01.06.2013 Views

The Top American Research Universities - The Center for ...

The Top American Research Universities - The Center for ...

The Top American Research Universities - The Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Top</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Universities</strong><br />

report both. We selected the test which has the greatest percentage<br />

of students reporting. To convert ACT scores scores, we use a<br />

conversion table provided by <strong>The</strong> College Board to generate a<br />

comparable SAT equivalent score. When an institution submits<br />

neither an SAT nor ACT score, we substitute data from other national<br />

data sources.<br />

Other Measures of Undergraduate Quality<br />

National Merit and Achievement Scholars<br />

Source: <strong>The</strong> 2006-07 National Merit Scholarship Corporation<br />

Annual Report, which reflects the 2007 freshman class.<br />

<strong>The</strong> National Merit Scholarship Corporation (NMSC) is an<br />

independent, nonprofit organization that awards scholarships to<br />

the nation’s outstanding high school seniors based on their academic<br />

achievement, qualifying test scores, high school principal<br />

and counselor recommendations, and their activities, interests,<br />

and goals. <strong>The</strong> NMSC names approximately 16,000 National<br />

Merit Finalists each February. Of these, about one-half will<br />

receive a National Merit $2,500 Scholarship, a corporatesponsored<br />

scholarship, or a college-sponsored scholarship.<br />

National Achievement Scholars are selected and funded in a<br />

similar fashion and represent the nation’s outstanding African-<br />

<strong>American</strong> students. Ideally, the National Hispanic Scholars Program<br />

should also be included in this category, but it does not track<br />

the enrollment of its scholarship winners. Should it do so in the<br />

future, we will include these students in <strong>The</strong> <strong>Center</strong>’s data. In this<br />

study, Merit and Achievement scholarships are credited to the<br />

main campus if the NMSC Annual Report does not indicate a<br />

branch campus.<br />

While the number of National Merit and National Achievement<br />

award winners in the entering class provides an indication of the<br />

attractiveness of a university’s undergraduate program to outstanding<br />

students, it is also an indicator that is sensitive to institutional<br />

policies on financial aid. Because the number of Merit<br />

Scholars is small, relatively small changes in institutional aid<br />

policies can have a significant impact on the number of National<br />

Merit Scholars enrolling in institutions. <strong>The</strong> average SAT score<br />

provides a broader-based and more reliable measure of overall<br />

undergraduate quality; <strong>for</strong> those reasons, we prefer the SAT scores<br />

to the number of National Merit and Achievement Scholars as an<br />

indicator of undergraduate quality.<br />

Institutional Characteristics<br />

Medical Schools<br />

Source: NCES IPEDS Completions Survey, MD degrees awarded<br />

between July 1, 2006, and June 30, 2007.<br />

Although the IPEDS Institutional Characteristics Survey does<br />

have a “medical” field that indicates whether an institution grants<br />

a medical degree, we choose not to use its data because it includes<br />

medical degrees in Veterinary Medicine, Dentistry, and other professional<br />

health-related fields. For our measure, we determined<br />

whether a particular campus awarded any MD degrees during the<br />

academic year. If the institution did not submit any data to IPEDS<br />

<strong>for</strong> that year, we then looked at whether it was accredited by the<br />

<strong>American</strong> Medical Association to determine whether the institution<br />

has a medical school.<br />

Land Grant Institutions<br />

Source: National Association of State <strong>Universities</strong> and Land Grant<br />

Colleges.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first Morrill Act in 1862 appropriated federal funds <strong>for</strong><br />

universities to provide agricultural and technical education to their<br />

citizens. A second Morrill Act in 1890 expanded eligibility to<br />

include several historically black colleges and universities, and<br />

in 1994 several Native <strong>American</strong> tribal colleges were recognized<br />

as land grant institutions. Today, there is at least one land grant<br />

institution in each state and U.S. territory and in the District of<br />

Columbia. Of the 105 institutions, most are public universities.<br />

Federal land grant institutions receive both federal and state<br />

dollars in support of their agricultural and extension activities.<br />

While land grant status technically applies to some university<br />

systems, such as the University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia and the University<br />

of Nebraska, <strong>for</strong> our study we designate as land grant institutions<br />

only those schools that actually per<strong>for</strong>m that function (e.g., UC-<br />

Berkeley, UC-Davis, UC-Riverside, Nebraska-Lincoln). In these<br />

cases, the land grant field will identify whether an institution is<br />

part of a system-wide land grant and whether the vast majority<br />

of the activity occurs on that campus. For example, UC-Davis is<br />

coded as “Yes-System” while UCLA is coded as “No-System.”<br />

We consider the 1890 institutions as land grant institutions, but we<br />

identify them separately because they do not per<strong>for</strong>m extension<br />

activities.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Focus<br />

NSF/SRS Survey of R&D Expenditures at <strong>Universities</strong> and<br />

Colleges, FY 2006.<br />

In addition to reporting expenditure data by source of funds,<br />

NSF identifies in what major disciplines the money is expended.<br />

In the <strong>Research</strong> by Discipline table we provide the proportion of<br />

total and federal expenditures in each discipline <strong>for</strong> those institutions<br />

with more than $40 million in federal research. <strong>The</strong>se data<br />

are useful <strong>for</strong> developing groups of similar institutions <strong>for</strong> peer<br />

analysis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Institutional Characteristics table provides a summary<br />

measure of an institution’s research strength and concentration<br />

based on these discipline-level expenditures. <strong>Universities</strong> with<br />

95-100% of their federal research dollars spent in one particular<br />

2008 Annual Report<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!