Download the document (10.54 MB) - Hillsborough Independent Panel

30 ,
323,
: 19.5m Acom Comp •' ■
• . ‘ 43.2m Acsis! Group .
- 13.2m Alrsprung ' ’
2.511.000 Allied-.lns; . •••;..
. 7,689,000 Aid Restaurants
4.250.000 AmberleyGp
.. >.« ;
i. 3,670,000 A83OC ,Ef^roy .
iramg.
7.795.000 Assoc Niiramg
» 19.0m 'Atlantic Sec ;.
26.0m Atlas .Equipment.
5.096.000 Audlt;Ganera]
; 6,560.000'Automeglc
• 2,153,000 BBB, Design
7.276.000 BCE ■ . “ :
: 16.0m BLP Group .. .
; 4,799,000 BTS;Grp '* .
■: : 17.4m BWOj.- . •
28.4m Beaverco ; ■ *
• 3,000,000 Berford (William)
/.7,867.000 Bensons Crisps -106
: 4,114,000 Berry.'Blrch i Noble 60
■ 135m Better Cons Prods 132
3.583.000 Bllston&Bsttersea. ‘ 85 •
53
.143
96-
347.
'* 17 •
J 1 5 , -•
**■26
. 2 6
: .112 ..
.93 :
102
•330
# .+ 3 :
V -1
• -1 0 •
- 5 :
•' • .- 2 _ ■
+ 2\
• • - 1 0
* +1'j
.. +13
- -7
r - 5
-5
; '. - 1 " '
+2 '
.. .+2.
-1-
e : , ....
4.0 2.8 9.1.
2 .9 ' 3.9 17,0
V ■ '
■2 .0 3.3 15.0
,4.9 ‘ -2.6 15.1 .
','." 1 6 .5
0 . 8 1 . 3 17.8
f6.6 4.7 9.0
■ -5.3' 6 .7 -8 .6 .
2.1. • 3.6 10.6
2.0 3.0 12.1
2.4* 1.9 13.6-
: 6.7 3.4 11.3'
; 5,400,000 Blo lsolates'.,
20.1 m Blmec Inds •
' 4,502.000 Blancherda
5^50,000 Blatdiley M otors'
i : 144,3m-Blenhelm*Exhib
17.1m. Bluebird.Toys ‘
.4,959,000 Border TV - . .
: 39.8m.Bof1and • .
• 15,075,000. Brew m aker .
6,374,000 Br Bloodstock ,
r 20.8m Br; Island
; ’ 15.8m Broad;St'*- ‘
'. 330--;
■ 110;.
230
+5
• + 3 ;
i + 3 >.
+5>.
• +2
• -2 '
. • +1
:+ri
; . r15.
• -IO :
-V »•
r .+ ,a-
• 14.8m CCA Publlcati6ns:
-.3,076.000 C.OS-Gp';-:: • - •
? .26.8m CML Mlcro- :• / .
, • io.3m CPU C om p": r .
; v-'. 24.5m Calm Energy-
-2,649,000 Caledonian
! 26.8m.Campbell & Arm.
16:4m Cap & Regional ;
; • 13.4m Carron Phoenix
•‘3,132,000 C assldy'Bros .
; i’MS.Sm Castle Commr
!••. 11.0m Central Motor. >
r .24.9m .Chelsea Man >•,
< 19,1m Chesiergate Gp 161
i • 11.1m Chieftain Group • -..135
-.7,649.000 C irc a p rin t*:
i •• 24.0m Cltygete. .'
;7,330,000. Citygate CP-
6.772.000 City: ot Lon r ,
’. ,70.4m Cityvision .; . .
; 285m Clarke'Hooper
10.7m Clogau G o l d :
.'33.9m Clun-Resources ;
5.707.000 Coated 0ectrodes
• 0,289.0m Colorgen Inc
; ; 39.6m Colorgraphlc
.* 40.1m Colourvlslon
• • ■ • 15.0m Co of Oeslgners •
•3,723,000 C o m a e - •. ■ • -
■ 34.9m‘Conroy Pet
, ' .12.0m Con's Tem Invs !
•9,829,000 Conti'Microwave -
; 44.3m Cook (DC) • ,
' 15.9m Copymore, •
32.7m-Corporate,P rop: 1
; -23.0m Corton Bch '•
13.6m Cramphom '
5.629.000 Cranbrook' ,
. f5.440.000 Cranswick ' •
.• 4,084,000 Craton Lodge
19.0m.Creighton Labs
58.6m;Crown Com; —
6.257,006 Davies (DYj , • ‘ '
24.1m Dean & Beeves
•4,930,000 Delmar '
.9,030,000, Denmans Elec ’
,60.4m. DeweV Warren
- 31.0m Dolphin Packaging- 161
31.3m oruck J ■ . 498 • .
6.347.000 Ounlon' • . 31
:5,812,000 Dudley Jenkins '- 133
10.5m Durham (DG) - 55
4;771.000 EW Fact ^ / - ' 95 -•
10.1m Eadie • ■ -60
12,3m Econ Forestry - - 88
3.466.000 Edin Oil A Gas - ‘ '2 6 •
•; -40.2m Eldridge'Pope-A ' 208 .
• .27.6m Electron, H o u se' 158 -
.. ;17.6m Epwin ‘ , • .*■ •. •. * ’183 . .
• 21.5m'Eve Group ’ ‘ 229 •
7,381,000. Expedler Leisure : -106 -'
i 27.7m Explaura Hldgs . . ; 39
13.6m Falrtiaven Inti- 1 12'a
. 4,977,000 Fairway London -63
- J .15.6m Farepak 1 • 143
4.229.000 Feedback '. ‘ 50
650,000 Feltrirri Minings • 28
•11.2m Fergabrook’ V/ '1 4 '
-,-11.4m Ferrari . - . , •1 2 I4
, 48.0m Reids (Mra) : 32 ;.
