22.04.2013 Views

new poetry and poetics edited by brian kim stefans - Arras.net

new poetry and poetics edited by brian kim stefans - Arras.net

new poetry and poetics edited by brian kim stefans - Arras.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BKS: From my various communings either in person or electronically with writers<br />

from Engl<strong>and</strong>, it appears that few are very excited about the alternative <strong>poetry</strong><br />

scene over there, complaining of a lack of discourse, venues for presenting<br />

one’s work or experiencing other’s, <strong>and</strong> the general disinterest in experimental<br />

<strong>poetics</strong>. Tom Raworth is often proposed as the only one from the older generation<br />

worth looking at, a position he has held, it seems, since the early eighties<br />

when he was one of the few English writers American poets found innovative <strong>and</strong><br />

challenging. (J.H Prynne <strong>and</strong> Ian Hamilton Finlay each have their cult audiences,<br />

but neither seems to have gained much of a presence, here). “Conductors<br />

of Chaos” seemed to offer some very “alternative” style <strong>poetics</strong>, <strong>and</strong> to “rediscover”<br />

some lost poets of generations past, but despite the various figures that could<br />

be deemed forebears to a radical contemporary praxis, none seem to spark excitement<br />

in quite the way that the Objectivist poets <strong>and</strong> figures like Jackson Mac<br />

Low or Gertrude Stein, for example, did for the Language Poets. I always wondered<br />

why writers like David Jones <strong>and</strong> Basil Bunting never produced much of<br />

a “lineage” that could extend from their example (very different type of “experimental”<br />

<strong>poetry</strong>, obviously).<br />

Do you feel that, in general, writers of an “alternative” bent in Engl<strong>and</strong> tend not<br />

to affix themselves to “lineages” the way some American poets (addicts) do? Is<br />

the “heroic” aspect of formal discovery <strong>and</strong> thematic innovation just not an element<br />

in English literary culture (perhaps as a reaction to an American ethic<br />

itself)? Do you feel part of a lineage – or, more importantly, do you feel there is<br />

a sense among other poets your age that such an attempt to find something in<br />

English modernism that can be developed – rather than honored yet isolated as<br />

a freak occurrence – is important? Who do you look at in Engl<strong>and</strong> (<strong>and</strong> who do<br />

you wish would just write better)?<br />

MC: I suppose the first thing that comes to mind to say is that, as you know, I<br />

have a fair idea of which English poets (or poets resident in Engl<strong>and</strong>) you are in<br />

touch with, &, well, they simply are writers who, at least as I underst<strong>and</strong> it/them,<br />

have what might best be described as mixed feelings about the current scene here.<br />

A different sampling of poets would paint a very different picture–that things<br />

have never been better, for instance.<br />

I think a sense of lineage of some sort is quite prevalent among some “alterna-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!