esc montpellier course syllabi groupe sup de co ... - HUBRUSSEL.net
esc montpellier course syllabi groupe sup de co ... - HUBRUSSEL.net
esc montpellier course syllabi groupe sup de co ... - HUBRUSSEL.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ESC Montpellier Course Syllabi<br />
Financial diagnosis (AFI321ESC)<br />
GSCM – Montpellier Business School – ESC Programme <strong><strong>co</strong>urse</strong> syllabus - 20082009<br />
Page 36/122<br />
Notes and other material are not allowed during the Examination scheduled for two hours. The Examination is based on in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt case<br />
studies. Answers have to be motivated and numerical results must be explained. Calculators are allowed. A list of the main formulas and<br />
notations is attached to the Exam document.<br />
EVALUATION<br />
The evaluation method used in this <strong><strong>co</strong>urse</strong> will assess stu<strong>de</strong>nts’ ability to master technical <strong>co</strong>ncepts, to un<strong>de</strong>rstand global <strong>co</strong>nstraints in <strong>de</strong>cision<br />
making and to be effective in their written Communication.<br />
Type of assessment Weight<br />
Presence to lectures and seminars and pre-<strong><strong>co</strong>urse</strong> homework (DPAS) 20%<br />
Continuous assessment 30%<br />
Final exam 50%<br />
Total 100%<br />
SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS<br />
(All these <strong>sup</strong>plementary readings are available on-line via cyberlibris)<br />
1. Teulié J. and P. Topsacalian (2005) Finance, 4ème édition, Vuibert.<br />
2. Gillet R. Jobard, Navatte and Raimbourg (2004), Finance, Dalloz.<br />
3. Vernimmen P., P. Quiry and Y. Le Fur (2004), Corporate finance, John Wiley & sons, In<strong>co</strong>rporated.<br />
ACADEMIC FRAUD<br />
DEFINITION<br />
Aca<strong>de</strong>mic fraud is an act by a stu<strong>de</strong>nt, which may result in a false aca<strong>de</strong>mic evaluation of that stu<strong>de</strong>nt or of another stu<strong>de</strong>nt. Without limiting<br />
the generality of this <strong>de</strong>finition, aca<strong>de</strong>mic fraud occurs when a stu<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>co</strong>mmits any of the following offences:<br />
Commits plagiarism or cheating of any kind.<br />
Submits a work of which the stu<strong>de</strong>nt is not the author, in whole or in part (except for duly cited quotations or references). Such work may<br />
inclu<strong>de</strong> an aca<strong>de</strong>mic paper, an essay, a test, an exam, a research report, and a thesis, whether written, oral, or in another form.<br />
Presents research data, which has been falsified or <strong>co</strong>n<strong>co</strong>cted in any way.<br />
Attributes a purported statement of fact or reference to a source which has been <strong>co</strong>n<strong>co</strong>cted.<br />
Submits the same piece of work or a significant part thereof for more than one <strong><strong>co</strong>urse</strong>, or a thesis or other work which has already been<br />
submitted elsewhere, without written authorization of the professors <strong>co</strong>ncerned and/or of the aca<strong>de</strong>mic unit <strong>co</strong>ncerned.<br />
Falsifies an aca<strong>de</strong>mic evaluation, misrepresents an aca<strong>de</strong>mic evaluation, uses a forged or falsified aca<strong>de</strong>mic re<strong>co</strong>rd or <strong>sup</strong>porting document, or<br />
facilitates the use of a falsified aca<strong>de</strong>mic re<strong>co</strong>rd or <strong>sup</strong>porting document.<br />
Un<strong>de</strong>rtakes any other action for the purpose of falsifying an aca<strong>de</strong>mic evaluation.<br />
Relance a miloudi et g andrieu le 22/4/9