br />

departments. Faculties may<br />

also call on centrally held student<br />

questionnaires and evaluation<br />

data.<br />

The newly established quality<br />

management model enabled<br />

UW to respond rapidly to pres-<br />

sure from political sources in<br />

the wake of last autumn’s nationwide<br />

student protests. In<br />

fact, only five weeks separated<br />

the memorandum of NRW’s<br />

University Rectors from the<br />

start of the <strong>Wuppertal</strong> Bologna<br />

check.<br />

All seven faculties, with their<br />

more than fifty bachelor’s<br />

programs, set up quality commissions<br />

comprising university<br />

teachers, students and<br />

representatives of the quality<br />

network to evaluate the situation<br />

in open dialogue and<br />

frank communication, and to<br />

propose and document measures<br />

for the development of<br />

the bachelor’s programs and<br />

improvements to the examination<br />

system. The Faculty<br />

Boards and Student Representative<br />

Committees were<br />

then called upon to comment.<br />

Finally, on ‘Study Day‘ in mid<br />

May, an open discussion of the<br />

recommendations took place,<br />

covering all subjects. In line<br />

with the proposals, concrete<br />

changes and improvements<br />

are due to be implemented in<br />

UW bachelor programs by the<br />

beginning of the coming winter<br />

semester.<br />

The Bologna check is a meaningful<br />

instrument of quality<br />

management that has a firm<br />

place in the <strong>Wuppertal</strong> university<br />

scene. Like the quality<br />

management model itself, it<br />

is characteristically decentralized<br />

and relies on consistent<br />

student participation. Specifically<br />

this means comprehensive<br />

course evaluations and<br />

surveys of student opinion<br />

(EVA-Quest), as well as ad hoc<br />

departmental and individual<br />

subject surveys; it also involves<br />

student representation on<br />

relevant commissions, with<br />

the right to comment on proceedings<br />

and participate, via<br />

the relevant student bodies, in<br />

their decisions; and it includes<br />

open public discussion of the<br />

recommendations on Study<br />

Day.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!