25.04.2013 Views

9HMKJM - The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online

9HMKJM - The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online

9HMKJM - The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EVOLUTION AND THEOLOGY. 953<br />

was submitted for and received one <strong>of</strong> the Actonian<br />

prizes recently awarded by the Royal Institution <strong>of</strong><br />

Great Britain. TTe gather that the staple <strong>of</strong> a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> it is worked up anew from some earlier discourses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the author upon " Genesis and Geology," " Science<br />

and Scripture not antagonistic," etc.<br />

In coupling with it a chapter <strong>of</strong> the second volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dr. Hodge's " Systematic <strong>The</strong>ology (Part II., An-<br />

thropology)," we call attention to a recent essay, by<br />

an able and veteran writer, on the other side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

question. As the two fairly enough represent the extremes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Christian thought upon the subject, it is<br />

convenient to review them in connection. <strong>The</strong>olo-<br />

gians have a short and easy, if not wholly satisfactory,<br />

way <strong>of</strong> refuting scientific doctrines which they object<br />

to, by pitting the authority or opinion <strong>of</strong> one savant<br />

against another. Already, amid the currents and eddies<br />

<strong>of</strong> modern opinion, the savants may enjoy the<br />

same advantage at the expense <strong>of</strong> the divines—we<br />

mean, <strong>of</strong> course, on the scientific arena; for the mutual<br />

refutation <strong>of</strong> conflicting theologians on their own<br />

ground is no novelty. It is not by way <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset, however,<br />

that these divergent or contradictory views are<br />

here referred to, but only as an illustration <strong>of</strong> the fact<br />

that the divines are by no means all arrayed upon one<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the question in hand.<br />

present<br />

And indeed, in the<br />

transition period, until some one goes much<br />

deeper into the heart <strong>of</strong> the subject, as respects the relations<br />

<strong>of</strong> modern science to the foundations <strong>of</strong> relig-<br />

ious belief, than either <strong>of</strong> these writers has done, it is<br />

as well that the weight <strong>of</strong> opinion should be distrib-<br />

uted, even if only according to prepossessions, rather

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!