v 10.8m F ilo fax .. 76 •
— ^ Firstland ' r 32
12.5m Flextech" • ' ' \ '5 7 •
' • '43.Bm Flogas , 225
. . 17.5m Floyd Energy V ; “ 193j v
.•;. .,45.1m. Ford, Sellar- 106
< ;li.5 m Forward Gp-- 160
'.'l3.4m :Freem an Gp -. 235 '- .1
,514.7m, French'Conn ^ 93 ' •
f. . 00.0m. Fuller. Smith.-A* ' ;.' 440-
r. 10.2m GWR Gp i • 695
4.250.000 GC nooring ^ 45 :. <
•11.3m'.Gabb)cd‘ • .• •90 •
) '14.1m Gardner (DC) -195 i
9.9B9.000 Gibbon; Lyons. . . 1 6 5 1 •
t :-15.9m Gibbe Mew . '17.5
''6 5 - 3 . 0 12.8
0.8 , 0.6 25.2
5.3 4.5 11.9
4.1 • 7.1,. 9 5
10.3 3.1 20.1
■•3.7' -3.4 13,8 '
. 3.9 1.7,25.1
.6.7 : .4.2 10,0
; ;1.3 1,0 14.4
3 5 ,*• 2 5 10.3
' : 9 ,0 ’ , 3,0 10.4
. 5.0 - T .7 ' .v
1.0 ; 1.1 12.9
• • 1 .3 0 .9 17.0
4.3:-; 2.5 15.4
'. 56.2,'
. . . . e .v .18.6
•’ 7 .6 - 3!0'15,6 ;
- 5.8 2.9 1 7 5
4.7 4.0 12,5
• i v . . y -9.0-
••4.2 - 2.3.12.3 '
4.3 2.3 13.5
3.3 2 5 17.9
,.4 .0 6.1 9,6:'
0.7 -1:0.11.6
•7.5 - 1.6 2 4 5 -
.1 .7 .. 3.017.5
7.4 '9 .3 10.6
• 3.3 • 4.7
■’••7.5 1:818.1 •
• 4.0 v 1.6 23.1;
‘ 6.0 :5.2 20.7
,6.7 ,3.8 15.7
. . 1 4 . 1 :
6 .i: 2.9,.0.4 .
•. • 1 * 5
4*3.. 2 7 28.2 -
0.7: 1.7 15:8 •
,1.3; 4 .2 1 1 .6 .
2.7: ;2.0 19.3 v
1.3e-2.4 i
4 .0 ' 4.2. 9.6. '
2.7 4.5 10:4'
4 ,3 - 4 .9 13:1
.4 ’e , 1 2.'3''17.‘9 '
6,7-1 4 5 12.4 !
614- 5 5 10.2 .
0.7 3.8 13.0-
2.9 '2.7 - .
' 3 .3 ; : 5 5 17.8
. 6.3 - 4:4 11.1
:3.3-. 6.6 16.0
:4.0: 3.8,14.4
4.0‘, 2.5 14.4 •
9.0 - 3,8 10.3 •
• 7 .0 b ‘7.5 ’ 6.1
5.1 1 5 25.1 .
;4 ,0 ‘ 0.6-185 >
2.8 6.2:36.3 ■’
5.3 - 5.4 '6.6 • •
4 : 4 / 2.3‘1 7 .1 --’
6.3 - : 3.6‘14,6 ^
6.3 . 2.2 29.2 ;-
2.3P,” 5.6--9.6
2.9 f,\ V ■ 0.3 :
8.4 • 3.7 15.3
Capnalizalton •
;E . . ' Company .
Pnce Ch’ge Gross Div
.last- o n 1, div Yld
Friday week penca % P/E
; -17.9m Green (Emest) 233 v . -
1.400.000 Greenwfch Comms-- 20 •-,-. ■
■i ; ll.8 m GuIdehouse ” . ' ' 50 ., . .'+ 2
'' • 18.6m Hell's Homes : 177 . • - 3
6 3 3 .0 0 0 Hempden Homecaro 03- r
- . ' ;-12.0m Handley Welker*. -1 9 0 .[
16.0m Hermony L e i s u r e 68 1. - 6 .
. • : .13.1m Hatfield Estetes • ‘175 . , - : . . • '
107.9m Hawthorn Leslie : 5 9 ’ - >
15.3m Headland Gp. . -43 .. •'. .v ;
• 5,078,000 Heavitree ElO'a -J a .
■ 10.5m '. .Do JA' LV. . £10'j + 'a
0,650,000 Hewetsbnv- • ;. ' 120 ' -2
-- -l0.2m .Hey 4 C rott: - 65 •*. : , - 1 ' -
-93.2m.Higtilen'd Pert- .2 5 7 ' - 5 .
•,11;lm Hobson'. •' 3 0 ' -
4.500.000 Hoiders'Tech ‘ ' 150 « - 1 :
0,364.000.Honeysuckle.Gp 103: -2
• 10.0m Homby. • .'- .-199 •• •• - 2 -
• . 32.im Hughes Food - • - 44 • -1 .
• 39.0m Hughes (HT) .• ■ 159 •■• +2
; 0,638,000 HuntJelgh Tech : 102 ;. :+ 7 \
: 4,4g6,6b0 IN STEM “• ' ' 1 0 0 ...............
• 954,000 Imege Storage . 45 ,
• 6,617,000 Imtec1. . v 5'4 : +:u
, , -43.2m Inoco . . - . 3 3'2 : - ‘j '
. 7,737,000 Intereurope..Tech • 146 . - # + 6 '
• . • .45,9m Interlink Express- 283 • - 5 '
; 4,661,000 Inti Medle . i4'a;- -'a
; ., 18.4m Israel (Jack L)-- • •. 22 . , . ;
• .*‘ 'r17.6m jMDlGroup V 41 : \+V
' 31.8m Jacques vert "347 • v .
; 6,900,000 Just R u b b e r - r; . 92., ;•
• 30,0m Kenyon Sdcs' : '--• 15B*'1
15.0m Kewlll:Systems. 253-
- ;-Teknlk. . ---46
'•-7.0 '. 3.0 12.7
;• 1 .9 ‘
‘ 6.0 •
2.7
•‘ 7.2
0 5
4.0.
•0.4.
16.7 •
0.2:
4.3
, 3.0 :
2.7
1.0
, 0.0
7.5'
7.0;
2.0 -
,3 .1
3.0 12.3
4.5'l4;4
3.3 -9.4
3.0 13.4
0 3 01.9
2.3 0,5
0.7 45.0
i ..-•10.0
: 1.0 23.3 -
V. 24.1 •
3.4 15.9.
'4.5'v 6.0
1.1
3.3 11.1
5;3-10.7 1
7.3 7.4
• 3.5 10.9-
4.5 0.0
1.9 39.0-
+ 7 : 3 5 . 3.3 10.3
, ,0.3f 0.9 20.6
■:6.5 5 .7. 16 .5 :
9.9 ; 3.5 12.7
► 0,0' 3.0,19*0
• 7.335,000 Klsrk . . .....
i 8,839,000. Knobs & Knockers M06
; t 64.8m Kunlck.. . -" 56 •
. 6,944^600 .LPAMnd ‘ ‘ '7 9
’ 9,579.000 Laidlaw Thomson ‘ 140
'•1D.6m Lambert v . ’ . -188 ,
•14.5m LBMS PIC ' . a 120 •
. 20,2m 'Lew mar. .’85.
