30.04.2013 Views

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC ...

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC ...

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ISOLATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>CHARACTERIZATION</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong><br />

FUNGI <strong>AND</strong> THEIR EFFECTIVENESS<br />

Thesis submitted to the<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad<br />

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the<br />

Degree of<br />

Doctor of Philosophy<br />

In<br />

AGRICULTURAL MICROBIOLOGY<br />

By<br />

BHARATHI H. TALWAR<br />

DEPARTMENT <strong>OF</strong> AGRICULTURAL MICROBIOLOGY<br />

COLLEGE <strong>OF</strong> AGRICULTURE, DHARWAD<br />

UNIVERSITY <strong>OF</strong> AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,<br />

DHARWAD - 580 005<br />

DECEMBER, 2005


Advisory Committee<br />

DHARWAD (J. H. KULKARNI)<br />

DECEMBER, 2005 MAJOR ADVISOR<br />

Approved by :<br />

Chairman : _________________________<br />

___<br />

(J. H. KULKARNI)<br />

Members : 1.<br />

_________________________<br />

_<br />

(A. R. ALAGAWADI)<br />

2.<br />

_________________________<br />

_<br />

(S. LINGAPPA)<br />

3.<br />

_________________________<br />

_<br />

(P. U. KRISHNARAJ)<br />

4.<br />

_________________________<br />

_<br />

(SRIKANT KULKARNI)


Chapter<br />

No.<br />

I INTRODUCTION<br />

C O N T E N T S<br />

II REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> LITERATURE<br />

III MATERIAL <strong>AND</strong> METHODS<br />

IV EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS<br />

V DISCUSSION<br />

VI SUMMARY<br />

VII REFERENCES<br />

APPENDICES<br />

Title


Table<br />

No.<br />

LIST <strong>OF</strong> TABLES<br />

Title<br />

1. Occurrence and pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi in<br />

different insect hosts<br />

2. Details of different pesticides used in the experiments<br />

3. Details of food grains evaluated for mass production of<br />

Metarhizium anisoplias and Verticillium lecanii<br />

4. Details of carrier materials evaluated for survival studies<br />

5. Details of intensive survey conducted for incidence of<br />

entomopathogenic fungi in northern Karnataka<br />

6. List of isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium lecanii<br />

obtained during the study<br />

7. Morphological and cultural characters of Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

and Verticillium lecanii isolates<br />

8. Mortality caused by the isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and<br />

Verticillium lecanii against Helicoverpa armigera and Brevicornia<br />

brassicae respectively<br />

9. Insect species found susceptible to Metarhizium anisopliae and<br />

Verticillium lecanii<br />

10. Total biomass production of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) as<br />

influenced by carbon sources<br />

11. Total biomass production of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) as<br />

influenced by nitrogen sources<br />

12. Total biomass production of Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) as influenced<br />

by carbon sources<br />

13. Total biomass production of Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) as influenced<br />

by nitrogen source


Contd…..<br />

Table<br />

No.<br />

Title<br />

14. Sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae Ma2 spores on different<br />

grains<br />

15. Sporulation of Verticillium lecanii Vl2 spores on different grains<br />

16. Sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae Ma2 spores on different<br />

agro wastes<br />

17. Sporulation of Verticillium lecanii Vl2 spores on agro wastes<br />

18. Effect of fungicides on the conidial germination of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae Ma2<br />

19. Effect of fungicides on the conidial germination of Verticullium<br />

lecanii<br />

20. Effect of insecticides on the conidial germination of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae<br />

21. Effect of insecticides on the conidial germination of Verticillium<br />

lecanii<br />

22. Effect of weedicides on the conidial germination of Metarihizium<br />

anisopliae<br />

23. Effect of weedicides on the conidial germination of Verticiliium<br />

lecanii<br />

24. Persistence of Metarhizium anisopliae in soil and phylloplane<br />

25. Persistence of Verticillium lecanii in soil and phylloplane<br />

26. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formulations under different storage temperature<br />

(20 DAI)<br />

27. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formulations under different storage temperature<br />

(45 DAI)


Contd…..<br />

Table<br />

No.<br />

Title<br />

28. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formulations under different storage temperature<br />

(75 DAI)<br />

29. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formulations under different storage temperature<br />

(90 DAI)<br />

30. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formulations under different storage temperature<br />

(120 DAI)<br />

31. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formulations under different storage temperature<br />

(150 DAI)<br />

32. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (20 DAI)<br />

33. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (45 DAI)<br />

34. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (75 DAI)<br />

35. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (90 DAI)<br />

36. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (120<br />

DAI)<br />

37. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (150<br />

DAI)<br />

38. Per cent mortality of Brevicornia brassicae due to application of<br />

Verticillium lecanii under laboratory conditions


Contd…..<br />

Table<br />

No.<br />

Title<br />

39. Per cent mortality of Aleurodicus dispersus due to application of<br />

Verticillium lecanii under laboratory conditions<br />

40. Per cent reduction of nymph of Brevicornia brassicae on cabbage<br />

due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) under field conditions<br />

41. Per cent reduction of nymph of Brevicornia brassicae on cabbage<br />

due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl2) under field conditions<br />

42. Per cent reduction of nymph of Brevicornia brassicae on cabbage<br />

due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl3) under field conditions<br />

43. Per cent reduction of nymph of Aphis crassivora on cowpea due to<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) under field conditions<br />

44. Per cent reduction of nymph of Aphis crassivora on cowpea due to<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Vl2) under field conditions<br />

45. Per cent reduction of nymph of Aphis crassivora on cowpea due to<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Vl3) under field conditions<br />

46. Effect of wild types and derived mutants (UV) of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae (Ma2) Helicoverpa armigera and Verticillium lecanii (Vl1)


Figure<br />

No.<br />

LIST <strong>OF</strong> FIGURES<br />

Title<br />

1. Mycopathogens of insect pests collected during survey in<br />

Northern Karnataka<br />

2. Conidial yield of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium<br />

lecanii on different food grains<br />

3. Conidial yield of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium<br />

lecanii on different agrowastes<br />

4. Effect of pesticides on the conidial germination of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae<br />

5. Effect of pesticides on the conidial germination of Verticillium<br />

lecanii<br />

6. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) and Verticillium<br />

lecanii (Vl1) in different formulations under different storage<br />

temperature (120 DAI)


Plate<br />

No.<br />

LIST <strong>OF</strong> PLATES<br />

Title<br />

1. Microconidiophore and microconidia of<br />

entomopathogens<br />

2. In vitro sporulation by different isolates of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae and Verticillium lecanii<br />

3. Host insects of Mearhizium anisopliae<br />

4. Host insects of Verticillium lecanii<br />

5. The mortality of Helicoverpa armigera topically applied<br />

with Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

6. Inhibition of growth of Metarhizium anisopliae and<br />

Verticillium lecanii by pesticide<br />

7. Metarhizium anisopliae cultured on rice for field use


Appendix<br />

No.<br />

LIST <strong>OF</strong> APPENDICES<br />

Title<br />

I. Mean monthly weather data at Main Agricultural Research<br />

Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad<br />

II. Survey proforma for Entomopathogenic fungi<br />

III. Identification report


I.INTRODUCTION<br />

The increased use of conventional chemical pesticides over the years has not only<br />

contributed to an increase in food production, but also has resulted in adverse effects on the<br />

environment and non-target organisms. In view of these side effects, the necessity for<br />

sustainable crop production through eco-friendly pest management technique is being largely<br />

felt in the recent times. Of the several microbial pathogens viz., bacteria, fungi, viruses,<br />

protozoans and entomopathogenic nematodes reported, only a few have been studied<br />

systematically for their usefulness. A careful evaluation of these beneficial pathogens can<br />

lead to gainful exploitation in microbial control programmes (Burges, 1998).<br />

India is bestowed with a rich biodiversity of entomopathogens and exploitation of<br />

these natural and renewable resource are essential in a successful biocontrol strategy. Not<br />

long after the discovery of fungi as the cause of some insect diseases, it was proposed to use<br />

fungi as biocontrol agents. Hence, a major motivation still exist for the exploitation of<br />

entomopathogenic fungi in the management of insect pests.<br />

Entomogenous fungi are potentially the most versatile biological control agents, due<br />

to their wide host range that often results in natural epizootics. An attractive feature of these<br />

fungi is that infectivity is by contact and the action is through penetration (Nadeau et al.,<br />

1996). These fungi comprise a heterogenous group of over 100 genera with approximately<br />

750 species, reported from different insects. Many of these offer a great potential in pest<br />

management. The most important fungal pathogens are Metarhizium spp., Beauveria spp.,<br />

Nomuraea rileyi, Verticillium lecanii and Hirsutella spp.<br />

In 1883, Metchinikoff initiated mass culturing of fungus and carried out the first<br />

experiment with two beetle pests. Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin is the<br />

second most widely exploited entomogenous fungus in biocontrol attempts. It is known to<br />

attack over 200 species of insects belonging to orders Coleoptera, Dermoptera, Homoptera,<br />

Lepidoptera and Orthoptera (Moore et al., 1996).<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) popularly called the “white holo” is known to cause<br />

mycosis in a number of insects belonging to the insect orders Homoptera, Coleoptera and<br />

Lepidoptera.<br />

Of the over 750 species of fungi known to be pathogenic to insects, six have been<br />

commercialized and the cosmopolitan pathogens, such as B. bassiana, M. anisopliae are the<br />

best known so far. Fungi often cause spectacular epizootics with large number of pathogenic<br />

insects showing visible fungal outgrowth (Hall, 1982). Conservation and periodic<br />

enhancement of efficacy of biological control agents will help in crop protection and in<br />

producing agricultural commodities free from pesticide residues. There is a general feeling<br />

that, the development and spread of biological control will empower the resource of poor<br />

farmers to manage their pest problems in an eco-friendly way. This assumes importance<br />

since the growth rate of the use of biopesticides alone over the next 10 years has been<br />

forecast at 10-14 per cent per annum, in contrast to two per cent for chemical pesticides.<br />

The major issues involved in mass production and utilization of mycopathogens are<br />

selection of effective strains, development of cost effective methods for mass rearing,<br />

development of effective methods for storage and shipment and creation of effective<br />

formulation.<br />

Environmental factors like temperature, humidity and sunlight play a profound role on<br />

the field persistence of entomopathogenic fungi. One of the critical factors in the effective use<br />

of microbial agents as insecticides is their relatively short persistence on leaf surfaces. The<br />

realization of the economic potential of mycoinsecticides would benefit from advances in<br />

biotechnology (Miranpuri and Khachatourians, 1995). Additionally, commercial considerations<br />

such as identification of existing or novel isolates, quality control of product and patent<br />

protection (Leathers et al., 1993) would benefit the development of efficient strains. Hence,<br />

the following objectives were outlined for this study:


1. Systematic survey, isolation and characterization of native entomopathogenic fungi<br />

from infected cadavers.<br />

2. Improvement of fungal virulence by mutagenesis.<br />

3. Field evaluation of the virulent pathogens against selected insects on a test crop.<br />

4. Optimization of economic mass production techniques of the virulent fungi and longterm<br />

storage formulation.<br />

5. Assessment of the compatibility of selected entomopathogenic fungi with<br />

agrochemicals.<br />

6. Analysis of persistence of selected entomopathogenic fungi on phylloplane and in soil.


II. REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> LITERATURE<br />

The various risk factors associated with the use of chemical insecticides such as<br />

development of resistance, associated resurgence in insects, accumulation of pesticidal<br />

residues in food chain, environmental pollution, health risks and high costs have driven the<br />

scientist and farmers to develop alternative strategies of pest management. This necessitated<br />

interest on the search for biotic agents that can control destructive pests of crops. Some of<br />

the most significant progress in recent years has come from studies of insect pathogens,<br />

particularly the entomogenous fungi.<br />

2.1 <strong>ISOLATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>CHARACTERIZATION</strong> <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI<br />

Even before the Christian Era, man has been concerned about diseased conditions in<br />

two of his domesticated insect species, the silk worm, Bombyx morii and the honey bee, Apis<br />

mellifera. The ancient Chinese silk manufacture was affected by fungus attack upon the<br />

silkworm. Before 1835, sericulturists thought that the diseases were caused by environmental<br />

or abnormal physiological conditions. Two fungi, Beauveria bassiana Bals. Vuillemin and<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae Metch. Sorokin are known to be pathogenic to the larval stage of the<br />

silkworm. Honeybees are known to be infected seriously by fungi such as Aspergillus flavus,<br />

Pericystis apis and Mucor hiemalis (Burges, 1981).<br />

Entomogenous fungi comprise a heterogenous group of cover 100 genera with<br />

approximately 750 species, reported from different insects and living in diverse habitats<br />

including fresh water, soil surfaces and aerospaces (Hajek and Ledger, 1994), many of which<br />

offer greater potential in pest management (Maddox, 1994). They belong to zygomycotina,<br />

ascomycotina, basidiomycotina and deuteromycotina. The major taxa of entompathogenic<br />

fungi are presented in Table 1. Several of these genera are principally or exclusively<br />

associated with a single family, genus or a few species of insect pests. A number of<br />

publications discuss insect mycosis caused by Entomopthora, Beauveria, Metarhizium and<br />

Aspergillus. Among the entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium spp. and Verticillium lecaniii<br />

(Zimm) have wide host range. Metarhizium spp. infect almost all insect orders (almost 7200<br />

insect species) inhabiting a variety of environmental niches like soil, soil surface, aerial<br />

location and fresh water. Verticillium lecanii on the other hand, is highly potent against various<br />

sucking pests (>50 insects spp.) in varied ecosystems.<br />

M. anisopliae has been reported to be effective in the suppression of soil borne pests<br />

like termites, crickets, locusts, brown plant hopper in rice, pyrilla, spittle bug in sugarcane and<br />

rootgrubs. The fungus as commercial product “metaquino” has been in use in Brazil. It was<br />

also used against coffee berry borer in Brazil and coconut leaf beetle in Taiwan. Usage of<br />

entomopathogenic fungi in IPM of rhinoceros beetle paid good dividend in Samoa (Ferron et<br />

al., 1975).<br />

V. lecanii has been proved to be a potent fungal pathogen in IPM of sucking pests.<br />

Wettable powder formulation (mycotol) caused high mortality of aphids, glasshouse whiteflies,<br />

thrips on tomato and ornamental crops. The organism exhibited greater promise in the<br />

management of coffee green scale in peninsulur India (Wilding, 1981). Other fungi pathogenic<br />

on insects include Coelomyces, Nomuraea, Fusarium and Hirsutella.<br />

The green muscardine fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae was described for the first time<br />

by Metschnikoff in 1879 as Entomophthora anisopliae. Tulloch (1976) changed the name to<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae and identified another species Metarhizium flavoviride. Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae has been recorded from over two hundred insect hosts belonging to Orthoptera,<br />

Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera (Veen, 1968).<br />

Gams (1971) placed all hyphomycetes in the genus Cephalosporium. However, this<br />

broad categorization caused some confusion in the interpretation of this genus. The<br />

cephalosporia was re-examined and placed in a group of species containing many


entomogenous fungi into a new section. One of these, Verticillium lecanii, contains numerous<br />

hitherto separated species, many of which have been described as insect pathogens.<br />

The entomopathogenic fungus N. rileyi was described for the first time by Farlow in<br />

1883 as Botrytis rileyi. Later, it was transferred to Spicaria (Beauveria rileyi) by Charles in<br />

1936. Kish et al. (1974) changed the name of Spicaria rileyi (Farlow) Charles to Nomuraea<br />

rileyi (Farlow) Samson. The genus Beauveria was described in 1912 by Vuillemin Maclleod.<br />

Dead larvae generally mummify due to fungal infection. The cadavers show an initial white<br />

mycelial growth on the insect surface (except on the head capsule) and dark green (M.<br />

anisopliae), white (Verticillium lecanii) due to formation of conidia either in localized patches<br />

or over the entire surface. However, difference in conidial colour was observed. Hence, for<br />

confirmation of the pathogen, microscopic examination (400x) was necessary. N. rileyi<br />

conidiophores bear dense whorls of branches and phialides i.e. conidiogenous cells which are<br />

short necked, conidia are broadly ellipsoidal to cylindrical 3.5 – 4.5 x 2.3 µm.<br />

The conidiophores of M. anisopliae are arranged in compact to nearly stomatic<br />

patches, mostly, mononematous. Conidigenous cells phialides in whorls, arranged in a candle<br />

like fashion, clavate to cylindrical, conidia are single celled, smooth walled hyaline to slightly<br />

coloured, forming long chain often aggregated into prismatic columns whereas, in case of<br />

Verticillium, phialides usually are awl shaped conidia of various shape produced in slimy<br />

heads.<br />

2.2 SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> ISOLATES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong><br />

FUNGI<br />

Isolates of the fungus from different host insects have varying degrees of virulence as<br />

measured by per cent mortality in bio assays (Ignoffo et al., 1976), broader host range and<br />

time taken for spore germination. The characteristic of the isolates selected for field use<br />

should necessarily be virulent, specific, amenable to mass production and withstand the<br />

environment in which it is used. The insect however, present natural barrier to infection.<br />

A variety of fungicides and antibiotics have been used in selective media to isolate<br />

entomogenous fungi, Metarhizium spp. and Beauveria spp. from environments such as the soil.<br />

The first media (Veen and Ferron, 1966) contained chloramphenicol and cycloheximide<br />

(Actidione) and were based on a medium developed for the isolation of fungi from clinical<br />

specimens. Later, a simplified form of medium of Veen and Ferron, known as “Veen’s<br />

medium” has been successfully used in their laboratory (Milner et al., 1992) and many other<br />

laboratories for quantitative isolation of Metarhizium spp. from soil. Other workers, notably<br />

Doberski and Tribe (1980) have used similar media.<br />

In 1982, it was found that media incorporating the fungicides, dodine<br />

(N=dodecylguanidine monoacetate) successfully isolated Metarhizium anisopliae from garden<br />

soil while normal soil planting media did not (Beiharz et al., 1982). This lead to the<br />

development of Dodine based media for selective isolation of Beauveria bassiana from soil<br />

(Chase et al., 1986) and M. anisopliae from cockroaches. Liu et al. (1993) studied the effects<br />

of different concentrations of dodine on germination and colony formation by nine isolates of<br />

Metarhizium spp. Because of difference between isolates in their susceptibility to dodine, the<br />

lower concentration of 10 µg/ml was recommended for selective isolation from soil.<br />

M. anisopliae and B. bassiana have a world wide distribution as members of the<br />

natural soil flora (Zimmermann, 1993). M. anisopliae has been reported in soils from widely<br />

differing climatic zones and have entomopathogenic activity against a range of insect pests<br />

(Gillespie and Claydon, 1989 and McCoy et al., 1988). Yip et al. (1992) characterized 204<br />

cultures of M. anisopliae isolated from Tasmanian soil and grouped them into 16 strains.<br />

Margaret et al. (1991) isolated Verticillium lecanii from larvae of pear thrips and<br />

suggested relatively high incidence and wide distribution of V. lecanii infection in Vermount.


The entomopathogenic fungi so far isolated along with their host are mentioned in<br />

Table 1.<br />

2.3 MODE <strong>OF</strong> ENTRY <strong>AND</strong> VIRULENCE <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI<br />

Pathogenesis is the process of chain of events in the disease development in a host<br />

upon infection. Differing from bacteria and viruses, fungal pathogenesis in insects occurs via<br />

a series of integrated, systematic events progressing upon spore attachment to germination,<br />

penetration, growth and proliferation within the body of the host, interaction with insect<br />

defense mechanism and finally re-emergence on the cadavers (Nadeau et al., 1996; Thomas<br />

et al., 1996).<br />

The infective unit in most of the entomopathogenic fungi is a conidium or spores<br />

which when land on a susceptible host, put forth germ tubes or infection pegs from<br />

appressoria. These structures secrete a complex of cuticle degrading enzymes viz.,<br />

chitinases, proteases and lipases, which are capable of hydrolyzing corresponding cuticular<br />

constituents viz., chitin, protein and lipids (St Leger et al., 1992). This facilitated the germ tube<br />

to invade haemocoel and fat bodies. The invading vegetative hyphae consumes the contents<br />

of haemolymph for its growth and metamorphosis. On exhaustion of the haemolymph content,<br />

the host insect become moribund and the fungi sporulate after death of the host.<br />

Undoubtedly, many pathogen enzymes are important determinants of virulence since<br />

they enable the pathogen to coexist with the changing metabolic processes associated with<br />

the host’s diseased state. St Leger et al. (1992) cloned a gene encoding protease (Pr1) from<br />

M. anisopliae which solubilized cuticle protein to assist penetration and provided the nutrients<br />

for further growth (St Leger et al., 1988).<br />

The cuticle is the first barrier to infection by fungi. Hence, rapid and direct penetration<br />

of the cuticle is important for virulence (Pekrul and Grula, 1979). The insect procutide is<br />

primarily chitin fibrils embedded in a protein matrix and penetration appeared to involve both<br />

mechanical and enzymatic components (Charnley and St. Leger, 1989; St. Leger et al.,<br />

1988). Penetration is a stage of infection where specificity may be determined since, many<br />

pathogens are virulent after being injected into the haemolymph of an otherwise nonsusceptible<br />

host. Virulent isolates, however, had 10-17 times more endochitinase activity and<br />

15-28 times more exochitinase activity than virulent isolates (El-Sayed et al., 1992).<br />

Metabolites of fungal pathogens are involved in the infection process. Pigments like<br />

bio-chrome such as bassianin and tenellin or dibenzoguinones such as oosporin are<br />

responsible for colour change in the insect body (Sundarababu, 1985). Many of the<br />

entomopathogenic fungi produce toxins which act as poisons for the insects and thereby are<br />

killed.<br />

Aerial conidia sporulated from infected or mummified cadavers are widely<br />

disseminated by wind. Splashing of rain also accounted for spreading but only for short<br />

distances. In water stagnated irrigated rice ecosystem, the fungal propagules (conidia or<br />

spores) are disseminated through irrigation water (Ambethgar, 1991).


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 1. Occurrence and pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi in<br />

different insect hosts<br />

Insect species Fungi Insect order Crop plant Country References<br />

1. Adoryphorus couloni<br />

(Burm).<br />

2. Ancognatha<br />

scarabaecide<br />

3. Aphodius tasmaniae<br />

Postuare<br />

4. Coleomegilla<br />

maculate<br />

5. Phyllophaga anxia<br />

(Leconte)<br />

6. Popillia japonica<br />

Newn.<br />

7. Pterostichus sp.<br />

(Nialoe)<br />

8. Ferficual auricularia<br />

L.<br />

9. Acyrthosiphon<br />

pisum (Maskel)<br />

10. Nilaparvata lugens<br />

(Stal.)<br />

11. Agrotis segetum<br />

(D&S)<br />

12. Austracris guttulosa<br />

(Walker)<br />

13. Locusta magratoria<br />

(L.)<br />

14. Mahanarva postica<br />

(Stal.)<br />

15. Orinebius kanetataki<br />

(Finot)<br />

16. Cosmopolites<br />

sordidus (Ger.)<br />

17. Dicladispa armigera<br />

(Oliver)<br />

18. Leptinotarsa<br />

decemlineata (Say)<br />

19. Plocaederus<br />

ferrugineus (Linn.)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - Australia Rath et al.<br />

(1995)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - Columbia Rath et al.<br />

(1995)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - Australia Rath et al.<br />

(1995)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - Australia Rath et al.<br />

(1995)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - Canada Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - Japan Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Coleoptera - USA Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Dermoptera - UK Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera - UK Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera Rice India,<br />

Srilanka<br />

Ambethgar<br />

(1997)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera - UK Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera Cruciferous<br />

vegetables<br />

Australia Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera Many crops Germany Kleepies and<br />

Zimmerman<br />

(1992)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera - Brazil Kleepies and<br />

Zimmerman<br />

(1992)<br />

Metarhizium Orthoptera - Brazil Kleepies and<br />

Zimmerman<br />

(1992)<br />

Beauveria spp. Coleoptera Banana Kenya Kaaya et al.<br />

(1991)<br />

Beauveria spp. Coleoptera Rice India Puzari et al.<br />

(1997)<br />

Beauveria spp. Coleoptera - USA Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Beauveria spp. Coleoptera Cashew India Ambethagar et<br />

al. (1998)<br />

20. Apis gossypii (Glov) Beauveria spp. Homoptera Beans Columbia Landa (1984)<br />

21. Bemisia argentifoli<br />

(Geog)<br />

22. Nilaparvata lugens<br />

(Stal)<br />

Beauveria spp. Homoptera Beans Columbia Landa (1984)<br />

Beauveria spp. Homoptera Rice India Ambethagar<br />

(1996)


Table 1. Contd…..<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Insect species Fungi Insect order Crop plant Country References<br />

23. Agrotis segetum<br />

(Schiff)<br />

24. Cnaphalocrocis<br />

medinalis (Guenee)<br />

25. Helicoverpa<br />

armigera (Hub.)<br />

Beauveria Lepidoptera Crucifers UK Butt et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

Beauveria Lepidoptera Rice India Ambethgar<br />

(1991)<br />

Beauveria Lepidoptera Chickpea<br />

pigeonpea<br />

26. Achaea janata Linn. N. rileyi Lepidoptera Castor<br />

bean<br />

27. Anticarsia<br />

gemmatalis (Hb.)<br />

28. Helicoverpa<br />

armigera (Hub.)<br />

29. Heliothis subflxa<br />

Guene<br />

30. Peridroma saucia<br />

(Hubner)<br />

31. Spodoptera exigue<br />

(Hbst.)<br />

32. Spodoptera litura<br />

(F.)<br />

33. Stenachroia<br />

elongella Hmps<br />

34. Myzus persicae<br />

Sulzer<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera Velvet<br />

bean and<br />

soybean<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera Potato and<br />

tomato<br />

India Gopalkrishnan<br />

and Narayan<br />

an (1988)<br />

India Vimladevi<br />

(1994)<br />

Brazil<br />

Ecuador<br />

Indonesia<br />

and Korea<br />

Stansly et al.<br />

(1990);<br />

Gilreath et al.<br />

(1986)<br />

Hugar and<br />

Hegde (1996)<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera - USA Ignoffo (1981)<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera Soybean USA Puttler et al.<br />

(1976)<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera Soybean India Phadke et al.<br />

(1978)<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera Tobacco<br />

chilli<br />

India,<br />

Japan<br />

Roa and<br />

Phadke (1977)<br />

N. rileyi Lepidoptera Sorghum India Phadke et al.<br />

(1978)<br />

V. lecanii Homoptera Salad<br />

crops<br />

- Chandler<br />

(1992)


2.4 ENVIRONMENT INFLUENCE ON NATURAL<br />

PATHOGENICITY<br />

Environmental factors which influence the virulence of entomopathogens must be<br />

considered for the successful development of the fungus as a biocontrol agent. Of all the<br />

ecofactors that influence epizootic of a mycopathogen, none is more critical for sporulation,<br />

germination and invasion of the host than high humidity (>90% RH) (Getzin, 1961; Allen et al.,<br />

1971). Pathogenesis occurs at much lower ambient values (Ferron, 1978; Ramoska, 1982)<br />

probably because of high humidity in the microclimate at the insect cuticle. It is certain,<br />

however, that the external sporulation never occurs on the killed insect, if the relative humidity<br />

is too low.<br />

The rapidity of mycelial development and therefore, the rapidity of the evolution of<br />

infection depends on temperature. In general, optimum values fall between 20°C and 30°C<br />

(for example, 23°C for Beauveria brongiartii, 24°C for Entomophthora obscura, 25°C for<br />

Beauveria bassiana and Nomuraea rileyi and 27°C-28°C for Metarhizium anisopliae) with<br />

limits between 5° and 35°C. Temperatures lower than the optima distinctly retard the<br />

development of mycosis without necessarily affecting the total mortality (Ferron, 1978).<br />

Atmospheric temperature between 20°C and 30°C did not limit the growth and<br />

sporulation of N. rileyi. On the other hand, since the fungus will not grow below 15°C and<br />

sporulate above 30°C, long periods at these extreme limit both the initiation and development<br />

of epizootics (Ignoffo et al., 1976). The spore germination and colony growth of the C-3<br />

isolate of Verticillium lecanii had similar temperature optima. Conidia germinated more rapidly<br />

between 20°C and 25°C. Both germination and growth declined steeply above 25°C and<br />

ceased above 30°C (Burges, 1981). Gillespie and Crawford (1986) found that the infectious<br />

conidia of three isolates of M. anisopliae did not germinate at 93 per cent RH and that<br />

germination was inhibited significantly below 98 per cent RH. They reported similar results in<br />

the isolates of Verticillium, Beauveria and Paecilomycos, suggesting that the requirement for<br />

high humidity was fundamental to these fungi and strains with reduced dependence on<br />

humidity were unlikely to be found. Drummond et al. (1987), however, found that some<br />

isolates of Verticillium lecanii could tolerate lower humidities.<br />

Hywel-Jones and Gillespie (1990) examined spore germination of M. anisopliae and<br />

B. bassiana at 20-30°C and found higher germination levels (95% in 10-14 h) in M. anisopliae<br />

as compared to B. bassiana (95% in 14-15 h).<br />

The optimum temperature for the development of the fungus is not necessarily the<br />

same for the development of the disease. However, the influence of temperature on the host<br />

insect must be taken into consideration, since very short periods between moults resulting<br />

from a high temperature may reduce, for example, the duration of the instar to an extent that<br />

penetration of the fungus through the integrument is impeded.<br />

Survival of M. anisopliae applied to soil depend on a range of physical and biological<br />

factors such as soil moisture, temperature and other soil microbes (Lingg and<br />

Donalson, 1981). The inoculum of N. rileyi when exposed to direct sunlight on the upper leaf<br />

surface of cabbage reduced the half-life of spores to 3.6 h (Fargues et al., 1983).<br />

Rath (1992) found that the distribution and abundance of M. anisopliae and B.<br />

bassianas strains varied with rainfall, soil type and pH. However, there was no obvious<br />

relationship between temperature and the distribution of M. anispliae strains. However, the<br />

strains could be separated on the basis of the temperature range over which they germinated<br />

(McCammon and Rath, 1994).<br />

M. anisopliae DATF-001 spores were able to germinate on Czapeck-dox agar at all<br />

temperature from 2 to 25°C. Rath et al. (1995) tested the third instar larvae of Adoryphrous<br />

couloni with a concentration of 4.1 x 10 6 spores/g at different temperature. DATF-001 was<br />

pathogenic at all the temperatures and the LT50 values ranges from 36.1 days at 15°C to<br />

188.9 days at 5°C.


