27.04.2013 Views

Guía para el uso de datos de audiencia Nielsen IBOPE México

Guía para el uso de datos de audiencia Nielsen IBOPE México

Guía para el uso de datos de audiencia Nielsen IBOPE México

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Guía</strong> <strong>para</strong> <strong>el</strong> <strong>uso</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>datos</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>audiencia</strong><br />

Research Group have commissioned, outsi<strong>de</strong> BARB, periodic two-week paper diary studies using diary<br />

formats not unlike those used for much radio research. Some of this work is <strong>de</strong>scribed in a later section.<br />

This kind of situation is lik<strong>el</strong>y to increase for the future.<br />

Most regional t<strong>el</strong>evision structures end up with regions that vary in size. This often means that the smaller<br />

stations would not have an a<strong>de</strong>quate sample based upon proportionate regional sampling. The solution is<br />

usually disproportionate geographical sampling or a fe<strong>de</strong>ration of regional pan<strong>el</strong>s.<br />

Whilst strict statistical logic would <strong>de</strong>mand equal sized pan<strong>el</strong>s everywhere the money at risk argument<br />

often leads to compromise whereby larger areas may be capped off at a certain limit and smaller areas<br />

boosted up. The United Kingdom is an example of this illustrated by three of the thirteen regional areas<br />

(see Table 2).<br />

TABLE 2:<br />

EXAMPLE OF REGIONAL AREAS WITHIN THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />

One of the problems is that there is sometimes a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy to treat all the areas as having the same currency<br />

available. Thus the sample size for Bor<strong>de</strong>r hardly warrants pursuit of spot by spot buying, certainly<br />

not for sub-groups, but it sometimes happens. Possible remedies inclu<strong>de</strong> s<strong>el</strong>ling by schedules or aggregated<br />

ratings and factoring discussed <strong>el</strong>sewhere.<br />

An example of equal sized regional pan<strong>el</strong>s is B<strong>el</strong>gium with two equal pan<strong>el</strong>s of 750 households for each<br />

of the Flemish and French speaking parts. Paradoxically, although the national sample is about a third of<br />

the United Kingdom’s, the actual pan<strong>el</strong>s used for trading are larger. A regional programming and trading<br />

structure is one situation where, even with mass audience chann<strong>el</strong>s, the use of people meter pan<strong>el</strong>s leads<br />

to statistical strain. It seems lik<strong>el</strong>y, however, that there is a general trend towards trading t<strong>el</strong>evision advertising<br />

in larger units which may ease this.<br />

Services based upon new technology<br />

Percent of Meters Sample Size Households<br />

London 20.2% 11.7% 525<br />

North East 5.3% 6 .1% 275<br />

Bor<strong>de</strong>r 1.2% 2.2% 100<br />

The advent of sat<strong>el</strong>lite transmissions was a past example of this. There it was possible to recruit a special<br />

sample of sat<strong>el</strong>lite receivers who had a vastly increased range of programme choice compared with terrestrial<br />

reception. In the United Kingdom there was initially a se<strong>para</strong>te pan<strong>el</strong> but ultimat<strong>el</strong>y a specially<br />

weighted sub-sample of the main people meter pan<strong>el</strong>s was used. This currently provi<strong>de</strong>s a sample of<br />

around 1200 households.<br />

We expect that digital t<strong>el</strong>evision will be measured in the same way in the United Kingdom. This could initially<br />

involve special extra pan<strong>el</strong>s for sat<strong>el</strong>lite digital, terrestrial digital and even digital cable services since<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!