' 11.4m U n c a t- ’ ' 170'
: 6,049,000 Lincoln Hse ! ' 6U
•‘ 11.9m Lodge Care . 174
9,255,000-Lon &.Clydeside 1 0 2 .-
> . -.^S.Om Lon Forfaiting • '.-125-"
6,126,000 Lysander,Pet,' ' ,.2 li
i 9,324,000 MB Cash S Carry : 111
: 17.3m-MMT.Comp - •: 168 ,
17.9m MTL Instruments r . 104 •
.. ; ,13.0m McLaughlin-& Har ‘.'320 ;
.11.5m Magnetic. Materials : 65
-1 0 0 .
50 •
450 '
:20 -
.2 3
72
; ;23'a
•345
:83
383
126
• 171
• 130 •
• 4 1 s
.. 55-.
-218
.513-:
.- .5.230,000 Marnmet ;.
: 7.457,000 Merch.Gp. '
.: ,70.5m Marina Dev. ; -
5 • 197m Marinex ‘
3,554,000 Maxfprlnt
./• • 13.8m Mayborp . : '
; 9,126,000 Memory Comp. . 1
V . 38.Sm Menviar-Swain ...
22.1m M erchantm an? Est
•: ’19.2m Merrydown Wine
.-.:11.1m Metal Bulletin . • v
; :21.0m M etsec - : - •
. 13.2m;Mlcrelec ; .:r-
•:11.1m Mlcrovitec •
; 0,800.000 Midland Scot-Res
,'-1 5 .lm Mill ward Brown
. 31,.7m'Miss-World ,
• -10-
. ,■ ^2 ••.'
■' + 1'-
S ; .
• :+5 :
• +38;
:+2- '
-1 6 :
+ 2 '
• +1 ;
' '—2 * 1
;': - 8 > .
V:'-7 ■
, •:+ 2 ;' '
• - 2 } -
- '2
• r —T •
■. -2
- 2 'r
' • -1 3
• +2-:
- ' + 3 •
• -2
- 2 -
,9.9 ,.*.2:9 12.4
- ; 3 .o ;; 3.3 :14.2
: 9.0 5 7 1415'
; .2.9 ■ 1 ,1 :19.6
••1 .7 , 3.7'11,9‘
2.8 2.6 14,6
. ,1.9 ;. 3:4 1 5 ,7 1
- 3.6 ; 4,6 15.5:
.'-6.8 -4,9 11.1 •
11.3 6.0 V.-
2,4. : a 0 '11.9
3.6.'.: 4 5 10.2
.4.0... 2.4 ‘16.5:
! 3 7 2.1 24.9
•7.6 - 7.5: 9.9;
9 .7 : -7.8 .-7 .9 :
o :... 51.2
:5.9 , 5.3 1 1 .2
■2 .3 - 1.4 16.9
2 .7 ; 2.6 12.1
12.0,' 3.8 .9.0
r 3.9 6.0 39.4'.
.2.3. 2.3 15.0
2.1 f 4 5 - 5:4
:4 .o ; o.9.: . . ‘,
-3
• -1 V
> +1 •
•6.1 7.1 9.5
> 5.9 : 1 > 21*9
4.0 1 4.6 7.7
..8 .0 . 2.1 1 9 5
’ ; 7.1' 5.6 14.1
5.1 3.0 1 1 .8
£ 7 n 2.1 14,9..
: 2.3 5.6 9.0
4 7 2 5 ia!o:-
10.7 2.121.7
: Capitaliution ■
; : i : Company
Prica Ch'oe Gross Div
•la s t ’ on drv. - .Yld : .
Friday wwk pence. .X ' . P/g
; >-75.8m Misys i * • • 402 . /; . : ;5.1 . ,1.3 27.3.
7.390.000 Molinare Visions 27 . - 1 " . .. .....5 7 .4
- • 20,8m M onksr4 Crane . -• 115*'••:-. 4.4 3.8 14.9
• 8,984.000 M oris Ashby -.1 1 0 . V. - 5 : 4.9 4.5 14,0
' 41.5m Mowat , 47 . +1 25.4
, " ' 10.1m. Musterlin , ' 150 - 8 •; 5.3 3.5-125 •
. . . 25.4m New England Props 25'2- ' -'2 0.4 i . 8 ’i9 .6 .
• 300,000 r. Do 10% > ■ £100: -‘ .• -1000 10.0 ,
'45.1m Norfolk House • . 188 . . ; ,4.5 2.4 10.6
2.633.000 Norbeln ? 38 - 2 - - 0.9 2.4 . .
37.9m Nth See & Gen . 43 - • ’ 1.3 3.0 32.6
7.421.000 Northumbrien Fine 81 ‘ ’-';2.7 3.3 11.9 ’
18.5m OIS : 96 • +20 . . .
•2,100,000 Optometries 21 -1 : . • . ; .
,7.012.000 Orchid Tech • 135
■ 15.1m O sborne'& Littie ' 215. -.
•7,633,000 PCT • • , 172 ^ ..■•
10.9m PML 25 — 1 ;
.4,771,000 Pecer Systeme • ' 9 9 . , +2
111.8m Perkwey - 257 -6
.3,939,000 Pathfinders' • 16«2 -1
3,568,000‘Pevion ' ' 5 ’* -+l?j
. ,19.7m Pegasue ; 367
•■ 03.4m Pape Group .. ‘355
: 2,700,000 Perfcom 38
. ; 03.6m Perkins Foods 93
- 10.4m Parsonel Com puter 208
135m Peters (Michael) ■ .100
1.101.000 Petrogen : - ' - S'a
27.4m'PlcadfIly Radio - - 343 .
*• : 3 8 3 m Plct Pet - ' , 104 - r ; .
‘ 5590.000 Plasm ec ' . 115 -3 -
5.177.000 Platon •• • '• 78 • -1 2 '
26.0m Plum Hldgs . 200 •
— - Porth Gp . , ' " . 1 0 8':
5.015.000 Prism Leisure . . 128 •. - 6 .
- - 35,5m Psion • .::- 178 # - 2 •
22,9m Property Trust .' 3 '' '+ V ;
'24,7m‘. Prospective , , 63 , # - 2 '
.. • -17.5m Quarto - :• > 185 ? r +2
' 20.0m Quillgottl '.'.69 : • : - 3
'6 7 0 8 ,0 0 0 'R '4 V Info 75 ' '
• - ' 4B.5m RKF-.‘ •: -126’
. .•10.9m Radio City W ' . 497 +20
: 19.9m Radio Clyde - ' 3 1 6 : ; -4 •
‘ 37.3m Radius ‘ . 138 • - 3 |
5.053.000 Ramco Oil • 3 0 :'. + 3 :
7,972,000-Ram us, ' ; -180.' •
; 156i1m Randsworth - • 272 • • + 4 '-
12.4m Rathbone,Bros •'193
3.430.000 Real Time Control .4 9 - .• •‘-3
. 11.8m. Regina Health ; • 53 - - 2 :
.‘ 11.2m Reliance S ec ,:1 0 9 ''
3.632.000 Reliant Gp -. . ' .41
- l6.Bm Rlva • • - 140 - • ’.:'
2i.0m -R esoft Hotels - 21 ' v , ...