Milner et al. (2002) studied the effect of relative humidities (RH) from 90 to 100 per<br />

cent on germination of a termite-active isolate of M. anisopliae (isolate F125 and FI610) using<br />

a liquid germinating medium. Germination was increasingly delayed at water activities<br />

equivalent to 99, 98 and 96 per cent RH and was completely inhibited at 94, 92 and 90 per<br />

cent.<br />

Forgues and Luz (2000) studied the effect of both moisture and temperature on the<br />

infectivity of Beauveria bassiana and reported that the most favourable conditions were 97<br />

per cent RH and temperature of 20°C combined with either 75 per cent, 25°C or 43 per<br />

cent. Under less favourable alternating conditions (lower and higher temperature) the amount<br />

of inoculum required for killing 50 per cent of first instar nymph was 10 or 20 times higher.<br />

2.5 MASS PRODUCTION <strong>OF</strong> THE <strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong><br />

FUNGI<br />

2.5.1 Nutritional requirements<br />

The growth requirements of most entomopathogenic fungi have been poorly defined<br />

despite the fact that this information is essential for mass production. The choice of the<br />

nutrients will obviously be directly related to the nutritional requirements of the selected<br />

fungus. Entompathogenic fungi require oxygen, water, an organic source of carbon and<br />

energy, a source of inorganic or organic nitrogen and additional elements including minerals<br />

and growth factors.<br />

Many nutrient compounds including carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids, and<br />

vitamins are important components of plants root exudates and soil. In addition to significant<br />

quantities of these substances exuded from healthy roots, more are released through cell<br />

lysis. The survival of fungi in a soil may be affected greatly by these compounds through their<br />

effects on mycelial growth, sporulation and conidial germination. Organic acids are important,<br />

not only because they are a source of readily available substrates for soil microorganisms, but<br />

also because of their secondary effects such as modification of pH in the rhizosphere and<br />

chelation of metals (Rovira and Wildermuth, 1981).<br />

Nutrients are also present on the surface of insects. Woods and Grula (1984)<br />

reported the presence of 17 amino acids, glucosamie, amines and peptides on the surface of<br />

Helicoverpa zea larvae and that these were sufficient to initiate germination and support the<br />

growth of Beauveria bassiana and Aspergillus niger. Smith and Grula (1983) suggested that<br />

nutrients on insect larval surfaces supported the conidial germination of B. bassiana.<br />

Mass production of B. bassiana on solid or liquid media under sterile or semi sterile<br />

conditions has been described (Samsinakova et al., 1981).<br />

According to Riba and Glander (1980), Tween-80 and higher concentration of yeast<br />

extract are the most essential components of the culture medium. Sutton et al. (1981)<br />

reported that casein at a concentration of 0.04 per cent and trehalose at 0.28 per cent<br />

promoted the growth of N. rileyi. However, ascorbic acid levels tested had no significant effect<br />

on the mycelial development. In vitro utilization of available complex proteins, trehalose and<br />

other nutrients govern the parasitic nature of the pathogen.<br />

Holdom et al. (1986) from their studies in Australia showed that N. rileyi could grow<br />

on an inexpensive protein based culture medium made of Brewer’s yeast, yeast hydrolysate,<br />

skim milk powder and whole milk powder. Various carbon sources such as soluble starch,<br />

corn starch or malt extract were additionally used with the protein base medium. However,<br />

neither the growth and conidial production were consistent. Carrot malt agar and oats malt<br />

agar were good for sporulation of N. rileyi (Balardin and Loch, 1989). The best combination of<br />

components for sporulation of the Londrina isolates was 340 ml carrot extract and 22 g malt<br />

meal per litre of water with 12 min sterilization. Dillon and Charnley (1990) found that soaking<br />

M. anisopliae conidia in distilled water could stimulate initial process in conidial germination,


and that the conidia needed carbon sources for spherical growth and germ-tube formation.<br />

Maltose and dextrose were found to be good carbon sources for sporulation of N. rileyi (Im et<br />

al., 1988; Vimaladevi, 1995). The fungus grew well on media with pH 5-8.<br />

Li and Holdom (1994) examined the effects of a range of carbon, nitrogen sources<br />

and vitamins on colony formation, mycelial growth and sporulation of two isolates (EF25 and<br />

EF55) and concluded that soluble starch was best among different carbon sources tested for<br />

growth of M. anisopliae. Interestingly, they found that nitrogen sources rich in amino acids<br />

showed stimulatory effect on growth and germination.<br />

Gopalkrishnan and Mohan (2000) tested 13 different synthetic media for sporulation<br />

of N. rileyi. Only SMAY, Carrot Agar Yeast (CAY), Corn Meal Agar Yeast (CMAY), Nutrient<br />

Agar Yeast (NAY) and Czepecks dox Agar Yeast (CAY) showed sporulation. According to<br />

them, enrichment of synthetic media with yeast extract was a must for mycelial growth and<br />

sporulation. SMAY and CAY were found suitable for production and culturing of N. rileyi.<br />

Though the spore yield in both cases did not differ (0.56 g/100 ml of medium) cost wise, CAY<br />

was cheaper.<br />

James (2001) tested exogenous protein and sugar sources on conidial germination of<br />

two pathogens, Beauveria bassiana and paecilomyces fumosoroseus. In liquid culture, sugars<br />

stimulated only 5-27 per cent germination of B. bassiana and less than or equal to 11 per cent<br />

germination of P. fumosorosus, whereas yeast extract or peptone stimulated 95-100 per cent<br />

germination.<br />

Rath et al. (1995) examined the utilization of 49 carbohydrates for 134 isolates of M.<br />

anisopliae and concluded that carbohydrate utilization was a useful and biologically relevant<br />

taxonomic criteria for the separation of Metarhizium strains and other entomogenous fungi.<br />

2.5.2 Natural media<br />

Several attempts have been made to multiply the entomogenous fungi using semisynthetic<br />

media and solid substrates in order to cut down the cost of production. Simple and<br />

cost effective mass production technology is required to make it a highly acceptable bioagent.<br />

It is reported the most of the deuteromycetes sporulate readily on solid media under<br />

aerated conditions. Semi solid fermentation provide an alternate in which the fungi grown<br />

primarily on the wet surface of a solid material form of processed cereal grains to which<br />

nutritional adjuvants were added or media of low value such as agricultural wastes. Loose<br />

substrates were observed to yield more conidia than solid substrates like agar (Muller, 2000).<br />

For mass production of conidia of M. anisopliae, a number of naturally occurring<br />

carrier cum growth media have been evaluated. Fogal et al. (1986) described a simple mass<br />

production technique for M. anisopliae using wheat bran as the carrier medium. A number of<br />

carrier cum growth media such as wheat bran sorghum grains, boiled rice grains, coffee husk,<br />

coconut water etc. have been used to assess their efficacy in promoting the growth and<br />

sporulation of M. anisopliae. Results showed that boiled rice was the best carrier cum growth<br />

medium followed by wheat bran and sorghum grain for profuse growth and abundant<br />

sporulation of M. anisopliae. As rice and sorghum grains are expensive the use of wheat bran<br />

as carrier medium is more profitable.<br />

Mass culturing of B. bassiana and production of conidial masses have been achieved<br />

using substrates such as wheat bran, whole grains, hay, straw, potatoes etc. either in plastic<br />

bottles, flasks or trays. McCoy and Carver (1941) described a simple method for the mass<br />

production of conidia of B. bassiana using wheat bran as the carrier medium.<br />

Grain and bagasse were shown to support the multiplication of the mycopathogen in<br />

a two phase conidial. The yield was significantly reduced on synthetic media but cost was low<br />

(Holdom et al., 1986). Silva and Loch (1987) opined that the organism could easily be<br />

multiplied on polished rice grains. Boiling the rice grains before sterilization resulted in higher<br />

spore yields. The entomopathogenic M. anisopliae was grown on several laboratory media of<br />

which Czapecks Dox medium was most suitable. The optimum temperature for growth was


25°C for sporulation and biomass production. Among various cereal grains tested as growth<br />

media, rice was the most suitable substrate. Among the agro-based material tested, puffed<br />

rice waste was found to be superior (Patel and Yadav, 1990).<br />

A method for production of the entomogenous fungus Metarhizium anisopliae on<br />

coarse grain rice was described (Quintela and McCoy, 1997). The production of conidia on<br />

coarse grain was significantly greater than on whole grain. With coarse grain, there was<br />

reduction in the cost of production by four times and increase in the production of conidia by<br />

30 per cent.<br />

Vimaladevi (1994) cultured the mycopathogen N. rileyi on crushed sorghum enriched<br />

with one per cent yeast extract. Sporulation was highest with maximum of 1.44 x 10 9<br />

conidia/g of crushed sorghum after 8-9 days at 25°C. Lopez et al. (1995) grew the fungus N.<br />

rileyi on rice sorghum and soybean and stored it for three months at 40°C. Multiplication on<br />

barley and also a semisynthetic medium wherein maltose was replaced by cereal extract<br />

were promising for cost effective production of the mycopathogen. Kulkarni (1999) studied the<br />

suitability of different cereal grains for mass production of N. rileyi and found that sorghum<br />

and rice grains were the most efficient media with an yield of 13.45 x 10 8 and 13.15 x 10 8<br />

respectively.<br />

Lopez et al. (1995) used six plant waste substrates; palm leaves (Phoenix dactylifera,<br />

Phoenix canariensis, Washingtonia filfera and Chamaerops humilis), Phoenix dactylifera seed<br />

and almond mesocarp to mass produce entomopathogens (Verticillium lecanii, Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae, Paecilomyces farinosus, Beauveria bassiana). Of all the plant waste substrates<br />

tested, only M. anisopliae grew on almond mesocarp. C. humilis leaves were excellent<br />

substrates for the growth and sporulation of both V. lecanii and B. bassiana, B. bassiana grew<br />

best on seeds of P. dactilyfera.<br />

2.5.3 Formulation<br />

Despite the wide host range of the fungi, the number of commercial products of these<br />

fungi has been small. Most of these products have tended to be ephemeral and it is therefore,<br />

difficult to specify the products available for sale at any one date. Those on sale at present<br />

include a few wettable powders that have been available since 1980’s e.g. Vertalac against<br />

aphids and mycotal against white flies, sporadically used in European greenhouses and<br />

containing blastospores of different strains of Verticillium lecanii. Beauveria bassiana has<br />

been applied on a large scale on various out door pests in Russia (Boverin), China and Brazil<br />

(Metarhizium anisopliae). Products including bioblast (Metarhizium anisopliae) against<br />

termites in the USA and Naturalis (B. bassiana) in France are being used (Burges, 1998).<br />

2.6 STORAGE <strong>OF</strong> THE FORMULATION <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI<br />

Because of their lipophilic sufaces, dry and dusty conidia mix readily in oil. However,<br />

conidia of M. flavoviride freshly harvested by suction but not pre-dried did not survive as well<br />

in undried oil as in an unformulated powder. More pre-dried conidia germinated after storage<br />

as a dry powder with silica gel pellets than as an oil suspension (Morley-Davies et al., 1995).<br />

For example after 13 weeks storage at six temperatures between 10 and 50°C, the difference<br />

ranged between 3 and 12 per cent germination. The opposite effect was found by Moore et al.<br />

(1996) in their only batch of pre-dried conidia stored both as a powder (76 per cent<br />

germination) and in oil (91% germination).<br />

Studdert et al. (1990) coated dry B. bassiana conidia with a bentonite clay by mixing<br />

1:3 by weight, moistening a thin layer tightly with a water mist and drying. The clay increased<br />

the half-life of conidia in both sandy loam and peat from 207 weeks to 7-12 weeks at 30°C<br />

and from 12-44 weeks to 20-64 weeks at 10°C, at different combinations of soil and moisture<br />

content. Fargues et al. (1983) prolonged survival of B. bassiana blastopores by clay coating.<br />

Inglis et al. (1993) found that Beauveria bassiana conidia dispersed better in oil<br />

(Mycotech 9209) than in 0.05 per cent aqueous Tween-80, while substantial clumping


occurred in a 5 per cent emulsion of the oil in water even after homogenization. Conidia of<br />

Metarhizium flavoviride in sprays of oil and oil in water emulsion survived longer on foliage<br />

than those in water, which they presumed to be because, the oil component gave greater<br />

protection from environmental stresses (Jenkins and Thomas, 1996).<br />

Nutrients such as cereal flour can be formulated as the carrier in a dust on wettable<br />

powder. The best known example is Verticillium lecanii in the products Vertalec and Mycotal,<br />

used against aphid and whitefly intermittently since 1980 (Burges, 1981; Ravensberg et al.,<br />

1990). Flour based V. lecanii products gave better pest control than sprays of spores alone<br />

(Kanagaratnam et al., 1982).<br />

Very few oils have been tested in the presence of dried silica gel. With M. flavoviride,<br />

there was no consistent difference between diesel oil, odourless kerosene, shellsol k, aviation<br />

fuel, groundnut oil or soy oil. Anti oxidants improved conidial survival in groundnut oil and in<br />

soy oil by 23-26 per cent (Moore et al., 1996).<br />

For conidial storage, mineral oils collectively, were similar to vegetable oils, some of<br />

which have the disadvantages of rancidity and solidification over long periods at high ambient<br />

temperature. Kerosene was found to be slightly better than groundnut (Stathers et al., 1993).<br />

Certain fatty acids from rancid oil inhibit germination of M. flavoviride conidia (Barnes and<br />

Moore, 1997).<br />

Hayler (1993) reported that the addition of rape seed oil to the fungus, V. lecanii<br />

increased efficiency upto 90 per cent when tested on. A. gossypii and Frankliniella<br />

occidentalis on cucumber in a greenhouse experiment.<br />

2.7 EFFICACY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI AGAINST<br />

INSECTS<br />

2.7.1 Efficacy of Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) against aphids<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) (Monilales:Moniliaceae), an entomopathogenic fungus<br />

found world wide, has been used successfully as biological control agent against various<br />

species of aphids for number of years (Hall, 1982).<br />

The suspension of Verticillium lecanii with concentration of 16 x 10 6 spores/ml, when<br />

used against coffee green bug, Coccus viridis (Green) in Tamil Nadu, gave 16.6 per cent<br />

morality. The sprays containing surface active agents like Teepol, Triton x 100 at 0.03 per<br />

cent or glycerol at 0.1-0.3 per cent gave 48.9, 79.9 and 22.4 to 31.0 per cent mortality,<br />

respectively. Khalil et al. (1983) in Czechoslovakia, while studying on V. lecanii, found that<br />

when the fungus was applied at concentration of 10 8 spores/ml in sprays to plants in<br />

glasshouse was highly effective against the aphid species, Aphis fabae on sugar beet and<br />

Myzus persicae on cucumber.<br />

The effect of a range of humidities on the transmission and sporulation of a<br />

commercial preparation (Vertalec) of V. lecanii was investigated in greenhouse at 20°C on<br />

capsicum against aphid M. persicae by Milner and Lutton (1986). They found that at least 36<br />

hours is required for infection at 100 per cent relative humidity. After 96 hours of spraying,<br />

94.5 per cent of M. persicae were infected.<br />

Evaluation of the entomopathogen V. lecanii in the control of the aphid, M. persicae<br />

on chrysanthemum was conducted by Hincapie et al. (1990). Three strains of the fungus viz.,<br />

VL-A, isolate from M. persicae, VL-GC isolated from Erinnyis ello and VL-MR from<br />

trialeurodes vaporariorum Weshw were used. VL-A caused 100 per cent mortality compared<br />

to 37.5 per cent for VL-GC and 30 per cent for Vl-MR. Three concentrations of VL-A was<br />

evaluated (1x10 4 , 1x10 6 , 1x10 8 ) and the mortality increased from 39.5 to 100 per cent.


Pathogencity of various strains/isolates of V. lecanii has been well established<br />

against various aphid species viz., A. fabae, D. noxia (Fegan et al., 1992), Sitobian avenae F.<br />

(Fegan et al., 1993; Miranpuri and Khachatourians, 1995), R. padi and M. persicae (Gardner<br />

et al., 1998).<br />

Khalil et al. (1990) studied the effectiveness of V. lecanii against the aphid M.<br />

persicae in laboratory, on one year old potted peach plants. The fungus was effective at<br />

concentrations of 10, 10 5 and 10 7 spores/ml with number of aphids alive/cm leaf area after 25<br />

days being 0.68, 0.61 and 0.57, respectively, compared with the control value of 1.91.<br />

Masuda and Kikuchi (1992) investigated pathogenicity of V. lecanii isolates on<br />

aphids, A. gossypii, M. persicae and whitefly T. vaporariorum. Both isolates MGV118 and<br />

MGV 145 were pathogenic to larvae and adults of T. vaporariorum than MGV 145. MGV 145 was<br />

stronger than that of MGV118 on the apterous adults of A. gossypi and adults of M. persicae.<br />

The mortalities caused by the two isolates were almost the same (96-100%) at higher<br />

concentration (10 7 and 10 8 conidia/ml).<br />

Two years of laboratory and field assessments using entomopathogenic fungus, V.<br />

lecanii against Saskatoon berry leaf aphid, Acryrthosiphon macrosiphum (Wilson) showed 70<br />

per cent aphid kill, three days after treatment. After five days of treatments, it showed 90 to<br />

100 per cent aphid kill, three days after treatments. After five days of treatment, it showed 90<br />

to 100 per cent aphid mortality as compared to 35 per cent in control groups. Field tests using<br />

two application of V. lecanii showed a significant decline in aphid population as compared to<br />

that on the water treated plants (Miranpuri and Khachatourians, 1995).<br />

2.7.2 Effect of V. lecanii against whitefly<br />

On the spiraling whitefly, A. disperses, no research work on the use of microbial<br />

pesticides has been carried out so far.<br />

Quinden (1984) tested the mycotal formulation of the fungus Verticillium lecanii<br />

applied to tomato crop against greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes Vaporariorum at the rate of<br />

5 x 10 11 spores/ha which gave significant control of the aleyrodid only 16 days after<br />

application.<br />

Suklova (1989) reported that V. lecanii + boverin (Beauveria bassiana) gave 98 per<br />

cent control of whitefly. Optimum condition for these fungi was 80-90 per cent relative<br />

humidity and a temperature of 26-28°C.<br />

Meade and Bruce (1991) reported on the mortality of various instars of B. tabaci and<br />

T. vaporariorum resulting from exposure to V. lecanii. The mortality of nymphs of all three<br />

instars of both species due to fungal infection was significantly higher than that in other<br />

treatments.<br />

According to Nier et al. (1993), the pathogencity of V. lecanii against nymphs of T.<br />

vaporariorum and B. tabaci at the concentration of 3.2 x 10 6 conidia per ml gave 91 and 100<br />

per cent mortality, respectively, but a suspension containing 1 x 10 7 conidia per ml resulted in<br />

infection rate of 78 per cent. B. tabaci was found more susceptible than T. vaporariorum.<br />

Application of the fungus, Paecilomyces persimilis (Wize) followed by three<br />

introductions of two Encarsia formosa per plant and treatment of Ashersonia species gave<br />

good control as did the application of V. lecanii against B. tabaci (Landa, 1984).<br />

Field trials were carried out in Tamil Nadu by Jayaraj (1989) to determine the<br />

effectiveness of V. lecanii in controlling the coffee scale Coccus viridis. The fungus caused<br />

73.1 per cent mortality of the pest when applied at 1.6 x 10 6 spores per ml twice at an interval<br />

of two weeks. The maximum mortality of 97.6 per cent was obtained when the surfactant,<br />

tween 20 was added to the spore suspension. High volume spray was more effective than low<br />

volume. The addition of 0.1 per cent glycerol enhanced the effectiveness of the fungus.


2.8 COMPATIBILITY <strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI WITH<br />

AGROCHEMICALS<br />

Compatibility of entomopathogenic fungi with pesticides used in commercial crop<br />

protection systems is critical, if these fungi are to be utilized for insect control. Since many<br />

fungicides have broad spectra of activity, the suppression of entomopathogenic fungi by<br />

fungicides is of particular concern. Though there are many methods of evaluating fungicidal<br />

activity, most studies of entomopathgenic fungi, have used inhibition of growth in liquid or on<br />

solid media as the primary criterion (Roberts and Campbell, 1977).<br />

Soper et al. (1974) tested the efficacy of fungicides on growth of several species of<br />

entomopathogens in agar media and found that all were inhibitory. Growth of B. bassiana, a<br />

member of the moniliales and pathogen of several insect pests was inhibited by fungicide in<br />

solid and in liquid media.<br />

Teddeur (1981) evaluated six fungicides against the entomopathogenic fungi<br />

Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuilemin and Metarhizium anisopliae, both of which attack the<br />

pecan weevil, Curulio caryae. Triphenyltin hydroxide was the most toxic fungicide to both<br />

pathogens, followed by benomyl, methyl-1-(butylcarbamoyl)-2-benzimidazolecarbamate,<br />

zineb, zince ethylenebis (dithiocarbamats) and dodine, n-dodecylaquanidine acetate. Sulphur<br />

and denocap were the least toxic.<br />

Four fungicides used commercially for control of foliar diseases of potato were<br />

evaluated in vitro and under field conditions of effects on survival of spores of Beauveria<br />

bassiana, a pathogen of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Mancozeb,<br />

the most detrimental of the fungicides, substantially reduced the survival under any of the<br />

conditions examined (Loria et al., 1983).<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana are both compatible with many<br />

commonly used pesticides and are not toxic to human beings (Burges, 1981). M. anisopliae is<br />

soil borne fungus and infects over 200 hosts indicating a need to evaluate compatibility with<br />

non-targets, with pesticides and natural enemies (Gardner et al., 1998). Most importantly,<br />

entomopathogenic V. lecanii strains have been found non-pathogenic to plants and humans<br />

(Burges, 1981).<br />

Recommended concentrations of insecticides viz., fenitrothion, monocrotophos and<br />

phosphomidon and the fungicides like ziram, foltaf, dithane Z-78, chlorothalonil, captan and<br />

wettable sulphur were found safe to the fungus N. rileyi. Silva et al. (1993) conducted<br />

experiments to evaluate the effect of endosulfan (175 g a.i.), prefenophos (100 g a.i.),<br />

trichlorfon (400 g a.i.) and permethrin (12.5 g a.i.), on sporulation in vitro on SMAY medium.<br />

Sporulation was totally inhibited by profenophos and endosulfan, while trichlorfon reduced the<br />

conidial production. There was no significant difference between permethrin and untreated<br />

control.<br />

Influence of nine insecticides on the natural infection of A. gemmatalis by N. rileyi<br />

were studied by Barbosa et al. (1997). The effects of trichlorfon and chlorpyriphos did not<br />

differ from the untreated control. Baculovirus anticarsia, diflebenzuron, endosulfan,<br />

methamidophos, monocrotophos, methyl parathion and thiodicarb showed similar<br />

performance and caused significant decrease in the percentage of mycosed larvae. Tang and<br />

Hou (1998) evaluated five fungicides, eight insecticides and nine herbicides commonly used<br />

in maize fields, for their inhibition to conidial germination of N. rileyi by paper disc method.<br />

Among them, maneb and propineb (fungicides) were highly inhibitory to the fungus while,<br />

insecticides and herbicides examined did not affect the conidial germination significantly.<br />

Carbendazim was found to be most detrimental to the fungus inhibiting 75.85 per cent<br />

growth, while endosulfan, chlorpyriphos, carbaryl, cypermethrin and neem based insecticides<br />

caused 60.81, 60.25, 37.23, 22.48 and 11.23 per cent growth inhibition, respectively<br />

(Kulkarni, 1999).


Gopalkrishnan and Mohan (2000) tested seven insecticides and seven fungicides<br />

which are commonly used for the control of pests and diseases of tomato for their inhibitory<br />

effect on germination of conidia of N. rilei at three (low, normal and high) concentrations in<br />

vitro. They concluded that, monocrotophos, phosphomedon and dimethoate were safe to the<br />

mycopathogen at all the three concentrations. While quinalphos, carbaryl, endosulfan and<br />

fenvalerate were highly detrimental to the fungus at higher concentration. Among the<br />

fungicides, captafol, zineb, chlorothalonil, fosetyl Al and ziram were safe to the fungus at all<br />

the concentrations evaluated. Captan and sulphur on the other hand, though allowed conidial<br />

germination at low and normal concentrations caused total inhibition at higher concentrations.


III. MATERIAL <strong>AND</strong> METHODS<br />

The present work envisaged the isolation of entomopathogenic fungi from insect<br />

cadavers, their characterization, testing of efficacy against different insect pests, influence of<br />

different nutrient sources and influences of different environmental parameters. Studies were<br />

also made on mass production of chosen fungi, formulation and compatability with certain<br />

pesticides. Additionally the persistence of the fungi in the environment genetic improvement,<br />

efficacy of the strain in the field were attempted. The material used and methods followed are<br />

given herein.<br />

3.1 NATURAL INCIDENCE <strong>OF</strong> MYCOPATHOGENS <strong>AND</strong><br />

COLLECTION <strong>OF</strong> SAMPLES<br />

Extensive and repeated survey for the occurrence of the insect mycopathogens in<br />

northern Karnataka covering different agro-climatic regions of agriculture and forest ecosystem<br />

was made during the cropping season of 2000-01. The number of visits to each<br />

places varied from one to five depending upon the cropping system and host insect<br />

availability. The details of sampling sites, crops and periods of visits are included in Table 5<br />

and Figure 1.<br />

3.2 <strong>ISOLATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> MAINTENANCE <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI<br />

The cadavers of the insects that appeared to be infected by fungi were collected<br />

during survey and brought to the laboratory and pathogens were isolated on specific media.<br />

To isolate the fungi, mycosed insects collected from the fields were surface sterilized with 5<br />

per cent sodium hypochlorite and then rinsed with sterile water several times. In a sterile<br />

Petridish, the diseased specimens were crushed and a small portion of infected part was<br />

transferred to a culture plate containing selective medium and kept under constant<br />

observation for the growth and development of microorganisms. After 5 days of incubation,<br />

the organisms were sub-cultured for purification. Slants of each culture were prepared from<br />

purified culture and microscopic observations such as morphological characters of mycelium<br />

and conidia.<br />

Preliminary identification of fungi was made with the help of the Atlas of<br />

entomopathogenic fungi (Samson et al., 1988). Later, the identity of different tentatively<br />

identified fungal specimens were confirmed at Agarkar Research Institute, Pune<br />

(Maharashtra).<br />

3.2.1 Maintenance of culture<br />

A loopful of inocula from subcultured plates of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii were<br />

transferred to Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) slants and maintained as pure culture. Virulence<br />

was revived by passing through an insect host after 5-6 subculturing.<br />

For laboratory studies, the fungus was cultured on PDA medium. The medium was<br />

sterilized at 15 psi for 30 min in autoclave, poured to sterilized plates, cooled and inoculated<br />

with pure culture of the fungus under aseptic conditions. The plates were then incubated at<br />

room temperature (26±2°C) for ten days. After complete sporulation, conidia from the medium<br />

were harvested by washing them thoroughly with sterilized water containing Tween-80 (0.2%)<br />

for immediate use. Otherwise, spores were harvested with the help of a small sterile metal<br />

spatula. Harvested conidia were air dried under laminar air flow and stored in a small air tight<br />

screw cap vials (10 cm with 2.5 cm diameter) in refrigerator at 4°C before using for further<br />

studies. Colony forming units (cfu) were estimated by plating technique. Suspension of spores<br />

was made using distilled water with Tween-80 (0.2%) and filtered through a double layered<br />

muslin cloth. Spore count was made using a double rolled Neubauer’s haemocytometer after


necessary serial dilutions under phase contrast microscope. From the stock solution, further<br />

dilutions were made to obtain the required concentrations for further studies.<br />

3.3 INSECTICIDAL ACTIVITY <strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae <strong>AND</strong><br />

Verticillium lecanii AGAINST DIFFERENT INSECT PESTS<br />

The fungal spores from SMAY plates were mixed with distilled water and 0.2 per cent<br />

Tween-80 to get the spores suspension. The number of conidia were determined using a<br />

Neubauer haemocytometer. Finally, the spore suspension containing 1 x 10 8 conidia/ml were<br />

obtained for the seven individual isolates (Metarhizium anisopliae (4) and Verticillium lecanii<br />

(3) isolates). The spore suspensions of 1 x 10 8 conidia ml -1 of all isolates were topically<br />

applied on early instar of pest with a chromatography sprayer. Three replications were<br />

maintained and in each replication 20 larvae/nymph were tested. Another set was kept<br />

without addition of spores as negative control. The number of dead larvae was noted down<br />

from fifth day of inoculation. Finally, the per cent mortality of each isolate was computed. The<br />

data were subjected to statistical analysis by DMRT (Duncan’s Multiple Range Test).<br />

3.4 EFFECT <strong>OF</strong> NUTRITION ON THE TOTAL DRY MYCELIAL<br />

PRODUCTION <strong>OF</strong> ENTOMPATHOGENIC FUNGI<br />

The effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources on the development of biomass<br />

of fungi were evaluated by varying different carbon sources in the basic Czapeks medium<br />

with lactose, starch, fructose and dextrose at 1, 2, 3 and 4 per cent. Sources at recommended<br />

dose (3%) in the basal media served as the check. Similarly, different nitrogenous sources<br />

viz., KNO3, NaNO3, (NH4)2SO4, NH4NO3 were evaluated at 0.1, 0.15, 2.0 and 2.5 per cent.<br />

Initially, the fungi were cultured on SMAY plates for two weeks. The conidial<br />

suspension was prepared by shaking conidia from a 5 mm diameter agar plug into a test tube<br />

containing in 10 ml sterile water blank mixed with 0.05 per cent Tween 80. The conidial<br />

suspension was mixed thoroughly by shaking at 80 rpm for 10 min and the concentration of<br />

conidia was determined using haemocytometer. Two hundred micro tube (0.2 ml) aliquot of<br />

the final suspension was inoculated into 250 ml broth containing different sources and levels<br />

of carbon and nitrogen. The flasks were aerated on a shaker at 90 rpm under room<br />

temperature for 8-9 days. After complete mycelial growth, the fungal mat was taken out and<br />

filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper later dried under oven at 60°C for two days and<br />

dry weight was recorded.<br />

3.5 COMPATIBLITY <strong>OF</strong> THE FUNGI WITH PESTICIDE<br />

In vitro studies were under taken to assess compatibility of selected insecticides,<br />

fungicides and weedicides by following the poisoned food technique (Nene and Thapliyal,<br />

1997) and the details of the different pesticides and the concentration used are given below<br />

(Table 2).<br />

The pesticides at required concentration were added to the sterilized SMAY agar and<br />

poured into the petriplates after proper agitation and allowed to solidify. The conidial<br />

suspension of the fungi were prepared by shaking conidial from a 5 mm diameter agar plug<br />

(from a mat of the fungi) into a test tube containing in 10 ml sterile water blank mixed with<br />

0.05 per cent Tween 80. The conidial suspension was mixed thoroughly shaking at 80 rpm for<br />

10 min. Hundred microlitre (0.1 ml) of the suspension was spread on SMAY plates containing<br />

different pesticides and control (no pesticide added). All the plates were incubated at 28±1°C<br />

and a 12:12 light dark regime.


3.6 EVALUATION <strong>OF</strong> FOOD GRAINS FOR MASS PRODUCTION<br />

<strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) <strong>AND</strong> Verticillium lecanii (Vl1)<br />

The crushed grains of sorghum, bajra, navane, maize, rice and wheat with 1 per cent<br />

yeast extract were assessed for their suitability as substrates for mass production of M.<br />

anisopliae and V. lecanii. In addition to grains, agro waste viz., crushed maize cobs, wheat<br />

bran, rice bran, baggase and press mud with and without molasses were also tested. To each<br />

of these substrates, sterile distilled water was added in order to bring the moisture content to<br />

50 per cent. After thorough mixing, the bottles were plugged with cotton and autoclaved at 15<br />

psi and 121°C for 30 minutes. Circular agar discs of 5 mm diameter were taken from the eight<br />

day old fungal culture grown on SMAY plates. One disc was inoculated to each bottle and<br />

mixed with it to disperse the inoculum. The bottles were incubated in BOD incubator at<br />

25±1°C. Four replications were maintained for each treatment. The spores were harvested<br />

from sixth day onwards at definite intervals of upto 25 days by sampling 1 g of the digested<br />

material. The spore suspension of each sample was made by dispersing the inoculum in 10<br />

ml sterile water blank with one drop of 0.02 per cent Tween-80, serially diluted and the spore<br />

count estimated using a haemocytometer.<br />

3.7 GENETIC IMPROVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> STRAINS<br />

The genetic improvement of the fungi was attempted for V. lecanii Vl1 and M.<br />

anisopliae Ma1 through mutagenesis using UV radiation.<br />

3.7.1 Mutation using ultra-violet rays<br />

Seven days old culture was taken and the conidial suspension prepared in sterile<br />

distilled water. The suspension was centrifuged at high speed (10000 rpm) to pellet the<br />

conidia. The conidial pellet was washed in 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7) and re-suspended in<br />

the same buffer. The spore concentration was later adjusted to 10 6 conidia/ml. The spores<br />

were then exposed to UV radiation in Petridish for 20 minutes at different heights from UV<br />

bulb in the UV cabinet. Later, the surviving population was analyzed by plating the<br />

mutagenised culture on SMAY agar. The bank of mutants which had the highest killing<br />

percentage were selected for further studies.<br />

3.8 PERSISTENCE <strong>OF</strong> SPORES <strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium aniospliae<br />

(Ma2) <strong>AND</strong> Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) IN SOIL <strong>AND</strong><br />

PHYLLOPLANE<br />

Survivability of spores in soil and phylloplane in simulated field conditions (in<br />

glasshouse) and field conditions were studied from January 2001 to May 2002. Spores of M.<br />

anisopliae and V. lecanii cultured on PDA plates were mixed with soil @ 4 x 10 6 conidia per g<br />

of dried and sterilized soil and filled in earthen pots. In addition, the same spore load was<br />

sprayed on leaves one set of potted soil with cotton plant of one month old was stored under<br />

shade in the laboratory and the other in cage i.e., open to sunlight and rains, simulating field<br />

situation. Samples were drawn at monthly intervals from individual pots and composite<br />

sample was observed for the presence of viable conidia in soil and phylloplane. Ten gram of<br />

soil sample was suspended in 100 ml sterile water containing 0.02 per cent Tween-80 and<br />

shaken on orbital shaker (120 rpm) for 2 hours. The suspension was sterially diluted and<br />

plated on SMAY medium maintaining four replications per dilution and incubated at room<br />

temperature (26±2°C). Colonies of the fungus formed on the plate were counted after 72 h.


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 2. Details of different pesticides used in the experiments<br />

Common name Trade<br />

name<br />

Group 0.25<br />

R.d<br />

0.5 R.d R.d 2 x R.d<br />

1. Endosulfan 35 EC Endocel Insecticide 0.70ml/l 1.40ml/l 2.80ml/l 5.60ml/l<br />

2. Quinalphos 25 EC Ekalux Insecticide 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l 2.00ml/l 4.00ml/l<br />

3. Monocrotophos 36 Nuvacron Insecticide 0.62ml/l 1.25ml/l 2.50ml/l 5.00ml/l<br />

4. Chlorpyriphos20EC Nuchlor Insecticide 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l 2.00ml/l 4.00ml/l<br />

5. Oxydemeton methyl<br />

25 EC<br />

Metasystox Insecticide 0.35ml/l 0.70ml/l 1.40ml/l 2.80ml/l<br />

6. Dichlorvos 78 SL Nuvan Insecticide 0.12ml/l 0.25ml/l 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l<br />

7. Dicofol 20 EC Kelthane Insecticide 0.72ml/l 1.45ml/l 2.50ml/l 5.00ml/l<br />

8. Malathion 50 EC Malathion Insecticide 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l 2.00ml/l 4.00ml/l<br />

9. Dimethoate 30 EC Rogar Insecticide 4.25ml/l 8.50ml/l 1.70ml/l 3.40ml/l<br />

10. Carbendazim 50WP Bavistin Fungicide 0.25g/l 0.50g/l 1.00g/l 2.00g/l<br />

11. Iprodione Rovrel Fungicide 0.62ml/l 1.25ml/l 2.50ml/l 5.00ml/l<br />

12. Chlorothalonil75WP Kavach Fungicide 0.50g/l 1.00g/l 2.00g/l 4.00g/l<br />

13. Propiconazole25WP Tilt Fungicide 0.25ml/l 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l 2.00ml/l<br />

14. Mancozeb 75 WP Indofil M-<br />

45<br />

Fungicide 0.50g/l 1.00g/l 2.00g/l 4.00g/l<br />

15. Triadimefon 25 WP Bayleton Fungicide 0.25g/l 0.50g/l 1.00g/l 2.00g/l<br />

16. Hexaconazole Contaf Fungicide 0.25ml/l 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l 2.00ml/l<br />

17. Wettable sulfer 80% Thiovit Fungicide 1.37g/l 2.75g/l 5.50g/l 11.0g/l<br />

18. Oxyflurfon Goal Weedicide 0.12ml/l 0.25ml/l 0.50ml/l 1.00ml/l<br />

19. Pendimethalin30EC Stamp Weedicide 2.00ml/l 4.00ml/l 8.00ml/l 16.0ml/l<br />

20. Attrazine 50% Atratof Weedicide 0.33g/l 0.66g/l 1.33g/l 2.66g/l<br />

21. Butahclor 5% Machete Weedicide 11.0g/l 22.0g/l 4.00g/l 8.80g/l<br />

22. Fluchloralin 45 EC Basalin Weedicide 0.66ml/l 1.33ml/l 2.67ml/l 5.34ml/l<br />

23. Glyphosate 41 SL Roundup Weedicide 1.45ml/l 2.50ml/l 5.00ml/l 10.0ml/l<br />

24. Alachlor 50 EC Lasso Weedicide 0.69ml/l 1.39ml/l 2.78ml/l 5.56ml/l<br />

R.d.: Recommended dose


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 3. Details of food grains evaluated for mass production of<br />

Metarhizium anisoplia and Verticillium lecanii<br />

Common name Botanical name Plant part<br />

1. Sorghum Sorghum vulgare Pers Grain<br />

2. Rice Oryza sativa L. Grain<br />

3. Bajra (pearl millet) Pennisetum typhoides L. Grain<br />

4. Navane Setaria italica Beauv. Grain<br />

5. Maize Zea mays L. Grain, cobs<br />

6. Wheat Triticum aestivum L. Grain<br />

7. Sugarcane Saccaharum officinarum L. Leaves<br />

A) Oil<br />

Table 4. Details of carrier materials evaluated for survival studies<br />

Formulation Concentration<br />

1. Groundnut<br />

2. Mustard<br />

3. Sunflower<br />

B) Wettable powder<br />

1. Wheat flour<br />

2. Sorghum flour<br />

75% spore preparation +<br />

25% oil<br />

50% spore preparation +<br />

50% oil<br />

75% spore preparation +<br />

25% oil<br />

50% spore preparation +<br />

50% oil<br />

WP/Oil<br />

0.5 ml<br />

1.0 ml<br />

2.5 g<br />

5.0 g<br />

Dosage<br />

Spore<br />

preparation<br />

1.5 g<br />

1.0 g<br />

7.5 g<br />

5.0 g


3.9 EVALUATION <strong>OF</strong> DIFFERENT FORMULATIONS <strong>AND</strong><br />

STORAGE METHODS<br />

Spores of M. anisopliae (Ma2) and V. lecanii (Vl1) were harvested from sorghum<br />

grains and air dried. The carrier materials initially selected in the present study are given in<br />

the Table 4.<br />

The selected oils and flour were initially sterilized in stabs and sterilizable plastic<br />

covers respectively. Further, inoculum (spore preparation) of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii<br />

were thoroughly mixed with oils and flour along with 0.1 per cent Tween-80 under sterilized<br />

conditions. After mixing, they were sealed and stored at different temperatures viz.,<br />

refrigerated temperature, room temperature, in earthen pot kept on wet sand and deep<br />

freezer.<br />

The number of viable spores per g or per ml of inoculant material were determined at<br />

0, 20, 45, 75, 90, 120 and 150 days intervals after incubation using standard plate count<br />

method on SMAY media. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 7 to 10 days. Three<br />

replications were maintained for each treatment.<br />

Treatment combinations<br />

1. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut oil<br />

2. 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent groundnut oil<br />

3. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent mustard oil<br />

4. 75 per cent conidia + 50 per cent mustard oil<br />

5. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil<br />

6. 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower oil<br />

7. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent wheat oil<br />

8. 75 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat oil<br />

9. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum oil<br />

10. 75 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sorghum oil<br />

3.10 FIELD EFFICACY <strong>OF</strong> Verticillium lecanii AGAINST APHIDS<br />

(Aphis craccivora and Brevicornia brassicae)<br />

Field experiments were conducted during kharif 2001 to evaluate the comparative<br />

performance of the V. lecanii in cowpea ecosystem against aphids (Aphis craccivora) and<br />

cabbage aphid (Brevicornia brassicae). The experiment was conducted at the Main<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad and the crop was sown on June 20 th in case of<br />

cowpea. The experiment in cabbage ecosystem on aphids (Brevicornia brassicae) was<br />

conducted on farmer’s field of Madihal area of Dharwad and. The crop was sown on 19 th<br />

September 2001. The crop was raised following the recommended agronomic practices in<br />

200 m² blocks. For recording observations on the incidence of the mycopathogen, each<br />

treatment block was divided into four quadrants (replications) in case of cowpea and<br />

cabbage. The treatments were randomized completely and plants were tagged with waxed<br />

labels. Observations on the number of the insect infection were recorded on randomly<br />

selected 10 leaves per plant, a day before, 3, 7 and 14 days after imposing the treatments.<br />

3.11 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS<br />

The data obtained from the laboratory and field experiments were statistically<br />

analysed following standard procedures (Gomez and Gomez, 1984). Percentage values were<br />

transformed to arc sin values while, root transformation (√x + 0.5) was followed for larval or<br />

nymphal counts (both total and mycosed) wherever necessary. The data collected were<br />

subjected to pooled analysis of variance. Means were separated by DMRT.


IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS<br />

4.1 EXPLORATION <strong>OF</strong> THE NATURAL OCCURRENCE <strong>OF</strong><br />

INSECT MYCOPATHOGENS IN DIFFERENT ECOLOGICAL<br />

NICHES IN NORTHERN KARNATAKA<br />

Intensive and repeated survey for the occurrence of the insect mycopathogens in the<br />

northern districts of Karnataka covering different agro climate region of agricultural and forest<br />

eco-systems were made during the cropping season of 2000-01. The number of visits to each<br />

locality varied from one to five depending upon cropping system and host insect availability.<br />

The details of places, crops and periods of visits, mycopathogens and the average disease<br />

incidence of different fungi are presented in Table 5. The natural occurrence of different<br />

pathogens in Karnataka state has also been mapped in the first year (Fig. 1). Among them,<br />

Nomuraea rileyi was predominant organism followed by Metarhizium anisopliae, Beauveria<br />

bassiana, Verticillium lecanii, Cladosporium spp., Aspergillus candidus and Fusarium spp.<br />

The survey revealed the prevalence of disease caused by Nomuraea rileyi on Helicoverpa<br />

armigera, Spodoptera litura and Thysonoplusia orichalcea in different crop habitats at<br />

Dharwad, Hubli and Navalgund taluks of Dharwad district, Ron taluka of Gadag district,<br />

Belgaum, Gokak, Bailhongal and Saundatti taluks of Belgaum district. Incidence of N. rileyi on<br />

the Lepidoptera hosts to an extent of 88 per cent in soybean at Devalpur in Bailhongal taluka<br />

of Belgaum district were witnessed during August. Mycosis of S. litura to the tune of 36 per<br />

cent was recorded on blackgram grown on the bunds of paddy fields at Siraguppa during<br />

November 2000. On the same pest, ten per cent disease incidence was noticed in irrigated<br />

groundnut at Raichur during January and February.<br />

The prevalence of M. anisopliae was noticed on diamond backmoth at Hirebagewadi<br />

(Belgaum), coconut rhinoceros at Dharwad, brown plant hopper at Tungabhadra project area<br />

(Gangavati). The natural incidence of disease caused by M. anisopliae on this insect<br />

population was however meagre (0.5 to 3.5%).<br />

Verticillium lecanii prevailed only in Haveri and Uttara Kannada districts. The fungus<br />

had colonised jasmine aphid and teak skeletonizer.<br />

During the survey, the occurrence of B. bassiana was noticed on brown plant hopper<br />

in the Tungabadra project (TBP) area on ash weevil at Bailhongal, Belgaum district and red<br />

palm weevil at Bailhongal, Belgaum district and red palm weevil at Sirsi. The other<br />

mycopathogen of insect pests collected during survey were Cladosporium oxysporum on<br />

cotton, leafhopper in Dharwad and Bailhongal, Cladosporum cladosporides on castor<br />

leafhopper, teak skelitonizer and cotton whitefly, whereas 5-19 per cent incidence of C.<br />

sphaerospermum on Ligeid bug in Dharwad, Bailhongal and Bidar.<br />

Fusarium oxysporum was recorded only on homopterans in Raichur, Haveri and Uttar<br />

Kannada districts in paddy, cotton and forest ecosystem. The incidence was highest (12.39%)<br />

on A. gossypii followed by N. lugens (5.62%) and least (2.39%) on mealy bug. A small<br />

population of cotton aphids (3.89%) was mycosed by Aspergillus candidus in Dharwad district<br />

only.<br />

4.1.1 Isolation<br />

The cadavers of insects collected during survey were brought to the laboratory and<br />

the fungi isolated on Sabouruds Maltose Agar Medium fortified with 1 per cent Yeast Extract<br />

(SMAY).


Fig. 1. Mycopathogens of insect pests collected during<br />

survey in Northern Karnataka


Table 5. Details of intensive survey conducted for incidence of entomopathogenic fungi in northern Karnataka<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

September Bidar district<br />

a. Anadurwadi, Anadur, Janawad,<br />

Markal, Hallhalli, Dannur<br />

Sugarcane, Pigeonpea, Soybean,<br />

Sunnhemp, Groundnut, Sunflower,<br />

Paddy, Sorghum<br />

Sorghum, Pigeonpea, Sugarcane,<br />

Cabbage, Niger, Horsegram<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Crop Pest Causal agent<br />

Sunnhemp Ragmus<br />

importunitus<br />

Cladosporium<br />

sphaerospermum<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

b. Hallikhed (K), Humanabad,<br />

Dubalagundi, Hallikhed (B)<br />

- - - -<br />

c. Bhalki, Dhadgi Sorghum, Pigeonpea, Field Bean - - - -<br />

September, Gulbarga district<br />

November a. Kamalapur, Muttaragi,<br />

Pigeonpea, Bajra Niger,<br />

- - - -<br />

Gulbarga, Farhatabad,<br />

Firajabad<br />

Groundnut<br />

b. Chincholi, Bhemnal, Sonth,<br />

Narnal, Chimmanchol<br />

Pigeonpea, Bajra - - - -<br />

c. Yadgir, Gurumatkal, malkod,<br />

Mulkund, Aadke, Konagadda<br />

Pigeonpea, Bajra, Groundnut - - - -<br />

October Bijapur district<br />

a. Basavanabagewadi, Hunnigeri, Groundnut, Sunflower, Cotton,<br />

- - - -<br />

Manguli, Tikota<br />

Groundnut, Madiki, Niger, Grape,<br />

Pomegranate<br />

September Raichur district<br />

a. Sindhanoor, K. hosahalli, Paddy, Bajra, Sunflower Paddy Nilaparvata lugens Fusarium 5.38<br />

Gunjahalli<br />

oxysporum<br />

September, b. Yaragera, Jambaldini,<br />

Paddy, Castor, Cotton, Pigeonpea, Groundnut Aproerima Metarhizium 5.64<br />

October, Lingakandoddi, Potagal,<br />

Sunflower, Groundnut<br />

modisella Devanter anisopliae<br />

December Palakambdoddi, Kallur, Eklaspur,<br />

Gilsugur, yariginal, Yadlapur,<br />

Bichhalli<br />

February c. Lingakandoddi, rajalbanda Groundnut, Chickpea Irrigated<br />

groundnut<br />

S. litura N. rileyi 10.00<br />

October, March<br />

- : no incidence<br />

d. Manvi, Neermanvi Groundnut, Paddy Paddy N. lugens F. oxysporum 3.29<br />

5.00


Table 5. Contd…..<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

September Koppal district<br />

a. Ginigera, Hitnal, Munirabad Groundnut, Sugarcane, Paddy,<br />

b. Kustagi, Kalmanagi, Tavargeri,<br />

Mannapur, Chikkanandihal<br />

Pigeonpea, Setaria, Maize, Brinjal<br />

Paddy, Sunflower, Pigeonpea,<br />

Bajra, Groundnut, Sorghum,<br />

Sesamum, Maize, Pundi<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Crop Pest Causal agent<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

c. Yalaburga, Banapur Groundnut - - - -<br />

d. Gangavati, Marali, Sirampur,<br />

Karatagi<br />

Paddy, Sunflower Paddy N. lugens F. lateritium,<br />

M. anisopliae,<br />

B. bassiana<br />

July<br />

Bellary district<br />

a. Hadagali, Holalu, Mailar Cotton, Groundnut - - - -<br />

September b. Kasanakandi, Hospet,<br />

Pigeonpea, Sorghum, Cotton,<br />

- - - -<br />

Kurkuppa, Torangal, Kundatini,<br />

Bairapur<br />

Cabbage, Tomato, Paddy<br />

September c. Bellary, Bellant, Koluru, Bairapur - - - -<br />

October d. Hirehal, Nagasamudra,<br />

Siruguppa<br />

Groundnut, Horsegram - - - -<br />

October e. Siruguppa Sunflower, Paddy, Blackgram Blackgram S. litura N. rileyi 7.82<br />

November f. Sasmari camp, Tekkalkote<br />

Bagalkot district<br />

Blackgram Paddy Blackgram S. litura N. rileyi 36.36, 35.71<br />

August a. Mudhol, Sameerwadi,<br />

Mahalingpur, Belavadi, Vijramatti,<br />

Lokapur<br />

Sugarcane, Cotton, Maize - - - -<br />

October b.Badami, Maradi, Eihole,<br />

Amingadha<br />

Pigeonpea, Bajra, Sugarcane - - - -<br />

October c.Hungunda, Kudalasangama,<br />

Alimatti<br />

Gadag district<br />

Sugarcane, Sunflower, Pigeonpea - - - -<br />

July Gadag Greengram, Pigeonpea - - - -<br />

September Gadag Greengram, Sunflower, Groundnut - - - -<br />

October Gadag Groundnut, Sunflower Groundnut T. orichalcea N. rileyi 16.67<br />

March<br />

- : no incidence<br />

Lakkundi Chrysanthemum, Tomato,<br />

Ridgegaurd<br />

- - - -<br />

5.36<br />

3.62<br />

2.45


Table 5. Contd…..<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

Crop Pest Causal agent<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

September Ron Groundnut, Pigeonpea, Bajra,<br />

Tomato<br />

- - - -<br />

September Gajendragad<br />

Dharwad district<br />

Groundnut, Pigeonpea, Bajra,<br />

Tomato<br />

Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 10.00<br />

August, a. Dharwad Groundnut, Soybean, Cotton, Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 34.44<br />

September,<br />

Stylosanthus, Sorghum,<br />

T. orichelcea N. rileyi 35.33<br />

October,<br />

Sunflower, Niger, Chilli, Potato,<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 26.57<br />

November<br />

Cabbage, Lucerne, Sunnhemp, Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 25.40<br />

Pigeonpea, Chickpea Etc.<br />

T. orichelcea N. rileyi 18.38<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 20.57<br />

Sunflower S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 14.29<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 31.43<br />

Cotton H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

9.69<br />

Aphis gossypi Aspergillus<br />

candidus<br />

3.89<br />

Amrasca devastans Cladosporium 5.63<br />

Bemisia tabaci oxysporium<br />

C. caldosporioides 1.32<br />

Sorghum H. armigera N. rileyi 25.91<br />

Potato S. litura N. rileyi 5.83<br />

Lucerne S. litura N. rileyi 4.76<br />

Greengram H. armigera N. rileyi 5.61<br />

Stylosanthes T. orichelcea N. rileyi<br />

7.54<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 11.11<br />

Sunhemp T. orichelcia<br />

N. rileyi<br />

6.67<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 41.17<br />

R. importunitus<br />

C.<br />

spharospermum<br />

18.58<br />

Castor E. flavescens C. cladosporioides 10.11<br />

Chickpea H. armigera N. rileyi 12.47<br />

FYM pits Oryctus rhinoceros M. anisopliae 0.56<br />

August, Belur Groundnut, Soybean, Pigeonpea, Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 21.08<br />

September<br />

- : no incidence<br />

Cowpea, Mustard


Table 5. Contd…..<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

Crop Pest<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Causal agent<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

Tegur Mustard, Soybean, Paddy,<br />

Stylosanthes<br />

Stylosanthes T. orichalcea N. rileyi 26.73<br />

Bachanaki Cabbage - - - -<br />

Kaulageri Groundnut, Chilli, Niger, Greengram Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

14.29<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

11.11<br />

Niger<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

18.31<br />

Aminabhavi Cotton, Sunflower Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 16.31<br />

Timmapur Groundnut, Soybean Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 22.44<br />

Kardigudda Niger, Sybean, Potato, Sesamum,<br />

Chrysanthemum<br />

Potato S. litura N. rileyi 20.99<br />

Garag Groundnut, Soybean, Potato Soybean<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

30.43<br />

T. orichalcea<br />

N. rileyi<br />

27.27<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

25.00<br />

Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

32.14<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

23.89<br />

Hebballi, Hebsur Cotton, Groundnut, Soybean,<br />

Cotton H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

26.72<br />

Greengram, Sorghum<br />

Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

18.31<br />

Soybean<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

21.69<br />

October Salikinkop Cotton, Pigeonpea, Sorghum Sorghum H. armigera N. rileyi 18.31<br />

Mummigatti, Belur Cotton, Stylosanthes Stylosanthes H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

33.33<br />

T. orcihalcea<br />

N. rileyi<br />

77.78<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

80.00<br />

December b. Hebballi, Govankop, Hebsur Cotton - - - -<br />

January c. Garag, Tadkod, Hubli Cotton, Chickpea - - - -<br />

August d. Sherewad Groundnut Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 31.63<br />

Palikoppa Soybean, Groundnut Soybean T. orchichalcea N. rileyi<br />

18.31<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

21.63<br />

September e. Hubli, Kusugal Groundnut, Soybean, Sorghum, Groundnut H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

46.67<br />

Cotton<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

30.00<br />

Palikoppa Groundnut, Sorghum, Cotton Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

15.32<br />

Sorghum H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

12.31<br />

Cotton H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

13.61<br />

f. Kalghatagi, Devikop, Tambur, Paddy, Groundnut, Forest System, Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

20.61<br />

Benkikonda<br />

Cotton<br />

Cotton T. orichalcea<br />

N. rileyi<br />

11.32<br />

- : no incidence<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

8.61


Table 5. Contd…..<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

Crop Pest Causal agent<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

g. Navalgund Groundnut - - - -<br />

July h. Annigeri Chilli, Onion, Groundnut Groundnut H. armigera N. rileyi 9.09<br />

September, i. Nalavadi Groundnut, Sorghum Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 23.33<br />

October<br />

Belgaum district<br />

Sorghum H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

8.67<br />

August, a. Bailhongal, M. K. Hubli Tomato, Sugarcane, Soybean, Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 13.19<br />

September<br />

Bell Pepper, Mango<br />

T. orichalcea N. rileyi 18.61<br />

Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 19.61<br />

Nayanagar - Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 75.00<br />

Cotton H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 25.00<br />

Yedalli - Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 83.87<br />

T. orichalcea N. rileyi 82.60<br />

Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 50.00<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 40.00<br />

Cotton H. armigera N. rileyi 40.00<br />

Neginhal Cotton, Groundnut, Soybean, Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 66.67<br />

Potato<br />

H. armigera<br />

Holihosur Cotton, Soybean Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 22.45<br />

Cotton H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 14.29<br />

January Nayanagar, Devalapur, Bailhongal Chickpea, Sorghum, Safflower - - - -<br />

August Hirebagewadi Cotton, Groundnut, Cowpea,<br />

Cabbage<br />

Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 25.45<br />

September Pariswad Groundnut, Cotton Soybean Cabbage P. xylostella M. anisopliae 6.30<br />

October Belgaum Groundnut, Paddy Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 25.45<br />

Soybean H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 18.63<br />

Potato<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 31.02<br />

Hattargi Groundnut, Pigeonpea, Bhendi Groundnut H. armigera N. rileyi 14.29<br />

Sutagatti Sugarcane, Maize, Groundnut - - - -<br />

Chunchwad Paddy - - - -<br />

Jalikoppa Cotton, Soybean Cotton H. armigera N. rileyi 11.61<br />

Belavadi Soybean, Potato Potato<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 21.63<br />

- : no incidence<br />

Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 16.92


Table 5. Contd…..<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

Crop Pest Causal agent<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

Bailhongal Soybean, Groundnut, Sunnhemp Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 20.00<br />

Cotton<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 28.31<br />

Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 16.67<br />

Cotton H. armigera N. rileyi 9.12<br />

Myllocerus<br />

undecimpunctatus<br />

B. bassiana 1.26<br />

A. devastans C. oxysporum 5.31<br />

Sunhemp R. importunitus C.<br />

saperherospermu<br />

10.63<br />

Devalapur Soybean, Groundnut, Cotton, Soybean H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 33.33<br />

Greengram, Sugarcane<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 44.44<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 37.50<br />

Plusia sp.<br />

N. rileyi 25.00<br />

Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 44.44<br />

Cotton H. armigera N. rileyi 11.11<br />

Greengram H. armigera N. rileyi 50.00<br />

September Sogal Groundnut, Soybean, Cotton Groundnut S. litura N. rileyi 27.25<br />

Devalapur Groundnut, Soybean, Cotton Groundnut S. litura, H.<br />

armigera<br />

N. rileyi 54.65<br />

Soybean S. litura,<br />

N. rileyi 88.21<br />

T. orichalcea N. rileyi 80.31<br />

Cotton H. armigera N. rileyi 37.78<br />

Khanapur Groundnut - - - -<br />

Nandagad Paddy, Sugarcane - - - -<br />

Khairavadahatti Paddy - - - -<br />

October Athani, Telsaga, daisayiratti, Groundnut, Pigeonpea, Turmeric, - - - -<br />

Muragundi, Kagawad<br />

Chilli, Sugarcane<br />

October Raibag, Ankali Chilli, Sugarcane, Soybean, Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 23.01<br />

Groundnut<br />

groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 18.61<br />

T. orichalcea sN. rileyi 20.61<br />

August Hukkeri, Sankeshwar Sugarcane, Groundnut, Soybean, Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi 21.07<br />

Sorghum<br />

Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

5.81<br />

- : no incidence<br />

Sorghum H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi 28.02


Table 5. Contd…..<br />

Month/s visited Localities Crops Surveyed<br />

Crop Pest<br />

Mycosis noticed<br />

Causal agent<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

Nippani Tobacco, Groundnut, Soybean Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

23.07<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

27.02<br />

Soybean S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

24.07<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

20.02<br />

September Ramdurga, Shirsangi, Betkurki - - - - -<br />

Gokak, Yaragtti, Arabhavi Soybean Soybean S. litura N. rileyi 7.58<br />

August Savadatti, Hirebagewadi<br />

September Munvalli, Holi, Murgod, Katkol Maize, Groundnut, Soybean,<br />

Soybean,<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

7.31<br />

Haveri district<br />

Greengram<br />

greengram H. amirgera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

5.31<br />

July September a. Shiggaon<br />

Cottons, Chilli, Groundnut Soybean, Cotton H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

9.52<br />

Tadas<br />

Groundnut, Cotton<br />

Cotton Aphis gossypii F. oxysporum 12.39<br />

Shiggaon<br />

Greengram, Groundnut<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

b. Savanur<br />

Uttar Kannada district<br />

Jasmine Jasmine Aphids V. lecanii 6.86<br />

October a) Yellapur - Kiravatti Cotton, Paddy - - - -<br />

November Yellapur, manchikeri, Chavati Forest Eco-System Teak Teak skelitoniiser V. lecanii<br />

2.31<br />

M. anisopliae 2.50<br />

Teak skelitoniiser C. cladosporides 0.81<br />

November b. Sirsi - Bairumbe Forest Ecosystem Forest<br />

ecosystem<br />

Ants and Mealy bug F. oxysporium 2.39<br />

January Sirsi, Yadalli, Kansur Arecanut, Banana, Coconut Coconut Rhyncophorus<br />

ferrugineus<br />

B. bassiana 5.64<br />

c. Siddapur, thyagali, Kholse,<br />

Siddapur, Mavingudi<br />

Paddy, Plantation, Forest System - - - -<br />

November, d. Honnavar, Gerasoppa, Upponi, Forest Ecosystem, Arecanut, Paddy, - - - -<br />

January, March,<br />

April<br />

Hadinbal, Karki<br />

Groundnut<br />

November, e. Kumta – Bettageri, dhareshwar, Arecanut plantation, Paddy,<br />

Groundnut H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

10.12<br />

January, March,<br />

April<br />

Deevagi, bada, Aghanashini, Hegde Groundnut<br />

S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

15.18<br />

November, f. Ankoka – Belse, Antravalli, Paddy, Groundnut Groundnut S. litura<br />

N. rileyi<br />

12.18<br />

January, March Karuvinkoppa, Hebbul, Hattikeri,<br />

Balekeri, bargi<br />

H. armigera<br />

N. rileyi<br />

9.23<br />

g. Haliyal – sambrani, Murkwad, Paddy, Cotton, Sugarcane, Forest<br />

- : no incidence<br />

Bagavati, Neelavani<br />

Ecosystem


Totally eight isolates of N. rileyi, four of Metarhizium anisopliae, three of Verticillium<br />

lecanii, B. bassiana, C. sphaerospermum, Fusarium oxysporum, two of C. oxysporum and<br />

each one of Aspergillus candidus and Fusarium lateritium. They were identified based on their<br />

colony characteristics and microscopic examination (Table 6 and Plate 1). Further, the identity<br />

of the fungi was confirmed at Agarkar Research Institute, Pune (Appendix III).<br />

4.2 MORPHOLOGICAL <strong>AND</strong> CULTURAL CHARACTERISTIC <strong>OF</strong><br />

THE FUNGAL ISOLATES<br />

4.2.1 Colony characteristics<br />

The conidiophores of M. anisopliae appeared in compact to nearly stomatic patches,<br />

mononematous, conidiogenous cells with phialides in whorls, often arranged in a candle like<br />

fashion, clavate to cylindrical and conidia were single celled, hyaline, slightly coloured and<br />

forming long chain often aggregated into prismatic columns. The conidiophores of V. lecanii<br />

was erect and verticillate with loose whorls of phialidic conidiogenous cells. Phialides mostly<br />

awl-shaped and sometimes slightly inflated at the base. Conidia were single celled, hyaline,<br />

smooth walled and produced in slimy heads.<br />

Morphologically, all the isolates exhibited typical Metarhizium and Verticillium<br />

characteristics. Ma1 isolate from rhinoceros grub showed slight yellowish pigment with green<br />

coloured conidia. Ma2 isolated from brown plant hopper produced dark green coloured<br />

conidia with no pigmentation. Ma3 isolated from white grub showed green coloured conidia<br />

and Ma4 isolated from coffee berry borer produced yellowish pigment with green coloured<br />

conidia. In case of V. lecanii Vl3 alone, showed pinkish pigment with white coloured conidia.<br />

Morphological characters of all the M. anisopliae isolates revealed differences with<br />

respect to hyphal and conidial characters except in size of conidia. There was variation in<br />

conidial colour and pigmentation between the isolates. Ma2 produced dark green coloured<br />

spores, while the other three isolates produced green colured spores (Plate 2). Ma3 and Ma4<br />

required 5-6 days to initiate sporulation (Table 7). Ma1 and Ma2 accomplished this in half of<br />

the time.<br />

The hyphal and conidial characters did not vary among the isolates collected from<br />

different localities during survey. However, V. lecanii exhibited significant variation in number<br />

of days for sporulation, colony diameter, sporulation, spore yield and time taken to cover the<br />

given diet for mass production (Table 7).<br />

Among V. lecanii isolates, Vl1 from aphid recorded least spore yield (4.21 x 10 9 ) and<br />

took minimum time (9 days) to cover the entire diet, whereas Vl2 and Vl3 isolates isolated<br />

from teak skelitonizer and citrus scale respectively showed spore yield (4.34 x 10 9 to 4.98 x<br />

10 9 /g) and took maximum time (10 days to 14 days) to cover the entire diet.<br />

4.3 PATHOGENICITY <strong>OF</strong> Verticillium lecanii <strong>AND</strong> Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae AGAINST IMPORTANT PESTS<br />

The culture of insects (American bollworm and Rhinocerous beetle for Metarizhium<br />

and aphids, whitefly and mites for Verticillium) were raised from field collected insect<br />

populations on natural diet. The routine surface sterilization of rearing containers and eggs<br />

with 10 per cent formaldehyde was carried out to prevent fungal bacterial and viral<br />

contaminations of the healthy stock. Test insect of uniform age (second/third instar) and<br />

biomass were selected from the laboratory cultures maintained for the purpose to test the<br />

variability of pathogenicity of M. anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1 by Koch postulates. The<br />

pathogen was topically applied @ 1 x 10 8 conidia/l for aerial insects and mixed the conidia<br />

with soil (1 x 10 7 / kg soil) for soil dwelling insects.


Table 6. List of isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium lecanii<br />

obtained during the study<br />

Strain Source Place of collection<br />

Metarhizium anisopiae<br />

Verticilium lecanii<br />

Ma1 Rhinoceros grub Dharwad<br />

Ma2 Brown plant hopper Gangavati (TBP area)<br />

Ma3 Root grub Kasargod<br />

Ma4 Coffee berry borer Chettalli<br />

Vl1 Aphids Savanur<br />

Vl2 Teak skelitonizer Yellapur<br />

Vl3 Citrus scale Chettalli


Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

Vertucillium lecanii<br />

Nomuraea rileyi<br />

Plate 1. Microconidiopore and microconidia of entomopathogens<br />

a. Conidiaphore, b. Conidia


Strain<br />

Table 7. Morphological and cultural characters of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium lecanii isolates<br />

No. of days for<br />

sporulation<br />

Colour of conidia<br />

Ma1 5 Green with slight yellowish<br />

pigmentation<br />

Colony diameter on 10 th<br />

DAI (mm)<br />

Sporulation (x10 9<br />

conidia/plate)<br />

Spore yield per 100g of<br />

diet (rice) (gx10 9 )<br />

Time taken to<br />

cover the diet<br />

(days)<br />

38.60 2.92 8.93 10.30<br />

Ma2 5 Dark green 42.30 3.21 9.32 10.00<br />

Ma3 8 Green 32.30 1.53 5.62 15.60<br />

Ma4 5 Green with yellowish<br />

pigmentation<br />

33.19 1.62 6.03 16.30<br />

Vl1 5 White 52.13 1.41 4.21 9.25<br />

Vl2 5 White 41.10 1.34 4.34 10.10<br />

Vl3 5 White with pinkish<br />

pigmentation<br />

DAI – Days after incubation<br />

28.42 1.58 4.98 14.31


Ma 1 (Dharwad) Ma2 (Dharwad)<br />

Ma 3 (Kasargod) Ma 4 (Chettalli)<br />

Vl1 (Savanur) Vl2 (Yellapur) Vl3 (Chettalli)<br />

Plate 2. In vitro sporulation by different isolates of<br />

Metarhizium anisopliar and<br />

Verticillium lecanii


The pathogenicity of the mycopathogen M. anisopliae Ma2 was tested against two<br />

species (Helicoverpa armigera and Oryctes rhinoceros) (Plate 3) of insect pest and<br />

mycopathogen V. lecanii Vl1 was tested against 5 species of insect pests viz., Brevicornia<br />

brassicae, Aphis crassivora, Melanaphis sacchari, Polyphagotarsonemus latus, Aleurodicus<br />

disperses. The results are presented in Table 8 and Plate 4.<br />

Among the insects tested by V. lecanii Vl1, cabbage aphid B. brassicae was<br />

more susceptible (94.50%) followed by cowpea aphid A. crassivora (84.23%), sorghum<br />

aphid M. sacchari (72.42%) and chilli mite P. latus (55.10%). Spirilling whitefly, A. disperses<br />

recorded lowest mortality of 51.35 per cent. In case of M. anisopliae the maximum mortality<br />

was recorded in Rhinocerous beetle (85.10%) followed by American bollworm (82.00%)<br />

(Plate 5).<br />

The different strains of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii obtained were tested against H.<br />

armigera and B. brassicae. The results are presented in Table 9. The mortality of H. armigera<br />

larvae treated with the different isolates of M. anisopliae showed that Ma2 caused maximum<br />

cumulative mortality (87.50%) followed by Ma-1 (83.21%). The other two isolates Ma1 and<br />

Ma4 caused only 62.28 and 74.81 per cent mortality. Among the different isolates of V. lecanii<br />

tested against Brevicornia brassica, Vl1 recorded maximum mortality of 94.50 per cent<br />

followed by Vl3 (83.50%) and Vl1 (78.32%).<br />

4.4 EFFECT <strong>OF</strong> DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES ON THE<br />

BIOMASS <strong>OF</strong> Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) <strong>AND</strong> Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae (Ma2)<br />

The effect of different carbon sources on the growth of M. anisopliae Ma2 was<br />

evaluated at different concentrations in the Czapecks Dox broth (Table 10). From the results,<br />

it was observed that the total dry matter production was significantly higher on the medium<br />

containing starch (6.01 g/250 ml) followed by sucrose (5.51 g/250 ml) and fructose (4.83<br />

g/250 ml). Lactose supported least growth with only 4.44 g/250 ml of dry matter production.<br />

The interaction effect of carbon source and levels on biomass production of M.<br />

anisopliae was maximum with starch 40 g/l (6.01 g/250 ml). As the concentration of sugar<br />

tested increased from 10 to 40 g/l, mean biomass also increased from 4.14 g/l at 10 g/l to<br />

6.01 g/l at 40 g/l.<br />

Among different nitrogen sources evaluated for production of M. anisopliae, KNO 3<br />

(5.76 g/250 ml) was found to be best source followed by NH4NO3 (5.32 g/250 ml). There was<br />

reduced growth in NaNO3 (4.40 g/250 ml). The optimum concentration of nitrogen was found<br />

to be 2 g/l (5.53) for all nitrogen sources (Table 11).<br />

Various concentrations of carbon and nitrogen source were evaluated against total<br />

dry matter production of V. lecanii. Biomass was marginal (4.219 m) at lower concentration of<br />

carbon source and was highest (4.66 g/250 ml) at the highest concentration (40 g/l) and was<br />

significantly superior to rest of the treatment.<br />

Among the carbon sources tested, the mean per cent biomass with sucrose (5.398<br />

g/250 ml) and starch (5.97 g/250 ml) were on par with each other and significantly superior to<br />

rest of the carbon sources tested (Table 12).<br />

In case of nitrogen sources, the biomass was marginal (4.66 g/ml) at lower<br />

concentration and it was highest at recommended dose of 2 g/l with maximum dry matter<br />

production of 6.70 g/l. However, there was reduction in biomass at highest concentration (2.5<br />

g/l). The maximum biomass was recorded when the medium was supplemented with<br />

(NH4)SO4 (6.77 g) followed by NaNO3 (6.61 g/250 ml) and least with KNO3 (5.51 g/ml) (Table<br />

13).<br />

Among the interaction, the highest biomass of 7.41 g/250 ml was recorded with<br />

(NH4)SO4 and lowest in NaNO3 which supported a total dry matter of 4.23 g/250 ml.


