30.04.2013 Views

Bulletin05.07.2011 - Emor

Bulletin05.07.2011 - Emor

Bulletin05.07.2011 - Emor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inspiration, Insights & Ideas<br />

Bringing Torah lessons to LIFE!<br />

Continued from p. 13 Parsha Messages<br />

kohen. He’d join his “father” on the dais and recite the Priestly<br />

Blessing; he’d get dibs on the first aliyah. He’d hand down a<br />

tradition of priesthood to his own sons . . . But in reality he’s no<br />

kohen, and his DNA and that of his future male descendents would<br />

not bear those crucial markers.<br />

But almost 100% of all men with family tradition of priesthood do<br />

descend from kohanim. Generation after generation of Jewish<br />

women were faithful to their husbands and their tradition. What a<br />

proud record of fidelity. Geneticists describe these results as “the<br />

highest record of paternity-certainty ever recorded,” and there is no<br />

reason to assume that their sisters married to Levites and Israelites<br />

were any less faithful to their spouses and religion.<br />

Geneticists describe these results as “the highest record of<br />

paternity-certainty ever recorded”This devotion to our spouses and<br />

our G‑d has always been the way of the Jew. Even during our slavery<br />

in Egypt, subject to the capricious demands of an evil nation, our<br />

women distinguished themselves. The Book of Leviticus2 records<br />

the only example of illegitimacy, the product of the rape of a Jewess<br />

by an Egyptian overseer. The Torah hints that this woman’s<br />

flirtatious manner may have precipitated the dreadful occurrence,<br />

but the crime was committed by the Egyptian.<br />

This sad exception only demonstrates how refreshingly modest and<br />

chaste were all other Jews. The very worst and most unfortunate<br />

incident of all the time they were in slavery was not a case of<br />

adultery, G‑d forbid, but abuse. It is to the credit of our ancestors<br />

that, no matter the temptations, irrespective of the dangers, they<br />

fought to stay faithful, and almost without exception they<br />

succeeded. This proud heritage they vouchsafed to us.<br />

Jewish marriages throughout history are a model for all humanity,<br />

and the oaths and bonds that unite us with our partners and Creator<br />

will remain firm and unwavering for now and eternity.<br />

<br />

A Path and a Choice<br />

Ethics 2:1<br />

By Yanki Tauber<br />

T<br />

he long, sunny Shabbat afternoons of summer are perfect for<br />

Torah study. Which is why our sages instituted a weekly<br />

chapter of Ethics of the Fathers, starting with the Shabbat after<br />

Passover.<br />

This Shabbat, we study Chapter Two of the Ethics, the first lines of<br />

which read:<br />

Rabbi [Judah HaNassi] would say: Which is the right path for man to<br />

choose for himself? Whatever is harmonious for the one who does<br />

it, and harmonious for other people.<br />

Half the people reading these lines will go on reading. The other half<br />

will stop short in their tracks, scratch their heads and say, "Huh?"<br />

I must have read those lines dozens of times without giving them a<br />

second thought. After all, I've been doing the annual Ethics-of-the-<br />

Fathers thing since I was a kid. But the first time that I actually paid<br />

attention to what I was reading, I was shocked. I stopped short,<br />

scratched my head and said, "Huh?"<br />

There's nothing unusual, of course, about Rabbi Judah HaNassi's<br />

14<br />

words per se. They'd fit right into a politician's speech or an<br />

"ethicist"'s advice column. They'd sit very comfortably on the<br />

"Quotable Quotes" page of Reader's Digest. But the Ethics of the<br />

Fathers is none of these things--it's one of the 63 tractates of the<br />

Talmud. And to see a statement like that in the Talmud is not just<br />

amazing--it flies in the face of just about everything else the<br />

Talmud, indeed Torah as whole, says everywhere else.<br />

What is "The Torah"? What does it come to say to us? If the message<br />

of the Torah could be summed up in a few lines, it might be<br />

something like this: "There is an objective, divinely ordained path of<br />

goodness and truth. G-d has revealed this path to us at Sinai, and it<br />

has been handed down through the generations in an unbroken<br />

chain of tradition. It is this path that you should follow--not the<br />

desires of your heart or the conventions of your society. The fact<br />

that 'I want this' or 'it feels right' does not imply that the desire is<br />

moral. The fact that 'everyone says it's ok' doesn't mean that it's the<br />

right thing to do. The Creator of the universe is the arbiter of good<br />

and evil, not the wiles of the human heart or the 'political<br />

correctness' of the current decade."<br />

So it's quite surprising to see Rabbi Judah HaNassi (one of the most<br />

central figures in the Talmud, and in the history of Torah's<br />

transmission through the centuries) advising us to "follow your<br />

bliss." Nor would we think that he, of all people, would make a<br />

statement to the effect that "if it's going to make other people like<br />

you, that's the thing to do." Certainly we wouldn't expect him to<br />

define these guidelines as "the right path for man to choose for<br />

himself"! Unless I've completely misunderstood what the Torah is<br />

and says?<br />

There's a story told about a child who's just starting to learn Talmud<br />

and is experiencing confusion with its new, unfamiliar language.<br />

The Arameic word chamra means "donkey." But chamra also means<br />

"wine." "How do I know," asks the cheder boy, "which is which?"<br />

"Simple," says the teacher. "It depends where it's standing. If it's<br />

standing in the stable, it's a donkey; if it's standing on the table, it's<br />

wine!"1<br />

Context is everything: show me where it's written, and I'll tell you<br />

what it means.<br />

That's how the Lubavitcher Rebbe explains Rabbi Judah HaNassi's<br />

perplexing statement. If we examine more closely where this<br />

statement appears, says the Rebbe, we'll better understand its<br />

meaning.<br />

Rabbi Judah's statement is set as the opening lines of the second<br />

chapter of Ethics of the Fathers. So we need to understand the<br />

relationship between the Ethics' second chapter to its first, as well<br />

as the place that the Ethics occupies in the Talmud.<br />

The teachings contained in the Ethics are described as "matters of<br />

piety" (mili d'chassiduta) or behavior that's "beyond the line of the<br />

law" (lifnim mishurat ha-din). For example: In the other tractates,<br />

you'll find the details of the Torah's laws forbidding one to slander,<br />

insult or curse one's fellow, but you won't find a law that<br />

commands you to smile at a neighbor and wish him good morning;<br />

the Ethics, however, enjoins, "Receive every man with a pleasant<br />

countenance." Torah law obligates us to lend material support to<br />

the needy; the Ethics instructs that "the poor should be members of<br />

your household." The strict letter of the law states that "One who<br />

says, 'I am giving this selah to charity so that my son shall live,' is a<br />

perfectly righteous person." The Ethics, however, admonishes:<br />

"Do not be as slaves who serve their master for the sake of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!