. '• : 23.9m Rockwood ' 92 +1 .
4.371.000 Rolfe 4 Nolan • l 1 68.- ;
.' •-1 6 .6 m -R o sk el-.• . ,! 126 - • -1
6.650.000 Rural Planning ',103 ;. r + 4 -'
: -23.001 SAC . ■ '• '112 ’ -7
9.638.000 SEP Indl • I 29? • -V
2.750.000 SPS Consuttancy 55 -6
3.300.000 Sandell’ -•• , -1 3 2 ; •
-8,517,000 Sanders Sidney' 1 8 3 '. - 2 '
, 19.7m Sanderson Elect. -235 . +15.,
• 70.2m Savage ' 187 # - 3
'. 70.9m Scot Heritable 179 " * - 2
.- 10.8frt Sec Archives • • 173 : .- + 6 ’'
: 305m Select'App: ’ ' 142 . . ' - 9 ' '
: :40.5m Serif Cowells ” ‘ .166 . ' ' ' -1 0 '
. 5.7 ■ 3.3 20.5
- 1 J e 8.8 8.9
4!o 1.6 17.0'
; 0.4 2.4 14.9.
*115 ! 3/115.6
6.7 1.9 15.8-
.." .v e
2.7 2 5 19.7
4.8 2.315.7
.... 5.2 ; .55;.-75
"4*3'i -.1 .*3*48^0
: 5.8 45:11*0
•6.7 35*145
: -. :. 10,2-
;; 6.0 4.8 10,0 '
‘ ,1,6: 0.9,17.0
■Jl’3 2.1 • 55
1 5.5- 3.0 17.5
2.7 3.9'12.3'
:'4‘5- 3*6 13!8.
•8.0 1.6 19.7:
7.7 2.4.195
3 JS- 2.5 10.9
V. . '.•.• ,
.10.0 5.613.5
.; 4 .0 .• ,1.5 ..•
; 6.7 3 5 141
2.7 5.5 13.4
■0 .7 :’ 1.3,20.9.
6.3 5.8 10.1 .
0.7 f. .1:7 33.9
2.7. 1.9 ;;
' 0.3 n 1.4 15.4
1.0 1.1 t4 .9 1
6.1 3 .6 1 3 5 '
; 5.4 : 4.3 13.0
" 2.9 ..’2.6 [15,4
' 5,3-- 4.7 13.6,
!' 1.0b 3.4; 9,6
. . e , . 11.7
• S.9; 4.5 13.1
: 6.4 4.6 17.0
4.01.7 17.3
-4.7 2.5 13.9
8.0 ’4.5 15.1 :
: 5.3 • 3.117.2
3.6: 2.5 15.4 ,
‘.'5 .3 ; ,35-'15.4 :
INVESTMENT TRUSTS
■ Capiialiratiori•••:.•'
■ Company.
. Pnce .Chge Gross 'Div: .
-. last on ' div c..YIdf. .
Friday week: pence .: %: - P/E
‘488.0m Alliance
■ -109.0m Amer Trust •
f. 286.1m Ang 4 O 'seas «... .
i34.7m Bankers ' . . '
-299.5m Br A ssets . .
_ 59.8m Br-Empire S ec .
: ;365.6m Br Inv ‘
. 87.0mBrunnEir.
. ; 62.0m CDFC Tst.
- ; — Do 6H% Ln . v
• ,143.6m Conti 4 Ind • :
• 42.9m Darby Inc ' '
. 23.5m DoiCap-:,-;
179.3m Drayton Cons ‘v
, 110.6m-Draylon Far East
54.6m Dundee. Lori ,
510.8m
• > 87.7m
- 6i:tm ,
— 96.6m
•230.0m
970-' # + 2 ‘ 41.3: 4,3 73.1
- 13234 • + 1 ,2 . 5 5 ','3 .9 33.9
250’2 ^ - 2 ' 3 5 ^ 2 5 56.8
87
. 7 8 :'
' V 45 ' ■
5B6
136:
+ '2
+ 'j
21- 3.1 42.0
‘4.1 • 5.3 26.1
• . . •••..-0.9- 2.0
■ -1 ;r 20.3, 4.5'31.S
-4.1V 3.0 41.7
: 62 -- -1 . 0.9. -1.5 35.6'
. £85'^,yI;.-. . 650 7.6. '
846. • ... 66.7 7.9 15.9.
!
'•• 44.7m
’,176.4m
. 88.2m
9,562,000
'143.1m
BB.Om
.,5 7 .6 m
. 56.0m
1 . ■ 3525m
29.7m
• . '1B9.7m
•292.6m
239.1m
. /69.8m
• 111.6m
’691.0m'
Edinburgh.
■Electric-Gen. >'■
English Int -
English S c o t '.
Ensign •••:;
F -4.C Eurotnjst
F .4 C Pacific
F.4C.Sm aller .
First Charlotte'-
First Scot Amer .
Flemlng'American.
Fleming Claver .
Fleming Enterprise'
Fleming Far East .
Fleming Fledgling
Fleming Japan ■
Fleming Mercantile
Fleming O verseas'
Fleming Tech - .
Fleming' Untversal
For Coi:'•97
.296
;121 •:
' '..02<
’• • 279 ’
• 166 ■
- 7 6'j
. 1234
452
130
288
140--
233
237
• 247 ,
202’j
,180 •
.177
:171
131*2
: + i "
+ 2
:,:.-2 '. 15.8 ” 9.1-.14.6
.17.6 3.4’’4 i >
2.8- .0.7
+ 1 . 11.7 3.6 36.0
7 5 b 4 0 43.9
-1 ,. 2.5 ' 2.6 54;8
+ 3 6.6 b 2.2 62.7
, +1*. • 3.3 2.7 59.6
• : .1 .6 2.0 59.0
: Capitaliialfon:
. E. 7 . Company.:
..Price Ch*g«- Gross Oiv :•'
last-. ; on ...div ; . Yld • ' .