Table 8. Mortality caused by the isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and<br />

Verticillium lecanii against Helicoverpa armigera and Brevicornia<br />

brassicae respectively<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

Verticillium lecanii<br />

Isolates Cumulative per cent mortality<br />

Ma1 83.21 c<br />

Ma2 87.50 b<br />

Ma3 62.28 g<br />

Ma4 74.84 f<br />

Vl1 94.50 a<br />

Vl2 78.32 e<br />

Vl3 83.50 d<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 9. Insect species found susceptible to Metarhizium anisopliae and<br />

Verticillium lecanii<br />

Strain<br />

Insect<br />

Common name Scientific name<br />

Disease<br />

incidence (%)<br />

1. M. anisopliae American bollworm Helicoverpa armigera 82.00<br />

2. M. anisopliae Rhinoceros beetle Oryctes rhinoceros 85.10<br />

3. V. lecanii Cabbage aphid Brevicornia brassicae 94.50<br />

4. V. lecanii Cowpea aphid Aphis crassivora 84.23<br />

5. V. lecanii Sorghum aphid Melanaphis sacchari 72.42<br />

6. V. lecanii Chilli mite Polyphagotarsonemus<br />

latus<br />

55.10<br />

7. V. lecanii Spirilling whitefly Aleurodicus dispersus 51.35


Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Dimond Black Moth<br />

Brown plant hopper Root grub<br />

Plate 3. Host insets of Metarhizium anisopliae


Aphids<br />

Spirilling whitefly<br />

Spirilling whitefly<br />

Plate 4. Host insects of Verticillium lecanii


Plate 5. The moratality of Hlelicoverpa armigera topically applied<br />

with Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

1. Healthy larvae (8 days old larvae)<br />

2. Dead larvae ( 5 days after spore application)<br />

3. Dead larvae with thick fungal mat (7 days after spore application)<br />

4. Dead larvae covered with green coloured with green coloured conidia (10 days<br />

after spore application)


Carbon<br />

source<br />

Table 10. Total biomass production of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) as<br />

influenced by carbon sources<br />

Total dry biomass content (g/ 250 ml)<br />

10 g/lt* 20 g/lt* 30 g/lt* 40 g/lt* Mean<br />

Lactose 4.00 4.47 4.31 5.00 4.44<br />

Starch 4.51 5.60 6.30 7.75 6.01<br />

Fructose 3.81 4.80 5.20 5.52 4.83<br />

Sucrose 4.31 5.72 5.75 6.50 5.57<br />

Dextrose 4.11 4.51 4.56 5.30 4.60<br />

Mean 4.14 5.02 5.20 6.01 5.09<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Carbon) 0.025 0.102<br />

B (Conc.) 0.023 0.091<br />

A x B 0.051 0.204<br />

* Concentration of carbon source in Czapeck dox medium


Table 11. Total biomass production of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) as<br />

influenced by nitrogen sources<br />

Nitrogen<br />

source<br />

Total dry biomass content (g/ 250 ml)<br />

1 g/lt* 1.5 g/lt* 2 g/lt* 2.5 g/lt* Mean<br />

NaNO3 3.95 4.59 5.11 3.97 4.40<br />

KNO3 4.20 6.11 6.41 6.33 5.76<br />

(NH4)SO4 5.45 4.85 5.11 5.15 5.14<br />

NH4NO3 5.09 5.21 5.49 5.52 5.32<br />

Mean 4.67 5.19 5.53 5.24 5.15<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Nitrogen) 0.119 0.497<br />

B (Conc.) 0.119 0.497<br />

A x B 0.238 0.998<br />

* Concentration of nitrogen source in Czapeck dox medium


4.5 EVALUATION <strong>OF</strong> FOOD GRAINS <strong>AND</strong> AGRO WASTES FOR<br />

SPORULATION <strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) <strong>AND</strong> V.<br />

lecanii (Vl1)<br />

4.5.1 Food grains<br />

Different food grains were evaluated for their suitability to support the conidial<br />

production of the mycopathogens based on the time taken to initiate mycelial growth,<br />

sporulation and conidial yield at 6, 8, 15, 20 and 25 days after inoculation (DAI).<br />

In general, the mycelial growth and production of conidia increased with increase in<br />

DAI and by 20 DAI, it covered the surface of the media almost completely. The conidial yield<br />

was influenced significantly by the source of grain at all intervals of observation.<br />

The growth of M. anisopliae was significantly higher on bajra (22.77 x 10 8 conidia/g)<br />

followed by sorghum (11.60 x 10 8 conidia/g), rice (8.4 10 8 conidia/g) and maize (6.76 x 10 8<br />

conidia/g) (Table 14 and Fig. 2). On the other hand, wheat supported least yield 3.22 x 10 8<br />

condiia/g, conidial production increased from 6 th to 20 th day and remained constant further in<br />

all the treatments. The conidial production on the 20 th day was high in bajra (24.90 x 10 8<br />

condia/g), whereas in navane (7.78 x 10 8 conidia/g) and wheat (3.76 x 10 8 conidia/g) grain, as<br />

at the previous interval faired, as poor substrate for fungal productivity.<br />

In case of Verticillium lecanii, rice proved superior by producing significantly higher<br />

spore load (24.59 x 10 8 conidia/g) followed by sorghum (17.49 x 10 8 conidia/g) bajra (10.34 x<br />

10 8 conidia/g). On the other hand, navane supported the least yield (3.52 x 10 8 conidia/g) and<br />

its suitability was no better than wheat (3.54 x 10 8 conidia/g). The conidial load was maximum<br />

after 20 DAI against all the treatments tested (Table 15 and Fig. 2).<br />

4.5.2 Agro waste<br />

In all, five agro wastes (viz., maize cobs, wheat bran, rice bran, baggase and press<br />

mud) singly and along with 10 per cent molasses were evaluated for their suitability as<br />

principle substrate for the mass production of fungal insect pathogens. Among the agro<br />

wastes, rice bran enhanced the productivity of both the fungi compared to other agro wastes.<br />

The conidial mass harvested per gram of dietary grain used, increased steadily with<br />

inoculation of molasses in both the strains.<br />

Among the agro waste tested with Ma-2 (Table 16 and Fig. 3), rice bran + 10 per cent<br />

molasses proved to be superior in producing significantly higher spore load (33.24 x 10 4<br />

conidia/g) followed by wheat bran + 10 per cent molasses (19.03 x 10 4 conidia/g) rice bran<br />

and wheat bran with a spore yield of 12.80 x 10 4 and 10.16 x 10 4 conidia/g, respectively. In<br />

others, the spore count was considerably less. Pressmud + 10 per cent molasses supported<br />

least yield 0.42 x 104 spore/g, where initiation of growth and sporutation resulted only after 20<br />

DAI.<br />

In general, mycelial growth and conidiation increased with increase in DAI upto 20<br />

DAI but significant reduction of conidial yield was observed at 25 DAI in some substrate viz.,<br />

rice bran, rice bran + 10 per cent molasses and in baggasse + 10 per cent molasses.<br />

The growth and sporulation of V. lecanii Vl1 (Table 17 and Fig.3) was found to be<br />

better on rice bran + 10 per cent molasses (30.86 x 10 4 conidia/g) followed by wheat bran +<br />

10 per cent molasses (18.76 x 10 4 conidia/g) and rice bran (15.98 x 10 4 conidia/g). Complete<br />

inhibition of growth and reproduction of the fungus was noticed on bagasse and pressmud<br />

with 1 per cent yeast extract alone. However, growth was recorded when baggasse and<br />

pressmud was supplemented with 10 per cent molasses (10.88 and 7.90 conidia/g<br />

respectively).


Table 12. Total biomass production of Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) as influenced<br />

by carbon sources<br />

Carbon<br />

source<br />

Total dry matter content (gm/ 250 ml)<br />

10 g/lt* 20 g/lt* 30 g/lt* 40 g/lt* Mean<br />

Lactose 3.81 4.71 4.63 5.00 4.53<br />

Starch 4.49 5.29 6.21 7.90 5.97<br />

Fructose 4.05 5.05 5.38 6.09 5.14<br />

Sucrose 4.41 5.25 6.77 7.51 5.98<br />

Dextrose 4.29 4.97 5.96 7.83 5.76<br />

Mean 4.21 5.05 5.79 6.86 5.48<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Carbon) 0.029 0.116<br />

B (Conc.) 0.026 0.104<br />

A x B 0.057 0.232<br />

* Concentration of carbon source in Czapeck dox medium


Table 13. Total biomass production of Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) as influenced<br />

by nitrogen source<br />

Nitrogen<br />

source<br />

Total dry matter content (g/ 250 ml)<br />

1 g/lt* 1.5 g/lt* 2 g/lt* 2.5 g/lt* Mean<br />

NaNO3 4.23 7.37 7.52 7.33 6.61<br />

KNO 3 4.49 6.02 5.81 5.72 5.51<br />

(NH4)SO4 5.22 7.06 7.4 7.41 6.77<br />

NH 4NO 3 4.71 5.20 6.10 6.23 5.56<br />

Mean 4.66 6.41 6.70 6.67 6.11<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Nitrogen) 0.016 0.067<br />

B (Conc.) 0.016 0.067<br />

A x B 0.032 0.134<br />

* Concentration of nitrogen source in Czapeck dox medium


Table 14. Sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae Ma2 spores on different grains<br />

Treatment<br />

No. of spores x 10 8 /g<br />

Days after inoculation<br />

6 8 15 20 25 Mean<br />

Crushed bajra + 1% of YE 17.35 23.10 24.00 24.90 24.50 22.77<br />

Crushed sorghum + 1% of YE 6.110 10.36 13.68 13.92 13.92 11.60<br />

Crushed navane + 1% of YE 2.530 4.15 6.90 7.78 7.78 5.83<br />

Crushed maize + 1% of YE 2.660 5.20 8.41 8.78 8.78 6.76<br />

Crushed rice + 1% of YE 4.090 6.56 10.55 10.55 10.55 8.46<br />

Crushed wheat + 1% of YE 1.905 2.92 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.22<br />

Mean 5.774 8.71 11.22 11.61 1.54 9.77<br />

YE – Yeast extract<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Food grain) 0.037 0.145<br />

B (Days) 0.034 0.132<br />

A x B 0.083 0.323


Table 15. Sporulation of Verticillium lecanii Vl2 spores on different grains<br />

Treatment<br />

No. of spores x 10 8 /g<br />

Days after inoculation<br />

6 8 15 20 25 Mean<br />

Crushed bajra + 1% of YE 14.25 16.66 18.86 18.86 18.86 17.49<br />

Crushed sorghum + 1% of YE 8.37 9.75 10.26 11.66 11.66 10.34<br />

Crushed navane + 1% of YE 2.90 3.10 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.52<br />

Crushed maize + 1% of YE 3.36 4.06 5.15 5.79 5.79 4.80<br />

Crushed rice + 1% of YE 21.35 24.05 25.85 25.85 25.85 24.59<br />

Crushed wheat + 1% of YE 2.07 3.05 4.19 4.19 4.19 3.54<br />

Mean 8.71 10.12 11.36 11.70 11.70 10.72<br />

YE – Yeast extract<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Food grain) 0.011 0.042<br />

B (Days) 0.010 0.038<br />

A x B 0.024 0.094


Mean spore yield x 10 8 /g<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Crushed bajra + 1% of<br />

YE<br />

Crushed sorghum + 1%<br />

of YE<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2)<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Vl2)<br />

Crushed navane + 1% of<br />

YE<br />

Crushed maize + 1% of<br />

YE<br />

Treatments<br />

Crushed rice + 1% of YE Crushed wheat + 1% of<br />

YE<br />

Fig. 2. Conidial yield of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium lecanii on different food grains<br />

Fig. 2. Conidial yield of Metarhizium anisopliae and verticillum lecanii on different food grains


Table 16. Sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae Ma2 spores on different agro wastes<br />

Treatment<br />

No. of spores x 10 4<br />

Days after inoculation<br />

10 15 20 25 Mean<br />

Crushed maize cobs + 1% YE 3.57 3.87 3.87 6.00 4.33<br />

Wheat bran +1% YE 9.25 10.25 10.25 10.90 10.16<br />

Rice bran +1% YE 13.40 15.15 15.15 7.50 12.80<br />

Baggase +1% YE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Press mud + 1% YE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Crushed maize cobs + 10% molasses 8.25 9.4 9.4 10.80 9.46<br />

Wheat bran +10% molasses 15.30 18.30 18.30 24.25 19.03<br />

Rice bran +10% molasses 34.37 38.25 38.25 22.10 33.24<br />

Baggase bran +10% molasses 7.70 9.20 9.20 4.50 7.65<br />

Press mud + 10% molasses 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.425<br />

Mean 9.185 10.442 10.442 9.140 9.803<br />

YE – Yeast extract<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Agro waste) 1.662 0.353<br />

B (Conc.) 1.051 NS<br />

A x B 3.323 NS


Among the non-grain substrates, the fungus took 5 to 8 days to initiate mycelial<br />

growth and 8 to 10 days to produce spores. In general, mycelial growth and conidiation<br />

ncreased with increase in DAI only upto 15 DAI with no further conidiation.<br />

4.6 COMPATIBILITY <strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) <strong>AND</strong><br />

Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) WITH AGROCHEMICALS<br />

The effect of different fungicides, insecticides and weedicides were tested for their<br />

compatibility with M. anisopliae. The effectiveness was measured in terms of conidial<br />

germination of the fungus in vitro using the food poison technique. Inhibition of the conidial<br />

germination over untreated control was worked out for the respective concentration and<br />

analysed for statistical significance. The results are presented in Tables 18 to 23, Fig. 4<br />

and 5.<br />

In general, the results indicated on an average that fungicides were highly inhibitory<br />

and toxic (mean per cent inhibition of 73.65% and 86.45% on M. anisopliae and V. lecanii<br />

respectively) followed by insecticides (44.22% and 53.24%) and weedicides (23.42% and<br />

22.02%).<br />

4.6.1 Fungicides<br />

All the fungicides, tested for their interaction with M. anisopliae inhibited the conidial<br />

germination (19.90 to 100%) considerably (Table 18) at all the four concentrations tested. At<br />

the recommended concentration, the fungicides inhibited the germination of conidia to the<br />

extent of 61.31 to 100 per cent. Propiconazole and mancozeb were highly toxic inhibiting cent<br />

per cent of conidia from germination followed by wettable sulphur (88.35%), carbendazim<br />

(85.60%), chlorothalonil (69.21%) and triadimefon (74.37%). Iprodione was least inhibitory as<br />

it allowed maximum of 38.69 per cent conidia to germinate. The next safe fungicide was<br />

chlorothalonil, which inhibited 69.21 per cent conidial germination. The per cent inhibition of<br />

conidia increased as the dosage increased from 54.46 per cent to 88.94 per cent.<br />

In case of V. lecanii (Table 19), fungicides completely inhibited the conidial<br />

germination considerably at all the four concentrations tested (24.10 to 100%). At the<br />

recommended concentration, the fungicides completely inhibited the germination of condiia to<br />

the extent of 100 per cent in case of carbendazim, chlorothalonil, propiconazole, mancozeb<br />

and wettable sulphur except iprodione and triadimefom as they allowed maximum of 37.38<br />

and 41.62 per cent conidia to germinate respectively.<br />

4.6.2 Insecticides<br />

All the insecticides tested for their interaction with M. anisopliae in general, inhibited<br />

germination of the fungal conidia to the extent of 18.96, 34.10, 49.74 and 74.41 per cent at<br />

low, medium recommended and high dosages respectively.<br />

All the insecticides tested for their effect on M. anisopliae, irrespective of<br />

concentration tested had 34.33 to 55.89 per cent inhibition of conidial germination (Table 20).<br />

Among them, Dichlorvos was significantly detrimental (55.89% inhibition) than all other<br />

insecticides except monocrotophos in which the inhibition of conidia recorded 54.22 per cent.<br />

Conversely, malathion and dimethoate were signficinatly safer (34.33 to 36.99% inhibition),<br />

followed by endosulfan, quinolphos and chlorpyriphos (38.96 to 42.96% inhibition). At the<br />

recommended concentration, the insecticides inhibited the germination of conidia to the<br />

extent of 37.67 to 69.16 per cent (Plate 6).


Table 17. Sporulation of Verticillium lecanii Vl2 spores on agro wastes<br />

Treatment<br />

No. of spores x 10 4<br />

Days after inoculation<br />

10 15 20 25 Mean<br />

Crushed maize cobs + 1% YE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Wheat bran +1% YE 9.9 12.10 12.10 12.10 11.55<br />

Rice bran +1% YE 15.14 16.26 16.26 16.26 15.98<br />

Baggase +1% YE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Press mud + 1% YE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Crushed maize cobs + 10% molasses 9.6 10.24 10.24 10.24 10.07<br />

Wheat bran +10% molasses 17.92 19.05 19.05 19.05 18.76<br />

Rice bran +10% molasses 28.10 31.75 31.75 31.75 30.86<br />

Baggase +10% molasses 8.90 11.55 11.55 11.55 10.88<br />

Press mud + 10% molasses 7.16 8.15 8.15 8.15 7.90<br />

Mean 9.68 10.91 10.91 10.91 10.60<br />

YE – Yeast extract<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Agro waste) 0.032 0.124<br />

B (Days) 0.021 0.078<br />

A x B 0.065 0.248


Mean spore yield x 10 4 /g<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Crushed Wheat bran<br />

maize cobs +<br />

1% YE<br />

+1% YE<br />

Rice bran<br />

+1% YE<br />

Baggase<br />

+1% YE<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2)<br />

Verticillium lecanii (Vl1)<br />

Press mud +<br />

1% YE<br />

Treatments<br />

Crushed<br />

maize cobs +<br />

10%<br />

molasses<br />

Wheat bran<br />

+10%<br />

molasses<br />

Rice bran<br />

+10%<br />

molasses<br />

Baggase<br />

bran +10%<br />

molasses<br />

Fig. 3. Conidial yield of Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillium lecanii on different agrowastes<br />

Fig. 3. Conidial yield of Mearhizium anisopliae and Vericillium lecanii on different agrowastes<br />

Press mud +<br />

10%<br />

molasses


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 18. Effect of fungicides on the conidial germination of<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae Ma2<br />

Fungicides<br />

1. Carbendazim 48.48<br />

(45.60)<br />

2. Iprodione 19.90<br />

(26.49)<br />

3. Chlorothalonil 52.76<br />

(46.58)<br />

4. Propiconazole 100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

5. Manozeb 89.27<br />

(70.87)<br />

6. Triadimefon 28.38<br />

(32.18)<br />

7. Hexaconazole 50.67<br />

(45.38)<br />

8. Wettable sulphur 46.20<br />

(42.82)<br />

Mean 54.50<br />

(49.99)<br />

Inhibition of germination of conidia over control<br />

(%)<br />

0.25 RD 0.5 RD RD 2 RD<br />

55.13<br />

(50.25)<br />

44.53<br />

(41.86)<br />

61.67<br />

(51.74)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

52.36<br />

(46.35)<br />

63.36<br />

(52.75)<br />

69.49<br />

(56.36)<br />

68.32<br />

(59.91)<br />

85.60<br />

(67.70)<br />

61.31<br />

(51.53)<br />

69.21<br />

(56.29)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

74.37<br />

(59.58)<br />

84.40<br />

(66.73)<br />

88.35<br />

(70.06)<br />

82.90<br />

(68.98)<br />

99.48<br />

(86.03)<br />

63.48<br />

(52.81)<br />

72.39<br />

(58.28)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

86.26<br />

(68.25)<br />

94.56<br />

(76.53)<br />

95.32<br />

(17.48)<br />

88.94<br />

(74.92)<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Fungicide) 0.094 0.352<br />

B (conc.) 0.066 0.249<br />

A x B 0.187 0.703<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Mean<br />

72.17 d<br />

(62.40)<br />

47.30 g<br />

(43.17)<br />

64.01 e<br />

(53.22)<br />

100.00 a<br />

(90.00)<br />

97.318 b<br />

(85.21)<br />

60.32 f<br />

(51.59)<br />

73.27 d<br />

(60.35)<br />

74.84 c<br />

(61.68)<br />

73.65<br />

(63.45)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 19. Effect of fungicides on the conidial germination of Verticullium lecanii<br />

Fungicides<br />

1. Carbendazim 100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

2. Iprodione 44.36<br />

(41.78)<br />

3. Chlorothalonil 100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

4. Propiconazole 100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

5. Manozeb 100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

6. Triadimefon 24.103<br />

(29.26)<br />

7. Hexaconazole 53.57<br />

(46.98)<br />

8. Wettable sulphur 86.28<br />

(68.15)<br />

Mean 76.03<br />

(68.27)<br />

Inhibition of germination of conidia over control<br />

(%)<br />

0.25 RD 0.5 RD RD 2 RD<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

48.93<br />

(44.57)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

41.39<br />

(40.13)<br />

86.48<br />

(68.40)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

84.60<br />

(75.38)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

62.62<br />

(52.21)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

58.38<br />

(49.69)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

90.12<br />

(80.23)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

77.47<br />

(61.54)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

82.94<br />

(65.38)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

95.05<br />

(83.36)<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Fungicide) 0.076 0.284<br />

B (Conc.) 0.053 0.201<br />

A x B 0.151 0.567<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Mean<br />

100.00 a<br />

(90.00)<br />

58.34 d<br />

(50.02)<br />

100.00 a<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00 a<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00 a<br />

(90.00)<br />

51.70 e<br />

(46.11)<br />

85.01 c<br />

(73.84)<br />

96.57 b<br />

(84.53)<br />

86.45<br />

(76.81)


Per cent inhibition<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Fungicides Insecticides Weedicides<br />

Low Medium Recommended High<br />

Fig. 4. Effect of pesticides on the conidial germination of Metarihizium anisopliae<br />

Fig. 4. Effect of pesticides on the conidial germination of Metarihizium anisp


Per cent inhibition<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Fungicides Insecticides Weedicides<br />

Low Medium Recommended High<br />

Fig. 5. Effect of pesticides on the conidial germination of Verticillium lecanii<br />

Fig. 5. Effect of pesticides on the conidial germination of Verticillium lecanii


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 20. Effect of insecticides on the conidial germination of Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

Insecticide<br />

1. Endosulfon 13.78<br />

(21.77)<br />

2. Quinolphos 16.77<br />

(24.16)<br />

3. Monocrotophos 28.69<br />

(32.37)<br />

4. Chlorpyriphos 18.31<br />

(25.15)<br />

5. Oxydemeton methyl 25.56<br />

(30.37)<br />

6. Dichlorvos 22.36<br />

(28.22)<br />

7. Dicofol 19.06<br />

(25.89)<br />

8. Malathion 14.74<br />

(22.57)<br />

9. Dimethoate 11.34<br />

(19.67)<br />

Mean 18.96<br />

(25.57)<br />

Inhibition of germination of conidia over control (%)<br />

0.25 RD 0.5 RD RD 2 RD<br />

33.23<br />

(35.20)<br />

34.23<br />

(35.80)<br />

39.14<br />

(38.72)<br />

29.00<br />

(32.58)<br />

38.46<br />

(38.33)<br />

41.73<br />

(40.24)<br />

38.73<br />

(38.46)<br />

28.53<br />

(32.28)<br />

23.90<br />

(29.26)<br />

34.10<br />

(35.65)<br />

44.57<br />

(41.88)<br />

37.67<br />

(37.85)<br />

65.98<br />

(54.30)<br />

49.32<br />

(44.62)<br />

41.93<br />

(40.36)<br />

60.16<br />

(56.15)<br />

54.33<br />

(47.48)<br />

39.13<br />

(38.72)<br />

42.74<br />

(40.82)<br />

49.74<br />

(44.69)<br />

64.25<br />

(53.27)<br />

68.04<br />

(55.57)<br />

83.10<br />

(65.72)<br />

75.21<br />

(60.13)<br />

79.50<br />

(63.08)<br />

90.30<br />

(72.02)<br />

84.37<br />

(66.71)<br />

65.57<br />

(54.07)<br />

59.33<br />

(50.37)<br />

74.41<br />

(60.10)<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Insecticide) 0.153 0.573<br />

B (Conc.) 0.102 0.381<br />

A x B 0.305 1.143<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Mean<br />

38.96 f<br />

(38.03)<br />

39.18 f<br />

(38.35)<br />

54.22 b<br />

(47.78)<br />

42.96 c<br />

(40.62)<br />

46.36 d<br />

(43.03)<br />

55.89 a<br />

(49.16)<br />

49.12 c<br />

(44.63)<br />

36.99 g<br />

(36.91)<br />

34.33 h<br />

(35.03)<br />

44.22<br />

(41.50)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 21. Effect of insecticides on the conidial germination of Verticillium lecanii<br />

Insecticide<br />

1. Endosulfan 14.49<br />

(22.38)*<br />

2. Quinolphos 20.20<br />

(26.70)<br />

3. Monocrotophos 22.33<br />

(28.18)<br />

4. Chlorpyriphos 12.24<br />

(20.49)<br />

5. Oxydemeton methyl 20.40<br />

(26.87)<br />

6. Dichlorvos 15.37<br />

(23.08)<br />

7. Dicofol 23.53<br />

(29.02)<br />

8. Malathion 32.46<br />

(34.73)<br />

9. Dimethoate 16.40<br />

(23.88)<br />

Mean 19.71<br />

(26.15)*<br />

Inhibition of germination of conidia over control (%)<br />

0.25 RD 0.5 RD RD 2 RD<br />

26.15<br />

(30.74)<br />

67.38<br />

(55.18)<br />

47.33<br />

(43.47)<br />

31.51<br />

(34.14)<br />

45.51<br />

(42.42)<br />

25.33<br />

(30.22)<br />

54.25<br />

(47.42)<br />

67.42<br />

(52.22)<br />

30.75<br />

(35.50)<br />

43.74<br />

(41.26)<br />

49.10<br />

(44.48)<br />

79.47<br />

(63.05)<br />

57.28<br />

(49.16)<br />

51.91<br />

(46.09)<br />

62.36<br />

(52.14)<br />

51.04<br />

(45.59)<br />

73.23<br />

(58.84)<br />

81.80<br />

(64.75)<br />

55.57<br />

(48.19)<br />

62.72<br />

(52.48)<br />

59.51<br />

(50.47)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

75.43<br />

(60.28)<br />

81.83<br />

(64.77)<br />

90.25<br />

(71.82)<br />

89.57<br />

(71.15)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

100.00<br />

(90.00)<br />

87.37<br />

(69.18)<br />

87.10<br />

(73.07)<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Insecticide) 0.102 0.384<br />

B (Conc.) 0.068 0.256<br />

A x B 0.205 0.767<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Mean<br />

37.31 i<br />

(3.02)<br />

66.16 b<br />

(58.73)<br />

50.59 e<br />

(45.27)<br />

44.37 h<br />

(41.37)<br />

54.63 d<br />

(48.31)<br />

45.33g<br />

(42.51)<br />

62.75c<br />

(56.32)<br />

69.18a<br />

(60.42)<br />

48.27f<br />

(44.19)<br />

53.24<br />

(48.24)


1. Control<br />

2. 0.25 recommended dose<br />

3. 0.5 recommended dose<br />

4. Recommended dose<br />

5. 2 times recommended dose<br />

Plate 6. Inhibition of growth of Metarhizium<br />

Anisopliar and Verticillium lecanii<br />

by pesticide


Out of nine insecticides, endosulfan, quinolphos, monocrotophos, chlorpyriphos, oxydimeton<br />

methyl, dichlorvas, dicofol, malathion and dimethoate were included to know their effect on V. lecanii<br />

in vitro. Irrespective of concentration, there was 37.31 to 69.18 per cent inhibition of conidial<br />

germination (Table 21). Among them, malathion was significantly detrimental (69.18% inhibition) than<br />

all other insecticides except quinolphos (66.76%). Conversely, endosulfon and chlorpyriphos were<br />

signficinatly safer (37.31 to 44.37%), followed by oxydemeton methyl and dimethoate (45.33 to<br />

48.27% inhibition).<br />

4.6.3 Weedicides<br />

All the weedicides evaluated for their interaction with M. anisopliae in general, inhibited the<br />

germination of the fungal conidia to the extent of 9.01, 16.09, 26.61 and 41.95 per cent at low,<br />

medium recommended and high dosages, respectively (Table 22). However, the effect of all the<br />

weedicides on conidial germination of the mycopathogen was equal irrespective of the concentration<br />

tested. The inhibition ranged from 2.01 to 15.16, 9.80 to 22.41, 15.60 to 34.43 and 29.10 to 59.46 per<br />

cent at low, medium, recommended and higher concentration, respectively.<br />

Weedicides, in general, inhibited the germination of the fungus V. lecanii to the extent of 8.65,<br />

17.46, 25.85 and 36.12 per cent of low (one fourth and half the recommended), recommended and<br />

high (double the recommended) dosage respectively. Variation between the concentration was<br />

evident (Table 23). However, the effect of all the weedicides on conidial germination of the<br />

mycopathogen was equal irrespective of the concentration tested which ranged from 0.73 to 13.07,<br />

7.53 to 22.28, 15.51 to 34.42 and 24.30 to 48.06 per cent at low, recommended and high<br />

concentration, respectively.<br />

4.7 PERSISTENCE <strong>OF</strong> M. anisopliae (Ma2) <strong>AND</strong> V. lecanii (Vl1) ON<br />

PHYLLOPLANE <strong>AND</strong> SOIL<br />

The persistence of M. anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1 were evaluated on the phylloplane<br />

and soil of cotton under in vitro condition. The results are presented in Table 24 and 25.<br />

4.7.1 In soil and phylloplane<br />

Persistence studies of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii on soil and phylloplane were carried out in<br />

field and simulated field conditions over a period of 16 months. Immediately, after inoculation of M.<br />

anisopliae into soil, colony forming units (cfu) ranged from 25.6 x 10 9 to 35.2 x 10 5 per g of soil in field<br />

and simulated field conditions respectively. In the subsequent observations made at monthly interval,<br />

colony counts dropped gradually as the time lag increased (Table 24). The persistence of conidia was<br />

more under simulated field conditions i.e. upto 16 months with 2 x 10 4 cfu per g of soil whereas under<br />

field conditions it persisted only till 5 months. In simulated field condition, slight increase in cfu was<br />

encountered and continued upto declining phase.<br />

Phylloplane treated with aqueous suspension @ 4 x 10 6 conidia indicated that persistence in<br />

field condition and simulated field condition decreased from 1.31 x 10 2 and 1.04 x 10 2 cfu on the initial<br />

day of spray to 0.05 x 10 2 and 0.19 x 10 2 after two months.<br />

Initially under simulated field condition, the colony forming units (cfu) of V. lecanii accounted<br />

for 32.3 x 10 5 in soil and 1.47 x 10 2 on phylloplane. In the subsequent observations after every month,<br />

the colony counts dropped gradually to 2 x 10 4 after 360 days of inoculation in soil, whereas on<br />

phylloplane the mycopathogen, persisted upto 120 day of exposure with 0.02 x 10 2 cfu.<br />

Persistence studies of V. lecanii under field conditions revealed that the mycopathogen<br />

persisted, only for a period of three and two months in soil and phylloplane respectively (Table 25).<br />

The colony counts dropped from 20.3 x 10 9 and 1.29 x 10 2 to 0.2 x 10 2 and 0.14 x 10 2 in soil and<br />

phylloplane respectively.


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 22. Effect of weedicides on the conidial germination of Metarihizium anisopliae<br />

Weedicides<br />

1. Oxyfluron 6.53<br />

(14.80)<br />

2. Pendimethalin 9.36<br />

(17.82)<br />

3. Atrazine 2.01<br />

(8.04)<br />

4. Alachlor 5.77<br />

(13.15)<br />

5. Butachlor 15.16<br />

(23.44)<br />

6. Fluchloralin 13.36<br />

(21.44)<br />

7. Glyphosate 10.56<br />

(18.97)<br />

Mean 9.01<br />

(16.88)<br />

Inhibition of germination of conidia over control (%)<br />

0.25 RD 0.5 RD RD 2 RD<br />

18.00<br />

(25.10)<br />

14.43<br />

(22.32)<br />

9.80<br />

(18.24)<br />

14.30<br />

(21.91)<br />

22.41<br />

(28.24)<br />

19.28<br />

(26.06)<br />

14.43<br />

(22.32)<br />

16.09<br />

(23.46)<br />

34.43<br />

(35.93)<br />

28.33<br />

(32.16)<br />

15.60<br />

(23.23)<br />

19.66<br />

(26.32)<br />

29.67<br />

(33.00)<br />

26.33<br />

(30.87)<br />

32.26<br />

(34.61)<br />

26.61<br />

(30.87)<br />

59.46<br />

(50.47)<br />

36.99<br />

(37.45)<br />

29.10<br />

(32.64)<br />

41.36<br />

(40.03)<br />

31.20<br />

(38.76)<br />

32.43<br />

(34.71)<br />

55.13<br />

(47.94)<br />

41.95<br />

(40.26)<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Weedicide) 0.178 0.672<br />

B (Conc.) 0.135 0.508<br />

A x B 0.356 1.345<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Mean<br />

29.60 a<br />

(31.57)<br />

22.28 d<br />

(27.44)<br />

14.13 f<br />

(20.55)<br />

20.27 e<br />

(25.53)<br />

26.68 c<br />

(30.79)<br />

22.85 d<br />

(28.27)<br />

28.10 b<br />

(30.96)<br />

23.42<br />

(27.87)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 23. Effect of weedicides on the conidial germination of Verticiliium lecanii<br />

Weedicides<br />

1. Oxyfluron 0.73<br />

(4.87)<br />

2. Pendimethalin 21.34<br />

(27.51)<br />

3. Atrazine 1.23<br />

(6.35)<br />

4. Alachlor 13.07<br />

(21.18)<br />

5. Butachlor 11.26<br />

(19.61)<br />

6. Fluchloralin 9.78<br />

(18.18)<br />

7. Glyphosate 3.13<br />

(10.18)<br />

Mean 8.65<br />

(15.41)<br />

Inhibition of germination of conidia over control (%)<br />

0.25 RD 0.5 RD RD 2 RD<br />

18.35<br />

(25.35)<br />

29.07<br />

(32.62)<br />

7.53<br />

(15.93)<br />

22.28<br />

(28.15)<br />

21.40<br />

(27.55)<br />

13.25<br />

(21.33)<br />

10.33<br />

(18.75)<br />

17.46<br />

(24.24)<br />

34.42<br />

(36.07)<br />

31.64<br />

(34.22)<br />

23.06<br />

(28.70)<br />

28.41<br />

(32.20)<br />

29.46<br />

(32.87)<br />

18.46<br />

(25.44)<br />

15.51<br />

(23.18)<br />

25.85<br />

(30.38)<br />

42.36<br />

(40.39)<br />

36.35<br />

(37.00)<br />

30.50<br />

(33.52)<br />

34.87<br />

(36.19)<br />

48.06<br />

(43.84)<br />

24.30<br />

(29.30)<br />

36.43<br />

(37.13)<br />

36.12<br />

(36.82)<br />

S.Em± CD (0.01)<br />

A (Weedicide) 0.110 0.417<br />

B (conc.) 0.084 0.315<br />

A x B 0.221 0.834<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Mean<br />

23.96 d<br />

(26.67)<br />

29.60 a<br />

(32.80)<br />

15.80 f<br />

(21.12)<br />

24.66 c<br />

(29.43)<br />

27.54 b<br />

(30.98)<br />

16.45 e<br />

(23.62)<br />

16.35e<br />

(33.31)<br />

22.02<br />

(26.71)


Days after<br />

storage<br />

Table 24. Persistence of Metarhizium anisopliae in soil and phylloplane<br />

Colony forming units (CFU)<br />

Simulated field conditions Field conditions<br />

Phylloplane (per<br />

sq.m. area)<br />

Soil (per g of soil<br />

x 10 4 )<br />

Phylloplane (per<br />

sq.m. area)<br />

Soil (per g of soil)<br />

Open air temperature<br />

Maximum Minimum<br />

Rainfall (mm)<br />

0 104 352 131 25.6 x 10 9<br />

29.9 15.0 0.0<br />

30 69 330 48 17.2 x 10 7<br />

34.0 16.8 0.0<br />

60 19 282 5 18.4 x 10 3<br />

35.3 18.5 0.0<br />

90 - 418 - 52 35.7 22.0 52.1<br />

120 - 462 - 17 34.8 21.5 23.2<br />

150 - 345 - 2 30.3 21.3 32.5<br />

180 - 217 - - 26.8 21.1 33.1<br />

210 - 302 - - 27.2 20.9 58.1<br />

240 - 201 - - 30.1 20.2 53.6<br />

270 - 162 - - 30.1 19.9 17.0<br />

300 - 105 - - 31.0 17.9 0.0<br />

330 - 83 - - 29.6 13.7 0.0<br />

360 - 63 - - 30.1 16.3 0.0<br />

390 - 42 - - 31.9 17.7 0.0<br />

420 - 15 - - 36.0 20.0 62.7<br />

460 - 6 - - 37.2 21.7 0.0<br />

490 - 2 - - 34.9 23.0 67.0


Days after<br />

storage<br />

Table 25. Persistence of Verticillium lecanii in soil and phylloplane<br />

Colony forming units (CFU) Open air temperature Rainfall (mm)<br />

Simulated field conditions Field conditions<br />

Phylloplane (per<br />

sq.m area)<br />

Soil (per g of soil<br />

x 10 4 )<br />

Phylloplane (per<br />

sq.m area)<br />

Soil (per g of soil)<br />

Maximum Minimum<br />

0 147 323 129 20.3 x 10 9 29.9 15.0 -<br />

30 105 281 14 18.6 x 10 5 34.0 16.8 -<br />

60 26 169 - 168 35.3 18.5 -<br />

90 5 210 - 24 35.7 22.0 52.1<br />

120 2 245 - - 34.8 21.5 23.2<br />

150 - 192 - - 30.3 21.3 32.5<br />

180 - 114 - - 26.8 21.1 33.1<br />

210 - 81 - - 27.2 20.9 58.1<br />

240 - 58 - - 30.1 20.2 53.6<br />

270 - 37 - - 30.1 19.9 17.0<br />

300 - 18 - - 31.0 17.9 0.0<br />

330 - 9 - - 29.6 13.7 0.0<br />

360 - 2 - - 30.1 16.3 0.0<br />

390 - - - - 31.9 17.7 0.0<br />

420 - - - - 36.0 20.0 62.7<br />

460 - - - - 37.2 21.7 0.0<br />

490 - - - - 34.9 23.0 67.0


4.8 SURVIVAL ABILITY <strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) <strong>AND</strong><br />

Verticilliumlecanii (Vl1) IN DIFFERENT OIL BASED <strong>AND</strong><br />

WETTABLE POWDER FORMULATIONS UNDER<br />

DIFFERENT STORAGE TEMPERATURE LEVELS<br />

Different oil based wettable powder based formulations were evaluated for their<br />

suitability to support the conidial germination of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii under different<br />

storage temperature (room temperature, earthern pot temperature, refrigeration and deep<br />

freezer) at 20, 45, 75, 90 and 150 days after storage. The results are presented in Table 26 to<br />

37.<br />

4.8.1 Survival ability of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2)<br />

20 DAS<br />

There was a uniform germination after 20 days of storage amongst different<br />

formulations at all the storage temperature.<br />

The interaction effect of temperature and storage period was significant on conidial<br />

viability in room and earthen pot temperatures. Irrespective of the carrier based formulations,<br />

increased conidial viability was observed upto 45 days of storage at all temperatures (room,<br />

earthern pot, refrigerated and deep freezer storage temperature). A conidial viability above 90<br />

per cent was retained in case of room and earthern pot temperature. The interaction effect<br />

was non-significant under refrigerated and deep-freezer storage temperature at 20, 45 and 75<br />

days of storage.<br />

45 DAS<br />

At 45 days of storage in room temperature, 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

sunflower oil formulation was able to show maximum germination of 96.91 per cent, but this<br />

treatment however failed to differ from 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower oil<br />

(95.40%), 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour (94.90%) and 50 per cent conidia +<br />

50 per cent sorghum flour (94.96%) at room temperature storage. Germination across all<br />

treatments recorded more than 90 per cent at room temperature and earthern pot after 45<br />

days.<br />

In the earthern pots, the maximum viability was found with treatment 75 per cent<br />

conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil (98.36) followed by 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent<br />

sunflower oil (96.26%) and 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sorghum flour (95.83%).<br />

However, the maximum reduction in germination was recorded with 50 per cent conidia + 50<br />

per cent groundnut oil and 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour at earthern pot<br />

storage temperature after 45 days of inoculation (Table 27).<br />

75 DAS<br />

Interaction of storage temperature, storage period on viable counts of M. anisopliae<br />

after 75 days of storage in case of room and earthern pot storage revealed that 75 per cent<br />

conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour (85.46% and 88.73%) (Table 28) based formulation<br />

showed maximum viability under room and earthern pot storage respectively, which was<br />

significantly superior over other carrier materials. On the other hand, 50 per cent conidia + 50<br />

per cent sorghum flour (89.00% and 83.30%) was on par with maximum conidia i.e. 75 per<br />

cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour under earthern pot temperature. At room<br />

temperature, 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent groundnut oil (75.50%) and 50 per cent conidia + 50<br />

per cent mustard (75.68%) on par with each other recorded the least germination, whereas in the<br />

earthern pot, 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour (77.74%) and 50 per cent conidia<br />

+ 50 per cent mustard (78.13%) recorded the least viability (Table 28). After 75 days, a<br />

gradual decline in viability of M. anisopliae was noticed when stored at room temperature and<br />

earthern pot temperature, but with no significant difference in case of refrigerated and deep<br />

freezer storage.


