examples from the threatened lesser kestrel - Digital.CSIC, the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tables Table 1 Blood chemistry values and results of ANOVA tests for nestling and adult Lesser Kestrels. All biochemical parameters are expressed as mg/dl. Mean, SD and range are absolute values, i.e. they have not been transformed. ANOVA tests were conducted using the mean values of nestlings from the same nest and mean values of adults sampled twice or more times (see text). Nestlings Adults Parameter n Mean ± SD Range n Mean ± SD Range F d.f. P Triglycerides a 332 301.4 ± 203.8 [34.6 , 1038] 135 257.2 ± 255.3 [53.2 , 1388.7] 15.23 1, 211 < 0.001 Cholesterol a 326 216.1 ± 65.1 [87.1 , 476.6] 132 275.7 ± 91.7 [87.9 , 789.6] 30.17 1, 209 < 0.001 Uric acid b 320 16.8 ± 6.4 [3.6 , 38.5] 121 15.1 ± 7.6 [3.9 , 34.0] 4.98 1, 203 0.027 Urea b 317 17.2 ± 9.1 [5.1 , 59.5] 124 16.0 ± 9.4 [0.7 , 47.5] 3.95 1, 204 0.052 a Variable log transformed. b Variable square-root transformed.
Table 2 Summary of fixed effects and the overall variability explained (R 2 ) by the general linear mixed models on biochemical parameters of nestling and adult lesser kestrels. All response variables were log transformed, excepting uric acid (nestling model) and urea (adult model) which were square-root transformed. Triglycerides Cholesterol Uric acid Urea Estimate ± SE P Estimate ± SE P Estimate ± SE P Estimate ± SE P Nestlings Intercept 1.009 ± 0.290 < 0.001 2.035 ± 0.167 < 0.001 1.011 ± 0.966 0.297 0.378 ± 0.241 0.119 Sex - 0.102 - 0.087 - 0.398 - 0.187 Female 0.023 ± 0.001 - 0.011 ± 0.006 - 0.036 ± 0.042 0.013 ± 0.010 Year - 0.611 - < 0.001 - < 0.001 - < 0.001 2007 0.022 ± 0.025 - -0.050 ± 0.015 - -0.294 ± 0.082 - -0.113 ± 0.020 - 2008 0.010 ± 0.022 - 0.032 ± 0.013 - 0.282 ± 0.074 - 0.061 ± 0.018 - Colony - 0.005 - 0.515 - 0.912 - 0.534 Silo -0.053 ± 0.019 - -0.008 ± 0.012 - -0.007 ± 0.062 - -0.010 ± 0.016 - Geolocator - 0.111 - 0.825 - 0.195 - 0.287 Untagged -0.035 ± 0.022 - -0.003 ± 0.014 - -0.096 ± 0.074 - -0.020 ± 0.018 - Time of day 0.056 ± 0.011 < 0.001 0.017 ± 0.007 0.011 0.142 ± 0.037 < 0.001 0.029 ± 0.009 0.002 Body mass 0.002 ± 0.001 0.012 0.000 ± 0.001 0.822 0.003 ± 0.003 0.269 -0.000 ± 0.001 0.826 Laying date 0.004 ± 0.002 0.024 0.001 ± 0.001 0.522 0.008 ± 0.005 0.148 0.004 ± 0.001 0.002 Brood identity (%) 6.1 - 38.4 - 17.3 - 22.2 - R 2 (%) 26.9 - 55.7 - 36.1 - 45.8 - Adults Intercept 0.678 ± 0.323 0.038 2.527 ± 0.183 < 0.001 0.094 ± 0.265 0.778 0.564 ± 1.483 0.705 Sex - 0.478 - 0.264 - 0.750 - 0.751
Page 2:
Airam Rodríguez Martín Migratory
Page 6:
Supervisors Dr. Juan José Negro Ba
Page 10:
ix Contents Preface 1 Resumen 3 Int
Page 13 and 14:
unfortunately I did not travel to S
Page 15 and 16:
europeos, lo que sugiere que los do
Page 18 and 19:
Generalities on avian migration 7 I
Page 20 and 21:
MHC as a marker The MHC (Major Hist
Page 22 and 23:
Fig. 1. Lesser kestrel adult male p
Page 24 and 25:
In chapter 4, we tested the perform
Page 26 and 27:
Manel, S., Gaggiotti, O.E. & Waples