Friday.-wwlc, pwee; P/E'
•', 78.0m Law D ebenture - 344
, 51.3m Lon Amar Ventures 56
•181.3m Lon Merchant S ec 112
+ 8 ‘. ■••2.7 .
. .; -1.6
i, :1.6.
.. 0.1
1 - 2 22.4
+2'a • 1.6.
r 2 ” •
-2 '
: -1
9.7
3.2
1.2
3.5-
: ... 0.9
• -1'*" :e.3
• + 2 V -4.3
+2 2.0
■ +2'7ze
• +1'2 . 3.0
• '■ '2
. • - 2 .
,,.-1 .
; +1 '
1 +2*2 ,
v- '+3 .'"
= +3
a +7 ,
1.0 . .
1:0
2 .t 59.0
0.8 ,..•-
5!0 26.5
>1.2
.. 3.4 35.3
■ 2.3 74.5
0.5 •
.1.5 64.4
0.4 33.7
3.1 42.1
2.4 6 8 5
1.1 .
1.6 79.9
2.3 57.9
; 104.1m GT Japan . .,334
• 19.9m G eneral,Cons Cap 110 '
. 43.4m : .Oo Inc 120: .
877.6m Globe (aa) ': 165 ‘
• 115.0m Govett Atlantlc 142
339.6m Govett Oriental' 378 ?
250.3m Govett-Stralegy . ' 255'. •
•;38.3m Greenfrlar 2 8 5 -
? ^O.lm Gre3ham House • '475 -
:15B.2m Hambros ; r; S i296-.:- ; -+ i ,"• '7 .3 : 2 .5 ‘52.1'-
• •: 53.9m Independent Inv Co !5B ' - + ’< •' :0.3 ; 0.5
. 24B.6m Iny.'Cap ; • V 402 • ■ - 1 - 20.7 5,1 26.7
il4 ;2 m Kleinwori C harter>’.141-: -v -.'4 ••• 4.3 j 3.0 38^0
116.7m Kleinwort O ’se a s 145Y . • + 4 '- •-; 3 ,6 2 .5 ,5 1 .4
, , 23.3m Klejnwort SmallerTj:.177r,-';« ^ . , ;- 4 ,9 . Z B 4 7 5
10.3b
6.2
4.0b.
1.9
5.7
3.9
8.7
& 34,6
42.4;
6*1.0
78.1
52.4
. •177.7m'Merchants' . 1:
,1.597.4m Merrill Lynch
r .197.8fh Monks'Inv Tst :
• :170,3m Murray Income
•242.1m Murray Inti
. ...106.0m Murray Small
1.' 68.3m Murray Venture
• 425m Nwthrog Inc 83 ••
• 66.8m New Tokyo .
10.9m Nth Sea A ssets :
^ 142.5m Nthn Amer
.... . 76.7m O ’se a s inv Tst
. 25.2m Pacific Assets
• - 25.Bm Panslda Gp
. .7,540.000. Personal A ssets •
187.2m
: 22,3m'
-1,475.7m
•. 72.3m
; • 99.8m
r' 368.5m
: 230.3m
: 327.3m
V 14.4m.
•- 436.4m
1647m
190.5m
-•:.•' 25.3m
. ':-S4.6m
83.1m.
: 45.5m
• 37.5m
.-1673m
51.9m
• 149.6m
27.2m
257.4m
135.1m
: 243.6m
• ;. 12.9m
107.6m'.
22.8m-
49^4'm'
r 12.9m
■ .22.8m
173?4
£16V
•255 •
. 206
206
191 .
328
•108 ;
. 152’
- 26 '
425 :
’ 205 ’
•210
.60
• 50'a
1. 113'2
74
“ 289 .
281
-£17’a.
St Andrew Inv Tst' 210'2.
Schroder Global 277
Scottish'. •:.
Scot American
■Scot Eastern •
Scot Merc ‘A*
Scot Mtge •< ••
Second Alliance
Secs Tst of Scotlridl19
Selcective Asset - • 8712
Smaller Cps I3 9 t.
Sphere Inv • • 70
Steel B urrill;. . 230 /
7T?-Australia :•' :-'122 !'
TR'Clty Of.Lon pfd 87»2-
• +1 - 13.6 4.0 2B .2:
• +1 • • 0.6- 1.1 98.2
•..+9 --^O ,j3.6;-1B.8
• -1 U .: ,8.0 - 5.i'2 5 .4
RIT Cbp Prtnrs
River 4:M erc
Robeco
Rolirico V "1 ■
Rorento • , '
• -2 »2
: +1- ■
• -1 .,
• -7 r
+ 1 *2
+ 4-;'
+ >2 '
• +4 ,
-10 \
+ l . 'r
v-'Vr
-1
-+ i
+3
; 4.4 1.7.78.0
.10.8 5.2.28.6
9.3 4.5 25.5
'2.8 -1.5 86.4
,6 .6 . 2.6 51.5
7.7 -7.1 18.2
0.3 e 0.2. . .
8.3 "2.b'6i*6
, 2.5 1 5 - - : .•
1.1- .0.5
:3.0 5.0 13.4 ‘
. 1:3 2.6 44.7','
1.2 ,.l 'l .r . . :
•-145
.1 0 3
155
90
• 1 2 1 *
858
• + ' 2 -
• +V-
• +1'2
• +1-
-1
:.+ 1 ’
. •' +4 .'
. i+ ' j :
: ’ '+V *'
..••+3".
• +7
6.7 :
• 6.1
. 4.3 •'
.3.4 •
• 4.0 •
6 .1 : •
•3.2b
32.0
5.9b
0.7 '
•3 .0
2.8
13.3
3.2 39,6
2.2 55.2.
3.0 45.7
3.3 36.7
2.6 49.2
6.8-19.9:
2.6 48.6
3.7 36.6
5.0 31.9 .
0.8 57.6:,
2 5 93.9 -•
4,a 56.0
5.619.7
TR. Pacific
TR'Property , . '
TR Tech'Inv.
TR-^Trustees - .
•Temple Bar •.
Throgmorton
Throg Dual "
Tribune! . ..
TriplBvest Inc .’” •
USDC: Investment-
Value Inc T st'
Viking R esources.’
. ••129.2mlWestpbol . V ••
>346.2m,Whitbread Inv *
. ,: 452.6m .^itanj-.t .
7712
57^4
•: 75
. .144*2
236
435 •
370
210
•\:95; •.
i35
• 64 ’ •;
,.5 7 ...
f 131 -
552. r
:.'132’2 .