Table 26. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and wettable powder<br />

formulations under different storage temperature (20 DAI)<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

99.50 a<br />

(86.00)<br />

99.20 ab<br />

(84.92)<br />

98.76 ab<br />

(83.66)<br />

98.37 ab<br />

(82.66)<br />

98.36 ab<br />

(82.66)<br />

98.10 ab<br />

(82.08)<br />

98.53 ab<br />

(83.10)<br />

98.00 ab<br />

(81.81)<br />

98.50 b<br />

(82.97)<br />

97.83 ab<br />

(81.53)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern<br />

pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

99.56 a<br />

(86.94)<br />

99.46 a<br />

(85.89)<br />

98.90 a<br />

(84.03)<br />

98.98 a<br />

(84.19)<br />

98.86 a<br />

(83.89)<br />

98.73 a<br />

(83.56)<br />

98.53 a<br />

(83.17)<br />

98.73 a<br />

(83.73)<br />

98.56 a<br />

(83.17)<br />

98.03 a<br />

(81.94)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

99.66 a<br />

(87.53)<br />

99.63 a<br />

(86.55)<br />

99.61 a<br />

(86.39)<br />

99.60 a<br />

(86.39)<br />

99.20 a<br />

(84.87)<br />

99.23 a<br />

(83.99)<br />

99.40 a<br />

(85.69)<br />

99.06 a<br />

(83.56)<br />

98.73 a<br />

(83.60)<br />

98.80 a<br />

(83.76)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

99.83 a<br />

(88.10)<br />

99.83 a<br />

(88.10)<br />

99.53 a<br />

(86.19)<br />

99.70 a<br />

(87.00)<br />

99.50 a<br />

(86.00)<br />

99.23 a<br />

(85.02)<br />

99.63 a<br />

(86.75)<br />

99.23 a<br />

(85.02)<br />

99.03 a<br />

(84.39)<br />

98.56 a<br />

(83.17)


Table 27. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and wettable powder<br />

formulations under different storage temperature (45 DAI)<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

93.10 bc<br />

(74.77)<br />

90.00 d<br />

(71.59)<br />

93.40 bc<br />

(77.69)<br />

92.50 bcd<br />

(74.11)<br />

96.91 a<br />

(79.89)<br />

95.40 ab<br />

(77.62)<br />

90.90 cd<br />

(72.45)<br />

89.63 d<br />

(71.23)<br />

94.90 ab<br />

(79.96)<br />

94.96 ab<br />

(77.03)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern<br />

pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

93.50 c<br />

(75.23)<br />

91.23 d<br />

(72.77)<br />

94.40 c<br />

(76.31)<br />

94.33 c<br />

(76.23)<br />

98.36 a<br />

(82.69)<br />

96.26 b<br />

(78.19)<br />

93.46 c<br />

(75.19)<br />

90.90 d<br />

(72.45)<br />

94.23 c<br />

(76.10)<br />

95.83 b<br />

(78.25)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.03)<br />

97.56 a<br />

(81.12)<br />

98.20 a<br />

(85.81)<br />

97.50 a<br />

(80.90)<br />

99.26 a<br />

(85.13)<br />

98.00 a<br />

(81.91)<br />

97.23 a<br />

(80.60)<br />

98.33 a<br />

(82.11)<br />

98.30 a<br />

(82.61)<br />

97.91 a<br />

(81.68)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.02)<br />

98.46 a<br />

(82.90)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.03)<br />

98.23 a<br />

(852.37)<br />

99.00 a<br />

(84.389)<br />

99.16 a<br />

(84.77)<br />

98.73 a<br />

(83.56)<br />

98.46 a<br />

(82.90)<br />

98.80 a<br />

(83.78)<br />

99.23 a<br />

(85.17)


Table 28. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and wettable powder<br />

formulations under different storage temperature (75 DAI)<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

77.86 d<br />

(61.94)<br />

75.50 e<br />

(60.33)<br />

77.83 d<br />

(61.91)<br />

75.68 e<br />

(60.44)<br />

82.76 b<br />

(65.47)<br />

79.23 c<br />

(62.89)<br />

77.40 d<br />

(61.61)<br />

77.00 d<br />

(61.34)<br />

85.46 a<br />

(67.59)<br />

83.30 b<br />

(65.85)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

80.23 de<br />

(63.60)<br />

79.40 f<br />

(63.00)<br />

80.63 d<br />

(63.89)<br />

78.13 g<br />

(62.12)<br />

84.63 b<br />

(66.92)<br />

82.98 c<br />

(65.63)<br />

79.56 ef<br />

(63.13)<br />

77.74 g<br />

(61.84)<br />

88.73 a<br />

(70.39)<br />

89.00 a<br />

(70.63)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

96.06 a<br />

(78.57)<br />

95.43 a<br />

(77.67)<br />

95.56 a<br />

(77.85)<br />

96.56 a<br />

(79.37)<br />

96.13 a<br />

(78.68)<br />

95.41 a<br />

(77.66)<br />

86.33 a<br />

(79.00)<br />

95.83 a<br />

(78.25)<br />

96.23 a<br />

(78.83)<br />

96.00 a<br />

(78.48)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

97.90 a<br />

(81.68)<br />

98.13 a<br />

(82.18)<br />

97.66 a<br />

(81.35)<br />

97.86 a<br />

(81.35)<br />

98.00 a<br />

(81.91)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.03)<br />

97.73 a<br />

(81.39)<br />

97.56 a<br />

(81.12)<br />

97.60 a<br />

(81.10)<br />

97.73 a<br />

(81.49)


90 DAS<br />

After 90 days of storage, sharp decline in the viability of M. anisopliae was noticed<br />

when stored at room temperature and earthern pot, while a gradual decline in viability was<br />

recorded at refrigerated temperature.<br />

The maximum viability under room temperature was found in wettable powder based<br />

formulation i.e. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour (78.70%) followed by 50 per<br />

cent conidia + 50 per cent sorghum flour (74.94%) and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

sunflower oil (72.50%), whereas 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent groundnut recorded least<br />

among the treatment carriers with 58.50 per cent germination. In case of earthern pot also 75<br />

per cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour recorded the highest per cent germination<br />

(84.06%) followed by 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sorghum flour (79.64%), 50 per cent<br />

conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour (76.56%), 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut<br />

(66.16%) and lowest germination with 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent mustard (63.73%)<br />

and 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower (73.66%) which were on par with each other<br />

(Table 29).<br />

At refrigerated storage, 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent mustard (92.33%) showed<br />

maximum per cent germination which was on par with 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent<br />

sunflower (87.90) and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent wheat flour (91.40%).<br />

120 DAS<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae exhibited moderate viability at both (room temperature and<br />

earthern pot) and per cent germination had dropped below 50 per cent after 120 days to<br />

storage except under 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil (53.13% and 59.56%)<br />

and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut oil (51.50% and 56.73%) room temperature<br />

and earthern pot respectively.<br />

With increase in days of storage, oil formulation excelled in its ability to support the<br />

viability of the mycopathogen lagging behind the wettable powder formulation. Under room<br />

temperature, 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower proved superior by producing<br />

significantly higher spore germination (53.13%) and was on par with 75 per cent conidia + 25<br />

per cent groundnut oil (51.50%). Mixing of 50 per cent conidia and 50 per cent mustard<br />

(50.33%) did not differ from 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut (51.50%) followed by<br />

75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent mustard (40.33%) and 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent<br />

sunflower (47.36%). In others, the spore germination was considerably less.<br />

At earthern pot storage temperature again, the 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

sunflower proved superior with 59.56 per cent germination followed by 75 per cent conidia +<br />

25 per cent groundnut (56.73). However, this treatment did not differ from 75 per cent conidia<br />

+ 25 per cent mustard (55.90%) followed by 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent mustard<br />

(54.23%) with 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower (53.80%), whereas the least<br />

percentage of germination was recorded with 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour<br />

(38.43%) (Table 30 and Fig. 6).<br />

150 DAS<br />

A sharp decrease in conidial population was observed in all carrier materials at both<br />

temperature (room temperature and earthern pot) after 150 days and also declined at other<br />

storage temperature (refrigerated and deep freezer). In general, all the carrier materials had<br />

maximum conidial viability in case of refrigeration and deep freezer storage.


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 29. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (90 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

62.46 f<br />

(52.22)<br />

58.50 h<br />

(49.89)<br />

62.34 f<br />

(52.14)<br />

59.90 g<br />

(50.71)<br />

72.60 c<br />

(58.43)<br />

70.40 e<br />

(57.03)<br />

71.60 d<br />

(57.80)<br />

71.26 d<br />

(57.58)<br />

78.70 a<br />

(62.51)<br />

74.94 b<br />

(59.69)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

66.16 cd<br />

(54.23)<br />

63.66 e<br />

(52.93)<br />

65.36 f<br />

(53.95)<br />

63.73 g<br />

(52.97)<br />

75.86 f<br />

(60.59)<br />

73.66 g<br />

(59.12)<br />

75.23 d<br />

(60.15)<br />

76.56 c<br />

(61.06)<br />

84.06 a<br />

(66.47)<br />

79.64 b<br />

(63.17)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

90.23 e<br />

(71.81)<br />

91.90 e<br />

(73.46)<br />

92.33 a<br />

(73.94)<br />

88.90 de<br />

(70.55)<br />

80.00 cd<br />

(69.73)<br />

87.90 ab<br />

(69.64)<br />

91.40 abc<br />

(72.99)<br />

60.63 bc<br />

(72.18)<br />

89.00 de<br />

(70.64)<br />

89.06 de<br />

(70.69)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

98.00 a<br />

(81.91)<br />

97.23 a<br />

(80.47)<br />

98.00 a<br />

(81.91)<br />

98.33 a<br />

(82.71)<br />

97.16 a<br />

(80.41)<br />

97.03 a<br />

(80.12)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.03)<br />

98.03 a<br />

(81.97)<br />

98.13 a<br />

(82.48)<br />

97.66 a<br />

(81.30)


The maximum population of germination was recorded with 75 per cent conidia + 25<br />

per cent sunflower at all storage temperature i.e. 38.00 per cent (room temperature), 41.33<br />

per cent (earthern pot), 85.88 per cent (refrigerated), 93.73 (deep freezer) (Table 31).<br />

However, other carrier material failed to differ from this treatment in case of refrigerated and<br />

deep freezer. On the other hand, 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour supported<br />

least germination (19.00 and 22.90 per cent at room temperature and earthern pot storage)<br />

temperature respectively. There was no significant variation in the percentage germination<br />

between the different oils and wettable powder carrier material under refrigerated and deep<br />

freezer storage temperature.<br />

4.8.2 Survival ability of Verticillium lecanii (Vl1)<br />

20 DAS<br />

After 20 days of storage at room temperature and earthern pot, maximum<br />

germination was recorded with the formulation having 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

sunflower (95.90%) which was on par with 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut<br />

(96.15%). On the other hand, maximum percentage inhibition was recorded with 50 per cent<br />

conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour (86.40%) and 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent mustard oil<br />

(86.32%) (Table 32).<br />

In earthern pot storage temperature, maximum viability was found in oil formulation<br />

i.e. 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

groundnut with per cent germination of 96.33 per cent and 96.49 respectively, which failed to<br />

differ from each other. The next best carrier material was 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent<br />

sunflower oil (95.06%) and followed by 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent groundnut oil<br />

(74.17%) and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent mustard oil (93.26%). The effect was nonsignificant<br />

under refrigerated and deep freezer storage temperature.<br />

45 DAS<br />

In general, all the oil formulation carrier material had more viability than wettable<br />

powder carrier material. After 45 day of storage, the conidial population of V. lecanii was<br />

reduced to more than 15 per cent in all the carrier materials. At room temperature, maximum<br />

germination of 72.76 per cent was observed with 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower<br />

oil followed by 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent groundnut (60.51%) and least germination<br />

was observed with 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour formulated carrier material<br />

(50.74%) (Table 33). Similar to room temperature, 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

sunflower oil showed maximum viability (81.15%) under earthern pot temperature followed by<br />

75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut (76.32%), 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent<br />

groundnut (69.98%) and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour (65.77%) (Table 33).<br />

Under refrigerated storage 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut oil had<br />

maximum per cent germination (93.73), whereas under deep-freezer 75 per cent conidia + 25<br />

per cent groundnut oil and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil were on par with<br />

each other showing maximum per cent germination.<br />

75 DAS<br />

After 75 days of storage conidial population declined at both room temperature and<br />

earthern pot. The trend in reduction of conidial viability remained same at 75 days as in 45<br />

days of storage, under room temperature, whereas in the earthern pot storage 75 per cent<br />

conidia + 25 per cent groundnut oil took the upper hand lagging behind 75 per cent conidia +<br />

25 per cent sunflower oil and 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower oil. However,<br />

maximum reduction of population was recorded with 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat<br />

flour formulated carrier material (Table 34).


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 30. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (120 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

51.50 ab<br />

(45.86)<br />

45.90 de<br />

(42.64)<br />

48.33 c<br />

(44.04)<br />

50.33 b<br />

(45.19)<br />

53.13 a<br />

(47.79)<br />

47.36 cd<br />

(43.47)<br />

43.80 f<br />

(41.44)<br />

33.85h<br />

(35.56)<br />

45.46 ef<br />

(42.40)<br />

37.73 g<br />

(37.89)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

56.73 b<br />

(48.87)<br />

48.53 d<br />

(44.16)<br />

55.90 b<br />

(48.38)<br />

54.23 c<br />

(47.42)<br />

59.56 a<br />

(50.51)<br />

53.80 c<br />

(47.17)<br />

48.10 d<br />

(43.91)<br />

38.43 g<br />

(38.31)<br />

45.33 e<br />

(42.32)<br />

41.73 f<br />

(40.24)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

87.56 a<br />

(69.36)<br />

85.36 b<br />

(67.51)<br />

88.00 a<br />

(69.73)<br />

86.83 a<br />

(68.73)<br />

87.33 a<br />

(69.15)<br />

84.80 bc<br />

(67.05)<br />

87.33 a<br />

(69.15)<br />

83.83 c<br />

(66.29)<br />

87.00 a<br />

(68.59)<br />

85.16 bc<br />

(67.35)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

95.50 ab<br />

(77.76)<br />

94.50 bc<br />

(76.47)<br />

95.65 ab<br />

(77.95)<br />

96.50 a<br />

(79.23)<br />

95.23 ab<br />

(77.39)<br />

94.33 bc<br />

(76.25)<br />

93.60 cd<br />

(75.35)<br />

91.90 e<br />

(73.47)<br />

92.60 de<br />

(74.22)<br />

93.40 cd<br />

(75.13)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 31. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (150 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

31.46 c<br />

(34.12)<br />

28.06 e<br />

(31.99)<br />

27.66 e<br />

(31.73)<br />

29.73 d<br />

(33.04)<br />

38.00 a<br />

(38.05)<br />

32.90 b<br />

(35.00)<br />

26.03 f<br />

(30.68)<br />

19.00 h<br />

(25.84)<br />

27.66 e<br />

(31.73)<br />

21.06 g<br />

(27.31)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern<br />

pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

33.66 b<br />

(35.41)<br />

31.16 c<br />

(33.93)<br />

30.16 d<br />

(33.31)<br />

30.23 d<br />

(33.35)<br />

41.23 a<br />

(40.01)<br />

34.13 b<br />

(35.75)<br />

28.06 e<br />

(31.99)<br />

22.90 g<br />

(28.58)<br />

29.43 d<br />

(32.85)<br />

23.90 f<br />

(29.26)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

85.96 ab<br />

(68.00)<br />

85.00 bcd<br />

(67.21)<br />

85.66 abc<br />

(67.75)<br />

86.50 a<br />

(68.45)<br />

85.88 ab<br />

(67.92)<br />

84.36 bc<br />

(66.71)<br />

84.00 d<br />

(66.43)<br />

82.33 e<br />

(65.15)<br />

86.33 ab<br />

(68.31)<br />

86.16 ab<br />

(68.18)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

92.80 bc<br />

(74.44)<br />

94.03 ab<br />

(75.86)<br />

92.23 c<br />

(73.84)<br />

92.96 bc<br />

(74.62)<br />

93.73 ab<br />

(75.50)<br />

94.70 a<br />

(76.69)<br />

93.73 ab<br />

(75.50)<br />

93.33 abc<br />

(75.08)<br />

93.00 bc<br />

(74.66)<br />

93.16 bc<br />

(74.86)


Per cent germination<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

Verticillium lecanii<br />

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10<br />

Legend<br />

T1 - 75% conidia + 25% groundnut oil<br />

T2 - 50% conidia + 50% groundnut oil<br />

T3 - 75% conidia + 25% mustard oil<br />

T4 - 50% conidia + 50% mustard oil<br />

T5 - 75% conidia + 25% sunflower oil<br />

Room temperature (28±2°C)<br />

T6 - 50% conidia + 50% sunflower oil<br />

T7 - 75% conidia + 25% wheat flour<br />

T8 - 50% conidia + 50% wheat flour<br />

T9 - 75% conidia + 25% sorghum flour<br />

T10 - 50% conidia + 50% sorghum flour<br />

Fig. 6. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) and Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) in differnet formulations under different storage<br />

temperature (120 DAI)<br />

Fig. 6. Survival of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2) and Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) in different formulation under different storage<br />

Temperature (120 DAl)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 32. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (20 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

96.15 a<br />

(78.60)<br />

93.83 c<br />

(75.59)<br />

92.02 d<br />

(73.57)<br />

86.32 f<br />

(68.28)<br />

95.90 a<br />

(78.36)<br />

94.50 b<br />

(76.47)<br />

88.20 e<br />

(69.91)<br />

86.40 f<br />

(68.39)<br />

90.03 d<br />

(71.60)<br />

87.75 e<br />

(69.50)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern<br />

pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

96.49 a<br />

(79.17)<br />

94.17 c<br />

(76.03)<br />

93.26 d<br />

(74.92)<br />

89.74 fg<br />

(71.28)<br />

96.33 a<br />

(78.96)<br />

95.06 b<br />

(77.16)<br />

90.26 f<br />

(71.82)<br />

89.01 g<br />

(70.63)<br />

91.90 e<br />

(73.46)<br />

90.43 f<br />

(71.98)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

99.12 a<br />

(84.65)<br />

99.45 a<br />

(85.79)<br />

99.11 a<br />

(84.65)<br />

99.16 a<br />

(84.69)<br />

98.33 a<br />

(82.61)<br />

98.40 a<br />

(82.76)<br />

98.17 a<br />

(82.23)<br />

98.03 a<br />

(82.00)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.03)<br />

97.61 a<br />

(81.04)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

99.36 a<br />

(85.49)<br />

99.34 a<br />

(85.34)<br />

99.05 a<br />

(84.40)<br />

99.31 a<br />

(85.25)<br />

99.40 a<br />

(86.37)<br />

99.58 a<br />

(86.25)<br />

98.91 a<br />

(83.99)<br />

98.50 a<br />

(83.03)<br />

99.50 a<br />

(86.73)<br />

99.00 a<br />

(85.31)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 33. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (45 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

65.90 c<br />

(54.27)<br />

60.51 d<br />

(51.04)<br />

59.01 e<br />

(50.18)<br />

56.85 g<br />

(48.92)<br />

72.76 a<br />

(58.54)<br />

67.41 b<br />

(55.18)<br />

55.40 h<br />

(48.10)<br />

50.74l<br />

(45.42)<br />

58.26 f<br />

(49.76)<br />

55.50 h<br />

(48.15)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern<br />

pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

76.33 b<br />

(60.90)<br />

68.98 c<br />

(56.14)<br />

64.66 e<br />

(53.53)<br />

62.61 f<br />

(52.30)<br />

81.15 a<br />

(64.26)<br />

69.98 c<br />

(56.76)<br />

61.38 g<br />

(51.57)<br />

56.41 h<br />

(46.68)<br />

65.77 d<br />

(54.19)<br />

63.16 f<br />

(52.63)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

93.73 a<br />

(75.59)<br />

91.89 b<br />

(73.47)<br />

91.50 bc<br />

(73.08)<br />

90.78 bcd<br />

(72.32)<br />

91.69 bc<br />

(73.22)<br />

91.61 bc<br />

(73.19)<br />

89.40 de<br />

(71.00)<br />

89.74 cde<br />

(71.32)<br />

91.16 bcd<br />

(72.73)<br />

88.16 e<br />

(69.88)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

98.00 a<br />

(81.91)<br />

94.60 b<br />

(76.53)<br />

94.00 b<br />

(75.83)<br />

94.00 b<br />

(75.83)<br />

97.45 a<br />

(80.91)<br />

93.53 bc<br />

(75.27)<br />

92.26 cd<br />

(73.85)<br />

91.33 d<br />

(72.88)<br />

94.50 b<br />

(76.44)<br />

90.83 d<br />

(72.38)


90 DAS<br />

A sharp decrease in conidia was observed in all carrier material at both temperature<br />

(room and earthern pot). Even in other storage temperature (refrigerated and deep freezer)<br />

there was decline after 90 days of storage.<br />

Among all the storage temperature, maximum conidial viability was recorded with 75<br />

per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil with per cent germination of 65.46, 87.60 and<br />

91.50 under room temperature, earthern pot, refrigerated and deep freezer respectively<br />

(Table 35). After 90 days of storage, the per cent germination had dropped below 50 per cent<br />

in all except 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower (65.46%), 50 per cent conidia + 50<br />

per cent sunflower (59.08%) and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent groundnut oil (50.58%)<br />

stored at room temperature, whereas under earthern pot storage, 75 per cent + 25 per cent<br />

(65.41), 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower (60.59%), 75 per cent conidia + 25 per<br />

cent groundnut (60.95), 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent groundnut oil (51.62 per cent) and<br />

75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour recorded more than 50 per cent germination<br />

(Table 35).<br />

120 DAS<br />

In case of refrigerated and deep freezer storage temperature all carrier material were<br />

able to retain a conidial viability above 80 per cent.<br />

At 120 days of storage, the germination ranged from 28.60 at room temperature in 50<br />

per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour to maximum of 88.96 per cent at deep freezer in 75<br />

per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower soil treatment (Table 36 and Fig. 6).<br />

The maximum viability under room temperature and earthern pot was recorded in 75<br />

per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower (62.73 and 64.26%) followed by 50 per cent conidia<br />

+ 50 per cent groundnut (45.28% and 50.91%) and lowest viability in 50 per cent conidia + 50<br />

wheat flour (28.60% and 28.73% under room temperature and earthern pot respectively). The<br />

conidial viability in refrigerated temperature was maximum again in 75 per cent conidia + 25<br />

per cent sunflower (85.32%). However, 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent sunflower, 75 per<br />

cent conidia + 25 per cent sorghum flour and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent wheat flour<br />

were next in order with 84.26 per cent, 84.23 per cent and 83.66 per cent and the least<br />

viability was recorded in 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent mustard (78.16 per cent<br />

germination) (Table 36).<br />

150 DAS<br />

Storage temperature has significant effect on the viability of V. lecanii after 150 days.<br />

The survival was significantly higher when stored at deep freezer, but significantly reduced<br />

when stored at prevailing room temperature. The per cent germination had dropped below 50<br />

per cent in all except 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil both at room and<br />

earthern pot temperature condition (Table 37).<br />

Irrespective of the storage temperature, wettable powder formulation significantly<br />

affected the viability of V. lecanii at room temperature and earthen pot temperature.<br />

Significant variation among the various conidial protectants were observed, where in 75 per<br />

cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil supported maximum number of conidial germination<br />

(54.13% and 56.46% at room and earthen pot temperature respectively) and the least in case<br />

of 50 per cent conidia + 50 per cent wheat flour (14.24%) at room temperature and 50 per<br />

cent conidia + 50 per cent sorghum flour in the earthen pot.


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 34. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (75 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

54.63 c<br />

(47.65)<br />

48.73 e<br />

(44.25)<br />

46.31 f<br />

(42.88)<br />

45.16 g<br />

(42.22)<br />

64.60 a<br />

(53.49)<br />

60.83 b<br />

(51.25)<br />

46.26 f<br />

(42.86)<br />

40.50 h<br />

(39.52)<br />

51.68 d<br />

(45.95)<br />

46.26 f<br />

(42.86)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

68.13 a<br />

(55.63)<br />

55.25 d<br />

(48.00)<br />

48.43 f<br />

(44.10)<br />

45.26 h<br />

(42.28)<br />

67.28 b<br />

(55.102)<br />

60.50 c<br />

(51.06)<br />

46.66 g<br />

(43.09)<br />

41.00l<br />

(39.81)<br />

53.85 e<br />

(47.20)<br />

46.50 g<br />

(42.99)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

88.17 a<br />

(69.88)<br />

84.87 c<br />

(66.98)<br />

85.83 b<br />

(67.89)<br />

84.23 c<br />

(66.60)<br />

88.45 a<br />

(70.12)<br />

86.26 b<br />

(68.25)<br />

86.16 b<br />

(68.16)<br />

83.41 d<br />

(65.95)<br />

88.00 a<br />

(69.73)<br />

84.50 c<br />

(66.81)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

91.33 a<br />

(73.50)<br />

89.60 c<br />

(71.19)<br />

90.00 abc<br />

(71.57)<br />

88.33 c<br />

(70.03)<br />

91.61 ab<br />

(73.15)<br />

88.64 c<br />

(70.30)<br />

91.70 ab<br />

(73.43)<br />

88.41 c<br />

(70.09)<br />

89.80 bc<br />

(71.37)<br />

88.16 c<br />

(69.88)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 35. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (90 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

50.58 c<br />

(45.32)<br />

45.81 d<br />

(42.59)<br />

40.90 e<br />

(39.75)<br />

38.28 f<br />

(38.21)<br />

65.46 a<br />

(453.91)<br />

59.08 b<br />

(50.22)<br />

44.73 d<br />

(41.97)<br />

35.56 g<br />

(36.61)<br />

49.50 c<br />

(44.71)<br />

44.50 d<br />

(41.84)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

60.95 b<br />

(51.31)<br />

51.62 c<br />

(45.91)<br />

43.25 e<br />

(41.11)<br />

40.86 f<br />

(39.74)<br />

65.41 a<br />

(53.97)<br />

60.59 b<br />

(51.10)<br />

45.83 d<br />

(42.61)<br />

36.60 g<br />

(37.22)<br />

51.26 c<br />

(45.72)<br />

45.61 d<br />

(42.66)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

86.30 a<br />

(68.27)<br />

83.03 de<br />

(65.67)<br />

83.30 d<br />

(65.88)<br />

81.24 f<br />

(64.35)<br />

87.60 a<br />

(69.38)<br />

85.00 c<br />

(67.21)<br />

84.50 c<br />

(66.81)<br />

82.50 e<br />

(65.27)<br />

86.26 b<br />

(68.25)<br />

84.50 c<br />

(66.81)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

88.26 c<br />

(69.97)<br />

87.24 cd<br />

(69.07)<br />

87.26 cd<br />

(69.09)<br />

86.16 d<br />

(68.17)<br />

91.50 a<br />

(73.08)<br />

88.00 c<br />

(69.70)<br />

87.83 c<br />

(69.58)<br />

87.50 c<br />

(69.30)<br />

90.00 b<br />

(71.58)<br />

87.23 cd<br />

(69.07)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 36. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (120 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

45.28 c<br />

(42.28)<br />

42.16 e<br />

(40.49)<br />

32.53 h<br />

(34.77)<br />

33.33 g<br />

(35.26)<br />

62.73 a<br />

(52.37)<br />

56.56 b<br />

(48.77)<br />

32.50 h<br />

(34.75)<br />

28.60 l<br />

(32.33)<br />

44.28 d<br />

(41.70)<br />

41.16 f<br />

(39.91)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

50.91 c<br />

(45.51)<br />

47.19 d<br />

(43.39)<br />

34.27 h<br />

(35.83)<br />

36.00 g<br />

(36.87)<br />

64.26 a<br />

(53.29)<br />

59.00 b<br />

(50.18)<br />

33.50 l<br />

(35.36)<br />

28.73 j<br />

(32.41)<br />

43.91 e<br />

(41.68)<br />

39.40 f<br />

(38.88)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

81.66 e<br />

(64.65)<br />

79.50 d<br />

(63.06)<br />

79.30 d<br />

(62.94)<br />

78.16 e<br />

(62.14)<br />

85.83 a<br />

(67.89)<br />

84.26 b<br />

(66.63)<br />

83.66 b<br />

(66.17)<br />

82.33 c<br />

(65.15)<br />

84.23 b<br />

(66.60)<br />

82.29 c<br />

(64.82)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

87.33 bc<br />

(69.16)<br />

86.50 c<br />

(68.44)<br />

86.26 c<br />

(68.25)<br />

84.83 d<br />

(67.08)<br />

88.96 a<br />

(70.61)<br />

86.50 c<br />

(68.44)<br />

88.00 ab<br />

(69.74)<br />

787.83 ab<br />

(69.60)<br />

87.80 ab<br />

(69.57)<br />

86.26 c<br />

(68.25)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 37. Survival of Verticillium lecanii in different oil based and wettable<br />

powder formulations under different storage temperature (150 DAI)<br />

Treatments Room<br />

temperature<br />

(28±2°C)<br />

1. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

2. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

groundnut oil<br />

3. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

mustard oil<br />

4. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

mustard oil<br />

5. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

6. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sunflower oil<br />

7. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

wheat flour<br />

8. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

wheat flour<br />

9. 75% conidia + 25%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

10. 50% conidia + 50%<br />

sorghum flour<br />

32.23 c<br />

(34.59)<br />

28.91 d<br />

(32.52)<br />

27.00 e<br />

(31.30)<br />

28.41 d<br />

(32.20)<br />

54.13 a<br />

(47.37)<br />

42.28 b<br />

(40.55)<br />

21.00 g<br />

(27.27)<br />

14.28l<br />

(22.1)<br />

24.06 f<br />

(29.37)<br />

15.87 h<br />

(23.47)<br />

Per cent germination<br />

Earthern pots<br />

(22±3°C)<br />

35.70 c<br />

(36.69)<br />

30.59 d<br />

(33.58)<br />

28.33 e<br />

(32.16)<br />

30.44 d<br />

(33.48)<br />

56.46 a<br />

(48.71)<br />

45.90 b<br />

(42.65)<br />

20.83 g<br />

(27.15)<br />

19.23h<br />

(26.01)<br />

24.00 f<br />

(29.35)<br />

18.40 l<br />

(25.39)<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)<br />

Figures in the parenthesis are arc sin values<br />

Refrige<br />

ration<br />

(6°C)<br />

78.66 b<br />

(62.49)<br />

76.50 c<br />

(61.00)<br />

75.56 d<br />

(60.15)<br />

75.58 d<br />

(60.37)<br />

79.26 a<br />

(62.91)<br />

74.28 f<br />

(59.51)<br />

72.56 g<br />

(58.30)<br />

71.00h<br />

(57.31)<br />

76.60 c<br />

(60.91)<br />

75.00 e<br />

(60.22)<br />

Deep freezer<br />

(-20°C)<br />

83.23 de<br />

(65.82)<br />

83.53 cd<br />

(66.06)<br />

81.41 f<br />

(64.45)<br />

84.23 bc<br />

(66.60)<br />

85.57 a<br />

(67.67)<br />

84.51 b<br />

(66.81)<br />

84.21 bc<br />

(66.58)<br />

82.68 e<br />

(65.73)<br />

85.73 a<br />

(67.81)<br />

85.83 a<br />

(67.86)


4.9 PATHOGENICITY <strong>OF</strong> Verticillium lecanii ON MAJOR PESTS<br />

IN THE LABORATORY<br />

Brevicornia brassicae<br />

Various concentration of V. lecanii were evaluated against early instar nymph of B.<br />

brassicae. The mortality of nymph started after six days of treatment and was highest at 1.2x<br />

10 9 conidia/ml. Cumulative mortality of nymph increased with increase in concentration and<br />

exposure period (Table 38). The mortality of nymph on the six day was marginal (37.11%) but<br />

increased steadily to reach maximum of 92.30 per cent on 10 th day at the highest<br />

concentration and was significantly superior to the rest of the treatment at all intervals of<br />

observation.<br />

Among the concentrations tested, mean per cent mortality of 1.2 x 10 9 and 1.2 x 10 8<br />

conidia/ml were at par with each other and significantly superior to rest of the concentration.<br />

On comparison of concentrations required to cause more than 50 per cent mortality, it was<br />

noticed that 1.2 x 10 9 , 1.2 x 10 8 and 1.2 x 10 7 conidia/ml required eight days after spray.<br />

Lower dose of 1.2 x 10 5 conidia/ml was able to cause only 38.33 per cent even on 10 th day<br />

after spraying. Interaction studies revealed that significant difference in mortality was<br />

observed between all the concentration and days tested.<br />

Aleurodicus disperses<br />

The cumulative mortality increased significantly with increase in concentration and<br />

exposure period (Table 39). The mortality of larvae started after six days of treatment and it<br />

was highest at 1.2 x 10 9 conidia/ml. The mortality of the larvae on sixth day was marginal<br />

(29.42%) but increased steadily to reach maximum of 80.93 per cent on 10 th day at the<br />

highest concentration and this treatment was significantly superior to rest of the treatments at<br />

all intervals of observation.<br />

On comparison of concentration required to cause more than 50 per cent mortality, it<br />

was noticed that 1.2 x 10 9 , 1.2 x 10 8 and 1.2 x 10 7 conidia/ml required eight days after<br />

inoculation. The lowest dose of 1.2 x 10 5 conidia/ml was able to cause only 34.72 per cent<br />

mortality even on 10 th day after spraying. Interaction studies revealed that difference in<br />

mortality was observed between all the concentrations and days tested. The highest mean<br />

mortality of 60.25 per cent was recorded at the highest concentration of V. lecanii @ 1.2 x 10 9<br />

conidia/ml and mortality values decreased significantly with successive decrease in<br />

concentration. Similarly, between the duration, mortality increased significantly with increase<br />

with increase in time after treatment.<br />

The mortality of the mycosed nymph was significantly high at higher dose of spray<br />

(1.2 x 10 9 ) than the other concentrations. The mortality ranged from zero in the untreated<br />

check to 73.35 per cent at 1.2 x 10 9 conidia/ml at 10 days after treatment and 63.31 and<br />

12.88 per cent mortality at 1.2 x 10 8 and 1.2 x 10 5 conidia/ml.<br />

On comparison of concentration required to cause more than 50 per cent mortality, it<br />

was noticed that 1.2 x 10 9 and 1.2 x 10 8 conidia/ml required eight and 10 days after spray,<br />

respectively. The fungus weakly exhibited its pathogenicity at 6 days of treatment with<br />

maximum of 27.69 per cent at 1.2 x 10 9 conidia/ml and only 9.03 per cent mortality at the<br />

lowest dose of 1.2 x 10 5 conidia/ml (Table 38).


