15.05.2013 Views

DNA Binding on Sartobind STIC® compared to ... - Sartorius AG

DNA Binding on Sartobind STIC® compared to ... - Sartorius AG

DNA Binding on Sartobind STIC® compared to ... - Sartorius AG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Applicati<strong>on</strong> Note<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Binding</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC ® <strong>compared</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> ® Q<br />

Salt Tolerant Membrane Chroma<strong>to</strong>graphy<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

One of the key applicati<strong>on</strong>s for membrane<br />

chroma<strong>to</strong>graphy is c<strong>on</strong>taminant removal in<br />

flowthrough mode. Ani<strong>on</strong> exchange by<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> Q membranes is proven <strong>to</strong> remove<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> below the detecti<strong>on</strong> limit at process<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s 1. The present study shows that<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA with its primary amine<br />

ligand is much less susceptible <strong>to</strong> decreasing<br />

capacities at high salt c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s than the Q<br />

(quaternary amm<strong>on</strong>ium) matrix. The measurements<br />

have been performed in 96 well plates<br />

by vacuum manifold or at a liquid chroma<strong>to</strong>graphy<br />

system in a membrane holder.<br />

1. Screening of salt and pH c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> binding with 96 well plates (high <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>)<br />

The influences of salt and pH c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> removal was evaluated using <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong><br />

STIC PA and Q membranes. Due <strong>to</strong> the 96 well<br />

plate format, the sample volume and analysis<br />

time could be reduced c<strong>on</strong>siderably.<br />

1.2 Materials and methods<br />

Device format 96 well plate<br />

Membrane Types <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA and Q<br />

Membrane area 1 cm²/well<br />

Membrane<br />

volume<br />

0.028 ml<br />

Membrane layers 3<br />

C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ing 0.5 ml/well 1 M NaCl<br />

Equilibrati<strong>on</strong><br />

buffer<br />

Equilibrati<strong>on</strong><br />

volume<br />

Bis Tris 20 mM, pH 6 and 7<br />

Tris 20 mM, pH 8 and 9<br />

1 ml/well<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Binding</str<strong>on</strong>g> buffer Each equilibrati<strong>on</strong> buffer<br />

with 0, 300, 500 and<br />

650 mM NaCl (approx. 0.8,<br />

6.5, 20 and 36 mS/cm<br />

respectively)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> sample Salm<strong>on</strong> sperm <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(500 - 1000 bp)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (c)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> loading<br />

volume (V)<br />

~145 μg/ml<br />

1.0 ml per well<br />

Plate reader Tecan Safire<br />

(Tecan Group Ltd.<br />

Männersdorf, Switzerland)<br />

Robot liquid<br />

handling system<br />

Lissy 2002 (Zinsser,<br />

Frankfurt, Germany)<br />

In <strong>to</strong>tal, 32 c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (4 different salt c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />

at 4 different pH for two types<br />

of membranes) with each 4 parallel samples<br />

were tested using au<strong>to</strong>matic robot system.<br />

The amount of <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> loaded was chosen so<br />

that a breakthrough could be observed.<br />

Salm<strong>on</strong> sperm <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />

flowthrough fracti<strong>on</strong> was determined at<br />

260 nm by au<strong>to</strong>matic sampling.


1.3 Results<br />

Figure 1 shows the influence of sodium chloride<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> and pH c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

binding <strong>to</strong> ani<strong>on</strong> exchanger membranes.<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA bound stable salm<strong>on</strong> sperm<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> at pH 6–9 in the entire NaCl c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />

range (0 <strong>to</strong> 650 mM). <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> Q shows<br />

breakthrough at 300 mM NaCl.<br />

Small working volumes, an au<strong>to</strong>matic liquid<br />

handling system and high flow rates allowed<br />

the testing of up <strong>to</strong> 96 c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in less than<br />

1 hour.<br />

c/c0<br />

c/c0<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA at pH 6 - 9<br />

0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00<br />

NaCl [mM]<br />

400.00 500.00 600.00<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> Q at pH 6 - 9<br />

0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00<br />

NaCl [mM]<br />

400.00 500.00 600.00<br />

Fig. 1: Breakthrough performance of <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> of <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC and Q at different salt and<br />

pH c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (high <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>)<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9


2. Screening of salt and pH c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

for <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> binding with 96 well plates<br />

(low <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>)<br />

In this experiment, large <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> fragments in<br />

low c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> were used at different pH<br />

and NaCl c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

the first experiment.<br />

2.2 Materials and methods<br />

Equilibrati<strong>on</strong><br />

buffer<br />

20 mM NaAc pH 4.5 and 5.5<br />

20 mM Bis Tris 6.5;<br />

20 mM Tris 7.5 and 8.5<br />

20 mM CHES pH 9.5<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Binding</str<strong>on</strong>g> buffer Each equilibrati<strong>on</strong> buffer<br />

with 0, 300, 500 and<br />

1000 mM (approx. 1.1, 26,<br />

41 and 75 mS/cm)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> sample Calf thymus <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(up <strong>to</strong> 24000 bp)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