+ 2 ., 4.7b 3,9 39.6 -
+'2 ;. . 4.1 ■,-4.7:32,9
+ 2 V .0,3 - 0,4 22.1
-'2 1.2. '2.T 55.5 .
.1.9 .2.5; . . -
3.3 -2.3,79.4
.11.3 4.6 24.8 '
- 6 17.7 . 4.1 :>
+10 ^-V.‘ ... .: .,.••'
•5.3 2.5 43.5
; 23.5 2 4 7 5.4
+2
+1
,+ 1
• +1
. +1
-1
. .4.7:: 3.5 34.2 =
- 2.1-;' 3.3 35.2 •
2.7 . 4.7 24.9.,
'■ 2.4 - ;1.8'44.4
’ 12.6 2.3 5B .6'
. : ;3 7 - ."2.8-46.B,.
Capitalizalion • ’
• •• - • E : 1' .Company.:
Price Ch'ge
last on
: . Friday week
Gross'-
div •
pence '
.Div
Yld i '
% , ' p/e
H .3m Savartiald-RMve ‘ ' 119 : -1 3.7 3.1 12.8
•14.7m Sherp 4" Law . ! 85 '-.,:;+ 2 4.2 4.9 22.4
’ 4,242,000 Sheldon Jones 82 V 6.2 7.6 13.4
2,400,000 Shelton (Martin): • ‘ •
. 0,210.000 Sheriff HldflS . s •
. 40 / 2.7 5.5 "9.9
150 . 7.0 4:4 12.7 .
• .0,181,000 Sherwood Comp >,120 : -+1 6.0 ■5.0 5.4
58.7m Sherwood Group 365 r - 7 7.3 2.0 .9.8 ^
: '5,513,000 Shorco : '225 • -17- 6.0: 2.7 12,4
•. 51.1m Sims Food 239 .’ 9.9 4.2 14.7
. 5,900,000 Soundtracks 59 . - ■- 2 ' . 2.9 5.0 10.9
108.0m Sthn Bus ' 471 '• ’ -1 8.0 1.7 11.9
5,391,000 SW .Resources . . 11'a ; + 'j • 13.9'
v 43.5m Spendex • 415 * 5.7': 1.4 16.9
. 8,604,000 Spedeleyas -59 •. +1 1.3 22 14.2
' '5,709.000 Spectrum . •33"; - -1 ' .-, •. 25.6
9,338.000 Spice •. • 60_. r - 3 3.8 6 ^ -
• ' 10.4 m S pie sh 61 • +1 3 . 6 ' 5.9 10.0
; 4,641,000 Stelnless Metal ' ,01 +3 1 2.7 3.3
, 2& im Stenco Exhlb 30 • -1 0.4 1.1 20.7-
376.9m Stenhope Props 227 ;-*-6 ■ . 0.1 '21.0
26.Bm Sterling.Pub * 136 ,; * 4.4 •" .3.2 102
- ' : 10.5m Sunlelgh B e rt m
. -11.1m SunsaT& Vine . : • . P6 • • - 22 2.6 10.1
240
222m Sutheriehd 01 ; -1 22 ‘ 2.7 32.0 '
-1 0 .2 m .S y n e p se Comp
; 5,220,000TDS Circuits'*
290
• 58
•• + 1 -
* -1
4.5 - 1.6 13.6
• , 22£m TMD A dvert. ' 252 4.0 1.6 19.2
. 32.7m .TSB Chen Islends.- .2 2 3 - .'+25 6.1 x 2.7 11.2 ;
• 131.2m TV*am • 201 • +1 6.7 . 3.3 13.3 '
• . 4,427i000 Telecomputing -,
• 3,800,000 Telford Gp
93 : -5 0.9 . .1.0 ■ ’
12 r •' , . " • ' - ■ "
; 11,5m Thornton GW 177 -3 • 5.7 3.2 13.4;
9,810.000 Thorpec ' • i 45 -1 : *1.6 3.6.
• 7,920,000 Tinsley,(Eliza) ....... 110 2 ,-- 6.1 •5.5 11,6
.7,451,000 Tilon- 77 3.0 3.9 •
7,451,000 Tore* Hire -. 77 • - .; i 3.0 3.9
• ‘5,300,000 Total Systems 53 1.0e 1.9 9.9
, -7.762,000 Transrap Hldgs - -71 •. • 2.0 2.B 16.0
33.5m Tranwood ; 3 4 'a . : -1 - 4.0 11.6 10.B
B3^m Trencherwood ’333 . • +10 6.8 1 2.0 -9.0
11.1m Trevlan H ldgs-. 121 . +14 4.0b 3.3 11.6
29,7m Trillon-• 51 . -r2 « • "• 7 ‘
. 10.2m Tubular Exhib ; 2 2 'j ■ : 0*4- 1.6 12.7
• • 3;466,000 Tudor • 140 + 2 0 ’' 8.0 5.7 8.5
, •7,745,000 UCL Group 85•.- •“ '-3- •• •5.3 • 6.2 7.1.
2,611,000 UHS Inti •.-' -16^' ' -1 . ’ ;’.i
'. 30.9m UTC Group •
1105m Utd Frlendy .
203 • -2 ; 13*3 6.5 6.8
708 35.5 5.0 .
• -7,961;000 Usher (Frank)
• : 14.6m Venture Plant -
115 . - l ! : ' B.O 7.0 6.9 •
115 - -3 • 4.3 : 3.7 13.9.
0,566,000 VkJeo Tape Rec 124 • - 3 • . 3.3. 2.7 13.8..
• • 22.0m Vlstec . . . 23 . -2 ' '•
5,752,000 WSP HIdgs: . " '
. - ; 10.4m Wardell Roberts
89 ' • / • ■ 2.8 , •3*1‘13.5
65 ••■•'" *-3''
' 6,824,000 Walpac 26 0 7 . 2 7 10.8 •
' 6,038.000 W entworth- -48 ' . - 2 . .. : 2.5a 5.2 12.8
■5,320,000 iWhlnney M ackay' '
; 9.417,000 William (Rex) Hldos
6,395,000 Wood John D & Cc
100 , ‘ . - 2 ' • • 5 .7 : 5 7 12.3
$8. . —1 * 0.7 •1.8 34.2
i 63 5.3. 6.4 6.6
. I1.3m-Wld of Leather - . 140; Mr7. - . : ,6.0 4.3.-6.3
18.1m Wyevale • 302 ' • -3 ' • 6.0 2.0 :19.0 ;
14.4m Wyko ' 82 -• ' :-1\ 3.9 • 4.8 13.3
4,773,000 Yelverton . ' 41 ' , r - 1 . 0.7 ' 1.7
-42.6m York T st Gp ‘ 48 v +2 3.4 -• 7.1 5.2
. 21.9m Young Group , .
