- Page 1 and 2: XIV Summer Academy Challenges of Su
- Page 3 and 4: Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Authors Challen
- Page 5 and 6: 4.3.2 Transportation ..............
- Page 7 and 8: CHAPTER 9 Innovations .............
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgements The participants o
- Page 11 and 12: Indicators The most important aspec
- Page 13 and 14: Over the years, the green areas in
- Page 15 and 16: Table 1.3 Good Practices in Lodz Ty
- Page 17 and 18: PARTICIPATION Mud Festival - Inform
- Page 19 and 20: Eco-Piotrkowska - The Longest Green
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 2 Project Description Local
- Page 23 and 24: The main objectives of the European
- Page 25: The goal of this research project w
- Page 29 and 30: should be some legal regulations th
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 4 Good Practices of Ecosyst
- Page 33 and 34: positive outcomes in such cities as
- Page 35 and 36: 4.4.1 Revitalization of Urban Areas
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 5 Valuation of Ecosystem Se
- Page 39 and 40: espondents to express their willing
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 5.1 Socio-economic Character
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER 6 Stakeholders Analysis A b
- Page 45 and 46: Examples of stakeholders from this
- Page 47 and 48: - science clusters in Lodz - they i
- Page 49 and 50: international companies and investo
- Page 51 and 52: they can derive from greenery. More
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 7 Indicators and Trends of
- Page 55 and 56: eing modified. Future trends could
- Page 57 and 58: decreasing over the past 10 years.
- Page 59 and 60: The stakeholders had difficulties t
- Page 61 and 62: 7.5.2 Accessibility to Different Ar
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 8 Systems Thinking Approach
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 8.1 Causal Loop Diagram - Co
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 8.2 Causal Loop Diagram - La
- Page 69 and 70: greenery because they do not percei
- Page 71 and 72: 8.5 Well-being Section The problem
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 9 Innovations The system ma
- Page 75 and 76: 9.1.2 Competitive Greenery Policy I
- Page 77 and 78:
9.2.2 Comprehensive Vision and Iden
- Page 79 and 80:
communities with its services. More
- Page 81 and 82:
According to the project, the exist
- Page 83 and 84:
CHAPTER 10 Final Conclusions This r
- Page 85 and 86:
Bibliography AtKisson, A. (1999). B
- Page 87 and 88:
APPENDICES Appendix 1 List of stake
- Page 89 and 90:
- Department of Urban Planning and
- Page 91 and 92:
Appendix 3 Stakeholders’ Contact
- Page 93 and 94:
COHABITAT Group tel.: 889-907-710 l
- Page 95 and 96:
Amoeba "Amoeba" is the classic and
- Page 97 and 98:
J Eco-innovations and „green” w
- Page 99 and 100:
No. Best Practice European Green Ca
- Page 101 and 102:
Best Practice 2. Eco-Roof Incentive
- Page 103 and 104:
Best Practice 4. Hammarby Sjöstad
- Page 105 and 106:
Best Practice 6. Ørestad Urban Gar
- Page 107 and 108:
Best Practice 8. Green Stormwater I
- Page 109 and 110:
Best Practice 10. Bristol's Parks a
- Page 111 and 112:
Best Practice 12. Urban Tree Progra
- Page 113 and 114:
Best Practice 14. McGill University
- Page 115 and 116:
Best Practice 16. Warsaw University
- Page 117 and 118:
Best Practice 18. Emscher Park Rest
- Page 119 and 120:
Best Practice 20. Rotterdam Green R
- Page 121 and 122:
Best Practice 22. Master Composter
- Page 123 and 124:
Best Practice 24. Vertical Farming,
- Page 125 and 126:
Best Practice 26. NeighborSpace Pro
- Page 127 and 128:
Best Practice 28. Melbourne Water's
- Page 129 and 130:
Best Practice 30. Shanghai Houtan P
- Page 131 and 132:
Best Practice 32. Integrated Resour
- Page 133 and 134:
Best Practice 33. Forest for Peterb
- Page 135 and 136:
- Greek Values. Stormwater Manageme
- Page 137 and 138:
Best Practice 36. Chicago’s Green
- Page 139 and 140:
Best Practice 38. Invasión Verde C
- Page 141 and 142:
Best Practice 40. Plant-A-Tree Prog
- Page 143 and 144:
Best Practice 42.SsolarCity Linz-Pi
- Page 145 and 146:
Best Practice 44. Grants Program fo
- Page 147 and 148:
Best Practice 46. The "Green Belt"
- Page 149 and 150:
Best Practice 48. Münster - the Ec
- Page 151:
Participants of the XIV Summer Acad