~100 ng/ml<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (c)<br />

Refer <strong>to</strong> 1.2 for other materials.<br />

Because of a very low <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

PicoGreen standard assay (PicoGreen ds<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Quant-iT P7581 Reagent, Life Technologies,<br />

Carlsbad, USA) was used for <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis.<br />

The sampling was performed manually and<br />

for the assay, 96 well micro plates (Greiner<br />

Bio-One Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>AG</strong>, Austria) were used.<br />

Breakthrough was calculated by comparing<br />

the PicoGreen signal of each s<strong>to</strong>ck soluti<strong>on</strong><br />

and flowthrough. Detecti<strong>on</strong> limit of the<br />

PicoGreen Assay was ~1 ng/ml.<br />

2.3 Results<br />

As in the first trial with smaller <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> in higher<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>, no breakthrough was found<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA in the whole range<br />

of pH (4.5–9.5) and NaCl c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />

(0–1000 mM). On <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> Q, breakthrough<br />

was seen at 500 mM NaCl <strong>compared</strong> <strong>to</strong> the<br />

first trial.<br />

c/c0<br />

c/c0<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00<br />

4.5<br />

5.5<br />

6.5<br />

7.5<br />

8.5<br />

9.5<br />

Breakthrough of <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA<br />

0 200 400<br />

NaCl [mM]<br />

600 800 1000<br />

4.5<br />

5.5<br />

6.5<br />

7.5<br />

8.5<br />

9.5<br />

Breakthrough of <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> Q<br />

0 200 400<br />

NaCl [mM]<br />

600 800 1000<br />

Fig. 2: Breakthrough performance of <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> of <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC and Q at different salt and<br />

pH c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (low <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>)


3. <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> binding capacity measurement at<br />

LC system<br />

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> binding capacity at 10% breakthrough<br />

for both <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA and Q<br />

membranes were measured using a LC system.<br />

3.1 Materials and methods<br />

Device format Membrane discs in a holder<br />

Membrane area 15 cm² (5 cm² each layer)<br />

Membrane layers 3<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Binding</str<strong>on</strong>g> buffer 20 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.2,<br />

150 mM NaCl<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> sample Salm<strong>on</strong> sperm <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(500 - 1000 bp)<br />

LC system Akta explorer<br />

(GE Healthcare)<br />

The flow rate was 10 ml/min. After equilibrati<strong>on</strong><br />

with 10 ml buffer, salm<strong>on</strong> sperm <str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

binding capacity at 10% breakthrough was<br />

determined at 260 nm (see 1.3).<br />

3.3 Result<br />

The binding capacity for <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA<br />

was 10.9 and for Q 7.3 mg/ml in presence of<br />

150 mM NaCl.<br />

4. Summary<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> 96 well plate membrane devices are<br />

effective <strong>to</strong>ols for rapid process development.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>DNA</str<strong>on</strong>g> removal using <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC PA membrane<br />

is almost independent of NaCl c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />

up <strong>to</strong> 1 M NaCl.<br />

Reference<br />

1. Joachim K. Walter, Boehringer Ingelheim<br />

Pharma KG, Strategies and C<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

for Advanced Ec<strong>on</strong>omy in Downstream<br />

Processing of Biopharmaceutical Proteins.<br />

In: Bioseparati<strong>on</strong> and Bioprocessing;<br />

G. Subramanian, (Ed.), Processing, Quality<br />

and Characterizati<strong>on</strong>, Ec<strong>on</strong>omics, Safety<br />

and Hygiene, Wiley VCH, 1998, vol. II,<br />

pp.447-460<br />

Sar<strong>to</strong>rius Stedim Biotech GmbH<br />

August-Spindler-Strasse 11<br />

37079 Goettingen, Germany<br />

Ph<strong>on</strong>e +49.551.308.0<br />

Fax +49.551.308.3289<br />

www.sar<strong>to</strong>rius-stedim.com<br />

USA Toll-Free +1.800.368.7178<br />

UK +44.1372.737159<br />

France +33.442.845600<br />

Italy +39.055.63.40.41<br />

Spain +34.90.2110935<br />

Japan +81.3.3740.5407<br />

<strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> ®, and <strong>Sar<strong>to</strong>bind</strong> STIC ® are trademarks<br />

of Sar<strong>to</strong>rius Stedim Biotech GmbH<br />

Technical data are subject <strong>to</strong> change<br />

without notice.<br />

Printed in Germany <strong>on</strong> paper that has<br />

been bleached without any use of chlorine.<br />

First published:<br />

November 30, 2010<br />

Publicati<strong>on</strong> No.: SL-4058-e10121<br />

Order No.: 85032-538-43<br />

Ver. 12 | 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!