31.4m Zurich Group
235 ' 4.3 :1.8 11.7
: 3 2 . • 2.7 ‘ 8.4
• Ex. dividend a E x all b Forecast dividend e Interim
payment-passed f Price at;suspensl0 n gDividendand
yield ekclude;a special payment k Pre-merger ligures n .
Forecast earnings o Ex other!r Ex rights s Ex scrip or •
share split t Tax-free . . No’significant data.
THIRD MARKET
‘ Capitalization ..••• v '^.
, £ .:•■ .Company , .
. Price
last
;. Friday
.Ch'ge
. on •
•week
Gross
.div
pence •'
Oiv
Yld
; P/E
• 2.271,000 ASB Barnett ; . -7 9
2,288,000 Amercoeur • ' -' 12 -• - 2 ’
2.038,000 Andaman :Res -70 , - 1 . : ) •
1.544,000 Ass Farmers : . 76.
23.9m Beckenham 113 '■- 2 3,3 2.9 14.6
. 6,810,000 Broadcast 192 +1 - 20.7
•4,180,000’Casperi Oil ’
•• 1,344,000 Chelsea:Art •> •'
• 18*2
70 . - ’5 ,'.:tO 1;4 8.3'
. 2,571,000 Chemex Inti ;• 48 - . 1
2,208,000 Crown Eye \ .130 , 15.9
4,190.000 Eglihgton
•;. - 13.2m Far E Res . .
65 -3 36.1
.5 6 +1
-2.356.000 HlfcJare , 85 . +2 14.2
16.0m Honorbilt. 27 . +4 ; 13.8
' 2,159,000
'1.945,000
4.356.000
- • 51.3m
4.372.000
40.9m
0.115.0m
’ 1,043,000
.2,519,000
: 7,798,000,
7.089.000
. 41.4m
Inti Comms
& < PE)
Leading U r
lynx Group .
. Medlrace '
Norton Gp
Pennine Optical ‘
Rentamlnster •
Royal Sovereign
Seacon • ■• '
Takarer
^4,800,000 U PLr- •’
-. 6,977,000" Unit; Group .:
-\ 13. :
43.-
. 98
• 89 :
;17'•'••
193 *
10*2
:*;35•'
•02 .
—185,:
123 .
-475-
110
: 135
.-5'
-1 ,
-1*
» -5
+5
2.0 4.7,16.3
20,9 :
2.7 3.0 15.0
•• I r '6 . 2
:..V 7.1
• 2 .7 .; 4.4
r 7.3.- 3.9 .11.1
3.3 '2 .7 7.8
• 1.3 0.3 41.9
3.2 2.9 14.7
6.7 . 5.0. 7,7
GOLD
B U LLIO N :
Open: S389.25-3B9.75 Close: $387.00-387.50
High: $369.25-389.75 Low: $385.50-366.00.
C O IN S : . ■; P e r c o i n (E x V A T)
Britannia:$39B.00-)03.00(£234.00-237.00)
Krugerrand: $386.00-369.00 (£227.00-229.00) ; v
................ " 1 -2 3 7 .0 0 )':-
-----0 (E234.00-237.0D)
New Sovereigns: $91.00-92:00 (£53.50-54.25)': ’:
Mapleleal (/1oz): $398.00-403.00 (£234.00-
American Eagles: $398.00-403,00 (£234.00
New Sovereigns: $91.00-92:00 (£53.50-54.!-.
Old Sovereigns: $91.00-92.00 (£53.50-54.25
Platinum: $551.25 (£325.05)
Palladium: $179115 (£105.65
i Sliver: $5.85-5.87 (£3.440-3.455)
House of Lords Law Report April 17 1989
Revenue loses ‘preposterous’ company tax case
€ollard (Inspector of Taxes) v
Mining and Industrial liold-
’ ingsLtd
. Before Lord Bridge of Harwich;
Lord Brandon of Oakbrook,
Lord Oliver of Aylmertbn, Lord
Jauncey ' of Tullichettle and
.. Lord Lowry ’■ ■ .. ,.. ■ ",
[Speeches April 13]
Parliament in drafting .the pror
visions: for. the interaction of
consideration of the interrela­
tion of some very ; complex
statutory provisions. v ::: >■
i It was agreed that the statu- ’
tory proyjsions';, enabled the
before Mr Justice Walton-the quite the opposite conclusion to
: Grown had argued that the word that.: contended for by the'
“may” in section I00(6)(b) Crown.
meant.“shall”. That coritention ; ' They ; pointed, Mr Park
had been -rejected and the submitted, strongly to the
million during that period.1
However, it had not! allocated'
the SCT to the cofporation ta x :
attributed to its items of income ;
pursuant, to the provisions of ,
section 100(6) of the Finance laxpayer company’s' ACT to be Crown ‘ had ' exprcssly aban- conclusion that in" making the
Act 1972. . ! set off at least to some extent, doned it before the Court of necessary tax computations, the
. .It claimed that in computing against itscorporation tax liabil- Appeal and the House. deduction o f DTR was intended
its corporation tax liability, . ity. The question, posed.was, the ;The Crown’s c a s e n o w w a s to precedethe set-off of ACT.,
notwithstanding the provisions. way. in which that should:be.' th a t:reading section 100 as a ! The- Court of Abneai had
of sections 501 and 505 o f the: done. :. •' , ' .: r whole, there could :be discerned rejected that argument in setting
Income_and Corporation Taxes The taxpayer, com pany’s a necessary!implication o fa pro - " • - ®
Court of Appeal
right to appear
out- its conclusion !(see. [1988J :
double taxation relief :(DTR) ! A ct'1970 and-section 85(1) of: /contention that fin calcualtirig fata allocation arid freduction; SJC 15 24) But there: were
and' advance: corporation tax the Finance Act 1972, credit was the amount available for set-ofT anrlounting, in effect^ to an parts
(ACT)'intended that a company first to be given for DTR and ' there should first: be deducted expressenactment to that effect.
•in Computing the amount-of its;, ACT was then to be set against : fromnhe control.dividends and ; Alternatively,' it : was-.said,
corporation tax liability could its remaining corporation tax’, non-control:dividends the!DTR section 100(6) was clearly
make'deduction for DTR before: liability. ; attributable to.'them result'ed iri framed on;the''ahuthpti6n: There was no justification for -
imposing in . the absence of
Printout admissible as ietidence
. compelling :stafutory words an
additional tax burden on a
piirported- to replace the Iim ita-: receipts were invariably issued ;:SP failed to conform with the It had to be, right that in
tion provisions thereunder, it instead of b ills'o f ladirig by section l(6)(b) requirements. / enacting section . I (6)(b); the . ... ......