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 38. Per cent mortality of Brevicornia brassicae due to application of<br />

Verticillium lecanii under laboratory conditions<br />

Dosage<br />

(conidia/ml)<br />

1. 1.2 x 10 9<br />

2. 1.2 x 10 8<br />

3. 1.2 x 10 7<br />

4. 1.2 x 10 6<br />

5. 1.2 x 10 5<br />

Per cent mortality<br />

(Days after inoculation)<br />

6 8 10<br />

Mean<br />

47.03 g 84.86 b 92.30 a 71.42 a<br />

37.11 l 77.89 o 88.79 b 71.23 a<br />

30.71 k 56.38 l 66.12 e 51.07 b<br />

18.84 m 33.97 j 41.80 l 31.53 c<br />

16.81 n 25.72 f 38.33 i 20.95 d<br />

6. Control 0.00 o 0.00 d 0.00 o 0.00 e<br />

Mean 25.08 c 46.47 a 54.56 a 42.03<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Table 39. Per cent mortality of Aleurodicus dispersus due to application of<br />

Verticillium lecanii under laboratory conditions<br />

Dosage<br />

(conidia/ml)<br />

1. 1.2 x 10 9<br />

2. 1.2 x 10 8<br />

3. 1.2 x 10 7<br />

4. 1.2 x 10 6<br />

5. 1.2 x 10 5<br />

Per cent mortality<br />

(Days after inoculation)<br />

6 8 10<br />

Mean<br />

29.42 h 70.50 c 80.93 a 60.28 a<br />

19.75 j 68.01 d 74.70 b 54.15 b<br />

16.70 k 56.73 e 67.88 d 47.10 c<br />

15.12 k 23.55 l 42.47 f 27.05 d<br />

9.76 l 51.04 j 34.72 g 21.84 e<br />

6. Control 0.00 m 0.00 m 0.00 m 0.00 f<br />

Mean 15.13 39.97 50.12 35.07<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)


Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Table 40. Per cent reduction of nymph of Brevicornia brassicae on cabbage due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) under field conditions<br />

Treatments<br />

I spray II spray III spray<br />

3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA<br />

T1 2 x 10 5 14.26 bc 21.26 d 26.67 c 14.78 d 20.14 e 28.78 c 17.99 d 23.51 c 31.48 e<br />

T 2 2 x 10 6 16.07 b 23.54 d 32.54 b 15.91 d 21.98 de 32.44 c 19.37 cd 26.11 c 36.80 d<br />

T 3 2 x 10 8 15.68 b 25.52 d 33.08 b 18.19 c 26.59 d 38.05 b 19.82 cd 28.41 c 43.01 c<br />

T4 2 x 10 10 15.49 b 37.41 c 31.97 b 18.86 c 42.99 c 37.54 b 21.45 c 56.28 b 48.13 b<br />

T5 2 x 10 12 17.88 b 43.44 b 35.68 b 22.15 b 50.37 b 39.89 b 25.31 b 61.16 b 51.68 b<br />

T6<br />

Dimethoate 30 EC<br />

@ 1.7 ml/litre<br />

50.45 a 60.74 a 53.89 a 68.25 a 76.69 a 66.35 a 78.50 a 87.53 a 81.17 a<br />

T7 Untreated control 10.71 e 11.59 e 14.11 d 12.49 e 11.14 f 10.50 e 13.80 e 17.03 d 17.47 f<br />

DAA – Days after application<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


Culture grown on rice grains<br />

Harvest of spores<br />

Ready to use spore<br />

Plate 7. Metarhizium anisopliae cultured on rice for field use


4.11 EFFECT <strong>OF</strong> Verticillium lecanii APPLICATION ON Aphis<br />

crassivora UNDER FIELD CONDITION<br />

All the doses of the biopesticide were not significantly different from each other at 3<br />

(DAA). Dimethoate recorded significantly highest mortality compared to other treatments. The<br />

mortality ranged from 11.55 per cent in the untreated check to 85.10 per cent at chemical<br />

treatment at 7 day of 3 rd spraying (Table 40).<br />

On comparison of the biopesticide concentration required to cause more than 50 per<br />

cent mortality, it was noticed that 1.2 x 10 12 and 1.2 x 10 10 required seven days after second<br />

and third spray respectively. The fungus weakly exhibited its pathogenicity at lowest<br />

concentration of 1.2 x 10 5 with maximum of 32.37 per cent after third spray. The fungus was<br />

more effective at higher concentration and high exposure period than lower concentration and<br />

low exposure period.<br />

After first application, all the doses of biopesticide were not significantly different from<br />

each other at 3 DAA. This trend continued even after 3 rd spray. However, dimethoate caused<br />

reduction of population to over one third to stand out as significantly superior. While the<br />

fungus required third application to cause more than 50 per cent mortality, it was noticed that<br />

2 x 10 10 and 2 x 10 12 caused 57.03 and 61.80 per cent mortality after 7 DAA (Table 41).<br />

Verticillium lecanii even at the lowest dose was significantly superior to untreated<br />

control.<br />

There was no significant variation in nymphal population at three days after first spray<br />

when the mycopathogen was applied. Higher dosages of 2 x 10 10 and 2 x 10 12 performed at<br />

par but significantly superior to untreated control and lower dosage of V. lecanii. However,<br />

after third application, the fungal spray at higher dosage was significantly superior to lower<br />

dosage and the next best to consecutive spray was the succeeding dosage. Conversely, the<br />

lowest dose (T1) failed as badly as untreated check after the first spray (Table 42).<br />

The mortality where the mycopathogen was applied ranged from 10.74 per cent in the<br />

3 DAS of first spray to 66.50 per cent at higher dosage at 7 days after second spray.<br />

Verticillium lecanii on Brevicornia brassicae<br />

Treatments were imposed in the experimental area after nymphal buildup was adequate. The<br />

mortality of the mycosed nymph was significantly high at the highest dose of spray (2 x 10 12 )<br />

compared to rest of the concentrations. The mortality ranged from 10.50 per cent in the<br />

untreated check after second spray to 61.16 per cent at 2 x 10 12 conidia/ml. Nevertheless,<br />

dicofol proved to be the most effective after each spray causing more than 50 per cent<br />

mortality (Table 43).<br />

On comparison of concentration required to cause more than 50 per cent mortality, it<br />

was noticed 2 x 10 1 and 2 x 10 12 required seven days after third and second spray<br />

respectively. The fungus weakly exhibited its pathogenicity at lowest concentration of 1.2 x<br />

10 5 with maximum of 31.48 per cent mortality after third spray.<br />

The mycopathogen lagged behind the chemical toxicants in lowering the pest<br />

population due to the spray, but picked upto at 7 days after spray to prove as good as<br />

chemical toxicants. However, the effectiveness of fungus was dose dependent.<br />

Activity of aphid, B. brassicae was uniform a day before spray. However, seven days<br />

after imposition of treatments, the number varied significantly. Toxicity of dicofol to the<br />

nymphal population revealed highest mortality of 78.78 per cent after seven days of third<br />

spray (Table 44).


Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Table 41. Per cent reduction of nymph of Brevicornia brassicae on cabbage due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl2) under field conditions<br />

Treatments<br />

I spray II spray III spray<br />

3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA<br />

T 1 2 x 10 5 7.22 b 15.41 d 15.46 cd 11.67 de 17.52 f 19.78 d 12.16 cd 17.67 c 22.42 d<br />

T2 2 x 10 6 7.45 b 17.22 d 23.24 bc 13.46 cde 20.68 c 26.50 cd 12.50 cd 21.50 c 26.58 d<br />

T3 2 x 10 8 10.71 b 27.00 c 32.60 b 14.91 cd 25.08 d 34.08 bc 15.08 bcd 26.33 c 34.20 c<br />

T4 2 x 10 10 17.14 b 44.13 b 32.25 b 17.74 c 44.65 c 37.91 bc 19.83 bc 46.61 b 39.66 bc<br />

T5 2 x 10 12 17.03 b 45.32 b 30.37 b 23.3 b 50.65 b 41.55 b 28.58 b 52.25 b 43.83 b<br />

T6<br />

Dimethoate 30 EC<br />

@ 1.7 ml/litre<br />

51.93 a 67.16 a 46.19 a 55.70 a 75.48 a 60.33 a 64.91 a 78.78 a 67.12 a<br />

T 7 Untreated control 7.03 b 11.20 e 9.54 e 11.33 e 12.91 e 10.58 e 8.83 d 9.25 d 12.41 e<br />

DAA – Days after application<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Table 42. Per cent reduction of nymph of Brevicornia brassicae on cabbage due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl3) under field conditions<br />

Treatments<br />

I spray II spray III spray<br />

3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA<br />

T1 2 x 10 5 3.70 b 13.42 d 13.42 c 10.17 d 16.67 f 17.67 d 9.00 cd 15.17 c 20.17 d<br />

T2 2 x 10 6 4.17 b 16.67 d 25.00 bc 12.50 d 19.50 e 23.50 cd 9.33 cd 19.17 c 23.67 d<br />

T3 2 x 10 8 7.50 b 29.17 c 32.50 b 13.50 cd 23.83 d 32.33 bcd 13.00 bc 25.50 c 31.83 c<br />

T4 2 x 10 10 16.04 b 47.61 b 31.73 b 17.25 c 43.50 c 36.83 bc 20.17 bc 46.50 b 40.00 b<br />

T 5 2 x 10 12 15.74 b 43.98 b 28.24 bc 22.17 b 50.17 b 42.40 ab 29.33 b 53.50 b 45.00 b<br />

T6<br />

Dimethoate 30 EC<br />

@ 1.7 ml/litre<br />

52.35 a 68.05 a 43.52 a 53.33 a 75.73 a 56.00 a 63.83 a 80.00 a 67.57 a<br />

T7 Untreated control 3.33 b 10.74 d 7.41 d 9.83 d 9.83 g 5.17 e 2.83 d 2.83 d 9.83 e<br />

DAA – Days after application<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Table 43. Per cent reduction of nymph of Aphis crassivora on cowpea due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) under field conditions<br />

Treatments<br />

I spray II spray III spray<br />

3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA<br />

T1 2 x 10 5 17.73 bc 24.67 c 28.42 d 19.46 d 24.11 e 29.46 d 19.41 d 23.92 e 32.37 c<br />

T2 2 x 10 6 19.31 bc 28.79 de 32.07 cd 19.91 d 25.60 e 32.15 d 20.78 cd 28.03 de 38.53 d<br />

T3 2 x 10 8 19.48 bc 32.05 d 31.81 bc 20.82 cd 28.76 d 40.57 c 21.11 cd 31.89 d 44.73 c<br />

T4 2 x 10 10 20.00 bc 39.91 c 33.98 bcd 22.32 c 49.99 c 44.46 bc 22.83 c 55.53 c 51.03 b<br />

T 5 2 x 10 12 22.04 b 47.43 b 38.33 b 24.84 b 57.94 b 45.95 b 28.80 b 60.53 b 53.23 b<br />

T6<br />

Dimethoate 30 EC<br />

@ 1.7 ml/litre<br />

61.15 a 71.01 a 62.28 a 73.53 a 80.66 a 69.33 a 76.65 a 85.10 a 78.77 a<br />

T7 Untreated control 16.17 c 15.27 f 16.75 e 17.34 e 13.73 f 11.55 c 17.83 d 19.50 f 20.37 f<br />

DAA – Days after application<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Table 44. Per cent reduction of nymph of Aphis crassivora on cowpea due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl2) under field conditions<br />

Treatments<br />

I spray II spray III spray<br />

3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA<br />

T1 2 x 10 5 10.79 b 17.65 c 24.13 d 10.10 d 16.17 c 28.10 c 16.57 c 23.10 c 30.60 e<br />

T 2 2 x 10 6 12.84 b 18.30 c 33.02 bc 11.91 d 18.37 c 32.73 bc 17.97 bc 24.20 c 35.07 d<br />

T3 2 x 10 8 11.89 b 19.00 c 34.35 b 15.56 c 24.43 c 35.53 b 19.53 bc 24.93 c 41.30 c<br />

T4 2 x 10 10 10.98 b 34.86 b 29.97 c 15.40 c 35.99 b 30.62 bc 20.08 bc 57.03 b 45.23 bc<br />

T5 2 x 10 12 13.73 b 39.46 b 33.03 bc 19.47 b 42.80 b 33.84 b 21.83 b 61.80 b 49.53 b<br />

T6<br />

Dimethoate 30 EC<br />

@ 1.7 ml/litre<br />

39.75 a 50.47 a 45.50 a 62.98 a 72.73 a 63.38 a 80.35 a 89.97 a 83.57 a<br />

T 7 Untreated control 5.26 c 7.92 d 11.48 e 7.65 e 8.56 d 9.46 d 9.78 d 14.57 d 14.57 f<br />

DAA – Days after application<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


The fungal spray at higher dosage (1.2 x 10 12 ) after 7 days of second and third spray<br />

only showed more than 50 per cent of mortality. The concentrations 2 x 10 12 and 2 x 10 10<br />

performed at par with each other and significantly superior to all doses of V. lecanii at 7 DAS<br />

and this trend continued at 14 DAS after the first and third spray.<br />

Even at the lowest dose V. lecanii was significantly superior to untreated only at 7<br />

and 14 DAS. After first spray there was no significant difference between all the doses of V.<br />

lecanii and untreated control at 3 DAS, but inferior to chemical spray became evident (Table<br />

45). However observations showed no difference between highest dose of V. lecanii (2 x 10 12 )<br />

and succeeding dose (2 x 10 10 ). Conversely, the lowest dose (2 x 10 5 ) failed as badly as<br />

untreated check throughout the study period at third day after each spray (Table 45).<br />

Dimethoate, efficiently knocked down at the third day of first spray and continued to<br />

maintain its effectiveness throughout the observation period.<br />

4.12 CHEMICAL MUTATION<br />

UV radiation<br />

The conidial suspension of Ma2 and Vl1 exposed to UV radiation at 5 cms from UV<br />

bulb resulted in an optimum killing percentage of 99.97 per cent. From the stock of<br />

mutagenized survivors, totally twelve mutants from Vl1 and twelve mutants from Ma2 strain<br />

were developed.<br />

The test insects (H. armigera and B. brassicae) exhibited mortality to all mutants.<br />

However, the mortality of V. lecanii mutants values ranged from minimum of 32.59 to<br />

maximum of 91.97 per cent during the study (Table 46). Among Vl1 derived mutants highest<br />

cumulative mortality of 91.97 per cent was observed on VA2, but failed to differ statistically<br />

from other mutants, VA5 (90.56%), VA11 (91.96%) and VA12 (89.36%). The lowest mortality<br />

was recorded with VA9 with only 32.59 per cent.<br />

The M2 derived mutants exhibited moderate pathogenicity of H. armigera. The<br />

mortality ranged from 36.50 in MH12 to 91.67 in MH4 and was on par with MH2 (90.92%).<br />

The next best mutant was MH8 (82.75%) followed by MH5 (77.10%) and held type V1<br />

(73.96%).


Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Table 45. Per cent reduction of nymph of Aphis crassivora on cowpea due to Verticillium lecanii (Vl3) under field conditions<br />

Treatments<br />

I spray II spray III spray<br />

3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA 3 DAA 7 DAA 14 DAA<br />

T1 2 x 10 5 10.74 b 17.41 d 17.50 cd 19.50 c 24.00 f 29.33 e 13.57 cd 18.37 f 21.90 c<br />

T2 2 x 10 6 10.74 b 17.78 d 21.48 c 20.17 c 28.67 e 34.00 e 14.43 cd 21.87 e 29.50 d<br />

T3 2 x 10 8 13.93 b 24.83 c 32.70 b 20.73 c 34.67 d 38.83 d 16.33 c 26.33 d 35.83 c<br />

T4 2 x 10 10 18.24 b 40.65 b 32.78 b 31.08 b 53.17 c 46.50 c 18.28 c 45.80 c 39.00 bc<br />

T 5 2 x 10 12 18.33 b 46.67 b 32.50 b 32.50 b 66.50 b 54.67 b 24.60 b 51.13 b 40.70 b<br />

T6<br />

Dimethoate 30 EC<br />

@ 1.7 ml/litre<br />

51.51 a 66.28 a 48.86 a 74.17 a 87.33 a 81.73 a 58.08 a 75.28 a 64.67 a<br />

T7 Untreated control 10.74 b 11.67 d 11.67 d 16.33 c 19.33 g 20.83 f 12.83 d 16.00 f 16.00 c<br />

DAA – Days after application<br />

In vertical columns means followed by similar letters do not significantly different (p=0.05)


Table 46. Effect of wild types and derived mutants (UV) of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae (Ma2) Helicoverpa armigera and Verticillium lecanii (Vl1)<br />

Sl. No. Strains Per cent mortality<br />

1 Metarhizium anisopliae Ma2 (Wild<br />

type)<br />

73.96 ef<br />

Mutants<br />

2 MH1 64.20 g<br />

3 MH2 90.92 a<br />

4 MH3 73.81 ef<br />

5 MH4 91.67 a<br />

6 MH5 77.10 e<br />

7 MH6 53.77 h<br />

8 MH7 39.60 ij<br />

9 MH8 82.75 b<br />

10 MH9 71.75 f<br />

11 MH10 43.06 l<br />

12 MH11 65.75 g<br />

13 MH12 36.50 l<br />

14 Verticillium lecanii Vl1 (Wild type) 82.62 b<br />

Mutants<br />

15 VA1 83.77 b<br />

16 VA2 91.97 a<br />

17 VA3 64.75 g<br />

18 VA4 77.14 de<br />

19 VA5 90.56 a<br />

20 VA6 53.87 h<br />

21 VA7 81.96 be<br />

22 VA8 79.00 cd<br />

23 VA9 32.59 k<br />

24 VA10 83.16 b<br />

25 VA11 91.96 a<br />

26 VA12 89.36 a<br />

Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.01)


V. DISCUSSION<br />

Insect pathogenic fungi, often not realized by man, naturally and efficiently restrict the<br />

build up of insect pests without any interference. This part of the ‘Law of Natural Balance’ is<br />

being inadvertently destroyed by the indiscriminate use of chemical pesticides. This has led to<br />

the notion that, all forms of pest control should be integrated and environmentally acceptable<br />

to the agricultural ecosystem. It is certain that entomogenous fungi will continue to increase<br />

their share very rapidly in the integrated pest management.<br />

Mycopathogens infect insects through cuticle and are therefore, the principle<br />

pathogens among sucking insects which cannot ingest other pathogens that infect through<br />

the gut wall (Hajek and Ledger, 1994). More than 750 species of entomopathogenic fungi<br />

have been described (Maddox, 1994), of which only ten species have been extensively<br />

exploited. Current research efforts were directed at selecting native entomopathogenic fungi,<br />

characterizing them assessing their virulence and developing a formulation for them.<br />

Additionally, their compatability with certain pesticides, genetic enhancement and field<br />

evaluation was conducted. The results obtained are discussed herein.<br />

5.1 EXPLORATION <strong>OF</strong> THE NATURAL OCCURRENCE <strong>OF</strong><br />

INSECT MYCOPATHOGENS IN NORTHERN KARNATAKA<br />

Extensive work in the area of isolation, characterization and exploitation of<br />

entomopathogenic fungi needs to be a continuous excercise. Understanding the ecology and<br />

molecular diversity of the pathogen is of immense importance in exploiting the<br />

biotechnological potential of the pathogens. Hence, the present work undertook an extensive<br />

and repeated survey covering different agro ecological niches of northern Karnataka. The<br />

present study focused on collection of insect cadavers that were presumed to be fungal<br />

infected. Extensive variation in the per cent incidence was observed. The incidence of<br />

mycopathogens collected during the survey is indicated in the Fig. 1. Wide spread incidence<br />

was observed with respect to M. anisopliae, V. lecanii, B. brassiana and F. oxysoporum.<br />

Amongst the different mycopathogens, N. rileyi had the highest natural incidence (30-80%) in<br />

the transitional belt of northern Karnataka. The natural incidence of C. sphaerospermum was<br />

higher in Dharwad and was observed to parasitize ligeid bug (18.58%). The natural incidence<br />

of M. anisopliae varied from 1.8 to 10.3 per cent and was maximum on diamond black moth,<br />

pest that prevailed on cabbage at Hirebagewadi. The incidence of C. cladosporides and A.<br />

candidus was less than 10 per cent. These results indicated a high variability of disease<br />

incidence due to mycopathogen attack.<br />

The variability observed in the disease incidence could be due to the prevalence of<br />

different agro climatic conditions. The incidence of M. anisopliae was seen across two<br />

contrasting ecological niche i.e., Dharwad which, had a relative humidity of 80-89 per cent<br />

and a temperature of 26.5-27.7°C and Gangavathi which had a lower relative humidity of 75-<br />

78 per cent and higher temperature 30-32.5°C. The ability of these to grow at varying<br />

temperature upto 35-37°C, indeed, has been observed (Yip et al., 1992). The present result<br />

also indicate the potential to use M. anisopliae as biopesticide under contrasting<br />

environments.<br />

5.2 <strong>ISOLATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>CHARACTERIZATION</strong> <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI<br />

The cadavers of susceptible host brought to the laboratory and those presumed to be<br />

infected by M. anisopliae and V. lecanii were used for isolation of the mycopathogen. A total<br />

of seven fungi were isolated, purified and identified based on their colony characteristic and<br />

microscopic examination. The origin of the isolates and the host are shown in the (Table 5<br />

and Fig. 1). Of the seven, four were identified to be M. anisopliae and three were assigned to<br />

V. lecanii. The identity of the fungi was later confirmed at Agarkar Research Institute, Pune.


The hyphal and conidial characters did not vary among the isolates collected from<br />

different places during survey. However, V. lecanii exhibited significant variation in the<br />

number of days taken for sporulation, sporulation, spore yield and time taken to cover the<br />

given diet for mass production. Among the different isolates of V. lecanii, Vl1 recorded highest<br />

colony diameter (52.13) but least spore yield (4.21x10 9 ). The Ma2 and Ma1 isolates recorded<br />

higher colony diameter of 42.30 mm and 38.60 mm respectively. In these two isolates, the<br />

sporulation commenced two to three days earlier than isolates Ma3 and Ma4. These results<br />

indicate variability among the isolates which need to be realised when being used for<br />

development of effective bioinoculant and mass production.<br />

5.3 TESTING <strong>OF</strong> EFFICACY <strong>OF</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2)<br />

<strong>AND</strong> Verticillium lecanii (Vl1) AGAINST DIFFERENT<br />

INSECT PESTS<br />

The pathogenicity of isolates Vl1 and Ma2 was tested against various insect pest (B.<br />

brassiae, A. crassivora, M. sacchari, P. latus, A. disperses, H. armigera and O. rhinoceros).<br />

The pathogenicity was highly variable (51.35 to 94.50 per cent). Vl1 caused maximum<br />

pathogenicity in case of cabbage aphid B. brassica (94.50%). It also caused extensive<br />

damage against cowpea aphid A. crassivora (84.23%). Ma2 was highly pathogenic against H.<br />

armigera and O. rhinocerous. The toxicity of M. anisopliae against O. rihoceros has been<br />

reported by Gopalkrishnan and Narayanan (1988). These results indicate the possibility of<br />

using V. lecanii on aphids (B. brassica and A. crassivora) and M. anisopliae on H. armigera<br />

and O. rhinoceros. The wide variability observed indicates further exploration could result in<br />

isolation of more potent strains. It would also help to extend the host species. One of the<br />

ways in which the population of M. anisopliae could be enhanced in culture bank would be to<br />

isolate M. anisopliae from soil on a selective medium containing 10 µm/ml of dodine (Ndodecyl<br />

guanidine monoacetate) (Liu et al., 1993).<br />

In fungal cells, dodine induces the loss of 32 P (Brown and Sisler, 1960), P1, amino<br />

acids and UV absorbing materials and increases the permeability of the cytoplasmic<br />

membrane to externally added Ni 2+ (Miller and Barran, 1977). In plant cells, dodine induces<br />

an efflux of betacyanin and total ions. Other cationic amphiphiles (namely, cetyltrimethylammonium<br />

bromide, chlorohexidine and polymyxins) have been reported to cause severe<br />

damage to the cytoplasmic membrane in several bacterial species (Newton, 1956). Using<br />

dodine in the medium, thus would enhance the probability of isolating diverse and perhaps<br />

more effective strains.<br />

5.4 INFLUENCE <strong>OF</strong> DIFFERENT NUTRIENT SOURCES<br />

One of the key factor in enhancing the population of mycopathogens propagules in<br />

the inoculum is the availability the nutrients. Several attempts have been made to multiply<br />

these mycopathogens using semi synthetic and solid substrate primarily to cut down cost of<br />

production. Additionally, the availability of nutrients also influences the survival of these<br />

organisms in nature. Carbon and nitrogen are the most vital nutrients required for growth and<br />

sporulation (Campbell et al., 1983). Therefore, the effect of different carbohydrates and<br />

nitrogen on the growth of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii was evaluated at different<br />

concentrations in Czapeckdox broth. The nutritional requirement of the fungi in both species<br />

and strain varied. Starch supported the highest growth of M. anisopliae Ma2 (6.01 gm/250 ml)<br />

followed by fructose and sucrose. In case V. lecanii Vl1 too, the maximum biomass was<br />

obtained when grown on starch followed by sucrose. Soluble starch has been reported to be<br />

the best substrate tested for sporulation of M. anisopliae strain when grown on soypeptone<br />

based medium (Li and Holdom, 1994) and hence has been recommended to be useful carbon<br />

source in the production media. In earlier studies, the most effective carbon source for<br />

sporulation of N. rileyi were reported to be dextrose (IM et al., 1988) and Maltose (Balardrin<br />

and Loch, 1989). Edelstein et al. (2004) on the other hand found that media with potato<br />

extract induced higher growth rate.


For continuous growth and extension of the hyphae and to prevent autolysis, an<br />

exogenous nitrogen source is required (Smith and Grula, 1981). Hence, certain nitrogen<br />

source were tested. Among them KNO 3 (5.769/250 ml) was found to be the best source<br />

followed by NH4NO3 for biomass production of M. anisopliae Ma2. However, when NaNO3<br />

was used as a nitrogen source, there was reduction in the growth. Vl2 on the other hand grew<br />

better in the medium supplemented with (NH4)SO4 and least with medium supplemented with<br />

KNO3. In an earlier study KNO3 was found to be better for better growth and sporulation than<br />

(NH 4)SO 4 (Li and Holdom, 1994). The use of NH 4 ion is known to acidify the media much<br />

more than NO3. It is known that the acidity at certain levels encourages the growth of fungi<br />

beyond certain limits probably is responsible for the sporulation as inferred by Rath et al.<br />

(1995), while characterizing M. anisopliae strain on different source of organic acids as<br />

carbon sources.<br />

5.5 COST EFFECTIVE MASS MULTIPLICATION <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI<br />

Ensuring survival and persistence of the fungi is one of the greatest challenges of<br />

mycoinsecticide formulation and this technology has to be optimized for individual species or<br />

even strains (Burges, 1998). Inexpensive culture medium is required in order to increase the<br />

benefit:cost ratio. Hence, several sources were tested for mass multiplication.<br />

Food grains<br />

Low cost sources of nutrients like bajra, sorghum, navane, maize, rice and wheat<br />

were assessed for their utility in terms of conidial yield of M. anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii<br />

Vl1. It was found that growth of Ma2 on bajra yielded the maximum conidia (22.47 x 10 8<br />

conidia/g of substrate) Vl1 on the other grew better and produced more conidia on rice grains<br />

(24.59 x 10 8 conidia/g). It has been earlier shown that fungi could be multiplied on polished<br />

rice grains (Silva and Loch, 1987) and crushed sorghum (Vimaladevi, 1994). The high amount<br />

of conidia in bajra and rice could be due to maltose released by the action of starch<br />

hydrolyzing enzymes present in the fungus induces sporulation. Disaccharide like maltose are<br />

known to induce more sporulation in unicellular fungi, Hansenula than monosaccharides<br />

(Crandall and Lawrence, 1980). Since chitinase and exochitinase activities are low in conidia<br />

and germinating seeds (Preez et al., 1985), crushing of grains is necessary to release the<br />

substrate for action of amylase. This indicates that rice and bajra grits as economical sources<br />

of mass production of M. anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1. The use of such grains as low<br />

cost and rapid technique to produce mycopathogen compared to expensive and synthetic<br />

SMAY medium has been suggested earlier too (Vimaladevi, 1994, 1996).<br />

During the present study, wheat and navane grains proved inferior for spore<br />

production, perhaps due to less content of starch in wheat (53%) and thus led low<br />

productivity. However, wheat is also known to have appreciable amounts of protein. Higher<br />

nitrogen has been shown to be necessary for mycelial growth of fungi (Riba and Glander,<br />

1980; IM et al., 1988) and thus could be reason for lower spore yield are profused mycelial<br />

growth. Pilot studies using substrate fermentation will help to confirm these findings.<br />

Agro-wastes<br />

Accumulation of agro-wastes, post harvest of economically important plant part<br />

accounts for 300-500 million ton/year (Patel and Yadav, 1990). To utilize such agro-waste<br />

more efficiently, their utility in supporting the growth of Ma2 and Vl1 was assessed by using<br />

crushed maize cobs, wheat bran, rice bran, bagasse and pressmud singly and along with 10<br />

per cent molasses supplementation. Rice bran supported the maximum growth of both Ma2<br />

and Vl1 followed by wheat bran. When supplemented with 10 per cent molasses, the conidial<br />

yield increased two folds. On the other hand, growth and sporulation of both Ma2 and Vl1 was<br />

completely absent on bagasse and pressmud. Maize cobs also did not show any growth of<br />

Vl1.