Page 28 and 29:
17 Chapter 1 Geolocators map the wi
Page 30 and 31:
Introduction The Lesser Kestrel Fal
Page 32 and 33:
We used twenty 1.5 g data loggers d
Page 34 and 35:
een sighted in the deltas of the Se
Page 36 and 37:
winter also in the Sahel zone. Some
Page 38 and 39:
Klaassen, R.G.H., Strandberg, R., H
Page 40 and 41:
Figures Fig. 1 Validated locations
Page 42 and 43:
Supporting Information Appendix S2
Page 44 and 45:
Appendix S2 Distances and duration
Page 46 and 47:
35 Chapter 2 Effects of geolocator
Page 48 and 49:
Introduction Telemetry studies can
Page 50 and 51:
ird’s leg (Fig. 1C). Darvic rings
Page 52 and 53:
geolocator removed. This individual
Page 54 and 55:
To date, the use of light level geo
Page 56 and 57:
Negro, J.J. (1997) Lesser Kestrel F
Page 58 and 59:
Table 2 Breeding parameters of Less
Page 60 and 61:
Figures Fig. 1 Adult female Lesser
Page 62:
Fig. 3 Body masses of tagged and un
Page 65 and 66:
Abstract Gathering knowledge about
Page 67 and 68:
appropriate fishery management deci
Page 69 and 70:
data). Calculations were carried ou
Page 71 and 72: (trace elements, stable isotopes or
Page 73 and 74: eeding populations from the Eastern
Page 75 and 76: Canal, D., Alcaide, M., Anmarkrud,
Page 77 and 78: Rubinoff, D. & Holland, B.S. (2005)
Page 79 and 80: Figures Fig. 1 Distribution range o
Page 81 and 82: Fig. 3 Origin of alleles found in t
Page 83 and 84: Fana38 0 0 0 0.03125 0 0 0 0 0 EU10
Page 85 and 86: Fana147 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04000 HQ4
Page 87 and 88: 147; 151 Fana152; Fana155 150 Fana1
Page 89 and 90: Abstract Genes of the Major Histoco
Page 91 and 92: genetic structure on the accuracy o
Page 93 and 94: were heterozygous in all cases and
Page 95 and 96: Alcaide, M., Lemus, J.A., Blanco, G
Page 97 and 98: Tables Table 1 Polymorphisms statis
Page 99 and 100: Fig. 2 Influence of the allele-to-i
Page 101 and 102: 40 Fana34 Fana62 Fana7 Fana21 41 Fa
Page 103 and 104: Genbank accession numbers MHC class
Page 105 and 106: Abstract Although published informa
Page 107 and 108: on small mammals (Rodríguez et al.
Page 109 and 110: epeatability (Lessells & Boag 1987)
Page 111 and 112: colony, and they showed a positive
Page 113 and 114: Factors affecting blood parameters
Page 115 and 116: elationship with these two paramete
Page 117 and 118: Alonso-Alvarez, C., Velando, A., Fe
Page 119 and 120: Hernández, M. & Margalida, A. (201
Page 121: Tella, J.L., Forero, M.G., Hiraldo,
Page 125 and 126: Table 3 Results of General Linear M
Page 127 and 128: Fig. 2 Relationship between Triglyc
Page 129 and 130: Fig. 4 Relationship between urea le
Page 131 and 132: data 5 ± 1 and 24.3 ± 10 days for
Page 133 and 134: far as we know, nutritional conditi
Page 135 and 136: LPO (2010) Ligue pour la Protection
Page 137 and 138: 126
Page 139 and 140: I surfed like in the Canaries. Also
Page 141 and 142: coordenadas. A los que integran el
show all

examples from the threatened lesser kestrel - Digital.CSIC, the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?