12.05.2013 Views

Treasure Annual Report 1998-1999 - Portable Antiquities Scheme

Treasure Annual Report 1998-1999 - Portable Antiquities Scheme

Treasure Annual Report 1998-1999 - Portable Antiquities Scheme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

uckle, which is also silver, has identical mouldings<br />

on the top of the tongue but no zoomorphic<br />

decoration on the end. It was complete with its oval<br />

buckle plate. A similar example, although of copperalloy,<br />

has been found in a late-4th century grave at<br />

Lankhills, Winchester (G Clarke, The Roman<br />

Cemetery at Lankhills (Pre-Roman and Roman<br />

Winchester, Part II, 1979), p. 270, grave 283, no.<br />

481). In the Lankhills example the oval buckle plate<br />

also survived. Another copper-alloy parallel was<br />

found in 1851 in an Anglo-Saxon grave at Fairford,<br />

Gloucestershire and is now in the Ashmolean<br />

Museum, Oxford (A MacGregor and E Bolick, A<br />

Summary Catalogue of the Anglo-Saxon Collections,<br />

Ashmolean Museum (Oxford, 1993), p. 305, no. 34.56<br />

(1961.32)). However, the execution of these pieces is<br />

far cruder than the present buckle.<br />

Disposition: Corinium Museum hopes to acquire.<br />

Valuation: £1,250<br />

P GENTIL<br />

39 Knaresborough, North Yorkshire: Roman silver<br />

ring-key fragment<br />

(Fig. 39)<br />

Date: 1st–3rd centuries AD<br />

Finders: Mr M Smith, Ms H Smith<br />

Date of discovery: 2 December <strong>1999</strong><br />

Circumstances of discovery: While searching with<br />

metal-detectors.<br />

Description: The object is a damaged, incomplete keybit,<br />

lacking its ring-handle. There are lines of dotted<br />

decoration on the teeth, several of which are broken.<br />

The treatment of the back and the slight interior<br />

curve indicate that the ring handle was not in the<br />

same plane as the bit but at 90 degrees to it, making it<br />

one of the keys designed to be worn as a finger ring.<br />

Dimensions: Length of ‘bezel’ area: 16 mm; width<br />

(projection of bit): 14 mm; weight: 2.4g.<br />

Note: Approximately 90 per cent for silver.<br />

Disposition: Awaiting inquest.<br />

C M JOHNS<br />

<strong>Treasure</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>1998</strong> - <strong>1999</strong> 23<br />

(fig. 39) Knaresborough (fig. 40) Cantley<br />

Roman Artefacts<br />

40 Cantley, South Yorkshire: Roman silver ring-key<br />

(Fig. 40)<br />

Date: 1st–3rd centuries AD<br />

Finder: Mr P Jones<br />

Date of discovery: 2 November <strong>1999</strong><br />

Circumstances of discovery: While searching with a<br />

metal-detector.<br />

Description: This is a very small silver ring with a<br />

narrow elongated bezel from which a lateral extension<br />

develops. The extension is of rounded form, pierced by<br />

two small circular holes, and has a narrowed base where<br />

it joins the bezel. There is a little damage to the rounded<br />

projection, part of which has broken away. Keys designed<br />

to be worn as rings were a common Roman type.<br />

Dimensions: Internal diameter: 13 mm; width at<br />

bezel: 10 mm. Weight: 2.1g.<br />

Note: Approximately 93 per cent for silver.<br />

Disposition: Awaiting inquest.<br />

41 Gastard, Wiltshire: Possibly Roman gold bar<br />

fragment<br />

(Fig. 41)<br />

C M JOHNS<br />

Date: Possibly Roman<br />

Finder: Mr D Carrier<br />

Date of discovery: November <strong>1998</strong><br />

Circumstances of discovery: While searching with a<br />

metal-detector<br />

Description: The object is an oval-sectioned tapering<br />

bar, the pointed end of which is bent at an angle of<br />

about 115 degrees. The thick end has been neatly cut

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!