03.05.2013 Views

To download as PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

342 WASHINGTON COMMAND POST: THE OPERATIONS DIVISION<br />

forces required." 28 In March OPD drafted<br />

a message for General MacArthur succinctly<br />

summarizing the new planning schedule<br />

then being worked out <strong>as</strong> a result of the<br />

necessity of decelerating in the Pacific:<br />

"CORONET [<strong>To</strong>kyo Plain] will be the decisive<br />

operation against Japan and will be concurrently<br />

supported and <strong>as</strong>sisted by continuation<br />

of OLYMPIC [Kyushu]. . . . B<strong>as</strong>ed on<br />

<strong>as</strong>sumption the European war ends by 1<br />

July 1945, planning is aimed at making possible<br />

target dates for OLYMPIC and CORONET<br />

of 1 December 1945 and 1 March 1946<br />

respectively." 29<br />

In mid-March 1945 OPD's senior representative<br />

on the JWPC noted: "It seems at<br />

l<strong>as</strong>t to be acknowledged that the ultimate<br />

defeat of Japan will require the inv<strong>as</strong>ion of<br />

Japan proper and the defeat of her ground<br />

forces t<strong>here</strong>." 30<br />

Nevertheless, some of the<br />

American planners were still inclined to<br />

prolong the period of time before the decisive<br />

inv<strong>as</strong>ion in order to give the Japanese<br />

a chance to feel the effect of the sea-air<br />

blockade. 31<br />

At this time the inference w<strong>as</strong><br />

less that the Japanese would surrender under<br />

the influence of the air-sea blockade<br />

than that the ground forces should not be<br />

sent <strong>as</strong>hore before the full weight of the<br />

naval and aerial campaign had been<br />

brought to bear. No one clearly went on<br />

record in formal discussions <strong>as</strong> believing<br />

that any method of attack would end the<br />

28<br />

OPD notes for 190th meeting JPS, 21 Feb 45,<br />

filed with JCS 924/11 in ABC 381 Japan (8-27-<br />

42), 7.<br />

29<br />

Msg, Gen Marshall for Gen MacArthur, 23 Mar<br />

45, CM-OUT 57902. OPD drafted the message.<br />

30<br />

Memo, Brig Gen Bessell and Brig Gen F. F.<br />

Everest for <strong>Army</strong> and Air planners, 16 Mar 45, sub:<br />

Reorgn and Future Opns in Pacific Theater, OPD<br />

384 TS, 1/9.<br />

31<br />

(1) Memo, Brig Gen Lincoln for Maj Gen Hull,<br />

26 Mar 45, no sub. (2) Msg, Gen Marshall for<br />

Gen MacArthur, 4 Apr 45, OPD 384 TS, 1/12,<br />

CM-OUT 63196.<br />

war very quickly, although the <strong>Army</strong> Air<br />

Forces and Navy air planners almost certainly<br />

retained more optimistic private<br />

views about the effects of bombardment<br />

than the ground force officers held. Thus<br />

the detailed operational planning that later<br />

brought about the concentrated and coordinated<br />

bombardment of the Japanese<br />

home islands by <strong>Army</strong> Air Forces B-29's<br />

and naval f<strong>as</strong>t carrier t<strong>as</strong>k groups began in<br />

March, but the language used indicated<br />

merely that the bombardment should be<br />

conceived <strong>as</strong> undertaken "in order to create<br />

the most favorable situation in the shortest<br />

possible time for an amphibious <strong>as</strong>sault<br />

against Japan proper." 32<br />

Similarly, American planners who were<br />

busy evaluating the degree of possibility of<br />

Japanese surrender before a "decisive inv<strong>as</strong>ion"<br />

of the home islands showed no conviction<br />

that t<strong>here</strong> w<strong>as</strong> any probability requiring<br />

immediate preparations. 33 In February<br />

1945 Col. Robert J. Wood of OPD<br />

had raised the possibility that the Japanese<br />

might conceivably collapse or surrender<br />

about V-E Day and that no advance planning<br />

to take care of such an eventuality<br />

had been done. 34 However, his own group<br />

in OPD, in considering some "proposals respecting<br />

surrender documents for Japan"<br />

drawn up by the State-War-Navy Coordinating<br />

Committee about that time, declared<br />

that urgency w<strong>as</strong> not apparent. 35<br />

32<br />

JWPC 325/M, 8 Mar 45, title: Jt Bmr <strong>Of</strong>fensive<br />

Against Japan.<br />

33 (1) JIS 141/M, 6 Apr 45, title: Defeat of Japan<br />

by Blockade and Bomb. (2) JIS 143/M, 7 Apr 45,<br />

title: Unconditional Surr of Japan.<br />

34 Memo, Col Wood for Chief S&P, 11 Feb 45,<br />

sub: Collapse of Japanese Govt on or About V-E<br />

Day, filed with JWPC 264/D in ABC 384.1 Japan<br />

(22 Aug 44).<br />

35 OPD Memo for Asst Secy WDGS, 4 Mar 45,<br />

sub: Unconditional Surr of Japan (JCS 1275/1),<br />

filed with JCS 1275/1 in ABC 387 Japan (15 Feb<br />

45), 1-A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!