esc montpellier course syllabi groupe sup de co ... - HUBRUSSEL.net

FINAL EXAMINATION
ESC Montpellier Course Syllabi
Economic Geography (GEO311ESC)
GSCM – Montpellier Business School – ESC Programme course syllabus - 20082009
Page 30/122
The final Exam will require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a series of theoretical concepts, as well as their capacity to apply them
to some studied situations.
Type of evaluation : The final exam will be maily based on course material and issues discussed during class.
All the answers have to be motivated and demonstrate understanding of economic geography issues and good written communication skills
Duration : 2 hours
Language : The Exam has to be written in French.
During the exam, the students cannot access any material and are not allowed to use pocket calculators.
Foreign students from countries that do not have French as official languages are allowed to use hard copy dictionaries (which rovides a
translation from their native language to French) during the exam.
EVALUATION
The evaluation method used in this course will assess students’s ability to identify the most important theories of international trade
environment, to describe and interpret economic reality, to synthesize and debate complex issues
Type of assessment Weight
Presence to lectures and seminars and pre-course homework (DPAS) 20%
Continuous assessment 30%
Final exam 50%
Total 100%
SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS
Newspaper articles depending on actuality
ACADEMIC FRAUD
Academic fraud is an act by a student, which may result in a false academic evaluation of that student or of another student. Without limiting
the generality of this definition, academic fraud occurs when a student commits any of the following offences:
Commits plagiarism or cheating of any kind.
Submits a work of which the student is not the author, in whole or in part (except for duly cited quotations or references). Such work may
include an academic paper, an essay, a test, an exam, a research report, and a thesis, whether written, oral, or in another form.
Presents research data, which has been falsified or concocted in any way.
Attributes a purported statement of fact or reference to a source which has been concocted.
Submits the same piece of work or a significant part thereof for more than one course, or a thesis or other work which has already been
submitted elsewhere, without written authorization of the professors concerned and/or of the academic unit concerned.
Falsifies an academic evaluation, misrepresents an academic evaluation, uses a forged or falsified academic record or supporting document, or
facilitates the use of a falsified academic record or supporting document.
Undertakes any other action for the purpose of falsifying an academic evaluation.