' was-.nipt invalidated by* the English cross-Charine 1 op- ; Thepurpose ofthesubsection -^g^lature: - .did not intend :to ,. company sin^ply because it had
provisions of the Act- : - ..erators. was to confer on a voiiintai^ ^pyGn^de;thp-agreeiTierit;.of;the: niade. distributions on w hichit
The limitation , of Iiabiiitv . ! th e narties’ contmrt Pv. contractual tie a statutoiV bind- . Pa«ies whren uthe parties to d had paid tax in advance.
; provision' in the rules referred idericed by a* non-nego’tiable ; Inf t th" rf6r to ^nco:I:i>or^te^he, rule? was^conlended for by
only .to . th e;, misconduct- or receipt :note, purported to re- ^^Vshipowners, if they, were; jn *heircontrI?t •--■.'••: the? Crown was that because it
recklessness bf the earner him- place the limitation provisions ? ?tr?n? enough bargaining pos-: „ * rtjHe i v ’ riilp S ' .1, . had;, m ^ e .a; distribution and
self.or to hjs .‘‘alter ego” and did : under article IV, rule 5(e) of the : Hnoiip.Vitliv ’r . . 1pc;co* paid that; sum in advance^ the
not include the reckless acts or Hague-Visby Rules. The plain- H 0J rules i>y issuing a
omissions of , the servants or tiffs contended'that the defen- ' [*otlc? to shippers thatTio billsof
agents of the carrier. dants could,- not limit their !adlng 'v ?u,tl be issued by them
Mr Justice Steyn so held in . liability as the rules had statu.-.- T h ?s’eVdori;l(6)(^) words^^^“as; ! ‘'act or oriiissiori'of the carrier rnTrh,cinnSiho| Unrea.SOnab'e i3
the Commercial Court of the tory force m relauon to the ,-f ^ kjii done with inlent tb ran«r-Ham. ' conclusion; that most; compul.
v Queen’s Bench Division in a- .contract. . ; , ..
reserved judgment .when allow- ; Section
..................................... - e taxpayer .cbrnpany1 Isufiered
tiffs cbntended' th a t the ^efen- " 0110? *” ^ 1^ ^ 1^ 11^3*11” *5'*150^ : - ■ ^ ^ - additional corporation tax to the
uiis Lonienuep inai. xne aeien-, H.n- , . |ri h„ . vis.nnc The . -
mg: a ! claim , ’.by Vthe1 plaintiff
freight hauliers. Browner Inter-,
national Transport Ltd, against
the defendants, ' Monarch SS-
Company Ltd, owners of the
i 'J - !.'.rv;:'
^isions.^The received view that . tune of £254.137
the word/carrier-.^in:the p h r a s e •'.■
___________ . xw/ _ ‘‘act or-bmissipri'vof the carrier
if^^ the ’r ^ S p t l w ^ a - b i i i , :b f .done ^ ith iijte rirtb ^ u se ^ sive statutbrv'^rovision wbiild
• lading” were not included in the; ?ee> ;or, -recklessly/, arid with
l(6)(b) of the 1971 receipt. Section’ l(6)(b) con- 'knowledge^^that^damage would
idenced as a; contract for .the
carriage of goods at sea, ex-
Act prbvided that, the rules had . ferred on a voluntary contrac- Probably result” was correct arid
,the force of law in relation to tual tie the statutory force. only the narrow' view o f its iriter-
any non-negotiable receipt ev- if its formal. requirements were pretation had to prevail..
fuIfilled. The receipt failed to Solicitors: Clyde & Co; 'Da-
cpmjjly'with section l(6)(b). vies Arnold & Cooper..
be required : before reaching it.
There was certainly none in the,
case and the appeal !:should be
dismissed. '-!’.-.’!
,; Solicitors: Solicitor of Inland
Revenue; :Frcshfields.
Garner v DPP '
Before Lord Justice Stocker and
Mr'Justice Roch ’ :
[Judgment April 14]
A printout that-.was a product of
a mechanical device was admis­
sible at corririibn law; as being
real' evidence arid .was 'riot, for
, the purposes of section 6 of the
Road Traffic Act 1972, as
substituted in .Schedule 8 to the
Transport Act 1.981; dependent:
upon; section; 10(3) of that A ct.' :
The justices, on a hearing
upon a charge of driving with an!
excess ' of alcohol - in thb
accused’s- breath.werecorrect in
admitting, in evidience the print­
out even though it had not Wen.
signed by the officer/ who had
carried out the test. .:v.,;
, Lord Justide Stocker so held
in'the Queen’s Bench Divisional
Court when dismissing the.ap- '
pealofW illiam G arnerbrought
by way bf case; stated' frorri the
determination of the Greenwich -
Jusuees on March 21, 1988 that
the omission of a signature on
the copy of the printout pro­
duced by the Lion Intoximeter'
3000 did not affect its admis­
sibility and nothing under sec­
tion 10(3) of. the 1972 , Act
prevented a police officer from;
giving .oral evidence of • the
results of the breath tests. Mr
Gamer also appealed against his
conviction. v
Mr! Robin : Griffiths for Mr
Gamer; Mr'Jeremy Carter-Man­
ning for the DPP/
' LORD JUSTICE STOCKER
said that ’.folio wing earlier, prac­
tice directions at Divisional :
Court hearings bf such cases as
this the printout from a Lion :.
Intoximeter should be available '
in evidence. . ’
The: driver had provided two .
specimens bf breath and calibra­
tion- checks upon the Lion
Intoxim eter rriachine ■ 'had
shovyri that , it ; was working
correctly. :
’ The printout showing the
results of those tests was not
signed by the police officer in •
charge bf the tests but had been:
signed; twice by the driver. .'.
It was contended by the driver
that th e; admissibility of: the
printout depended upon section
10(3) of the 1972 Act, as
substituted. Section 10(3) !:was ,
related to and confined t o ,
prosecutions under sections 5
, and 6 of that Act. . : •
; A priritout as a product of a ;
riiechariical device fell - within1
the category of real evidence and
was not dependent upon section.
10(3). Th’e.purpose.and effect. of
section 10 was to permit an
Iritoximeter printout; to be ten-.
dered at a section 5. br 6 hearing :
without the necessity of anyone,
being; called to. prove that
document. -
Mr Justice Roch agreed.
: Solicitors: Donnelly & F.lliott.
Gosport; CPS, Inner London.
It,