In an earlier experiment, bagasse was shown to support multiplication (Silva and<br />

Loch, 1987) of N. rileyi. When 10 per cent molasses was supplemented to N. rileyi, the spore<br />

yield was almost on par with wheat bran. These results indicate that, addition of molasses<br />

could increase the conidial yield of entomopathogenic fungi when grown on different agro<br />

wastes. Refined experiment using other easily available nutrient sources like corn steap liquor<br />

will probably yield more information on the utility of different agrowastes for production of<br />

mycopathogen.<br />

5.6 TOXICITY <strong>OF</strong> PESTICIDES TO Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma2)<br />

<strong>AND</strong> Verticillium lecanii (Vl1)<br />

Compatibility with other agents for pest control or with naturally occurring mortality<br />

agents are important in developing strategies for the efficient utilization of entomopathogens<br />

in the integrated pest management. Deleterious effects or enhanced activity resulting from<br />

integrating of control agents will have a major impact on the role of potential of<br />

entomopathogens in IPM options.<br />

Among the three types of pesticides studied for their compatibility with M. anisopliae<br />

Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1 in the present investigation, weedicides were least inhibitory followed<br />

by insecticides. But, the fungicides on the other hand were highly detrimental to the<br />

entomopathogenic fungi and higher toxicity of fungicides to the mycopathogens as compared<br />

to other agro chemicals have been presented in the earlier findings (Ignoffo et al., 1975;<br />

Kulkarni, 1999; Patil, 2000).<br />

Fungicides<br />

All the fungicides in vitro inhibited the conidial germination of M. anisopliae Ma2 and<br />

V. lecanii Vl1 considerably at low, medium, recommended and high dose (table 18 and 19<br />

respectively). Propiconazole and mancozeb being highly detrimental prevented the conidial<br />

germination of M. anisopliae Ma2. In addition to these two fungicides, chlorothalonil and<br />

carbendazim also inhibited the germination V. lecanii Vl1 totally triadimefon and chlorothalonil<br />

were comparatively safe allowing 35-39 per cent conidia of M. anisopliae to germinate on the<br />

media and only iprodione proved to be relatively safer with V. lecanii allowing 41.50 per cent<br />

conidia.<br />

Inhibition of the fungus growth by different fungicides even at the 1/10 th of the<br />

recommended dose was observed by Ignoffo et al. (1975). High toxicity of carbendazim and<br />

mancozeb to the fungus N. rileyi has been reported by Kulkarni (1999). According to<br />

Gopalkrishna and Mohan (2000), chlorothalonil and wettable sulphur were completely safe to<br />

the fungus, but the results of the present study, contrast their study with an observed per cent<br />

inhibition 100 and 96.57 per cent with M. anisopliae Ma2 and 64.01 and 74.84 per cent<br />

inhibition in case of V. lecanii Vl1 germination respectively. In general, N. rileyi has been<br />

adversely affected by many fungicides (Roberts and Campbell, 1977). Teddeur (1981)<br />

reported Triphenyltin hydroxids to be more toxic to M. anisopliae and B. bassiana.<br />

Triadimefon and Iprodione were relatively safer giving an indication that these<br />

fungicides can be compatible with the both (M. anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1)<br />

mycopathogen in field and it may be feasible to mix the fungicides with higher loads of<br />

inoculum as practiced with seed coating of seed with biofertilizer and pesticides. However, it<br />

has to be confirmed under field situation.<br />

Insecticides<br />

Combination of synthetic insecticides and microbial insecticides have been used to<br />

stress the insect population thus making them more susceptible to disease (Roberts and<br />

Campbell, 1977). The results of the present study reveal significant variation in the toxicity of<br />

insecticides representing different groups to M. anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1. The<br />

detrimental effects on the mycopathogen increased with concentration.


Dichlorvos and monocrotophos were highly detrimental to the mycopathogen M.<br />

anisopliae Ma2 inhibiting 54.22 and 54.89 per cent of growth respectively. In case of V. lecanii<br />

Vl1 malathion, quinolphos, dicofol and oxydimeton methyl were highly toxic. Malathion and<br />

dimethoate inhibited at lesser levels in case of M. anisopliae Ma2. Other insecticides including<br />

endosulfon and chlorpyriphos proved less toxic to V. lecanii Vl1. The observed difference<br />

could be due to inherent variability in chemical properties of the two insecticides.<br />

Inhibitory effects of insecticides to mycopathogens under both in vitro and in vivo<br />

have been reported. Inhibition of fungus N. rileyi by chlorpyrifos (Ignoffo, 1981) and<br />

endosulfan (Silva et al., 1993) has been documented even at the lowest concentrations.<br />

Similar detrimental effect of thiodicarb (Barbosa et al., 1997), carboryl (Kulkarni, 1999;<br />

Gopalkrishnan and Mohan, 2000) and fenvalerate (Gopalkrishnan and Mohan, 2000) to the<br />

entomopathogen has been reported. Additionally, profenfos (Silva et al., 1993) was found<br />

inhibit sporulation.<br />

Lesser inhibition of the mycopathogen in the present study by dimethoate supports<br />

the observations of Gopalkrishnan and Mohan (2000) who reported dimethoate at different<br />

concentration were safe to N. rileyi.<br />

These results indicate that care is to be advised when these entomopathogens are<br />

applied along with the pesticides. Separation of time of application between the chemical and<br />

the pathogen may be advocated. However, field studies may add more information.<br />

Weedicides<br />

Weedicides are often used to suppress the weeds to the increase the availability of<br />

nutrients to crop plants through reduction of competition and allelopathic effects. When<br />

compared to insecticides and fungicides, the weedicides in general inhibited germination of<br />

conidia in the range of 14 to 29 per cent. Since the weedicides are applied to soil, the effect<br />

on plants and the persistence of mycopathogens in the agril ecosystem need to be looked<br />

into in a proper perspective. Since the effect as noticed in this study is not that very drastic,<br />

the dilution of weedicides in soil would not cause reduction in the population of these<br />

entomopathogens. Hence, application of weedicides in the event of a mycopathogen spray<br />

can be considered largely as safe. In an earlier study some of the herbicides were considered<br />

to be inhibitory to N. rileyi (Ignoffo et al., 1975). But largely the effects of herbicides on<br />

conidial germination are non detrimental (Tang and Hou, 1998). Since weedicides have been<br />

designed to be highly specific to certain groups of plants, it might not largely effect the fungi.<br />

5.7 PERSISTENCE<br />

Natural epizootics under favorable conditions have been documented to naturally<br />

control the pests. However, their subsequent use in next season needs the presence of the<br />

propagules of the mycopathogenic fungi in the agro systems. In the event of a natural<br />

epizootic in one season or external application of entomopathogenic fungi to control an insect<br />

outbreak, there is a release of lot of these mycelia and conidia into the environment. The<br />

subsequent effect of these inocula in the event of further outbreak is determined largely by<br />

the persistence of conidia in the environment. Soil by large are the natural niche where they<br />

can persist. Phylloplane also could be a niche for growth and multiplication of these fungi. To<br />

understand the persistence of Ma2 and Vl1, cotton leaves as well as soil beneath was<br />

sprayed with inoculum of Ma2 and Vl1.<br />

In case of Vl1, there was a continuous decrease in the population till 30 th day, after<br />

which the organism did not persist. In soil, however there was increase in population up till<br />

20 th day which later dropped down to a very low level beyond 75 days. The low persistence of<br />

Vl1 could be due to the inhibitory effect of sunlight. It is known that the half life of spores of N.<br />

rileyi had reduced to 3.6 h mainly as a result of UV radiation (Fargues et al., 1983). Since the<br />

soil is not a very favorable condition for rapid multiplication, it is possible that there is highly<br />

reduced growth of the mycopathogenes. Such reduced persistence of conidia has been<br />

observed in soil earlier (Vimaladevi, 1995).


M. anisopliae exhibited rapid reduction in population and dropped down to very low<br />

levels (8.65% and 5.51% of the original population in case of phylloplane and soil<br />

respectively). Thus, the results indicate that soil and phylloplane cannot be expected to<br />

support the growth of mycopathogens and repeated application of these mycopathogens in<br />

the event of insect outbreak or as a prophylactic measure is necessary.<br />

Formulation<br />

Formulation basically comprises of additives to preserve organisms, deliver them to<br />

targets and once there, to improve their activity. The concentration of an organism that has<br />

been formulated is termed as formulation. All formulations may not be useful on all the crop<br />

pests. Hence, its necessary to modify them by certain additives which is done normally at the<br />

time of application. The final formulation is termed as tank mix (Burges and Jones, 1998). A<br />

wide variety of approaches for formulation is available ranging from production of liquid<br />

suspensions to solid briquettes.<br />

In this study, an experiment was performed to understand the survival of M.<br />

anisopliae Ma2 and V. lecanii Vl1 in different oil based and wettable powder formulations. The<br />

influence of different storage temperature and time of storage was also studied.<br />

At the end of 20 days after storage, no significant difference was obtained amongst<br />

different oil based and wettable powder at different storage temperatures. Even at the end of<br />

75 days, significant difference on the survival of conidia did not exist in different oil based and<br />

wettable powder formation in refrigerated condition. At the end of 45 days, formulation of 75<br />

per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil formulation and 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent<br />

sorghum flour was found to be the best and significantly different from other formulations. In<br />

the earthen pot however, the survival of M. anisopliae was best in the formulation, 75 per cent<br />

conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil.<br />

At 75 days after incubation, the survival of M. anisopliae was better at both room<br />

temperature and earthern pot in wettable powder formulation containing 75 per cent conidia +<br />

25 per cent sorghum flour, than other formulations. The result was similar at 90 day after<br />

incubation, but at 120 and 150 days of incubation, the survival of M. anisopliae Ma2 was<br />

better in 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil in both room temperature and<br />

earthern pot storage.<br />

In case of V. lecanii Vl1, however, significant difference was not observed at the end<br />

of 20 th day both at refrigerated and earthern pot storage condition. The survival was highest in<br />

the formulation 75 per cent conidia plus 25 per cent sunflower oil both in refrigerated and<br />

earthern pot storage conditions. When a higher percentage of sunflower oil (50%) was used,<br />

the survival ability in case of V. lecanii Vl1 reduced. The highest rate of survival in case of V.<br />

lecanii Vl1 was found in formulations 75 per cent conidia + 25 per cent sunflower oil at all<br />

days of incubation and at all storage temperature.<br />

The results indicate that oil formulation containing 75 per cent conidia 25 per cent<br />

sunflower oil was the best formulation having highest survival ability of spores. It has been<br />

proved that vegetable oils are preferable for developing formulations to minimize toxicity<br />

especially if rancidity and solidification during storage (Couch and Ignoffo, 1981). It has also<br />

been expressed that formulation of entomofungal pathogen in oils increase their effectiveness<br />

(Prior et al., 1988) probably by preventing conidial dessication, increasing adhesion,<br />

(Vimaladevi and Prasad, 1996). Stathers et al. (1993) found that soyabean oil maintained<br />

good viability for 14 weeks. Using wettable powders has its own problems which include<br />

avoiding settling in tanks during sprays, or adhesion of binders. This problem can overcome if<br />

formulations are in oil.<br />

Mutagenesis<br />

Fungi have been found to be promising biological agents. In this study, the<br />

insecticidal activity of M. anisopliae and V. lecanii has been studied. Genetic improvements of<br />

entomopathogenic fungi has been less attempted, primarily due to the limited use and the<br />

complexicity of the genome. However, mutagenesis has been employed as a tool to improve


the metabolic activity (Paris and Ferron, 1971). UV rays that causes alkylation and has been<br />

found effective in mutagenesing fungi has been employed in this study. Randomly picked<br />

colonies of V. lecanii and M. anisopliae that came up on SMAY agar on plating the mutant<br />

bank were picked up and analysed for their insecticidal activity. Four UV mutants of V. lecanii<br />

(VA2, VA5, VA11 and VA12) were found to be more toxic to aphids B. brassicae. The mutants<br />

of M. anisopliae Ma2 including MH2, MH4, MH8 and MH12 showed higher pathogencity to H.<br />

armigera. The highest mortality was observed in case of VA2 (91.97%) and MH4 (91.67%) on<br />

B. brassicae and H. armigera respectively. The mutants VA2 and MH4 showed 11.3 per cent<br />

and 23.94 per cent higher mortality over the wild type respectively.<br />

The results obtained indicate the potential of chemical and UV mutagenesis in<br />

improving the toxicity of entomopathogens. Mutants of M. anisopliae and Paelomyces<br />

farinosus have been generated earlier which were significantly more virulent. It is possible<br />

that more vigorous mutagenesis and wider screening will enable identification of more potent<br />

strains.<br />

Evaluation of potency of V. lecanii Vl1 against selected crop pests<br />

The effect of V. lecanii Vl1 was initially tested on B. brassicae and A. disperses in<br />

laboratory using different dosages of conidia. The per cent mortality was observed after<br />

different days of inoculation. The per cent mortality (92.3%) progressively increased upto 10<br />

days after inoculation. At 10 days, the maximum mortality of B. brassicae was observed when<br />

1.2 x 10 9 conidia/ml was used. The per cent mortality (80.95%) of A. disperses during the<br />

same period was also the highest when 1.2 x 10 9 conidia/ml inoculum was used. However, in<br />

an earlier study (Masuda and Kikachi, 1992), it was found that higher concentration (10 7 to<br />

10 8 conidia/ml) was enough to cause 96-100 per cent mortality on A. gossypii by V. lecanii.<br />

The results indicate variability of pathogencity of V. lecanii on the two insect tested. V.<br />

lecanii was found to be more toxic to B. brassicae than A. disperses. The effect of V. lecanii<br />

has been reported earlier on Trialeurodes vaporariorum and B. tabaci which reported a per<br />

cent mortality of 91 and 100 using a inoculum of 3.2 x 10 6 . The effectiveness of the fungus, V.<br />

lecanii has been proved against Myzus persicae (Khalil et al., 1990; Milner and Lutton, 1986).<br />

Having known the potential of V. lecanii to be toxic to B. brassiae, A. disperses in<br />

laboratory condition, a field experiment was laid out in order to assess the performance of the<br />

entomopathogen on B. brassicae and Apis crassivora. The mortality in the field was however,<br />

lower when the same dosage was used 10 days after inoculation.<br />

Among the three isolates, Vl1 application showed higher rate of mortality (61.16%) of<br />

B. brassicae followed by Vl3 (50.17%). Overall, the efficacy of fungus was more effective at<br />

higher concentration and high exposure period than lower concentration and low exposure<br />

period.<br />

The reduction in toxicity in the field could be due to several reasons including the<br />

harmful effects of UV rays on the fungal pathogen itself (Ignoffo et al., 1976), less accessibility<br />

of the pathogen to the insect pest and dispersal of the conidia due to wind. Hence, sprays<br />

with higher initial population and additional sprays are required to augment the biocontrol<br />

potential in field. The lower effectiveness could be also due to the low humidity prevented<br />

during the period of experiment.<br />

All the five dosages of V. lecanii proved their supremacy to uninoculated treatments.<br />

Comparatively, the highest dosage (2 x 10 12 conidia/ha) caused 61.6 per cent mortality of B.<br />

brassicae after second spray which was lesser than the mortality caused by the<br />

recommended spray of dimethoate 30 EC (@ 1.7 ml/l) which resulted in 87.53 per cent.<br />

However, the results indicated that the fungus Vl1 at higher dosage (2 x 10 12 conidia/ha) did<br />

not lag much.<br />

All the dosages of V. lecanii isolates against A. crassivora proved their superiority<br />

over untreated treatment. Among the three isolates, Vl3, caused highest mortality of 66.50 per<br />

cent after second spray of higher dosage (2 x 10 12 conidia/ha). Dimethoate maintained their<br />

supremacy over the mycopathogen throughout the experimental period recording significantly


higher mortality of aphids. The commercial formulation Vertalec was found to control whitefly<br />

and aphid effectively at 10-13 h at ≥97 per cent relative humidity in Japan (Hall, 1982).<br />

The lower mortality of fungus than chemicals may be due to the fact that chemical<br />

insecticides were quick in action and hence reduced the whitefly population considerably. The<br />

entomopathogen which acted slowly on the pest allowed them to live on the plant, until the<br />

incubation period of the disease was completed (Miranpuri and Khachatourians, 1995).<br />

FUTURE LINE <strong>OF</strong> WORK<br />

1. Extensive exploration of diverse areas and environmental niches need to be done.<br />

2. Mutagenesis of the isolates need to be done on more vigorous note and larger<br />

screening need to be done.<br />

3. Refinement of formulation and development of application technology to enhance the<br />

effectiveness of the fungus under field conditions.<br />

4. Genetic/molecular diversity of the isolate need to be done in order to develop an<br />

inoculum consortia containing diverse strains.<br />

5. The molecular basis of toxicity needs to analyse to attempt further exploitation of<br />

these mycopathogens.


VI. SUMMARY<br />

Investigations were carried out on isolation and characterisation of native<br />

entomopathogenic fungi and their effectiveness from 1999 to 2002 at the University of<br />

Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. The results obtained are summarized herein.<br />

1. Nine insect mycopathogens, belonging to seven genera were found naturally occurring in<br />

the nine districts of northern Karnataka. Of these, Nomuraea rileyi was most<br />

predominantly found followed by Metarhizium anisopliae and Verticillum lecanii.<br />

2. Studies on morphological variation among the field collected isolates of M. anisopliae and<br />

V. lecanii for various parameters like, hyphal and conidial characters, sporulation and<br />

spore yield revealed that Ma2 and Ma1 proved superior to Ma3 and Ma4. In case of V.<br />

lecanii, V13 showed higher spore yield than Vl1 and Vl2. However, it took maximum time<br />

(10-14 days) to cover the entire diet.<br />

3. Pathogenicity of V. lecanii to aphids, whitefly and mites and M. anisopliae on American<br />

bollworms and Rhinocerous beetle was proved in laboratory.<br />

4. Among the different isolates of V. lecanii and M. anisopliae evaluated against B.<br />

brassicae and H. armigera, Vl1 and Ma2 recorded maximum mortality of 94.50 per cent<br />

and 87.50 per cent respectively.<br />

5. Analysis of the effect of different carbon sources on the biomass of Vl1 and Ma2 revealed<br />

that starch was the superior sugar source for both the mycopathogens and (NH4)SO4 and<br />

KNO3 as nitrogen source for Vl1 and Ma2 respectively.<br />

6. Evaluation of food grains for suitability for mass production of Ma2 and Vl1 revealed that<br />

conidial growth increased with increase in duration after inoculation. Bajra and rice grains<br />

served as most productive media for conidial growth of Ma2 and Vl1 with an yield of 22.77<br />

x 10 8 and 24.59 x 10 8 conidia per gram of media, respectively.<br />

7. Among the low cost agro-wastes tested for their suitability for the mass production of<br />

mycopathogens, rice bran with 10 per cent molasses supported better growth and<br />

conidial production of Ma2 and Vl2.<br />

8. All the fungicides tested for their interaction with Ma2 inhibited the conidial germination<br />

(19.90 to 100%). However, iprodione and chlorothalonil were safer with 38.69 per cent<br />

69.21 per cent conidial germination.<br />

9. In case of Vl1, complete inhibition (24.10 to 100%) of conidia was observed. However<br />

iprodione and triadimeton allowed maximum of 37.38 and 41.62 per cent conidia to<br />

germinate respectively.<br />

10. Among insecticides, dichlorvos (55.89%) and malathion (69.18%) were significantly<br />

detrimental to Ma2 and Vl1 respectively. Conversely, malathion (34.33%) and<br />

endosulfon (37.31%) were safer for Ma2 and Vl1 respectively.<br />

11. All weedicides tested for their interactions with Ma2 (9.01 to 41.95%) and Vl1 (8.65 to<br />

36.12%) in general, inhibited the germination of the fungal conidia. In general, fungicides<br />

were most detrimental to the mycopathogen than insecticides and weedicides.<br />

12. The persistence of mycopathogens (Ma2 and Vl1) was higher in soil (upto 16 months)<br />

than in phylloplane (upto 3 months).<br />

13. In general, all the carrier material had more conidial viability when stored in refrigerated<br />

and deep freezer condition and a reduction of more than 10 per cent and 8 per cent in<br />

refrigerated and deep freezer was observed after 150 DAS respectively.


14. Oil formulations proved better than wettable powder. Among oil formulations, sunflower<br />

oil proved to be best with maximum of 38 and 54.13 per cent germination at room<br />

temperature after 150 days of storage.<br />

15. Among the different concentrations of V. lecanii evaluated in laboratory against B.<br />

brassicae and Aleurodicus disperses, higher dosage of V. lecanii (1.2 x 10 9 conidia/ha)<br />

was found effective with highest mortality of 92.30 per cent and 80.93 per cent on the<br />

10 th day after spraying respectively.<br />

16. A comparative account of efficacy of different isolates of V. lecanii under field conditions<br />

were evaluated against B. brassicae and A. crassivora. At the highest dosage of all<br />

isolates (2 x 10 12 conidia/ha), Vl1 proved most potent against B. brassicae (61.16%<br />

mortality), whereas Vl3 showed better control against A. crassivora (66.50%).<br />

17. The UV radiation mutants of mycopathogen (Ma2 and Vl1) exhibited 91.67 and 91.67<br />

per cent higher mortality on H. armigera and B. brassicae than the respective wild type<br />

(73.96 and 82.62%).


VII. REFERENCES<br />

ALLEN, G.E., GREENE, G.L. <strong>AND</strong> WHITCOMB, W.H., 1971, An epizootic of Spicario rileyi on<br />

the velvet beat caterpillar, Anticarsia gemmatalis in Florida. Florida Entomologist,<br />

54: 189-191.<br />

AMBETHGAR, V., 1991, Biochemistry of epizootics of the fly fungus, Pandora delphacis<br />

(hort.) Humber in the rice brown plant hopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal),<br />

M.Sc.(Agri.) Thesis, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India.<br />

AMBETHGAR, V., 1997, Record of white muscardius fungus, Beauveria bassiana (Bals.)<br />

Vuill. On rice leaf folder complex from Karaikol. Pondicherry Union Territory<br />

(India). Journal of Entomological Research, 21: 197-199.<br />

AMBETHGAR, V., LAKSHMANAM, V. <strong>AND</strong> DINAKARAN, D., 1998, Bio control agent for<br />

cashew borers. The Hindu, May 28, p.24.<br />

AMBETHGAR, V., 1996, Biological control of brown plant hopper Nilaparvata lugens with<br />

entomogenous fungi. Madras Agricultural Journal, 8: 203-204.<br />

ANONYMOUS, 1995, Cyanotech to sell B.t. mosquito agent. AGROW, 236: 18.<br />

BALARDIN, R.S. <strong>AND</strong> LOCH, L.C., 1989, Semi-synthetic cultures media for N. rileyi mass<br />

production. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 24: 375-381.<br />

B<strong>AND</strong>ARA, J.M.R.S. <strong>AND</strong> AMANGAMA, D., 1994, Metarhizium sp. A new biocontrol agent<br />

for brown planthopper management in rice fields. International Rice Research<br />

Newsletter, 19: 19.<br />

BARBOSA, J.V., DAEMON, E. <strong>AND</strong> BITTENCOURT, 1997, Partial purification and<br />

characterization of two extracellular N-acetyl-D glucosaminidases on larval<br />

moulting and nymphal survival of Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Journal of<br />

Invertebrate Pathology, 66: 264-282.<br />

BARDNER, W.A., OETTING, R.D. <strong>AND</strong> STOREY, C.K., 1984, Scheduling of Verticillium<br />

lecanii and benomyl application to maintain aphid control on Chrysanthemum in<br />

green houses. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77: 514-518.<br />

BARNES, S.E. <strong>AND</strong> MOORE, D., 1997, The effect of fatty acids on the germination of conidia<br />

of Metarhizium flavoviride. Mycology Research, 101: 662-666.<br />

BEIHARZ, V.C., PARBERY, D.G. <strong>AND</strong> SWART, H.J., 1982, Dodire a selective agent for<br />

certain soil fungi. Transaction Brazilian Mycological Society, 79: 507-511.<br />

BERRETTA, M.F., LEUCONA, R.E., Z<strong>AND</strong>OMENI, R.D. <strong>AND</strong> GRAV, D., 1998, Genotyping<br />

isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana by RAPD with<br />

fluorescent labels. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 71: 145-150.<br />

BIDOCHKA, M.J., McDONALD, M.A., ST LEGER, R.J. <strong>AND</strong> ROBERTS, D.W., 1994,<br />

Differentiation at species and strains of entomopathogenic fungi by Random<br />

Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Current Genetics, 25: 107-113.<br />

BROWN, I.F. <strong>AND</strong> SISLER, H.D., 1960, Mechanisms of fungitoxic action of n-dodecyl<br />

guanidine acetate. Phytopathology, 50: 830-839.<br />

BURGES, H.D., 1981, Progress in the microbial control of pests, in Microbial Control of Pests<br />

and Plant Diseases, 1970-1980. (Ed. H.D. Burges), Academic Press, London,<br />

pp.1-6.<br />

BURGES, H.D., 1998, Formulation of mycoinsecticides. In Formulation of Microbial<br />

Biopesticides (Ed. H. D. Burges). Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, pp.131-<br />

185.<br />

BUTT, T.M., IBRAHIM, L., BALL, B.V. <strong>AND</strong> CLARK, S.J., 1994, Pathogenicity of the<br />

entomogenous fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana against<br />

crucifer pests and the honeybee, Biocontrol Services and Technology, 4: 207-217.<br />

CAMPBELL, R.K., BARNES, G.L., CARTWRIGHT, B.O. <strong>AND</strong> EIKENBARY, R.D., 1983,<br />

Growth and sporulation of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in a<br />

basal medium containing various carbohydrate source. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 41: 117-121.<br />

CASTRILLO, L.A. <strong>AND</strong> BROOKS, W.M., 1998, Differentation of Beauveria bassiana isolates<br />

from the darkling beetle. Alphitobus diaperinus using isozyme and RAPD analysis.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 72: 190-196.<br />

CH<strong>AND</strong>LER, D., 1992, The potential of entomopathogenic fungi to control the lettuce root<br />

aphid Pemphigus burcarius. Phytoparasitica, 20: 115-155.


CHARNLEY, A.K. <strong>AND</strong> ST. LEGER, R.J., 1989, The role of cuticle degrading enzymes in<br />

fungal pathogenesis in insects, In: The Fungal Spore and Disease Initiation in<br />

Plants and Animals, eds. G.T. Cole and H.C. Kock, Plenum Press, New York,<br />

USA, pp.267-286.<br />

CHASE, A.R., OSBORNE, L.S. <strong>AND</strong> FERGUSON, V.M., 1986, Selective isolation of the<br />

entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizaum anisopliae from an<br />

artificial potting medium. Florida Entomology, 69: 285-292.<br />

CLARKSON, J. M., 1992, Molecular approaches to the study of entompathogenic fungi. In<br />

Biological Control of Locusts and Gross Hoppers (Eds. C. J. Lomer and C. Prior,<br />

Eds.). CAB International, Wallington, UK, pp.191-199.<br />

COUCH, T.L. <strong>AND</strong> IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., 1981, Formulation of insect pathogens in Microbial<br />

Control of Pests and Plant Diseases, 1970-1980, Ed. H. D. Burges, Academic<br />

Press, London, pp.621-634.<br />

CR<strong>AND</strong>ALL, M. <strong>AND</strong> LAWRENCE, L.J., 1980, Sporulation in Hansenula wingei, is induced by<br />

nitrogen starvation in Maltose-containing media. Journal of Bacteriology, 142: 276-<br />

284.<br />

DETCH, T., 1948, Occurrence of Ceratocystis fimbriata Ell and Holst., Transaction Brazilian<br />

Mycological Society. 31: 286-304.<br />

DICE, C.R., 1945, Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology,<br />

26: 293-302.<br />

DILLON, R.J. <strong>AND</strong> CHARNLEY, A.K., 1990, Initiation of germination in conidia of the<br />

entomopathogenic fungus. Metarhizium anisoplias. Mycological Research, 94:<br />

299-304.<br />

DOBERSKI, J.W. <strong>AND</strong> TRIBS, H.T., 1980, Isolation of entomogenous fungi, from elm bark<br />

and soil with reference to ecology of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae. Transaction Brazilian Mycological Society, 74: 95-100.<br />

DRUMMOND, J., HEALE, J.B. <strong>AND</strong> GILLESPIE, A.J., 1987, Germination and effect of<br />

reduced humidity on expression of pathogenicity in Verticillium lecanii against the<br />

glasshouse whitefly Trialerodes verporariorum. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,<br />

16: 221-228.<br />

EDELSTEIN, J.D., LECUONA, R.E. <strong>AND</strong> TRUMPER, E.V., 2004, Selection of culture media<br />

and in vitro assessment of temperature dependent development of Nomuraea<br />

rileyi. Biological Control, 33: 1-11.<br />

EL-SAYED, G.N., IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., LEATHERS, T.B., <strong>AND</strong> SAYED, G.N.EL., 1992, A semidefined<br />

medium for culturing Nomurea rileyi. Mycopathologia, 118: 163-165.<br />

FARGUES, J., 1975, Etude experimental dans la nature e Beauveria and Metarhizium a dose<br />

reduite contre Lephinotarsa decemlineata. Annals of Zoology, Ecology and<br />

Animals, 7: 247-264.<br />

FARGUES, J., REISINGER, O., ROBERT, P.H. <strong>AND</strong> AUBART, C., 1983, Biodegradation of<br />

entomoatphogens hyphomycetes. Influence of clay coating on Beauveria bassiana<br />

blastospore survival in soil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 41: 131-142.<br />

FARGUES, T. <strong>AND</strong> LUZ, 2000, Effects of fluctuating moisture and temperature regimes on<br />

the infection potential of Beauveria bassiana for Rhodnius prolixus. Journal of<br />

Invertebrate Pathology, 75: 202-211.<br />

FEGAN, M., MANNERS, J.M. <strong>AND</strong> MACLEAN, D.J., 1992, Random amplified polymoprhic<br />

DNA markers reveal a high degree of genetic diversity in the entomopathogenic<br />

fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. Journal of General Microbiology,<br />

139: 2075-2081.<br />

FEGAN, M., MAUNERS, J.M. <strong>AND</strong> MACLEAN, D.J., IRWIN, J.A.G., SAMUELY, K.P.S.,<br />

HOLDOM, D.E. <strong>AND</strong> LI, D.R., 1993, Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers<br />

reveal a high degree of genetic diversity in the entomopathogenic fungus<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. Journal General Microbiology, 139: 2075-<br />

2081.<br />

FERRON, P., 1978, Biological control of insect pests by entomogenous fungi. Annual Review<br />

of Entomology, 23: 409-442.<br />

FERRON, P., ROBERTS, P.H. <strong>AND</strong> DEOTTE, A., 1975, Susceptibility of Oryctes rhinoceros<br />

adults to Metarhizium anisopliae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 25: 313-319.<br />

FOGAL, W.H., MITTAL, R.K. <strong>AND</strong> THURSTON, G.S., 1986, production and quality evaluation<br />

of Beauvera bassiana for control of white spruces cone and seed in sects.<br />

Information Report, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Ontario, Canada, p.15.


FURGUES, J.M., ROUGIER, B., GOAJET, ITIER, B., 1988, Effect of the rayonnement solaire<br />

sar ta persistence des conidiosproes de. 1 Lyphomycete entomopathogens,<br />

Nomuraea rileyi a. la. Surface du couvert vegetal. Entomophaga, 33: 357-370.<br />

GAMS, W., 1971, Molds and other fungi in indoor environments. Cephalosporium artige<br />

schimmelpilze (Hophomycetes), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttagart, 7: 161-169.<br />

GARDNER, W.A., KINARD, D.J. <strong>AND</strong> VITARANA, C.D., 1998, In vitro germination and<br />

growth response of two entomogenous fungi to imadacloprid. Journal of<br />

Entomological Science, 33: 322-324.<br />

GARDNER, W.A., OETTING, R.D. <strong>AND</strong> STOREY, G.K., 1984, Scheduling of Verticillium<br />

lecanii and benoyl application of maintain aphid (Homoptera : Aphididae) control<br />

on chrysanthemums in green houses. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77: 514-<br />

518.<br />

GETZIN, L.W., 1961, Spicaria rileyi an entomogenous fungus of Trichoplusiani. Journal of<br />

Insect Pathology, 3: 2-10.<br />

GILLESPIE, A.T. <strong>AND</strong> CLAYDON, N., 1989, The use of entomogenous fungi for pest control<br />

and the role of toxins in pathogenesis. Pesticidal Science, 27: 203-215.<br />

GILLESPIE, A.T. <strong>AND</strong> CRAWFORD, E., 1986, Effect of water activity on conidial germination<br />

and mycelial growth of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Paccilomyces<br />

sp. and Verticillium lecanii, In: “Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology” (R.A. Samson, J.M. VIak, and D. Peters, Eds.). Fourth Int. Colloq. of<br />

Invertebrate Pathology, Wageningen, August 1986, p.254.<br />

GILREATH, M.E., McCUTCHEON, G.S., CARNER, G.R. <strong>AND</strong> TURNIPSEED, S.G., 1986,<br />

Pathogen incidence in noctuid larvae from selected soybean genotypes. Journal<br />

of Agricultural Entomology, 3: 213-226.<br />

GOMEZ, K.A. <strong>AND</strong> GOMEZ, A.A., 1984, Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2 nd<br />

Edition, John Wiley, New York, p.639.<br />

GOPALKRISHNAN, C. <strong>AND</strong> MOHAN, S., 2000, Effect of certain insecticides and fungicides<br />

on the conidial germination of Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson. Entomon, 25:<br />

217-223.<br />

GOPALKRISHNAN, C. <strong>AND</strong> NARAYANAN, K., 1988, Occurrence of two entomofungal<br />

pathogens, Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschinkoff) Sorokin var. minor Tulloch and<br />

Nomuraea rileyi on Heliothis armigera. Current Science, 57: 867-868.<br />

HAJEK, A.E. <strong>AND</strong> LEDGER, R.J., 1994, Interaction between fungal pathogens and insect<br />

hosts. Annual Review of Entomology, 39: 293-322.<br />

HALL, R.A., 1982, Deuteromycetes : Virulence and bioassay design, In: Invertebrate<br />

Pathology and Microbial Control, Proceedings III International Colloquium<br />

Invertebrate Pathology, XV Annual Medium Soc. of Invertebrate Pathology,<br />

Brighton, U.K. pp.191-196.<br />

HAYLER, N., 1993, Verdicillium lecanis for control of aphids and thrips on cucumber. Bulletin<br />

OILB/SROP, 16: 63-66.<br />

HINCAPIE, R.H., OSPINA, A., BUSTILLO, Y. <strong>AND</strong> SALDARRIAGA, A., 1990, Evaluacion del<br />

entomopatogeno Verticillium lecanii en el control del afido Mysus persicae en<br />

crisantemos. Revista Colombiana de Entomologia, 16(2): 21-27.<br />

HOLDOM, D.G., KLASHORST-G-VAN-DE, VAN-DE-KLASHORST-G, <strong>AND</strong> DE-<br />

KLASHORST-G-VAN, 1986, In expensive culture media and methods for<br />

Nomuraea rileyi. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 48: 246-248.<br />

HUGAR, P.S. <strong>AND</strong> HEGDE, M., 1996, Occurrence of Nomurea rileyi on Helicoverpa armigera<br />

infesting sorghum. Insect Environment, 2: 44-45.<br />

HYWEL-JONES, N.L. <strong>AND</strong> GILLESPIE, 1990, Effect of temperature on spore germination in<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana. Mycological Research, 94: 389-<br />

392.<br />

IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., 1981, The fungus Nomuraea rileyi as a microbial insecticide. In: Microbial<br />

Control of Pests and Plant Diseases 1970-80. Eds. Burgus, H., Ed., Academic<br />

Press, New York, pp.513-536.<br />

IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., GARCIA, C. <strong>AND</strong> HOSTETTER, D.L., 1976, Effect of temperature on<br />

growth and sporulation of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi.<br />

Environmental Entomology, 5: 935-936.<br />

IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., HOSTETTER, D.L., GARCIA, C. <strong>AND</strong> PINNELL, R.E., 1975, Sensitiivty of<br />

the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi to chemical pesticides used on<br />

soybean. Environmental Entomology, 4: 765-768.


IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., MARSTON, N.L., HOSTELLER, D.L., PUTTLER, B. <strong>AND</strong> BELL, J.V., 1976,<br />

Natural and induced epizootics of Naumuraca rileyi in soybean caterpillars.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 27: 191-198.<br />

IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M., PUTTLER, B., MARSTON, N.L., HOSTETTER, D.L. <strong>AND</strong> DICKERSON,<br />

W.A., 1975, Seasonal incidence of the entomopathogenic fungus, Spicaria rileyi<br />

associated with noctuid pests of soybeans. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 25:<br />

135.<br />

IM, D.J., LEE, M.H., AGUDA, R.M. <strong>AND</strong> ROMBACH, M.C., 1988, Effect of nutrients on pH on<br />

the growth and sporulation of four entomogenous hypomycetes fungi<br />

(Deuteromycotina). Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 27: 41-46.<br />

INGLIS, D., GOETTEL, M.S., BUTT, T.M. <strong>AND</strong> STRASSER, H., 2001, Use of hyphomycetous<br />

fungi for managing insect pests. In Fungi as Biocontrol Agents (Eds. T. M. Butt, C.<br />

W. Jackson and N. Magan. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp.23-70.<br />

INGLIS, G.D., GOETTEL, M.S. <strong>AND</strong> JOHNSON, D.L., 1993, Persistence of the<br />

entomopathogenic fungis, Beauveria bassiana, on phylloplanes of crested<br />

wheatgrass and alfalfa. Biological Control, 5: 581-590.<br />

JAMES, R.R., 2001, Effects of exogenous nutrients on conidial germination and virulence<br />

against the silver leaf whitefly for two hyphomycets. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 77: 99-107.<br />

JAYARAJ, S., 1989, Integrated management of coffee green scale. Coccus viridis (Green)<br />

(Homoptera: Coccidae). Journal of Plantation Crops, 16: 195-201.<br />

JENKINS, N.E. <strong>AND</strong> THOMAS, M.B., 1996, Effect of formulation and application method on<br />

the efficacy of aerial and submerged conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride for locust<br />

and grasshopper control. Pesticides Science, 46: 299-306.<br />

JOSHI, S.P., RANJEKAR, P.K. <strong>AND</strong> GUPTA, V.S., 1999, Molecular markers in plant genome<br />

analysis. Current Science, 77: 230-240.<br />

KAAYA, G.P., KOKWARO, E.D. <strong>AND</strong> MURITHI, J., 1991, Mortalities in adult Glossina<br />

morsitans experimentally infected with the entomogenous fungi, Beauveria<br />

bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Discovery Innovation, 3: 55-60.<br />

KANAGARATNAM, P., HALL, R.A. <strong>AND</strong> URGES, H.D., 1982, Control of glasshouse whitefly,<br />

Trialeurodes vaporariorum, by an aphid strain of the fungus Verticillium lecanii.<br />

Annual Application Biology, 100: 213-219.<br />

KHALIL, S.K., KAHN, M., FARMANULLAH <strong>AND</strong> NAEEM, M., 1990, Studies on<br />

entomopathogenic fungi Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) for the control of green pearl<br />

aphid, Myzus persicae Sulz. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 6: 597-600.<br />

KHALIL, S.K., TABORSKY, V. <strong>AND</strong> BARTOS, J., 1983, Studies on Verticillium lecanii for the<br />

biological control of aphids. In 10 th International Congress of Plant Protection at<br />

Brighton, England, 2: 20-25.<br />

KISH, L.P., SAMSON, R.A. <strong>AND</strong> ALLEN, G.E., 1974, The genus Nomuraea Maublanc.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 24: 154-158.<br />

KLEESPIES, R.G. <strong>AND</strong> ZIMMERMANN, G., 1992, Production of blastospores by three<br />

strains of Metarhizium anisopliae in submerged culture. Biocontrol Science and<br />

Technology, 2: 127-135.<br />

KULKARNI, N.S., 1999, Utilization of fungal pathogen Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson on<br />

the management of Lepidopterous pests. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural<br />

Sciences, Dharwad.<br />

L<strong>AND</strong>A, Z., 1984, Protection against glasshouse whitefly, Trialeurodicus vaporariorum in<br />

integrated protection programmes for glasshouse chambers. Sbornik Urtiz<br />

Zahoraduichini, 11: 215-218.<br />

LEAL, C.M., BERTIOLI, D.J., BUTT, T.M. <strong>AND</strong> BPEBEDY, J.F., 1994, Characterization of<br />

isolates of the entompathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae by RAPD-PCR.<br />

Mycological Research, 98: 1077-1081.<br />

LEATHERS, T.D. GUPTA, S.C. <strong>AND</strong> ALEX<strong>AND</strong>ER, N.J., 1993, Mycopesticietu: status,<br />

challenges and potential. Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 12: 69-75.<br />

LI, D.P. <strong>AND</strong> HOLDOM, D.G., 1994, effects of pesticides on growth and sporulation of<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycotina : Hyphomycetes). Journal of<br />

Invertebrate Pathology, 63: 209-211.<br />

LINGG, A.J. <strong>AND</strong> DONALDSON, M.P., 1981, Biotic and abiotic factors affecting statutory of<br />

Beauveria bassiana conidia in soil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 38(2): 191-<br />

200.


LIU, Y.Z., MILNER, R.J., MCRAE, C.F. <strong>AND</strong> LUTTON, G.G., 1993, The use of dodire in<br />

selective media for isolation of Metarhizium spp. from soil. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Entomology, 62: 248-251.<br />

LOPEZ, C.V., FERN<strong>AND</strong>EZ, I. <strong>AND</strong> FERR<strong>AND</strong>IS, B., 1995, Effect of heavy metals on growth<br />

isolation and proteolytic activity of the nematophagous fungus Verticillium<br />

suchlasporium. African Entomology, 13: 93-96.<br />

LORIA, R., GALAINI, S. <strong>AND</strong> ROBERTS, D.W., 1983, Survival of inoculum of the<br />

entompathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana as influence by fungicides.<br />

Environmental Entomology, 12: 1724-1726.<br />

MADDOX, J.V., 1994, Insect pathogens as biological control agents. In Introduction to Insect<br />

Pest Management (Eds. Metcalf, R.L., Luckmann, W.H.). John Wiley and Sons<br />

Inc., Publication, New York, pp.199-244.<br />

MARGARET, S., BRUCE, L.P., DALE, R.B., 1991, Verticillium lecanii, isolated from larvae of<br />

pear Thrips, Taediothrips inconsequens, in Vermont. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 58: 157-163.<br />

MASUDA, T. <strong>AND</strong> KIKUCHI, O., 1992, Pathogenicity of Verticillium lecanii isolates to whitefly<br />

and aphids. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 36: 239-245.<br />

MAURER, P., COUTEAUDIER, Y., GIRARD, P.A. <strong>AND</strong> RIBA, G., 1997, Genetic diversity of<br />

Beauveria bassiana and relatedness to hose insect range. Mycological Research,<br />

101: 139-164.<br />

McCAMMON, S.A. <strong>AND</strong> RATH, A.C., 1994, Separation of Metarhizium anisopliae strains by<br />

temperature dependent germination rates. Mycological Research, 98: 1253-1257.<br />

McCOY, C.W., SAMSON, R.A. <strong>AND</strong> BOUCIAS, D.G., 1988, Entomogenous fungi, In:<br />

Handbook of Natural Pesticides, Vol.5, Microbial Insecticides, Part A,<br />

Entomogenous Protozoa and Fungi, ed., C.M. Iqnoffo, CRC, Press, BocaRAton,<br />

Florida, USA, pp.151-236.<br />

McCOY, E.E. <strong>AND</strong> CARVER, C.W., 1941, A method for obtaining spores of the fungus<br />

Beauveria bassiava (Bals.) vill. In quantity, J.N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 49: 205.<br />

MEADE, D.L. <strong>AND</strong> BRUCE, D.N., 1991, The use of Verticillium lecanii against submarginal<br />

instars of Bemisia tabaci. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 57: 296-298.<br />

MILLER, R.W. <strong>AND</strong> BARRAN, L.R., 1977, The effect of ionic surface-active agents on<br />

macronodial plasma membrane of Fusarium sulphureum. Canadian Journal of<br />

Microbiology, 23: 1373-1383.<br />

MILNER, R., WRIGHT, T., WELTON, M., BUDAU, C., TYRRELL, B., 1992, Identification and<br />

partial purification of a cell lytic factor from entomophasa. Annual Meeting of<br />

Society for Invertebrate Pathology, 254: 230-260.<br />

MILNER, R.J. <strong>AND</strong> LUTTON, G.G., 1986, Dependence of Verticillium lecanii on high<br />

humidifies for infection and sporulation using Myzus persicae as host.<br />

Environmental Entomology, 15: 380-382.<br />

MILNER, R.J., 1992, Selection and characterization of staring of Metarhizium anisophiae for<br />

control of soil insects in Australia. In: Biological Control of Locasts and<br />

Grasshoppers (C.J. Lomer and C. Prior, Eds.), CAB International, London,<br />

pp.200-207<br />

MILNER, R.J., SAMSON, P.R. <strong>AND</strong> BULLARD, G.K., 2002, FI-1045 : A profile of a<br />

commercially useful isolate of Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. Biocontrol<br />

Science and Technology, 12: 43-58.<br />

MIRANPURI, G.S. <strong>AND</strong> KHACHATOURIANS, G.G., 1995, Application of Beauveria bassiana<br />

and Verticillium lecanii against Saskatoon berry leaf aphid Acyrthosiphon<br />

macrosiphum. Journal of Insect Science, 8: 93-95.<br />

MOORE, D., DOURO-KPINDOU, O.K., JENKINS, N.E. <strong>AND</strong> LOMER, C.J., 1996, Effect of<br />

moisture content and temperature on storage of Metarhizium flavoviridae conidia.<br />

Biocontrol Science and Technology, 6: 51-61.<br />

MOORE, D., HIGGINS, P.M. <strong>AND</strong> LOMER, C.J., 1996, The effects of simulated and nautral<br />

sunlight on the viability of conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride Gams and Rozsypal<br />

and interactions with termperature. Biocontrol Science Technology, 7: 87-94.<br />

MORLEY, D.J, MOORE, D., PRIOR, C., 1995, Screening of Metarhizium and Beauveria spp.<br />

conidia with exposure to simulated sunlight and a range of temperatures.<br />

Mycological Research, 100: 31–38.


MULLER, E.J., 2000, Control of the brown locust, Locustana pardalina (Walker) using a<br />

mycoinsecticide addressing the issues of speed of kill, dose rate mortality and<br />

reduction in feeding. African Entomology, 8: 217-221.<br />

NADEAU, M.P. <strong>AND</strong> BOISVERT, J.L., 1994, Larvicidal activity of the entomopathogenic<br />

fungus Tolypocladium cylindrosporum (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) on the<br />

mosquito Aedes triseriatus and the black fly Simulium vittatum (Diptera:<br />

Simuliidae). Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 10: 487–491.<br />

NADEAU, M.P., DUNPHY, G.B. <strong>AND</strong> BOISVERT, J.L., 1996, Development of Erynia conica<br />

(Zygomycetes : Entomophthorales) on the cuticle of the adult black flies Simulium<br />

rostratum and Simulium decorum (Diptera : Simuliidae). Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 68: 50-58.<br />

NEI, M. <strong>AND</strong> LI, W.H., 1979, Mathematical model for studying genetic variation interms of<br />

restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of National Academic Science, USA, 70:<br />

5269-5273.<br />

NENI, Y.L. <strong>AND</strong> THAPLIYAL, P.N., 1997, Fungicides in Plant Disease Control. Oxford and<br />

IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, p.531.<br />

NEWTON, B.A., 1956, The properties and mode of action of the polymyxins. Bacteriological<br />

Review, 20: 14-27.<br />

NIER, T. RIVER, F. <strong>AND</strong> BERMUDEZ, J.C., 1993, First report for Mexico on the isolation of<br />

Verticillium lecanii from whitefly and in vitro pathogenicity tests on this insect.<br />

Revista Mexicana De Micologia. 7: 149-156.<br />

PARIS, J. <strong>AND</strong> FERRON, G., 1971, Virulence of some B. brongniartii mutants. Annual<br />

Review of Entomology, 16: 74-77.<br />

PATEL, K.C. <strong>AND</strong> YADAV, D.N., 1990, Laboratory mass production studies with Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae. Annals of biology (Ludhiana), 6: 135-140.<br />

PATIL, R.K., 2000, Ecofriendly approaches for the management of Spodoptera litura (F.) in<br />

groundnut. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.<br />

PEKRUL, S. <strong>AND</strong> GRULA, E.A., 1979, Mode of infection of the corn earworm (Heliothis zea)<br />

by Beauveria bassiana as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of<br />

Invertebrates Pathology, 34: 228-247.<br />

PHADKE, C.H., RAO, V.G. <strong>AND</strong> PAWAR, S.K., 1978, Natural outbreak of the mycordine<br />

fungus, Nomurea rileyi (Farlow) Samson on leaf cating caterpillar, Sopdoptera<br />

litura Fab. in Maharashtra. Current Science, 47: 476-478.<br />

PREEZ, J.C., DU, JONG, F. DE., BOTES, P.J. <strong>AND</strong> LATEGON, T.M., 1985, Fermentation<br />

alcohol from grain sorghum starch. Biomass, 8: 101-117.<br />

PRIOR, C., JOLL<strong>AND</strong>S, P. <strong>AND</strong> PATOUREL, G., 1988, Infectivity of oil and water<br />

formulations of Beauveria bassiana to the cocoa weevil pest Pantorhytes plutus.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 52: 66-72.<br />

PRISTAVKO, W.P. <strong>AND</strong> GORAL, V.M., 1967, The mass production of Meauveria bassiana,<br />

In: Insect Pathology and Microbial Control, ed. P.A. Van dev. Lann. North, Holland<br />

Publishing Co. Amsterdam, pp.118-119.<br />

PUTTLER, B., IGN<strong>OF</strong>FO, C.M. <strong>AND</strong> HOSTETTER, D.L., 1976, Relative susceptibility of nine<br />

caterpiller species to the fungus Nomuraea rileyi. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 27: 269-270.<br />

PUZARI, K.C., SARMAH, D.K. <strong>AND</strong> HAZARIKA, L.K., 1997, Medium for mass production of<br />

Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin. Journal of Biological Control, 11: 97-<br />

110.<br />

QUINDEN, R.J., 1984, The use of Verticillium lecanii an entomopathogenic fungus to control<br />

of glasshouse whitefly. In Proceedings of a Conference at Brighton, England, 22-<br />

25: 9-12.<br />

QUINTELA, E.D. <strong>AND</strong> McCOY, C.W., 1997, Pathogenicity enhancement of Metarhizium<br />

anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana instars of Diaprepes abbreviatus<br />

(Coleoptera:Curculionidae) with sublethal doses of imidacloprid. Environmental<br />

Entomology, 26: 11173-1182.<br />

RAMOSKA, W.A., 1982, An examination of the long term epizootic potential of various<br />

artificially introduced mosquito larval pathogens. Mosquito News, 42: 603-607.<br />

RAMOSKA, W.A., 1984, The influence of relative humidity on Beauvuria bassiana infectivity<br />

and replication in the Chich bug, Blissus leucopterus. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 43: 389-394.


RAO, V.G. <strong>AND</strong> PHADKE, C.H., 1977, A mustarding disease of tobacco leaf eating<br />

caterpillar. Current Science, 46: 648-649.<br />

RATH, A.C., 1992, Metarhizium anisopliae for control of the Tasmanian pasture scarab<br />

Adoryphorus lcouloni In “Use of pathogens in scarab Pest Management” (T.A.<br />

Jackson and T.R. Glove, Eds.), Intercept, Andover, pp.217-228.<br />

RATH, A.C., CARR, C.J., GRAHAM, B.R., 1995, Characterization of Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

strains by carbohydrate utilization (AP150CH). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,<br />

65: 152–161.<br />

RATH, A.C., WORLEDGE, D., KOEN, T.B. <strong>AND</strong> ROWE, B.A., 1995, Long term field efficacy<br />

of the entomogenous fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae against the subterranean<br />

scarab, Adoryphorus couloni. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 5: 439-451.<br />

RAVENSBERG, W.J., MALAIS, M. <strong>AND</strong> SCHAAF, D.A., 1990, Application of Verticillium<br />

lecanii in tomatoes and cucumbers to control whitefly and thrips. Environmental<br />

Entomology, 6: 98-113.<br />

RAVENSBERG, W.J., MALAIS, M., V<strong>AND</strong>ER <strong>AND</strong> SCHOAF, D.A., 1990, Verticillium lecanii<br />

as a microbial insecticide against glasshouse whitefly, in Proceedings of the<br />

Brighton Crop Protection Conference Pests and Diseases, Vol. 3. British Crop<br />

Protection Council, Farnham, 3: 265-268.<br />

RIBA, G. <strong>AND</strong> GL<strong>AND</strong>E, A., 1980, Development of a nutritive medium for deep culture of the<br />

entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi. Entomophaga, 25: 317-322.<br />

ROBERTS, D.W. <strong>AND</strong> CAMPBELL, 1977, Stability of entomopathogenic fungi. Journal of<br />

Invertebrate Pathology, 6: 112-116.<br />

ROBERTSON, L.N., DALL, D.J., LAI-FOOK, J. <strong>AND</strong> WALKER, P.W., 1996, Disease and<br />

micro-organism incidence of Greyback cane grub in Australian sugarcane. In Use<br />

of Ptahogens in Scarab Pest Management, Eds. Granados, R.R. and Jackson,<br />

T.A., Intercept, Andover, pp.209-215.<br />

ROVIRA, A.D. <strong>AND</strong> WILDERMUTH, G.B., 1981, The nature and mechanisms of suppression<br />

pages 385 415 in biology and control of take all, Eds. M.J.C. Asher and P. J.<br />

Shipton, Pathogenicity enhancement of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria<br />

bassiana to first instars of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Col : Curelionidae) with<br />

sublethal doses of imidocloprid. Enviornmental Entomology, 26: 1173-1182.<br />

SAMSINAKOVA, A., KALALOVA, S. VLCEK, V. <strong>AND</strong> KYBAL, J., 1981, Mass production of<br />

Beaureria bassiana for regulation of Leptinotarsa decemlineata populations.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 38: 169-174.<br />

SAMSON, R.A., EVANS, H.C. <strong>AND</strong> LATGE, J.P., 1988, Atlas of Entomopathigenic fungi,<br />

Spingerverlag, Publication, Berlin, New York, p.182.<br />

SILVA, L. <strong>AND</strong> LOCH, L.C., 1987, Sporulation of the entomopathogenie fungus Nomuraea<br />

rileyi on polished rice grain media. Anais da sociedode entomologica da Brasil, 16:<br />

213-222.<br />

SILVA, L., SILVA, R.F.P. <strong>AND</strong> HEINECK, M.A., 1993, In vitro evaluation of the effect of<br />

different insecticides on the sporulation of the fungus Nomuraea rileyi. Anais da<br />

Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 22: 99-103.<br />

SILVA, M.T.B. <strong>AND</strong> SILVA, M.T.B., 1993, Control of the soybean caterpillar, Anticarsia<br />

gemmatalis (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae). Ciencial Rural, 23: 127-132.<br />

SILVEIRA, E.B., AL-JANABI, S.M., MAGALHAES, B.P., CARVALHO, L.J.C.B. <strong>AND</strong> TIGANO,<br />

M.S., 1998, Polymorphism of the grasshopper Schistocerca pallens (Thunberg)<br />

and its natural pathogen Metarhizium flavoviride Gams and Rozsypal<br />

(Hymomycetes), revealed by RAPD analysis. Anais da Socieddade Entomologica<br />

do Brasil, 27: 91-99.<br />

SMITH, R.J. <strong>AND</strong> GRULA, 1981, Nutritional requirements for conidial germination and hyphal<br />

growth of Beauveria bassiana. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 37: 222-230.<br />

SMITH, R.J. <strong>AND</strong> GRULA, E.A., 1983, Chitinase is an enzyme in Beauveria bassian<br />

(Ehtomophagus fungus). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 42: 319-326.<br />

SOARES, G.G. MARCHAL, M. <strong>AND</strong> FERRON, P., 1983, Susceptibility of Otiorhynctus<br />

suleatus larvae to Metarhizium anisopliae and two different temperature.<br />

Environmental Entomology, 12: 1887-1891.<br />

SOPER, R.S., HOLBROOK, F.R. <strong>AND</strong> GORDON, C.C., 1974, Comparative pesticide effects<br />

on Entomophthora and the phytopathogen Alternaria solani. Environmental<br />

Entomology, 3: 560-562.


ST LEGER, R.J., BUTT, T.M., STAPLES, R.C. <strong>AND</strong> ROBERTS, D.W., 1989, Synthesis of<br />

proteins including a cuticle degrading protease during differentiation of the<br />

entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Experimental Mycology, 13:<br />

253-262.<br />

ST LEGER, R.J., CHARMLEY, A.K. <strong>AND</strong> COOPER, R.M., 1988, Production of polyphenol<br />

pigments and phenoloxidase by the entomopathogen, Metarhizium anisopliae.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 53: 211-215.<br />

ST LEGER, R.J., DURR<strong>AND</strong>S, P.K., CHARNLEY, A.K <strong>AND</strong> COOPER, R.M., 1998, Role of<br />

extracellular chymoelastase in the virulence of Metarhizium anisopliae for<br />

Manduca Sexta. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 52: 285-293.<br />

ST LEGER, R.J., FRANK, D.C., ROBERTS, D.W. <strong>AND</strong> STAPLES, R.C., 1992, Molecular<br />

cloning and regulatory analysis of the cuticle-degrading protease structural gene<br />

from the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. European Journal of<br />

Biochemical, 204: 991-1001.<br />

STANSLY, P.A., JACINTO, G. <strong>AND</strong> ORELLANA, M., 1990, Field manipulation of Nomuraea<br />

rileyi (Moniliales: Moniliaceae) effects on soybean defoliator in coastal Ecuador.<br />

Journal of Economic Entomology, 83: 2193-2195.<br />

STATHERS, T.E., MOORE, D. <strong>AND</strong> PRIOR, C., 1993, The effect of different temperatures on<br />

the stability of Metarhizium flavoviride conidia stored in vegetable and mineral oils.<br />

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 62: 111-115.<br />

STUDDERT, J.P., KAYA, H.K. <strong>AND</strong> DUNIWAY, J.W., 1990, Effect of water potential,<br />

temperature and clay coating on survival of Beauveria bassiana conidia in a loam<br />

and peat soil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 55: 417-427.<br />

SUKLOVA, T.I., 1989, The biological method in the greenhouse. Rashichita Rastenii, 2: 37-<br />

38.<br />

SUNDARA BABU, P.C. <strong>AND</strong> JAYARAJ, S., 1985, Entomopathogenic fungi and their<br />

utilization in pest suppression. Entomopathogenic fungi, 135-156.<br />

SUNDARABABU, P.C., 1985, Metarhizium and Beauveria infection in insects. In: Microbial<br />

Control and Pest Management (S. Jayaraj, Ed.), Tamil Nadu Agricultural<br />

University, Coimbatore, pp.130-132.<br />

SUTTON, R.M., GARDNER, W.A. <strong>AND</strong> NOBLET, R., 1981, Effects of casein, trehalose, and<br />

ascorbic acid on in vitro growth of Nomuraea rileyi. Journal of the Georgia<br />

Entomological Society, 16: 420-423.<br />

TANG, L. <strong>AND</strong> HOU, R.F., 1998, Potential application of entomopathogenic fungus,<br />

Nomuraea rileyi for control of corn earworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Entomologia<br />

Experimentalis et Applicata, 88: 25-30.<br />

TEDDERS, W.L., WEAVER, D.J., WEHUNT, E.J. <strong>AND</strong> GENTRY, C.R., 1982, Bioassay of<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae against larvae of the plum curculio, Conotrachelus<br />

nenuphar (Herbst) (Curculionidae : Coleoptera). Environmental Entomology, 11:<br />

901-904.<br />

TEDDEUR, W.L., 1981, In vitro inhibition of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana<br />

and Metarhizium anisopliae by six fungicides used in pecan cultures.<br />

Environmental Entomology, 10: 346-349.<br />

THOMAS, M.B., CBONGBOUI, C. <strong>AND</strong> LOMER, C.J., 1996, Between season survival of the<br />

grasshopper pathogen Metarhizium flavoviride in the Sahel. Biocontrol Science<br />

Technology, 6: 569-573.<br />

THOMAS, M.B., WOOD, S.N. <strong>AND</strong> LOMER, C.J., 1997, Persistence of Metarhizium<br />

flavoviride and consequences for biological control of grasshopper and locusts.<br />

Pesticide Science, 49: 47-55.<br />

TIGANO, M.S., FARIA, M.R., LECUONA, R.E., SARTORI, M.R., DIAZ, B.M. <strong>AND</strong> DE-FARIA,<br />

M.R., 1995, Analysis of pathogenicity and germination of the fungus Nomuraea<br />

rileyi isolated in federal district. Anais da Sociedade Entomatologica do Brasil, 24:<br />

53-60.<br />

TIMONIN, M.J., FOGAL, W.H. <strong>AND</strong> LOPUSHANSKI, S.M., 1980, Possibility of using white<br />

and green, muscardine fungi for control of cone and seed insect pests. Can.<br />

Entomol., 112: 849-854.<br />

TULLOCH, M., 1976, The genus Meterhizium, Trans British Mycological Society, 66: 407-411.<br />

URTZ, B.E. <strong>AND</strong> RICE, W.C., 1997, RAPD-PCR characterization of Beauveria bassiana<br />

isolates from the rice water weevil Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus. Letters in Applied<br />

Microbiology, 25: 405-409.


VEEN, K.H. <strong>AND</strong> FERON, P., 1966, A selective medium for the isolation of Baeuveria<br />

bassiana and Metarhizium amiopliae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 8: 268-<br />

269.<br />

VEEN, K.H., 1968, Recherches sur la maladie, due a Metharhizium anisopliae chez le criquet<br />

Pèlerin. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Landbouwhogeschool<br />

Wageningen.<br />

VESTERGAARD, S., GILLESPIE, A.T., BUTT, T.M., SCHREITER, G. <strong>AND</strong> EILENBERG, J.,<br />

1995, Pathogenicity of the hyphomycetes fungi, Verticillium lecanii and<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae to the western flower thrips, Franklinella occidentalis.<br />

Biocontrol Science and Technology, 5: 152-156.<br />

VIMALA DEVI, P.S. <strong>AND</strong> PRASAD, Y.G., 1996, Compatibility of oils and antifeedants of plant<br />

origin with the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 68: 91-93.<br />

VIMALA DEVI, P.S., 1994, Conidia production of the entomopathogenic fungus N. rileyi and<br />

its evaluation for control of S. litura on Ricinus communis. Journal of Invertebrate<br />

Pathology, 63: 145-150.<br />

VIMALADEVI, P.S., 1995, Soil treatment with Nomuraea rileyi a promising technique for the<br />

control of Spodoptera litura on groundnut. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 5:<br />

361-364.<br />

WILDING, N., 1981, Pest control by entomophthoralu. In Microbial control of Pest and Plant<br />

Diseases (Eds. Burges, H.O.), Academic Press, London, pp.539-554.<br />

WILLIAMS, J.G., KUKBELIK, A.R., RAFALSKI, J.A. <strong>AND</strong> TINGEY, S.V., 1991, Genetic<br />

analysis with RAPD markers. In: More Gene Manipulations in Fungi (Eds. J. W.<br />

Bennett and L.L. Lasure), Academic Press, New York, 19: 431-439.<br />

WOODS, S.P. <strong>AND</strong> GRULA, E.A., 1984, Utilizable surface nutrients on Heliothis zea<br />

available for growth of Beauveria bassiana. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 43:<br />

259-269.<br />

YIP, H.Y., RATH, A.C. <strong>AND</strong> KOEN, T.B., 1992, Characterization of Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

isolates from Tasmanian pasture soils and their pathogenic to red headed<br />

cockchafer. Mycological Research, 96: 92-96.<br />

ZIMMERMANN, G., 1982, Effect of high temperatures and artificial sunlight on the viability of<br />

conidia of Metarhizium anisopliae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 40: 36-40.<br />

ZIMMERMANN, G., 1993, The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae and its<br />

potential as a biocontrol agent. Pesticide Science, 37: 375–379.


APPENDIX I<br />

Mean monthly weather data at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad<br />

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual<br />

1999<br />

Maximum (°C) 29.4 32.8 36.2 36.6 32.2 28.0 26.4 27.1 28.3 28.9 29.6 28.9 30.4<br />

Minimum (°C) 12.4 16.9 20.2 21.1 21.3 21.0 20.8 20.4 20.0 19.8 16.0 13.4 18.6<br />

RH (%) 75 63 63 65 75 85 89 85 83 79 59 51 73<br />

RF (mm) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 32.8 71.8 113.9 19.7 8.8 161.1 0.0 0.0 422.8<br />

No. of rainy days - - - 1 1 7 8 2 1 10 - - 30<br />

2000<br />

Maximum (°C) 30.6 32.2 35.2 37.3 33.9 29.0 26.8 27.2 29.0 29.5 30.4 28.3 30.8<br />

Minimum (°C) 15.1 15.7 18.5 21.5 21.1 21.3 20.4 20.2 20.4 20.2 16.9 13.4 18.7<br />

RH (%) 48 52 47 57 67 79 81 81 76 77 63 58 65<br />

RF (mm) 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.1 45.4 50.7 125.2 50.4 32.1 88.3 0.0 3.0 539.2<br />

No. of rainy days - - - 1 4 5 6 4 9 7 - 1 37<br />

2001<br />

Maximum (°C) 29.9 34.0 35.3 35.7 34.8 30.3 26.8 27.2 30.1 30.1 31.0 29.6 31.2<br />

Minimum (°C) 15.0 16.8 18.5 22.0 21.5 21.3 21.1 20.9 20.2 19.9 17.9 13.7 19.1<br />

RH (%) 55 50 45 55 59 75 81 81 72 66 55 55 62<br />

RF (mm) 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.1 23.2 32.5 33.1 58.1 53.6 17.0 0.0 Tr 269.6<br />

No. of rainy days - - - 4 2 5 5 5 5 3 - - 29<br />

2002<br />

Maximum (°C) 30.1 31.9 36.0 37.2 34.9 29.6 28.4 26.6 29.8 30.7 30.5 30.2 31.3<br />

Minimum (°C) 14.5 17.9 20.0 21.7 23.0 21.9 21.3 20.5 20.0 20.4 17.1 14.4 19.4<br />

RH (%) 55 50 49 53 62 80 79 82 73 67 62 47 63<br />

RF (mm) 0.0 62.7 0.0 67.0 57.9 60.5 15.0 48.1 6.6 103.6 7.0 0.0 428.4<br />

No. of rainy days - 1 - 5 4 4 0 7 1 6 1 - 29


APPENDIX II<br />

Survey proforma for Entomopathogenic fungi<br />

Date: ________________ Sample<br />

No.:__________________<br />

I. 1. Season<br />

2. Place<br />

3. Taluka<br />

4. District<br />

5. Region/zone<br />

6. Ecosystem<br />

II. 1. Crop<br />

2. Cropping system<br />

3. Soil type<br />

4. Soil temperature (°C)<br />

5. Air temperature (°C)<br />

6. Relative humidity (%)<br />

III. Host/Pest No. of observed No. infected<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

Methodology<br />

1. Field crops : 10 m² area/plot and 3 such plots will be observed at each location<br />

2. Plantations: 10 plants at random will be observed<br />

Infected cadavers will be collected in the vials giving sample number<br />

Date: Signature<br />

IDENTIFICATION<br />

Identified as: ____________________________________________________________<br />

By : ____________________________________________________________<br />

Date: Signature


Maharashtra Association for the Cultivation of Science<br />

AGHAKAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE<br />

(An Autonomous Grant-in-aid Institute under<br />

the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India)<br />

No. 3/59/2003/Adm./ 1794<br />

Dr. (mrs.) Alaka Pande<br />

Scientist E2 & In-charge<br />

Mycology & Plant Pathology,<br />

Division of Plant Sciences<br />

Sub: Identification repost on three fungal cultures<br />

Ref: Your letter No. ENT/DBT/131/02-03dt. 05/02/2003<br />

Dear r. Patil,<br />

February 19, 2003<br />

I am pleased o inform, you that we have completed the identification<br />

work of the above said material and such a brief repost of the same is being<br />

enclosed herewith for your kind perusal and further use. We are thankful to you<br />

for the payment of Rs. 210/- as identification charges for which our accounts<br />

section has passed on a receipt bearing No. 31992 dt. 10/02/2003.<br />

Encl.: a/a<br />

Thanking you,<br />

Dr. R. K. PATIL<br />

Entomologist (Oilseeds)<br />

Department of Agricultural Entomology<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

DHARWAD 580 005<br />

Yours faithfully<br />

(Alaka Pande)


Identification Repost of the fungal cultures supplied by Dr. R.K. Patil, Dept. of Agril.<br />

Entomology, UAS, Dharwad-580 005 dt. 15.2.01


<strong>ISOLATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>CHARACTERIZATION</strong> <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>ENTOMOPATHOGENIC</strong> FUNGI <strong>AND</strong><br />

THEIR EFFECTIVENESS<br />

BHARATHI H. TALWAR 2005 Dr. J. H. KULKARNI<br />

MAJOR ADVISOR<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

An attempt was made to isolate and characterize native entomopathogenic fungi.<br />

Nine insect mycopathogens, belonging to seven genera were found naturally occurring in the<br />

nine districts of Northern Karnataka. Morphological variation among the field collected isolates<br />

of M. anisopliae (Ma2) and V. lecanii (Vl1) for various parameters like, hyphal and conidial<br />

characters, sporulation and spore yield were recorded. Pathogenicity of V. lecanii to aphids,<br />

whitefly and mites and that of M. anisopliae to American bollworms and rhinocerous beetle<br />

was proved in laboratory. Among different carbon sources tested, starch proved superior for<br />

both the mycopathogens NH4 (SO4) and KNO3 were superior as nitrogen source. Bajra and<br />

rice grains served as most productive media for conidial growth of Ma2 and Vl1 with an yield<br />

of 22.77x10 8 and 24.59x10 8 conidia per g of media, respectively. Among pesticides tested,<br />

fungicides showed maximum inhibition followed by insecticides and weedicides. The<br />

persistence of mycopathogens was higher in soil (upto 16 months) than in phylloplane (upto 3<br />

months). In general, all the carrier material had more conidial viability when stored in<br />

refrigerated and deep freezer condition and a reduction of more than 10 per cent and 8 per<br />

cent in refrigerated and deep fereezer was observed after 150 DAS respectively. Oil<br />

formulations proved better than wettable powder.<br />

Among the different concentrations of V. lecanii evaluated in laboratory against B.<br />

brassicae and Aleurodicus disperses, higher dosage of V. lecanii (1.2x10 9 conidia/ha) was<br />

found effective with highest mortality of 92.30 per cent and 80.93 per cent on the 10 th day<br />

after spraying respectively. A comparative account of efficacy of different isolates of V. lecanii<br />

under field conditions were evaluated against B. brassicae and A. crassivora. At the highest<br />

dosage of all isolates (2x10 12 conidia/ha), Vl1 proved most potent against B. brassicae<br />

(61.16%mortality), whereas Vl3 showed better control against A. crassivora (66.50%).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!